Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"In some ways this conversation keeps getting reframed very unproductively as, 'do you support Tucker Carlson,' or 'do you you know broadly align with Tucker Carlson or MTG or whomever.' And it's like, well, I agree with his view on Palestine narrowly. I support the fact that he's platforming...

briebriejoy's profile picture

Briahna Joy Gray

434,097 subscribers

17,937 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Here is the video for reference. I am sorry that happened to you Meghan. It wasn’t Tucker. It was Milo. You can tell Tucker is very uncomfortable by this entire conversation since he keeps touching his face. If someone sat and told me this stuff too, I would be very weirded out as well and not know how to respond. You can’t really talk to crazy.
3:38

Here is the video for reference. I am sorry that happened to you Meghan. It wasn’t Tucker. It was Milo. You can tell Tucker is very uncomfortable by this entire conversation since he keeps touching his face. If someone sat and told me this stuff too, I would be very weirded out as well and not know how to respond. You can’t really talk to crazy.

Anna Matson

22,517 views • 9 months ago

🚨 TUCKER CARLSON EXPRESSES GRATITUDE FOR 𝕏 and Elon Musk TUCKER: "Really grateful to be living in this super cool historical moment where this billionaire decides, hey, I like free speech. I'm going to make it possible for people I've never met, like, who does that? Well, he did that. Whatever you think of Elon, and maybe you disagree with this or disagree with that or whatever you think of the guy, he did indisputably do that. And it's kind of without parallel in history, like, who's ever done anything like that? And so I'm grateful. I mean it." 🚨SPACE LIVE NOW with Tucker Carlson, Patrick Bet-David, Candice Owens, Tristan Tate, Charlie Kirk
0:27

🚨 TUCKER CARLSON EXPRESSES GRATITUDE FOR 𝕏 and Elon Musk TUCKER: "Really grateful to be living in this super cool historical moment where this billionaire decides, hey, I like free speech. I'm going to make it possible for people I've never met, like, who does that? Well, he did that. Whatever you think of Elon, and maybe you disagree with this or disagree with that or whatever you think of the guy, he did indisputably do that. And it's kind of without parallel in history, like, who's ever done anything like that? And so I'm grateful. I mean it." 🚨SPACE LIVE NOW with Tucker Carlson, Patrick Bet-David, Candice Owens, Tristan Tate, Charlie Kirk

Mario Nawfal

462,887 views • 2 years ago

Tucker Carlson is—to put it bluntly—transing himself into a leftist. Tucker announced that he is leaving the Republican Party. "I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support, how could I or any American voters support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. Like, that's, that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that." Here's the point that needs to be made about that statement by Tucker Carlson. He said he would not support the Republican Party, nor is he going to support the Democrat Party and that's where I would challenge everyone to pause our thinking for a moment. If you refuse to vote for the Republican candidate, then you are, in effect, joining the Democrats. This is not some abstention that gives you moral high ground, because you don't 100% agree with the Republicans, or 100% agree with the Democrats, so you can't in good conscience, cast your vote because it might feel like an implicit endorsement of things that you don't agree with. No, no, no. If you do not vote for a Republican, you are, in effect, giving your opponent, the Democrats, a vote. Surrendering your vote gives your opponent an increased chance of winning because we are in a binary system. Either their values will prevail, or our values will prevail. So, if you refuse to vote for a Republican because you have even a significant policy disagreement with that politician, then you are effectively voting for racism against white people because that's what the Democrats stand for—wokeness, DEI, and ESG. I have never met a politician, read about a politician, or studied a politician with whom I agree 100% of the time. Disagreeing with a president on one policy is not a reason to blow up the rest of our agenda and, effectively, join the enemy—even if you claim you're not joining the enemy. Again, you don't have to agree with a politician on every policy in order to cast your vote for him, support him, or to be part of this general political party apparatus through which he is able to challenge the communists and anti-American zealots who are trying to take us down. So, I'm sorry to see Tucker leave the Republican Party. That makes me sad.
2:23

Tucker Carlson is—to put it bluntly—transing himself into a leftist. Tucker announced that he is leaving the Republican Party. "I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party. I'm not going to support the Democratic Party. I don't know what I'm going to do. But at this point, you know, how could you support, how could I or any American voters support a political party that's not loyal to the United States? That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. Like, that's, that's, you know, it's not possible to vote for people like that." Here's the point that needs to be made about that statement by Tucker Carlson. He said he would not support the Republican Party, nor is he going to support the Democrat Party and that's where I would challenge everyone to pause our thinking for a moment. If you refuse to vote for the Republican candidate, then you are, in effect, joining the Democrats. This is not some abstention that gives you moral high ground, because you don't 100% agree with the Republicans, or 100% agree with the Democrats, so you can't in good conscience, cast your vote because it might feel like an implicit endorsement of things that you don't agree with. No, no, no. If you do not vote for a Republican, you are, in effect, giving your opponent, the Democrats, a vote. Surrendering your vote gives your opponent an increased chance of winning because we are in a binary system. Either their values will prevail, or our values will prevail. So, if you refuse to vote for a Republican because you have even a significant policy disagreement with that politician, then you are effectively voting for racism against white people because that's what the Democrats stand for—wokeness, DEI, and ESG. I have never met a politician, read about a politician, or studied a politician with whom I agree 100% of the time. Disagreeing with a president on one policy is not a reason to blow up the rest of our agenda and, effectively, join the enemy—even if you claim you're not joining the enemy. Again, you don't have to agree with a politician on every policy in order to cast your vote for him, support him, or to be part of this general political party apparatus through which he is able to challenge the communists and anti-American zealots who are trying to take us down. So, I'm sorry to see Tucker leave the Republican Party. That makes me sad.

Liz Wheeler

83,512 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 Tucker Carlson is raising uncomfortable questions about where this war is heading: Americans aren't ready to support ground troops in Iran. But ground troops may be what it actually takes to win. So how do you close that gap? Tucker's suggestion: historically, that gap has been closed by a dramatic event that shifts public opinion overnight. He also notes: if Iran were a genuine threat to American national security, troops would already be on the ground. The fact they aren't, in his view, says something about who this war is really being fought for. Source: Tucker Carlson
0:36

🇺🇸 Tucker Carlson is raising uncomfortable questions about where this war is heading: Americans aren't ready to support ground troops in Iran. But ground troops may be what it actually takes to win. So how do you close that gap? Tucker's suggestion: historically, that gap has been closed by a dramatic event that shifts public opinion overnight. He also notes: if Iran were a genuine threat to American national security, troops would already be on the ground. The fact they aren't, in his view, says something about who this war is really being fought for. Source: Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

189,006 views • 5 months ago

One reason why I like Twitter is that it gives me the ability to respond to people like Tucker Carlson just minutes after he puts out an episode.. So here are my thoughts on Tucker Carlson's first episode of "Tucker on Twitter". Give it a watch and let me know what you think. - Carlson said that the attack on the Kakhovka dam is an act of terrorism. I would agree to an extent. While this is taking place in a time of war I wouldn't consider it any different than any attack Russia has made on Ukraine though. I would consider the entire war to be an act of Terrorism on behalf of Russia. - Carlson said that the dam was effectively Russian and is in Russian controlled territory. Yes the dam is in Russian controlled territory, but that's because Russia has invaded this area. The dam is in Ukraine. - Carlson claimed that a fair person would conclude that Ukraine blew it up just like the Nord Stream pipeline. Carlson is right about the Nord Stream. It does appear that Ukrainians blew it up. I don't believe he is right to say that "a fair person would conclude" that Ukraine blew up the dam. This is still a debatable topic and both countries could have had motive to blow it up. Most experts say that it's too early to tell but more evidence would point to an internal explosion than an external explosion. This would mean it would be more likely that Russia did it if it was intentional. It's still too early to tell though. - Carlson said that the US media blamed Russia for the dam. Yes some US media blamed Russia but others blamed Ukraine. Most mainstream media hasn't reached a conclusion and has just reported the facts thus far. - Carlson showed a video of Lindsey Graham and President Zelensky where Lindsey Graham appears to say "Russians are dying, it's the best money we've ever spent." This video is highly misleading. The video was edited by Ukraine to make it look as though this was all said at the same time. In reality, Graham said "It's the bests money we've ever spent," and then later on in the meeting said "Russian's are dying." It wasn't said together or in the order portrayed in the video. - Carlson said that it's possible that Americans are the least informed people in the world. Anyone with common sense would realize that people in many countries like China are not allowed to even view Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter. Many nations like North Korea only allow state-propaganda to air on TV and the internet. - Carlson said that UFOs are real and so is extraterrestrial life. I agree, and I agree with Tucker that the media should be more focused on covering stuff like this than all of the culture war stories. - Carlson said that we live in ignorance because the US has classified a billion public documents. I guess that depends on what a "public document" is, but I would agree that the American people in general should have access to more information like information about JFK, UFOs, etc. I feel too much information is kept classified for too long. - Carlson said that "Twitter is the short waved radio under the blankets," referring to how Soviets used to listen to non-Soviet radio stations under the blankets during the cold war just so they could hear the news from outside of Soviet-run media. I agree. I believe Twitter has the opportunity to allow people to exchange information that they receive both through the mainstream media and from other sources. While Tucker's show was definitely less divisive than it was on Fox News, I believe he is still pushing ideas that aren't backed by fact. But that's OK. He's allowed to give his opinions and now Twitter users like me and you can push back with facts and our own opinions.
14:42

