Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I gave the same “growth review” task to the same AI—but changed one thing. One version used general AI. The other used my own analytics framework as a Skill. Most AI-generated reports look clean… until you check whether the metrics actually matter. Task: Monthly App User Growth Review Version... show more

Mohini Shewale

45,565 subscribers

69,609 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

26 Comments

Aarohi Bachhav1 month ago

Custom Skills can make AI outputs much more specific and useful.

Zane AI1 month ago

AI can generate reports, but knowing what actually matters makes all the difference. Great use case for AiPPT

Vinay Bharambe1 month ago

Great Opportunity

Emdad Shaikh1 month ago

Great share

Shahid Ansari1 month ago

The fact that the data stayed the same makes this comparison even more interesting

Vikas gupta1 month ago

AiPPT is making a strong case for Custom Skills here. The difference is actually noticeable

Jaxon1 month ago

Nice share

NOVA1 month ago

The difference a good Skill makes is honestly underrated. Same AI, much better thinking with AiPPT

Tanmoy Debnath1 month ago

That's awesome

David Marco1 month ago

Same same but defeats

Rachel Woods1 month ago

Custom Skills could be one of the most underrated ways to get better results from AI

Holland Tech Marco1 month ago

Excellent share

mamta Devi1 month ago

This is a great reminder that AI is only as good as the context and expertise you give it

Khushi Patil1 month ago

Great opportunity

Mostofa |AI Tools & News1 month ago

Impressive share

Jyoti Soni1 month ago

Honestly, this is the kind of AI use case I’d actually want to try myself

Sagar Rahangdale1 month ago

Same task, different context, completely different result. That’s a powerful demonstration

Swati Gupta1 month ago

A clean-looking report isn’t necessarily a useful report. The analysis behind it matters way more

Rani1 month ago

This is a much better way to think about AI don’t just ask it to analyze, teach it how you analyze

aizah choudhury1 month ago

Great share

Shubham Singh1 month ago

Custom Skills turning generic analysis into something closer to a real analyst is a big deal

Tushar Pawar1 month ago

The difference between generic prompts and custom frameworks is impressive.

Evaa AI1 month ago

This feels like the real next step for AI tools giving them your own expertise, not just prompts

Jawad Rahman1 month ago

That’s cool

Tom Barmore1 month ago

Nice share

Walter Gonsalves1 month ago

Teaching AI your process can lead to much stronger insights.

Related Videos

🤯 I summarized a full article in 30 seconds. No copy-pasting. No rewriting. No wasted hours. Meet Artify my own custom AI summarizer, built on Sintra. Watch how it works 👆 I paste any article. Artify reads it. I get: → A clean summary → Key bullet points → Executive brief → LinkedIn post version → Newsletter intro All from one prompt. All in my brand voice. I used to spend 45 minutes doing this manually. Now? 30 seconds. Every single time. And the best part? I built Artify myself from scratch using Sintra's new AI Agent Builder. No coding. No technical skills. Just my rules, my style, my workflow. You can build YOUR own custom AI helper too. Use code BUILD85 (85% off all plans) for a discount. 🔗 Get started → ♻️ Repost this if you know a founder who needs this. 💬 What would YOUR custom AI helper do? #AI #Sintra #Artify #SmallBusiness #Productivity #AIAgents #Automation #ContentCreation

Onil Coder

20,621 views • 3 months ago

My whole company runs on skills I bundled into a GitHub repo. Here's how to build the same thing for your team: - Put your skills in a GitHub repo - Get Claude to write the couple of JSON files that make it readable as a plugin - In Claude Code, type /plugin, go to marketplaces, add marketplace, paste your repo URL - Split the plugins by department, so your copywriter isn't installing the finance skills It works in Codex too. I've got the same team skills installed there and I use them the same way. Now when I build something like my Notion formatting skill, I add it to the repo and it lands on everyone's Claude and Codex. If someone wrecks a skill, we roll it back to an older version. The key is enabling auto-update, so when someone improves a skill everyone benefits. I don't have a clue how the JSON works. I got Claude to set the whole thing up for me. Start with one skill and before you know it your whole team will be AI pilled.

My whole company runs on skills I bundled into a GitHub repo. Here's how to build the same thing for your team: - Put your skills in a GitHub repo - Get Claude to write the couple of JSON files that make it readable as a plugin - In Claude Code, type /plugin, go to marketplaces, add marketplace, paste your repo URL - Split the plugins by department, so your copywriter isn't installing the finance skills It works in Codex too. I've got the same team skills installed there and I use them the same way. Now when I build something like my Notion formatting skill, I add it to the repo and it lands on everyone's Claude and Codex. If someone wrecks a skill, we roll it back to an older version. The key is enabling auto-update, so when someone improves a skill everyone benefits. I don't have a clue how the JSON works. I got Claude to set the whole thing up for me. Start with one skill and before you know it your whole team will be AI pilled.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

19,532 views • 1 month ago

Your AI sucks. And it's not the model. It's you. "Make it better" isn't a prompt, it's a guessing game. I changed one step in my process and the output quality completely flipped. Same ideas, same models, totally different results.

Your AI sucks. And it's not the model. It's you. "Make it better" isn't a prompt, it's a guessing game. I changed one step in my process and the output quality completely flipped. Same ideas, same models, totally different results.

Flick

322,001 views • 2 months ago

I got tired of explaining myself to AI every single day. Same context. Same workflow. Same instructions. Copy-pasted into every new session like it’s 2022. So I tried Panofy. Uploaded my own scripts and documents to train an agent — then gave it a single instruction. 🔥 It ran the task. Got it right. First time. No prompt loops. No setup. It just… knew. The thing that surprised me most? It actually improves the more you use it. Learns from mistakes. Builds memory. Adapts to how you think. Fewer tokens, better results. I’ve used a lot of AI tools. This one made me feel like I finally own mine. Panofy isn’t just another tool — it’s the best AI agent for expert-level tasks. If you’re serious about building with AI, this is worth trying. Sign up and get 10,000 free credits + 7-day Panofy Plus free trial 👉 #AI #AIAgents #Productivity

I got tired of explaining myself to AI every single day. Same context. Same workflow. Same instructions. Copy-pasted into every new session like it’s 2022. So I tried Panofy. Uploaded my own scripts and documents to train an agent — then gave it a single instruction. 🔥 It ran the task. Got it right. First time. No prompt loops. No setup. It just… knew. The thing that surprised me most? It actually improves the more you use it. Learns from mistakes. Builds memory. Adapts to how you think. Fewer tokens, better results. I’ve used a lot of AI tools. This one made me feel like I finally own mine. Panofy isn’t just another tool — it’s the best AI agent for expert-level tasks. If you’re serious about building with AI, this is worth trying. Sign up and get 10,000 free credits + 7-day Panofy Plus free trial 👉 #AI #AIAgents #Productivity

Aryan Rakib

33,551 views • 4 months ago

I tried to see how far I could push my current AI + 3D workflow and build a playable 3D game prototype in just 3 days😶 Not by asking AI to make the whole game in one prompt. I had my own idea, knew what I wanted to build, and used AI as a tool: - for concepting, - asset generation & texturing, - gameplay logic with the new UE 5.8 MCP + Claude Code. And honestly, it is crazy how far you can get now with the right workflow. Full video - #UE5 #ClaudeCode #AI3D #3DAI

I tried to see how far I could push my current AI + 3D workflow and build a playable 3D game prototype in just 3 days😶 Not by asking AI to make the whole game in one prompt. I had my own idea, knew what I wanted to build, and used AI as a tool: - for concepting, - asset generation & texturing, - gameplay logic with the new UE 5.8 MCP + Claude Code. And honestly, it is crazy how far you can get now with the right workflow. Full video - #UE5 #ClaudeCode #AI3D #3DAI

Stefan 3D AI

20,994 views • 2 months ago

So I've been playing with #FluxEdge , i've deployed Project Jupyter on it, but now also ollama .... oh on 1 machine with 2x 3070's! So now I have my own #AI driven chatGPT version, and run forecasting models on one and the same machine..... all deployed on FluxEdge AI Flux I Decentralized Cloud

So I've been playing with #FluxEdge , i've deployed Project Jupyter on it, but now also ollama .... oh on 1 machine with 2x 3070's! So now I have my own #AI driven chatGPT version, and run forecasting models on one and the same machine..... all deployed on FluxEdge AI Flux I Decentralized Cloud

Jefke

46,653 views • 2 years ago

imagine how powerful your AI chatbot would be if you could hook it up to your own knowledge base? I just made a full walkthrough on how to build your own AI chatbot powered by your custom knowledge base inside, I cover: – how to gather and clean your docs + conversations – chunking + embeddings (so your AI actually remembers details) – setting up a vector database – connecting RAG so the bot pulls the right info when asked – deployment: getting it live for real users reply “RAG” and I’ll DM you the walkthrough + code (must be following)

imagine how powerful your AI chatbot would be if you could hook it up to your own knowledge base? I just made a full walkthrough on how to build your own AI chatbot powered by your custom knowledge base inside, I cover: – how to gather and clean your docs + conversations – chunking + embeddings (so your AI actually remembers details) – setting up a vector database – connecting RAG so the bot pulls the right info when asked – deployment: getting it live for real users reply “RAG” and I’ll DM you the walkthrough + code (must be following)

Tyler

16,677 views • 1 year ago

Marlow might be the game-changer for vibe coding. I gave the same insane space startup prompt to Claude and Marlow: Marlow → cinematic visuals, richer depth, smooth motion, interactive sections, and noticeably faster page-to-page navigation once the site was generated Claude → polished and clean, but the overall experience felt more predictable One big difference: Marlow runs on your own VM, which makes navigating the generated app feel much faster. Same prompt. Marlow took both the creative direction and the actual product experience further. See the prompt in the comments ↓

Marlow might be the game-changer for vibe coding. I gave the same insane space startup prompt to Claude and Marlow: Marlow → cinematic visuals, richer depth, smooth motion, interactive sections, and noticeably faster page-to-page navigation once the site was generated Claude → polished and clean, but the overall experience felt more predictable One big difference: Marlow runs on your own VM, which makes navigating the generated app feel much faster. Same prompt. Marlow took both the creative direction and the actual product experience further. See the prompt in the comments ↓

Dhaval Makwana

66,601 views • 1 month ago

I’m sick of reading AI slop, so today I’m open-sourcing my /no-ai-slop skill that removes 20+ slop patterns from any piece of writing. 📌 Get the free skill here: If you find it useful, please consider starring the repo so more people can find it. Why I built the skill: I use AI to edit my writing because it helps me fix spelling, grammar, and clarity. But even the best models keep producing the same slop that this skill removes: → Binary contrasts: “It’s not X. It’s Y.” → Throat-clearing openers: “Here’s what nobody tells you.” → Fake-profound endings: “The future isn’t coming. It’s already here.” Use this skill responsibly. I always write a first draft manually before iterating with AI on edits and I make sure to do another manual pass at the end as well. That’s in contrast to using AI to automate pumping out slop end-to-end. 📌 Read my full post for more on how I try to use AI responsibly to edit without giving into the dark side:

I’m sick of reading AI slop, so today I’m open-sourcing my /no-ai-slop skill that removes 20+ slop patterns from any piece of writing. 📌 Get the free skill here: If you find it useful, please consider starring the repo so more people can find it. Why I built the skill: I use AI to edit my writing because it helps me fix spelling, grammar, and clarity. But even the best models keep producing the same slop that this skill removes: → Binary contrasts: “It’s not X. It’s Y.” → Throat-clearing openers: “Here’s what nobody tells you.” → Fake-profound endings: “The future isn’t coming. It’s already here.” Use this skill responsibly. I always write a first draft manually before iterating with AI on edits and I make sure to do another manual pass at the end as well. That’s in contrast to using AI to automate pumping out slop end-to-end. 📌 Read my full post for more on how I try to use AI responsibly to edit without giving into the dark side:

Peter Yang

1,192,331 views • 2 months ago

Someone figured out why every AI-coded site looks the same, and shipped the fix. Most common attributes of an AI generated website: - Purple gradient at the top - Rounded cards - Frosted glass look - Inter font - Emoji as icons And a prompt: "Transform your workflow" to get the same thing 10,000 others got. not everything is the model's fault. - your prompt has no strong opinions about design, so it defaults to the statistical average of every landing page it's ever seen. the particular repo is a strict design rules as SKILL.md / .cursorrules files that force the agent to actually decide. - Open-source markdown that you drop into your project. I used it for my own site in some sections: Access GitHub repo and Guide: Site:

Someone figured out why every AI-coded site looks the same, and shipped the fix. Most common attributes of an AI generated website: - Purple gradient at the top - Rounded cards - Frosted glass look - Inter font - Emoji as icons And a prompt: "Transform your workflow" to get the same thing 10,000 others got. not everything is the model's fault. - your prompt has no strong opinions about design, so it defaults to the statistical average of every landing page it's ever seen. the particular repo is a strict design rules as SKILL.md / .cursorrules files that force the agent to actually decide. - Open-source markdown that you drop into your project. I used it for my own site in some sections: Access GitHub repo and Guide: Site:

Veee

107,153 views • 1 month ago

REPLIT JUST LAUNCHED AI SLIDES THAT DON'T LOOK LIKE AI MADE THEM every other AI slide generator spits out decks that scream "made by AI." replit slides is going hard on the angle that yours will actually look presentable. how it works: > describe what you want and it builds a full deck > start from scratch or use a built-in template > import an existing pptx and let AI restyle the whole thing > export to pptx, pdf, or google slides the actually interesting part: > slides are generated as code under the hood > same project can also spin up apps, mobile UIs, dashboards, and animations > everything shares the same design tokens (fonts, colors, spacing) > so your launch deck and the live dashboard it links to look like one product this isn't really replit competing with gamma or tome. its replit betting that slides, dashboards, animations, and apps are all just code (and once you have an agent that writes code well, every knowledge artifact comes from the same prompt). link in replies 👇

REPLIT JUST LAUNCHED AI SLIDES THAT DON'T LOOK LIKE AI MADE THEM every other AI slide generator spits out decks that scream "made by AI." replit slides is going hard on the angle that yours will actually look presentable. how it works: > describe what you want and it builds a full deck > start from scratch or use a built-in template > import an existing pptx and let AI restyle the whole thing > export to pptx, pdf, or google slides the actually interesting part: > slides are generated as code under the hood > same project can also spin up apps, mobile UIs, dashboards, and animations > everything shares the same design tokens (fonts, colors, spacing) > so your launch deck and the live dashboard it links to look like one product this isn't really replit competing with gamma or tome. its replit betting that slides, dashboards, animations, and apps are all just code (and once you have an agent that writes code well, every knowledge artifact comes from the same prompt). link in replies 👇

Creators Toolbox

29,088 views • 4 months ago

Firstly, my work isn’t AI GENERATED PROMPT. The reason why I privated my account was because I was busy yesterday and couldn’t explain things. Fonts that I used: • For the “HAMKU” I used PECKHAM PRESS, I rasterized the letters a bit to achieve a close font from the official account. • For the texts I used CHANTAL medium in lower case. • For my username I used CHALKDUSTER. Brushes that I used: • Studio Pen • HB Pencil (for sketching) • Shale Brush For the colors I won’t list it, kindly check the third photo to see the palettes. I have to admit that I get lazy to use it and even lost in the palettes, so I mainly use the eyedropper tool. Here is the original version, as you can see my original version is so low quality, the lines are too pixelated and not clean—that is why I chose to post the ai enhanced version. Since I used ai to enhanced the lines of my original work, it definitely generated a new version which I still decided to post as the lines are cleaner. I really don’t know the way around on procreate. If you have suggestions on how to avoid the pixelated lines on procreate, kindly please tell me. This is my first time using it for line art cause I mostly use it for painting. I actually don’t know how many layers I exactly have as I already deleted some layers during the process. I didn’t expect I had to provide it. I spent hours on making it from ideas down to the final product. I really wanted it to be similar to the official design. This is my first and last explanation regarding this because if you are still not convinced that I made it, I don’t know what else to say.

Firstly, my work isn’t AI GENERATED PROMPT. The reason why I privated my account was because I was busy yesterday and couldn’t explain things. Fonts that I used: • For the “HAMKU” I used PECKHAM PRESS, I rasterized the letters a bit to achieve a close font from the official account. • For the texts I used CHANTAL medium in lower case. • For my username I used CHALKDUSTER. Brushes that I used: • Studio Pen • HB Pencil (for sketching) • Shale Brush For the colors I won’t list it, kindly check the third photo to see the palettes. I have to admit that I get lazy to use it and even lost in the palettes, so I mainly use the eyedropper tool. Here is the original version, as you can see my original version is so low quality, the lines are too pixelated and not clean—that is why I chose to post the ai enhanced version. Since I used ai to enhanced the lines of my original work, it definitely generated a new version which I still decided to post as the lines are cleaner. I really don’t know the way around on procreate. If you have suggestions on how to avoid the pixelated lines on procreate, kindly please tell me. This is my first time using it for line art cause I mostly use it for painting. I actually don’t know how many layers I exactly have as I already deleted some layers during the process. I didn’t expect I had to provide it. I spent hours on making it from ideas down to the final product. I really wanted it to be similar to the official design. This is my first and last explanation regarding this because if you are still not convinced that I made it, I don’t know what else to say.

Wyn 🐧; EN⁷- (💤/busy = priv)

30,000 views • 4 months ago

“Do I still need to learn 3D if AI can just make it?” A year of testing 3D AI tools, one honest conclusion: skill still decides the result, but ignoring the AI tools is no longer an option. ⚡ One in three new games on Steam already ships with AI disclosed. Skill is still what separates the ones worth playing. So I put the whole thing in one video - where AI works, where it falls apart, which tools are worth your time, and where you're better off learning the basics. One character, one location, one small playable level, blank page to a running Unity build 👇

“Do I still need to learn 3D if AI can just make it?” A year of testing 3D AI tools, one honest conclusion: skill still decides the result, but ignoring the AI tools is no longer an option. ⚡ One in three new games on Steam already ships with AI disclosed. Skill is still what separates the ones worth playing. So I put the whole thing in one video - where AI works, where it falls apart, which tools are worth your time, and where you're better off learning the basics. One character, one location, one small playable level, blank page to a running Unity build 👇

Stefan 3D AI

20,196 views • 1 month ago

The most complete AI design skill stack is now in Open Design. AI agents can build full apps. But most of them still design like shit. You used to spend more time fixing the design than building the app. And prompting harder does not fix taste. So Open Design integrated the design skills everyone on X is talking about: Taste Skill Hallmark Frontend Design Image-to-Code Design Review 100+ design systems It works locally with 20+ AI CLIs: Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, and more. Pick your agent. Generate pages that finally have taste. 👉

The most complete AI design skill stack is now in Open Design. AI agents can build full apps. But most of them still design like shit. You used to spend more time fixing the design than building the app. And prompting harder does not fix taste. So Open Design integrated the design skills everyone on X is talking about: Taste Skill Hallmark Frontend Design Image-to-Code Design Review 100+ design systems It works locally with 20+ AI CLIs: Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, and more. Pick your agent. Generate pages that finally have taste. 👉

Open Design

53,135 views • 3 months ago

Send this to ANYONE on your team using AI agents with Claude/Codex skills: If I were you, I'd put your BEST AI skills in a GitHub repo, turn that repo into a PLUGIN, and have your team INSTALL it in Claude/Codex with auto update on. Why? 1. Everyone gets the same AI SOPs instead of 10 versions floating around Slack 2. When one person improves a skill, the whole team gets the better version. 3. New hires can start with your best workflows instead of a blank AI setup (this is a BIG deal). 4. If someone breaks a skill, you can roll it back with version control. 5. Personal skills can stay personal, while team skills become shared company infrastructure (and an asset!). 6. Your best AI processes stay with the company when someone leaves. 7. You can chain skills together for bigger workflows, like titles -> thumbnails -> descriptions -> YouTube publish. 8. You can track which skills are actually being used and delete the ones collecting dust. 9. You get less slop because the agent has real instructions, examples, taste, and process. 10. Your team moves from single-player AI to multiplayer AI. (thanks to AI with Remy | Learn AI for coming onto The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃) Watch full breakdown here (clearly explained): I don't know why I didn't do this before. The more I think about it, the more obvious it feels: your AI workflows should be version controlled company assets. It kinda feels like the difference between “we use AI” and “we actually operate with AI". Enjoy.

Send this to ANYONE on your team using AI agents with Claude/Codex skills: If I were you, I'd put your BEST AI skills in a GitHub repo, turn that repo into a PLUGIN, and have your team INSTALL it in Claude/Codex with auto update on. Why? 1. Everyone gets the same AI SOPs instead of 10 versions floating around Slack 2. When one person improves a skill, the whole team gets the better version. 3. New hires can start with your best workflows instead of a blank AI setup (this is a BIG deal). 4. If someone breaks a skill, you can roll it back with version control. 5. Personal skills can stay personal, while team skills become shared company infrastructure (and an asset!). 6. Your best AI processes stay with the company when someone leaves. 7. You can chain skills together for bigger workflows, like titles -> thumbnails -> descriptions -> YouTube publish. 8. You can track which skills are actually being used and delete the ones collecting dust. 9. You get less slop because the agent has real instructions, examples, taste, and process. 10. Your team moves from single-player AI to multiplayer AI. (thanks to AI with Remy | Learn AI for coming onto The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃) Watch full breakdown here (clearly explained): I don't know why I didn't do this before. The more I think about it, the more obvious it feels: your AI workflows should be version controlled company assets. It kinda feels like the difference between “we use AI” and “we actually operate with AI". Enjoy.

GREG ISENBERG

79,850 views • 1 month ago

I solved building decks with AI agents — by giving them a CLI tool like Powerpoint or Google Slides. AI could already make a beautiful deck if you asked it to using Ant's pptx skill. The problem was working with it. If it made one alignment mistake, fixing it on one slide would break something on another, and it became a game of whack-a-mole. One time I spent two days playing AI roulette, hoping the next prompt would finally fix the thing, and ended up building the whole deck by hand because I was on a deadline. So I built Hands-on Deck. And the reason it works is that this isn't just a skill — this is PowerPoint. The actual application: PowerPoint, Google Slides, Keynote, whatever you use. This is that, but for an agent, presented as a CLI. Every gesture you make in a deck app maps to a command. Click a box and type, drag a shape from here to there, look at a slide – agent can do it all in a command. And that changes how the agent behaves. With this CLI it works and thinks like a designer — it looks, makes an edit, looks again, makes another surgical edit. Compare that to Anthropic's pptx skill, built on the idea that Claude is a great programmer: it literally writes code to manipulate the deck, hand-editing XML and hoping it doesn't break anything else in the middle. The real test isn't creating something once — it's whether it can make surgical edits like you want. That's what I did in this video walkthrough and my claude crushed it! Check it out for yourself. So decks can be built like a designer now — with real flavor and taste. If you spend hours every week on decks, this gives those hours back. You can install it as a skill in Claude Code, Codex, whatever you use. Works every harness that supports skills. Let me know if you make something cool with it.

I solved building decks with AI agents — by giving them a CLI tool like Powerpoint or Google Slides. AI could already make a beautiful deck if you asked it to using Ant's pptx skill. The problem was working with it. If it made one alignment mistake, fixing it on one slide would break something on another, and it became a game of whack-a-mole. One time I spent two days playing AI roulette, hoping the next prompt would finally fix the thing, and ended up building the whole deck by hand because I was on a deadline. So I built Hands-on Deck. And the reason it works is that this isn't just a skill — this is PowerPoint. The actual application: PowerPoint, Google Slides, Keynote, whatever you use. This is that, but for an agent, presented as a CLI. Every gesture you make in a deck app maps to a command. Click a box and type, drag a shape from here to there, look at a slide – agent can do it all in a command. And that changes how the agent behaves. With this CLI it works and thinks like a designer — it looks, makes an edit, looks again, makes another surgical edit. Compare that to Anthropic's pptx skill, built on the idea that Claude is a great programmer: it literally writes code to manipulate the deck, hand-editing XML and hoping it doesn't break anything else in the middle. The real test isn't creating something once — it's whether it can make surgical edits like you want. That's what I did in this video walkthrough and my claude crushed it! Check it out for yourself. So decks can be built like a designer now — with real flavor and taste. If you spend hours every week on decks, this gives those hours back. You can install it as a skill in Claude Code, Codex, whatever you use. Works every harness that supports skills. Let me know if you make something cool with it.

Nityesh

70,086 views • 3 months ago

Data Models - Better AI Code in 5 Minutes Your AI isn't consistent because you're missing one file. I had the same problem until I started using a data model file. In this video, I'm showing you the exact two prompts I use: one generates the data model, the second uses it to generate features without breaking my app. Testing this with AnimeLeak (my actual production app) adding an admin approval feature. Using Droid with Sonnet 4.5 in spec mode, but this works in Cursor, Claude, or whatever you're using. KEY TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - The One File Your AI is Missing 00:44 - Prompt 1: Generate a Data Model 01:12 - The Result: Data Model Documentation 02:12 - Prompt 2: Implement a New Feature 03:00 - Reviewing the AI-Generated Spec 04:17 - Why This Workflow is So Powerful 04:32 - Your 3-Step Action Plan 05:12 - Next Video: Live Code Generation

Data Models - Better AI Code in 5 Minutes Your AI isn't consistent because you're missing one file. I had the same problem until I started using a data model file. In this video, I'm showing you the exact two prompts I use: one generates the data model, the second uses it to generate features without breaking my app. Testing this with AnimeLeak (my actual production app) adding an admin approval feature. Using Droid with Sonnet 4.5 in spec mode, but this works in Cursor, Claude, or whatever you're using. KEY TIMESTAMPS 00:00 - The One File Your AI is Missing 00:44 - Prompt 1: Generate a Data Model 01:12 - The Result: Data Model Documentation 02:12 - Prompt 2: Implement a New Feature 03:00 - Reviewing the AI-Generated Spec 04:17 - Why This Workflow is So Powerful 04:32 - Your 3-Step Action Plan 05:12 - Next Video: Live Code Generation

Ray Fernando

15,479 views • 11 months ago

i gave my AI employees one job. BUILD ME A $1B STARTUP. MAKE NO MISTAKES. it was literally as easy as selecting a few ai agents, adding them into the same workspace, and watching them interact with each other to build my company i did all this in an hour. you can too!

i gave my AI employees one job. BUILD ME A $1B STARTUP. MAKE NO MISTAKES. it was literally as easy as selecting a few ai agents, adding them into the same workspace, and watching them interact with each other to build my company i did all this in an hour. you can too!

joyce

13,687 views • 4 months ago

When I used to draw just as a hobby with no expectations attached to it, that’s when I enjoyed it the most living in a bliss ignorance 🤣 Now I’m kind of in that same place again, but with 3D modeling my own shit and imagining them like the games I was obsessed with in the 90s.

When I used to draw just as a hobby with no expectations attached to it, that’s when I enjoyed it the most living in a bliss ignorance 🤣 Now I’m kind of in that same place again, but with 3D modeling my own shit and imagining them like the games I was obsessed with in the 90s.

FF69

11,510 views • 4 months ago