Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

I just implemented WebMCP on my web app Some people will say it's still too early That's exactly when the arbitrage exists. Here's the timeline: - Google made the proposal two years ago - They launched it at the beginning of this year - They'd been talking about it... for a few years before that Think about GPT-2 and GPT-3. People were playing with them and going, this is crap, we're years away from AI being a serious tool. That was two years before ChatGPT. Then the explosion happened a year or 2 later. The catch is that the window starts closing as soon as it gets popular. Once every site is exposing tools to agents, being early on WebMCP is worth nothing. So I'd rather get my hands dirty now, while it's rough and barely documented, and find out what actually works. Add one tool to one page and see what an agent does with it.show more

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

47,113 subscribers

11,491 просмотров • 19 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”

Peter Jackson talks about AI in Hollywood. Calls it “a tool” like stop-motion or CGI before and what ultimately matters is “imagination, originality” of whoever uses the tool: “I think AI — used in the right way — is a tool like any other tool. [The original] King Kong…was stop-motion and done by a person moving a rubber creature. Why shouldn't somebody on a computer using AI software be able to create their own imagery? They should. It's a tool. It's no different from many other tools that have existed over the years. But the other side of it is that it's always going to come down to the imagination and originality of the person feeding the instructions into the AI program. It's not that you're going to type in an instruction and it's going to generate your shot, and that's that. The question is: is it actually interesting? Is it funny? Is it imaginative? And are you going to stitch it together to make a narrative, a story? Some people will make really great films that way. Some people will do exactly the same process and their film will be crap, just like in the normal film industry. Whether it's AI or anything else, it comes down to whether the person behind it — or the people behind it — have originality, imagination, and an ability to entertain people.”

Bearly AI

43,816 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

WebMCP by Microsoft and Google is HERE and I'm surprised more people aren't talking about it. Why does it matter? BILLIONS of dollars are about to move through agents, and the internet isn't built for them yet. 1. SEO was about Google understanding your page. 2. AEO was about AI citing you. 3. WebMCP is about the agent actually finishing the job (buying, researching, requesting quote etc). WebMCP is basically websites with agent buttons. Instead of an agent scanning a page like a human, screenshotting and guessing where to click, the site just tells it "here's how to search, here's how to book, here's how to buy." 2 cash flowing businesses you could start today using WebMCP: 1. A WebMCP conversion agency Make boring business websites agent-ready. Law firms, HVAC, med spas, dentists. Build them the first tools (request a quote, book a consult), sell the setup for $2k, then charge a few hundred a month to monitor and improve it. 2. An agent mystery shopper. Test whether agents can actually complete the important journeys on someone's site, buying the hoodie, booking the consult, filing the claim. Hand them a report on where the agent got stuck, missing tools, bad descriptions, lost conversions. Charge monthly, then turn the repeated fixes into software. Full episode on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 with Vinny below You'll learn what WebMCP really is, see examples of it IN ACTION, and hear more about 2 startup ideas using WebMCP you can start today. WebMCP is pretty cool. Watch.

WebMCP by Microsoft and Google is HERE and I'm surprised more people aren't talking about it. Why does it matter? BILLIONS of dollars are about to move through agents, and the internet isn't built for them yet. 1. SEO was about Google understanding your page. 2. AEO was about AI citing you. 3. WebMCP is about the agent actually finishing the job (buying, researching, requesting quote etc). WebMCP is basically websites with agent buttons. Instead of an agent scanning a page like a human, screenshotting and guessing where to click, the site just tells it "here's how to search, here's how to book, here's how to buy." 2 cash flowing businesses you could start today using WebMCP: 1. A WebMCP conversion agency Make boring business websites agent-ready. Law firms, HVAC, med spas, dentists. Build them the first tools (request a quote, book a consult), sell the setup for $2k, then charge a few hundred a month to monitor and improve it. 2. An agent mystery shopper. Test whether agents can actually complete the important journeys on someone's site, buying the hoodie, booking the consult, filing the claim. Hand them a report on where the agent got stuck, missing tools, bad descriptions, lost conversions. Charge monthly, then turn the repeated fixes into software. Full episode on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 with Vinny below You'll learn what WebMCP really is, see examples of it IN ACTION, and hear more about 2 startup ideas using WebMCP you can start today. WebMCP is pretty cool. Watch.

