Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

In an age in which decency and orderly conduct are expected to govern international life almost everywhere except, it would appear, in China itself, the Chinese Communist Party can no longer conceal its bullying and barbaric behavior—even at an international security forum in Seoul, South Korea. Its leaders appear...

35,428 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

30 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jacky Smith
Jacky Smithvor 2 Tagen

The difference is Phillipines is a nobody and China is someone going up and have threatened USA hegamony. Your only worth to the US is if you make yourself the next Ukraine and fight China for them. 🤡

Profilbild von Koreans Stand With Israel 🇰🇷🇮🇱
Koreans Stand With Israel 🇰🇷🇮🇱vor 2 Tagen

🇵🇭🇰🇷 We, the people of South Korea, stand firmly with the Philippines and condemn China’s attempts to encroach upon the territory and sovereignty of other Asian nations. The Philippines was one of the first countries to come to South Korea’s aid during the Korean War and was the first country in Southeast Asia to answer the UN’s call for military assistance. A total of 7,420 Filipino soldiers served in the Korean War, and 112 gave their lives fighting alongside us against North Korean and Chinese Communist forces. We will always remember the courage and sacrifice of the Filipino soldiers who stood with South Korea in our darkest hour, fighting alongside us and making the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom. We will always stand in solidarity with the Philippines. Together, we will stand against the Chinese Communist Party and defend the freedom and sovereignty of our nations. We, the Korean people, stand with Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto C. Teodoro, Jr. We send our love and deepest gratitude to the Philippines. We will never forget. 🇰🇷🇵🇭

Profilbild von Alpha Tweets
Alpha Tweetsvor 1 Tag

In the Philippines, between 1899 and 1902, the United States fought a war most Americans have never heard of. After defeating Spain, America decided the Philippines should not be independent. Should not govern itself. Was not ready. The Filipinos disagreed. And so America, which had declared its own independence 123 years earlier, went to war to prevent another people from winning theirs. The methods: The "water cure": forcing water into a prisoner's stomach until they talked or died. The systematic burning of villages. The forced reconcentration of civilians and collective punishment in areas of resistance. General Jacob Smith's order: kill everyone over ten. Kill everyone over ten. Between 250,000 and 1 million Filipinos died. The American general who oversaw much of it, Arthur MacArthur, was celebrated back home. His son Douglas became an even more celebrated general. The war is not in most American textbooks. When it appears, it is described as the "Philippine Insurrection." Insurrection. A Filipino fighting for Filipino independence on Filipino soil is, in the American vocabulary, an insurgent. The Americans who crossed the Pacific to prevent that independence are, in the same vocabulary, soldiers. The words are the empire's first line of defense. They were doing their job in 1902. They are still doing their job now.

Profilbild von Article Lewis
Article Lewisvor 2 Tagen

一個被中國制裁的小丑連中方人員都接觸不了,還妄想中方人員給它遞字條?用點腦子想一下都知道徹頭徹尾的小醜式自導自演。即使退一萬步來說,它手上紙條寫的是中方立場,又何來威脅和霸凌之說?至於什麼是野蠻和霸凌,菲律賓的子民難道在美國殖民菲律賓時沒有體會和認知嗎?

Profilbild von 大野昆
大野昆vor 2 Tagen

啊😧这……只是递一张纸重申中国立场而已,也没有任何侮辱用词,怎么就成了中国霸凌野蛮行为了,难道必须像川普总统那样才算是有教养和有礼貌吗

Profilbild von SimonD
SimonDvor 2 Tagen

Oh, piss off! J. Terrible, the PCG monkey who cheated at the Philippine Military Academy ... A little note to remind Gibo of China's position on the so-called award, and the drama queen Gibo has made a meal out of it. Gibo the crook tried to use the Korean platform to smear China, but other Asians aren't interested in his Filipino political agenda.

Profilbild von SouthChinase
SouthChinasevor 1 Tag

Chinese bullying? Isn't it rather Toedoro taking advantage of his position on stage to gain an edge over the Chinese representatives offstage, constantly slandering and performing?

Profilbild von JYNX
JYNXvor 2 Tagen

China is good at oppressing their own people, they thought they could do the same to the rest of the world.

Profilbild von Sofia Flores 🇵🇭
Sofia Flores 🇵🇭vor 2 Tagen

China really can’t keep calling intimidation “diplomacy.” This kind of Chinese aggression is exactly why people are worried about the West Philippine Sea. If your position is strong, defend it with facts, not pressure.

Profilbild von zuimaku
zuimakuvor 2 Tagen

Secretary of National Defense Teodoro Jr. is one of the great leaders of the free world.

Profilbild von aaliyaah3@yahoo.com

His courage and patriotic defiance in the face of bullying and intimidation are a blazing inspiration that must be emulated by every Filipino, much more from our leaders. We salute our Secretary and you, Mr. Tariela, for ur courage in protecting what belongs to the Filipinos.

Profilbild von Rylee🧊
Rylee🧊vor 1 Tag

嗯嗯中国野蛮中国霸凌,对面换成特朗普那个疯子早把菲律宾变成自己另一个州了吧,中国只是重申这么多年的一贯立场,纸条中有任何一个野蛮的词吗

Profilbild von AsoNgTsina
AsoNgTsinavor 2 Tagen

Sobrang pinahiya ni Gibo LOL

Profilbild von Diskuter
Diskutervor 1 Tag

Communist China is best described as the wretched goon of the world—throwing its weight around, bullying its neighbors, and acting like international law is merely a suggestion. What a spectacular display of “peaceful rise.” 😂

Profilbild von West Philippine Sea
West Philippine Seavor 2 Tagen

Sec. Gibo should take extra security precautions. the ChiComs can be very vengeful. 🙏🙏🕊️🇵🇭

Profilbild von Daniel J.Lim
Daniel J.Limvor 2 Tagen

If you and the maltese lapdog of america were officials in china, youd be executed by now. Chinese government cannot stand traitors and corruption in government

Profilbild von OopsMRV 🇵🇭
OopsMRV 🇵🇭vor 2 Tagen

I just hope hindi sya palitan pag nagpalit na ng admin sa 2028. You guys are doing such a great job at defending our country's rights

Profilbild von 芥末章鱼
芥末章鱼vor 1 Tag

韩国人员递交错了,而传纸是国际会议长期早有惯例,菲防长却人身攻击会议工作人员,还选择性截取内容段落,并借机政治表演,严重国际失节,给国家蒙羞,恬不知耻,令人尴尬。

Profilbild von Nic Uloth
Nic Ulothvor 1 Tag

Gets passed a note saying china doesnt agree immediately starts crying hes being bullied. Pathetic Imagine hed be inconsolable if china passed him a map showing the islands they own.

Profilbild von ☺️
☺️vor 2 Tagen

Sec @giboteodoro 👏👏👏👏

Profilbild von rere ignuts
rere ignutsvor 2 Tagen

This behavior is a symptom of their twisted authoritarian system. It leads to all sorts of malpractice towards others: organ harvesting, poison food, over-production/economic wreaking balls, etc - not only arrogant dictatorial bullying by CCP apparatuses. Keep distance.

Profilbild von Eric W
Eric Wvor 2 Tagen

必须像川普学习,有些人不打不服

Profilbild von VOCO News
VOCO Newsvor 2 Tagen

Well put — and the detail that makes this one land is that the note was read aloud before the hall, not quietly dismissed. More:

Profilbild von cookiedough
cookiedoughvor 2 Tagen

Love you guys! The great patriots! The Philippines needs more of you to stand against the big bully China.

Profilbild von El Makati
El Makativor 2 Tagen

fuck china...phillipines needs to stop crying and do something

Profilbild von Bert Pascual
Bert Pascualvor 1 Tag

💪🇵🇭🫡

Profilbild von daniel🔆
daniel🔆vor 1 Tag

看吗,奥斯卡级别的演员和评论,你还不用付电影票的费用

Profilbild von MotherfuckerUSDEVIL
MotherfuckerUSDEVILvor 1 Tag

You fucking cheap puppet of US pig. Your dad US been beat by Iran. The world know your dad US is paper tiger. Who the fuck do you think you are? you small SHITHOLE place.fucking clony of US pig Who you can count on.? Chinese all urge PLA to beat you harder next time!

Profilbild von hegel/Tin
hegel/Tinvor 2 Tagen

Abolish the ccp .

