Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"Imagining a Single Trident II Missile Launched Toward Moscow: Devastating Scenario" What would happen if a single Trident II missile was launched toward Moscow? This video explores the devastating potential of this advanced nuclear-capable missile, capable of carrying multiple warheads with precision targeting. We’ll analyze its speed, destructive power,...

295,762 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля Jack Thompson
Jack Thompson1 год назад

Pure insanity at every level

Фото профиля Shockme
Shockme1 год назад

Who cares, we know that we can blow the world up. We need peace and to stop the fighting everywhere.

Фото профиля Alex Chudnovsky
Alex Chudnovsky1 год назад

That’s why it is called mutually assured destruction.

Фото профиля Ade Kind
Ade Kind1 год назад

Most western weapons are inferior to Russian's weapons... The conflict in Ukraine has detailed that

Фото профиля Borko Nikolcic
Borko Nikolcic1 год назад

Trident failed few tests. USA and UK should legitimately test it in non nuclear form and hit target 3k km away.

Фото профиля mahmud isa
mahmud isa1 год назад

Very good wef heard what the Trident could do but have you heard what the samrat could do?

Фото профиля Kev 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Kev 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿1 год назад

Trident has failed on its 2 last test launches. It don’t work.

Фото профиля Geoff1467
Geoff14671 год назад

We send some they send some and it's game over

Похожие видео

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,702 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад