Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ICON has unveiled a next-generation construction 3D printer that improves on older gantry systems. It moves on tracks between sites, reducing setup time and labor. With a 70-foot print radius, it can build multi-story structures up to 27 feet tall and 110 feet long faster and more affordably.

341,717 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля Mimi Redfoot
Mimi Redfoot6 месяцев назад

Does it only build ugly garbage to kill the human spirit?

Фото профиля Alan McCright 🇺🇸
Alan McCright 🇺🇸6 месяцев назад

Build one of these instead of that 1960's Planet of the Apes sci-fi crap, and you'll have my attention, @ICON3DTech.

Фото профиля Court Reinland
Court Reinland6 месяцев назад

@bennash This is neat and all but can we get like a regular shaped house with square walls and a smooth finish?

Фото профиля Travis Hackney
Travis Hackney6 месяцев назад

That shit looks like Buu’s house

Фото профиля General Plebian
General Plebian6 месяцев назад

It's a neat idea. That building doesn't look very useful. None of these videos show what it looks like finished.

Фото профиля FadedArchives
FadedArchives6 месяцев назад

I heard the downside of these buildings is the cracks that form later.

Фото профиля Rami The Paladin
Rami The Paladin6 месяцев назад

So I was read that buildings created using this printing tech are already showing signs of cracking. Not even 3 years old. Would you trust your life to one of these machines?

Фото профиля Thomas D.
Thomas D.6 месяцев назад

I’m all about mass production and reducing cost BUT you would have to pay me $$$ to live in a house that looks like this. Technology has a long way to go…

Фото профиля Barrak
Barrak6 месяцев назад

A printer that moves between sites and builds 27-story-tall structures is basically the future of construction arriving quietly on tracks.

Фото профиля Get Lost
Get Lost6 месяцев назад

time to replace a leaky pipe...

Фото профиля DrJackHughes
DrJackHughes6 месяцев назад

When I look at this I think about wiring, plumbing, and HVAC. Also, how do you put a roof on a wavy walled structure like those in the video? It seems to me you would have to build walls inside of the concrete walls to house electrical, plumbing, and HVAC. Then drywall, paint, trim. Sounds like it would cost almost twice as much. With brick veneer, you tie the brick veneer to the framed structure so they are attached. I guess it would be cheaper if you didn't want any utilities and wanted the concrete to be the final finish.

Фото профиля Thunder🫧
Thunder🫧6 месяцев назад

Ai and automation built homes using weatherproof, durable materials at very low cost could create beautiful low cost futuristic homes.

Фото профиля Nword Scissorhands
Nword Scissorhands6 месяцев назад

I've always wanted to live in a hornet's nest.

Фото профиля Kumar🇺🇸
Kumar🇺🇸6 месяцев назад

@RealPratikS does this solve any of the actual bottlenecks in housing on the COGS side?

Фото профиля Dave
Dave6 месяцев назад

yea i cant wait until we actually need oddly shaped buildings with no utility

Фото профиля Isaac 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️🏁
Isaac 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️🏁6 месяцев назад

This will be my slave quarters

Фото профиля Sidetracked
Sidetracked6 месяцев назад

If you want to live in a concrete intestine, then this is for you.

Фото профиля CryptoGeezuus
CryptoGeezuus6 месяцев назад

I don’t see any rebar? Is that an issue?

Фото профиля SiuMoi
SiuMoi6 месяцев назад

OMFG YES!!!! I wants it!

Фото профиля Andre William Duval
Andre William Duval6 месяцев назад

Two questions: How long does it take in real time? Who'd want to live in one?

Фото профиля Mike Legue
Mike Legue6 месяцев назад

Those layer lines look pretty good. How does it achieve the accuracy with that long boom length ?

Фото профиля Buzz of Kerbalborea (ksp arc)
Buzz of Kerbalborea (ksp arc)6 месяцев назад

Give me one of these and I will create cathedrals and palaces that rival those of old.

Фото профиля Alteran Scientist Justin
Alteran Scientist Justin6 месяцев назад

@NASAAdmin @rookisaacman PRINT MOONBASE?

Фото профиля Big 𝕏 Brother
Big 𝕏 Brother6 месяцев назад

Have they solved the drying, contraction and cracking problems?

Фото профиля Renaissance Anon
Renaissance Anon6 месяцев назад

Watxh the resurgence of home courtyards just because this thing will be building from the centre lol

Фото профиля gravimetric, probably
gravimetric, probably6 месяцев назад

@grok respectfully, where the fck is this

Фото профиля Art Autonomy
Art Autonomy6 месяцев назад

They had this style of construction before the 21st century

Фото профиля Tim ⇤ 2m ⇥ Deyzel 💉x8 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇨🇳 🇫🇷 🇨🇦
Tim ⇤ 2m ⇥ Deyzel 💉x8 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 🇨🇳 🇫🇷 🇨🇦6 месяцев назад

The results look like shit. Given the high carbon footprint of concrete/cement perhaps design more eco-friendly structures. Rammed earth walls would be a good start

Фото профиля BarefootJoey 👣
BarefootJoey 👣6 месяцев назад

How its going vs how it started:

Фото профиля James
James6 месяцев назад

Always saying more affordable but reality is not only the technology costs more but the end product as well…this tech is always doing the opposite of what it claims

Фото профиля sandu baciu
sandu baciu6 месяцев назад

Makes absolutely perfect sense, use a crabe base with fast setup time rather than the gantry type frame that is far more complex. Nevertheless, if the material is sourced locally, even dirt like Wasp is doing, the cost for homes can drop significantly 👍🙏

Фото профиля TrickyNixon
TrickyNixon6 месяцев назад

Amazing! Modern construction is disposable, moldy, overpriced trash. Printed concrete shells could last centuries. Far stronger, water tight, no mold or rot, earthquake resistant.

Фото профиля Twit1971
Twit19716 месяцев назад

What does the finished product look like? I don’t wanna live in a beehive

Фото профиля Dale
Dale6 месяцев назад

$HGRAF. They should be in talks with Hydrograph.

Похожие видео