Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I’m setting the record straight on the War Powers Act, the Constitution, and the President’s authority as Commander-in-Chief. Politicians keep claiming the President must ask Congress before acting in a military crisis — but the Constitution says otherwise. Congress can declare war, but the President commands the military and...

marklevinshow's profile picture

Mark R. Levin

5,063,355 subscribers

52,174 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
1:18

In the middle of a major military campaign, critics claim the president must first ask permission from Congress. I explain why that claim is misleading — and why presidents from both parties have rejected the War Powers Act as unconstitutional. I break down the constitutional truth about presidential war powers and why politicians keep using the War Powers Act of 1973 to attack the Commander-in-Chief. The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war, but it gives the president the authority to command the military and protect the country. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,223 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
5:28

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

44,094 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The original draft gave Congress the power to “make war,” but the delegates deliberately changed it to “declare war.” Why? Because they believed Congress was too slow and too divided to conduct military decisions. The result: Congress can declare war and control funding, but the President — elected by the entire nation — serves as Commander-in-Chief and directs military action. I break down the historical record, the debates among the Founders, and why modern claims about the War Powers Act and presidential authority often ignore the Constitution’s original design. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
10:41

The original draft gave Congress the power to “make war,” but the delegates deliberately changed it to “declare war.” Why? Because they believed Congress was too slow and too divided to conduct military decisions. The result: Congress can declare war and control funding, but the President — elected by the entire nation — serves as Commander-in-Chief and directs military action. I break down the historical record, the debates among the Founders, and why modern claims about the War Powers Act and presidential authority often ignore the Constitution’s original design. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

94,340 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

TODAY ON LIBERTY'S VOICE EP009 I call out the dangerous rhetoric coming from politicians who claim America is “losing” while our military and our allies are delivering decisive victories. Our armed forces remain the most advanced and capable fighting force on earth — from cutting-edge aircraft and warships to the technology that dominates the battlefield. I also break down the truth about the War Powers Act of 1973, why presidents of both parties have rejected its constitutionality, and why critics keep using it to attack the Commander-in-Chief during wartime. This is about supporting our troops, defending the Constitution, and confronting misinformation head-on. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
1:18

TODAY ON LIBERTY'S VOICE EP009 I call out the dangerous rhetoric coming from politicians who claim America is “losing” while our military and our allies are delivering decisive victories. Our armed forces remain the most advanced and capable fighting force on earth — from cutting-edge aircraft and warships to the technology that dominates the battlefield. I also break down the truth about the War Powers Act of 1973, why presidents of both parties have rejected its constitutionality, and why critics keep using it to attack the Commander-in-Chief during wartime. This is about supporting our troops, defending the Constitution, and confronting misinformation head-on. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

20,581 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

How should a president decide whether to act against a dangerous regime like Iran? Through prudence, not ideology. I explain how Aristotle’s ideas about right reason, wisdom, and deliberation still apply to modern leadership. Decisions about war and peace aren’t slogans or “forever war” talking points—they require judgment, experience, and the willingness to confront reality. I break down the Constitution, the role of the commander in chief, the War Powers debate, the Iran nuclear threat, and why ideological thinking—from Marxism to isolationism—can lead to disaster. This is a deep dive into philosophy, foreign policy, and the real choices facing America and the free world today. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:
13:14

How should a president decide whether to act against a dangerous regime like Iran? Through prudence, not ideology. I explain how Aristotle’s ideas about right reason, wisdom, and deliberation still apply to modern leadership. Decisions about war and peace aren’t slogans or “forever war” talking points—they require judgment, experience, and the willingness to confront reality. I break down the Constitution, the role of the commander in chief, the War Powers debate, the Iran nuclear threat, and why ideological thinking—from Marxism to isolationism—can lead to disaster. This is a deep dive into philosophy, foreign policy, and the real choices facing America and the free world today. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

36,679 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

RAJU: Congress has the authority to declare war. Shouldn't it have authorized this war? MIKE JOHNSON: In my view, uh, right now our military and the commander in chief is presiding over the completion of an operation that was limited in scope
0:47

RAJU: Congress has the authority to declare war. Shouldn't it have authorized this war? MIKE JOHNSON: In my view, uh, right now our military and the commander in chief is presiding over the completion of an operation that was limited in scope

Aaron Rupar

84,353 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

REPORTER: “Are we at war in the Caribbean and if so should the president declare war and or should congress approve an authorization?” LEADER THUNE: “I think the president is acting under his authority as commander in chief...a war has been waged by these drug cartels against the United States."
0:36

REPORTER: “Are we at war in the Caribbean and if so should the president declare war and or should congress approve an authorization?” LEADER THUNE: “I think the president is acting under his authority as commander in chief...a war has been waged by these drug cartels against the United States."

Fox News

733,116 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Congress cannot sidestep the President on powers that belong solely to the Commander in Chief. President @realdonaldtrump acted well within his constitutional authority on the historic U.S. operation in Venezuela.
1:12

Congress cannot sidestep the President on powers that belong solely to the Commander in Chief. President @realdonaldtrump acted well within his constitutional authority on the historic U.S. operation in Venezuela.

Lindsey Graham

80,245 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

We need a new War Powers Act. The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war. That authority has been usurped by the presidency. No more forever wars.
0:33

We need a new War Powers Act. The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war. That authority has been usurped by the presidency. No more forever wars.

Graham Platner for Senate

51,776 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Trump's illegal military strikes in Venezuela aren't about drugs. They are about regime change. But we must be clear - only Congress has the authority to declare war. Not the president. We must pass our War Powers Resolution and re-establish Congress's power.
1:53

Trump's illegal military strikes in Venezuela aren't about drugs. They are about regime change. But we must be clear - only Congress has the authority to declare war. Not the president. We must pass our War Powers Resolution and re-establish Congress's power.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

806,464 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I react to Hakeem Jeffries declaring that America is “losing the war.” In the middle of a military campaign, rhetoric like this matters. Our troops are fighting, our allies are engaged, and our military remains the strongest on earth. I break down why defeatist language from political leaders sends a dangerous message — and why leadership during wartime should strengthen national resolve, not undermine it. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:
0:37

I react to Hakeem Jeffries declaring that America is “losing the war.” In the middle of a military campaign, rhetoric like this matters. Our troops are fighting, our allies are engaged, and our military remains the strongest on earth. I break down why defeatist language from political leaders sends a dangerous message — and why leadership during wartime should strengthen national resolve, not undermine it. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

33,687 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Trump’s attacks on Iran are both illegal and unconstitutional. Congress alone has the constitutional authority to declare war. We must vote urgently on the War Powers resolution.
2:22

Trump’s attacks on Iran are both illegal and unconstitutional. Congress alone has the constitutional authority to declare war. We must vote urgently on the War Powers resolution.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

17,835 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

No district court judge has the power to usurp the President’s executive authority and take it upon himself to act as Commander-in-Chief.
0:33

No district court judge has the power to usurp the President’s executive authority and take it upon himself to act as Commander-in-Chief.

Congressman Brandon Gill

219,687 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Constitution is never a moot point. It’s a live point, and it makes clear that war powers belong to Congress. Presidents can only defend against attacks. That means President Trump must have Congress’s authorization before engaging in further military action in Venezuela.
0:45

The Constitution is never a moot point. It’s a live point, and it makes clear that war powers belong to Congress. Presidents can only defend against attacks. That means President Trump must have Congress’s authorization before engaging in further military action in Venezuela.

Rep. Greg Stanton

13,117 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Graham: The War Powers Act was passed in 1973 by a bunch of liberal Democrats. It's a power grab by the congress against the commander in chief. Every president has rejected the idea that congress can substitute our judgment for theirs. This is an unconstitutional power grab. To my colleagues, you're doing a lot of damage. You're emboldening our enemies. Stop it.
1:31

Graham: The War Powers Act was passed in 1973 by a bunch of liberal Democrats. It's a power grab by the congress against the commander in chief. Every president has rejected the idea that congress can substitute our judgment for theirs. This is an unconstitutional power grab. To my colleagues, you're doing a lot of damage. You're emboldening our enemies. Stop it.

Acyn

174,215 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Q: Are we at war in the Caribbean? If so, should the president declare war/should Congress approve an authorization? Leader John Thune: I think the president is acting under his authority as Commander-in-Chief in a way that's consistent with what past administration's have done.
0:40

Q: Are we at war in the Caribbean? If so, should the president declare war/should Congress approve an authorization? Leader John Thune: I think the president is acting under his authority as Commander-in-Chief in a way that's consistent with what past administration's have done.

CSPAN

60,912 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Everyone is talking about the war with Iran—but the real question is what happens after victory. In this clip, I explain why history matters. From the Battle of Yorktown and the French alliance in the American Revolutionary War to the lessons of World War I and World War II, winning a war requires more than military success—it requires a strategy for what comes next. If we ignore that lesson with Iran, the Middle East, and U.S. national security, we risk repeating the mistakes that created chaos and global conflict before. Rumble: YouTube:
11:07

Everyone is talking about the war with Iran—but the real question is what happens after victory. In this clip, I explain why history matters. From the Battle of Yorktown and the French alliance in the American Revolutionary War to the lessons of World War I and World War II, winning a war requires more than military success—it requires a strategy for what comes next. If we ignore that lesson with Iran, the Middle East, and U.S. national security, we risk repeating the mistakes that created chaos and global conflict before. Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

139,980 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Trump Administration launched a military escalation in the Caribbean without ANY legal authority and without approval from Congress. I’m introducing a War Powers resolution to terminate hostilities against Venezuela and reassert Congress's constitutional role.
1:11

The Trump Administration launched a military escalation in the Caribbean without ANY legal authority and without approval from Congress. I’m introducing a War Powers resolution to terminate hostilities against Venezuela and reassert Congress's constitutional role.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

216,372 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

I think the Commander in Chief just briefed his Generals for war. But most importantly, he MADE SURE THE PUBLIC SAW IT! The message being delivered was not for the Generals. It was for We the People. The US MIL are about to (publicly) go to war with the enemy from within. The Commander in Chief just reminded his Military leadership of their sacred Oath, which is to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. I believe Trump and the US MIL are about to save the Republic.
0:33

I think the Commander in Chief just briefed his Generals for war. But most importantly, he MADE SURE THE PUBLIC SAW IT! The message being delivered was not for the Generals. It was for We the People. The US MIL are about to (publicly) go to war with the enemy from within. The Commander in Chief just reminded his Military leadership of their sacred Oath, which is to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC. I believe Trump and the US MIL are about to save the Republic.

Clandestine

1,944,214 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад