正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I turned Jev into an image model…? Presenting Jevinci! The paintings are pure JS, no AI image-gen. Jev predicts every pixel's color in parallel and we paint them. The more confident Jev is in a prediction, the wider the brush. (sped up 4x)

Anshu

16,170 subscribers

75,445 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 条评论

qray 的头像

qray2 天前

@typesafeai Now this is one impressive usecase that ive seen for Jev. nice work!

Alps 的头像

Alps1 天前

@typesafeai @whatRanjuSaid @distributedkv 😭wth

Tak 🦞 的头像

Tak 🦞2 天前

@typesafeai How

Anshu 的头像

Anshu2 天前

@typesafeai You can read the code! I basically told Astra what I wanted and kept having it adjust the art style till I liked it, but the actual “art” is all coming from Jev You can think of it like a very weird visualization of a grid of probability distributions

AI Mastery Guide 的头像

AI Mastery Guide1 天前

@typesafeai predicting pixels to paint is such a wild idea

Phanindra Reddy 的头像

Phanindra Reddy2 天前

@typesafeai so damm good, love it this is curation of jev use cases (opensource), love to have your one here

Doug 的头像

Doug1 天前

@typesafeai This is not the way. Let art belong to the artists.

designer 的头像

designer1 天前

@typesafeai Whoa… you invented generative art that’s crazy

Sacha Sayan 的头像

Sacha Sayan2 天前

@typesafeai That paint texture is a beauty. ❤️

Manas Vaze 的头像

Manas Vaze1 天前

@typesafeai 🔥 🔥

afedb 的头像

afedb1 天前

@typesafeai cool project 👏

Shubhu 的头像

Shubhu2 天前

@typesafeai thanks for sharing! can you check dm once?

相关视频

sharing an easy way to test DJev (Diffusion Gemma Jev), the next evolution of the incredible jev concept and fully open sourced (model, code, api...) imagine jev but it also has: - native image-input support - native image as options!! - real-time video streaming input - as fast as jev (not with images, 600ms) - same price as jev, but can get even cheaper - using Diffusion Gemma adapted - we are seeing on-par performance but happy to have external validation! It is a research preview made for fun, so don't expect stability and the awesome scaling as jev team has delivered! this was a weekend project :) have fun!

sharing an easy way to test DJev (Diffusion Gemma Jev), the next evolution of the incredible jev concept and fully open sourced (model, code, api...) imagine jev but it also has: - native image-input support - native image as options!! - real-time video streaming input - as fast as jev (not with images, 600ms) - same price as jev, but can get even cheaper - using Diffusion Gemma adapted - we are seeing on-par performance but happy to have external validation! It is a research preview made for fun, so don't expect stability and the awesome scaling as jev team has delivered! this was a weekend project :) have fun!

David Villalón

18,828 次观看 • 1 天前

Jev Engineering is the layer most agent stacks are still missing. state → decision → action → verification → next state up to 193x faster and 444x cheaper in our tests. everyone is optimizing the model. Jev Engineering optimizes what happens between model calls. every agent eventually hits the same fork: state → multiple possible actions → one route has to win instead of sending every decision back to an expensive LLM call, Jev turns that into a dedicated layer: so the loop becomes: LLM → reason Jev → decide tools / agents → execute state → update Jev → decide again once decisions become their own engineering layer, you can benchmark, batch and verify them separately. full blueprint in article ↓

Jev Engineering is the layer most agent stacks are still missing. state → decision → action → verification → next state up to 193x faster and 444x cheaper in our tests. everyone is optimizing the model. Jev Engineering optimizes what happens between model calls. every agent eventually hits the same fork: state → multiple possible actions → one route has to win instead of sending every decision back to an expensive LLM call, Jev turns that into a dedicated layer: so the loop becomes: LLM → reason Jev → decide tools / agents → execute state → update Jev → decide again once decisions become their own engineering layer, you can benchmark, batch and verify them separately. full blueprint in article ↓

Ricker

83,098 次观看 • 1 天前

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code era. Claude Code is still part of the assistance era - Jev is the next step Jev is x200 faster, x400 cheaper and has 0 hallucination. This is what comes after RLHF" In 17 minutes he explains why every model you use has a human-shaped flaw baked into it and why Jev is better worth more than a $500 Claude Code engineering course watch today, then read how to actually boost yourself x100 with Jev in the post below

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code era. Claude Code is still part of the assistance era - Jev is the next step Jev is x200 faster, x400 cheaper and has 0 hallucination. This is what comes after RLHF" In 17 minutes he explains why every model you use has a human-shaped flaw baked into it and why Jev is better worth more than a $500 Claude Code engineering course watch today, then read how to actually boost yourself x100 with Jev in the post below

Codez

175,262 次观看 • 2 天前

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code or Codex era, they are still part of the assistance era with human in the loop - JEV is what comes next for LLMs x200 faster, x400 cheaper, 0 hallucination, no human in the loop - that's JEV, this is how LLMs will look like" in 36-minute tech talk, Jev Founder explained why RLHF isn't a thing anymore and how modern LLMs will be built this talk is worth more than a Stanford Machine Learning degree watch today no matter what, then learn how to become a Jev Engineer in the article below

Jev Founder, Diogo Almeida (ex-OpenAI): "The next era is not the Claude Code or Codex era, they are still part of the assistance era with human in the loop - JEV is what comes next for LLMs x200 faster, x400 cheaper, 0 hallucination, no human in the loop - that's JEV, this is how LLMs will look like" in 36-minute tech talk, Jev Founder explained why RLHF isn't a thing anymore and how modern LLMs will be built this talk is worth more than a Stanford Machine Learning degree watch today no matter what, then learn how to become a Jev Engineer in the article below

Codez

228,233 次观看 • 1 天前

TypeGPU + ruNNtime + Jev TypeSafe AI is a very fun combo :D ruNNtime gives me efficient local inference, TypeGPU lets inference and rendering share GPU resources directly with zero copy. That’s 3 separate NN inferences plus rendering, all happening in realtime Since we control the pipeline, Jev can just sit in the middle and add the semantic bit. camera + mic → Moonshine + YOLO26 + DepthART → Jev → lights, shadows and bloom

TypeGPU + ruNNtime + Jev TypeSafe AI is a very fun combo :D ruNNtime gives me efficient local inference, TypeGPU lets inference and rendering share GPU resources directly with zero copy. That’s 3 separate NN inferences plus rendering, all happening in realtime Since we control the pipeline, Jev can just sit in the middle and add the semantic bit. camera + mic → Moonshine + YOLO26 + DepthART → Jev → lights, shadows and bloom

Konrad Reczko

86,950 次观看 • 3 天前

I just built a Jev X Viral Post Analyser. 100,000 viral X posts. 20.4 seconds. $0.67. Claude Opus 5, same corpus, same clock, got through 214 posts and spent $0.98. per post that is ~680x cheaper the full Opus pass would have run $458. viral analysis is the perfect Jev job. • it is not writing, it is 14 yes/no calls per post: > does the hook open a loop, > is there a number in the first line, > is the proof real or claimed. classification, not prose. • what it found: 1,220 posts broke into the top 1%. baseline 1.22%. > superlative claim - 2.34% viral. 1.92x baseline > contrarian take - 1.59%. 1.31x > launch / tool drop - 1.46%. 1.19x and numbered lists, the thing everyone writes: 0.55%. below baseline. the most used hook is the least viral one. full stop. • what you are watching: left is the post under analysis, right is Jev answering 14 typed questions about it, each with a confidence score. the run stops at 20.4s because that is when Jev finished all 100k. pulled the corpus through a few X APIs, one parallel pass into Jev. should I drop it to public? Read my latest article on Jev Engineering below and turn your ideas into reality.

