Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I tested Github Copilot's latest "Cursor killer" features, and the results were... not as I expected Here's my in-depth review of Copilot vs Cursor:

41,291 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Steve (Builder.io)'s profile picture
Steve (Builder.io)1 year ago

Read the full review + comparison on the blog:

Volo's profile picture
Volo1 year ago

LOL dude, yes! I was shocked in the same way as you. Endless UX issues and failing on simple changes. Crazy to see the quality difference despite both using Sonnet 3.5

Adam ᯅ's profile picture
Adam ᯅ1 year ago

had the same issue with hallucination even after providing the context from the documentation. tagging web into cursor and asking it to reference the latest doc worked first try.

Govind K's profile picture
Govind K1 year ago

Congrats to @cursor_ai and @windsurf_ai While we may all have access to o3 like reasoning soon, the real magic will happen with extensions, memory, and UX. Healthy competition drives us all to innovate - excited to see what's ahead! 🚀 @mariorod1

Eric Peña's profile picture
Eric Peña1 year ago

I 💙 Cursor

Alex Sidorenko's profile picture
Alex Sidorenko1 year ago

Great vid, thanks! I wanted to switch back to vscode for a bit to try claude there, but now I don't need to 😅

Douglas Lopes's profile picture
Douglas Lopes1 year ago

Shoudn't you comparing both free and both lower cost plan side by side instead?

Akshay's profile picture
Akshay1 year ago

Yes this was my experience as well, it's super slow and pretty bad at editing. The auto complete works like 20% of the time and other times it just gets in the way. Sticking to @cursor_ai for now.

Alpha Novax's profile picture
Alpha Novax1 year ago

Cursor rules !

thisthatstores's profile picture
thisthatstores1 year ago

I was just as shocked. I’ve never tried copilot before and now that I have, I didn’t miss much 😅

Related Videos