Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I tested Github Copilot's latest "Cursor killer" features, and the results were... not as I expected Here's my in-depth review of Copilot vs Cursor:

41,293 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Steve (Builder.io)
Steve (Builder.io)1 год назад

Read the full review + comparison on the blog:

Фото профиля Volo
Volo1 год назад

LOL dude, yes! I was shocked in the same way as you. Endless UX issues and failing on simple changes. Crazy to see the quality difference despite both using Sonnet 3.5

Фото профиля Adam ᯅ
Adam ᯅ1 год назад

had the same issue with hallucination even after providing the context from the documentation. tagging web into cursor and asking it to reference the latest doc worked first try.

Фото профиля Govind K
Govind K1 год назад

Congrats to @cursor_ai and @windsurf_ai While we may all have access to o3 like reasoning soon, the real magic will happen with extensions, memory, and UX. Healthy competition drives us all to innovate - excited to see what's ahead! 🚀 @mariorod1

Фото профиля Eric Peña
Eric Peña1 год назад

I 💙 Cursor

Фото профиля Alex Sidorenko
Alex Sidorenko1 год назад

Great vid, thanks! I wanted to switch back to vscode for a bit to try claude there, but now I don't need to 😅

Фото профиля Douglas Lopes
Douglas Lopes1 год назад

Shoudn't you comparing both free and both lower cost plan side by side instead?

Фото профиля Akshay
Akshay1 год назад

Yes this was my experience as well, it's super slow and pretty bad at editing. The auto complete works like 20% of the time and other times it just gets in the way. Sticking to @cursor_ai for now.

Фото профиля Alpha Novax
Alpha Novax1 год назад

Cursor rules !

Фото профиля thisthatstores
thisthatstores1 год назад

I was just as shocked. I’ve never tried copilot before and now that I have, I didn’t miss much 😅

Похожие видео