Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

I questioned representatives from AHPRA regarding their heavy-handed and unjustified actions against Dr Amos, an academic psychiatrist from North Queensland. On 26 February 2026, the Medical Board of Australia slapped immediate restrictions on Dr Amos's medical registration, banning him from patient contact and social media commentary on gender. This... move was triggered by just four complaints (three were anonymous and none were from patients) concerning three X posts — one questioning whether trans identification can be differentiated from psychosis and another using biological pronouns during an exchange. When I pressed Mr Untersteiner on what specific parts of those posts allegedly posed a "serious risk to public health and safety" to justify an immediate action order, he hid behind confidentiality provisions and refused to discuss individual cases. Even with support from Senator Henderson challenging their secrecy, the agency repeatedly dodged direct questions. When I asked Dr Orchard whether a health practitioner has the right to refer to biological sex, or if doing so constitutes discrimination, they hid behind vague codes of conduct and social media guidelines instead of giving a straight answer. AHPRA claims they only intervene when debate crosses into hate or discrimination, yet they couldn't provide a clear set of guidelines defining what they actually consider "misinformation." I questioned their process of issuing severe penalties before facts are even established or investigations conducted, ultimately destroying doctors' careers over anonymous complaints and standard public commentary.show more

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

168,270 subscribers

219,551 просмотров • 9 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Образование Здоровье и велнес Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Senator Malcolm Roberts: Does a health practitioner have the right to refer to a trans person's biological sex? Justin Untersteiner, Chief Executive Officer at Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA): I'm struggling a little bit with that question in regard to our role as, uh, the regulator. I don't know... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Is it discrimination for a health practitioner to refer to a person's biological sex? Is it discrimination? Dr. Jamie Orchard, AHPRA's General Counsel: In respect of public comments by practitioners, you've heard earlier the discussion around the right of free speech and the fact that AHPRA and the boards are committed to those ideals, but there are limits to free speech and how people express themselves. Senator Malcolm Roberts: How can a doctor fulfill their ethical obligation to inform the public of potential harms of gender interventions and gender ideology without being accused of discrimination against LGBTIQA+ people? Justin Untersteiner: We will intervene where this goes beyond a debate about clinical pathways and treatments and moves into a place of hate or discrimination against individuals or groups. And again, I see firsthand the harm that discrimination and hate causes the community... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Medical Board of Australia's immediate action orders are implemented before the facts are established and before an investigation occurs. Is it reasonable to destroy a doctor's career for three social media posts without conducting an investigation? Three anonymous complaints, no patient complaints.

Senator Malcolm Roberts: Does a health practitioner have the right to refer to a trans person's biological sex? Justin Untersteiner, Chief Executive Officer at Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA): I'm struggling a little bit with that question in regard to our role as, uh, the regulator. I don't know... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Is it discrimination for a health practitioner to refer to a person's biological sex? Is it discrimination? Dr. Jamie Orchard, AHPRA's General Counsel: In respect of public comments by practitioners, you've heard earlier the discussion around the right of free speech and the fact that AHPRA and the boards are committed to those ideals, but there are limits to free speech and how people express themselves. Senator Malcolm Roberts: How can a doctor fulfill their ethical obligation to inform the public of potential harms of gender interventions and gender ideology without being accused of discrimination against LGBTIQA+ people? Justin Untersteiner: We will intervene where this goes beyond a debate about clinical pathways and treatments and moves into a place of hate or discrimination against individuals or groups. And again, I see firsthand the harm that discrimination and hate causes the community... Senator Malcolm Roberts: Medical Board of Australia's immediate action orders are implemented before the facts are established and before an investigation occurs. Is it reasonable to destroy a doctor's career for three social media posts without conducting an investigation? Three anonymous complaints, no patient complaints.

Genevieve Gluck

36,615 просмотров • 9 дней назад

During my second session with AHPRA, I asked their representatives about their neutrality, bureaucratic overreach and entanglement with radical ideological and political advocacy groups. When I asked whether AHPRA caseworkers even possess the basic competence to distinguish between a psychoanalytic view of psychosis and a genuine psychotic disorder, or whether they're weaponising ignorance to take unwarranted action against doctors, he could not provide an answer and took it on notice. More importantly, I am extremely concerned about AHPRA’s institutional alignment with politicised organisations such as ACON and its Pride in Diversity program, including their active membership and participation in the Australian Workplace Equality Index. Despite admitting that no formal assessment has ever been conducted to evaluate whether these ideological partnerships create actual or perceived conflicts of interest, Mr Untersteiner hid behind procedural bureaucracy and evasive talking points. When asked how AHPRA can possibly claim to be an independent, unbiased regulator while paying to participate in programs designed to push progressive inclusion agendas, they dodged my questions, basically admitting they have no defence for the exorbitant legal costs hardworking Australian doctors face when forced to defend themselves against unaccountable regulators. Watch the whole session here:

During my second session with AHPRA, I asked their representatives about their neutrality, bureaucratic overreach and entanglement with radical ideological and political advocacy groups. When I asked whether AHPRA caseworkers even possess the basic competence to distinguish between a psychoanalytic view of psychosis and a genuine psychotic disorder, or whether they're weaponising ignorance to take unwarranted action against doctors, he could not provide an answer and took it on notice. More importantly, I am extremely concerned about AHPRA’s institutional alignment with politicised organisations such as ACON and its Pride in Diversity program, including their active membership and participation in the Australian Workplace Equality Index. Despite admitting that no formal assessment has ever been conducted to evaluate whether these ideological partnerships create actual or perceived conflicts of interest, Mr Untersteiner hid behind procedural bureaucracy and evasive talking points. When asked how AHPRA can possibly claim to be an independent, unbiased regulator while paying to participate in programs designed to push progressive inclusion agendas, they dodged my questions, basically admitting they have no defence for the exorbitant legal costs hardworking Australian doctors face when forced to defend themselves against unaccountable regulators. Watch the whole session here:

