Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

If #Bitcoin goes to zero when the founder shows up, why didn't Apple collapse when Steve Jobs died ? That's the whole point of a decentralized system: it doesn't need its founder. Does Dan Pena not know this, or is he just farming clicks ? If Satoshi came back,...

cryptoxlarg's profile picture

ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ xʟᴀʀɢᴇ

45,903 subscribers

30,750 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Finans#Bitcoin
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️- If you knew who was really behind Bitcoin and i know a 100% who it is, you wouldnt be able to sleep at night, you would run as fast as you could to sell it. And when the real founder of Bitcoin comes out, it would go to fkn zero - Dan Pena, American Businessman and Financial analyst.
0:50

🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️- If you knew who was really behind Bitcoin and i know a 100% who it is, you wouldnt be able to sleep at night, you would run as fast as you could to sell it. And when the real founder of Bitcoin comes out, it would go to fkn zero - Dan Pena, American Businessman and Financial analyst.

Monitor𝕏

11,737 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?! In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary Binance founder CZ 🔶 BNB suggested something big. He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen. He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.
0:20

CZ wants to freeze Satoshi's $BTC ...?! In an interview clip shared by Coin Bureau, the legendary Binance founder CZ 🔶 BNB suggested something big. He suggested that the Bitcoin community should give a timeline (for instance 6 months), and if Satoshi does not move their $BTC, the relevant addresses should be frozen. He says that, if it is not frozen, it is only a matter of time before it is hacked.

BSCN

80,022 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

“It literally doesn’t matter to the business of this whether ANYONE is watching it when it’s televised…It doesn’t matter if you watch or not, the business does not need your eyeballs.” — Dan explains why the business of the NBA is booming despite low TV ratings. Watch:
3:55

“It literally doesn’t matter to the business of this whether ANYONE is watching it when it’s televised…It doesn’t matter if you watch or not, the business does not need your eyeballs.” — Dan explains why the business of the NBA is booming despite low TV ratings. Watch:

Dan Le Batard Show with Stugotz

40,941 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dan the Dodger still can't tell us whether what his shaykh says in this video is shirk akbar or not. He wants to debate or discuss something when he doesn't even know if this is shirk or not. You're a complete joke 🤡
6:33

Dan the Dodger still can't tell us whether what his shaykh says in this video is shirk akbar or not. He wants to debate or discuss something when he doesn't even know if this is shirk or not. You're a complete joke 🤡

Jake Brancatella

13,938 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Do you have 300,000 #Bitcoin? You do realise at $100,000 BTC that's $30B, right? Richard Heart is the best founder, PERIOD! He is a self made billionaire, with a war chest unmatchable in this space. The #PulseChain war chest has 171,000 #ETH, what do you think happens next? Our founder doesn't need to dump on our heads, this is the magic carpet ride. Question is, are you on it? $HEX
0:31

Do you have 300,000 #Bitcoin? You do realise at $100,000 BTC that's $30B, right? Richard Heart is the best founder, PERIOD! He is a self made billionaire, with a war chest unmatchable in this space. The #PulseChain war chest has 171,000 #ETH, what do you think happens next? Our founder doesn't need to dump on our heads, this is the magic carpet ride. Question is, are you on it? $HEX

KatieePCrypto.pls

32,320 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Cohort retention is the one thing to know if what you made is good or not This is what it looks like when it is good
1:44

Cohort retention is the one thing to know if what you made is good or not This is what it looks like when it is good

Garry Tan

142,136 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Adam Sosnick Doesn't Know What 'First' Means One of most brilliant podcast sidekicks of our time, Adam 🆘 Sosnick pretends to not understand the concept of putting our nation and our people First. Nobody is suggesting he doesn't love both nations, what we are saying is just that he doesn't prioritize OURS. The whole point is that when we are debating topics that relate to the well-being of our own people, our own land, we do not prioritize the same things. That's the whole point.
2:49

Adam Sosnick Doesn't Know What 'First' Means One of most brilliant podcast sidekicks of our time, Adam 🆘 Sosnick pretends to not understand the concept of putting our nation and our people First. Nobody is suggesting he doesn't love both nations, what we are saying is just that he doesn't prioritize OURS. The whole point is that when we are debating topics that relate to the well-being of our own people, our own land, we do not prioritize the same things. That's the whole point.

Bobby Sauce

40,300 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨ELON MUSK: "As we dug into USAID it became apparent that what we have here is not an apple with a worm in it, but we have actually just a ball of worms. If you have an apple with a worm in it, you can take the worm out. If you have a whole ball of worms, it's hopeless. USAID is a ball of worms. There is no apple. And when there is no apple you just need to get rid of the whole thing. That's why it's got to go. It's beyond repair."
0:39

🚨ELON MUSK: "As we dug into USAID it became apparent that what we have here is not an apple with a worm in it, but we have actually just a ball of worms. If you have an apple with a worm in it, you can take the worm out. If you have a whole ball of worms, it's hopeless. USAID is a ball of worms. There is no apple. And when there is no apple you just need to get rid of the whole thing. That's why it's got to go. It's beyond repair."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,539,400 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Ivan on Tech won't touch $MSTR. Why? He doesn't understand Saylor's "Bitcoin yield" concept. Bitcoin has no yield -ETH does, Solana does, but not Bitcoin. The rocket diagrams, the complex debt instruments - it all makes him uneasy. He'd rather just stack BTC. Ivan is a simple man
1:21

Ivan on Tech won't touch $MSTR. Why? He doesn't understand Saylor's "Bitcoin yield" concept. Bitcoin has no yield -ETH does, Solana does, but not Bitcoin. The rocket diagrams, the complex debt instruments - it all makes him uneasy. He'd rather just stack BTC. Ivan is a simple man

Ivan on Tech 🍳📈💰 Head Trader @ Bullmania

18,024 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of the greatest money laundering operation in human history, Climate Change. Wall Street Financial Analyst Dan Pena: “It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.” Question: “What are we going to do when our ocean level rises?” Dan Pena “If that were really true, would you believe? If the water on the planet is going to rise up 10 feet, that means the southern part of the United States is gone. England is gone. The banks of this world know it's not going to happen. If it were really true, the banks wouldn't invest. The banks wouldn't finance. You know those 30, 40-year mortgages? The world will be over by then. Is Barclays Bank gonna give you a motherf*****g loan? Greatest respect, ma'am. It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.”
0:38

Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of the greatest money laundering operation in human history, Climate Change. Wall Street Financial Analyst Dan Pena: “It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.” Question: “What are we going to do when our ocean level rises?” Dan Pena “If that were really true, would you believe? If the water on the planet is going to rise up 10 feet, that means the southern part of the United States is gone. England is gone. The banks of this world know it's not going to happen. If it were really true, the banks wouldn't invest. The banks wouldn't finance. You know those 30, 40-year mortgages? The world will be over by then. Is Barclays Bank gonna give you a motherf*****g loan? Greatest respect, ma'am. It's the greatest fraud that's been perpetrated on mankind this century.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

11,790 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

"when the galaxy movie leaked back on the 10th of april, not even kidding, this is the first thing i decied to do when it leaked"
1:38

"when the galaxy movie leaked back on the 10th of april, not even kidding, this is the first thing i decied to do when it leaked"

mariotwt confessions

31,889 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

when I talk about not having anywhere near enough time to keep up with the absolutely autistic amount of gossip/lies behind the scenes, this is what I’m talking about Not sure if the gossip itself is more pathetic, or the fact that people actually fall for it
0:34

when I talk about not having anywhere near enough time to keep up with the absolutely autistic amount of gossip/lies behind the scenes, this is what I’m talking about Not sure if the gossip itself is more pathetic, or the fact that people actually fall for it

Destiny | Steven Bonnell II

112,008 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

MICHAEL SAYLOR REVEALED HIS LIFE MISSION IS TO HAVE HIS OVER 17,000 #BITCOIN DESTROYED WHEN HE PASSES AWAY "IF YOU ACCUMULATE A LOT OF WEALTH IN BTC AND BURN THE KEYS WHEN YOU LEAVE, YOU’RE MAKING A CONTRIBUTION TO EVERYONE WHO OWNS IT" "SUPPORTING BTC AS A PROTOCOL FOR PROSPERITY IS JUST A GREAT THING TO DO" "I HOPE I'M KNOWN FOR HAVING TAKEN THE TORCH FROM SATOSHI" LEGEND 🔥
0:52

MICHAEL SAYLOR REVEALED HIS LIFE MISSION IS TO HAVE HIS OVER 17,000 #BITCOIN DESTROYED WHEN HE PASSES AWAY "IF YOU ACCUMULATE A LOT OF WEALTH IN BTC AND BURN THE KEYS WHEN YOU LEAVE, YOU’RE MAKING A CONTRIBUTION TO EVERYONE WHO OWNS IT" "SUPPORTING BTC AS A PROTOCOL FOR PROSPERITY IS JUST A GREAT THING TO DO" "I HOPE I'M KNOWN FOR HAVING TAKEN THE TORCH FROM SATOSHI" LEGEND 🔥

The Bitcoin Historian

101,948 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

"Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” - Prof Jiang That single question from Jiang shows the misunderstanding immediately. Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers, Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control, plus the mining system on top of it to protect it with energy. When someone frames Bitcoin like a centralized system, they are not critiquing Bitcoin as it is. They are critiquing a version of Bitcoin that exists only in their own confusion.
0:33

"Where are the servers of Bitcoin located?” - Prof Jiang That single question from Jiang shows the misunderstanding immediately. Bitcoin does not run on one company’s servers, Bitcoin runs on a distributed network of nodes spread across the world, which is exactly why it is hard to censor, shut down, or control, plus the mining system on top of it to protect it with energy. When someone frames Bitcoin like a centralized system, they are not critiquing Bitcoin as it is. They are critiquing a version of Bitcoin that exists only in their own confusion.

MDB

578,538 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Steve Jobs on getting fired from Apple Asked what his greatest weakness is, Steve Jobs replies: “I think all of us need to be on guard against arrogance, which knocks at the door whenever you’re successful.” Steve reflects on what many have called his “wilderness years” — the 12 year period between when he was fired at Apple and eventually came back to save it from the verge of bankruptcy: “I was basically fired from Apple when I was 30 and invited to come back 12 years later. That was difficult when it happened but maybe the best thing that ever happened to me.” If Steve wasn’t fired, there would be no Pixar. And as Brent Schlender (author of Becoming Steve Jobs) argues, there might not have been an Apple either — or at least not the Apple we know today: “This middle period was the most pivotal of his life. And perhaps the happiest… He finally settled down, married, and had a family. He learned the value of patience and the ability to feign it when he lost it. Most important, his work with the two companies he led during that time, NeXT and Pixar, turned him into the kind of man, and leader, who would spur Apple to unimaginable heights upon his return.”
1:28

Steve Jobs on getting fired from Apple Asked what his greatest weakness is, Steve Jobs replies: “I think all of us need to be on guard against arrogance, which knocks at the door whenever you’re successful.” Steve reflects on what many have called his “wilderness years” — the 12 year period between when he was fired at Apple and eventually came back to save it from the verge of bankruptcy: “I was basically fired from Apple when I was 30 and invited to come back 12 years later. That was difficult when it happened but maybe the best thing that ever happened to me.” If Steve wasn’t fired, there would be no Pixar. And as Brent Schlender (author of Becoming Steve Jobs) argues, there might not have been an Apple either — or at least not the Apple we know today: “This middle period was the most pivotal of his life. And perhaps the happiest… He finally settled down, married, and had a family. He learned the value of patience and the ability to feign it when he lost it. Most important, his work with the two companies he led during that time, NeXT and Pixar, turned him into the kind of man, and leader, who would spur Apple to unimaginable heights upon his return.”

Startup Archive

35,717 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

NEW: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales storms out of an interview after just 48 seconds when podcast host Tilo Jung asked him if he was "founder" or "co-founder." Wales: I'm Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia. Jung: You're the founder or co-founder? Wales: I don't care. It's the dumbest question in the world... It doesn't matter. Jung: Isn't that like, when it comes to Wikipedia, a problem? What are the facts? Wales: Well, it's not a fact, it's an opinion. Jung: But for you, you're the founder... Wales: Can I just say again, it doesn't matter. I've answered your question four times... You know what? I'm done. H/t: Champagne Joshi
1:36

NEW: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales storms out of an interview after just 48 seconds when podcast host Tilo Jung asked him if he was "founder" or "co-founder." Wales: I'm Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia. Jung: You're the founder or co-founder? Wales: I don't care. It's the dumbest question in the world... It doesn't matter. Jung: Isn't that like, when it comes to Wikipedia, a problem? What are the facts? Wales: Well, it's not a fact, it's an opinion. Jung: But for you, you're the founder... Wales: Can I just say again, it doesn't matter. I've answered your question four times... You know what? I'm done. H/t: Champagne Joshi

Collin Rugg

7,330,850 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Abby Phillip: “Here's the main issue. Is it legal… if there are survivors clinging to whatever, is it legal to then strike them again?” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “The question is not actually that… No, Abby. Is the whole thing hangs on whether the boat is still a military target or not?” “Because if it was a military target, there were people on it when they hit it the first time.” Abby Phillip: “The issue when it comes to the legality of the second strike, not the first one strike… It's what happens to survivors.” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “No, it's not, Abby. That's wrong... The question is not the existence of the survivors. It's whether the boat is still a legitimate military target.”
1:04

Abby Phillip: “Here's the main issue. Is it legal… if there are survivors clinging to whatever, is it legal to then strike them again?” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “The question is not actually that… No, Abby. Is the whole thing hangs on whether the boat is still a military target or not?” “Because if it was a military target, there were people on it when they hit it the first time.” Abby Phillip: “The issue when it comes to the legality of the second strike, not the first one strike… It's what happens to survivors.” Batya Ungar-Sargon: “No, it's not, Abby. That's wrong... The question is not the existence of the survivors. It's whether the boat is still a legitimate military target.”

RedWave Press

115,833 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Designers need to stop blindly copying Apple. Why is Apple failing in simplicity in design? In this clip, Don Norman (Don Norman) shares an important view on why simplicity is complex, and it isn't just about removing a few clicks or icons. I interviewed Don Norman, co-founder of Nielsen Norman Group and Author of The Design of Everyday Things, who previously was an Apple Fellow (UX)—in an exclusive, honest conversation. Don discusses the importance of making it simple, not simpler. As he describes, "Simplicity is complex." This is a hot take though, not uncommon—what are your 2c?
2:37

Designers need to stop blindly copying Apple. Why is Apple failing in simplicity in design? In this clip, Don Norman (Don Norman) shares an important view on why simplicity is complex, and it isn't just about removing a few clicks or icons. I interviewed Don Norman, co-founder of Nielsen Norman Group and Author of The Design of Everyday Things, who previously was an Apple Fellow (UX)—in an exclusive, honest conversation. Don discusses the importance of making it simple, not simpler. As he describes, "Simplicity is complex." This is a hot take though, not uncommon—what are your 2c?

Felix Lee

77,184 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Why is Billionaire Mogul Dan Peña so passionately confident that when the world learns who’s “REALLY BEHIND BITCOIN”, its’ price will drop to zero in an instant? Peña believes every durable asset ultimately anchors to: • identifiable power, • enforceable authority, • or real-world coercion (law, armies, courts, balance sheets). From his lens, Bitcoin’s strength comes from a myth of neutrality: “No issuer. No owner. No controller.” So when he says “when people learn who’s really behind Bitcoin”, he means: If Bitcoin is revealed to be tied to intelligence agencies, states, or centralized power interests, the core trust narrative collapses. In his worldview, myths break faster than markets. 2. His second axiom: Anonymous founders = engineered systems Peña does not see Satoshi Nakamoto as: • a cypherpunk idealist, • a decentralized miracle, • or a benevolent mystery. He sees anonymity at that scale as a tell, not a virtue. To Peña: • No trillion-dollar system emerges accidentally • No global monetary challenger is left alone • No sovereign threat survives without a sponsor So his logic is: “If Satoshi wasn’t one man, then it was an institution. If it was an institution, it had an agenda. If it had an agenda, it’s not neutral money.” That’s the psychological break point he’s pointing to. 3. Why he thinks price would go to zero instantly (not “down a lot”) This is key. Peña is not saying Bitcoin would decline gradually. He’s saying it would implode reflexively. Why? Because in his model, Bitcoin’s value stack is: 1. Belief in decentralization 2. Belief in neutrality 3. Belief in incorruptibility 4. Belief in independence from states If #1 collapses, #2–#4 collapse simultaneously. From his perspective, Bitcoin has: • no cash flows, • no sovereign guarantee, • no legal redemption, • no enforceable claim. So if the belief premium vanishes, there is nothing left to price. That’s why he says zero - it’s rhetorical, but it’s also philosophical. 4. His fourth axiom: States don’t tolerate parallel sovereign money Peña comes from: • defense contracting culture, • hard-power capitalism, • oil-and-steel economics. In that world: • currencies are tools of statecraft, • money = power, • power is never ceded voluntarily. So he assumes one of two things must be true: 1. Bitcoin was allowed because it’s controllable 2. Or Bitcoin was created as a containment experiment Either way, once it’s framed as state-adjacent rather than state-independent, he believes: the rebellion narrative dies and so does the speculative premium 5. Why Peña is emotionally certain, not analytically cautious This part is psychological. Peña has spent decades watching: • financial myths collapse, • paper wealth evaporate, • investors realize “the story wasn’t true.” He’s deeply suspicious of: • internet-native wealth, • leaderless systems, • generational narratives that bypass traditional power. So his confidence is not evidence-based - it’s pattern-based: “I’ve seen this movie. It always ends the same.” That’s why he sounds absolute. The crucial discernment point (this matters) Peña is not proving: • who Satoshi is, • that Bitcoin is controlled, • or that exposure is imminent. He is asserting: Bitcoin’s price depends more on belief than people admit. If that belief shatters, markets won’t negotiate - they’ll stampede. You can disagree with him and still understand why he’s confident. Thank you, Dan Peña. Bitcoin BitcoinMagazine Ripple Stellar Treasury Department CFTC
0:53

Why is Billionaire Mogul Dan Peña so passionately confident that when the world learns who’s “REALLY BEHIND BITCOIN”, its’ price will drop to zero in an instant? Peña believes every durable asset ultimately anchors to: • identifiable power, • enforceable authority, • or real-world coercion (law, armies, courts, balance sheets). From his lens, Bitcoin’s strength comes from a myth of neutrality: “No issuer. No owner. No controller.” So when he says “when people learn who’s really behind Bitcoin”, he means: If Bitcoin is revealed to be tied to intelligence agencies, states, or centralized power interests, the core trust narrative collapses. In his worldview, myths break faster than markets. 2. His second axiom: Anonymous founders = engineered systems Peña does not see Satoshi Nakamoto as: • a cypherpunk idealist, • a decentralized miracle, • or a benevolent mystery. He sees anonymity at that scale as a tell, not a virtue. To Peña: • No trillion-dollar system emerges accidentally • No global monetary challenger is left alone • No sovereign threat survives without a sponsor So his logic is: “If Satoshi wasn’t one man, then it was an institution. If it was an institution, it had an agenda. If it had an agenda, it’s not neutral money.” That’s the psychological break point he’s pointing to. 3. Why he thinks price would go to zero instantly (not “down a lot”) This is key. Peña is not saying Bitcoin would decline gradually. He’s saying it would implode reflexively. Why? Because in his model, Bitcoin’s value stack is: 1. Belief in decentralization 2. Belief in neutrality 3. Belief in incorruptibility 4. Belief in independence from states If #1 collapses, #2–#4 collapse simultaneously. From his perspective, Bitcoin has: • no cash flows, • no sovereign guarantee, • no legal redemption, • no enforceable claim. So if the belief premium vanishes, there is nothing left to price. That’s why he says zero - it’s rhetorical, but it’s also philosophical. 4. His fourth axiom: States don’t tolerate parallel sovereign money Peña comes from: • defense contracting culture, • hard-power capitalism, • oil-and-steel economics. In that world: • currencies are tools of statecraft, • money = power, • power is never ceded voluntarily. So he assumes one of two things must be true: 1. Bitcoin was allowed because it’s controllable 2. Or Bitcoin was created as a containment experiment Either way, once it’s framed as state-adjacent rather than state-independent, he believes: the rebellion narrative dies and so does the speculative premium 5. Why Peña is emotionally certain, not analytically cautious This part is psychological. Peña has spent decades watching: • financial myths collapse, • paper wealth evaporate, • investors realize “the story wasn’t true.” He’s deeply suspicious of: • internet-native wealth, • leaderless systems, • generational narratives that bypass traditional power. So his confidence is not evidence-based - it’s pattern-based: “I’ve seen this movie. It always ends the same.” That’s why he sounds absolute. The crucial discernment point (this matters) Peña is not proving: • who Satoshi is, • that Bitcoin is controlled, • or that exposure is imminent. He is asserting: Bitcoin’s price depends more on belief than people admit. If that belief shatters, markets won’t negotiate - they’ll stampede. You can disagree with him and still understand why he’s confident. Thank you, Dan Peña. Bitcoin BitcoinMagazine Ripple Stellar Treasury Department CFTC

Rob Cunningham

136,719 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

People are overthinking the 32 BTC sale. “Why sell?” “Why not just buy less next week?” “Is this bearish?” Michael Michael Saylor already explained the logic: • If Bitcoin can’t be sold, critics say it has no value. • If it has no value, the balance sheet value is zero. • If the balance sheet value is zero, credit rating agencies ignore it. • So you sell a tiny appreciated portion to prove Bitcoin is liquid, valuable, and real.
2:28

People are overthinking the 32 BTC sale. “Why sell?” “Why not just buy less next week?” “Is this bearish?” Michael Michael Saylor already explained the logic: • If Bitcoin can’t be sold, critics say it has no value. • If it has no value, the balance sheet value is zero. • If the balance sheet value is zero, credit rating agencies ignore it. • So you sell a tiny appreciated portion to prove Bitcoin is liquid, valuable, and real.

Alex 👽

1,230,739 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce