Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

ICON has unveiled a next-generation construction 3D printer that improves on older gantry systems. It moves on tracks between sites, reducing setup time and labor. With a 70-foot print radius, it can build multi-story structures up to 27 feet tall and 110 feet long faster and more affordably.

341,717 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

Mimi Redfoot's profile picture
Mimi Redfoot6 months ago

Does it only build ugly garbage to kill the human spirit?

Alan McCright 🇺🇸's profile picture
Alan McCright 🇺🇸6 months ago

Build one of these instead of that 1960's Planet of the Apes sci-fi crap, and you'll have my attention, @ICON3DTech.

Court Reinland's profile picture
Court Reinland6 months ago

@bennash This is neat and all but can we get like a regular shaped house with square walls and a smooth finish?

Travis Hackney's profile picture
Travis Hackney6 months ago

That shit looks like Buu’s house

General Plebian's profile picture
General Plebian6 months ago

It's a neat idea. That building doesn't look very useful. None of these videos show what it looks like finished.

FadedArchives's profile picture
FadedArchives6 months ago

I heard the downside of these buildings is the cracks that form later.

Rami The Paladin's profile picture
Rami The Paladin6 months ago

So I was read that buildings created using this printing tech are already showing signs of cracking. Not even 3 years old. Would you trust your life to one of these machines?

Thomas D.'s profile picture
Thomas D.6 months ago

I’m all about mass production and reducing cost BUT you would have to pay me $$$ to live in a house that looks like this. Technology has a long way to go…

Barrak's profile picture
Barrak6 months ago

A printer that moves between sites and builds 27-story-tall structures is basically the future of construction arriving quietly on tracks.

Get Lost's profile picture
Get Lost6 months ago

time to replace a leaky pipe...

DrJackHughes's profile picture
DrJackHughes6 months ago

When I look at this I think about wiring, plumbing, and HVAC. Also, how do you put a roof on a wavy walled structure like those in the video? It seems to me you would have to build walls inside of the concrete walls to house electrical, plumbing, and HVAC. Then drywall, paint, trim. Sounds like it would cost almost twice as much. With brick veneer, you tie the brick veneer to the framed structure so they are attached. I guess it would be cheaper if you didn't want any utilities and wanted the concrete to be the final finish.

Thunder🫧's profile picture
Thunder🫧6 months ago

Ai and automation built homes using weatherproof, durable materials at very low cost could create beautiful low cost futuristic homes.

Nword Scissorhands's profile picture
Nword Scissorhands6 months ago

I've always wanted to live in a hornet's nest.

Kumar🇺🇸's profile picture
Kumar🇺🇸6 months ago

@RealPratikS does this solve any of the actual bottlenecks in housing on the COGS side?

Dave's profile picture
Dave6 months ago

yea i cant wait until we actually need oddly shaped buildings with no utility

Isaac 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️🏁's profile picture
Isaac 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️🏁6 months ago

This will be my slave quarters

Sidetracked's profile picture
Sidetracked6 months ago

If you want to live in a concrete intestine, then this is for you.

CryptoGeezuus's profile picture
CryptoGeezuus6 months ago

I don’t see any rebar? Is that an issue?

SiuMoi's profile picture
SiuMoi6 months ago

OMFG YES!!!! I wants it!

Andre William Duval's profile picture
Andre William Duval6 months ago

Two questions: How long does it take in real time? Who'd want to live in one?

Mike Legue's profile picture
Mike Legue6 months ago

Those layer lines look pretty good. How does it achieve the accuracy with that long boom length ?

Buzz of Kerbalborea (ksp arc)'s profile picture
Buzz of Kerbalborea (ksp arc)6 months ago

Give me one of these and I will create cathedrals and palaces that rival those of old.

Alteran Scientist Justin's profile picture
Alteran Scientist Justin6 months ago

@NASAAdmin @rookisaacman PRINT MOONBASE?

Big 𝕏 Brother's profile picture
Big 𝕏 Brother6 months ago

Have they solved the drying, contraction and cracking problems?

Renaissance Anon's profile picture
Renaissance Anon6 months ago

Watxh the resurgence of home courtyards just because this thing will be building from the centre lol

gravimetric, probably's profile picture
gravimetric, probably6 months ago

@grok respectfully, where the fck is this

Art Autonomy's profile picture
Art Autonomy6 months ago

They had this style of construction before the 21st century

Tim ⇤ 2m ⇥ Deyzel 💉x8 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇨🇳 🇫🇷 🇨🇦's profile picture
Tim ⇤ 2m ⇥ Deyzel 💉x8 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇨🇳 🇫🇷 🇨🇦6 months ago

The results look like shit. Given the high carbon footprint of concrete/cement perhaps design more eco-friendly structures. Rammed earth walls would be a good start

BarefootJoey 👣's profile picture
BarefootJoey 👣6 months ago

How its going vs how it started:

James's profile picture
James6 months ago

Always saying more affordable but reality is not only the technology costs more but the end product as well…this tech is always doing the opposite of what it claims

sandu baciu's profile picture
sandu baciu6 months ago

Makes absolutely perfect sense, use a crabe base with fast setup time rather than the gantry type frame that is far more complex. Nevertheless, if the material is sourced locally, even dirt like Wasp is doing, the cost for homes can drop significantly 👍🙏

TrickyNixon's profile picture
TrickyNixon6 months ago

Amazing! Modern construction is disposable, moldy, overpriced trash. Printed concrete shells could last centuries. Far stronger, water tight, no mold or rot, earthquake resistant.

Twit1971's profile picture
Twit19716 months ago

What does the finished product look like? I don’t wanna live in a beehive

Dale's profile picture
Dale6 months ago

$HGRAF. They should be in talks with Hydrograph.

Related Videos