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

21,819 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Flock Safety Cameras sent a cease and desist letter to an American saying he must stop making social media posts about them Flock threatens legal action if he posts anything on social media they deem “fake news” WOW “I have received a cease and desist from Flock Cameras, and they said if I make any more posts telling my fans to put f*ck Flock stickers on camera, then I will get pursued with legal action. And I can't make any more false or fake news posts — They said no more f*cking talking bad” I looked it up and they can’t enforce the social media post threats The cease and desist letter is legal, but it has limits on what Flock can actually enforce: They cannot outright ban you from posting on social media or criticizing them. The First Amendment protects your right to free speech, including negative opinions, memes and commentary about public companies and products So no they cannot enforce this, however They can sue if your posts cross into: - Defamation, meaning provably false statements causing harm, not just opinions like “F*ck Flock” - Incitement to vandalism like encouraging illegal damage to their property According to Grok: Cease and desist letters are common “scare tactics” used by companies to deter criticism. Many are overbroad and not fully enforceable

Flock Safety Cameras sent a cease and desist letter to an American saying he must stop making social media posts about them Flock threatens legal action if he posts anything on social media they deem “fake news” WOW “I have received a cease and desist from Flock Cameras, and they said if I make any more posts telling my fans to put fck Flock stickers on camera, then I will get pursued with legal action. And I can't make any more false or fake news posts — They said no more fcking talking bad” I looked it up and they can’t enforce the social media post threats The cease and desist letter is legal, but it has limits on what Flock can actually enforce: They cannot outright ban you from posting on social media or criticizing them. The First Amendment protects your right to free speech, including negative opinions, memes and commentary about public companies and products So no they cannot enforce this, however They can sue if your posts cross into: - Defamation, meaning provably false statements causing harm, not just opinions like “F*ck Flock” - Incitement to vandalism like encouraging illegal damage to their property According to Grok: Cease and desist letters are common “scare tactics” used by companies to deter criticism. Many are overbroad and not fully enforceable

Wall Street Apes

263,823 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Another defamation case in the works? Ok. Will not apologize. Will not delete. But will apologise and delete if: 1) Institution of national repute will put out a public statement that they will ensure all patients - from all wakes of life will be treated with evidence-based scientific medicine without prejudice and not Ayurvedic quackery. If the patient wants Ayurvedic quackery then the doctors must counsel them on cons of the treatment because there are no pros. The final decision can be with the patient after a wholesome discussion. 2) Call back this patient with bipolar (see last video l) who received toxic ayurvedic products as part of bipolar mania treatment and provide actual guidelines based medical care. 3) Ayurveda practitioners who prescribed the set of herbals to the bipolar patient must show evidence for their treatment from classical as well as modern medical literature, mechanism of action, dosing studies, safety profile of each herbal and multi herbal combinations in this group of patients. The amount of abuses and harassment that alumni of NIMHANS showered on my Instagram was quite a lot. They were all worried about the "name" of their institute getting tarnished...NOT A SINGLE DOCTOR from NIMHANS reached out or responded asking how the patient was or about the atrocity committed against the patient. Not one. Patients do not go to NIMHANS for Ayurvedic treatment. If real doctors don't stand up for their patients, then who will? I know doctors who work in NIMHANS and such government run institutes are held hostage and scared. But I am not, because I am only concerned about patients and their family. And their right to healthcare. I vehemently stand against integrative quackery. And every doctor should too, if they have an iota of conscience and humanism left for their patients, past-present-and future.

TheLiverDoc™

42,797 просмотров • 1 год назад

An anonymous dietitian got an Australian surgeon banned from talking about food. Dr. Gary Fettke. Senior orthopedic surgeon. Launceston, Tasmania. He amputates the consequences of type 2 diabetes for a living. Feet. Toes. Legs. He spent years watching the same patients come back. The official high-carb diabetic diet was feeding the disease. So he started telling them: cut sugar. Cut refined carbs. Eat real food. An anonymous dietitian reported him to AHPRA, Australia's medical regulator. The charge: giving nutritional advice outside his scope of practice. AHPRA's exact words to him: "There is nothing associated with your medical training or education that makes you an expert or authority in the field of nutrition, diabetes or cancer." The investigation ran two and a half years. Zero patient harm. Zero patient complaints. November 2016. They cautioned him anyway. He was forbidden from giving any nutritional advice. To anyone. Even patients about to lose a limb. He refused to back down. The science was on his side. So was every patient he had ever treated. #isupportgary built into a movement. October 3, 2018. AHPRA dropped every allegation. Apologized in writing. Four and a half years after the original complaint. They didn't beat him with science. They tried to beat him with bureaucracy. He outlasted it. The body listens to what you feed it. The medical board listens to dietitians. Choose carefully who you listen to. #NoSugarNoGrains #VinnieTortorich #GaryFettke #isupportgary #AHPRA #LowCarb #Type2Diabetes #DiabetesReversal #SugarLies #FoodIsMedicine #MedicalFreedom

An anonymous dietitian got an Australian surgeon banned from talking about food. Dr. Gary Fettke. Senior orthopedic surgeon. Launceston, Tasmania. He amputates the consequences of type 2 diabetes for a living. Feet. Toes. Legs. He spent years watching the same patients come back. The official high-carb diabetic diet was feeding the disease. So he started telling them: cut sugar. Cut refined carbs. Eat real food. An anonymous dietitian reported him to AHPRA, Australia's medical regulator. The charge: giving nutritional advice outside his scope of practice. AHPRA's exact words to him: "There is nothing associated with your medical training or education that makes you an expert or authority in the field of nutrition, diabetes or cancer." The investigation ran two and a half years. Zero patient harm. Zero patient complaints. November 2016. They cautioned him anyway. He was forbidden from giving any nutritional advice. To anyone. Even patients about to lose a limb. He refused to back down. The science was on his side. So was every patient he had ever treated. #isupportgary built into a movement. October 3, 2018. AHPRA dropped every allegation. Apologized in writing. Four and a half years after the original complaint. They didn't beat him with science. They tried to beat him with bureaucracy. He outlasted it. The body listens to what you feed it. The medical board listens to dietitians. Choose carefully who you listen to. #NoSugarNoGrains #VinnieTortorich #GaryFettke #isupportgary #AHPRA #LowCarb #Type2Diabetes #DiabetesReversal #SugarLies #FoodIsMedicine #MedicalFreedom

Vinnie Tortorich

41,203 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“I swear to God, I’ll never get over what happened.” “It was criminal from A to Z.” Dr. Jessica Rose breaks down why we cannot just “move on” from Covid. “Dozens of medical professionals and people doing off-label trials in their own clinics all over the world were telling [Trump], ‘These drugs are working,’ and hydroxychloroquine was one of them.” But public health bureaucrats refused every possible solution. Why? “Because if there’s a solution, we won’t be able to EUA these new experimental products.” “That’s what happened, and they went right down the line with it, right to the childhood schedule so that they could make these stupid things liability-free.” Jeffrey A Tucker Jessica Rose 🤙

“I swear to God, I’ll never get over what happened.” “It was criminal from A to Z.” Dr. Jessica Rose breaks down why we cannot just “move on” from Covid. “Dozens of medical professionals and people doing off-label trials in their own clinics all over the world were telling [Trump], ‘These drugs are working,’ and hydroxychloroquine was one of them.” But public health bureaucrats refused every possible solution. Why? “Because if there’s a solution, we won’t be able to EUA these new experimental products.” “That’s what happened, and they went right down the line with it, right to the childhood schedule so that they could make these stupid things liability-free.” Jeffrey A Tucker Jessica Rose 🤙

Brownstone Institute

48,625 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Obviously, the media want to recycle and print the same lies as a few years back, and people are believing it. All charges were dropped in this incident as I was the one who was attacked by 2 drunk women and tried to get away on three separate occasions. Over ten years ago, even though the police saw the CCTV, I was still charged with punching, kicking, and pulling a girl’s hair, but this is the CCTV footage from when I was attacked, and thankfully, when the judge watched it, all the charges were dropped as they were the aggressor, as I was the one trying to get away from the situation on three separate occasions, and I even had to run away at the end. The only time I lifted my hands was to defend myself from being hit, and if there was no CCTV, I would have got sent to prison. I was told a couple of months ago they were planning to drag my name through the mud so they can try their best as you can now see what the media machine is trying to do. The point of this story is don’t always believe what you read or see on the news. #mcloving

Obviously, the media want to recycle and print the same lies as a few years back, and people are believing it. All charges were dropped in this incident as I was the one who was attacked by 2 drunk women and tried to get away on three separate occasions. Over ten years ago, even though the police saw the CCTV, I was still charged with punching, kicking, and pulling a girl’s hair, but this is the CCTV footage from when I was attacked, and thankfully, when the judge watched it, all the charges were dropped as they were the aggressor, as I was the one trying to get away from the situation on three separate occasions, and I even had to run away at the end. The only time I lifted my hands was to defend myself from being hit, and if there was no CCTV, I would have got sent to prison. I was told a couple of months ago they were planning to drag my name through the mud so they can try their best as you can now see what the media machine is trying to do. The point of this story is don’t always believe what you read or see on the news. #mcloving

James English

123,382 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Mr. President, Please Seek the Truth on the Ground About SHA H.E. the President, Kenyans need to tell you the truth about what is happening on the ground with the Social Health Authority (SHA). SHA was launched with good intentions, and many Kenyans welcomed the transition from NHIF to a system intended to provide accessible healthcare to all. However, there are growing concerns that implementation challenges, administrative failures and possible malpractice in some facilities may be undermining the programme and creating the impression that SHA is not working. There are reports and concerns from patients that when a patient is referred from a Level 4 facility to a Level 5 or Level 6 hospital because of the seriousness of their condition, they may be asked to pay cash before admission, despite being under SHA. This is especially concerning because ordinary Kenyans were led to believe that they would be able to access covered healthcare without being required to make such payments. Another major problem occurs when the SHA system is unavailable or experiencing technical or administrative difficulties. Patients can find themselves unable to receive treatment unless they pay cash. A system failure should not become a reason for a sick person to be denied urgent medical care. There are also concerns that some hospitals may submit claims to SHA while simultaneously asking patients to make additional payments for services they believe should be covered. These allegations need to be independently investigated rather than dismissed. There are further concerns that individuals who previously benefited from fraudulent or questionable NHIF claims may have interests within the new system, and that some people within SHA or hospital management could be contributing to its problems. These are serious allegations and should not be treated as facts without evidence. However, they are important enough to warrant an independent investigation. Mr. President, please do not rely only on reports from officials within the system. Commission an independent, transparent assessment of SHA implementation across the country, particularly in public hospitals and among ordinary citizens who depend on public healthcare. The investigation should establish: 1.Whether hospitals are demanding cash payments for services covered by SHA. 2.Whether hospitals are submitting SHA claims while also charging patients for the same services. often system failures prevent patients from accessing treatment. 4.Whether public hospitals are receiving SHA reimbursements on time and whether those payments are reaching the intended services. 5.Whether there is fraud, abuse or conflict of interest within the SHA claims and payment system. 6.Why patients referred to higher-level hospitals are sometimes facing difficulties accessing care. 7.Whether the experience of ordinary Kenyans differs significantly from that of civil servants or other groups with easier access to healthcare services. The President should hear directly from patients, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators and independent healthcare experts not only from officials responsible for implementing SHA. If SHA is being sabotaged or poorly implemented, those responsible should be identified and held accountable. If the problems are caused by weaknesses in the system, those weaknesses should be corrected. Kenyans do not want SHA to fail. They want it to work. Mr. President, please obtain an independent report on what is actually happening in hospitals across the country and correct the mistakes before public confidence in SHA is lost. The success of universal healthcare should not be determined by reports on paper; it should be measured by whether an ordinary Kenyan can walk into a hospital when sick and receive the care they need without being forced to pay cash because of failures within the system.

