Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I have never once heard Allie Beth speak where her message wasn’t utterly rooted in scripture. I don’t even know what Candace is talking about here. Allie never just drops random out-of-context Bible verses and leaves it at that. She’s always putting things in context and giving an edifying...

NJBeisner's profile picture

Natalie Jean Beisner

119,716 subscribers

76,102 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

BildungNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Watching Allie Beth Stuckey respond to Candace Owens was a masterclass in what Christian correction should look like. Allie addressed the conspiracy claims with clarity, Scripture, and love. She pointed people to Christ, offered biblical principles for discernment, and handled the situation with grace that many of us (including me) can aspire to. And yet Candace responded by calling her a “fake Christian.” Anyone who has followed Allie’s work knows how unfair and disingenuous that is. Her fruits speak for themselves. She is thoughtful, rooted in Scripture, and consistently reflects the character of Christ in how she communicates. What confuses me is this double standard: Candace can flippantly accuse others, imply dark motives, and stir fear without evidence… but the moment someone pushes back with facts, Scripture, and clarity, suddenly they are the problem. You are not allowed to question her, but she can question everyone else. That is not accountability, and it is not biblical. Allie’s response embodied the love described in 1 Corinthians 13: patient, kind, not boastful, not dishonoring, rejoicing in truth. Candace’s response did not reflect any of that. It was not loving, not rooted in Scripture, and not reflective of the Spirit. Christians need to pay attention to this. We are called to test every spirit, to judge righteously, and to discern when someone’s influence is pulling people toward truth or toward confusion. What Allie displayed is the model. What Candace displayed is not.
4:34

Watching Allie Beth Stuckey respond to Candace Owens was a masterclass in what Christian correction should look like. Allie addressed the conspiracy claims with clarity, Scripture, and love. She pointed people to Christ, offered biblical principles for discernment, and handled the situation with grace that many of us (including me) can aspire to. And yet Candace responded by calling her a “fake Christian.” Anyone who has followed Allie’s work knows how unfair and disingenuous that is. Her fruits speak for themselves. She is thoughtful, rooted in Scripture, and consistently reflects the character of Christ in how she communicates. What confuses me is this double standard: Candace can flippantly accuse others, imply dark motives, and stir fear without evidence… but the moment someone pushes back with facts, Scripture, and clarity, suddenly they are the problem. You are not allowed to question her, but she can question everyone else. That is not accountability, and it is not biblical. Allie’s response embodied the love described in 1 Corinthians 13: patient, kind, not boastful, not dishonoring, rejoicing in truth. Candace’s response did not reflect any of that. It was not loving, not rooted in Scripture, and not reflective of the Spirit. Christians need to pay attention to this. We are called to test every spirit, to judge righteously, and to discern when someone’s influence is pulling people toward truth or toward confusion. What Allie displayed is the model. What Candace displayed is not.

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

47,956 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

We have to stop baptizing bigotry with Bible verses. We have to stop wielding Scripture like a weapon. I wrote this book because there are better ways to read the Bible—ways that promote wholeness and flourishing for all people. When we use Scripture as Jesus intended, it leads away from harm and toward healing. Better Ways To Read The Bible is my attempt to take what I’ve learned from authors, activists, scholars and theologians, as well as from the incredible people I’ve gotten to minister alongside for almost two decades, and synthesize it into a helpful resource for engaging with the Scripture in healthier ways.
1:50

We have to stop baptizing bigotry with Bible verses. We have to stop wielding Scripture like a weapon. I wrote this book because there are better ways to read the Bible—ways that promote wholeness and flourishing for all people. When we use Scripture as Jesus intended, it leads away from harm and toward healing. Better Ways To Read The Bible is my attempt to take what I’ve learned from authors, activists, scholars and theologians, as well as from the incredible people I’ve gotten to minister alongside for almost two decades, and synthesize it into a helpful resource for engaging with the Scripture in healthier ways.

Zach W. Lambert

13,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Candace Owens mocks Dana Loesch quoting scripture: “Widows! WIDOWS! Widows! The WIDOW! You shall honor THE WIDOW!” *laughs* “You shall worship THE WIDOW! I’m gonna keep telling you THE WIDOW, and you will see we are BIBLICAL here!” She says it’s a grift and, “They just find whatever Bible verse they want and tell you, ‘This is what it means!’” But if these verses DON’T mean that we are to protect and defend widows, then what DO they mean? Candace tells you it’s meaningless but provides you no alternative reading of the scripture. Could that be because she’s in direct rebellion to it & Dana was correctly rebuking her?
0:57

.Candace Owens mocks Dana Loesch quoting scripture: “Widows! WIDOWS! Widows! The WIDOW! You shall honor THE WIDOW!” *laughs* “You shall worship THE WIDOW! I’m gonna keep telling you THE WIDOW, and you will see we are BIBLICAL here!” She says it’s a grift and, “They just find whatever Bible verse they want and tell you, ‘This is what it means!’” But if these verses DON’T mean that we are to protect and defend widows, then what DO they mean? Candace tells you it’s meaningless but provides you no alternative reading of the scripture. Could that be because she’s in direct rebellion to it & Dana was correctly rebuking her?

Jackie Chea ⚖️

40,350 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“I don’t think I have the perfect interpretation [of scripture] because I’m not a perfect person, but I do look to the word of God to be my authority and humbly, in humility, try to do the very best I can to understand all of it in context and apply it to my life. Rationale is really important…but to say that it’s the determinant of morality, that’s a really scary world. Think about what our rationale has rationalized for so long.”
3:18

“I don’t think I have the perfect interpretation [of scripture] because I’m not a perfect person, but I do look to the word of God to be my authority and humbly, in humility, try to do the very best I can to understand all of it in context and apply it to my life. Rationale is really important…but to say that it’s the determinant of morality, that’s a really scary world. Think about what our rationale has rationalized for so long.”

Natalie Jean Beisner

49,225 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

You see, this is how Candace Owens gets away with spewing her bullshit. Because her cultists are gullible, stupid, and evil (a deadly combination) they don’t hold her accountable to say things that logically follow. Here Candace is going after Dana Loesch and mocking her for simply reading Scripture that talks about widows and how they are to be treated. Candace doesn’t want to contend with the substance of this because even though she believes herself to be God, she’s at least smart enough to realize that arguing against it would put her in direct contradiction to God’s Word in the public view. So she goes with mockery instead. Candace says that “Just because you can quote a Bible verse, that doesn’t confer sanctification on you.” And she uses examples of how gang members and famous people have Bible verses tattooed on their bodies but live anything but holy lives. But here’s the difference, Candace: Erika Kirk is not the one out in public quoting Scripture about how she should be treated. Others are. We are. And the Scripture is very clear that we are the ones called to defend, uphold, and honor the widow—not the widow herself. If Erika was out shoving Bible verses in our faces about how she deserves respect because she’s a widow, then I would agree that would be too much. But Erika isn’t doing that, and she’s handling the slings and arrows you keep sending her way with grace. Keep trying to put yourself above God’s Word, Candace, and see how well that goes for you. I predict bouts of madness on the level of King Nebuchadnezzar that will have you eating grass in the field. I predict you will lose your sanity at a much younger age than the average person. Keep immersing yourself in bullshit asinine conspiracy theories and watch as your mental acuity rapidly begins to deteriorate.
2:26

You see, this is how Candace Owens gets away with spewing her bullshit. Because her cultists are gullible, stupid, and evil (a deadly combination) they don’t hold her accountable to say things that logically follow. Here Candace is going after Dana Loesch and mocking her for simply reading Scripture that talks about widows and how they are to be treated. Candace doesn’t want to contend with the substance of this because even though she believes herself to be God, she’s at least smart enough to realize that arguing against it would put her in direct contradiction to God’s Word in the public view. So she goes with mockery instead. Candace says that “Just because you can quote a Bible verse, that doesn’t confer sanctification on you.” And she uses examples of how gang members and famous people have Bible verses tattooed on their bodies but live anything but holy lives. But here’s the difference, Candace: Erika Kirk is not the one out in public quoting Scripture about how she should be treated. Others are. We are. And the Scripture is very clear that we are the ones called to defend, uphold, and honor the widow—not the widow herself. If Erika was out shoving Bible verses in our faces about how she deserves respect because she’s a widow, then I would agree that would be too much. But Erika isn’t doing that, and she’s handling the slings and arrows you keep sending her way with grace. Keep trying to put yourself above God’s Word, Candace, and see how well that goes for you. I predict bouts of madness on the level of King Nebuchadnezzar that will have you eating grass in the field. I predict you will lose your sanity at a much younger age than the average person. Keep immersing yourself in bullshit asinine conspiracy theories and watch as your mental acuity rapidly begins to deteriorate.

Jordan S90

36,424 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

In this clip, Candace shows how spiritually immature she is. She says she used to pray for Ben Shapiro because her “priest told her to”—not because God told her to, in scripture, but because her priest said. She then goes on to say she “prayed for Ben a lot more than she should have” and has since stopped. What does that even mean? Does the Bible give a quota on how many times one should pray for one’s enemies, a maximum limit of prayers? She wraps it up by saying she’ll avoid her priest for a time, so that he doesn’t urge her to pray for Ben. Right here Candace is proving she’s not under the authority of the Holy Spirit.
0:42

In this clip, Candace shows how spiritually immature she is. She says she used to pray for Ben Shapiro because her “priest told her to”—not because God told her to, in scripture, but because her priest said. She then goes on to say she “prayed for Ben a lot more than she should have” and has since stopped. What does that even mean? Does the Bible give a quota on how many times one should pray for one’s enemies, a maximum limit of prayers? She wraps it up by saying she’ll avoid her priest for a time, so that he doesn’t urge her to pray for Ben. Right here Candace is proving she’s not under the authority of the Holy Spirit.

Natalie Jean Beisner

55,020 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tim Pool SCORCHES 🔥 Candace Owens and exposes the real PSYOP‼️ Candace claims she’s UNDER ATTACK and the powers that be are trying to censor her… The reality? Candace is boosted and highly recommended on every single social media platform. From Facebook to YouTube. That can only mean one thing… Someone behind the scenes wants HER MESSAGE to be heard. Why? We can only SPECULATE for now. But what we do know FOR A FACT is that she’s not censored at all and the exact opposite is actually happening because her content is BOOSTED every where you look. And I have to AGREE with Tim here. As I have said for months… I don’t think Candace is crazy… I don’t think Candace believes any of this… I don’t think Candace is on drugs… I do think Candace is kinda stupid but not that stupid… I think Candace is LYING and doing all of this on purpose for her own AGENDAS whatever they may be. And as Tim points out… Candace has now backed herself into a position where she has to constantly ONE UP her own crazy theories in order to keep her audience appeased so they won’t turn on her next.
3:54

Tim Pool SCORCHES 🔥 Candace Owens and exposes the real PSYOP‼️ Candace claims she’s UNDER ATTACK and the powers that be are trying to censor her… The reality? Candace is boosted and highly recommended on every single social media platform. From Facebook to YouTube. That can only mean one thing… Someone behind the scenes wants HER MESSAGE to be heard. Why? We can only SPECULATE for now. But what we do know FOR A FACT is that she’s not censored at all and the exact opposite is actually happening because her content is BOOSTED every where you look. And I have to AGREE with Tim here. As I have said for months… I don’t think Candace is crazy… I don’t think Candace believes any of this… I don’t think Candace is on drugs… I do think Candace is kinda stupid but not that stupid… I think Candace is LYING and doing all of this on purpose for her own AGENDAS whatever they may be. And as Tim points out… Candace has now backed herself into a position where she has to constantly ONE UP her own crazy theories in order to keep her audience appeased so they won’t turn on her next.

Cinema Shogun

29,555 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“I do not believe that 1948 Israel is a biblical prophecy fulfillment.” How is that possible when Scripture prophesied that Israel will be physically regathered for judgment? Scripture tells us that God will gather, judge, and purify Israel and also that Israel will be hardened until the fullness of gentiles come in. I have no idea which part of that Christians like Carrie find egregious or “Jewish supremacist;” we’re literally talking about Israel being judged by God for disobedience and unbelief. And frankly I don’t care which part she finds offensive because what matters isn’t our opinion on God’s word. But mostly, it seems like people like her don’t even know it’s in the Bible. To me, it seems like we’re in the physical regathering of Israel and have been since 1948—which comes before the spiritual regathering.
0:28

“I do not believe that 1948 Israel is a biblical prophecy fulfillment.” How is that possible when Scripture prophesied that Israel will be physically regathered for judgment? Scripture tells us that God will gather, judge, and purify Israel and also that Israel will be hardened until the fullness of gentiles come in. I have no idea which part of that Christians like Carrie find egregious or “Jewish supremacist;” we’re literally talking about Israel being judged by God for disobedience and unbelief. And frankly I don’t care which part she finds offensive because what matters isn’t our opinion on God’s word. But mostly, it seems like people like her don’t even know it’s in the Bible. To me, it seems like we’re in the physical regathering of Israel and have been since 1948—which comes before the spiritual regathering.

Natalie Jean Beisner

13,314 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

We never see in scripture Jesus calling Mary “mother”. He never called her mother, but woman. So why should we call Mary something Jesus did not? According to Jewish Custom it was the expectation of the firstborn to care for the welfare of his widowed mother. Jesus chose to leave the welfare of his widowed mother to John, who was a believer and was present, rather than entrusting her to His half brothers, who were not believers at the time and who were not even present at His crucifixion. There is no contextual proof within Scripture itself that would point to Jesus broadening Mary’s role as “mother” of all Christians. Words have meaning and it is defined by the context. You should understand the overall context before you create meaning and doctrine.
2:31

We never see in scripture Jesus calling Mary “mother”. He never called her mother, but woman. So why should we call Mary something Jesus did not? According to Jewish Custom it was the expectation of the firstborn to care for the welfare of his widowed mother. Jesus chose to leave the welfare of his widowed mother to John, who was a believer and was present, rather than entrusting her to His half brothers, who were not believers at the time and who were not even present at His crucifixion. There is no contextual proof within Scripture itself that would point to Jesus broadening Mary’s role as “mother” of all Christians. Words have meaning and it is defined by the context. You should understand the overall context before you create meaning and doctrine.

The Bible In Context

46,432 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Candace Owens is attacking Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) for being a "mean girl", using her Christianity to justify her behaviour and that she wasn't actually that close to Charlie Kirk - as usual everything is PROJECTION with Candace. Candace also claimed the only reason Stuckey was going after her was because: "you are part Jewish and you are being exceedingly tribal." Stuckey responded, to this absurd attack, saying "my great-grandfather whom I never met was Jewish." So just in case people forgot amongst all the disgusting things Candace Owens has been doing, yes, she still despises Jews.
0:40

Candace Owens is attacking Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) for being a "mean girl", using her Christianity to justify her behaviour and that she wasn't actually that close to Charlie Kirk - as usual everything is PROJECTION with Candace. Candace also claimed the only reason Stuckey was going after her was because: "you are part Jewish and you are being exceedingly tribal." Stuckey responded, to this absurd attack, saying "my great-grandfather whom I never met was Jewish." So just in case people forgot amongst all the disgusting things Candace Owens has been doing, yes, she still despises Jews.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

41,717 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

DERIVING PROFIT FROM SCRIPTURE The accuracy of the Bible is not in the archeological flawlessness of its writings nor the personality of the authors, but in its ability to deliver God's intent as far as the revelation of God, Jesus, man, and salvation are concerned. The profiting of Scripture is only derived under the influence of The Spirit of Revelation, which guides your heart to the essence of every story, verse, and expression, captured within Scripture. As open as The Bible is, there are seals. You can only open the book, but only The Spirit of Revelation unlocks the seals, opening you up to mysteries. What profits you is not the verse of the Scripture, it is the light in the Scripture. The focus of your Bible study should center on the love of God, captured in the substitutionary sacrifice of Christ for man (being the object), and the mercy plan of salvation. Watch the full sermon "The Spirit of Revelation (Deriving Profit From Scripture) on our YouTube channel at Koinonia Global. #ApostleJoshuaSelman #TheSpiritOfRevelation #DerivingProfitFromScripture #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaGlobal
6:08

DERIVING PROFIT FROM SCRIPTURE The accuracy of the Bible is not in the archeological flawlessness of its writings nor the personality of the authors, but in its ability to deliver God's intent as far as the revelation of God, Jesus, man, and salvation are concerned. The profiting of Scripture is only derived under the influence of The Spirit of Revelation, which guides your heart to the essence of every story, verse, and expression, captured within Scripture. As open as The Bible is, there are seals. You can only open the book, but only The Spirit of Revelation unlocks the seals, opening you up to mysteries. What profits you is not the verse of the Scripture, it is the light in the Scripture. The focus of your Bible study should center on the love of God, captured in the substitutionary sacrifice of Christ for man (being the object), and the mercy plan of salvation. Watch the full sermon "The Spirit of Revelation (Deriving Profit From Scripture) on our YouTube channel at Koinonia Global. #ApostleJoshuaSelman #TheSpiritOfRevelation #DerivingProfitFromScripture #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaGlobal

Koinonia Global

15,939 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Victor Marx: “I believe I can do what Christ did and said we would do also.” Candace Owens: “Yeah, He’s Christ.” Listen, I’m wary of deliverance ministries. I also don’t believe that Christ followers can be under demonic possession. That said, it’s pretty obvious here that Candace is wholly unfamiliar with Mark 16:17, Luke 9:1, Matthew 10:1, and John 14:12. Forget about arguing over how best to interpret the verses; she doesn’t even know they exist. She’s never read the Gospel and just listens to short snippets at Mass on Sundays. Truly shameful. She gets real quiet whenever specifics in Scripture are mentioned BECAUSE SHE DOESN’T KNOW SCRIPTURE.
0:52

Victor Marx: “I believe I can do what Christ did and said we would do also.” Candace Owens: “Yeah, He’s Christ.” Listen, I’m wary of deliverance ministries. I also don’t believe that Christ followers can be under demonic possession. That said, it’s pretty obvious here that Candace is wholly unfamiliar with Mark 16:17, Luke 9:1, Matthew 10:1, and John 14:12. Forget about arguing over how best to interpret the verses; she doesn’t even know they exist. She’s never read the Gospel and just listens to short snippets at Mass on Sundays. Truly shameful. She gets real quiet whenever specifics in Scripture are mentioned BECAUSE SHE DOESN’T KNOW SCRIPTURE.

Natalie Jean Beisner

14,120 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BILL O’REILLY: “Have you talked to either [Megyn] Kelly or [Candace] Owens about what they’re doing?” BEN SHAPIRO: “I mean, I did have a text conversation with Megyn about some of these issues, I would say prior to this all becoming quite public.” “As far Candace, obviously Candace used to work for our company and we fired her.” “So the relations there are not exactly the best…” O’REILLY: “No, I’m just curious as a journalist…I always like to know the mindset of the people that I have to confront…” “Do you think you’re missing anything with Kelly and Owens?” SHAPIRO: “No, I really do not think I’m missing anything with Megyn or Candace.” “I think that Megyn’s motivation is generally that she would like clicks and that she would like friendships inside the so-called movement.” “And I think the motivation for Candace…I can’t even begin to speculate on the psychiatric state of Candace Owens.” “I will say that she has humored legitimately every nutty conspiracy theory it is possible to humor and she is uniquely capable of coming up with new ones at the drop of a hat.” “I’m frankly astonished by her creativity and innovativeness when it comes to making new conspiracy theories appear out of thin air.”
1:34

BILL O’REILLY: “Have you talked to either [Megyn] Kelly or [Candace] Owens about what they’re doing?” BEN SHAPIRO: “I mean, I did have a text conversation with Megyn about some of these issues, I would say prior to this all becoming quite public.” “As far Candace, obviously Candace used to work for our company and we fired her.” “So the relations there are not exactly the best…” O’REILLY: “No, I’m just curious as a journalist…I always like to know the mindset of the people that I have to confront…” “Do you think you’re missing anything with Kelly and Owens?” SHAPIRO: “No, I really do not think I’m missing anything with Megyn or Candace.” “I think that Megyn’s motivation is generally that she would like clicks and that she would like friendships inside the so-called movement.” “And I think the motivation for Candace…I can’t even begin to speculate on the psychiatric state of Candace Owens.” “I will say that she has humored legitimately every nutty conspiracy theory it is possible to humor and she is uniquely capable of coming up with new ones at the drop of a hat.” “I’m frankly astonished by her creativity and innovativeness when it comes to making new conspiracy theories appear out of thin air.”

