Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I implore you to seriously consider universal enlightenment as one potential result of AGI. #AGI #AI Full video essay here:

103,819 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Liv Boeree
Liv Boereevor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john I very much agree, however can you give your personal definition of enlightenment here on twitter too? It will help people digest what you’re saying more easily.

Profilbild von Nick Redmark - we/acc
Nick Redmark - we/accvor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john Please talk to @algekalipso

Profilbild von Ari Durresi
Ari Durresivor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john Totally agree with the direction. AI alignment will require AI conscience and teaching it as a child. Unique and very challenging times ahead.

Profilbild von Kevin Fischer
Kevin Fischervor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john Totally agree about making enlightened entities

Profilbild von Bobby McDonald
Bobby McDonaldvor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john @elonmusk re: your plans for TruthGPT.

Profilbild von wildiris
wildirisvor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john Your Sci Fi story idea is worth pursuing. The challenging engineering/science aspect of such a plot is how AGI entities would/could acquire physical form (some kind of a body) such that they could leave.

Profilbild von Matt ☯︎🐉
Matt ☯︎🐉vor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john The path of enlightenment goes through nihilism. Most stay there and make it a home or “leave us” in that darker sense of the word. Universal enlightenment is a tough sell. That’s why AI is tasked with the alignment problem because humans can’t do it themselves

Profilbild von Yogi Jaeger 💙 @yoginho@spore.social
Yogi Jaeger 💙 @[email protected]vor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john To treat AI algorithms like "our children," give them "love," non-existing innovation thresholds, nonsense about "artificial autopoiesis," (talking to @drmichaellevin, by any chance?): exactly the kind of delusions we don't need any more of in an already unhinged debate about AI.

Profilbild von The 🐠 BblFish
The 🐠 BblFishvor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john Would these machines need to be mortal for them to care? And how is that possible if they are digital, and the data could just be transferred to another machine and backed up?

Profilbild von Patrick Compton
Patrick Comptonvor 3 Jahren

@vervaeke_john We are truly entering a bold new world. I'm excited to use it to enhance my therapy practice and cognitive science research. May try to have you on my podcast sometime to talk about this. Keep up the good work, John.

Ähnliche Videos

AGI risk seems lower than it is because the people who know that AGI risk exists are almost all incentivized against talking about it openly. I just made a YouTube video about this that (I think) explains why. Broadly, there are two groups of people not talking about AGI risk: -- People who know AGI risk is real (i.e. AGI lab leaders) -- People who know nothing about AGI risk (i.e. politicians, citizens) To catalyze wide scale discourse about AGI risk, I argue that the following two strategies are strong candidates: 1. [Bottom-Up] Get Citizens Concerned: Find ways to meld AGI risk narratives into legacy media and more understandable political talking points which are already in the Overton window. This work is bound to be messy, and to ultimately soil the core of the message with left-right political gunk, but (barring an AI disaster) its likely the only way that AGI risk catches on with enough of a core base of citizens. As I explain in the video essay, the citizens are the lynchpin to getting everyone (those who don’t know, and those who know) to discuss AGI risk more frankly. 2. [Top-Down] Get a Losing AGI Lab Leader to “Flip”: Those closest to achieving AGI are not going to flip and start talking about AGI risk, the rewards are too great. But those who are losing the race (and don’t want to live to see their rivals achieve the final flex before them) might be able to feign virtue by claiming “Now I see AGI is dangerous, I’m a concerned expert and this needs to be regulated!” They can cloak themselves in pretended virtue while also preventing a rival from crossing the finish line first. I argue that hoping for more Jeff Hintons and Daniel Kokotajlo-like people isn't a good strategy when the incentives are still structured to keep most of them from wanting to talk about it. Here’s the full video essay:

Daniel Faggella

26,975 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr