正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I tested Github Copilot's latest "Cursor killer" features, and the results were... not as I expected Here's my in-depth review of Copilot vs Cursor:

41,291 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Steve (Builder.io) 的头像
Steve (Builder.io)1 年前

Read the full review + comparison on the blog:

Volo 的头像
Volo1 年前

LOL dude, yes! I was shocked in the same way as you. Endless UX issues and failing on simple changes. Crazy to see the quality difference despite both using Sonnet 3.5

Adam ᯅ 的头像
Adam ᯅ1 年前

had the same issue with hallucination even after providing the context from the documentation. tagging web into cursor and asking it to reference the latest doc worked first try.

Govind K 的头像
Govind K1 年前

Congrats to @cursor_ai and @windsurf_ai While we may all have access to o3 like reasoning soon, the real magic will happen with extensions, memory, and UX. Healthy competition drives us all to innovate - excited to see what's ahead! 🚀 @mariorod1

Eric Peña 的头像
Eric Peña1 年前

I 💙 Cursor

Alex Sidorenko 的头像
Alex Sidorenko1 年前

Great vid, thanks! I wanted to switch back to vscode for a bit to try claude there, but now I don't need to 😅

Douglas Lopes 的头像
Douglas Lopes1 年前

Shoudn't you comparing both free and both lower cost plan side by side instead?

Akshay 的头像
Akshay1 年前

Yes this was my experience as well, it's super slow and pretty bad at editing. The auto complete works like 20% of the time and other times it just gets in the way. Sticking to @cursor_ai for now.

Alpha Novax 的头像
Alpha Novax1 年前

Cursor rules !

thisthatstores 的头像
thisthatstores1 年前

I was just as shocked. I’ve never tried copilot before and now that I have, I didn’t miss much 😅

相关视频