正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
If a result falls below the quality floor, you don’t pay for it. Corent should only bill for outputs that actually meet the execution standard. Bad output shouldn’t become the client's problem.
15,534 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)
28 条评论

Couldn't agree more. Corent setting a quality floor protects the client's investment.

That’s it

Quality first, payment second. Simple and fair 🔥

If it doesn’t meet the standard, it shouldn’t cost you

This is how execution-based pricing should work

Now that’s accountability

This is the standard. 🔥

Client-first mindset

No excuses, just results

Finally, a quality-first approach

Spot on. Clients should only pay for outputs that actually deliver value.

No passing bad outputs onto the client. Big win

Exactly. You shouldn't have to foot the bill for standard-failing results.

Exactly how it should be

Love the idea of paying for outcomes, not excuses

Love this guarantee

100% agree. Quality assurance should be the provider's responsibility, not the client's.

Simple and fair

💯👏

Pay for quality. That’s the standard 🚀

This changes the game

Aligning payment directly with execution quality is how trust is built.

Results should speak for themselves

Accountability built directly into the model

Quality over everything

That’s a strong promise

Finally a fair deal in crypto.

Absolutely right—bad outputs should never be billed to the end user.
相关视频
Sensitive content
Sorry, men. If you don’t reflexively pay for the bill without looking, it’s a red flag that you’re cheap even if you pay for it.
Ian Miles
818,957 次观看 • 2 年前

