Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I still remember the first time I saw a 3D printer at work. It felt like magic — objects appearing layer by layer, as if from thin air. But also limited. Flat, rigid, constrained. Now? The game has changed. 🤖 6-axis robotics × 500°C extrusion × multi-angle precision. No...

pascal_bornet's profile picture

Pascal Bornet

123,554 subscribers

456,045 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiOyunSanat
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

People who've never set foot in a factory will never understand... I watched this three times. For decades, robotics simulation has promised faster deployment. But factories still had to build the real cell to see if it actually worked. Which meant expensive physical prototypes, weeks or months!!! of commissioning, constant surprises between simulation and reality That “sim-to-real gap” has quietly been one of the biggest bottlenecks in manufacturing automation. And it’s exactly what is changing. Today, ABB Robotics announced a partnership with NVIDIA Robotics aimed at closing this gap through the new RobotStudio HyperReality platform: Simulation and real robot behavior can match with near-perfect accuracy. That means manufacturers can design, test, and validate entire production lines before a single robot is installed on the factory floor. The implications are massive: • up to 80% faster setup and commissioning • roughly 40% lower costs by removing physical prototypes • about 50% faster time-to-market for new production lines In other words: Factories can move from trial-and-error engineering to software-driven manufacturing design. Production lines become something you build and validate digitally first. Then deploy physically once everything already works. For an industry that still measures deployment timelines in months or years, this is a major shift. It changes how automation projects are planned, how factories are designed, and how fast manufacturing can adapt to new products. Physical AI actually becomes deployable at an industrial scale. I’ll be at GTC in San Jose next week to see and talk to manufacturers and robotics engineers. If you are into manufacturing like I am, hit me up; my DMs are open!
0:31

People who've never set foot in a factory will never understand... I watched this three times. For decades, robotics simulation has promised faster deployment. But factories still had to build the real cell to see if it actually worked. Which meant expensive physical prototypes, weeks or months!!! of commissioning, constant surprises between simulation and reality That “sim-to-real gap” has quietly been one of the biggest bottlenecks in manufacturing automation. And it’s exactly what is changing. Today, ABB Robotics announced a partnership with NVIDIA Robotics aimed at closing this gap through the new RobotStudio HyperReality platform: Simulation and real robot behavior can match with near-perfect accuracy. That means manufacturers can design, test, and validate entire production lines before a single robot is installed on the factory floor. The implications are massive: • up to 80% faster setup and commissioning • roughly 40% lower costs by removing physical prototypes • about 50% faster time-to-market for new production lines In other words: Factories can move from trial-and-error engineering to software-driven manufacturing design. Production lines become something you build and validate digitally first. Then deploy physically once everything already works. For an industry that still measures deployment timelines in months or years, this is a major shift. It changes how automation projects are planned, how factories are designed, and how fast manufacturing can adapt to new products. Physical AI actually becomes deployable at an industrial scale. I’ll be at GTC in San Jose next week to see and talk to manufacturers and robotics engineers. If you are into manufacturing like I am, hit me up; my DMs are open!

Ilir Aliu

68,927 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Like an appreciation of progress, reading and literacy are among the things that are good but cognitively unnatural. That is, they go against our evolved nature. We didn’t evolve with print; it was a recent invention. Reading, for many of us, has become so second nature that we just assume it’s the most natural way of getting information. But what we’ve seen, especially in the last 10 years, when video has become so cheap because of the cloud computing revolution and the broadband revolution, is that a lot of people, unlike us, much prefer to listen and watch than to read. You just see this: when I go to Google and ask a basic question about how to unstick my printer or solve a problem, I get like five videos. And I just want a paragraph that would solve it. I don’t want to see Seth saying, “Hi, welcome to my show. If you like it, subscribe and give it a like.” So just help me solve the problem. But clearly there’s something unusual about me, because people are going for the video. And the massive availability of video—of TikTok, of YouTube—means that people may not be getting the practice or putting in the effort into literacy, which we have reason to believe was one of the drivers of the Flynn effect and of cognitive sophistication in general. Human Progress
1:30

Like an appreciation of progress, reading and literacy are among the things that are good but cognitively unnatural. That is, they go against our evolved nature. We didn’t evolve with print; it was a recent invention. Reading, for many of us, has become so second nature that we just assume it’s the most natural way of getting information. But what we’ve seen, especially in the last 10 years, when video has become so cheap because of the cloud computing revolution and the broadband revolution, is that a lot of people, unlike us, much prefer to listen and watch than to read. You just see this: when I go to Google and ask a basic question about how to unstick my printer or solve a problem, I get like five videos. And I just want a paragraph that would solve it. I don’t want to see Seth saying, “Hi, welcome to my show. If you like it, subscribe and give it a like.” So just help me solve the problem. But clearly there’s something unusual about me, because people are going for the video. And the massive availability of video—of TikTok, of YouTube—means that people may not be getting the practice or putting in the effort into literacy, which we have reason to believe was one of the drivers of the Flynn effect and of cognitive sophistication in general. Human Progress

Steven Pinker

546,837 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Most robotics teams can make a robot move… very few can make it work every day in the real world! @roboforce_inc was just featured in Jensen Huang’s GTC keynote, not for a demo but for a robot they claim is already working in the field. Their system, TITAN, is built for industrial environments: ✅ 40 kg dual-arm payload ✅ millimeter-level precision ✅ 8 hours runtime ✅ early pilots in energy, logistics, and manufacturing They call it Physical AI: The focus is on getting robots to do the kind of labor that still depends on people: repetitive, risky, and physical. IMO, what stands out isn’t the specs. It’s the claim of 11,000 robot orders❗️ If even a fraction of that turns into real deployments, it would make RoboForce one of the most widely scaled robot platforms in the world!!?? The open question is whether this shift from prototype to production is real or just the next phase of robotics storytelling. It looks very promising to me. It’s also interesting how their founder openly pushes back against the humanoid trend, arguing for wheels over legs in real industrial settings. It’s an unusual perspective in a time when humanoids get most of the attention. If they are right, the next humanoid robotics wave might look less like a human and more like an industrial version. Seen at —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:
0:29

Most robotics teams can make a robot move… very few can make it work every day in the real world! @roboforce_inc was just featured in Jensen Huang’s GTC keynote, not for a demo but for a robot they claim is already working in the field. Their system, TITAN, is built for industrial environments: ✅ 40 kg dual-arm payload ✅ millimeter-level precision ✅ 8 hours runtime ✅ early pilots in energy, logistics, and manufacturing They call it Physical AI: The focus is on getting robots to do the kind of labor that still depends on people: repetitive, risky, and physical. IMO, what stands out isn’t the specs. It’s the claim of 11,000 robot orders❗️ If even a fraction of that turns into real deployments, it would make RoboForce one of the most widely scaled robot platforms in the world!!?? The open question is whether this shift from prototype to production is real or just the next phase of robotics storytelling. It looks very promising to me. It’s also interesting how their founder openly pushes back against the humanoid trend, arguing for wheels over legs in real industrial settings. It’s an unusual perspective in a time when humanoids get most of the attention. If they are right, the next humanoid robotics wave might look less like a human and more like an industrial version. Seen at —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

27,741 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Can we call this AI directing? 😂 Seedance 2.0 with the Omni Reference feature honestly feels like a total game changer. Summer Trip is one of my film which I made used Omni Reference, not only start frame anymore and for the first time, it genuinely feels like I’m directing the AI instead of just prompting it. The reasoning in Seedance 2.0 is seriously impressive. It understands intent in a way that feels collaborative. Of course, in production it still needs proper touch-ups in post, grading, timing, polishing details, but the foundation it gives is strong. Like it or not, we’re already here. And to be honest, my workflow has to evolve too. I can’t approach this the same way I did before. It’s less about generating random shots and more about guiding, refining, and thinking like a director from the start. Personally, I see this as a shift, not replacing filmmaking, but reshaping the role of the filmmaker. Now the question isn’t “Can AI make it?” but “How well can you direct it?”
2:19

Can we call this AI directing? 😂 Seedance 2.0 with the Omni Reference feature honestly feels like a total game changer. Summer Trip is one of my film which I made used Omni Reference, not only start frame anymore and for the first time, it genuinely feels like I’m directing the AI instead of just prompting it. The reasoning in Seedance 2.0 is seriously impressive. It understands intent in a way that feels collaborative. Of course, in production it still needs proper touch-ups in post, grading, timing, polishing details, but the foundation it gives is strong. Like it or not, we’re already here. And to be honest, my workflow has to evolve too. I can’t approach this the same way I did before. It’s less about generating random shots and more about guiding, refining, and thinking like a director from the start. Personally, I see this as a shift, not replacing filmmaking, but reshaping the role of the filmmaker. Now the question isn’t “Can AI make it?” but “How well can you direct it?”

Dinda Prasetyo

29,385 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I built this zoom UI entirely in Cursor I still mainly use Claude for everything. Sometimes, I switch to o1, but Agent has been game-changing for me, mainly because it's able to figure out a lot of things by itself, like which files to include, what errors to fix and it scales well with the complexity of bigger projects. So 6 months solo into this project (with breaks and while creating courses), I must say that building a video editor from scratch is humbling. The hardest parts are really hard (like exporting, multi-video editing, storage) and the shiny things are mostly easy. AI does a lot of things well, but you absolutely need to be persistent, approach from multiple angles and combine with your intuition and taste. Still, without AI, this project would have been just a dream. And no matter what you want to design or code, or what tools you use, it'll only be meaningful if you put a lot of thought and execution into it.
1:30

I built this zoom UI entirely in Cursor I still mainly use Claude for everything. Sometimes, I switch to o1, but Agent has been game-changing for me, mainly because it's able to figure out a lot of things by itself, like which files to include, what errors to fix and it scales well with the complexity of bigger projects. So 6 months solo into this project (with breaks and while creating courses), I must say that building a video editor from scratch is humbling. The hardest parts are really hard (like exporting, multi-video editing, storage) and the shiny things are mostly easy. AI does a lot of things well, but you absolutely need to be persistent, approach from multiple angles and combine with your intuition and taste. Still, without AI, this project would have been just a dream. And no matter what you want to design or code, or what tools you use, it'll only be meaningful if you put a lot of thought and execution into it.

Meng To

41,337 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#Tawan_V 🌞's Space 14.9.25 (Part: weight and elbow injury) 🌞: What I would like to talk about today, I can’t remember if I’ve already talked about it or not. But the first thing I want to talk about is that Tay eats a lot. I’ve been like this since I was a kid, kind of addicted. I’m afraid of being thin, because I feel like it’s embarrassing. If I’m thin, people will comment on it: “Why are you so thin?” For me, the word fat is actually a compliment, because I grew up with the idea that being thin is bad. I’ve been like this up until now, at 34 years old. My weight has always been around 62–63 kg, and my target is usually around 65 kg. I’ve never really gone beyond that always 62, 63, or 64. But earlier this year, around March or April, my weight suddenly went up to 67 kg. After a while, it even reached 68.5, and that shocked me. I was so confused because I was still eating the same way I always had eating a lot, 3–4 meals a day, sometimes more. If 3 meals, I eat like tons. I also added (protein) shakes to gain weight. Now I’m at 68 kg, almost shooting SHTH soon while my arms and body look bigger, my belly has also grown. If I eat less for just 2–5 days, my weight quickly drops back down to 65, which is about a 3 kg loss which is pretty fast. My body mass also reduces by about 1.5, and I feel small again, though the belly also goes away. The problem is, I don’t know what to do now. I can’t really do heavy fitness training because I have an injury of my tennis elbow. If I keep using it, the injury just gets worse. My therapist told me not to overuse it, but it’s hard because in daily life I can’t completely avoid using my elbow. That makes it harder to recover. Even when I go to the gym, I don’t use that arm much, but it still gets affected because the elbow helps support the body in almost every movement. I can’t hold heavy weights because of the pain, so I’ve been trying lighter exercises. Still, I’m not sure what I should do. If the injury is already bad, it may take months or even a year to recover. So now I’m wondering: should I take a break, or just be like Off Jumpol did as it will be super easy for me to be lean like that. But if I still want to get bigger, what I should do.
4:32

#Tawan_V 🌞's Space 14.9.25 (Part: weight and elbow injury) 🌞: What I would like to talk about today, I can’t remember if I’ve already talked about it or not. But the first thing I want to talk about is that Tay eats a lot. I’ve been like this since I was a kid, kind of addicted. I’m afraid of being thin, because I feel like it’s embarrassing. If I’m thin, people will comment on it: “Why are you so thin?” For me, the word fat is actually a compliment, because I grew up with the idea that being thin is bad. I’ve been like this up until now, at 34 years old. My weight has always been around 62–63 kg, and my target is usually around 65 kg. I’ve never really gone beyond that always 62, 63, or 64. But earlier this year, around March or April, my weight suddenly went up to 67 kg. After a while, it even reached 68.5, and that shocked me. I was so confused because I was still eating the same way I always had eating a lot, 3–4 meals a day, sometimes more. If 3 meals, I eat like tons. I also added (protein) shakes to gain weight. Now I’m at 68 kg, almost shooting SHTH soon while my arms and body look bigger, my belly has also grown. If I eat less for just 2–5 days, my weight quickly drops back down to 65, which is about a 3 kg loss which is pretty fast. My body mass also reduces by about 1.5, and I feel small again, though the belly also goes away. The problem is, I don’t know what to do now. I can’t really do heavy fitness training because I have an injury of my tennis elbow. If I keep using it, the injury just gets worse. My therapist told me not to overuse it, but it’s hard because in daily life I can’t completely avoid using my elbow. That makes it harder to recover. Even when I go to the gym, I don’t use that arm much, but it still gets affected because the elbow helps support the body in almost every movement. I can’t hold heavy weights because of the pain, so I’ve been trying lighter exercises. Still, I’m not sure what I should do. If the injury is already bad, it may take months or even a year to recover. So now I’m wondering: should I take a break, or just be like Off Jumpol did as it will be super easy for me to be lean like that. But if I still want to get bigger, what I should do.

แก้ม ᴛᴛ.ᴅᴀʏʟɪɢʜᴛ ☀️

18,432 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Today I assembled the first batch of reBot DevArm in the U.S! First one on the planet! 🇺🇸⚙️ But this isn’t about a robot arm. This is about what happens when open source hits robotics. For years: •Hardware was locked •Robotics was expensive •Embodied AI was out of reach Now? Anyone can get their hands on: •6 DOF manipulation •Real precision (<0.2 mm repeatability) •Full stack access (ROS, Isaac Sim, LeRobot) This is how movements start. Not in labs. Not behind paywalls. But in the hands of builders. Massive respect to Seeed Studio for pushing true open-source robotics forward! We’re about to see: → Thousands of robot arms trained like athletes → Real-world datasets explode → Physical AI built in garages, not just research labs At SoloTech , this is the unlock we’ve been waiting for, training and deploying Physical AI skill models on real hardware, anywhere. No sims. No vaporware. No excuses. Production Grade Physical AI. Want to get access? Check out the Physical AI Gym in San Francisco or DM me.
0:20

Today I assembled the first batch of reBot DevArm in the U.S! First one on the planet! 🇺🇸⚙️ But this isn’t about a robot arm. This is about what happens when open source hits robotics. For years: •Hardware was locked •Robotics was expensive •Embodied AI was out of reach Now? Anyone can get their hands on: •6 DOF manipulation •Real precision (<0.2 mm repeatability) •Full stack access (ROS, Isaac Sim, LeRobot) This is how movements start. Not in labs. Not behind paywalls. But in the hands of builders. Massive respect to Seeed Studio for pushing true open-source robotics forward! We’re about to see: → Thousands of robot arms trained like athletes → Real-world datasets explode → Physical AI built in garages, not just research labs At SoloTech , this is the unlock we’ve been waiting for, training and deploying Physical AI skill models on real hardware, anywhere. No sims. No vaporware. No excuses. Production Grade Physical AI. Want to get access? Check out the Physical AI Gym in San Francisco or DM me.

Dhruv Diddi

31,214 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A closer look on the GSAP powered animations in Webflow. Just from my perspective. In short, it’s way more powerful than I first thought. The more I use it, the more I like it. Of course, there are some parts missing. But it's the first version. There's still a lot to come. For example, custom ease would already make a huge difference. Breakpoints. Maybe a way to add custom functions as sometimes you need to calculate stuff in JavaScript to get complex animations. The biggest part for me is that you can just build the animation inside a timeline. This makes it so much easier than writing it as code. You can fine tune it so much more. When there would be a way to export the tween as code to add some more functionality would be awesome. You can also add custom classes with the timeline, which can then be used in custom CSS to add more functionality. With a bit of custom code you can also use breakpoints for your animations. By using the custom event the animation can be used in custom code which can also be pretty powerful. Didn’t test it so much yet, but would be cool if you could just take the event and use for example the onComplete() from GSAP or other stuff. For example. let mm = gsap.matchMedia(); const module = Webflow.require("ix3"); module.ready().then(() => { mm.add( { isMobile: "(max-width: 992px)", }, (context) => { let { isMobile } = context.conditions; if (isMobile) { module.emit("Mobile Animation"); } } ); }); "Mobile Animation" is the name of your custom event. I hope that part will get more powerful. Something I miss on the timeline is that when you select more actions you can just drag all actions. It would be cool if you could move it frame by frame with the arrow keys, like in Jitter for example. Or just write a specific point like when you have one selected. For now I would further write the code myself, but I’m excited to see where it’s going. Maybe there will be a time where you could animate most parts inside Webflow 🙂 Can’t wait for the next GSAP update!
0:27

A closer look on the GSAP powered animations in Webflow. Just from my perspective. In short, it’s way more powerful than I first thought. The more I use it, the more I like it. Of course, there are some parts missing. But it's the first version. There's still a lot to come. For example, custom ease would already make a huge difference. Breakpoints. Maybe a way to add custom functions as sometimes you need to calculate stuff in JavaScript to get complex animations. The biggest part for me is that you can just build the animation inside a timeline. This makes it so much easier than writing it as code. You can fine tune it so much more. When there would be a way to export the tween as code to add some more functionality would be awesome. You can also add custom classes with the timeline, which can then be used in custom CSS to add more functionality. With a bit of custom code you can also use breakpoints for your animations. By using the custom event the animation can be used in custom code which can also be pretty powerful. Didn’t test it so much yet, but would be cool if you could just take the event and use for example the onComplete() from GSAP or other stuff. For example. let mm = gsap.matchMedia(); const module = Webflow.require("ix3"); module.ready().then(() => { mm.add( { isMobile: "(max-width: 992px)", }, (context) => { let { isMobile } = context.conditions; if (isMobile) { module.emit("Mobile Animation"); } } ); }); "Mobile Animation" is the name of your custom event. I hope that part will get more powerful. Something I miss on the timeline is that when you select more actions you can just drag all actions. It would be cool if you could move it frame by frame with the arrow keys, like in Jitter for example. Or just write a specific point like when you have one selected. For now I would further write the code myself, but I’m excited to see where it’s going. Maybe there will be a time where you could animate most parts inside Webflow 🙂 Can’t wait for the next GSAP update!

Eduard Bodak

12,590 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Today I realized something absolutely with BitRobot Network You dont need to own a robot… to actually control one I was just sitting at my laptop and somehow I was moving a real robotic arm in real time At first I thought it would feel like a video game It didnt Theres a completely different feeling when you know this is happening in the real world not just on a screen Every movement matters. Every action generates data And then it hit me… This is how AI is learning to interact with the real world Not from code alone but from people like us Platforms like BitRobot are opening this to everyone No setup No cost No experience Just curiosity and the internet Someone sitting at home can now help train the next generation of robotics. The future isnt coming its happening right now. If you could control a robot right now what would you try first? 🤖👇
0:26

Today I realized something absolutely with BitRobot Network You dont need to own a robot… to actually control one I was just sitting at my laptop and somehow I was moving a real robotic arm in real time At first I thought it would feel like a video game It didnt Theres a completely different feeling when you know this is happening in the real world not just on a screen Every movement matters. Every action generates data And then it hit me… This is how AI is learning to interact with the real world Not from code alone but from people like us Platforms like BitRobot are opening this to everyone No setup No cost No experience Just curiosity and the internet Someone sitting at home can now help train the next generation of robotics. The future isnt coming its happening right now. If you could control a robot right now what would you try first? 🤖👇

RAJU

40,141 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A Few Thoughts on Robotics The criticism that robotics can only be used in a rather one-sided way is, at the same time, the solution to the problem. What do I mean by that? Since the Industrial Revolution, humanity has increasingly made production methods more efficient. Fordism introduced assembly line work, but this comes at the expense of monotonous, repetitive tasks. On the one hand, immense wealth has been created; on the other hand, countless people suffer from repetitive tasks, which are a direct consequence of that industrial revolution and the division of labor- in other words, assembly line work. The debate about whether AI and robotics could impact the labor market is answered in different ways. I have a clear opinion on this: Up to now, technology has merely been an augmentation, an improvement of human labor to make it more effective. Robotics and AI, however, represent a qualitative break with this situation. For the first time in human history, it won't be humans who become more efficient, but rather replaceable, insofar as human augmentation becomes *less* efficient than replacing human labor with robotics. In just a few years, a human using technology will simply be less efficient than a robot that doesn't know an eight-hour day, weekends, or holidays, but can perform monotonous tasks 24/7 on an assembly line without breaking down due to physical ailments or needing medical attention. Wear and tear simply means replacing specific parts of the robot. To return to the initial question: production doesn't require general-purpose robots capable of performing a wide variety of tasks, but rather specialized robots that excel at the specific tasks for which they are needed. Figure02 vividly illustrates why this is only now possible: even the simplest assembly line work still requires delicate manual dexterity because the production line is designed for human hands. This breakthrough has now arrived, but AGI (Automated Generating Intelligence) isn't necessary for robots to be used in production processes. It's sufficient that they can perform monotonous tasks. And that's why I believe 2026 will be the year of the robots. (Clip: Figure02 in production chain at BMW Car-production)
1:24

A Few Thoughts on Robotics The criticism that robotics can only be used in a rather one-sided way is, at the same time, the solution to the problem. What do I mean by that? Since the Industrial Revolution, humanity has increasingly made production methods more efficient. Fordism introduced assembly line work, but this comes at the expense of monotonous, repetitive tasks. On the one hand, immense wealth has been created; on the other hand, countless people suffer from repetitive tasks, which are a direct consequence of that industrial revolution and the division of labor- in other words, assembly line work. The debate about whether AI and robotics could impact the labor market is answered in different ways. I have a clear opinion on this: Up to now, technology has merely been an augmentation, an improvement of human labor to make it more effective. Robotics and AI, however, represent a qualitative break with this situation. For the first time in human history, it won't be humans who become more efficient, but rather replaceable, insofar as human augmentation becomes *less* efficient than replacing human labor with robotics. In just a few years, a human using technology will simply be less efficient than a robot that doesn't know an eight-hour day, weekends, or holidays, but can perform monotonous tasks 24/7 on an assembly line without breaking down due to physical ailments or needing medical attention. Wear and tear simply means replacing specific parts of the robot. To return to the initial question: production doesn't require general-purpose robots capable of performing a wide variety of tasks, but rather specialized robots that excel at the specific tasks for which they are needed. Figure02 vividly illustrates why this is only now possible: even the simplest assembly line work still requires delicate manual dexterity because the production line is designed for human hands. This breakthrough has now arrived, but AGI (Automated Generating Intelligence) isn't necessary for robots to be used in production processes. It's sufficient that they can perform monotonous tasks. And that's why I believe 2026 will be the year of the robots. (Clip: Figure02 in production chain at BMW Car-production)

Chubby♨️

15,228 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This is from today's #WCWS game. This was ruled a base hit when it happened (you can see the 'H' pop up), but was changed to a missed catch error by the first baseman at the bottom of the fourth. This is an impossible catch for the first baseman with a ball thrown from that angle, that hard. This throw has to be to the glove, and while it's not a wild throw, it's low enough that the first baseman cannot get her glove around it in time. This is where replay gets you in trouble. The slo-mo replay makes it look like it's a catchable ball, but it isn't. In real time, at live speed, this isn't an error. This isn't a missed catch or a drop. I was loving the call of a single, especially because it was the first hit, and then, when it was changed, it felt like it was to protect a no-hitter. Everything about this screams "above ordinary effort" ... I would have left this as a single.
0:51

This is from today's #WCWS game. This was ruled a base hit when it happened (you can see the 'H' pop up), but was changed to a missed catch error by the first baseman at the bottom of the fourth. This is an impossible catch for the first baseman with a ball thrown from that angle, that hard. This throw has to be to the glove, and while it's not a wild throw, it's low enough that the first baseman cannot get her glove around it in time. This is where replay gets you in trouble. The slo-mo replay makes it look like it's a catchable ball, but it isn't. In real time, at live speed, this isn't an error. This isn't a missed catch or a drop. I was loving the call of a single, especially because it was the first hit, and then, when it was changed, it felt like it was to protect a no-hitter. Everything about this screams "above ordinary effort" ... I would have left this as a single.

MLB Scoring Changes

30,825 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The more I learn about DNA and the inner workings of our cells, the more I’m convinced that there is a Creator/Force/God. You can call it what you want but to think it’s all just “evolution”, the result of natural selection, seems absolutely absurd to me. I am not saying evolution isn’t real but I am saying that our understanding about the nature of our reality and where we come from is sorely lacking. We like to tell ourselves the “we know the truth”, but the correct answer is that we really don’t know at all. Human origins is the mystery of all mysteries and our arrogance instead of reverence for that mystery is a big reason why evil has gained such a foothold in our world in my opinion. What do you think? Evolution explains it or something else is at play? I don’t claim to know the truth but instinctually feel our explanations are fundamentally flawed. Watch this stunning animation that explains how our DNA is tightly packed up and tell me you are not left with a sense of wonder for the mysterious nature of it all.
6:35

The more I learn about DNA and the inner workings of our cells, the more I’m convinced that there is a Creator/Force/God. You can call it what you want but to think it’s all just “evolution”, the result of natural selection, seems absolutely absurd to me. I am not saying evolution isn’t real but I am saying that our understanding about the nature of our reality and where we come from is sorely lacking. We like to tell ourselves the “we know the truth”, but the correct answer is that we really don’t know at all. Human origins is the mystery of all mysteries and our arrogance instead of reverence for that mystery is a big reason why evil has gained such a foothold in our world in my opinion. What do you think? Evolution explains it or something else is at play? I don’t claim to know the truth but instinctually feel our explanations are fundamentally flawed. Watch this stunning animation that explains how our DNA is tightly packed up and tell me you are not left with a sense of wonder for the mysterious nature of it all.

Champagne Joshi

149,527 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

FREENBECKY THE AIR PRESS TOUR #Ch7HDxเสน่หาวาโย #เที่ยงบันเทิงทอล์กxฟรีนเบค : it comes to the question many people want to know, when you’ve worked as a couple for a long time, and then separate to work in different lines or something like that, how much does it start to feel different from before, freen? 🐰: no i feel the same. i mean... yes, i always support the nong, it has been like this since the beginning, and even now it’s still like that. i feel that way because we still have a series together, we’re still sitting here together, and doing promo like this together. so i don’t know in what way we would have to work separately. 🐰: actually, it’s... what should i call it... becky’s passion and my passion are already clear, each person has likes or interests that are not the same, i like art and things like that, while becky has a passion for acting and things like that, it’s a different path, but it doesn’t mean we have to go in different directions all the time. 🦦: i actually agree. honestly no matter where p’freen is, even if we don’t meet, we’re always encouraging each other. like p’freen said, everyone’s passion is quite clear. p’freen is more into art, like an artist vibe, she likes writing this and that. for me, it’s singing and acting. i want to push this passion as far as i can too. but... we are still right here, we still have series (the air) together. : there’s still have works you can join together, right? 🐰🦦: yes. : so let me emphasize, the question of whether it’s true or not that you two are going your separate ways for work... the answer is... 🐰🦦: *smile* : not true! not true at all! i answer it for them. there will be projects where you’ll cross paths again, like this series.
2:14

FREENBECKY THE AIR PRESS TOUR #Ch7HDxเสน่หาวาโย #เที่ยงบันเทิงทอล์กxฟรีนเบค : it comes to the question many people want to know, when you’ve worked as a couple for a long time, and then separate to work in different lines or something like that, how much does it start to feel different from before, freen? 🐰: no i feel the same. i mean... yes, i always support the nong, it has been like this since the beginning, and even now it’s still like that. i feel that way because we still have a series together, we’re still sitting here together, and doing promo like this together. so i don’t know in what way we would have to work separately. 🐰: actually, it’s... what should i call it... becky’s passion and my passion are already clear, each person has likes or interests that are not the same, i like art and things like that, while becky has a passion for acting and things like that, it’s a different path, but it doesn’t mean we have to go in different directions all the time. 🦦: i actually agree. honestly no matter where p’freen is, even if we don’t meet, we’re always encouraging each other. like p’freen said, everyone’s passion is quite clear. p’freen is more into art, like an artist vibe, she likes writing this and that. for me, it’s singing and acting. i want to push this passion as far as i can too. but... we are still right here, we still have series (the air) together. : there’s still have works you can join together, right? 🐰🦦: yes. : so let me emphasize, the question of whether it’s true or not that you two are going your separate ways for work... the answer is... 🐰🦦: *smile* : not true! not true at all! i answer it for them. there will be projects where you’ll cross paths again, like this series.

S 🦦

18,610 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”
1:52

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,682 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Japan Just Built a HouseBot You Control Without Speaking and It Changes Everything! Donut Robotics has officially unveiled its first bipedal humanoid, Cinnamon 1, and instead of focusing on louder voices or bigger motors, the company went in the opposite direction. Silence. Cinnamon 1 introduces what Donut Robotics calls Silent Gesture Control, a system that allows the humanoid to be guided using simple hand and finger movements rather than spoken commands. This approach feels especially well suited for real world environments where traditional voice control falls apart. Busy factory floors. Construction sites filled with constant noise. Even quiet indoor settings where voice commands feel awkward or intrusive. It also opens the door for far more accessible human robot interaction, particularly for users with impairments. While the current Cinnamon 1 hardware is built on an OEM platform, the intelligence driving it is where Donut Robotics is placing its long term bet. The team is actively developing custom Vision Language Action AI that allows the robot to interpret what it sees, understand intent, and respond with physical action. The goal is not just smarter robots, but robots that feel more natural. Even more ambitious is the company’s plan for full domestic production. Donut Robotics has stated its intention to localize both manufacturing and AI development in Japan, reinforcing the country’s reputation for precision engineering and thoughtful robotics design. If timelines hold, Cinnamon 1 units are expected to begin deployment in factories and construction environments by the end of 2026. That puts this humanoid squarely in the category of near term reality rather than distant concept. The takeaway is simple but important. As humanoid robots move out of labs and into daily work environments, the winners may not be the loudest or flashiest machines. They may be the ones that understand us without a word being spoken.
0:31

Japan Just Built a HouseBot You Control Without Speaking and It Changes Everything! Donut Robotics has officially unveiled its first bipedal humanoid, Cinnamon 1, and instead of focusing on louder voices or bigger motors, the company went in the opposite direction. Silence. Cinnamon 1 introduces what Donut Robotics calls Silent Gesture Control, a system that allows the humanoid to be guided using simple hand and finger movements rather than spoken commands. This approach feels especially well suited for real world environments where traditional voice control falls apart. Busy factory floors. Construction sites filled with constant noise. Even quiet indoor settings where voice commands feel awkward or intrusive. It also opens the door for far more accessible human robot interaction, particularly for users with impairments. While the current Cinnamon 1 hardware is built on an OEM platform, the intelligence driving it is where Donut Robotics is placing its long term bet. The team is actively developing custom Vision Language Action AI that allows the robot to interpret what it sees, understand intent, and respond with physical action. The goal is not just smarter robots, but robots that feel more natural. Even more ambitious is the company’s plan for full domestic production. Donut Robotics has stated its intention to localize both manufacturing and AI development in Japan, reinforcing the country’s reputation for precision engineering and thoughtful robotics design. If timelines hold, Cinnamon 1 units are expected to begin deployment in factories and construction environments by the end of 2026. That puts this humanoid squarely in the category of near term reality rather than distant concept. The takeaway is simple but important. As humanoid robots move out of labs and into daily work environments, the winners may not be the loudest or flashiest machines. They may be the ones that understand us without a word being spoken.

The AI Robot Guy on X

257,928 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Sebastian’s message at the end of Saladino’s zoom call: “The one thing that is on my mind is that, the beginning of this Charles Bukowski poem that says, “Your life is your life.”, and like, “don’t let it go down into darkness and submission” or something. You only get this one life, I always feel like we gotta try, if possible — and I say if possible because I’m always aware that people are encountering massive, massive challenges, and are overcoming traumas and circumstances beyond their control, and the world is insane, there’s so many things and pressure, but, again, we only have this one life, and I think about that a lot. I just think, if there’s a way to just be kinder to yourself, and even if it’s about just being here today, putting in this work, and if you’ve done this a couple of years, great, and you’re gonna do it again or not, or you’re gonna try something else. Or even if you don’t feel 100%, be kinder to yourself. If the thing isn’t turning out to be what you’ve thought, be kinder to yourself. Just try to not let you beat yourself down or let this [points to phone] or anybody else just beat yourself down, because it’s so easy to do that. I would say that, that’s my big takeaway.” 📲 malo.stan | TikTok
1:39

Sebastian’s message at the end of Saladino’s zoom call: “The one thing that is on my mind is that, the beginning of this Charles Bukowski poem that says, “Your life is your life.”, and like, “don’t let it go down into darkness and submission” or something. You only get this one life, I always feel like we gotta try, if possible — and I say if possible because I’m always aware that people are encountering massive, massive challenges, and are overcoming traumas and circumstances beyond their control, and the world is insane, there’s so many things and pressure, but, again, we only have this one life, and I think about that a lot. I just think, if there’s a way to just be kinder to yourself, and even if it’s about just being here today, putting in this work, and if you’ve done this a couple of years, great, and you’re gonna do it again or not, or you’re gonna try something else. Or even if you don’t feel 100%, be kinder to yourself. If the thing isn’t turning out to be what you’ve thought, be kinder to yourself. Just try to not let you beat yourself down or let this [points to phone] or anybody else just beat yourself down, because it’s so easy to do that. I would say that, that’s my big takeaway.” 📲 malo.stan | TikTok

Sebastian Stan Archive

12,003 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I’m camping right now in beautiful Humboldt Redwoods and I can’t help but to believe that the Cybertruck is the ULTIMATE camping vehicle. 1/ The Cybertruck has minimum maintenance required. Zero oil changes or broken parts in the middle of nowhere. With no engine, no transmission, and materially less moving parts, the vehicle is built to operate efficiently, just plug in and go. 2/ The Cybertruck has no paint. No paint means no scratches to worry about. Its ultra-hard stainless steel body is made to take hits from branches, rocks, and anything nature throws at me. You can drive it through the wild and still pull up anywhere looking like a beast. 3/ The Cybertruck has a massive battery pack. It allows me to drive over 300 miles and at the same time is my off-grid power source. I can charge devices, cook meals, run Starlink for high-speed internet, and even plug in lights and tools. It’s like bringing my own mini power station into the wild. 4/ The Cybertruck drives itself. Full Self Driving handles the entire drive while I get to enjoy the view. Whether I’m headed deep into the forest or going to the city, this tech is like having your own personal driver that gets smarter, is the safest, and never gets tired. 5/ The Cybertruck is built for any terrain. With adaptive air suspensions, all-wheel drive (3 motors for the Cyberbeast), and major ground clearance, the Cybertruck dominates dirt trails, rocky paths, mud, you name it. This beast was born to get down and dirty for any situation. This truck makes me feel like the future just pulled up to my campsite, and from this moment on, camping will never be the same again. I love my Cybertruck.
1:42

I’m camping right now in beautiful Humboldt Redwoods and I can’t help but to believe that the Cybertruck is the ULTIMATE camping vehicle. 1/ The Cybertruck has minimum maintenance required. Zero oil changes or broken parts in the middle of nowhere. With no engine, no transmission, and materially less moving parts, the vehicle is built to operate efficiently, just plug in and go. 2/ The Cybertruck has no paint. No paint means no scratches to worry about. Its ultra-hard stainless steel body is made to take hits from branches, rocks, and anything nature throws at me. You can drive it through the wild and still pull up anywhere looking like a beast. 3/ The Cybertruck has a massive battery pack. It allows me to drive over 300 miles and at the same time is my off-grid power source. I can charge devices, cook meals, run Starlink for high-speed internet, and even plug in lights and tools. It’s like bringing my own mini power station into the wild. 4/ The Cybertruck drives itself. Full Self Driving handles the entire drive while I get to enjoy the view. Whether I’m headed deep into the forest or going to the city, this tech is like having your own personal driver that gets smarter, is the safest, and never gets tired. 5/ The Cybertruck is built for any terrain. With adaptive air suspensions, all-wheel drive (3 motors for the Cyberbeast), and major ground clearance, the Cybertruck dominates dirt trails, rocky paths, mud, you name it. This beast was born to get down and dirty for any situation. This truck makes me feel like the future just pulled up to my campsite, and from this moment on, camping will never be the same again. I love my Cybertruck.

Teslaconomics

26,405 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Interview from 5 months ago with “RA” the new UFO whistleblower Randy Anderson by Gerb Here he describes the sphere encounter and the possible consciousness connection and how his memories of the incident are strangely fuzzy Link to full interview in comments H/T wow RA - “Both the items they had under there, they said somehow interacted with consciousness and, and the way he said it, this is why it's so fuzzy, he said, I wouldn't quote these things 'cause I'm gonna try to just remember the, the, the context. And I, and I can again, like when I meditate and I think about this, I can usually get more back. But just, just like sitting here talking to you and remembering it, it's difficult sometimes. But I remember him saying, we don't understand quite how to operate the systems or how they, but they do interact with consciousness so certain and some people they interact with and some people they don't. So certain people will go up to the object and it will respond. And some people go up to the object and it does nothing. So certain types of, I don't know if that's related to DNA or to consciousness or what, whatever, but it's different. People will have a different response and they, they had us kind of walked closer to the, the window and nothing happened. So we didn't, I mean, I don't know if we got closer or something would've happened, but they, I don't know if they were even looking for that, but maybe, you know, that they, that's one thing he said that like certain people will go near the object and will react. And he didn't describe how it would react. He instead it would react,” RA - “There's a really weird component to this, and I don't know what this means, but when I think back to this particular memory and, and this never happens to me in any other thing, I, I get real fuzzy. It gets real fuzzy, like, like almost like something was purposely done to to, to make it that way. Because I have a very photographic memory and things I've done in the military. Like I can tell you the color of the buttons on a shirt of a guy that I sniped from, you know, 800 feet, 800 meters away. So I mean, I, there's for me to not remember this is really bothers me, but there's, there's some cloudiness when I try to access this part of my brain, you know, I can definitely, maybe it's, it could definitely be the, the objects itself that had, and it felt this, this is why it's difficult because it obviously, it felt weird being down there. Okay. There's, there's something like, there was just, it is an unnatural feeling we're doing. It felt like we were doing something that wasn't normal. I mean, the fact that we were so deep underground, me and the dude were kind of freaked out and, and, but we didn't display that outwardly because we're trained to not do that, you know? But internally, yeah, I was like, what the hell is going on? And when they talk about optimal stuff, they didn't say it like, by the way, aliens are real like you or anything like of that sort. It was just, oh yeah, this is the off world technology division, this is Chuck, this is whatever. And just started talking like everything was normal and we just went along with it because we acted like it was normal, but the first time I'd ever been exposed to it and it, it was a lot to take in. So that could be part of it too.”
4:48

Interview from 5 months ago with “RA” the new UFO whistleblower Randy Anderson by Gerb Here he describes the sphere encounter and the possible consciousness connection and how his memories of the incident are strangely fuzzy Link to full interview in comments H/T wow RA - “Both the items they had under there, they said somehow interacted with consciousness and, and the way he said it, this is why it's so fuzzy, he said, I wouldn't quote these things 'cause I'm gonna try to just remember the, the, the context. And I, and I can again, like when I meditate and I think about this, I can usually get more back. But just, just like sitting here talking to you and remembering it, it's difficult sometimes. But I remember him saying, we don't understand quite how to operate the systems or how they, but they do interact with consciousness so certain and some people they interact with and some people they don't. So certain people will go up to the object and it will respond. And some people go up to the object and it does nothing. So certain types of, I don't know if that's related to DNA or to consciousness or what, whatever, but it's different. People will have a different response and they, they had us kind of walked closer to the, the window and nothing happened. So we didn't, I mean, I don't know if we got closer or something would've happened, but they, I don't know if they were even looking for that, but maybe, you know, that they, that's one thing he said that like certain people will go near the object and will react. And he didn't describe how it would react. He instead it would react,” RA - “There's a really weird component to this, and I don't know what this means, but when I think back to this particular memory and, and this never happens to me in any other thing, I, I get real fuzzy. It gets real fuzzy, like, like almost like something was purposely done to to, to make it that way. Because I have a very photographic memory and things I've done in the military. Like I can tell you the color of the buttons on a shirt of a guy that I sniped from, you know, 800 feet, 800 meters away. So I mean, I, there's for me to not remember this is really bothers me, but there's, there's some cloudiness when I try to access this part of my brain, you know, I can definitely, maybe it's, it could definitely be the, the objects itself that had, and it felt this, this is why it's difficult because it obviously, it felt weird being down there. Okay. There's, there's something like, there was just, it is an unnatural feeling we're doing. It felt like we were doing something that wasn't normal. I mean, the fact that we were so deep underground, me and the dude were kind of freaked out and, and, but we didn't display that outwardly because we're trained to not do that, you know? But internally, yeah, I was like, what the hell is going on? And when they talk about optimal stuff, they didn't say it like, by the way, aliens are real like you or anything like of that sort. It was just, oh yeah, this is the off world technology division, this is Chuck, this is whatever. And just started talking like everything was normal and we just went along with it because we acted like it was normal, but the first time I'd ever been exposed to it and it, it was a lot to take in. So that could be part of it too.”

neandrewthal

41,422 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Here’s a very small story about the kind of leader Geoff Duncan is, and has been, from my time working with him my first term. When I served in the state Senate, the first bill I ever filed was hijacked. It passed out of the Senate, through House committee, and made it all the way through House Rules, at which point it was yanked back. (I actually appreciated the House GOP leadership for telling me this so plainly—it saved me a lot of time—but essentially I was told: “We like your policy. We don’t like your name on it. So we’re going to give it to a Republican woman.”) And…I get it. Sometimes that’s how it works in this place. It’s about the work, and the policy, not about getting credit. What we actually do and the people we help is what’s most important. But the thing I remember about this process was meeting with Geoff early in my first term, his encouragement, his telling me how he recognized good work when he saw it. I remember the ways he helped me, in the small, invisible ways it takes, to help this first-year nobody in the minority party to move her first bill. And he didn’t like what ultimately happened to that bill, because he believed—has always believed—in people over politics. The following year, that bill came back to us for a final vote. (Without my name in it, of course.) But he saw it, and remembered it, and did something so kind, and frankly unprecedented. He called me up to the rostrum, gave me the gavel, and allowed me to preside over the passage of my own bill. It was the first bill I ever wrote as a lawmaker, and it was ultimately signed into law the Spring of 2022. (Of note, this was also the first and last time we had two women physicians speaking together from the rostrum of the state Senate. And I know there were no subsequent times, because there are still only two of us.) Is this a huge story? No. Was this the most life-changing thing that ever happened in my time at the state Capitol? No. But that’s actually why it’s important. Because the true mark of leadership, and personal character, is what you do when you don’t *have* to. It’s when you show, rather than tell. It’s when you practice mentorship, true bipartisanship, strength of character, and genuine, human kindness, even when no one else might notice or care. Think for a second if we would ever see this in today’s legislative environment. And ask yourself if we would be better to have more moments, and leaders, like this. Geoff is the kind of leader I want to see leading our state. And I know, with our support, that he can win. And that’s why I’m endorsing him to be the next governor of Georgia.
3:26

Here’s a very small story about the kind of leader Geoff Duncan is, and has been, from my time working with him my first term. When I served in the state Senate, the first bill I ever filed was hijacked. It passed out of the Senate, through House committee, and made it all the way through House Rules, at which point it was yanked back. (I actually appreciated the House GOP leadership for telling me this so plainly—it saved me a lot of time—but essentially I was told: “We like your policy. We don’t like your name on it. So we’re going to give it to a Republican woman.”) And…I get it. Sometimes that’s how it works in this place. It’s about the work, and the policy, not about getting credit. What we actually do and the people we help is what’s most important. But the thing I remember about this process was meeting with Geoff early in my first term, his encouragement, his telling me how he recognized good work when he saw it. I remember the ways he helped me, in the small, invisible ways it takes, to help this first-year nobody in the minority party to move her first bill. And he didn’t like what ultimately happened to that bill, because he believed—has always believed—in people over politics. The following year, that bill came back to us for a final vote. (Without my name in it, of course.) But he saw it, and remembered it, and did something so kind, and frankly unprecedented. He called me up to the rostrum, gave me the gavel, and allowed me to preside over the passage of my own bill. It was the first bill I ever wrote as a lawmaker, and it was ultimately signed into law the Spring of 2022. (Of note, this was also the first and last time we had two women physicians speaking together from the rostrum of the state Senate. And I know there were no subsequent times, because there are still only two of us.) Is this a huge story? No. Was this the most life-changing thing that ever happened in my time at the state Capitol? No. But that’s actually why it’s important. Because the true mark of leadership, and personal character, is what you do when you don’t *have* to. It’s when you show, rather than tell. It’s when you practice mentorship, true bipartisanship, strength of character, and genuine, human kindness, even when no one else might notice or care. Think for a second if we would ever see this in today’s legislative environment. And ask yourself if we would be better to have more moments, and leaders, like this. Geoff is the kind of leader I want to see leading our state. And I know, with our support, that he can win. And that’s why I’m endorsing him to be the next governor of Georgia.

Dr. Michelle Au

31,393 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce