正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

In an interview about gun control with Oklahoma State Senator Nathan Dahm, Jon Stewart argues Dahm's support of anti-drag show laws directly conflicts with the logic he uses for loosening gun restrictions.

674,651 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Fireball Raider 🏴‍☠️ 的头像
Fireball Raider 🏴‍☠️3 年前

Jon Stewart is a classic example of an old guy who has no idea what’s going on but knows the ‘kids’ are into this woke thing so he overcompensates hoping people will think he’s still cool

Me 的头像
Me3 年前

I like a lot of what John says, but I totally disagree here. Adults used to have to show an ID to watch a drag show. It was, like strippers, considered adult entertainment. So, lets go half a step farther. Is it ok for kids to watch porn? Thats basicly what this is. Its wrong

Yo 的头像
Yo3 年前

They should absolutely be banned. John Stewart is a joke

Uncensored Truths 的头像
Uncensored Truths3 年前

The interviewee is actually very patient. The interviewer was hostile, angry and already picked a side. He was just trying to drive home a point. I would not give such a person my precious time. Cringe

Lea 的头像
Lea3 年前

@jonstewart Children should not be attending drag shows or strip clubs.

Andrea E 的头像
Andrea E3 年前

Progressives have no trouble trampling or even eliminating protected rights. Just don't let anyone get stopped and frisked. All hell breaks loose. Suddenly rights matter more than anything, including the safety of citizens besieged by neighborhood crime.

Irish Of The Grey 的头像
Irish Of The Grey3 年前

I LOVE Jon Stewart...he's right!

The Kid 的头像
The Kid3 年前

John Stewart tries to have it both ways. He says a law banning kids Drag shows won't curtail them but will drive them underground. Yet he maintains that a law banning guns will cure mass shootings. So in one case, a law will work, but in another a law won't work. Nah.

Chris Smith 的头像
Chris Smith3 年前

This is Dem logic... let's compare perversion to protected constitutional rights. 😂

Rose stone 的头像
Rose stone3 年前

You realize you can't really argue with Nazis, don't you? They don't value language and meaning the way you do. I swear.

相关视频

Governor Gavin Newsom didn’t get the friendly interview he might have expected when he joined The Shawn Ryan Show. Instead, he found himself pressed on the very issues that have defined...and haunted...his political career. Even before Covid came up, the conversation turned to one of the country’s most divisive topics: guns. Ryan opened the exchange with a direct question: “Do you think that everyday citizens carrying a gun reduces crime or increases crime?” Newsom didn’t hesitate, delivering the argument he’s repeated for years. “I think the evidence, the evidence suggests the opposite. It increases the likelihood of a gun death,” he said, insisting that states with stricter gun laws see fewer gun deaths. “And you look at all the states with the most comprehensive gun safety reforms, they have lower gun death rates than states with weaker gun laws. And there's a correlation there.” “California is one of the lowest gun death rates in America. The highest murder rates in the county tend to be red states.” Ryan wasn’t convinced. He brought up Chicago—a city with strict gun laws but among the nation’s leaders in shootings and homicides. “Well, I thought Chicago was the number one?” Newsom faltered. “No.....well.....as cities you'll have different experiences, but at state levels, gun safety from our perspective, saves lives,” he tried. He insisted the data proved his point. “We have the data to bear that out.” But there’s a reason that argument often feels hollow. California’s overall gun death rate might look better than the national average on paper, but its largest cities have become with violent crime rates that defy easy talking points. For anyone paying attention to the crime waves in Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco, it was hard not to see the disconnect.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

408,837 次观看 • 1 年前