Overton

384,404 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Oh damn she named donors. I don’t think that’s going to fly well. That is a lawsuit. First it’s not public information and second you can’t give out personal information on people like this. Oh and she is insinuating a lawsuit on TPUsa but there’s nothing she can sue them for. They don’t have to give her information. This is all a show on her part. It was discussed at a dinner break out session for the big donors. Now she’s telling her followers to not attack the donors. Oh Candace you know what you just did. You just put them in a cross hairs of your Candace crazies. They will be hounded and slandered from all sides now. Now she’s back to the DC FOIA and states the video is fake. The Dept of War hasn’t answered her. Dept of War says they aren’t answering it. They said it was too much of a burden to look for it. They are just messing with her now. It’s pissing her off. Now she’s going off on TPUsa not standing behind Massie. And not standing up over the Iran war. Charlie wasn’t assassinated by the left. She insisting it was the US government. It’s deep state. And it’s over Israel. Let’s all keep in mind that Candace has no evidence of any of this. She’s just rambling her same old stuff. Erika isn’t acting like a grieving widow. She’s in on her husbands death. She is evil. Erika really needs to sue her and take Candace for all she has. Erika is just being used to cover it all up. This is stupid. Now we are going into celebrity gossip. She really has nothing to talk about anymore. But the video. So now we are going to gossip. Her viewers aren’t happy about it. Many are saying they are watching her for celebrity gossip. She’s upset Ivanka bought an island and is making fun of her about it. I think Candace is so jealous. You can see it on her face. Look at her face. It’s so funny. So now she’s blaming Ivanka for Gaza now. And now saying Ivanka is friends with the Rothschilds and has too much money. And hurt kids. And blah blah blah. I remember when Candace said Ivanka was the most beautiful woman she met and so sweet too. I’ll have to find that article. And her husband genocided and the Palestines were killed for a vacation project. Russia good. I don’t know why but hey we had to throw it in there. Russia is really nice guys. We need to visit. PR crisis mode for US weekly. And Erika is putting in ad to slander Candace. I thought about this today. This is epic. Want to know why. Because 99.9% of the US doesn’t watch Candace. So Candace can’t fight it on her podcast because these people don’t watch her. Candace says she doesn’t call anyone. If you want to talk to her you have to call her assistant. She doesn’t answer calls. Ok noted don’t call Candace. You can tell it’s irritating her a lot. Ok we are back to celebrity gossip. Adriana Grande is using Ethan Slader and took him away from his wife and baby. I didn’t even know about this but I don’t follow any of this. For some reason these seems personal for Candace. Candace is your husband stepping out on you? Not only is he gay, an alcoholic but he’s cheating on you? You seem personally invested. Again her audience is complaining they don’t want to hear about it. And that’s all we got. She never talks nice about anyone. Ever notice that? Her audience seemed to tonight. A few called it out. She’s losing her audience.
0:25

Oh damn she named donors. I don’t think that’s going to fly well. That is a lawsuit. First it’s not public information and second you can’t give out personal information on people like this. Oh and she is insinuating a lawsuit on TPUsa but there’s nothing she can sue them for. They don’t have to give her information. This is all a show on her part. It was discussed at a dinner break out session for the big donors. Now she’s telling her followers to not attack the donors. Oh Candace you know what you just did. You just put them in a cross hairs of your Candace crazies. They will be hounded and slandered from all sides now. Now she’s back to the DC FOIA and states the video is fake. The Dept of War hasn’t answered her. Dept of War says they aren’t answering it. They said it was too much of a burden to look for it. They are just messing with her now. It’s pissing her off. Now she’s going off on TPUsa not standing behind Massie. And not standing up over the Iran war. Charlie wasn’t assassinated by the left. She insisting it was the US government. It’s deep state. And it’s over Israel. Let’s all keep in mind that Candace has no evidence of any of this. She’s just rambling her same old stuff. Erika isn’t acting like a grieving widow. She’s in on her husbands death. She is evil. Erika really needs to sue her and take Candace for all she has. Erika is just being used to cover it all up. This is stupid. Now we are going into celebrity gossip. She really has nothing to talk about anymore. But the video. So now we are going to gossip. Her viewers aren’t happy about it. Many are saying they are watching her for celebrity gossip. She’s upset Ivanka bought an island and is making fun of her about it. I think Candace is so jealous. You can see it on her face. Look at her face. It’s so funny. So now she’s blaming Ivanka for Gaza now. And now saying Ivanka is friends with the Rothschilds and has too much money. And hurt kids. And blah blah blah. I remember when Candace said Ivanka was the most beautiful woman she met and so sweet too. I’ll have to find that article. And her husband genocided and the Palestines were killed for a vacation project. Russia good. I don’t know why but hey we had to throw it in there. Russia is really nice guys. We need to visit. PR crisis mode for US weekly. And Erika is putting in ad to slander Candace. I thought about this today. This is epic. Want to know why. Because 99.9% of the US doesn’t watch Candace. So Candace can’t fight it on her podcast because these people don’t watch her. Candace says she doesn’t call anyone. If you want to talk to her you have to call her assistant. She doesn’t answer calls. Ok noted don’t call Candace. You can tell it’s irritating her a lot. Ok we are back to celebrity gossip. Adriana Grande is using Ethan Slader and took him away from his wife and baby. I didn’t even know about this but I don’t follow any of this. For some reason these seems personal for Candace. Candace is your husband stepping out on you? Not only is he gay, an alcoholic but he’s cheating on you? You seem personally invested. Again her audience is complaining they don’t want to hear about it. And that’s all we got. She never talks nice about anyone. Ever notice that? Her audience seemed to tonight. A few called it out. She’s losing her audience.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

20,845 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.James Talarico: “For the past 50 years, the religious right convinced a lot of Christians in America that the two most important issues were abortion and homosexuality. Abortion is never mentioned in scripture. Consensual same-sex relationships are never mentioned. I'm not saying they're not important. I actually think both of those issues are very important. But to focus on those two things instead of feeding the hungry and healing the sick and welcoming the stranger — three things we're told to do ad nauseam in scripture — to me is just mind blowing.”
1:17

.James Talarico: “For the past 50 years, the religious right convinced a lot of Christians in America that the two most important issues were abortion and homosexuality. Abortion is never mentioned in scripture. Consensual same-sex relationships are never mentioned. I'm not saying they're not important. I actually think both of those issues are very important. But to focus on those two things instead of feeding the hungry and healing the sick and welcoming the stranger — three things we're told to do ad nauseam in scripture — to me is just mind blowing.”

Team Talarico

554,572 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I was thinking about that clip from Ally Beth’s podcast when she first addressed Candace’s theories and the massive audience she can weaponize to legitimize them. Ally said that if anyone crossed Candace, she’d retaliate with ten times the force. But look at the reality. Erika Kirk has been nothing but graceful, and the only “offense” on her record is being Charlie’s widow. What exactly did she do to Candace? She’s been so graceful she even flew out to meet Candace in private to address the accusations face to face, exactly the kind of quiet, direct reconciliation Scripture calls Christians to. In the middle of losing her husband, stepping into a role she never asked for, and trying to hold herself together in public, she’s endured slander, accusations, libel, and nonstop degradation. 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁? She hasn’t bad-mouthed Candace. She publicly asked her to stop. She’s shown visible frustration in interviews, but she’s never unleashed even a fraction of the hostility that’s been thrown at her. So this isn’t retaliation for wrongdoing. It’s a one-sided campaign against a grieving woman who refused to play along. This relentless cruelty is a sick obsession.
0:40

I was thinking about that clip from Ally Beth’s podcast when she first addressed Candace’s theories and the massive audience she can weaponize to legitimize them. Ally said that if anyone crossed Candace, she’d retaliate with ten times the force. But look at the reality. Erika Kirk has been nothing but graceful, and the only “offense” on her record is being Charlie’s widow. What exactly did she do to Candace? She’s been so graceful she even flew out to meet Candace in private to address the accusations face to face, exactly the kind of quiet, direct reconciliation Scripture calls Christians to. In the middle of losing her husband, stepping into a role she never asked for, and trying to hold herself together in public, she’s endured slander, accusations, libel, and nonstop degradation. 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁? She hasn’t bad-mouthed Candace. She publicly asked her to stop. She’s shown visible frustration in interviews, but she’s never unleashed even a fraction of the hostility that’s been thrown at her. So this isn’t retaliation for wrongdoing. It’s a one-sided campaign against a grieving woman who refused to play along. This relentless cruelty is a sick obsession.

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

99,132 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This is my facsimile copy of Codex Sinaiticus, the first few major codices like the original this is a photocopy of, are our very first versions of what we today would consider a Genesis to Revelation copy of the Bible. Codex Sinaiticus took upwards of nearly 400 sheep to make and would have cost the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in today’s currency. By the 4th century when this was made, the perspective would have been that this contained the scripture more than that it was scripture. All of these major early codices operated as mini ancient libraries. And all of our earliest examples of them: whether that’s Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Vaticanus, Washingtonianus, etc., have Christian books included within the contents of their covers that we today don’t consider scripture. So it is completely incorrect to claim that early church inclusion in a codex equates to scriptural reception. That’s just not true unless you’re willing to argue books like 4th Maccabees, The Shephered of Hermas, Epistle of Barnabas, and 1st Clement and 2nd Clement, that no church today accepts as scripture, should be included within your Bible. Likewise, the church recognizing books does not mean that their ability to do so gives them the authority. To say that the church gave us our Bible is like saying that the postal service gave you your mail. Your letter carrier is not the progenitor of the mail you receive. Those were written prior to, and even despite, your mail man or woman eventually getting them in your mailbox. The church is the servant and subsidiary of scripture, not the origin. This is why I’ve said in the past that the Bible made the church, the church didn’t make the Bible. Watch the full video: See John Meade’s talk on canon lists:
1:24

This is my facsimile copy of Codex Sinaiticus, the first few major codices like the original this is a photocopy of, are our very first versions of what we today would consider a Genesis to Revelation copy of the Bible. Codex Sinaiticus took upwards of nearly 400 sheep to make and would have cost the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of dollars in today’s currency. By the 4th century when this was made, the perspective would have been that this contained the scripture more than that it was scripture. All of these major early codices operated as mini ancient libraries. And all of our earliest examples of them: whether that’s Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Vaticanus, Washingtonianus, etc., have Christian books included within the contents of their covers that we today don’t consider scripture. So it is completely incorrect to claim that early church inclusion in a codex equates to scriptural reception. That’s just not true unless you’re willing to argue books like 4th Maccabees, The Shephered of Hermas, Epistle of Barnabas, and 1st Clement and 2nd Clement, that no church today accepts as scripture, should be included within your Bible. Likewise, the church recognizing books does not mean that their ability to do so gives them the authority. To say that the church gave us our Bible is like saying that the postal service gave you your mail. Your letter carrier is not the progenitor of the mail you receive. Those were written prior to, and even despite, your mail man or woman eventually getting them in your mailbox. The church is the servant and subsidiary of scripture, not the origin. This is why I’ve said in the past that the Bible made the church, the church didn’t make the Bible. Watch the full video: See John Meade’s talk on canon lists:

Wes Huff

61,298 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

To all these Protestants who claim you are former Catholics, and you say that the Catholic Church taught you not to read the Bible or that you should stay away from the Bible, and that you can't understand it, only the Church can, quit creating calumny and falsehoods. I have literally walked into Mass and they have Bibles out in stands. You can literally contact your diocese and they'll mail you a Bible, as well as the Catechism. I know because I've done it. Vatican II, even the Catechism of the Catholic Church, requires Christians to read the Bible, so just stop with the calumny. There are a lot of things I disagree with in the Catholic Church, but this is not one of them. So stop lying. The Catholic Church teaches to read the Bible. They have study Bibles. They give Bibles out. Calumny is a sin. cc: The Bible In Context needGod.net
0:29

To all these Protestants who claim you are former Catholics, and you say that the Catholic Church taught you not to read the Bible or that you should stay away from the Bible, and that you can't understand it, only the Church can, quit creating calumny and falsehoods. I have literally walked into Mass and they have Bibles out in stands. You can literally contact your diocese and they'll mail you a Bible, as well as the Catechism. I know because I've done it. Vatican II, even the Catechism of the Catholic Church, requires Christians to read the Bible, so just stop with the calumny. There are a lot of things I disagree with in the Catholic Church, but this is not one of them. So stop lying. The Catholic Church teaches to read the Bible. They have study Bibles. They give Bibles out. Calumny is a sin. cc: The Bible In Context needGod.net

Charles Tingler ☧

78,295 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I really don’t care what anyone says, if you are aspiring to be the kind of Christian Candace is instead of the kind of Christian Charlie was you are lost and we should all pray for you. Exodus 20:8 - Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” - Matthew 5:17 It’s evident Candace doesn’t pick up Scripture or read the word of God.
1:36

I really don’t care what anyone says, if you are aspiring to be the kind of Christian Candace is instead of the kind of Christian Charlie was you are lost and we should all pray for you. Exodus 20:8 - Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.” - Matthew 5:17 It’s evident Candace doesn’t pick up Scripture or read the word of God.

Insurrection Barbie

53,289 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Lindsay Snyder, the owner of In-N-Out Burger, recently stated that she would not remove the Bible verses from their products. The Bible verses have always been there, and now some people say they are offended by them. What is this world coming to? If you don’t like it, don’t go to In-N-Out Burger. I personally love that the Bible verses are there.
1:37

Lindsay Snyder, the owner of In-N-Out Burger, recently stated that she would not remove the Bible verses from their products. The Bible verses have always been there, and now some people say they are offended by them. What is this world coming to? If you don’t like it, don’t go to In-N-Out Burger. I personally love that the Bible verses are there.

NancyH

123,204 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten