Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

If #Bitcoin goes to zero when the founder shows up, why didn't Apple collapse when Steve Jobs died ? That's the whole point of a decentralized system: it doesn't need its founder. Does Dan Pena not know this, or is he just farming clicks ? If Satoshi came back,... show more

ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ xʟᴀʀɢᴇ

45,903 subscribers

30,750 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Finance #Bitcoin

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Jordan Nel explains why founder taste matters when evaluating a GP. “Sometimes if somebody says, ‘This is the best founder I’ve met this year,’ that’s a ton of signal and you just back up the truck. But knowing when it’s signal and when it’s not is hard.”

Jordan Nel explains why founder taste matters when evaluating a GP. “Sometimes if somebody says, ‘This is the best founder I’ve met this year,’ that’s a ton of signal and you just back up the truck. But knowing when it’s signal and when it’s not is hard.”

Delphi Digital

39,950 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️- If you knew who was really behind Bitcoin and i know a 100% who it is, you wouldnt be able to sleep at night, you would run as fast as you could to sell it. And when the real founder of Bitcoin comes out, it would go to fkn zero - Dan Pena, American Businessman and Financial analyst.

🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️- If you knew who was really behind Bitcoin and i know a 100% who it is, you wouldnt be able to sleep at night, you would run as fast as you could to sell it. And when the real founder of Bitcoin comes out, it would go to fkn zero - Dan Pena, American Businessman and Financial analyst.

Monitor𝕏

11,737 views • 6 months ago

CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?! In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary Binance founder CZ 🔶 BNB suggested something big. He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen. He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.

CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?! In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary Binance founder CZ 🔶 BNB suggested something big. He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen. He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.

BSCN

80,161 views • 2 months ago

Awkward. There's a reason Pomp acts like he doesn't hear what is said. The question is not who Satoshi is. It's why do the Bitcoin Maxis do not want to know when they are given video evidence that Homeland Security met with the FOUR Satoshis. They either know or they don't want to know. If they know it's the biggest financial lie in history. If they don't know it's a dangerous willful ignorance of something that could harm the investment itself. IT WAS NEVER BITCOIN.

Awkward. There's a reason Pomp acts like he doesn't hear what is said. The question is not who Satoshi is. It's why do the Bitcoin Maxis do not want to know when they are given video evidence that Homeland Security met with the FOUR Satoshis. They either know or they don't want to know. If they know it's the biggest financial lie in history. If they don't know it's a dangerous willful ignorance of something that could harm the investment itself. IT WAS NEVER BITCOIN.

Digital Asset Investor

167,336 views • 3 years ago

Dan the Dodger still can't tell us whether what his shaykh says in this video is shirk akbar or not. He wants to debate or discuss something when he doesn't even know if this is shirk or not. You're a complete joke 🤡

Dan the Dodger still can't tell us whether what his shaykh says in this video is shirk akbar or not. He wants to debate or discuss something when he doesn't even know if this is shirk or not. You're a complete joke 🤡

Jake Brancatella

13,938 views • 1 year ago

Marc Andreessen’s 2 reasons for why founder-run companies are harder to disrupt “If you just look historically at many of the important technology companies of the last 50-100 years, many of them are run by their founders for decades… And a lot of it has to do with disruption.” Marc continues: “There’s this cliché of founders that a lot of people believe which is that founders are too stubborn and founders get too locked into their original idea and they can’t adapt as times change. We’ve actually found the opposite to be true. We’ve found that when a company is going to get disrupted, the person in many cases with the best odds of countering the disruption is the founder, and I think there’s a couple of different reasons for that.” The two reasons Marc shares are: 1. The founder remembers when the business was nothing, and are constantly haunted by the fact that the business could be a zero again: “The founder remembers what it was like when there was nobody else in the office with you and when you carried out your own trash can. The founder remembers this thing used to be zero.” 2. The founder carries enormous moral weight inside the company and can more easily make drastic changes: “When Steve Jobs goes into Apple and says times are changing we need to do X - and X is heresy… A Steve jobs - a founder - is going to be able to convince the company that they have to do that. Whereas if a professional CEO shows up and says that, everybody’s going to be like, ‘Ooh, I don’t know.’” Source: Startup Grind (Feb 2016)

Marc Andreessen’s 2 reasons for why founder-run companies are harder to disrupt “If you just look historically at many of the important technology companies of the last 50-100 years, many of them are run by their founders for decades… And a lot of it has to do with disruption.” Marc continues: “There’s this cliché of founders that a lot of people believe which is that founders are too stubborn and founders get too locked into their original idea and they can’t adapt as times change. We’ve actually found the opposite to be true. We’ve found that when a company is going to get disrupted, the person in many cases with the best odds of countering the disruption is the founder, and I think there’s a couple of different reasons for that.” The two reasons Marc shares are: 1. The founder remembers when the business was nothing, and are constantly haunted by the fact that the business could be a zero again: “The founder remembers what it was like when there was nobody else in the office with you and when you carried out your own trash can. The founder remembers this thing used to be zero.” 2. The founder carries enormous moral weight inside the company and can more easily make drastic changes: “When Steve Jobs goes into Apple and says times are changing we need to do X - and X is heresy… A Steve jobs - a founder - is going to be able to convince the company that they have to do that. Whereas if a professional CEO shows up and says that, everybody’s going to be like, ‘Ooh, I don’t know.’” Source: Startup Grind (Feb 2016)

Startup Archive

19,427 views • 27 days ago

Do you have 300,000 #Bitcoin? You do realise at $100,000 BTC that's $30B, right? Richard Heart is the best founder, PERIOD! He is a self made billionaire, with a war chest unmatchable in this space. The #PulseChain war chest has 171,000 #ETH, what do you think happens next? Our founder doesn't need to dump on our heads, this is the magic carpet ride. Question is, are you on it? $HEX

Do you have 300,000 #Bitcoin? You do realise at $100,000 BTC that's $30B, right? Richard Heart is the best founder, PERIOD! He is a self made billionaire, with a war chest unmatchable in this space. The #PulseChain war chest has 171,000 #ETH, what do you think happens next? Our founder doesn't need to dump on our heads, this is the magic carpet ride. Question is, are you on it? $HEX

KatieePCrypto.pls

32,418 views • 1 year ago

Cohort retention is the one thing to know if what you made is good or not This is what it looks like when it is good

Cohort retention is the one thing to know if what you made is good or not This is what it looks like when it is good

Garry Tan

142,136 views • 2 years ago

Adam Sosnick Doesn't Know What 'First' Means One of most brilliant podcast sidekicks of our time, Adam 🆘 Sosnick pretends to not understand the concept of putting our nation and our people First. Nobody is suggesting he doesn't love both nations, what we are saying is just that he doesn't prioritize OURS. The whole point is that when we are debating topics that relate to the well-being of our own people, our own land, we do not prioritize the same things. That's the whole point.

Adam Sosnick Doesn't Know What 'First' Means One of most brilliant podcast sidekicks of our time, Adam 🆘 Sosnick pretends to not understand the concept of putting our nation and our people First. Nobody is suggesting he doesn't love both nations, what we are saying is just that he doesn't prioritize OURS. The whole point is that when we are debating topics that relate to the well-being of our own people, our own land, we do not prioritize the same things. That's the whole point.

Bobby Sauce

40,300 views • 5 months ago

🚨ELON MUSK: "As we dug into USAID it became apparent that what we have here is not an apple with a worm in it, but we have actually just a ball of worms. If you have an apple with a worm in it, you can take the worm out. If you have a whole ball of worms, it's hopeless. USAID is a ball of worms. There is no apple. And when there is no apple you just need to get rid of the whole thing. That's why it's got to go. It's beyond repair."

🚨ELON MUSK: "As we dug into USAID it became apparent that what we have here is not an apple with a worm in it, but we have actually just a ball of worms. If you have an apple with a worm in it, you can take the worm out. If you have a whole ball of worms, it's hopeless. USAID is a ball of worms. There is no apple. And when there is no apple you just need to get rid of the whole thing. That's why it's got to go. It's beyond repair."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,541,392 views • 1 year ago

Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of the greatest money laundering operation in human history, Climate Change. Wall Street Financial Analyst Dan Pena: “It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.” Question: “What are we going to do when our ocean level rises?” Dan Pena “If that were really true, would you believe? If the water on the planet is going to rise up 10 feet, that means the southern part of the United States is gone. England is gone. The banks of this world know it's not going to happen. If it were really true, the banks wouldn't invest. The banks wouldn't finance. You know those 30, 40-year mortgages? The world will be over by then. Is Barclays Bank gonna give you a motherf*****g loan? Greatest respect, ma'am. It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.”

Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of the greatest money laundering operation in human history, Climate Change. Wall Street Financial Analyst Dan Pena: “It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.” Question: “What are we going to do when our ocean level rises?” Dan Pena “If that were really true, would you believe? If the water on the planet is going to rise up 10 feet, that means the southern part of the United States is gone. England is gone. The banks of this world know it's not going to happen. If it were really true, the banks wouldn't invest. The banks wouldn't finance. You know those 30, 40-year mortgages? The world will be over by then. Is Barclays Bank gonna give you a motherf*****g loan? Greatest respect, ma'am. It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

11,801 views • 8 months ago

Ivan on Tech won't touch $MSTR. Why? He doesn't understand Saylor's "Bitcoin yield" concept. Bitcoin has no yield -ETH does, Solana does, but not Bitcoin. The rocket diagrams, the complex debt instruments - it all makes him uneasy. He'd rather just stack BTC. Ivan is a simple man

Ivan on Tech won't touch $MSTR. Why? He doesn't understand Saylor's "Bitcoin yield" concept. Bitcoin has no yield -ETH does, Solana does, but not Bitcoin. The rocket diagrams, the complex debt instruments - it all makes him uneasy. He'd rather just stack BTC. Ivan is a simple man

Ivan on Tech 🍳📈💰 Head Trader @ Bullmania

18,024 views • 7 months ago

Dr Oz: "This is corruption on the underlying system ... when everyone is doing it, that's a real pathology. Because if you're not part of the corrupt system, you're a fool. When I'm lying to you and you know I'm lying to you and I know that you know that I'm lying to you, and on and on and on, that's how countries collapse."

Dr Oz: "This is corruption on the underlying system ... when everyone is doing it, that's a real pathology. Because if you're not part of the corrupt system, you're a fool. When I'm lying to you and you know I'm lying to you and I know that you know that I'm lying to you, and on and on and on, that's how countries collapse."

Aaron Rupar

140,625 views • 29 days ago

"when the galaxy movie leaked back on the 10th of april, not even kidding, this is the first thing i decied to do when it leaked"

"when the galaxy movie leaked back on the 10th of april, not even kidding, this is the first thing i decied to do when it leaked"

mariotwt confessions

32,024 views • 2 months ago

Arthur Hayes says MicroStrategy is irrelevant now, just buy $IBIT or another bitcoin:native ETF "MicroStrategy was relevant for a hot second, whenever it was freaked out that Bitcoin might go to like 20,000 or whatever. But if we're in this period of money printing and soft yield curve control, MicroStrategy is irrelevant. What he does doesn't matter" "At the end of the day, if I'm an investor getting back into Bitcoin and I have to invest through a stock market, just buy IBIT or one of these other Bitcoin ETFs. Don't buy MicroStrategy, it makes absolutely no sense" "If you want to gamble, cool, that's a thing. But the institutional bid for crypto exposure through a stock market will not go through MicroStrategy" "And if that stock does not trade at a premium to mNAV, the whole thing breaks down. Then what's the point?"

Arthur Hayes says MicroStrategy is irrelevant now, just buy $IBIT or another bitcoin:native ETF "MicroStrategy was relevant for a hot second, whenever it was freaked out that Bitcoin might go to like 20,000 or whatever. But if we're in this period of money printing and soft yield curve control, MicroStrategy is irrelevant. What he does doesn't matter" "At the end of the day, if I'm an investor getting back into Bitcoin and I have to invest through a stock market, just buy IBIT or one of these other Bitcoin ETFs. Don't buy MicroStrategy, it makes absolutely no sense" "If you want to gamble, cool, that's a thing. But the institutional bid for crypto exposure through a stock market will not go through MicroStrategy" "And if that stock does not trade at a premium to mNAV, the whole thing breaks down. Then what's the point?"

Laura Shin

27,271 views • 13 days ago

MICHAEL SAYLOR REVEALED HIS LIFE MISSION IS TO HAVE HIS OVER 17,000 #BITCOIN DESTROYED WHEN HE PASSES AWAY "IF YOU ACCUMULATE A LOT OF WEALTH IN BTC AND BURN THE KEYS WHEN YOU LEAVE, YOU’RE MAKING A CONTRIBUTION TO EVERYONE WHO OWNS IT" "SUPPORTING BTC AS A PROTOCOL FOR PROSPERITY IS JUST A GREAT THING TO DO" "I HOPE I'M KNOWN FOR HAVING TAKEN THE TORCH FROM SATOSHI" LEGEND 🔥

MICHAEL SAYLOR REVEALED HIS LIFE MISSION IS TO HAVE HIS OVER 17,000 #BITCOIN DESTROYED WHEN HE PASSES AWAY "IF YOU ACCUMULATE A LOT OF WEALTH IN BTC AND BURN THE KEYS WHEN YOU LEAVE, YOU’RE MAKING A CONTRIBUTION TO EVERYONE WHO OWNS IT" "SUPPORTING BTC AS A PROTOCOL FOR PROSPERITY IS JUST A GREAT THING TO DO" "I HOPE I'M KNOWN FOR HAVING TAKEN THE TORCH FROM SATOSHI" LEGEND 🔥

The Bitcoin Historian

102,484 views • 2 months ago

"Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” - Prof Jiang That single question from Jiang shows the misunderstanding immediately. Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers, Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control, plus the mining system on top of it to protect it with energy. When someone frames Bitcoin like a centralized system, they are not critiquing Bitcoin as it is. They are critiquing a version of Bitcoin that exists only in their own confusion.

"Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” - Prof Jiang That single question from Jiang shows the misunderstanding immediately. Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers, Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control, plus the mining system on top of it to protect it with energy. When someone frames Bitcoin like a centralized system, they are not critiquing Bitcoin as it is. They are critiquing a version of Bitcoin that exists only in their own confusion.

MDB

579,648 views • 4 months ago

Steve Jobs on getting fired from Apple Asked what his greatest weakness is, Steve Jobs replies: “I think all of us need to be on guard against arrogance, which knocks at the door whenever you’re successful.” Steve reflects on what many have called his “wilderness years” — the 12 year period between when he was fired at Apple and eventually came back to save it from the verge of bankruptcy: “I was basically fired from Apple when I was 30 and invited to come back 12 years later. That was difficult when it happened but maybe the best thing that ever happened to me.” If Steve wasn’t fired, there would be no Pixar. And as Brent Schlender (author of Becoming Steve Jobs) argues, there might not have been an Apple either — or at least not the Apple we know today: “This middle period was the most pivotal of his life. And perhaps the happiest… He finally settled down, married, and had a family. He learned the value of patience and the ability to feign it when he lost it. Most important, his work with the two companies he led during that time, NeXT and Pixar, turned him into the kind of man, and leader, who would spur Apple to unimaginable heights upon his return.”

Steve Jobs on getting fired from Apple Asked what his greatest weakness is, Steve Jobs replies: “I think all of us need to be on guard against arrogance, which knocks at the door whenever you’re successful.” Steve reflects on what many have called his “wilderness years” — the 12 year period between when he was fired at Apple and eventually came back to save it from the verge of bankruptcy: “I was basically fired from Apple when I was 30 and invited to come back 12 years later. That was difficult when it happened but maybe the best thing that ever happened to me.” If Steve wasn’t fired, there would be no Pixar. And as Brent Schlender (author of Becoming Steve Jobs) argues, there might not have been an Apple either — or at least not the Apple we know today: “This middle period was the most pivotal of his life. And perhaps the happiest… He finally settled down, married, and had a family. He learned the value of patience and the ability to feign it when he lost it. Most important, his work with the two companies he led during that time, NeXT and Pixar, turned him into the kind of man, and leader, who would spur Apple to unimaginable heights upon his return.”

Startup Archive

35,717 views • 7 months ago