One reason why I like Twitter is that it gives me the ability to respond to people like Tucker Carlson just minutes after he puts out an episode.. So here are my thoughts on Tucker Carlson's first episode of "Tucker on Twitter". Give it a watch and let me know what you think. - Carlson said that the attack on the Kakhovka dam is an act of terrorism. I would agree to an extent. While this is taking place in a time of war I wouldn't consider it any different than any attack Russia has made on Ukraine though. I would consider the entire war to be an act of Terrorism on behalf of Russia. - Carlson said that the dam was effectively Russian and is in Russian controlled territory. Yes the dam is in Russian controlled territory, but that's because Russia has invaded this area. The dam is in Ukraine. - Carlson claimed that a fair person would conclude that Ukraine blew it up just like the Nord Stream pipeline. Carlson is right about the Nord Stream. It does appear that Ukrainians blew it up. I don't believe he is right to say that "a fair person would conclude" that Ukraine blew up the dam. This is still a debatable topic and both countries could have had motive to blow it up. Most experts say that it's too early to tell but more evidence would point to an internal explosion than an external explosion. This would mean it would be more likely that Russia did it if it was intentional. It's still too early to tell though. - Carlson said that the US media blamed Russia for the dam. Yes some US media blamed Russia but others blamed Ukraine. Most mainstream media hasn't reached a conclusion and has just reported the facts thus far. - Carlson showed a video of Lindsey Graham and President Zelensky where Lindsey Graham appears to say "Russians are dying, it's the best money we've ever spent." This video is highly misleading. The video was edited by Ukraine to make it look as though this was all said at the same time. In reality, Graham said "It's the bests money we've ever spent," and then later on in the meeting said "Russian's are dying." It wasn't said together or in the order portrayed in the video. - Carlson said that it's possible that Americans are the least informed people in the world. Anyone with common sense would realize that people in many countries like China are not allowed to even view Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter. Many nations like North Korea only allow state-propaganda to air on TV and the internet. - Carlson said that UFOs are real and so is extraterrestrial life. I agree, and I agree with Tucker that the media should be more focused on covering stuff like this than all of the culture war stories. - Carlson said that we live in ignorance because the US has classified a billion public documents. I guess that depends on what a "public document" is, but I would agree that the American people in general should have access to more information like information about JFK, UFOs, etc. I feel too much information is kept classified for too long. - Carlson said that "Twitter is the short waved radio under the blankets," referring to how Soviets used to listen to non-Soviet radio stations under the blankets during the cold war just so they could hear the news from outside of Soviet-run media. I agree. I believe Twitter has the opportunity to allow people to exchange information that they receive both through the mainstream media and from other sources. While Tucker's show was definitely less divisive than it was on Fox News, I believe he is still pushing ideas that aren't backed by fact. But that's OK. He's allowed to give his opinions and now Twitter users like me and you can push back with facts and our own opinions.

Ed Krassenstein

484,994 views • 3 years ago

NEW: 🚨 Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson Refuses To Say Whether Israel Has A Right To Exist During Shocking Interview With US Ambassador To Israel Ambassador Mike Huckabee 🚨 Tucker Carlson told Ambassador Mike Huckabee that he's one of the people who "somehow don't believe that Israel has a right to this land." Huckabee then threw him a lifeline by asking, "Do you think Israel has a right to this land?" Tucker again refused to support Israel's right to exist, saying, "I really don't know." Remember, Tucker talks often about how he “loves” Israel, how he wishes it well, and that Jerusalem is his “favorite city”. But now, Tucker can't even say that Israel has the right to exist?!?! This is an Islamic, genocidal talking point.
0:22

NEW: 🚨 Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson Refuses To Say Whether Israel Has A Right To Exist During Shocking Interview With US Ambassador To Israel Ambassador Mike Huckabee 🚨 Tucker Carlson told Ambassador Mike Huckabee that he's one of the people who "somehow don't believe that Israel has a right to this land." Huckabee then threw him a lifeline by asking, "Do you think Israel has a right to this land?" Tucker again refused to support Israel's right to exist, saying, "I really don't know." Remember, Tucker talks often about how he “loves” Israel, how he wishes it well, and that Jerusalem is his “favorite city”. But now, Tucker can't even say that Israel has the right to exist?!?! This is an Islamic, genocidal talking point.

Laura Loomer

117,566 views • 6 months ago

TUCKER CARLSON: “I’ll be tormented for a long time by the fact that I played a role in getting Donald Trump elected. And I want to say that I’m sorry for misleading people.” This is a very humble and honest statement. Big respect to Tucker.
3:27

TUCKER CARLSON: “I’ll be tormented for a long time by the fact that I played a role in getting Donald Trump elected. And I want to say that I’m sorry for misleading people.” This is a very humble and honest statement. Big respect to Tucker.

Stew Peters

3,079,047 views • 4 months ago

Frost: Do you think most Iowans would agree with President Trump that FEMA should suddenly stop existing ? Reynolds: I don't think he's eliminating, and I think that what I had understood was he was thinking that maybe it should go back to the states Frost: The president was very clear on this. He believes that the agency, FEMA should be completely eliminated. Do you agree with that or do you not agree with that? I mean, it's OK to disagree sometimes with, you know, Reynolds: Well, I'm not afraid to disagree.
1:24

Frost: Do you think most Iowans would agree with President Trump that FEMA should suddenly stop existing ? Reynolds: I don't think he's eliminating, and I think that what I had understood was he was thinking that maybe it should go back to the states Frost: The president was very clear on this. He believes that the agency, FEMA should be completely eliminated. Do you agree with that or do you not agree with that? I mean, it's OK to disagree sometimes with, you know, Reynolds: Well, I'm not afraid to disagree.

Acyn

188,384 views • 1 year ago

Did you see this from the pastor from Lakepointe Church? I know I follow him on here, but I can't remember his name. If you do please tag him under this post because his thoughts on Tucker Carlson are brilliant and he should get credit. Tucker is VERY selective about which religions can be criticized and which cannot. The fact that this isn't an alarm bell for everyone says everything about how ideologically captured so many of you are....
2:12

Did you see this from the pastor from Lakepointe Church? I know I follow him on here, but I can't remember his name. If you do please tag him under this post because his thoughts on Tucker Carlson are brilliant and he should get credit. Tucker is VERY selective about which religions can be criticized and which cannot. The fact that this isn't an alarm bell for everyone says everything about how ideologically captured so many of you are....

Lj Priest (Trader Jill)

46,780 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson Says Refusing the COVID Vax Is One of His GREATEST Achievements “I think the vaccine is poison.” “Whatever you think of how toxic it is, it clearly doesn't work. And so, why is this still on the schedule? And why doesn't anyone say that? I just feel like we're living in this moment where the most obvious things go totally ignored,” Carlson said. “[It’s clear that] getting the vax and getting the boosters makes you more likely to get COVID. The numbers seem to show that. I never got vaxxed—not to brag. I hate to, like, rub that in people's faces, because I'm obviously very proud of it. One of my greatest achievements.”
2:26

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson Says Refusing the COVID Vax Is One of His GREATEST Achievements “I think the vaccine is poison.” “Whatever you think of how toxic it is, it clearly doesn't work. And so, why is this still on the schedule? And why doesn't anyone say that? I just feel like we're living in this moment where the most obvious things go totally ignored,” Carlson said. “[It’s clear that] getting the vax and getting the boosters makes you more likely to get COVID. The numbers seem to show that. I never got vaxxed—not to brag. I hate to, like, rub that in people's faces, because I'm obviously very proud of it. One of my greatest achievements.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,009,514 views • 2 years ago

There’s A Very Real Possibility Of Gavin Newsom Entering The 2024 Presidential Race Due To Joe Biden Being Brain Dead ‌ Tucker explains the truth about Newsom running for President and that California elections are rigged for him Tucker Carlson “I know Gavin Newsom. You know, I think a lot about Gavin Newsom, many different things about Gavin Newsom. But one thing I know for a fact about Gavin Newsom is he has the capacity to beat a lie detector test. Gavin Newsom will say anything he needs to say, not like Biden is not like this, actually. Whatever Biden's fault, he's not like this. Like, Biden would you know, he has, like, guilt. If he's lying to you, he gets twitchy. ‌ Gavin Newsom's palms don't sweat. His respiration doesn't increase. His body temperature doesn't change. Nothing changes in Gavin Newsom when he lies to your face, and there are not that many people like that, actually. That's a rare quality. Like, to lock down the state, to keep people's kids from getting an education, and to arrest people for surfing and then go have dinner at the French Laundry, like, most people couldn't do that. They'd just be like, I… ‌ Interviewer: “You’re saying he's a sociopath? Just he can lie and not care.” ‌ Tucker Carlson: “I'm not a psychiatrist, but I so I don't know that I don't really know the category, and I'm not gonna diagnose him. But I'll just say in 50 years of being around a lot of people, I've met very few who can behave that way, very, very few. It's very unusual quality, and, of course, it's probably useful in politics.” ‌ Interviewer: “Is Is he electable? Is he electable? Yeah. Exactly. Are the American people gonna see that the way that you see it? Or” ‌ Tucker Carlson: “Well, as you know, the system in California does not include elections. I mean, it has nothing to do with what the people think. It's a it's a machine state. It's the most corrupt out of 50. Kamala Harris was, like, despised by most Californians and she, you know, was a sitting US senator. ‌ — So it's like it's not a democratic state small D, democratic state does not run on the basis of what the population wants, it's a fixed game in California. And so it does make me very uncomfortable that someone from that political culture, which is an utterly corrupt political culture, an authoritarian political culture could, like, enter a presidential race. Because, like, clearly, what are you running on if you're Gavin Newsom? As a native Californian, you know, I know what the state was like in 1985 because I lived there, and it's completely degraded from that from that time and, like, how did that happen? Well, part of the big reason the big reason is the political leadership in the state. You've got nothing to run when are you running? Have you driven through LA recently? Like, seriously. So the fact that he would get in the race suggests, you know, they think that they can win without the consent of voters, and that freaks me out.”
2:36