Profilbild von Tw2Scorp
Tw2Scorpvor 1 Tag

Ito at si trillanes ang ideal p & vp. At kasama ka sa gobyernong yan dapat

Ähnliche Videos

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,767 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The US is playing a very dangerous game in the South China Sea, where instead of trying to appease tensions like a responsible power should do, it backs maximalist claims that violate International Law, and lies egregiously for that purpose. Here is Nicholas Burns, the US ambassador to China, saying in an interview 2 weeks ago ( “You've seen over the last couple of months some 10 standoffs between Filipino naval forces and both Chinese coastguards and Chinese military vessels at a place called Second Thomas Shoal and also in Scarborough Shoal. Now it's important for everybody on this zoomcast to understand that the International Court of Justice, which is the relevant legal body, ruled in July 2016 decisively in favour of the Philippines. And so that that territory is the sovereign territory of the Philippines and that China’s legal claim to it has no basis in international law. All the rest of the world understands that and recognises that this is sovereign Filipino territory.” This is absolutely packed with lies. First of all, it was NOT the International Court of Justice (ICJ) but the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that made the July 2016 ruling ( This is a very important distinction because rulings by the PCA - unlike rulings by the ICJ - do NOT carry the weight of international law. Furthermore, in this case, China declined to participate in the arbitration. Secondly the PCA ruling in question absolutely does NOT confirm the Scarborough Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal as "sovereign Filipino territory". For the simple reason that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is the international law framework the PCA was asked to arbitrate under, “does not address the sovereignty of states over land territory”. In fact the PCA, in its ruling, specifically said that it had “not been asked to, and does not purport to, make any ruling as to which state enjoys sovereignty over any land territory in the South China Sea, in particular with respect to the disputes concerning sovereignty over the Spratly Islands [where the Second Thomas Shoal is] or Scarborough Shoal”! This is all the more ironic because the US is one of the rare countries out there that refused to sign or ratify UNCLOS, contrary to China... What the ruling DID say with regards to the Scarborough Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal is as follows: - For the Scarborough Shoal, it ruled that they are rocks that cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own, do not generate an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or continental shelf entitlements beyond their 12-nautical-mile territorial sea. It also ruled that both Chinese and Filipino fishermen, among others, had traditional fishing rights in the area and that no party should prevent the other from exercising these rights. - For the Second Thomas Shoal, the ruling declared that it is a "low-tide elevation", that "does not generate entitlements to a territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, or continental shelf" but that it is "within the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of the Philippines", with the consequence that the Philippines have rights over the resources in these areas. That's it, it's a ruling about maritime entitlements under UNCLOS, not about the sovereignty over these territories. Thirdly, Burns’ statement that “all the rest of the world understands that and recognises that this is sovereign Philippine territory” is even more egregious. This is patently untrue, even for US allies. For instance Britain, France and Germany in their 2020 "note verbale" to the UN on the matter ( specifically wrote that they “take no position” over the “disputed territorial sovereignty to naturally formed land features and to areas of the continental shelf in the South China Sea”. In fact, until this declaration by Burns, this would have been untrue for the US themselves! Their position so far had been that - just like Britain, France and Germany - they did not take a position on the sovereignty claims themselves. The main reason is because these claims do not only involve the PRC and the Philippines but also the ROC (Taiwan), who also claim both the Scarborough Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal, as well as Vietnam and Malaysia who have also made claims over other parts of the Spratly Islands archipelago (of which the Second Thomas Shoal is part of). As such, unilaterally siding with one of the claimants over the others is a rather bizarre position for Washington. Lastly, if the US wanted to be constructive here, instead of backing one state or the other in its maximalist claims in order to fuel conflict, it should encourage the negotiation of the Code of Conduct (CoC) for the South China Sea that's currently being discussed between ASEAN countries and China. This is a diplomatic effort to end disputes. Why not support that instead of siding with one party against others, which can only fuel the disputes? The answer is simple: this is part of a broader and immensely worrying trend which we see in U.S. conduct generally (be it in Ukraine, Gaza, Taiwan, etc.) where the U.S. 1) jumps on all opportunities to sabotage diplomacy and fan the flames of conflict and war and 2) support the arbitrary and ever-changing self-interested rules of its "rules-based order" in opposition of International Law. Why do they do that? I genuinely think we need to seriously ask ourselves if the U.S. doesn't want to recreate a WW2-type scenario where the whole world is in flames and the U.S., protected by its immensely favorable geography, ends up reaping the benefits. If there's a "great reset" initiative going on, that might be the one. WW2 placed the U.S. at the top of the global pecking order: at a time when this "leadership" is crumbling down, it's not inconceivable that they wouldn't mind a remake...

Arnaud Bertrand

411,023 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

LANDMARK US-UK RESEARCH SAYS CHINA IS NOT TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD Top scholars in the US and the UK just published a landmark discovery: China is NOT trying to take over the world. In perhaps the most important geopolitics paper I've seen this year, the journal of International Security features a paper in which extensive research examined data from 12,000 Chinese articles and speeches and came to an astonishing conclusion: China has NO plan to replace the US as self-appointed leader of the world. It also has NO plan to force anyone else to copy its system of governance, unlike the west. This is terrible news for Apple Daily’s Mark Clifford (a Gordon Chang clone) – who wrote a whole book saying that China was actively working to remodel the whole world in its image. (China doesn't even insist on its model of governance in its country -- the place is full of special economic zones experimenting with other ways of governances.) . NOT A MILITARY THREAT Also important: the newly published International security paper says that China is NOT a military threat. “China does not pose the type of military threat that the conventional wisdom claims it does," the researchers say. "Thus, a hostile U.S. military posture in the Pacific is unwise and may unnecessarily create tensions.” . CHINA LOOKS INWARD In fact, this paper says almost exactly what this commentator and many others have been saying, literally, for years, in almost the same words. China does NOT have the western insistence on ruling the world – instead, it wants to maintain its borders and have positive relationships with other countries. “China's aims are unambiguous, enduring, and limited: It cares about its borders, sovereignty, and foreign economic relations,” the paper says. . COLBY IS WRONG China’s legal land area includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, and Xinjiang, and it just wants to keep them. That’s all. The article quotes Elbridge Colby, now Deputy Secretary of Defense, envisioning China subjugating Taiwan and then picking out further targets to take over, including the Philippines and Vietnam. That is simply wrong, the researchers say. China has never made the slightest indication that it wants to take control of other countries. (And of course some newspapers reported that China wants to invade Australia!) . NOT PROPAGANDA This very lengthy paper in the journal of International Security is not, I repeat NOT, some sort of “pro-China propaganda”. The article is written by two US-based political scientists and one UK-based academic. The writers are in fact rather harsh about China, and recycle the endless trope implying that China is the world capital of human rights abuses (which it clearly isn't), and says that China is doing terrible things in the South China Sea – which is also not true. The writers do seem to have sucked up lots of the anti-China propaganda themselves. So that makes their work, which shows clearly that China is NOT a threat to the world, more valuable. I will provide the link for those who want to read further.

Nury Vittachi

28,217 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Irony is Painful. China urged the United States not to use other countries as an excuse to pursue its own interests, after Trump said the US needed to own Greenland to prevent Russia or China from occupying it in the future. “The Arctic is in the overall interest of the international community. China’s activities in the Arctic aim to promote peace, stability, and sustainable development in the region, and are in accordance with international law. The rights and freedoms of all countries to conduct activities in the Arctic in accordance with the law should be fully respected. The United States should not use other countries as an excuse to pursue its own selfish interests.” China talking about 'international law' and 'peaceful development' is hilarious. They spent the last decade building illegal military bases on artificial islands in the South China Sea, ignoring the Hague’s rulings, and now they want to lecture everyone on maritime rights in the Arctic? They claim to respect 'territorial integrity,' yet they won't even call putin’s invasion of Ukraine an invasion. They’re fine with Russia redrawing borders in Europe with tanks, but the second the US looks at a map of the Arctic, suddenly China is the world's leading expert on the UN Charter. China is about as 'near-Arctic' as Florida is 'near-Canada.' This 'Polar Silk Road' is just a code word for securing resource routes while they let Russia do the dirty work of destabilising the West. Both powers, China and the U.S. are essentially playing the same game while using different scripts. It is a race to see who can ignore international norms faster. China uses 'economic development' and 'scientific research' as a mask for expansion, while Trump uses 'national security' and 'defense' as a mask for land-lust. In the end, nobody actually cares what the people of Greenland want. China criticises US 'selfish interests' while bullying every neighbour in the Pacific. Trump criticises China's 'aggression' while threatening to invade a NATO partner. It’s just two giants pointing fingers while they both try to grab the same piece of melting ice.

Yasmina

17,798 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,095 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

During an interview at the Hoover Institution on 15 Nov 2023, Elbridge Colby and Dan Blumenthal explain why the United States has become obsessed with containing China and curtailing its economic development. In a nutshell, a prosperous China would deprive the US of its global economic control as well as the ability to rewrite rules and to rob other countries. For the US, it's a zero-sum game in which America's imperial empire mentality is projected onto China, and every other nation is subservient to America's national interests. This perspective essentially disregards the advantages of a collaborative and multipolar global order. According to Colby and Blumenthal, the US would be locked out of "economic arrangements" inside East Asia which have the potential to boom and to be the center of future global economic activity. The US military would be reduced to defending the North American Hemisphere and would be locked out of East Asia, but the US would really need access to East Asia to secure itself (economically), or else Americans would be poorer as a prosperous China would re-orient the world towards Asia. China would have the best Universities, its companies would be world's best, its treasury would be able to enforce sanctions against everyone else, its stock exchange would be the world's best, its currency would supplant the USD - which means we Americans will become a lot poorer. As America would be forced to play ball, in the same way that today many companies and other countries are forced to play ball with US sanctions even tough they don't want to. That would mean Americans will become lot poorer as our companies, institutions would be no longer the top ones, and then we become less free as America would loose its global economic control When asked if the US can accept that a great rich China dominates its own region vs dominating the planet, their conclusion is that the US can't live with either scenario because East Asia is just so fundamentally important to US national security

StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭

94,788 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren