正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Tucker Carlson was shocked when a hacker turned an ordinary light bulb into a device capable of spying on a Wi-Fi network. Ryan Montgomery: He took a regular bulb off of Amazon, it’s called uh Wyze. Like, and then he made a bunch of different ones. So, like you...

0xRuzy's profile picture

Ruzy.hl

11,488 subscribers

671,031 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Here is a video from when I got my Shelby electric incandescent light bulb from 1901 this is the same type of bulb as the centennial bulb which has been constantly burning since 1901 in Livermore California the filament in this bulb is made of carbon and it is 5 times thicker than modern filament. Hearing that the incandescent is about to be or already has been phased out because of inefficiency reminds me of this video and the Shelby light bulb these were made to last forever and a bulb that lasts forever will not be thrown away and the materials will still be in use vs a modern incandescent or light bulb where the materials are just thrown out never to be seen again. Enjoy 🙂
4:08

Here is a video from when I got my Shelby electric incandescent light bulb from 1901 this is the same type of bulb as the centennial bulb which has been constantly burning since 1901 in Livermore California the filament in this bulb is made of carbon and it is 5 times thicker than modern filament. Hearing that the incandescent is about to be or already has been phased out because of inefficiency reminds me of this video and the Shelby light bulb these were made to last forever and a bulb that lasts forever will not be thrown away and the materials will still be in use vs a modern incandescent or light bulb where the materials are just thrown out never to be seen again. Enjoy 🙂

dr.parkinstine

424,744 次观看 • 2 年前

You noticed the bulb in the bathroom was out and finally go change it to find the bulb wasn’t even in the receptacle. Upon further inspection you see that there is a camera in its place. Their sends you into a rage, everyone uses this shower and this camera could have been used to peep in on anyone. How do you proceed to get to the bottom of things?
0:26

Sensitive content

You noticed the bulb in the bathroom was out and finally go change it to find the bulb wasn’t even in the receptacle. Upon further inspection you see that there is a camera in its place. Their sends you into a rage, everyone uses this shower and this camera could have been used to peep in on anyone. How do you proceed to get to the bottom of things?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

155,564 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.
18:38

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.

Jacktron

34,932 次观看 • 4 个月前

TUCKER CARLSON: “I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks are like way better than Warren Buffett’s. How does that happen? Does anyone ever talk about that internally, like on the hill?” TULSI GABBARD: “No, because most of them benefit from it ... No member of Congress or the Senate or their spouse or their senior staff should be allowed to trade in stocks, period, full stop ... There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses. TUCKER CARLSON: “That’s a no-brainer to me.” TULSI GABBARD: “It’s just common sense that we have people in great positions of power. Why should they be forced to do something (not trade stocks while serving) with the passage of a law? Why don’t they just do the right thing and say, you know what, we get that even an innocent thing could be perceived as insider trading? We’re just not going to go there.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Because it’s too lucrative to give up.” TULSI GABBARD: “And they know they can get away with it.”
3:29

TUCKER CARLSON: “I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks are like way better than Warren Buffett’s. How does that happen? Does anyone ever talk about that internally, like on the hill?” TULSI GABBARD: “No, because most of them benefit from it ... No member of Congress or the Senate or their spouse or their senior staff should be allowed to trade in stocks, period, full stop ... There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses. TUCKER CARLSON: “That’s a no-brainer to me.” TULSI GABBARD: “It’s just common sense that we have people in great positions of power. Why should they be forced to do something (not trade stocks while serving) with the passage of a law? Why don’t they just do the right thing and say, you know what, we get that even an innocent thing could be perceived as insider trading? We’re just not going to go there.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Because it’s too lucrative to give up.” TULSI GABBARD: “And they know they can get away with it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,072,821 次观看 • 2 年前

This guy is over it with all the unnecessary apps and “smart” everything. He bought a light bulb that wants him to download an app just to turn it on. Then he goes off about appliances that beep like they just landed on the moon, fridges with iPad screens, and how ridiculous passwords have gotten. He’s basically saying we’ve overcomplicated everything for no reason. A lot of people are feeling this way lately. Do you think we’ve gone too far with smart technology and apps, or do you like having everything connected? I think it's gotten out of control as well.
1:43

This guy is over it with all the unnecessary apps and “smart” everything. He bought a light bulb that wants him to download an app just to turn it on. Then he goes off about appliances that beep like they just landed on the moon, fridges with iPad screens, and how ridiculous passwords have gotten. He’s basically saying we’ve overcomplicated everything for no reason. A lot of people are feeling this way lately. Do you think we’ve gone too far with smart technology and apps, or do you like having everything connected? I think it's gotten out of control as well.

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

25,630 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tucker Carlson to Sam Altman: I spoke to someone who's involved at scale of the development of the technology who said they lie. Have you ever seen that? Sam Altman: They hallucinate all the time, yeah. Or, not all the time, they used to hallucinate all the time. They now hallucinate a little bit. Tucker Carlson: What does that mean? What's the distinction between hallucinating and lying? Sam Altman: If you ask, again, this has gotten much better, but in the early days, if you asked, you know, what... in what year was President, the made up name, President Tucker Carlson of the United States born? Tucker Carlson: Mhm. Sam Altman: What it should say is, "I don't think Tucker Carlson was ever President of the United States," right? But because of the way they were trained, that was not the most likely response in the training data, so it would assume like, oh, um, you know, I don't know that there wasn't... the user has told me there was President Tucker Carlson, so I'll make my best guess at a number. And we figured out how to mostly train that out. There are still examples of this problem, but it is... I think it is something we will get fully solved, and we've already made, you know, in a GPT-5 era, a huge amount of progress towards that.
2:48

Tucker Carlson to Sam Altman: I spoke to someone who's involved at scale of the development of the technology who said they lie. Have you ever seen that? Sam Altman: They hallucinate all the time, yeah. Or, not all the time, they used to hallucinate all the time. They now hallucinate a little bit. Tucker Carlson: What does that mean? What's the distinction between hallucinating and lying? Sam Altman: If you ask, again, this has gotten much better, but in the early days, if you asked, you know, what... in what year was President, the made up name, President Tucker Carlson of the United States born? Tucker Carlson: Mhm. Sam Altman: What it should say is, "I don't think Tucker Carlson was ever President of the United States," right? But because of the way they were trained, that was not the most likely response in the training data, so it would assume like, oh, um, you know, I don't know that there wasn't... the user has told me there was President Tucker Carlson, so I'll make my best guess at a number. And we figured out how to mostly train that out. There are still examples of this problem, but it is... I think it is something we will get fully solved, and we've already made, you know, in a GPT-5 era, a huge amount of progress towards that.

Ruzy.hl

73,932 次观看 • 1 个月前

Beware, with allot of these newer cars that have the LED headlamps. Not only are they allot of work to remove, but the dealer doesn’t tell you that it’s not serviceable. Before, if a bulb went out, you could go and get one for less than $100 especially if you have the HID lights or halogen. With LED, you have to replace the whole headlamp if the light ever goes out. Would you pay the $1000-$5000 for a new headlamp or would you just say screw it, time to trade it in.
2:46

Beware, with allot of these newer cars that have the LED headlamps. Not only are they allot of work to remove, but the dealer doesn’t tell you that it’s not serviceable. Before, if a bulb went out, you could go and get one for less than $100 especially if you have the HID lights or halogen. With LED, you have to replace the whole headlamp if the light ever goes out. Would you pay the $1000-$5000 for a new headlamp or would you just say screw it, time to trade it in.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,272,770 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨Watch Donald Trump Jr. recount to Tucker Carlson how he used all of his political capital to help JD Vance get chosen as President Trump's Vice President. This was one of the most important moments of the 2024 campaign and will ensure the America First movement has an amazing successor: Donald Trump Jr: “You have a JD Vance — who in all fairness I think I should probably get a little credit for. Just taking on the billionaire donor class that wanted their puppet VP.” Tucker Carlson: “If only people knew how much credit you deserve for that. That was heroic.” Donald Trump Jr. “I don’t ask for much but I was all in on that.” Tucker Carlson: “That story will never be written but that was one of the great moments in any politics I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen a lot of politics.” Donald Trump Jr.: “I exerted 10,000% of my political capital — I may get a favor from my father in like 2076. I used it all. But it was great after the debate.” Tucker Carlson: “And it actually worked out, he turned out to be amazing.” Donald Trump Jr.: “Listen, if I go all in it’s usually I feel really strong — I don’t go all in often. There’s not a lot of things, I’m sort of different. I’ll work around some of the bad stuff. This was one that was really important.” Tucker Carlson: “But there have been no hiccups.” Donald Trump Jr.: “I’ve had a lot of these Republican donor class people come up to me — which is really stupid of them — but they’re like ‘you know Don, I was MFing you for like 3 weeks about that decision because I really wanted X,Y,Z to be VP’…but they’re like, ‘you were right.’ The only one that mattered — it was after the VP debate…I had like 12 missed calls from my dad. That’s usually not great. And he just gets on the phone and he goes, ‘you know Don, you know I did that for you Don but that was a 10.’ A huge win in Trumpworld is like a 6.”
4:13

🚨Watch Donald Trump Jr. recount to Tucker Carlson how he used all of his political capital to help JD Vance get chosen as President Trump's Vice President. This was one of the most important moments of the 2024 campaign and will ensure the America First movement has an amazing successor: Donald Trump Jr: “You have a JD Vance — who in all fairness I think I should probably get a little credit for. Just taking on the billionaire donor class that wanted their puppet VP.” Tucker Carlson: “If only people knew how much credit you deserve for that. That was heroic.” Donald Trump Jr. “I don’t ask for much but I was all in on that.” Tucker Carlson: “That story will never be written but that was one of the great moments in any politics I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen a lot of politics.” Donald Trump Jr.: “I exerted 10,000% of my political capital — I may get a favor from my father in like 2076. I used it all. But it was great after the debate.” Tucker Carlson: “And it actually worked out, he turned out to be amazing.” Donald Trump Jr.: “Listen, if I go all in it’s usually I feel really strong — I don’t go all in often. There’s not a lot of things, I’m sort of different. I’ll work around some of the bad stuff. This was one that was really important.” Tucker Carlson: “But there have been no hiccups.” Donald Trump Jr.: “I’ve had a lot of these Republican donor class people come up to me — which is really stupid of them — but they’re like ‘you know Don, I was MFing you for like 3 weeks about that decision because I really wanted X,Y,Z to be VP’…but they’re like, ‘you were right.’ The only one that mattered — it was after the VP debate…I had like 12 missed calls from my dad. That’s usually not great. And he just gets on the phone and he goes, ‘you know Don, you know I did that for you Don but that was a 10.’ A huge win in Trumpworld is like a 6.”

Steve Cortes

412,169 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: Trump says Tucker called him to apologize over opposition—claims even Tucker agrees Iran can’t have nukes. “Tucker’s a nice guy.” “He called and apologized the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong.” “And I appreciated that.” “If they think that it’s okay for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, then they should oppose me—but nobody thinks it’s okay.” “I don’t think Tucker says it’s okay.” “I did ask Tucker, I said, are you okay with nuclear weapons being in the hands of Iran? And he sort of didn’t like that! He sorta didn’t like that.” “And I said, well, if it’s okay with you, then you and I have a difference. But it’s really not okay with him.”
2:11

BREAKING: Trump says Tucker called him to apologize over opposition—claims even Tucker agrees Iran can’t have nukes. “Tucker’s a nice guy.” “He called and apologized the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong.” “And I appreciated that.” “If they think that it’s okay for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, then they should oppose me—but nobody thinks it’s okay.” “I don’t think Tucker says it’s okay.” “I did ask Tucker, I said, are you okay with nuclear weapons being in the hands of Iran? And he sort of didn’t like that! He sorta didn’t like that.” “And I said, well, if it’s okay with you, then you and I have a difference. But it’s really not okay with him.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

523,890 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 TUCKER CARLSON EXPRESSES GRATITUDE FOR 𝕏 and Elon Musk TUCKER: "Really grateful to be living in this super cool historical moment where this billionaire decides, hey, I like free speech. I'm going to make it possible for people I've never met, like, who does that? Well, he did that. Whatever you think of Elon, and maybe you disagree with this or disagree with that or whatever you think of the guy, he did indisputably do that. And it's kind of without parallel in history, like, who's ever done anything like that? And so I'm grateful. I mean it." 🚨SPACE LIVE NOW with Tucker Carlson, Patrick Bet-David, Candice Owens, Tristan Tate, Charlie Kirk
0:27

🚨 TUCKER CARLSON EXPRESSES GRATITUDE FOR 𝕏 and Elon Musk TUCKER: "Really grateful to be living in this super cool historical moment where this billionaire decides, hey, I like free speech. I'm going to make it possible for people I've never met, like, who does that? Well, he did that. Whatever you think of Elon, and maybe you disagree with this or disagree with that or whatever you think of the guy, he did indisputably do that. And it's kind of without parallel in history, like, who's ever done anything like that? And so I'm grateful. I mean it." 🚨SPACE LIVE NOW with Tucker Carlson, Patrick Bet-David, Candice Owens, Tristan Tate, Charlie Kirk

Mario Nawfal

462,831 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk on local AI in Tesla Optimus: “Well, we think we can put a lot of intelligence locally in the robot and it certainly needs to be enough intelligence that if the robot gets disconnected, like if it's a bad cellular signal or there isn't Wi-Fi, you know, Optimus can't just get stuck. It needs to have enough local intelligence that it can still do useful things, even if it loses the connection, kind of like the car. The car does not need any cellular or Wi-Fi connection to be able to drive safely. Now, I guess you can think of like Optimus needs kind of a manager to tell it what to do, broadly speaking, like if otherwise it's going to keep doing the same thing it did before. so you know i think you need kind of a an orchestration ai which uh you know grok would be good for orchestration um and and then for you know for optimist's voice you know having um a low latency intelligent voice ai grok is actually very good for that so if you when I talk to Optimus and have kind of a you know, a Grok level conversation you kind of need to connect to a Grok level AI for that. But I would expect the amount of interaction apart from like the voice stuff and asking complicated questions of the robot that necessarily needs a large AI model to answer the Gronk would probably have about as much interaction with Optimus as a manager would have with the people on their team. “
2:02

Elon Musk on local AI in Tesla Optimus: “Well, we think we can put a lot of intelligence locally in the robot and it certainly needs to be enough intelligence that if the robot gets disconnected, like if it's a bad cellular signal or there isn't Wi-Fi, you know, Optimus can't just get stuck. It needs to have enough local intelligence that it can still do useful things, even if it loses the connection, kind of like the car. The car does not need any cellular or Wi-Fi connection to be able to drive safely. Now, I guess you can think of like Optimus needs kind of a manager to tell it what to do, broadly speaking, like if otherwise it's going to keep doing the same thing it did before. so you know i think you need kind of a an orchestration ai which uh you know grok would be good for orchestration um and and then for you know for optimist's voice you know having um a low latency intelligent voice ai grok is actually very good for that so if you when I talk to Optimus and have kind of a you know, a Grok level conversation you kind of need to connect to a Grok level AI for that. But I would expect the amount of interaction apart from like the voice stuff and asking complicated questions of the robot that necessarily needs a large AI model to answer the Gronk would probably have about as much interaction with Optimus as a manager would have with the people on their team. “

Brian Roemmele

26,664 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."
1:03

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."

Eric Daugherty

304,495 次观看 • 4 个月前

DISGUSTING: Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan giggle about Lindsey Graham dying, boasting he “liked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet,” and spent one of his final days on Earth in Ukraine holding a drone that looks like “a black c***”... WELCH: I want to watch the wall-to-wall coverage of this. Like, this is great. [SULLIVAN LAUGHING] And then there was this photo that I saw online. This is the last known photograph that Lady Graham took because, you know, he had just been in the Ukraine. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: And so, he took a photograph with a drone. Kiley, pop this up. Okay, for those of you that are listening, Okay, this drone looks like a big giant black c***. SULLIVAN: It does. WELCH: All right, there’s just no other way around it. He is smiling from ear to ear. He is holding the black c***, and the interesting thing about this drone is it’s called the P1 Sun, and it’s like — SULLIVAN: P1! WELCH: — in Russian, it means they call it the p***. This drone is called the p***. SULLIVAN: What? WELCH: And so, this is the shit with, I cannot believe, like, you know, back in the day, would watch movies or shows, and you would think, oh, that’s so crazy, like, about the president or about the United States. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: Like that — that’s crazy. I’m so glad that would never happen. We’re living in the time period. We’re like, that’s from — that’s from an episode of Veep. SULLIVAN: For sure, yeah. WELCH: That’s an episode of Veep in the Lindsey Graham. Holding a big giant black c*** that is called p*** in Russian. And that’s his last known photograph before he dies. SULLIVAN: If I saw that on Veep, I would think that’s hilarious, but that would never happen. I mean, you just would never think that would actually happen. First of all, who names drones p***? WELCH: Well, when they look like black c***s, I think you do. SULLIVAN: I guess you do. WELCH: I think that’s really not even that creative. When you look at what that drone looked like, I mean, I think c*** or p***. SULLIVAN: No, it just looks like a p***. It does. WELCH: Yeah. And look at how happy Lindsey is. SULLIVAN: Well, we know why Lindsey’s so happy. WELCH: He died after he was groping a — a p*** — a black c*** that was made for mass destruction. SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: This is like exactly what he was. There’s one photograph that just completely consolidates exactly who he was. He liked c***, as we all know — SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: — you know, the worst-kept secret in Washington, D.C. and he liked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet, and there he is with a black c*** that kills right before he dies. SULLIVAN: I mean, that could not be a better epitaph right there, that picture.
2:35

DISGUSTING: Jennifer Welch and Angie Sullivan giggle about Lindsey Graham dying, boasting he “liked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet,” and spent one of his final days on Earth in Ukraine holding a drone that looks like “a black c***”... WELCH: I want to watch the wall-to-wall coverage of this. Like, this is great. [SULLIVAN LAUGHING] And then there was this photo that I saw online. This is the last known photograph that Lady Graham took because, you know, he had just been in the Ukraine. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: And so, he took a photograph with a drone. Kiley, pop this up. Okay, for those of you that are listening, Okay, this drone looks like a big giant black c***. SULLIVAN: It does. WELCH: All right, there’s just no other way around it. He is smiling from ear to ear. He is holding the black c***, and the interesting thing about this drone is it’s called the P1 Sun, and it’s like — SULLIVAN: P1! WELCH: — in Russian, it means they call it the p***. This drone is called the p***. SULLIVAN: What? WELCH: And so, this is the shit with, I cannot believe, like, you know, back in the day, would watch movies or shows, and you would think, oh, that’s so crazy, like, about the president or about the United States. SULLIVAN: Right. WELCH: Like that — that’s crazy. I’m so glad that would never happen. We’re living in the time period. We’re like, that’s from — that’s from an episode of Veep. SULLIVAN: For sure, yeah. WELCH: That’s an episode of Veep in the Lindsey Graham. Holding a big giant black c*** that is called p*** in Russian. And that’s his last known photograph before he dies. SULLIVAN: If I saw that on Veep, I would think that’s hilarious, but that would never happen. I mean, you just would never think that would actually happen. First of all, who names drones p***? WELCH: Well, when they look like black c***s, I think you do. SULLIVAN: I guess you do. WELCH: I think that’s really not even that creative. When you look at what that drone looked like, I mean, I think c*** or p***. SULLIVAN: No, it just looks like a p***. It does. WELCH: Yeah. And look at how happy Lindsey is. SULLIVAN: Well, we know why Lindsey’s so happy. WELCH: He died after he was groping a — a p*** — a black c*** that was made for mass destruction. SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: This is like exactly what he was. There’s one photograph that just completely consolidates exactly who he was. He liked c***, as we all know — SULLIVAN: Yeah. WELCH: — you know, the worst-kept secret in Washington, D.C. and he liked killing, you know, the biggest war hawk on the planet, and there he is with a black c*** that kills right before he dies. SULLIVAN: I mean, that could not be a better epitaph right there, that picture.

Curtis Houck

17,969 次观看 • 15 天前

Bill Maher on Joe Kent resigning from his position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center: “He’s been listening to much Tucker Carlson. It’s, you know, the Jews made us do it. It’s just another version of anti-Semitism.” “First it was Bibi Derangement Syndrome, then it was they’re colonizers and genocide, which it wasn’t.” “All these other reasons like you can’t have a state in the world based on religion even though there are like 46 Muslim countries that are based on religion. Some have the name right in the title of the country.” “Now the big answer is, no, Israel made us do it. We’re Israel’s b*tch. I don’t think we’re Israel’s b*tch. I think we’re Israel’s ally.” “If I have to be on one side of this MAGA thing, either Trump or Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes, I’ll be with Trump on this one because that’s the other side of MAGA.”
1:06

Bill Maher on Joe Kent resigning from his position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center: “He’s been listening to much Tucker Carlson. It’s, you know, the Jews made us do it. It’s just another version of anti-Semitism.” “First it was Bibi Derangement Syndrome, then it was they’re colonizers and genocide, which it wasn’t.” “All these other reasons like you can’t have a state in the world based on religion even though there are like 46 Muslim countries that are based on religion. Some have the name right in the title of the country.” “Now the big answer is, no, Israel made us do it. We’re Israel’s b*tch. I don’t think we’re Israel’s b*tch. I think we’re Israel’s ally.” “If I have to be on one side of this MAGA thing, either Trump or Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes, I’ll be with Trump on this one because that’s the other side of MAGA.”

RedWave Press

63,250 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chris Camillo explains why investing is the only real path to generational wealth for regular people “I know what it’s like to have a regular job and to be capped. Don’t get me wrong at my regular job I was making a ton of money, like $250,000 a year but that was not enough for me. I was still capped” “I was like I either gotta go get some other random job and maybe it’s better or maybe it’s worse but I’m not going any higher in this job” “A lot of people are in that scenario but they’re capped at like $50K, $80K, $90K or $100K and they will never make more money than that, ever, for the rest of their life” “There’s only one way out” “If you’re a regular person with a regular job, the only crack that you have of building generational wealth is to come to terms with the fact that you can be a great investor” “By the way, you can just do it on the side and you can have fun with it. You don’t have to work with technicals. You don’t have to be this pedigreed Wharton grad. You don’t have to understand finance at all, especially in the day of AI” “All you have to do is figure out how to observe the world around you and connect the dots of change to companies that are either benefiting or being harmed by the change you see happening in the world around you”
1:35

Chris Camillo explains why investing is the only real path to generational wealth for regular people “I know what it’s like to have a regular job and to be capped. Don’t get me wrong at my regular job I was making a ton of money, like $250,000 a year but that was not enough for me. I was still capped” “I was like I either gotta go get some other random job and maybe it’s better or maybe it’s worse but I’m not going any higher in this job” “A lot of people are in that scenario but they’re capped at like $50K, $80K, $90K or $100K and they will never make more money than that, ever, for the rest of their life” “There’s only one way out” “If you’re a regular person with a regular job, the only crack that you have of building generational wealth is to come to terms with the fact that you can be a great investor” “By the way, you can just do it on the side and you can have fun with it. You don’t have to work with technicals. You don’t have to be this pedigreed Wharton grad. You don’t have to understand finance at all, especially in the day of AI” “All you have to do is figure out how to observe the world around you and connect the dots of change to companies that are either benefiting or being harmed by the change you see happening in the world around you”

Jack

60,910 次观看 • 2 个月前

Remote Viewer Sounds Alarm on Future Political Crisis Remote Viewer, Nyiam, looked at the future U.S. president of 2030, and saw a MAJOR psyop campaign meant to manipulate the mass population: "I see a motorcade moving. So my assumption here is some people involved with this target move in a motorcade. They don't travel alone. They have a security detail. You know, they're chauffeured around. They have an itinerary they're following. They're meeting with high level people. Law enforcement would be at the scene or aware that they're going somewhere." "And it reminded me of, like, when, you know, and all the leaders, like, go to the G7 or the G8, whatever it is now, GS six, 7 or 8, whatever number it's at right now. It's like that, like, oh, all these important people are coming somewhere and, you know, everyone can see that. Like, oh, here comes the motorcade." "I see, stage an audience, watching this. It's like, you know, podium people on stage type event here. It does have an official governmental feel. And it feels like a warning or a projection, foretelling. So, like they're saying, hey, something's going to happen or this is happening, and it does feel like a kind of desperate measures." "Last straw, mood to it. Like, you know, bad news. Like we're gonna have to make some compromises. You know, people aren't going to be happy to hear this kind of announcement." "I see, could be a courtroom. It does have, judges and jury kind of mood to it. You know, there's people sitting here, there's some other people seated. It has a debate or crisis management theme to it. I get the idea of an uprising and the idea of implementing controls in an emergency situation, almost like the lockdowns." "You know what I mean? Like they're talking like, oh, this happened. So in this situation, we're going to have to do something that we don't usually do, like, like a lockdown or an emergency measures type, discussion or maybe approval or something like that." "It does feel very panicked and rushed. It's like, figure it out. Fluid situation scrambling quickly reacting again. The idea of moving groups or swapping or changing, people or assets. And when I say assets, I'm feeling like it's more like people, like relocating them or switching them their positions, switching someone's positions. Sudden change is very reactionary." "It's a very much like an oh sh*t kind of moment. There's this feeling I get with this", "...something's getting out of control, and it does feel like putting a lid on it, putting the fire out, stunting its growth, you know, trapping it in and blocking it and preventing it." "All that, all that kind of stuff, applying the pressure. And it has a walls closing in kind of feel to it, like setting up boundaries or putting up walls or defenses to prevent or stifle something from happening, hurting the sheep. That was the kind of last impression I had. There." "...Changing something up that you not supposed to change. You know, the whole idea of reorganizing or shifting or swapping or moving something or someone. And it does have, like a, you know, legalities kind of feel to it. Maybe the precedence has something to do with it, like, a very rare and unusual type response that this triggers,"
4:50

Remote Viewer Sounds Alarm on Future Political Crisis Remote Viewer, Nyiam, looked at the future U.S. president of 2030, and saw a MAJOR psyop campaign meant to manipulate the mass population: "I see a motorcade moving. So my assumption here is some people involved with this target move in a motorcade. They don't travel alone. They have a security detail. You know, they're chauffeured around. They have an itinerary they're following. They're meeting with high level people. Law enforcement would be at the scene or aware that they're going somewhere." "And it reminded me of, like, when, you know, and all the leaders, like, go to the G7 or the G8, whatever it is now, GS six, 7 or 8, whatever number it's at right now. It's like that, like, oh, all these important people are coming somewhere and, you know, everyone can see that. Like, oh, here comes the motorcade." "I see, stage an audience, watching this. It's like, you know, podium people on stage type event here. It does have an official governmental feel. And it feels like a warning or a projection, foretelling. So, like they're saying, hey, something's going to happen or this is happening, and it does feel like a kind of desperate measures." "Last straw, mood to it. Like, you know, bad news. Like we're gonna have to make some compromises. You know, people aren't going to be happy to hear this kind of announcement." "I see, could be a courtroom. It does have, judges and jury kind of mood to it. You know, there's people sitting here, there's some other people seated. It has a debate or crisis management theme to it. I get the idea of an uprising and the idea of implementing controls in an emergency situation, almost like the lockdowns." "You know what I mean? Like they're talking like, oh, this happened. So in this situation, we're going to have to do something that we don't usually do, like, like a lockdown or an emergency measures type, discussion or maybe approval or something like that." "It does feel very panicked and rushed. It's like, figure it out. Fluid situation scrambling quickly reacting again. The idea of moving groups or swapping or changing, people or assets. And when I say assets, I'm feeling like it's more like people, like relocating them or switching them their positions, switching someone's positions. Sudden change is very reactionary." "It's a very much like an oh sh*t kind of moment. There's this feeling I get with this", "...something's getting out of control, and it does feel like putting a lid on it, putting the fire out, stunting its growth, you know, trapping it in and blocking it and preventing it." "All that, all that kind of stuff, applying the pressure. And it has a walls closing in kind of feel to it, like setting up boundaries or putting up walls or defenses to prevent or stifle something from happening, hurting the sheep. That was the kind of last impression I had. There." "...Changing something up that you not supposed to change. You know, the whole idea of reorganizing or shifting or swapping or moving something or someone. And it does have, like a, you know, legalities kind of feel to it. Maybe the precedence has something to do with it, like, a very rare and unusual type response that this triggers,"

Future Forecasting Group

17,614 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trump: And so it's one of those things I was saying before though, that, you know, I do a thing called the weave, and there are those that are fair that say this guy is so genius, and then others would say, oh, he rambled. I don't ramble. I saw a story. What you do is you weave things in, you do it. You have to have certain things you need, you need an extraordinary memory because you have to come back to where you started. The weave is good if you come back. I can go so far here or there and I can come back to exactly where I started
0:35

Trump: And so it's one of those things I was saying before though, that, you know, I do a thing called the weave, and there are those that are fair that say this guy is so genius, and then others would say, oh, he rambled. I don't ramble. I saw a story. What you do is you weave things in, you do it. You have to have certain things you need, you need an extraordinary memory because you have to come back to where you started. The weave is good if you come back. I can go so far here or there and I can come back to exactly where I started

Headquarters

287,441 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson reportedly spotted in Moscow, Russia as speculation swirls that he will be interviewing Vladimir Putin. Carlson said he previously planned on interviewing Putin until he found out the U.S. government was spying on him. "The NSA broke into my signal account, which I didn't know they could do," he previously said. '"I got a call from somebody in Washington. This person said: 'Are you gonna come to Washington anytime soon?' Yeah. Actually, I'm gonna be up in a week, meet me Sunday morning." "So I go, and this person's like: 'Are you planning a trip to go see Putin?' And I was like, 'how would you know that?' I haven't told anybody. I mean anybody. Not my brother. Not my wife, nobody." "How would you know that? 'Because NSA pulled your text with this other person you were texting.'" Good for him.
0:29

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson reportedly spotted in Moscow, Russia as speculation swirls that he will be interviewing Vladimir Putin. Carlson said he previously planned on interviewing Putin until he found out the U.S. government was spying on him. "The NSA broke into my signal account, which I didn't know they could do," he previously said. '"I got a call from somebody in Washington. This person said: 'Are you gonna come to Washington anytime soon?' Yeah. Actually, I'm gonna be up in a week, meet me Sunday morning." "So I go, and this person's like: 'Are you planning a trip to go see Putin?' And I was like, 'how would you know that?' I haven't told anybody. I mean anybody. Not my brother. Not my wife, nobody." "How would you know that? 'Because NSA pulled your text with this other person you were texting.'" Good for him.

Collin Rugg

5,732,379 次观看 • 2 年前