I just built a Jev X Viral Post Analyser. 100,000 viral X posts. 20.4 seconds. $0.67. Claude Opus 5, same corpus, same clock, got through 214 posts and spent $0.98. per post that is ~680x cheaper the full Opus pass would have run $458. viral analysis is the perfect Jev job. • it is not writing, it is 14 yes/no calls per post: > does the hook open a loop, > is there a number in the first line, > is the proof real or claimed. classification, not prose. • what it found: 1,220 posts broke into the top 1%. baseline 1.22%. > superlative claim - 2.34% viral. 1.92x baseline > contrarian take - 1.59%. 1.31x > launch / tool drop - 1.46%. 1.19x and numbered lists, the thing everyone writes: 0.55%. below baseline. the most used hook is the least viral one. full stop. • what you are watching: left is the post under analysis, right is Jev answering 14 typed questions about it, each with a confidence score. the run stops at 20.4s because that is when Jev finished all 100k. pulled the corpus through a few X APIs, one parallel pass into Jev. should I drop it to public? Read my latest article on Jev Engineering below and turn your ideas into reality.

Movez

64,438 次观看 • 1 天前

Jev VS Fable 5.1 VS GPT-6 Astra: chess typesafe's new Jev V13 isn't an LLM. it doesn't chat, doesn't explain, doesn't write code — it only makes decisions. so we made it play blitz against frontier LLMs. the test: 5+0 blitz. every move is one API call. Jev V13 vs Fable 5.1: • fable outplayed it. by move 29 it was +16 in material and even promoted a second queen • but it kept burning 6-15 seconds per move on analysis. jev answered in ~2.6s • so fable didn't have enough time and lost Jev V13 vs Astra: • astra didn't bother winning on material. it mated jev in 18 moves. Qe1#, with 2:27 to spare

Jev VS Fable 5.1 VS GPT-6 Astra: chess typesafe's new Jev V13 isn't an LLM. it doesn't chat, doesn't explain, doesn't write code — it only makes decisions. so we made it play blitz against frontier LLMs. the test: 5+0 blitz. every move is one API call. Jev V13 vs Fable 5.1: • fable outplayed it. by move 29 it was +16 in material and even promoted a second queen • but it kept burning 6-15 seconds per move on analysis. jev answered in ~2.6s • so fable didn't have enough time and lost Jev V13 vs Astra: • astra didn't bother winning on material. it mated jev in 18 moves. Qe1#, with 2:27 to spare

AI/ML API

544,717 次观看 • 4 天前

Jev controls every traffic light in this city when I turn it off the average wait time rises by more than 600% we need this rn

Jev controls every traffic light in this city when I turn it off the average wait time rises by more than 600% we need this rn

leo

480,006 次观看 • 1 天前

If you didn't feel the ongoing revolution, here is my second project I built with jev. Your software is drastically outdated. It contains a lot of instructions your CPU executes one by one. Why if we can simply ask Jev for the next instructions to execute Introducing Jevassembler! It is a new approach to execute something on CPU. You don't need to wait for code to be written, you don't need to compile anything and YOU DON'T NEED CODE. You just give it a task and Jev predicts the next instruction to execute. In runtime. who needs compilers if you have AI

If you didn't feel the ongoing revolution, here is my second project I built with jev. Your software is drastically outdated. It contains a lot of instructions your CPU executes one by one. Why if we can simply ask Jev for the next instructions to execute Introducing Jevassembler! It is a new approach to execute something on CPU. You don't need to wait for code to be written, you don't need to compile anything and YOU DON'T NEED CODE. You just give it a task and Jev predicts the next instruction to execute. In runtime. who needs compilers if you have AI

Dmitriy Kovalenko

182,965 次观看 • 1 天前

I built a chat bot with jev, no LLM at all! Responses are instant, no hallucinations. I hooked it up to web search, wikipedia, weather, todoist and home assistant. Jev decides what tool to call and what args to use based on the prompt. Instant answers cite sources as well!

I built a chat bot with jev, no LLM at all! Responses are instant, no hallucinations. I hooked it up to web search, wikipedia, weather, todoist and home assistant. Jev decides what tool to call and what args to use based on the prompt. Instant answers cite sources as well!

CJ (Coding Garden)

110,921 次观看 • 3 天前

Also have been playing with TypeSafe AI Jev, insane! So many immediate use cases and new apps are possible. What a time to be a builder! Sharing some experiments here starting with: Keystroke oracle / predictive launcher: Your launcher ranks by aliases, fuzzy match, and habit. Jev reads intent: type "the pdf I just downloaded" and the newest PDF is already the top hit with a full confidence on every keystroke, in ~100 ms

Also have been playing with TypeSafe AI Jev, insane! So many immediate use cases and new apps are possible. What a time to be a builder! Sharing some experiments here starting with: Keystroke oracle / predictive launcher: Your launcher ranks by aliases, fuzzy match, and habit. Jev reads intent: type "the pdf I just downloaded" and the newest PDF is already the top hit with a full confidence on every keystroke, in ~100 ms

nader dabit

418,779 次观看 • 2 天前

GPT 6 Astra × GPT Image 2.5 is a killer combination. I used @/sketch to draw a fighter jet. GPT Image 2.5 turned the sketch into a realistic image. Then GPT 6 Astra turned that image into a 3D model in Blender.

GPT 6 Astra × GPT Image 2.5 is a killer combination. I used @/sketch to draw a fighter jet. GPT Image 2.5 turned the sketch into a realistic image. Then GPT 6 Astra turned that image into a 3D model in Blender.

Karan

10,243 次观看 • 12 天前

Jev is WILD for SEO audit 🤯 in 45.1 seconds it read all 586 pages on my site and rebuilt the internal link map. 584 links placed, 139 pages it refused to link because nothing honestly fit. total cost $0.21. Claude Opus 5, same 586 pages, same clock, got through 21 of them and spent $1.43. per page that is ~190x cheaper. the full Opus pass would have run $43. internal linking is the perfect Jev job. it is not writing, it is 8,790 yes/no calls: does this page have a real reason to link to that one, and is there anchor text already sitting in the copy. that is a classification problem, and we have been paying frontier prices to do it one page at a time. what you are watching: left column is Jev, right is Opus, same queue, same rubric. the run stops the moment Jev finishes so Opus stops burning tokens. coming soon to Distribb + connector + gpt plugin

Jev is WILD for SEO audit 🤯 in 45.1 seconds it read all 586 pages on my site and rebuilt the internal link map. 584 links placed, 139 pages it refused to link because nothing honestly fit. total cost $0.21. Claude Opus 5, same 586 pages, same clock, got through 21 of them and spent $1.43. per page that is ~190x cheaper. the full Opus pass would have run $43. internal linking is the perfect Jev job. it is not writing, it is 8,790 yes/no calls: does this page have a real reason to link to that one, and is there anchor text already sitting in the copy. that is a classification problem, and we have been paying frontier prices to do it one page at a time. what you are watching: left column is Jev, right is Opus, same queue, same rubric. the run stops the moment Jev finishes so Opus stops burning tokens. coming soon to Distribb + connector + gpt plugin

borja

728,475 次观看 • 2 天前

New art project: the concept is to carve an image into wood in a semi-abstract form that allows the viewer to both recognize and personalize the image. The image is carved as an array of precisely cut dimples in a piece of pale wood pre-coated with black paint. 1/7

New art project: the concept is to carve an image into wood in a semi-abstract form that allows the viewer to both recognize and personalize the image. The image is carved as an array of precisely cut dimples in a piece of pale wood pre-coated with black paint. 1/7

David R. Liu

85,057 次观看 • 2 年前

Jev is actually insane. We benchmarked it, and the results completely change the game for us: > 500 real-time agents > running in parallel > in a 3D environment The preliminary results are crazy: > 500ms average latency > 35 API calls/s > all with a naive implementation We did 0 optimizations! The bottleneck is not Intelligence latency anymore. It's the first System 1 LLM. Crazy times.

Jev is actually insane. We benchmarked it, and the results completely change the game for us: > 500 real-time agents > running in parallel > in a 3D environment The preliminary results are crazy: > 500ms average latency > 35 API calls/s > all with a naive implementation We did 0 optimizations! The bottleneck is not Intelligence latency anymore. It's the first System 1 LLM. Crazy times.