Mr. President, Please Seek the Truth on the Ground About SHA H.E. the President, Kenyans need to tell you the truth about what is happening on the ground with the Social Health Authority (SHA). SHA was launched with good intentions, and many Kenyans welcomed the transition from NHIF to a system intended to provide accessible healthcare to all. However, there are growing concerns that implementation challenges, administrative failures and possible malpractice in some facilities may be undermining the programme and creating the impression that SHA is not working. There are reports and concerns from patients that when a patient is referred from a Level 4 facility to a Level 5 or Level 6 hospital because of the seriousness of their condition, they may be asked to pay cash before admission, despite being under SHA. This is especially concerning because ordinary Kenyans were led to believe that they would be able to access covered healthcare without being required to make such payments. Another major problem occurs when the SHA system is unavailable or experiencing technical or administrative difficulties. Patients can find themselves unable to receive treatment unless they pay cash. A system failure should not become a reason for a sick person to be denied urgent medical care. There are also concerns that some hospitals may submit claims to SHA while simultaneously asking patients to make additional payments for services they believe should be covered. These allegations need to be independently investigated rather than dismissed. There are further concerns that individuals who previously benefited from fraudulent or questionable NHIF claims may have interests within the new system, and that some people within SHA or hospital management could be contributing to its problems. These are serious allegations and should not be treated as facts without evidence. However, they are important enough to warrant an independent investigation. Mr. President, please do not rely only on reports from officials within the system. Commission an independent, transparent assessment of SHA implementation across the country, particularly in public hospitals and among ordinary citizens who depend on public healthcare. The investigation should establish: 1.Whether hospitals are demanding cash payments for services covered by SHA. 2.Whether hospitals are submitting SHA claims while also charging patients for the same services. often system failures prevent patients from accessing treatment. 4.Whether public hospitals are receiving SHA reimbursements on time and whether those payments are reaching the intended services. 5.Whether there is fraud, abuse or conflict of interest within the SHA claims and payment system. 6.Why patients referred to higher-level hospitals are sometimes facing difficulties accessing care. 7.Whether the experience of ordinary Kenyans differs significantly from that of civil servants or other groups with easier access to healthcare services. The President should hear directly from patients, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators and independent healthcare experts not only from officials responsible for implementing SHA. If SHA is being sabotaged or poorly implemented, those responsible should be identified and held accountable. If the problems are caused by weaknesses in the system, those weaknesses should be corrected. Kenyans do not want SHA to fail. They want it to work. Mr. President, please obtain an independent report on what is actually happening in hospitals across the country and correct the mistakes before public confidence in SHA is lost. The success of universal healthcare should not be determined by reports on paper; it should be measured by whether an ordinary Kenyan can walk into a hospital when sick and receive the care they need without being forced to pay cash because of failures within the system.

Geoffrey Mosiria

168,055 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Victor Davis Hanson just dropped the single most definitive explanation for the chaos in Belfast and cities across the West. In two minutes flat, he exposed how DEI, open borders and failure to assimilate have created a powder keg that’s now exploding. HANSON: “It’s a reminder that DEI or racial chauvinism, ethnic chauvinism combined with open borders and mass immigration from illiberal societies is a recipe for disaster.” “And nobody condones the counter-riots but when you bring in people from antithetical cultures and you tell them upon arrival they don’t have to acculturate, integrate or assimilate but they have grudges against their hosts because they feel that they are victimized and you lavish social entitlements upon them and you make them exempt from any consequences of their illiberal behavior, then you get what we’ve seen there.” “We’ve got to remember, both in the United States and in Europe, especially the U.K., we’re 60 years, three generations from the civil rights acts and their versions of them.” “So we’ve got three generations of people in their 40s 50s and 60s that grew up with reverse discrimination and they didn’t know anything about segregation or institutionalized racism.” “All they know is that their job opportunities were curtailed because there was this new idea of equality of result.” “Where people based on their skin color or ethnic origins or whether they were migrants or something, they had preferential treatment and yet they were paying for the sins of prior generations.” “That’s what they felt.” “And then finally there was a class element to it.” “The elites crafted this system to bring in constituents dependent on state largesse but they were never subject to the consequences of our own terrible ideology because they had the money and the zip codes and the resources to protect themselves from that kind of violence that we saw.” “They made it worse by insulting the White working class as if they are illiberal and neanderthal, when they created the conditions and they were immune from them and now they don’t know what to do because they realize it’s blowing up in their face.” “Both there and in the United States.”

Victor Davis Hanson just dropped the single most definitive explanation for the chaos in Belfast and cities across the West. In two minutes flat, he exposed how DEI, open borders and failure to assimilate have created a powder keg that’s now exploding. HANSON: “It’s a reminder that DEI or racial chauvinism, ethnic chauvinism combined with open borders and mass immigration from illiberal societies is a recipe for disaster.” “And nobody condones the counter-riots but when you bring in people from antithetical cultures and you tell them upon arrival they don’t have to acculturate, integrate or assimilate but they have grudges against their hosts because they feel that they are victimized and you lavish social entitlements upon them and you make them exempt from any consequences of their illiberal behavior, then you get what we’ve seen there.” “We’ve got to remember, both in the United States and in Europe, especially the U.K., we’re 60 years, three generations from the civil rights acts and their versions of them.” “So we’ve got three generations of people in their 40s 50s and 60s that grew up with reverse discrimination and they didn’t know anything about segregation or institutionalized racism.” “All they know is that their job opportunities were curtailed because there was this new idea of equality of result.” “Where people based on their skin color or ethnic origins or whether they were migrants or something, they had preferential treatment and yet they were paying for the sins of prior generations.” “That’s what they felt.” “And then finally there was a class element to it.” “The elites crafted this system to bring in constituents dependent on state largesse but they were never subject to the consequences of our own terrible ideology because they had the money and the zip codes and the resources to protect themselves from that kind of violence that we saw.” “They made it worse by insulting the White working class as if they are illiberal and neanderthal, when they created the conditions and they were immune from them and now they don’t know what to do because they realize it’s blowing up in their face.” “Both there and in the United States.”