There’s A Very Real Possibility Of Gavin Newsom Entering The 2024 Presidential Race Due To Joe Biden Being Brain Dead ‌ Tucker explains the truth about Newsom running for President and that California elections are rigged for him Tucker Carlson “I know Gavin Newsom. You know, I think a lot about Gavin Newsom, many different things about Gavin Newsom. But one thing I know for a fact about Gavin Newsom is he has the capacity to beat a lie detector test. Gavin Newsom will say anything he needs to say, not like Biden is not like this, actually. Whatever Biden's fault, he's not like this. Like, Biden would you know, he has, like, guilt. If he's lying to you, he gets twitchy. ‌ Gavin Newsom's palms don't sweat. His respiration doesn't increase. His body temperature doesn't change. Nothing changes in Gavin Newsom when he lies to your face, and there are not that many people like that, actually. That's a rare quality. Like, to lock down the state, to keep people's kids from getting an education, and to arrest people for surfing and then go have dinner at the French Laundry, like, most people couldn't do that. They'd just be like, I… ‌ Interviewer: “You’re saying he's a sociopath? Just he can lie and not care.” ‌ Tucker Carlson: “I'm not a psychiatrist, but I so I don't know that I don't really know the category, and I'm not gonna diagnose him. But I'll just say in 50 years of being around a lot of people, I've met very few who can behave that way, very, very few. It's very unusual quality, and, of course, it's probably useful in politics.” ‌ Interviewer: “Is Is he electable? Is he electable? Yeah. Exactly. Are the American people gonna see that the way that you see it? Or” ‌ Tucker Carlson: “Well, as you know, the system in California does not include elections. I mean, it has nothing to do with what the people think. It's a it's a machine state. It's the most corrupt out of 50. Kamala Harris was, like, despised by most Californians and she, you know, was a sitting US senator. ‌ — So it's like it's not a democratic state small D, democratic state does not run on the basis of what the population wants, it's a fixed game in California. And so it does make me very uncomfortable that someone from that political culture, which is an utterly corrupt political culture, an authoritarian political culture could, like, enter a presidential race. Because, like, clearly, what are you running on if you're Gavin Newsom? As a native Californian, you know, I know what the state was like in 1985 because I lived there, and it's completely degraded from that from that time and, like, how did that happen? Well, part of the big reason the big reason is the political leadership in the state. You've got nothing to run when are you running? Have you driven through LA recently? Like, seriously. So the fact that he would get in the race suggests, you know, they think that they can win without the consent of voters, and that freaks me out.”

Wall Street Apes

890,656 views • 2 years ago

Tucker Carlson was shocked when a hacker turned an ordinary light bulb into a device capable of spying on a Wi-Fi network. Ryan Montgomery: He took a regular bulb off of Amazon, it’s called uh Wyze. Like, and then he made a bunch of different ones. So, like you could buy this smart bulb on Amazon and make it change colors. Essentially, all that it does. He, uh, he put modified software or firmware onto this bulb. Tucker Carlson: And I can communicate with that light bulb from afar? Ryan Montgomery: Um, in in this this bulb, no, I have to you have to be within Wi-Fi range. There are other devices, they are implants that you could, at a distance, with SIM cards or or other means. Um, or if they’re plugged directly into the back of a computer, you know, like I do have one of those in my bag that you would never know, you would never unplug it because it looks like it’s it’s supposed to be there. That one connects, you know, I could be in Guatemala, and I can have complete control over that device from Guatemala. Tucker Carlson: Wow.
2:55

Tucker Carlson was shocked when a hacker turned an ordinary light bulb into a device capable of spying on a Wi-Fi network. Ryan Montgomery: He took a regular bulb off of Amazon, it’s called uh Wyze. Like, and then he made a bunch of different ones. So, like you could buy this smart bulb on Amazon and make it change colors. Essentially, all that it does. He, uh, he put modified software or firmware onto this bulb. Tucker Carlson: And I can communicate with that light bulb from afar? Ryan Montgomery: Um, in in this this bulb, no, I have to you have to be within Wi-Fi range. There are other devices, they are implants that you could, at a distance, with SIM cards or or other means. Um, or if they’re plugged directly into the back of a computer, you know, like I do have one of those in my bag that you would never know, you would never unplug it because it looks like it’s it’s supposed to be there. That one connects, you know, I could be in Guatemala, and I can have complete control over that device from Guatemala. Tucker Carlson: Wow.

Ruzy.hl

671,619 views • 2 months ago

Andrew Klavan says Tucker Carlson has "lost his way" & that Tucker's speech was "suggesting that the Jews had something to do with the death of Charlie Kirk." I wish more people on the right were this honest about Tucker.
2:29

Andrew Klavan says Tucker Carlson has "lost his way" & that Tucker's speech was "suggesting that the Jews had something to do with the death of Charlie Kirk." I wish more people on the right were this honest about Tucker.

Britta | NoSoup4Knowles

334,602 views • 11 months ago

Tucker Carlson admits he sincerely believed he could stop the war with Iran, and what being wrong taught him. This is the rare moment Tucker turns the lens on himself: CARLSON: "It's good to be reminded of how absurd you are, and how powerless you are. "I've gone through periods where I'm like, I'm going to make a big difference. I'm going to stop the war with Iran, which I sincerely believed. I thought that I could do that. I don't know why I thought that. It's embarrassing in retrospect, but I really did think that. "I'm glad I have been shorn of that illusion because it's an illusion, it's absurd. I am one guy. And even if I were a million guys, it's still a lie to tell ourselves that we're in charge of history." "The theme I took away from reading them [the Old and New Testaments], in the Hebrew text and the Christian text, is: you are not God. Just remember that. It's really hard to remember that. It sounds easy, but it's been the thing I forget most often. "You really think you're in charge, but you're not."
1:10

Tucker Carlson admits he sincerely believed he could stop the war with Iran, and what being wrong taught him. This is the rare moment Tucker turns the lens on himself: CARLSON: "It's good to be reminded of how absurd you are, and how powerless you are. "I've gone through periods where I'm like, I'm going to make a big difference. I'm going to stop the war with Iran, which I sincerely believed. I thought that I could do that. I don't know why I thought that. It's embarrassing in retrospect, but I really did think that. "I'm glad I have been shorn of that illusion because it's an illusion, it's absurd. I am one guy. And even if I were a million guys, it's still a lie to tell ourselves that we're in charge of history." "The theme I took away from reading them [the Old and New Testaments], in the Hebrew text and the Christian text, is: you are not God. Just remember that. It's really hard to remember that. It sounds easy, but it's been the thing I forget most often. "You really think you're in charge, but you're not."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

580,050 views • 1 month ago

Conventional wisdom in media is that we have a moral obligation to support Israel. No one ever asks why. And no one ever asked the American people if they agree. So, when I was on with Tucker Carlson, I challenged media to do this poll: “Does America owe Israel any more money?”
0:45

Conventional wisdom in media is that we have a moral obligation to support Israel. No one ever asks why. And no one ever asked the American people if they agree. So, when I was on with Tucker Carlson, I challenged media to do this poll: “Does America owe Israel any more money?”

Cenk Uygur

33,668 views • 7 months ago

Tucker Carlson: "I feel sorry for [Donald Trump], as I do for all slaves." The BBC: "So are you saying he's a slave to Benjamin Netanyahu?" Tucker Carlson: "You could summarise it that way and you wouldn't be totally inaccurate." The BBC: "Do you think Keir Starmer has made the right calls in this war?" Tucker Carlson: "I don't think Keir Starmer makes any calls about anything." "I mean, Keir Starmer's not in charge of Britain, obviously. Keir Starmer is every bit as enslaved as Donald Trump is."
2:40

Tucker Carlson: "I feel sorry for [Donald Trump], as I do for all slaves." The BBC: "So are you saying he's a slave to Benjamin Netanyahu?" Tucker Carlson: "You could summarise it that way and you wouldn't be totally inaccurate." The BBC: "Do you think Keir Starmer has made the right calls in this war?" Tucker Carlson: "I don't think Keir Starmer makes any calls about anything." "I mean, Keir Starmer's not in charge of Britain, obviously. Keir Starmer is every bit as enslaved as Donald Trump is."

Wide Awake Media

57,272 views • 4 months ago

🚨Tucker Carlson, in a NEW INTERVIEW, contradicts Candace Owens and says he believes Tyler Robinson is the shooter. It doesn't end there... His theory? That Robinson was allegedly plucked from an online comment section and unknowingly brainwashed into killing Charlie Kirk - by, or on behalf of, Israel. Or something. Tucker says he's ENRAGED that this line of inquiry isn't being pursued, just as he claims to be enraged by the Butler assassination investigation. Yet Tucker still hasn't released the text messages with Dan Bongino that he claims prove a Butler cover-up because, in his own words, "I don't want to." Much like his claims about the Butler assassination, Tucker's theory about Tyler Robinson appears to be based on zero evidence.
1:42

🚨Tucker Carlson, in a NEW INTERVIEW, contradicts Candace Owens and says he believes Tyler Robinson is the shooter. It doesn't end there... His theory? That Robinson was allegedly plucked from an online comment section and unknowingly brainwashed into killing Charlie Kirk - by, or on behalf of, Israel. Or something. Tucker says he's ENRAGED that this line of inquiry isn't being pursued, just as he claims to be enraged by the Butler assassination investigation. Yet Tucker still hasn't released the text messages with Dan Bongino that he claims prove a Butler cover-up because, in his own words, "I don't want to." Much like his claims about the Butler assassination, Tucker's theory about Tyler Robinson appears to be based on zero evidence.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

208,060 views • 1 month ago

I think this single clip holds the key to understanding the entire Tucker Carlson arc. He's saying that going to war with Iran was his line in the sand. When that line was crossed he, much like a BPD art ho, made it his entire project to destroy Trump, or at the very least to destroy those who had used Trump to cross the line. He's saying that in a way that his retaliation against the line crossing gave him newfound purpose; a project for life. I think he's also admitting something deeper here--that this is how Tucker thinks and operates. He has a few big bright lines. If you cross one of them, he is going to spend every waking second figuring out how to retaliate. This sort of vindictive passion is surely the key to his success. It's Michael Jordan-esque--he uses fury at those who've insulted him or hurt him as fuel. At some level you gotta respect it. I think the deeper story is less about Iran and more that Tucker squarely blames Israel for taking his job away. Tucker loved that job. It's how he satisfied his massive, titanic ambition. Any compromise was worth it so he could hang on to that job. He's said as much in many of his recent interviews. Israel unfairly took that job away. And so Tucker made a deal with himself. I'm going to spend the rest of my life destroying the people who did that to me. And it gave him a project, a thing, in the absence of the job, that drove him to work day after day. And it is proof that if you go around messing with people's livelihoods, eventually you're going to mess with the wrong person. Similar also to Kanye. It's funny, however, that he's also admitting how impotent he, as a person in the media, was to stopping the war. He says this like it's a new realization; that it didn't matter how many threats he made, the war happened anyway. And while I do think he has, in a way, gotten his revenge on Israel in terms of public perception, I think he's also admitting that our new media environment with so called "independent voices" going against regime sponsored ones, is turning out to be pretty much the same as the old one. Like in that one, right wing voices have big, lucrative audiences, but very little power. Meanwhile, the Dems are outwardly and totally abandoning Israel, and that will have far more serious consequences than Tucker could dream.
1:10

I think this single clip holds the key to understanding the entire Tucker Carlson arc. He's saying that going to war with Iran was his line in the sand. When that line was crossed he, much like a BPD art ho, made it his entire project to destroy Trump, or at the very least to destroy those who had used Trump to cross the line. He's saying that in a way that his retaliation against the line crossing gave him newfound purpose; a project for life. I think he's also admitting something deeper here--that this is how Tucker thinks and operates. He has a few big bright lines. If you cross one of them, he is going to spend every waking second figuring out how to retaliate. This sort of vindictive passion is surely the key to his success. It's Michael Jordan-esque--he uses fury at those who've insulted him or hurt him as fuel. At some level you gotta respect it. I think the deeper story is less about Iran and more that Tucker squarely blames Israel for taking his job away. Tucker loved that job. It's how he satisfied his massive, titanic ambition. Any compromise was worth it so he could hang on to that job. He's said as much in many of his recent interviews. Israel unfairly took that job away. And so Tucker made a deal with himself. I'm going to spend the rest of my life destroying the people who did that to me. And it gave him a project, a thing, in the absence of the job, that drove him to work day after day. And it is proof that if you go around messing with people's livelihoods, eventually you're going to mess with the wrong person. Similar also to Kanye. It's funny, however, that he's also admitting how impotent he, as a person in the media, was to stopping the war. He says this like it's a new realization; that it didn't matter how many threats he made, the war happened anyway. And while I do think he has, in a way, gotten his revenge on Israel in terms of public perception, I think he's also admitting that our new media environment with so called "independent voices" going against regime sponsored ones, is turning out to be pretty much the same as the old one. Like in that one, right wing voices have big, lucrative audiences, but very little power. Meanwhile, the Dems are outwardly and totally abandoning Israel, and that will have far more serious consequences than Tucker could dream.

Disgraced Propagandist

27,489 views • 18 days ago