Cris Lenta

58,675 次观看 • 3 天前

Wow, TypeSafe AI Jev is a game changer for voice-driven UI. Responsiveness really matters for an experience to 'feel' right, and this certainly does the job! Latency here is not optimal given I'm in London and calling out to us-west. But still, super snappy. In this video, Jamcat is using Pipecat to orchestrate a real-time handover between a command agent (Jev) that drives the UI, and voice agent (PhoneLLM) for handling generations and (not in the video) discussing ideas and session setup with the user.

Wow, TypeSafe AI Jev is a game changer for voice-driven UI. Responsiveness really matters for an experience to 'feel' right, and this certainly does the job! Latency here is not optimal given I'm in London and calling out to us-west. But still, super snappy. In this video, Jamcat is using Pipecat to orchestrate a real-time handover between a command agent (Jev) that drives the UI, and voice agent (PhoneLLM) for handling generations and (not in the video) discussing ideas and session setup with the user.

Jon Taylor

43,880 次观看 • 3 天前

Okay so Jev can actually do computer use really well Without any screenshots, or LLMs and no Pixels leave my mac I dont even read the Dom elements A local CoreML model segments every button and UI element on screen. On-device OCR reads the labels. That text is all Jev gets. It returns a probability across those elements and tells me the best one to click. Then it clicks, re-runs detection, and decides again. In a loop until the goal is done. ~90ms per decision. Faster than any LLM computer use I've tried. Blazing fast computer use, without any latency TypeSafe AI is building something really interesting

Okay so Jev can actually do computer use really well Without any screenshots, or LLMs and no Pixels leave my mac I dont even read the Dom elements A local CoreML model segments every button and UI element on screen. On-device OCR reads the labels. That text is all Jev gets. It returns a probability across those elements and tells me the best one to click. Then it clicks, re-runs detection, and decides again. In a loop until the goal is done. ~90ms per decision. Faster than any LLM computer use I've tried. Blazing fast computer use, without any latency TypeSafe AI is building something really interesting

Milind S

226,953 次观看 • 3 天前

What happens when you feed an AI images of every building in the United States? The model can take any blurry image and tell you exactly where that image was taken. GeoSpy AI (now Raven) is wild

What happens when you feed an AI images of every building in the United States? The model can take any blurry image and tell you exactly where that image was taken. GeoSpy AI (now Raven) is wild

Daniel Heinen

146,195 次观看 • 4 个月前

Introducing the Papers with Code MCP server! To celebrate its release, I've asked Claude Code to research the architecture of Jev by TypeSafe AI using the `search_papers` tool. Here's what it came up with: "If Jev is architecturally anything public, it's a large schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder with parallel label-query heads (GLiNER/ML-Decoder shape) trained with a proper-scoring-rule RL objective (RLCR shape), scaled far past the ~150M-param range those papers operate in — "neither small nor an LLM" fits that. The 40–200× speedup is consistent with removing autoregression, not with any exotic mechanism."

Introducing the Papers with Code MCP server! To celebrate its release, I've asked Claude Code to research the architecture of Jev by TypeSafe AI using the `search_papers` tool. Here's what it came up with: "If Jev is architecturally anything public, it's a large schema-conditioned bidirectional encoder with parallel label-query heads (GLiNER/ML-Decoder shape) trained with a proper-scoring-rule RL objective (RLCR shape), scaled far past the ~150M-param range those papers operate in — "neither small nor an LLM" fits that. The 40–200× speedup is consistent with removing autoregression, not with any exotic mechanism."

Niels Rogge

19,452 次观看 • 3 天前

The new DC Office in Jorhat is a step towards decolonising our institutions and building them in the image of a confident new Assam.

The new DC Office in Jorhat is a step towards decolonising our institutions and building them in the image of a confident new Assam.

Himanta Biswa Sarma

18,859 次观看 • 7 天前