Overton

150,585 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Oncologist Dr. William Makis describes getting attacked by the president of City of Hope cancer centers for publishing success stories using antiparasitics to treat turbo cancers: "These antiparasitics are being heavily attacked and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, [and] fenbendazole. And I have hundreds of success stories...." This clip of Dr. Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from a panel discussion posted to the World Council for Health Rumble channel on November 24, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So these antiparasitics are being heavily attacked, and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, fenbendazole, and I have hundreds of success stories. I get attacked. I get attacked by mainstream doctors and mainstream oncologists. "And just going back to what Kevin McKernan said about this phenomenon of trying to retract papers, get good papers retracted, I've had this happen to me very recently. We published recently a paper on fenbendazole. Three cases of stage four cancer patients who had failed three or four or five lines of chemotherapy, and mainstream oncology regimens. These cancer patients were dying. They took fenbendazole and they became cancer free. And we followed them up, up to three years. They stayed cancer three for up to three years. So we had three cases. We published this paper a few months ago. This was only the second paper published on the antiparasitic fenbendazole in the past five years with human cases. The first one was published by Stanford University in 2021. And so they had published three cases in 2021. We published three cases in 2025. Within a month or two of the publication of our paper. Now it passed peer review and it was published. We were attacked by the editor of the paper, who's actually the president of the City of Hope cancer centers in the United States, in Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. "This was Dr. Maurice [Maurie] Markman, President of City of Hope, so a big time oncologist, with a lot of, you know, big pharma funding behind him. He said he's going to pull the paper. And they didn't have a good reason to pull the paper. In fact, the reason that they were putting was that I was giving, you know, medical advice to other cancer patients with fenbendazole. And so that was some kind of a conflict of interest. And because, you know, that wasn't declared in the way they liked, that they were going to pull the paper. "And so, you know, this is an attack. We're going to see these attacks not just on Kevin McKernan and David Speicher's work in trying to make the link between Covid vaccines and these turbo cancers. But even those of us who are going to try to treat these patients, and help these patients and try to get that work published with antiparasitics and these turbo cancers, we're being attacked, and our papers are being attacked for retraction as well." #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure

Oncologist Dr. William Makis describes getting attacked by the president of City of Hope cancer centers for publishing success stories using antiparasitics to treat turbo cancers: "These antiparasitics are being heavily attacked and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, [and] fenbendazole. And I have hundreds of success stories...." This clip of Dr. Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from a panel discussion posted to the World Council for Health Rumble channel on November 24, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So these antiparasitics are being heavily attacked, and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, fenbendazole, and I have hundreds of success stories. I get attacked. I get attacked by mainstream doctors and mainstream oncologists. "And just going back to what Kevin McKernan said about this phenomenon of trying to retract papers, get good papers retracted, I've had this happen to me very recently. We published recently a paper on fenbendazole. Three cases of stage four cancer patients who had failed three or four or five lines of chemotherapy, and mainstream oncology regimens. These cancer patients were dying. They took fenbendazole and they became cancer free. And we followed them up, up to three years. They stayed cancer three for up to three years. So we had three cases. We published this paper a few months ago. This was only the second paper published on the antiparasitic fenbendazole in the past five years with human cases. The first one was published by Stanford University in 2021. And so they had published three cases in 2021. We published three cases in 2025. Within a month or two of the publication of our paper. Now it passed peer review and it was published. We were attacked by the editor of the paper, who's actually the president of the City of Hope cancer centers in the United States, in Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. "This was Dr. Maurice [Maurie] Markman, President of City of Hope, so a big time oncologist, with a lot of, you know, big pharma funding behind him. He said he's going to pull the paper. And they didn't have a good reason to pull the paper. In fact, the reason that they were putting was that I was giving, you know, medical advice to other cancer patients with fenbendazole. And so that was some kind of a conflict of interest. And because, you know, that wasn't declared in the way they liked, that they were going to pull the paper. "And so, you know, this is an attack. We're going to see these attacks not just on Kevin McKernan and David Speicher's work in trying to make the link between Covid vaccines and these turbo cancers. But even those of us who are going to try to treat these patients, and help these patients and try to get that work published with antiparasitics and these turbo cancers, we're being attacked, and our papers are being attacked for retraction as well." #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure

Joe Tippens

32,159 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Pediatrician Investigated for Sexual Misconduct in Ontario Now Practicing in Saskatchewan I confronted Dr. Adegbenga Oluwaseun Rabiu at his medical office in Moose Jaw, where he is treating children of unsuspecting rural communities, about his track record in Ontario of being banned for life from practicing there following sexual abuse investigations. I asked why anyone should trust their children to his care. Dr. Rabiu, a foreign-medical graduate from Nigeria, is currently charged with two counts of dishonest conduct by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan (CPSS) for allegedly hiding the fact that he was under a sexual abuse investigation in Ontario when he applied to renew his license in Saskatchewan. Despite his concerning history of two separate sexual abuse investigations in Ontario, the CPSS continues to allow Dr. Rabiu unrestricted access to the most vulnerable members of our society: children. The Registrar’s office of the CPSS filed an application on February 14, 2024, asking the CPSS Council to strike Dr. Rabiu’s name from the register. The Registrar argued that had they been aware “of the entirety of Dr. Rabiu’s conduct at the time he applied for registration, it would have denied him licensure.” But the CPSS Council denied the Registrar’s application to strike Dr. Rabiu’s name from the register, according to an exclusive document obtained by Media Bezirgan’s research team. That exclusive document lays out exactly what happened and raises serious questions regarding the fitness of Canadian medical boards’ competence and dedication to protecting the public from doctors like Rabiu. Learn more 👇🧵

Pediatrician Investigated for Sexual Misconduct in Ontario Now Practicing in Saskatchewan I confronted Dr. Adegbenga Oluwaseun Rabiu at his medical office in Moose Jaw, where he is treating children of unsuspecting rural communities, about his track record in Ontario of being banned for life from practicing there following sexual abuse investigations. I asked why anyone should trust their children to his care. Dr. Rabiu, a foreign-medical graduate from Nigeria, is currently charged with two counts of dishonest conduct by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan (CPSS) for allegedly hiding the fact that he was under a sexual abuse investigation in Ontario when he applied to renew his license in Saskatchewan. Despite his concerning history of two separate sexual abuse investigations in Ontario, the CPSS continues to allow Dr. Rabiu unrestricted access to the most vulnerable members of our society: children. The Registrar’s office of the CPSS filed an application on February 14, 2024, asking the CPSS Council to strike Dr. Rabiu’s name from the register. The Registrar argued that had they been aware “of the entirety of Dr. Rabiu’s conduct at the time he applied for registration, it would have denied him licensure.” But the CPSS Council denied the Registrar’s application to strike Dr. Rabiu’s name from the register, according to an exclusive document obtained by Media Bezirgan’s research team. That exclusive document lays out exactly what happened and raises serious questions regarding the fitness of Canadian medical boards’ competence and dedication to protecting the public from doctors like Rabiu. Learn more 👇🧵

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

19,957 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Examining the Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Ciara Kelly and Janssen Pharmaceuticals In recent discussions about medical ethics and transparency, the name of Dr. Ciara Kelly has emerged, particularly concerning her connections with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. The issue of conflicts of interest in the medical field has garnered significant attention, as it poses critical questions about the integrity of healthcare professionals and the implications for patient trust. Dr. Ciara Kelly is a notable figure in the medical community, known for her contributions to health advocacy and her role as a commentator on health issues. As a respected physician, she has used her platform to inform the public on various health matters, ranging from chronic diseases to public health policies. However, recent revelations about her financial ties with Janssen have prompted scrutiny, raising alarms about potential biases in her commentary and recommendations. Understanding Conflicts of Interest A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s professional actions may be influenced by personal financial interests. In the medical field, this can raise ethical concerns, especially when it comes to prescribing medications, endorsing treatments, or providing public health guidance. Transparency is essential; physicians must disclose any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies to maintain the trust of their patients and the public. The Connection to Janssen Reports suggest that Dr. Kelly has received funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals for various projects, possibly including research and speaking engagements. This financial relationship could both enhance her work and present challenges regarding impartiality. Critics argue that such ties can lead to a preference for certain medications or therapies, undermining the objective nature of medical advice. The Implications for Healthcare Conflicts of interest like those associated with Dr. Kelly and Janssen raise important questions about the integrity of healthcare communications. Patients rely on healthcare professionals to provide unbiased and evidence-based recommendations, particularly when it comes to complex decisions about treatment options. If a physician's commentary is influenced by financial relationships, it may compromise the quality of care and patient autonomy. The Importance of Transparency Transparency is key in navigating potential conflicts of interest. Disclosures should be clear, accessible, and comprehensive, enabling patients and the public to understand the potential influences on a physician's recommendations. Health institutions, professional organisations, and regulatory bodies must enforce stringent guidelines to ensure that all healthcare providers disclose any financial ties to pharmaceutical companies or other entities that could influence their clinical judgment. Moving Forward with Integrity As Dr. Ciara Kelly's situation evolves, it serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding ethical standards in the medical field. Healthcare professionals must navigate their relationships with pharmaceutical companies carefully, prioritising patient welfare and maintaining trust. The emergence of conflicts of interest in medicine calls for continued dialogue and rigorous scrutiny, emphasising that the ultimate goal should always be to provide the best possible care for patients, free from undue influence. In an era where information is readily available, patients deserve the assurance that the advice they receive is grounded in sound ethics and a commitment to their health, unmarred by conflicting interests. The medical community must remain vigilant, encouraging transparency and accountability to foster trust and ensure that healthcare remains a noble profession focused entirely on patient care.

Examining the Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Ciara Kelly and Janssen Pharmaceuticals In recent discussions about medical ethics and transparency, the name of Dr. Ciara Kelly has emerged, particularly concerning her connections with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. The issue of conflicts of interest in the medical field has garnered significant attention, as it poses critical questions about the integrity of healthcare professionals and the implications for patient trust. Dr. Ciara Kelly is a notable figure in the medical community, known for her contributions to health advocacy and her role as a commentator on health issues. As a respected physician, she has used her platform to inform the public on various health matters, ranging from chronic diseases to public health policies. However, recent revelations about her financial ties with Janssen have prompted scrutiny, raising alarms about potential biases in her commentary and recommendations. Understanding Conflicts of Interest A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s professional actions may be influenced by personal financial interests. In the medical field, this can raise ethical concerns, especially when it comes to prescribing medications, endorsing treatments, or providing public health guidance. Transparency is essential; physicians must disclose any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies to maintain the trust of their patients and the public. The Connection to Janssen Reports suggest that Dr. Kelly has received funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals for various projects, possibly including research and speaking engagements. This financial relationship could both enhance her work and present challenges regarding impartiality. Critics argue that such ties can lead to a preference for certain medications or therapies, undermining the objective nature of medical advice. The Implications for Healthcare Conflicts of interest like those associated with Dr. Kelly and Janssen raise important questions about the integrity of healthcare communications. Patients rely on healthcare professionals to provide unbiased and evidence-based recommendations, particularly when it comes to complex decisions about treatment options. If a physician's commentary is influenced by financial relationships, it may compromise the quality of care and patient autonomy. The Importance of Transparency Transparency is key in navigating potential conflicts of interest. Disclosures should be clear, accessible, and comprehensive, enabling patients and the public to understand the potential influences on a physician's recommendations. Health institutions, professional organisations, and regulatory bodies must enforce stringent guidelines to ensure that all healthcare providers disclose any financial ties to pharmaceutical companies or other entities that could influence their clinical judgment. Moving Forward with Integrity As Dr. Ciara Kelly's situation evolves, it serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding ethical standards in the medical field. Healthcare professionals must navigate their relationships with pharmaceutical companies carefully, prioritising patient welfare and maintaining trust. The emergence of conflicts of interest in medicine calls for continued dialogue and rigorous scrutiny, emphasising that the ultimate goal should always be to provide the best possible care for patients, free from undue influence. In an era where information is readily available, patients deserve the assurance that the advice they receive is grounded in sound ethics and a commitment to their health, unmarred by conflicting interests. The medical community must remain vigilant, encouraging transparency and accountability to foster trust and ensure that healthcare remains a noble profession focused entirely on patient care.

Eleanor Mcgee

28,715 просмотров • 1 год назад

Today has seen an important victory in the fight for freedom and human rights in Australia. The Queensland Supreme Court today determined that COVID-19 vaccine mandates imposed on police and health workers were unlawful. The Queensland Police Service and Queensland Health were wrong to force mandates on their organisations. I said from the start these mandates were wrong. I said from the start they contravened Section 51 part 23-A of the Constitution, which prohibits civil conscription through the provision of medical services. One Nation was the only party saying it. I said from the start the mandates should be unlawful. I introduced legislation in this Parliament that would have made certain they were unlawful. With a couple of notable exceptions, the government refused to support to my bill. You didn’t care that people were being coerced into vaccination at risk of their jobs. You didn’t care the indivudual freedoms and rights you were supposed to defend and protect were under attack. You relished the power state government were taking from their citizens. You cheered them on. You were wrong. One Nation was right. One Nation was right because we were standing up for the individual freedoms and constitutional authority that underpin Australian democracy. You didn’t, and you attacked us for it. You were wrong. This decision by the Queensland Supreme Court makes it paramount we have a Royal Commission into the COVID-19 pandemic. The Prime Minister’s toothless inquiry must be abandoned. Only a Royal Commission can compel the secret advice that led to these unlawful vaccine mandates in Queensland.

Today has seen an important victory in the fight for freedom and human rights in Australia. The Queensland Supreme Court today determined that COVID-19 vaccine mandates imposed on police and health workers were unlawful. The Queensland Police Service and Queensland Health were wrong to force mandates on their organisations. I said from the start these mandates were wrong. I said from the start they contravened Section 51 part 23-A of the Constitution, which prohibits civil conscription through the provision of medical services. One Nation was the only party saying it. I said from the start the mandates should be unlawful. I introduced legislation in this Parliament that would have made certain they were unlawful. With a couple of notable exceptions, the government refused to support to my bill. You didn’t care that people were being coerced into vaccination at risk of their jobs. You didn’t care the indivudual freedoms and rights you were supposed to defend and protect were under attack. You relished the power state government were taking from their citizens. You cheered them on. You were wrong. One Nation was right. One Nation was right because we were standing up for the individual freedoms and constitutional authority that underpin Australian democracy. You didn’t, and you attacked us for it. You were wrong. This decision by the Queensland Supreme Court makes it paramount we have a Royal Commission into the COVID-19 pandemic. The Prime Minister’s toothless inquiry must be abandoned. Only a Royal Commission can compel the secret advice that led to these unlawful vaccine mandates in Queensland.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

109,167 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Todd Martin, president of Trinity Western University, denounces the activities of his son Geoffry Martin, known online as “Captive Dreamer”: Today I want to make something crystal clear…I reject white supremacy and any ideology that elevates one group of people over another. I denounce the use of derogatory and disparaging labels and language and any attempts to dehumanize another individual or group. I strongly oppose the use of social media as a means of spreading such harmful ideas. I feel for the father. What an amazing demonstration of how fake and pathetic online racism is. These people believe in “racial identity.” They think they have something in common with strangers on account of their race. Yet their worldview sickens their own parents. This is why they hide. They are outcasts in their own communities. No immigrant is more alienated from society than they are. Dr Martin seems like a decent man. None of us are responsible for the actions of our family members. He has behaved the same way anyone with a conscience would in this situation, and I sympathize with him. His son doesn’t seem reachable at this point, but hopefully he rethinks his life, and his story can serve as a warning to others.

Todd Martin, president of Trinity Western University, denounces the activities of his son Geoffry Martin, known online as “Captive Dreamer”: Today I want to make something crystal clear…I reject white supremacy and any ideology that elevates one group of people over another. I denounce the use of derogatory and disparaging labels and language and any attempts to dehumanize another individual or group. I strongly oppose the use of social media as a means of spreading such harmful ideas. I feel for the father. What an amazing demonstration of how fake and pathetic online racism is. These people believe in “racial identity.” They think they have something in common with strangers on account of their race. Yet their worldview sickens their own parents. This is why they hide. They are outcasts in their own communities. No immigrant is more alienated from society than they are. Dr Martin seems like a decent man. None of us are responsible for the actions of our family members. He has behaved the same way anyone with a conscience would in this situation, and I sympathize with him. His son doesn’t seem reachable at this point, but hopefully he rethinks his life, and his story can serve as a warning to others.

