正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I gave the same “growth review” task to the same AI—but changed one thing. One version used general AI. The other used my own analytics framework as a Skill. Most AI-generated reports look clean… until you check whether the metrics actually matter. Task: Monthly App User Growth Review Version...

69,609 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

26 条评论

Aarohi Bachhav 的头像
Aarohi Bachhav1 个月前

Custom Skills can make AI outputs much more specific and useful.

Zane AI 的头像
Zane AI1 个月前

AI can generate reports, but knowing what actually matters makes all the difference. Great use case for AiPPT

Vinay Bharambe 的头像
Vinay Bharambe1 个月前

Great Opportunity

Emdad Shaikh 的头像
Emdad Shaikh1 个月前

Great share

Shahid Ansari 的头像
Shahid Ansari1 个月前

The fact that the data stayed the same makes this comparison even more interesting

Vikas gupta 的头像
Vikas gupta1 个月前

AiPPT is making a strong case for Custom Skills here. The difference is actually noticeable

Jaxon 的头像
Jaxon1 个月前

Nice share

NOVA 的头像
NOVA1 个月前

The difference a good Skill makes is honestly underrated. Same AI, much better thinking with AiPPT

Tanmoy Debnath 的头像
Tanmoy Debnath1 个月前

That's awesome

David Marco 的头像
David Marco1 个月前

Same same but defeats

Rachel Woods 的头像
Rachel Woods1 个月前

Custom Skills could be one of the most underrated ways to get better results from AI

Holland Tech Marco 的头像
Holland Tech Marco1 个月前

Excellent share

mamta Devi 的头像
mamta Devi1 个月前

This is a great reminder that AI is only as good as the context and expertise you give it

Khushi Patil 的头像
Khushi Patil1 个月前

Great opportunity

Mostofa |AI Tools & News 的头像
Mostofa |AI Tools & News1 个月前

Impressive share

Jyoti Soni 的头像
Jyoti Soni1 个月前

Honestly, this is the kind of AI use case I’d actually want to try myself

Sagar Rahangdale 的头像
Sagar Rahangdale1 个月前

Same task, different context, completely different result. That’s a powerful demonstration

Swati Gupta 的头像
Swati Gupta1 个月前

A clean-looking report isn’t necessarily a useful report. The analysis behind it matters way more

Rani 的头像
Rani1 个月前

This is a much better way to think about AI don’t just ask it to analyze, teach it how you analyze

aizah choudhury 的头像
aizah choudhury1 个月前

Great share

Shubham Singh 的头像
Shubham Singh1 个月前

Custom Skills turning generic analysis into something closer to a real analyst is a big deal

Tushar Pawar 的头像
Tushar Pawar1 个月前

The difference between generic prompts and custom frameworks is impressive.

Evaa AI 的头像
Evaa AI1 个月前

This feels like the real next step for AI tools giving them your own expertise, not just prompts

Jawad Rahman 的头像
Jawad Rahman1 个月前

That’s cool

Tom Barmore 的头像
Tom Barmore1 个月前

Nice share

Walter Gonsalves 的头像
Walter Gonsalves1 个月前

Teaching AI your process can lead to much stronger insights.

相关视频

Firstly, my work isn’t AI GENERATED PROMPT. The reason why I privated my account was because I was busy yesterday and couldn’t explain things. Fonts that I used: • For the “HAMKU” I used PECKHAM PRESS, I rasterized the letters a bit to achieve a close font from the official account. • For the texts I used CHANTAL medium in lower case. • For my username I used CHALKDUSTER. Brushes that I used: • Studio Pen • HB Pencil (for sketching) • Shale Brush For the colors I won’t list it, kindly check the third photo to see the palettes. I have to admit that I get lazy to use it and even lost in the palettes, so I mainly use the eyedropper tool. Here is the original version, as you can see my original version is so low quality, the lines are too pixelated and not clean—that is why I chose to post the ai enhanced version. Since I used ai to enhanced the lines of my original work, it definitely generated a new version which I still decided to post as the lines are cleaner. I really don’t know the way around on procreate. If you have suggestions on how to avoid the pixelated lines on procreate, kindly please tell me. This is my first time using it for line art cause I mostly use it for painting. I actually don’t know how many layers I exactly have as I already deleted some layers during the process. I didn’t expect I had to provide it. I spent hours on making it from ideas down to the final product. I really wanted it to be similar to the official design. This is my first and last explanation regarding this because if you are still not convinced that I made it, I don’t know what else to say.

Wyn 🐧; EN⁷- (💤/busy = priv)

30,000 次观看 • 4 个月前

Send this to ANYONE on your team using AI agents with Claude/Codex skills: If I were you, I'd put your BEST AI skills in a GitHub repo, turn that repo into a PLUGIN, and have your team INSTALL it in Claude/Codex with auto update on. Why? 1. Everyone gets the same AI SOPs instead of 10 versions floating around Slack 2. When one person improves a skill, the whole team gets the better version. 3. New hires can start with your best workflows instead of a blank AI setup (this is a BIG deal). 4. If someone breaks a skill, you can roll it back with version control. 5. Personal skills can stay personal, while team skills become shared company infrastructure (and an asset!). 6. Your best AI processes stay with the company when someone leaves. 7. You can chain skills together for bigger workflows, like titles -> thumbnails -> descriptions -> YouTube publish. 8. You can track which skills are actually being used and delete the ones collecting dust. 9. You get less slop because the agent has real instructions, examples, taste, and process. 10. Your team moves from single-player AI to multiplayer AI. (thanks to AI with Remy | Learn AI for coming onto The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃) Watch full breakdown here (clearly explained): I don't know why I didn't do this before. The more I think about it, the more obvious it feels: your AI workflows should be version controlled company assets. It kinda feels like the difference between “we use AI” and “we actually operate with AI". Enjoy.

GREG ISENBERG

79,850 次观看 • 1 个月前

I solved building decks with AI agents — by giving them a CLI tool like Powerpoint or Google Slides. AI could already make a beautiful deck if you asked it to using Ant's pptx skill. The problem was working with it. If it made one alignment mistake, fixing it on one slide would break something on another, and it became a game of whack-a-mole. One time I spent two days playing AI roulette, hoping the next prompt would finally fix the thing, and ended up building the whole deck by hand because I was on a deadline. So I built Hands-on Deck. And the reason it works is that this isn't just a skill — this is PowerPoint. The actual application: PowerPoint, Google Slides, Keynote, whatever you use. This is that, but for an agent, presented as a CLI. Every gesture you make in a deck app maps to a command. Click a box and type, drag a shape from here to there, look at a slide – agent can do it all in a command. And that changes how the agent behaves. With this CLI it works and thinks like a designer — it looks, makes an edit, looks again, makes another surgical edit. Compare that to Anthropic's pptx skill, built on the idea that Claude is a great programmer: it literally writes code to manipulate the deck, hand-editing XML and hoping it doesn't break anything else in the middle. The real test isn't creating something once — it's whether it can make surgical edits like you want. That's what I did in this video walkthrough and my claude crushed it! Check it out for yourself. So decks can be built like a designer now — with real flavor and taste. If you spend hours every week on decks, this gives those hours back. You can install it as a skill in Claude Code, Codex, whatever you use. Works every harness that supports skills. Let me know if you make something cool with it.

Nityesh

70,086 次观看 • 3 个月前