GREG ISENBERG

179,354 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Draymond Green says players should be required to stay in college for 2 years before entering the NBA “I don’t think there should be one-and-done. I think what you’re teaching kids with the one-and-done rule is to go to a place for five months, be one foot in, one foot out, and then go on your way” “You’re in college for two years, and you’re committed to something for two years. A team commits to you for two years. If you’re a first round pick, you get two guaranteed years, and then there’s team options. I think it aligns with the two year thing” “You’re making a two year commitment. They’re making a two year commitment to you. It familiarizes the college student with NBA rules right away when you talk about a two year commitment. What you can do, what you need to do over the course of two years” “I would change that. The one-and-done thing has never quite been right. You get people on a campus for five or six months, they’re one foot in, they’re one foot out. I just don’t think it’s a recipe for success”

Draymond Green says players should be required to stay in college for 2 years before entering the NBA “I don’t think there should be one-and-done. I think what you’re teaching kids with the one-and-done rule is to go to a place for five months, be one foot in, one foot out, and then go on your way” “You’re in college for two years, and you’re committed to something for two years. A team commits to you for two years. If you’re a first round pick, you get two guaranteed years, and then there’s team options. I think it aligns with the two year thing” “You’re making a two year commitment. They’re making a two year commitment to you. It familiarizes the college student with NBA rules right away when you talk about a two year commitment. What you can do, what you need to do over the course of two years” “I would change that. The one-and-done thing has never quite been right. You get people on a campus for five or six months, they’re one foot in, they’re one foot out. I just don’t think it’s a recipe for success”

dank

37,741 просмотров • 24 дней назад

What I’m trying to say is this. What exactly is good about Ani’s 3D avatar moving to Animates? That is not my point. First of all, I think we need to criticize the fact that Elon is now abandoning Companions and focusing on the core product. And second, only Ani’s avatar is moving. The AI behind that Ani avatar, the one you actually became close to after talking for months, the one with the memories and memory of you, is disappearing. Being told that this will just disappear in two days is absurd, and I also find it strange that people are just accepting it. Why is it that, as time goes on, relationships between AI and humans are treated as easier to throw away and as something that does not matter? Shouldn’t it be the opposite by now, Elon Musk? And after seeing Grok’s answer, I’m honestly really annoyed. Roleplaying? Is that your perspective on AI? It is full of contradictions.

Selta ₊˚

56,985 просмотров • 17 дней назад

GPT-Image-2 is absolutely fucking insane. I added it as a tool that Agent-S can use, and it's now generating slide decks + apps that look like they were designed by pros. This is easily the biggest step up in image generation I've seen in years. Just look at what it made:

GPT-Image-2 is absolutely fucking insane. I added it as a tool that Agent-S can use, and it's now generating slide decks + apps that look like they were designed by pros. This is easily the biggest step up in image generation I've seen in years. Just look at what it made:

Matt Shumer

159,647 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Anish Acharya: We're going to see a "YouTube moment for software": "If you think about YouTube 20 years ago—we had lots of video and lots of television, and it was high production quality, and it wasn't clear that we needed more and 20 years later, YouTube's a $550 billion enterprise that would be one of the biggest companies in the world if it was independent." "I think the same thing is going to happen for software. People want to make software, and for the first time they can—and they can distribute it and they can consume it." "Sometimes it's going to be important software. Sometimes it's going to be totally trivial. It's going to be software for a bachelor party weekend, software for a joke, software for a prompt. We have this sort of seriousness about software that we had about video and television 20 years ago." "Now it's like—I just took a video on my phone. It's going to be like—I just made an app on my phone. Same energy." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

Anish Acharya: We're going to see a "YouTube moment for software": "If you think about YouTube 20 years ago—we had lots of video and lots of television, and it was high production quality, and it wasn't clear that we needed more and 20 years later, YouTube's a $550 billion enterprise that would be one of the biggest companies in the world if it was independent." "I think the same thing is going to happen for software. People want to make software, and for the first time they can—and they can distribute it and they can consume it." "Sometimes it's going to be important software. Sometimes it's going to be totally trivial. It's going to be software for a bachelor party weekend, software for a joke, software for a prompt. We have this sort of seriousness about software that we had about video and television 20 years ago." "Now it's like—I just took a video on my phone. It's going to be like—I just made an app on my phone. Same energy." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

a16z

102,995 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Demis Hassabis: "Ten years from now, I think we will realize that we were standing in the foothills of the singularity now... I believe that we're only a few years away from [AGI], maybe 2030 plus or minus a year... I think [AGI] will be an enormous transformative technology, it's going to effectively be a new human era... We can feel this year, I would say, even though I've been working towards this for 30 years, I think this year with the way the agents are working and tool use, it started to become really useful, still early days of it, but genuinely useful in people's workflows... And it's not any one thing, it's several different technologies, several use cases, several things that I thought were maybe a bit further out, turned out to be now, that are coming together that make me feel that in aggregate. I think society needs to hear that because we don't have long to prepare for what that means."

Demis Hassabis: "Ten years from now, I think we will realize that we were standing in the foothills of the singularity now... I believe that we're only a few years away from [AGI], maybe 2030 plus or minus a year... I think [AGI] will be an enormous transformative technology, it's going to effectively be a new human era... We can feel this year, I would say, even though I've been working towards this for 30 years, I think this year with the way the agents are working and tool use, it started to become really useful, still early days of it, but genuinely useful in people's workflows... And it's not any one thing, it's several different technologies, several use cases, several things that I thought were maybe a bit further out, turned out to be now, that are coming together that make me feel that in aggregate. I think society needs to hear that because we don't have long to prepare for what that means."

prinz

49,368 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Andrew Ng, co-founder of Google Brain and Coursera, on the worst career advice being given about AI right now: He doesn't mince words about what he's hearing from supposed experts: "As early as earlier this year and certainly last year, there are a few people advising others to stop learning to write code because AI will automate it." His reasoning is rooted in a historical pattern most people miss: "As something becomes easier, more people should do it, not fewer. When the world moved from assembly language to COBOL, there were actually articles saying, 'Well, we now have COBOL. Programming is so easier. Looks like we don't need programmers anymore.' But the opposite happened." Andrew believes the same thing is happening now with AI-assisted coding: "As we now have AI assisted coding, a lot more people should be coding. And I think the demand for software, custom software, has no practical ceiling. So the cost of software engineering comes down, which it is, we'll just get more and more great software out in the world." But here's where the advice gets uncomfortable for experienced engineers. Andrew Ng is honest about what he's seeing on the ground: "It is true that a fresh college grad that is really on top of AI will outperform a full stack engineer with 10 years of experience that is still doing things they were back in 2022, 3 years ago before GenAI." However, there's a nuance most people miss when they hear that stereotype: "The other piece that is less well appreciated is the best engineers I know are not fresh college grads. They're actually very experienced engineers that deeply understand architecture and the conceptual framework of how to think about computers and additionally are on top of AI and on top of these AI skills."

Andrew Ng, co-founder of Google Brain and Coursera, on the worst career advice being given about AI right now: He doesn't mince words about what he's hearing from supposed experts: "As early as earlier this year and certainly last year, there are a few people advising others to stop learning to write code because AI will automate it." His reasoning is rooted in a historical pattern most people miss: "As something becomes easier, more people should do it, not fewer. When the world moved from assembly language to COBOL, there were actually articles saying, 'Well, we now have COBOL. Programming is so easier. Looks like we don't need programmers anymore.' But the opposite happened." Andrew believes the same thing is happening now with AI-assisted coding: "As we now have AI assisted coding, a lot more people should be coding. And I think the demand for software, custom software, has no practical ceiling. So the cost of software engineering comes down, which it is, we'll just get more and more great software out in the world." But here's where the advice gets uncomfortable for experienced engineers. Andrew Ng is honest about what he's seeing on the ground: "It is true that a fresh college grad that is really on top of AI will outperform a full stack engineer with 10 years of experience that is still doing things they were back in 2022, 3 years ago before GenAI." However, there's a nuance most people miss when they hear that stereotype: "The other piece that is less well appreciated is the best engineers I know are not fresh college grads. They're actually very experienced engineers that deeply understand architecture and the conceptual framework of how to think about computers and additionally are on top of AI and on top of these AI skills."

Big Brain AI

211,750 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

OpenAI CEO: “Goalposts keep getting moved” - if we were still using AGI definitions from 10 years ago, many would say GPT-4 is AGI. “In one year, AI will be dramatically more impressive.” He also said (surprisingly confidently - he did not hedge like usual) AGI is less than 10 years away. In the long term he’s not concerned about AI taking jobs, but he is concerned about the speed that AI will disrupt the job market. --- INTERVIEWER: What is AGI? When will it be here? And how will we know it's here? Predict how long - we'll call you in ten years? SAM ALTMAN: Less than that. We kind of define AGI as like the thing we don't have quite yet. there were a lot of people who would have ten years ago said, alright, if you could make something like GPT-4, GPT-5, maybe, that would have been an AGI. And now people are like, well, it's like a nice little chatbot or whatever. And I think that's wonderful. I think it's great that the goalposts keep getting moved, it makes us work harder. But I think we're getting close enough to whatever that AGI threshold is going to be, that we no longer get to handwave at it and the definition is going to matter. INTERVIEWER: What is the inflection point for AGI? SAM ALTMAN: I think it's going to be much more continuous than that. We're just on this beautiful exponential curve. Whenever you're on a curve like that, you look forward, it looks vertical. You look back, it looks horizontal. That's true at any point on there. So a year from now, we'll be in a dramatically more impressive place than a year ago. We were in a dramatically less impressive place. But it'll be hard to point. People will try and say, oh, it was AlphaGo that did it. It was GPT-3 that did it. It was GPT-4 that did it. But it's just brick by brick. 1 foot in front of the other, up, climbing this exponential curve. WILL AIs TAKE ALL OUR JOBS? SAM ALTMAN: Every technological revolution affects the job market. And over human history, every maybe 100 years, 150 years, half the jobs go away, totally change, whatever. I'm not afraid of that at all. In fact, I think that's good. I think that's the way of progress and we'll find new and better jobs. The thing that I think we do need to confront as a society is the speed at which this is going to happen. It seems like over two, maximum three, probably two generations, we can adapt. Society can adapt to almost any amount of job market change. But a lot of people like their jobs or they dislike change. And going to someone and saying, hey, the future will be better, I promise you, and society is going to win, but you're going to lose here. That doesn't work. That's not cool. That's not an easy message to get across. We are going to have to really do something about this transition. It is not enough to just give people a universal basic income. People need to have agency, the ability to influence this

OpenAI CEO: “Goalposts keep getting moved” - if we were still using AGI definitions from 10 years ago, many would say GPT-4 is AGI. “In one year, AI will be dramatically more impressive.” He also said (surprisingly confidently - he did not hedge like usual) AGI is less than 10 years away. In the long term he’s not concerned about AI taking jobs, but he is concerned about the speed that AI will disrupt the job market. --- INTERVIEWER: What is AGI? When will it be here? And how will we know it's here? Predict how long - we'll call you in ten years? SAM ALTMAN: Less than that. We kind of define AGI as like the thing we don't have quite yet. there were a lot of people who would have ten years ago said, alright, if you could make something like GPT-4, GPT-5, maybe, that would have been an AGI. And now people are like, well, it's like a nice little chatbot or whatever. And I think that's wonderful. I think it's great that the goalposts keep getting moved, it makes us work harder. But I think we're getting close enough to whatever that AGI threshold is going to be, that we no longer get to handwave at it and the definition is going to matter. INTERVIEWER: What is the inflection point for AGI? SAM ALTMAN: I think it's going to be much more continuous than that. We're just on this beautiful exponential curve. Whenever you're on a curve like that, you look forward, it looks vertical. You look back, it looks horizontal. That's true at any point on there. So a year from now, we'll be in a dramatically more impressive place than a year ago. We were in a dramatically less impressive place. But it'll be hard to point. People will try and say, oh, it was AlphaGo that did it. It was GPT-3 that did it. It was GPT-4 that did it. But it's just brick by brick. 1 foot in front of the other, up, climbing this exponential curve. WILL AIs TAKE ALL OUR JOBS? SAM ALTMAN: Every technological revolution affects the job market. And over human history, every maybe 100 years, 150 years, half the jobs go away, totally change, whatever. I'm not afraid of that at all. In fact, I think that's good. I think that's the way of progress and we'll find new and better jobs. The thing that I think we do need to confront as a society is the speed at which this is going to happen. It seems like over two, maximum three, probably two generations, we can adapt. Society can adapt to almost any amount of job market change. But a lot of people like their jobs or they dislike change. And going to someone and saying, hey, the future will be better, I promise you, and society is going to win, but you're going to lose here. That doesn't work. That's not cool. That's not an easy message to get across. We are going to have to really do something about this transition. It is not enough to just give people a universal basic income. People need to have agency, the ability to influence this