Richard Hanania

3,135,781 просмотров • 1 год назад

This morning at 7AM, 10 police officers stormed my house to search the property and arrest me for a speech and X posts - again. This is the second arrest in less than 2 months. The order was from the London Met Police - they travelled to a different city to arrest me - again. I was questioned on X posts mentioning: - jewish supremacy & jewish supremacists - 'israel' - 'israelis' and 'israeli' jews - and their feelings. - Melanie Phillips, the Chief Rabbi: Eprahim Mirvis, Wes Streeting, the General Medical Council (GMC), Emily Schrader - and their feelings regarding my posts responding to them. - Armed resistance (Palestinian) and Oct 7. - The Thawabet (principles of Palestinian liberation) - The Palestinian Naional Charter (1968) - The repatriation of jewish settlers from Palestine One of the posts was my response to Emily Schrader saying 'FAFO' with a picture of the martyred Palestinian journalist Saleh Al-Jafarawi. I began crying when I saw his picture and the interview had to be stopped for 10 minutes. I was held for over 7 hours and released on bail conditions (pre-charge): - Not to publish, post, or communicate material or statements that incite hatred, discrimination, or harassment against any individual or group based on race, religion or ethnicity. I told the officer that I do not agree that I have done any of the above and therefore do not know what I am signing for. I was told: ' Posts on jewish supremacism'. I do not believe any of the above has much to do with Britain but the majority of the interview was centred on 'israel' and 'israelis' including their feelings, their entity, and their future. Just to reiterate: I am a British citizen. I am an NHS doctor with 0 patient complaints or clinical errors who has just been suspended for 15 months after a 2 year campaign by the pro-'israel' lobby. I am part-Palestinian. I have just witnessed the mass murder of my people by the 'jewish state'/'israel' and the IOF - using my tax pounds. I have never incited violence or harm. I have criticised a foreign entity, individuals who identify with and/or support this foreign entity and the genocide it is committing, and the system of oppression underpinning the 100+ years of dispossession, murder, violence, war crimes and crimes against humanity that the Palestinians are enduring. Our freedom of speech and expression, our freedom of assembly and our civil liberties in Britain are under attack. Free Palestine. Free Britain.

This morning at 7AM, 10 police officers stormed my house to search the property and arrest me for a speech and X posts - again. This is the second arrest in less than 2 months. The order was from the London Met Police - they travelled to a different city to arrest me - again. I was questioned on X posts mentioning: - jewish supremacy & jewish supremacists - 'israel' - 'israelis' and 'israeli' jews - and their feelings. - Melanie Phillips, the Chief Rabbi: Eprahim Mirvis, Wes Streeting, the General Medical Council (GMC), Emily Schrader - and their feelings regarding my posts responding to them. - Armed resistance (Palestinian) and Oct 7. - The Thawabet (principles of Palestinian liberation) - The Palestinian Naional Charter (1968) - The repatriation of jewish settlers from Palestine One of the posts was my response to Emily Schrader saying 'FAFO' with a picture of the martyred Palestinian journalist Saleh Al-Jafarawi. I began crying when I saw his picture and the interview had to be stopped for 10 minutes. I was held for over 7 hours and released on bail conditions (pre-charge): - Not to publish, post, or communicate material or statements that incite hatred, discrimination, or harassment against any individual or group based on race, religion or ethnicity. I told the officer that I do not agree that I have done any of the above and therefore do not know what I am signing for. I was told: ' Posts on jewish supremacism'. I do not believe any of the above has much to do with Britain but the majority of the interview was centred on 'israel' and 'israelis' including their feelings, their entity, and their future. Just to reiterate: I am a British citizen. I am an NHS doctor with 0 patient complaints or clinical errors who has just been suspended for 15 months after a 2 year campaign by the pro-'israel' lobby. I am part-Palestinian. I have just witnessed the mass murder of my people by the 'jewish state'/'israel' and the IOF - using my tax pounds. I have never incited violence or harm. I have criticised a foreign entity, individuals who identify with and/or support this foreign entity and the genocide it is committing, and the system of oppression underpinning the 100+ years of dispossession, murder, violence, war crimes and crimes against humanity that the Palestinians are enduring. Our freedom of speech and expression, our freedom of assembly and our civil liberties in Britain are under attack. Free Palestine. Free Britain.

Dr Rahmeh Aladwan

347,800 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I’m m thinking to myself as a parent at what point do I take their E-bikes away? Hmm, would it be when they are riding in the streets while terrorizing other cars, or maybe when they intentionally do wheelies and try to chase cars and almost cause a wreck? Worst of all, when the police show up they all run away, and then post the evidence online like it’s a kind of flex. I’m glad they did, most of the parents are oblivious to what their kids are doing on these bikes and when they get busted they always defend their kids like they are good parents who knows what their kids are doing. These kids were riding in a group when they were training another car and almost cause a wreck. They scatter like roaches when the light turns on when the cops come. At first I wasn’t bothered by them as much but now I find them down right irritating. Am I being harsh when I say anytime these kids are caught on the road with these, the bike should be impounded with a huge fine for release? Would that be fair it an u just being too reasonable? The neighbor’s kid has one of these and him and his friends are always doing wheelies in the road , there have been some close calls, thankfully I didn’t hit them but I came pretty close a few times. I would be vilified by the parents if they cause an accident involving my car even though they aren’t even supposed to be on the road. Am I right with my concerns or am I turning into a Karen? I was going to buy one for my kid but not anymore.

I’m m thinking to myself as a parent at what point do I take their E-bikes away? Hmm, would it be when they are riding in the streets while terrorizing other cars, or maybe when they intentionally do wheelies and try to chase cars and almost cause a wreck? Worst of all, when the police show up they all run away, and then post the evidence online like it’s a kind of flex. I’m glad they did, most of the parents are oblivious to what their kids are doing on these bikes and when they get busted they always defend their kids like they are good parents who knows what their kids are doing. These kids were riding in a group when they were training another car and almost cause a wreck. They scatter like roaches when the light turns on when the cops come. At first I wasn’t bothered by them as much but now I find them down right irritating. Am I being harsh when I say anytime these kids are caught on the road with these, the bike should be impounded with a huge fine for release? Would that be fair it an u just being too reasonable? The neighbor’s kid has one of these and him and his friends are always doing wheelies in the road , there have been some close calls, thankfully I didn’t hit them but I came pretty close a few times. I would be vilified by the parents if they cause an accident involving my car even though they aren’t even supposed to be on the road. Am I right with my concerns or am I turning into a Karen? I was going to buy one for my kid but not anymore.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

148,885 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад