Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Instead of using an AI interface placeholder, why not let us choose our own home screen? We could set the lobby to Layla (Timeless Capture), use any owned skin, artwork, or even a looping animated artwork as the main interface. Storage shouldn't be an issue since players can choose... show more

Otep Gaming

11,503 subscribers

18,228 views • 19 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We raised $5.5M to build an AI hardware interface that knows what you want. The world has changed: we talk to our devices, AI writes our emails, and self-driving cars pick us up. But how we interact with it all, touchscreens and keyboards, was designed for an age of browsing and searching. When we do hundreds of tasks a day, now even more with AI, every unnecessary decision, every step spent navigating instead of acting adds up to real cognitive load. We are building the Hardware Interface, designed for the age of AI. Private Pilot now open. Limited spots.

We raised $5.5M to build an AI hardware interface that knows what you want. The world has changed: we talk to our devices, AI writes our emails, and self-driving cars pick us up. But how we interact with it all, touchscreens and keyboards, was designed for an age of browsing and searching. When we do hundreds of tasks a day, now even more with AI, every unnecessary decision, every step spent navigating instead of acting adds up to real cognitive load. We are building the Hardware Interface, designed for the age of AI. Private Pilot now open. Limited spots.

Apoorv Shankar

1,829,222 views • 27 days ago

The “everything palette” has been in the back of my mind for years. I feel that, when correctly automated, it demonstrates an important property of a GUI system, which is an internal interface represented structurally (a common substrate by which all higher level interfaces communicate), and several projections of that interface to higher level interfaces (GUIs, CLIs, hotkeys), such that the internal interface is not substantially duplicated in the projections themselves. Thus, small changes in the internal interface representation immediately and automatically reflect in all such projections. All information for a new setting, for example, is simply expressed in one location, and all interfaces which could access that setting immediately can do so. That setting is automatically accessible in the associated right-click menus, the CLI, hotkeys, and the everything palette. This is because those higher level interfaces are truly *projections* of the underlying interface—they are driven using, in effect, type information of the underlying interface, rather than being special cased to the particulars of the interface (and thus needing to be extensively updated any time the internal interface is changed). The need for this in UI programming is usually first encountered with hotkeys. You write some user interface, and now you need to associate hotkeys—an entirely separate (physical) interface—with the same functionality that your software user interface exposes. You can implement this by, in effect, duplicating the internal interface in both a hotkeys path, and a GUI path. But this is far from ideal for obvious reasons. The debugger by nature enforces this design constraint (GUIs and hotkeys), along with many others, and so it pushed me to follow this to its natural conclusion. A debugger needs to offer an IPC CLI interface for the same commands and features that the main program does. Data in the debugger is already projected in a wide variety of ways—breakpoints can show up in a source view, a disassembly view, a memory view, and a breakpoints list view. My work on the RADDBG visualization engine (driven ultimately by the “watch window” interface—at its limit, a general sparse tree viewer/editor) pushed this even further—you want interfaces to be available through a watch tree evaluation language, as well as several GUIs, and the CLI, and hotkeys. I’ve now finally got the internal systems to the point where they are roughly satisfying all these constraints, and this made the “everything palette” a very simple and natural extension to the system.

The “everything palette” has been in the back of my mind for years. I feel that, when correctly automated, it demonstrates an important property of a GUI system, which is an internal interface represented structurally (a common substrate by which all higher level interfaces communicate), and several projections of that interface to higher level interfaces (GUIs, CLIs, hotkeys), such that the internal interface is not substantially duplicated in the projections themselves. Thus, small changes in the internal interface representation immediately and automatically reflect in all such projections. All information for a new setting, for example, is simply expressed in one location, and all interfaces which could access that setting immediately can do so. That setting is automatically accessible in the associated right-click menus, the CLI, hotkeys, and the everything palette. This is because those higher level interfaces are truly projections of the underlying interface—they are driven using, in effect, type information of the underlying interface, rather than being special cased to the particulars of the interface (and thus needing to be extensively updated any time the internal interface is changed). The need for this in UI programming is usually first encountered with hotkeys. You write some user interface, and now you need to associate hotkeys—an entirely separate (physical) interface—with the same functionality that your software user interface exposes. You can implement this by, in effect, duplicating the internal interface in both a hotkeys path, and a GUI path. But this is far from ideal for obvious reasons. The debugger by nature enforces this design constraint (GUIs and hotkeys), along with many others, and so it pushed me to follow this to its natural conclusion. A debugger needs to offer an IPC CLI interface for the same commands and features that the main program does. Data in the debugger is already projected in a wide variety of ways—breakpoints can show up in a source view, a disassembly view, a memory view, and a breakpoints list view. My work on the RADDBG visualization engine (driven ultimately by the “watch window” interface—at its limit, a general sparse tree viewer/editor) pushed this even further—you want interfaces to be available through a watch tree evaluation language, as well as several GUIs, and the CLI, and hotkeys. I’ve now finally got the internal systems to the point where they are roughly satisfying all these constraints, and this made the “everything palette” a very simple and natural extension to the system.

Ryan Fleury

22,249 views • 1 year ago

Generative AI is about to create the most addictive algorithms in human history. Spotify’s Co-President, Gustav Söderström, warns that because AI can understand you on a deeply personal level, the potential for digital addiction is massive. But AI is a dual-use technology. Instead of letting the algorithm dictate who you are, you can use it to program who you want to become. Here is the framework he breaks down: Implicit vs. Intentional: Current algorithms track what you *did*. AI allows you to explicitly tell it what you *want* to do. The English Interface: Historically, only a few million developers could dictate what computers did. Now, anyone can reprogram their digital experience using plain English. The future of tech isn't about letting AI control us it's about using AI to take back control of our own attention and habits.

Generative AI is about to create the most addictive algorithms in human history. Spotify’s Co-President, Gustav Söderström, warns that because AI can understand you on a deeply personal level, the potential for digital addiction is massive. But AI is a dual-use technology. Instead of letting the algorithm dictate who you are, you can use it to program who you want to become. Here is the framework he breaks down: Implicit vs. Intentional: Current algorithms track what you did. AI allows you to explicitly tell it what you want to do. The English Interface: Historically, only a few million developers could dictate what computers did. Now, anyone can reprogram their digital experience using plain English. The future of tech isn't about letting AI control us it's about using AI to take back control of our own attention and habits.

Block 🧱

31,343 views • 2 months ago

One of the biggest supplement brands (Resilia) right now has almost 6000 active ads. Using AI one of the main ways they reach the number of variety & quantity they are able to test. So instead of thinking if you should or shouldn't use AI in your ad account. I think the conversation should be more like this: How do we use AI to maximize the amount of diversity & quantity we can test every single week.

One of the biggest supplement brands (Resilia) right now has almost 6000 active ads. Using AI one of the main ways they reach the number of variety & quantity they are able to test. So instead of thinking if you should or shouldn't use AI in your ad account. I think the conversation should be more like this: How do we use AI to maximize the amount of diversity & quantity we can test every single week.

Lorenzo | Meta Ads & Performance Creatives 📈

16,518 views • 2 months ago

I use AI constantly. My 4 and 6 year olds even attend an AI-focused school. I am intensely optimistic about our AI future. But one thing I will fight to protect and never let AI automate: human autonomy. AI risks becoming the "autocomplete for life"—telling you the next action, job, relationship, identity. We who are living through this AI transition will be tempted, in a way that is unprecedented in human history, to let machines substitute for our self-direction. Most cognitive offloading is a genuine human triumph: writing reduced memory demands, mechanical calculation relieved us from arithmetic computation, and GPS navigation eliminated spatial reasoning from wayfinding. Each freed cognitive capacity for higher-order thinking. As Alfred North Whitehead observed, civilization advances by “extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them.” But as AI systems enter the realm of deliberation itself, something fundamentally different happens. Instead of freeing cognitive capacity for higher-order thinking, AI risks doing the choosing for us. Each small delegation of choice will seem harmless, even natural. But together, the micro-abdications of judgment could habituate you–choice by choice, day by day–to passivity and dependence. It could erode your ability to choose for yourself, from matters as trivial as what to have for breakfast, to fundamental choices about how to live well. Thankfully, AI can clearly do the opposite as well: By making learning more efficient AI can free time for self-directed exploration; as a Socratic interlocutor, it can strengthen your capacity to deliberate; through the right kind of personalization, it can help you discover and develop your unique gifts, and to use them to live autonomously and well. Let us choose to build for human autonomy...while we still remember what it means to choose. Full video with Johnathan Bi:

I use AI constantly. My 4 and 6 year olds even attend an AI-focused school. I am intensely optimistic about our AI future. But one thing I will fight to protect and never let AI automate: human autonomy. AI risks becoming the "autocomplete for life"—telling you the next action, job, relationship, identity. We who are living through this AI transition will be tempted, in a way that is unprecedented in human history, to let machines substitute for our self-direction. Most cognitive offloading is a genuine human triumph: writing reduced memory demands, mechanical calculation relieved us from arithmetic computation, and GPS navigation eliminated spatial reasoning from wayfinding. Each freed cognitive capacity for higher-order thinking. As Alfred North Whitehead observed, civilization advances by “extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them.” But as AI systems enter the realm of deliberation itself, something fundamentally different happens. Instead of freeing cognitive capacity for higher-order thinking, AI risks doing the choosing for us. Each small delegation of choice will seem harmless, even natural. But together, the micro-abdications of judgment could habituate you–choice by choice, day by day–to passivity and dependence. It could erode your ability to choose for yourself, from matters as trivial as what to have for breakfast, to fundamental choices about how to live well. Thankfully, AI can clearly do the opposite as well: By making learning more efficient AI can free time for self-directed exploration; as a Socratic interlocutor, it can strengthen your capacity to deliberate; through the right kind of personalization, it can help you discover and develop your unique gifts, and to use them to live autonomously and well. Let us choose to build for human autonomy...while we still remember what it means to choose. Full video with Johnathan Bi:

Brendan McCord 🏛️ x 🤖

16,456 views • 11 months ago

🚨 Subcommittee Chair Marjorie Taylor Greene (Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸) Opens Hearing on How Foreign Aid Has Been Used to Undermine U.S. Interests Around the World “Whether it be individuals, churches, or businesses, the American people are the most generous people in the entire world. They should be the ones who decide where their money goes. They can choose if they want to donate to a charity, a school, a church, or a nonprofit. They can choose if they want to privately donate to a transgender salon in Mumbai. They can choose if they want to privately donate to the British Broadcasting Corporation. They can choose if they want to privately donate to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth Alliance, or to electric vehicles in Vietnam, or to changing the national census in Bangladesh to be more gender inclusive. That is something they should be able to choose, not be forced to fund by our government. “The Democrat-run USAID should not get to use our federal government—our U.S. taxpayer dollars— as their party piggy bank to push their radical agenda in countries that we have no business giving money to. 96% of all political contributions from USAID employees go to Democrat Party candidates or PACs. That’s 96%!”

🚨 Subcommittee Chair Marjorie Taylor Greene (Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸) Opens Hearing on How Foreign Aid Has Been Used to Undermine U.S. Interests Around the World “Whether it be individuals, churches, or businesses, the American people are the most generous people in the entire world. They should be the ones who decide where their money goes. They can choose if they want to donate to a charity, a school, a church, or a nonprofit. They can choose if they want to privately donate to a transgender salon in Mumbai. They can choose if they want to privately donate to the British Broadcasting Corporation. They can choose if they want to privately donate to the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth Alliance, or to electric vehicles in Vietnam, or to changing the national census in Bangladesh to be more gender inclusive. That is something they should be able to choose, not be forced to fund by our government. “The Democrat-run USAID should not get to use our federal government—our U.S. taxpayer dollars— as their party piggy bank to push their radical agenda in countries that we have no business giving money to. 96% of all political contributions from USAID employees go to Democrat Party candidates or PACs. That’s 96%!”

Oversight Committee

135,568 views • 1 year ago

This is cool, Elon Musk says SpaceX will allow their customers to use any GPU or TPU they want in SpaceX AI Satellites. "We do intend with our SpaceX AI Satellites to allow people to put whatever GPU or TPU they want. So Nvidia GPUS can be put on it, Google TPUs can be put on it, Amazon Trainium, or any other chips people want to put on. It will be such that you can run anyone’s AI, hardware or software on the SpaceX AI Satellites." An open platform design is so smart.

This is cool, Elon Musk says SpaceX will allow their customers to use any GPU or TPU they want in SpaceX AI Satellites. "We do intend with our SpaceX AI Satellites to allow people to put whatever GPU or TPU they want. So Nvidia GPUS can be put on it, Google TPUs can be put on it, Amazon Trainium, or any other chips people want to put on. It will be such that you can run anyone’s AI, hardware or software on the SpaceX AI Satellites." An open platform design is so smart.

Nic Cruz Patane

115,448 views • 2 months ago

Take a moment to pause, reflect, and truly let this sink in. Think about the reality unfolding before our eyes—the suffering, the injustice, and the resilience of those enduring it. Let it weigh on your heart, not as a passing thought but as a call to awareness and action. What we choose to acknowledge, what we choose to stand for, defines us. So don’t just scroll past—sit with this, feel it, and ask yourself: What can I do?

Take a moment to pause, reflect, and truly let this sink in. Think about the reality unfolding before our eyes—the suffering, the injustice, and the resilience of those enduring it. Let it weigh on your heart, not as a passing thought but as a call to awareness and action. What we choose to acknowledge, what we choose to stand for, defines us. So don’t just scroll past—sit with this, feel it, and ask yourself: What can I do?

Robert Martin 🇵🇸

44,150 views • 1 year ago

EXCLUSIVE: Secretary Marco Rubio issues a blunt warning to Iran, saying the U.S. will not tolerate any effort to hold international waterways hostage through extortion or threats of force: “If what they mean by opening the straits is, yes, the straits are opened as long as you coordinate with Iran, get our permission or we'll blow you up, and you pay us. That's not opening the straits.” “Those are international waterways. They cannot normalize, nor can we tolerate them trying to normalize, a system in which the Iranians decide who gets to use an international waterway and how much you have to pay them to use it.” Trey Yingst

EXCLUSIVE: Secretary Marco Rubio issues a blunt warning to Iran, saying the U.S. will not tolerate any effort to hold international waterways hostage through extortion or threats of force: “If what they mean by opening the straits is, yes, the straits are opened as long as you coordinate with Iran, get our permission or we'll blow you up, and you pay us. That's not opening the straits.” “Those are international waterways. They cannot normalize, nor can we tolerate them trying to normalize, a system in which the Iranians decide who gets to use an international waterway and how much you have to pay them to use it.” Trey Yingst

Fox News

159,418 views • 3 months ago

We built an app called Hatch It enables Karpathy's entire LLM Knowledge Base workflow out of the box, in 2 or 3 clicks, in a single interface. No need to stitch together Obsidian + plugins + markdown files + custom tools + etc. Hatch is an AI workspace where files, docs, and chats all live together. Not only can the chats READ files and docs, but they can WRITE and ORGANIZE them as well. This means you can set up an LLM Wiki in literally 3 steps, as I show in this video.

We built an app called Hatch It enables Karpathy's entire LLM Knowledge Base workflow out of the box, in 2 or 3 clicks, in a single interface. No need to stitch together Obsidian + plugins + markdown files + custom tools + etc. Hatch is an AI workspace where files, docs, and chats all live together. Not only can the chats READ files and docs, but they can WRITE and ORGANIZE them as well. This means you can set up an LLM Wiki in literally 3 steps, as I show in this video.

Channing Allen

180,804 views • 4 months ago

U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, to FOX: ‘What they [Iran] mean by opening the Strait of Hormuz is that yes, the Strait is open, as long as you coordinate with Iran and get our permission or we’ll blow you up, and you pay us. That’s not opening the Strait. Those are international waterways, they cannot normalize nor can we tolerate a system in which Iran decides who gets to use an international waterway and how much you have to pay them to use it.’

U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, to FOX: ‘What they [Iran] mean by opening the Strait of Hormuz is that yes, the Strait is open, as long as you coordinate with Iran and get our permission or we’ll blow you up, and you pay us. That’s not opening the Strait. Those are international waterways, they cannot normalize nor can we tolerate a system in which Iran decides who gets to use an international waterway and how much you have to pay them to use it.’

Mossad Commentary

118,330 views • 3 months ago

Dr Oz: "We have an advantage with AI. You know why? We don't think the way fraudsters think. That's just not what our minds do. The bank managers don't think about bank fraud. They want to do loans and help businesses. Fraudsters think about fraud. So the AI can think the way a fraudster thinks."

Dr Oz: "We have an advantage with AI. You know why? We don't think the way fraudsters think. That's just not what our minds do. The bank managers don't think about bank fraud. They want to do loans and help businesses. Fraudsters think about fraud. So the AI can think the way a fraudster thinks."

Aaron Rupar

43,744 views • 10 months ago

CYBER SLEUTH: Can AI crack the Nancy Guthrie case? A former White House Chief Information Officer says the new tech could lead to a major breakthrough: "They can start using AI to match up the eyes, so we have the eyes, the eyebrows, you can use AI to ask questions about what are the probabilities that these faces actually could be a good match, what are the probabilities that this person is wearing layers of clothing and they are not this bulky, what are the probabilities that they are taller than they seem to be and what do they weigh." "There's a lot of things that AI can be doing to aid this investigation."

CYBER SLEUTH: Can AI crack the Nancy Guthrie case? A former White House Chief Information Officer says the new tech could lead to a major breakthrough: "They can start using AI to match up the eyes, so we have the eyes, the eyebrows, you can use AI to ask questions about what are the probabilities that these faces actually could be a good match, what are the probabilities that this person is wearing layers of clothing and they are not this bulky, what are the probabilities that they are taller than they seem to be and what do they weigh." "There's a lot of things that AI can be doing to aid this investigation."

Fox News

56,704 views • 6 months ago

NOMVULO MOKONYANE The SACP has taken a decision to contest & steal our own constituency using our resources. They want to do what the MKP did in KZN We are much wiser now. The NGC has instructed us to go tell Solly Mapaila and his people to now leave the ANC and let us meet on the ground. Before end of this much, we would have fired a lot of SACP deployees Those SACP people deployed by the ANC in municipalities, government will be forced to choose which party they want to belong to. Once they choose SACP, they are fired. No more dual membership!!

NOMVULO MOKONYANE The SACP has taken a decision to contest & steal our own constituency using our resources. They want to do what the MKP did in KZN We are much wiser now. The NGC has instructed us to go tell Solly Mapaila and his people to now leave the ANC and let us meet on the ground. Before end of this much, we would have fired a lot of SACP deployees Those SACP people deployed by the ANC in municipalities, government will be forced to choose which party they want to belong to. Once they choose SACP, they are fired. No more dual membership!!

Constitution First 🇿🇦

30,711 views • 4 months ago

Today we're launching Amplitude MCP MCP was made for data analytics. Ask a vague question and have an AI model iteratively query Amplitude to find you insights. Amplitude MCP exposes all of Amplitude's functionality so an agent can interact with it directly. It allows you to use Amplitude without having to know anything about Amplitude's user interface or your data taxonomy. It uses the intelligence of off the shelf AI agents, including Claude, Gemini, and Cursor, to query Amplitude data you already have to find answers. It leverages all of your existing Amplitude data and how it's used to navigate through large complex behavioral datasets. You can have conversations about your product data directly inside any AI model with MCP. It can create Amplitude dashboards and notebooks with what it finds and even make recommendations. This is the best MCP use case I've ever seen. Watching an AI agent think, reason, query Amplitude, and then repeat that process iteratively is magical. See it in action:

Today we're launching Amplitude MCP MCP was made for data analytics. Ask a vague question and have an AI model iteratively query Amplitude to find you insights. Amplitude MCP exposes all of Amplitude's functionality so an agent can interact with it directly. It allows you to use Amplitude without having to know anything about Amplitude's user interface or your data taxonomy. It uses the intelligence of off the shelf AI agents, including Claude, Gemini, and Cursor, to query Amplitude data you already have to find answers. It leverages all of your existing Amplitude data and how it's used to navigate through large complex behavioral datasets. You can have conversations about your product data directly inside any AI model with MCP. It can create Amplitude dashboards and notebooks with what it finds and even make recommendations. This is the best MCP use case I've ever seen. Watching an AI agent think, reason, query Amplitude, and then repeat that process iteratively is magical. See it in action:

Spenser Skates

32,332 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk on the SpaceXAI satellites: “We intend for SpaceXAI satellites to allow people to use whatever GPU or TPU they want. NVIDIA GPUs, Google TPUs, Amazon Trainiums, or any other chips can be put on them. We will also offer our own chips, and we want to offer our AI software, in the future. It will be such that you can run anyone’s AI hardware or software on the SpaceXAI satellites.”

Elon Musk on the SpaceXAI satellites: “We intend for SpaceXAI satellites to allow people to use whatever GPU or TPU they want. NVIDIA GPUs, Google TPUs, Amazon Trainiums, or any other chips can be put on them. We will also offer our own chips, and we want to offer our AI software, in the future. It will be such that you can run anyone’s AI hardware or software on the SpaceXAI satellites.”

NIK

48,256 views • 2 months ago

We can understand and use artificial intelligence (AI) and other technological innovations in the context of faith. We are not afraid of AI, nor do we think it is the answer to every problem. As we work hard and smart, AI can be a valuable tool to enhance, but not replace, our own efforts. When we receive wisdom and understanding from God, we can begin to see as He sees—things we would otherwise not understand.

We can understand and use artificial intelligence (AI) and other technological innovations in the context of faith. We are not afraid of AI, nor do we think it is the answer to every problem. As we work hard and smart, AI can be a valuable tool to enhance, but not replace, our own efforts. When we receive wisdom and understanding from God, we can begin to see as He sees—things we would otherwise not understand.

Gerrit W. Gong

28,340 views • 10 months ago

OMG the DOJ is trying to pass an AI generated video of a FORD not a Honda Pilot & gray not burgundy saying it’s Renee Nicole Good’s vehicle hitting the ICE agent which is total bull crap no wonder they want to AI around do bad do they can try to use it to lie and manipulate! 🤬

OMG the DOJ is trying to pass an AI generated video of a FORD not a Honda Pilot & gray not burgundy saying it’s Renee Nicole Good’s vehicle hitting the ICE agent which is total bull crap no wonder they want to AI around do bad do they can try to use it to lie and manipulate! 🤬

Suzie rizzio

676,104 views • 7 months ago