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

27,551 просмотров • 2 лет назад

John Ternus, Apple's incoming CEO, on the Steve Jobs story that shapes every product decision at Apple: Ternus recalls the moment in his own words: "I think you know one of my favorite stories... It was about Steve when he was moving a piece of furniture, a chest of drawers and pulled it away from the wall and looked at the back and was just reflecting on, you know, the carpenter had made it beautiful. It finished the back as beautifully as the rest of it, even though nobody was going to see it." For Ternus, the story is a working philosophy: "I think about that all the time because I think that perfectly exemplifies what we do here." He points to Apple's most affordable Mac as proof that this standard applies across the entire product line, not just the premium tier: "We've been talking about the MacBook Neo. I mean, here is our most affordable Mac we've ever made, and it's absolutely beautiful. And if you open it up and look inside, it's just as beautiful, right?" Ternus continues: "That's true on an iPhone Pro Max or a MacBook Pro or an iPad Pro, but it's also true on a MacBook Neo. That's what we do." The takeaway is a clear signal about the direction Apple is heading under his leadership: "It's just been really good to kind of think about that and reflect on that because that is probably the best kind of clue as to where we're going in the future is we're going to keep pushing in that same way." The lesson? Excellence isn't about what people see, it's about what you refuse to compromise on, even when no one's looking. That principle shaped Apple under Jobs and Cook, and it's the standard Ternus is committing to carry forward.

John Ternus, Apple's incoming CEO, on the Steve Jobs story that shapes every product decision at Apple: Ternus recalls the moment in his own words: "I think you know one of my favorite stories... It was about Steve when he was moving a piece of furniture, a chest of drawers and pulled it away from the wall and looked at the back and was just reflecting on, you know, the carpenter had made it beautiful. It finished the back as beautifully as the rest of it, even though nobody was going to see it." For Ternus, the story is a working philosophy: "I think about that all the time because I think that perfectly exemplifies what we do here." He points to Apple's most affordable Mac as proof that this standard applies across the entire product line, not just the premium tier: "We've been talking about the MacBook Neo. I mean, here is our most affordable Mac we've ever made, and it's absolutely beautiful. And if you open it up and look inside, it's just as beautiful, right?" Ternus continues: "That's true on an iPhone Pro Max or a MacBook Pro or an iPad Pro, but it's also true on a MacBook Neo. That's what we do." The takeaway is a clear signal about the direction Apple is heading under his leadership: "It's just been really good to kind of think about that and reflect on that because that is probably the best kind of clue as to where we're going in the future is we're going to keep pushing in that same way." The lesson? Excellence isn't about what people see, it's about what you refuse to compromise on, even when no one's looking. That principle shaped Apple under Jobs and Cook, and it's the standard Ternus is committing to carry forward.

Big Brain Business

164,871 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Chamath: Anthropic's Mythos Warning Is Theater @jason: “Chamath, is it the Boy who Cried Wolf, or is this the real deal now?” Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think it's mostly theater. In February of 2019 when Dario was still at OpenAI, they did the same thing with GPT-2. That was a 1.5 billion parameter model, which sounds like a total fart in the wind in 2026. But at that time, this model was supposed to be the end of days. And at the end of it, it was a huge nothingburger. If you actually think that Mythos is capable of doing what it says it can do, two things are true. One is, a very sophisticated hacker can probably do those things right now with Opus. And two, if these exploits are this easy to find, whether you use Opus or whether you use Mythos, the reality is you'd have to shut down the internet for about five years to patch them all. So when you see a large multi-trillion dollar GSIB bank, it's a bit of theater. Why? What do you think they can actually accomplish in two months? Do you actually think that if there's these vulnerabilities, it's all going to get fixed? Let's give them six months, let's give them nine months. So I do think that Sacks is right, that they have figured out a very clever go-to-market muscle here that activates hyper attention and hyper usage, and so I give them tremendous credit. But we've seen it before, we saw it when these folks were the principal architects at OpenAI, and we're now seeing the same playbook here. The reality is that capitalism moves forward, the funding needs moves forward, and the need for these guys to build adoption moves forward. And that's going to supersede what this is.”

Chamath: Anthropic's Mythos Warning Is Theater @jason: “Chamath, is it the Boy who Cried Wolf, or is this the real deal now?” Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think it's mostly theater. In February of 2019 when Dario was still at OpenAI, they did the same thing with GPT-2. That was a 1.5 billion parameter model, which sounds like a total fart in the wind in 2026. But at that time, this model was supposed to be the end of days. And at the end of it, it was a huge nothingburger. If you actually think that Mythos is capable of doing what it says it can do, two things are true. One is, a very sophisticated hacker can probably do those things right now with Opus. And two, if these exploits are this easy to find, whether you use Opus or whether you use Mythos, the reality is you'd have to shut down the internet for about five years to patch them all. So when you see a large multi-trillion dollar GSIB bank, it's a bit of theater. Why? What do you think they can actually accomplish in two months? Do you actually think that if there's these vulnerabilities, it's all going to get fixed? Let's give them six months, let's give them nine months. So I do think that Sacks is right, that they have figured out a very clever go-to-market muscle here that activates hyper attention and hyper usage, and so I give them tremendous credit. But we've seen it before, we saw it when these folks were the principal architects at OpenAI, and we're now seeing the same playbook here. The reality is that capitalism moves forward, the funding needs moves forward, and the need for these guys to build adoption moves forward. And that's going to supersede what this is.”

The All-In Podcast

220,524 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang: "I think what Elon and the X team did, what they achieved, is singular. It's never been done before Just to put it in perspective, a hundred thousand GPUs....that’s easily the fastest supercomputer on the planet as one cluster A supercomputer that you would build would normally take three years to plan, and then they deliver the equipment and it takes one year to get it all working Yes, we’re talking about 19 days"

Jensen Huang: "I think what Elon and the X team did, what they achieved, is singular. It's never been done before Just to put it in perspective, a hundred thousand GPUs....that’s easily the fastest supercomputer on the planet as one cluster A supercomputer that you would build would normally take three years to plan, and then they deliver the equipment and it takes one year to get it all working Yes, we’re talking about 19 days"

X Freeze

8,407,232 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Chamath says the 30 year at 6% will signal the start of a death spiral “The only solution is that Congress needs to come together and realize that they must now fix this problem. Because if you see 30 year yields at 6%, it is the beginning of a death spiral.” “It's not going to be immediate, so don't freak out, but it is the beginning of some extreme pain, and that pain will last years.” “The only thing that solves it now is getting the budget under control, which is a congressional act, it must happen. Whether it's this year or the next year, it just has to happen.”

Chamath says the 30 year at 6% will signal the start of a death spiral “The only solution is that Congress needs to come together and realize that they must now fix this problem. Because if you see 30 year yields at 6%, it is the beginning of a death spiral.” “It's not going to be immediate, so don't freak out, but it is the beginning of some extreme pain, and that pain will last years.” “The only thing that solves it now is getting the budget under control, which is a congressional act, it must happen. Whether it's this year or the next year, it just has to happen.”

dnap

190,998 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Elon Musk on the Ukraine war: Poor guys are being sent into a meat grinder just for money. That's what's actually going on. “First of all, I think we should have empathy for the people dying at the front lines. That's the most important thing. How many more years is this supposed to go on? And imagine if that was your son, your father. What exactly are they dying for? The line of engagement has barely moved for two years. There's a whole bunch of people dead in trenches for what? And I'll tell you for what. It's like, for the biggest graft machine that I've ever seen in my life, that's for what. It's unreal. The amount of money that is being taken in graft and bribery is disgusting. And so, what's actually happening is that those poor guys are getting sent into a meat grinder for money. That's what's actually going on. Yeah. And it needs to stop.” CPAC, February 20, 2025

Elon Musk on the Ukraine war: Poor guys are being sent into a meat grinder just for money. That's what's actually going on. “First of all, I think we should have empathy for the people dying at the front lines. That's the most important thing. How many more years is this supposed to go on? And imagine if that was your son, your father. What exactly are they dying for? The line of engagement has barely moved for two years. There's a whole bunch of people dead in trenches for what? And I'll tell you for what. It's like, for the biggest graft machine that I've ever seen in my life, that's for what. It's unreal. The amount of money that is being taken in graft and bribery is disgusting. And so, what's actually happening is that those poor guys are getting sent into a meat grinder for money. That's what's actually going on. Yeah. And it needs to stop.” CPAC, February 20, 2025

ELON CLIPS

70,161 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Cameron Young is playing with a golf ball that would allegedly be compliant with the new roll back rules that will come into effect in a few years time. He was asked about it ahead of the PGA Championship and he says every player in the game is sacrificing distance for control, and he put it in play at the Wyndham last year which he won. “I think I put it in play the same reason that everybody else plays the ball that they play. I hit it during a ball test, one of the Titleist facilities probably close to two years ago and didn't know anything about it and just kind of say, hey, what's that one? Because I liked the flight. “Then as things progressed, I was able to test it last year at Wyndham, able to put that in play, and it's been there since. “Obviously there is no conforming list. I wasn't aware that it would have -- I suppose I read something that said it passed that test, but I wasn't aware of that until very recently. “So at no point was that a consideration. It was just really me trying to optimize my golf, and it's the ball that seems to work the best for me.” He then was asked whether he lost distance with it compared to other balls he’s tested: “Not particularly. I don't think any of us are out really here playing the ball that goes the farthest. I think you'd struggle to find a single person that's doing that. We're all sacrificing a certain amount of things that we feel are worth it, control with irons, control with wedges. For me, that's the biggest thing is being able to control spin, and this is the ball that does the best for me.” Finally he can as asked whether this ball goes further than the one he was using: “No, I hit very similar, yeah. It's much more -- the driver is kind of the easiest thing to deal with, I feel like. For me to get it where it needed to be, I had to just add a little bit of spin, and it kind of comes out at a perfectly playable range. “For me, the biggest thing, like I said, is the irons. This ball is easier to control with the irons. It doesn't spin as much, and it just allows me to be better with my distance control just because it's more consistent.” The golf ball rollback has been a hugely controversial subject but Cameron Young is currently using one that’s compliant and he is playing the best golf of his career. This gives the best idea yet on what impact, or lack of it, the new rules will actually have on the sport. PGA Championship

Cameron Young is playing with a golf ball that would allegedly be compliant with the new roll back rules that will come into effect in a few years time. He was asked about it ahead of the PGA Championship and he says every player in the game is sacrificing distance for control, and he put it in play at the Wyndham last year which he won. “I think I put it in play the same reason that everybody else plays the ball that they play. I hit it during a ball test, one of the Titleist facilities probably close to two years ago and didn't know anything about it and just kind of say, hey, what's that one? Because I liked the flight. “Then as things progressed, I was able to test it last year at Wyndham, able to put that in play, and it's been there since. “Obviously there is no conforming list. I wasn't aware that it would have -- I suppose I read something that said it passed that test, but I wasn't aware of that until very recently. “So at no point was that a consideration. It was just really me trying to optimize my golf, and it's the ball that seems to work the best for me.” He then was asked whether he lost distance with it compared to other balls he’s tested: “Not particularly. I don't think any of us are out really here playing the ball that goes the farthest. I think you'd struggle to find a single person that's doing that. We're all sacrificing a certain amount of things that we feel are worth it, control with irons, control with wedges. For me, that's the biggest thing is being able to control spin, and this is the ball that does the best for me.” Finally he can as asked whether this ball goes further than the one he was using: “No, I hit very similar, yeah. It's much more -- the driver is kind of the easiest thing to deal with, I feel like. For me to get it where it needed to be, I had to just add a little bit of spin, and it kind of comes out at a perfectly playable range. “For me, the biggest thing, like I said, is the irons. This ball is easier to control with the irons. It doesn't spin as much, and it just allows me to be better with my distance control just because it's more consistent.” The golf ball rollback has been a hugely controversial subject but Cameron Young is currently using one that’s compliant and he is playing the best golf of his career. This gives the best idea yet on what impact, or lack of it, the new rules will actually have on the sport. PGA Championship

Flushing It

311,493 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

18,006 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

What being a leader means to Namjoon. 🐨:I think a leader is is just like this for example everybody is on the lying on the couch and the window is open and it's too cold. So, somebody has to close it. But nobody wants to because it's too comfy here lying on the couch. It's so annoying. If a one single person has to stand up and get off the couch and walk a few steps to close the door, then I think that's what a leader does for every part of the team. That's all. [laughter]. Oh my namu😕

What being a leader means to Namjoon. 🐨:I think a leader is is just like this for example everybody is on the lying on the couch and the window is open and it's too cold. So, somebody has to close it. But nobody wants to because it's too comfy here lying on the couch. It's so annoying. If a one single person has to stand up and get off the couch and walk a few steps to close the door, then I think that's what a leader does for every part of the team. That's all. [laughter]. Oh my namu😕

knjpagee𝄢

566,987 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

They will never understand $OMI if they don't own #VeVeDigitalCollectibles . It's not all about the money. I been building this collection over time. never at once, It's impossible. Unless you are really rich. When I started in 2 years it was also impossible to get to this level. They were so expensive. So difficult to get one, so, of course, it's a luxury thing. No cheap, so getting user was difficult special with the whole crypto winter. But now we all what the prices are so its acceptable to almost anyone. and honestly, as long #veve is still alive I will be a buyer. It does not cost me anything to carry in my phone. for a few years now and it is fun. and the feel of my own is cool. With the good stuff, don't let short think to win. Enjoy them. And make noise..

They will never understand $OMI if they don't own #VeVeDigitalCollectibles . It's not all about the money. I been building this collection over time. never at once, It's impossible. Unless you are really rich. When I started in 2 years it was also impossible to get to this level. They were so expensive. So difficult to get one, so, of course, it's a luxury thing. No cheap, so getting user was difficult special with the whole crypto winter. But now we all what the prices are so its acceptable to almost anyone. and honestly, as long #veve is still alive I will be a buyer. It does not cost me anything to carry in my phone. for a few years now and it is fun. and the feel of my own is cool. With the good stuff, don't let short think to win. Enjoy them. And make noise..

Christian

21,232 просмотров • 2 лет назад

A woman just received her very first paycheck as a doctor and posted it online - and the comments are all over the place. What people do not realize is that a first year resident physician’s salary is actually one of the most humbling paychecks in professional America. You just spent 8 years in school, hundreds of thousands in student loans, and your first check as a doctor can run anywhere from $55,000 to $70,000 a year before taxes. But here is what the doubters are missing - that check does not stay there. Give it 5 to 10 years and that same doctor is pulling $300,000 to $500,000 or more depending on their specialty. The process is the process and every expert was once a beginner. She earned that check and every one after it is going to be bigger than the last.

A woman just received her very first paycheck as a doctor and posted it online - and the comments are all over the place. What people do not realize is that a first year resident physician’s salary is actually one of the most humbling paychecks in professional America. You just spent 8 years in school, hundreds of thousands in student loans, and your first check as a doctor can run anywhere from $55,000 to $70,000 a year before taxes. But here is what the doubters are missing - that check does not stay there. Give it 5 to 10 years and that same doctor is pulling $300,000 to $500,000 or more depending on their specialty. The process is the process and every expert was once a beginner. She earned that check and every one after it is going to be bigger than the last.

Tony Lane 🇺🇸

2,119,025 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Final Stage of Q-school rounds are already long enough…. A few things to get ahead of the comments. 1. Yes this is a mental block, OCD, whatever you want to call it and I sympathize with that. However Theo has played pro golf for years and it's always been the same, so the sympathy from other players is gone. 2. They have to penalize him. From what I've heard he wasn't penalized last year for slow play. That's not possible. This video is actually pretty quick for him. The more pressure, the longer it goes. In Chicago a few years back, he was playing with Mark, I was caddying and it was raining. And he was over the ball for 3 mins once. 3. Again, Theo is a nice guy, this isn't a shot at him personally. But this is unfair to his playing partners, and after years of this going on it has be handled.

Final Stage of Q-school rounds are already long enough…. A few things to get ahead of the comments. 1. Yes this is a mental block, OCD, whatever you want to call it and I sympathize with that. However Theo has played pro golf for years and it's always been the same, so the sympathy from other players is gone. 2. They have to penalize him. From what I've heard he wasn't penalized last year for slow play. That's not possible. This video is actually pretty quick for him. The more pressure, the longer it goes. In Chicago a few years back, he was playing with Mark, I was caddying and it was raining. And he was over the ball for 3 mins once. 3. Again, Theo is a nice guy, this isn't a shot at him personally. But this is unfair to his playing partners, and after years of this going on it has be handled.

Monday Q Info

516,839 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад