Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Interview PART 8 - TRANSLATED Iran's Foreign Minister: The January Protests Were HIJACKED to Manufacture a Pretext for War Dr. Abbas Araghchi said the demonstrations began as GENUINE public protests. That changed on January 8th. Weapons entered on a wide scale and TRAINED personnel appeared, which he said pointed...

RyanRozbiani's profile picture

Ryan Rozbiani

202,448 subscribers

19,142 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Interview PART 5, TRANSLATED Iran's FM: Iran Forced The U.S. To Sign A NON AGGRESSION Commitment Dr. Abbas Araghchi said Netanyahu convinced Trump that Iran was weakened enough to finish in two days, and that no better opening would ever come. Trump turned on that analysis once the war dragged on. "The enemy started the war with unconditional surrender." Araghchi said Iran ended it with a memorandum in which the U.S. committed not to start any war against Iran, not to threaten Iran, to respect Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to stay out of its internal affairs.
3:37

Interview PART 5, TRANSLATED Iran's FM: Iran Forced The U.S. To Sign A NON AGGRESSION Commitment Dr. Abbas Araghchi said Netanyahu convinced Trump that Iran was weakened enough to finish in two days, and that no better opening would ever come. Trump turned on that analysis once the war dragged on. "The enemy started the war with unconditional surrender." Araghchi said Iran ended it with a memorandum in which the U.S. committed not to start any war against Iran, not to threaten Iran, to respect Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to stay out of its internal affairs.

Ryan Rozbiani

24,867 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Interview PART 2 - TRANSLATED Iran's Foreign Minister Araghchi: Our Missile Power TRIPLED Before the 40-Day War Seyed Abbas Araghchi detailed what Iran rebuilt in the months between the 12-day war and the 40-day war. "I asked Mr. Pakpour how our missile situation was, and he said we have tripled." "The 12-day war caused us to become stronger and more prepared for the next war." "An American think tank said 10 to 25 percent of Iran's launchers were being destroyed daily, and that a third were already gone." "They were unaware that in those six months Iran's launcher system had changed into a form where everything they hit could be replaced." Araghchi says the enemy drew two wrong conclusions after the 12-day war: prepare for a longer fight, and break the government's social base before hitting the government itself. Both failed. The pause they thought was Iran's weakness was Iran rearming.
3:30

Interview PART 2 - TRANSLATED Iran's Foreign Minister Araghchi: Our Missile Power TRIPLED Before the 40-Day War Seyed Abbas Araghchi detailed what Iran rebuilt in the months between the 12-day war and the 40-day war. "I asked Mr. Pakpour how our missile situation was, and he said we have tripled." "The 12-day war caused us to become stronger and more prepared for the next war." "An American think tank said 10 to 25 percent of Iran's launchers were being destroyed daily, and that a third were already gone." "They were unaware that in those six months Iran's launcher system had changed into a form where everything they hit could be replaced." Araghchi says the enemy drew two wrong conclusions after the 12-day war: prepare for a longer fight, and break the government's social base before hitting the government itself. Both failed. The pause they thought was Iran's weakness was Iran rearming.

Ryan Rozbiani

16,367 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Dr. Araghchi says that from the moment he arrived at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the attack, he began issuing statements without interruption... I immediately began contacting the Foreign Ministers of regional countries... I knew the plan had been pre-designed: if Iran were attacked, we would target American military bases in the region... I called all the Foreign Ministers of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries and told all of them that we would target American military bases... I emphasised to them that this action was not against the regional countries, but against American forces stationed on their soil. Dr. Araghchi says they all protested and said such an action should not be taken... In response, Dr. Araghchi told them that "we did not start this war; it was a war imposed on us"... I also reminded them that we had informed them of this in advance... from that afternoon onward, our ambassadors were summoned in some regional countries... Dr. Araghchi reveals that on the 3rd day of the war, early in the morning, one of the region's Foreign Ministers called... (He does not specify who, but the interviewer asks whether it was the UAE or KSA to which Dr. Araghchi refuses to comment) The Foreign Minister said: In response to the attack on our soil, we will strike one of your positions at a specific time; but we do not intend to continue the conflict... He said: You should not target us anymore, and we will not take action against you either... The Americans and Israelis were also sending messages through them, making threats... Dr. Araghchi responded by warning him that if you target us, this time we will target you directly, and a war will begin between Iran and your country... He replied: So what should we do? Dr. Araghchi told him to postpone their attack until around noon... perhaps by then a solution could be reached... Dr. Araghchi: They delayed their attack... and after some negotiations, we reached an understanding that if they did not allow the American bases on their soil to be used for attacking Iran, we would not target them either... But of course, they did not abide by that... and we continued to target US positions on their soil until the end of the war... Dr. Araghchi says the reality is that none of the regional countries believed Iran could target them and they would be unable to respond... This was a major transformation and altered the security structure of the region...
6:07

Dr. Araghchi says that from the moment he arrived at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the attack, he began issuing statements without interruption... I immediately began contacting the Foreign Ministers of regional countries... I knew the plan had been pre-designed: if Iran were attacked, we would target American military bases in the region... I called all the Foreign Ministers of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries and told all of them that we would target American military bases... I emphasised to them that this action was not against the regional countries, but against American forces stationed on their soil. Dr. Araghchi says they all protested and said such an action should not be taken... In response, Dr. Araghchi told them that "we did not start this war; it was a war imposed on us"... I also reminded them that we had informed them of this in advance... from that afternoon onward, our ambassadors were summoned in some regional countries... Dr. Araghchi reveals that on the 3rd day of the war, early in the morning, one of the region's Foreign Ministers called... (He does not specify who, but the interviewer asks whether it was the UAE or KSA to which Dr. Araghchi refuses to comment) The Foreign Minister said: In response to the attack on our soil, we will strike one of your positions at a specific time; but we do not intend to continue the conflict... He said: You should not target us anymore, and we will not take action against you either... The Americans and Israelis were also sending messages through them, making threats... Dr. Araghchi responded by warning him that if you target us, this time we will target you directly, and a war will begin between Iran and your country... He replied: So what should we do? Dr. Araghchi told him to postpone their attack until around noon... perhaps by then a solution could be reached... Dr. Araghchi: They delayed their attack... and after some negotiations, we reached an understanding that if they did not allow the American bases on their soil to be used for attacking Iran, we would not target them either... But of course, they did not abide by that... and we continued to target US positions on their soil until the end of the war... Dr. Araghchi says the reality is that none of the regional countries believed Iran could target them and they would be unable to respond... This was a major transformation and altered the security structure of the region...

ساسان

18,124 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: We entered the negotiations to prove to the whole world that their intention was to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran; their intention was hostile. And they could not claim that we requested negotiations and the Islamic Republic did not accept. We also negotiated so that it would be clear that the truth was with us, so that ultimate proof would be established for the whole world. Our own people would also understand that it wasn't the Islamic Republic that caused the war by refraining from negotiations. Because there was a question: if we hadn't negotiated and a war had broken out, everyone might have thought to themselves that if we had negotiated, the war wouldn't have happened.
1:02

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: We entered the negotiations to prove to the whole world that their intention was to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran; their intention was hostile. And they could not claim that we requested negotiations and the Islamic Republic did not accept. We also negotiated so that it would be clear that the truth was with us, so that ultimate proof would be established for the whole world. Our own people would also understand that it wasn't the Islamic Republic that caused the war by refraining from negotiations. Because there was a question: if we hadn't negotiated and a war had broken out, everyone might have thought to themselves that if we had negotiated, the war wouldn't have happened.

Clash Report

28,540 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

💢 Iran’s FM: “We are not at that point yet” to end the war, says this time must lead to a permanent end ▪️ Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran will not consider another temporary ceasefire, arguing that previous pauses in fighting only allowed Israel and the US to restart war. Asked what conditions could end the war, Araghchi said: “We are not at that point yet. Obviously this time is different from the previous time.” ▪️ He said Iran previously agreed to halt fighting once attacks stopped. “When the aggression was stopped, we stopped too. But it didn’t bring about peace.” ▪️ Now, he said, the same pattern is repeating. “Now they want to ask for a ceasefire again. Well this doesn’t work like this. There should be a permanent end of the war.” ▪️ Until that happens, he said Iran will continue fighting. “Unless we get to that I think we need to continue fighting for the sake of our people and our security.” ▪️ Asked if Iran would accept a ceasefire to restart negotiations, Araghchi said the U.S. and Israel must first account for starting the war. “They have to explain why they started this aggression before we come to the point to even consider a ceasefire.” ▪️ “It is not fair that if they only stop the aggression and ask us to stop too… this time is different,” he said.
2:49

💢 Iran’s FM: “We are not at that point yet” to end the war, says this time must lead to a permanent end ▪️ Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran will not consider another temporary ceasefire, arguing that previous pauses in fighting only allowed Israel and the US to restart war. Asked what conditions could end the war, Araghchi said: “We are not at that point yet. Obviously this time is different from the previous time.” ▪️ He said Iran previously agreed to halt fighting once attacks stopped. “When the aggression was stopped, we stopped too. But it didn’t bring about peace.” ▪️ Now, he said, the same pattern is repeating. “Now they want to ask for a ceasefire again. Well this doesn’t work like this. There should be a permanent end of the war.” ▪️ Until that happens, he said Iran will continue fighting. “Unless we get to that I think we need to continue fighting for the sake of our people and our security.” ▪️ Asked if Iran would accept a ceasefire to restart negotiations, Araghchi said the U.S. and Israel must first account for starting the war. “They have to explain why they started this aggression before we come to the point to even consider a ceasefire.” ▪️ “It is not fair that if they only stop the aggression and ask us to stop too… this time is different,” he said.

Drop Site

223,383 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Commenting on the Iran war, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that President Donald Trump's policy toward Iran is a "head for an eye." That was in response to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi supposedly describing Iran's own policy toward the war as an "eye for an eye."
1:09

Commenting on the Iran war, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that President Donald Trump's policy toward Iran is a "head for an eye." That was in response to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi supposedly describing Iran's own policy toward the war as an "eye for an eye."

The Associated Press

158,710 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Shocking revelation from an interview with the regime’s foreign minister conducted by a state TV documentary director: he admits that Mashhad and several other cities effectively fell during the January 8 uprising in Iran, and that the regime never anticipated the scale of the protests. This aligns with earlier reports from a source inside the Khorasan Razavi governor’s office, who said that at an emergency Security Council meeting at 11 a.m. on January 9, officials announced they had received orders from higher authorities to crush the protests at any cost, regardless of the death toll. According to the source: “They ordered us to kill and terrorize people to such an extent that by January 10, no one would dare return to the streets.”
1:02

Shocking revelation from an interview with the regime’s foreign minister conducted by a state TV documentary director: he admits that Mashhad and several other cities effectively fell during the January 8 uprising in Iran, and that the regime never anticipated the scale of the protests. This aligns with earlier reports from a source inside the Khorasan Razavi governor’s office, who said that at an emergency Security Council meeting at 11 a.m. on January 9, officials announced they had received orders from higher authorities to crush the protests at any cost, regardless of the death toll. According to the source: “They ordered us to kill and terrorize people to such an extent that by January 10, no one would dare return to the streets.”

Navid Mohebbi نوید محبی

20,934 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Collins: Some people may say, well, why are we at war with them now if it was obliterated, then? Scott: Well, because they're rebuilding their program because they said they had they they had enriched uranium and because they were building ballistic missile weapons, the missiles and the ability to carry those to the United States.
1:09

Collins: Some people may say, well, why are we at war with them now if it was obliterated, then? Scott: Well, because they're rebuilding their program because they said they had they they had enriched uranium and because they were building ballistic missile weapons, the missiles and the ability to carry those to the United States.

Acyn

35,915 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

VIDEO: How we used religion to give Tinubu victory – El-Rufai The former Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai, has said that he and some northern governors used religion as a political tool to give victory to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu in the 2023 presidential election. According to the former governor, the decision to use religion as a political strategy was to help tackle the issue of tribalism and religion in politics in the country. The former governor stated this in a viral video. He was speaking to an audience in the Hausa language in Kaduna at an event before handing over to his successor. He said, “Allah sees our heart, me and Zamfara State Governor, Mutawalle did it because of God and we didn’t do it because of anything. We only do it in order to have solutions to the current religious problem we are having in Nigeria and for us to give South West Muslims a sense of belonging to rule. And it is because of religion that we used that gave Asiwaju victory.” He also noted that the Muslim/Muslim ticket that he used to achieve political success in Kaduna has now been replicated in Nigeria with the emergence of Bola Tinubu as president and Kashim Shetima as vice president. He said, “What we are able to achieve in Kaduna state now has been achieved in Nigeria as a whole. There is no liar that will come and say he will do politics as a Christian and win an election. Even Peter Obi didn’t win.” He stated that he alongside other northern governors successfully pushed for the emergence of a Yoruba Muslim from the South West as president despite opposition from some quarters El Rufai speaking in Hausa said in part, “Concerning the Presidential government, what Professor Akintola said is true. We the Northern governors agreed that the presidential position should go back to the West. It was a verbal promise but a promise whether written or spoken, God knows. “When we saw some people plotting for presidential position to remain in the North, we disagreed, we are not like that. We said we are Muslims and we have our traditions and we cannot go back on our words. That was the first step. The second step is after we all agreed or they realised that they cannot do anything, we will tackle the issue of tribalism and religion in politics in this country. We agreed that we will support BAT. “When we had that agreement I was not on good terms with him, (Tinubu), we were fighting. But Professor Akintola and their leaders came from Lagos and said this is their thought If power is given to the West since we all agreed that it should be given to them the Yoruba people from the South-West have a problem, their Muslims cannot contest, and win an election. A Christian will have to contest and have a Muslim from the North as a vice. They said since from Abiola it had never happened. They said they wanted that and I asked them to bring the person we will support and BAT got the ticket. We knew he will have to take a Muslim as his vice.” He added, “What we are able to achieve in Kaduna state now has been achieved in Nigeria as a whole. There's no liar that will come and say he will do politics as a Christian and win the election. Even Peter Obi didn't win.” Credit: Tafarkin Magabata TV --- Follow us for more breaking news and videos
5:31

VIDEO: How we used religion to give Tinubu victory – El-Rufai The former Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai, has said that he and some northern governors used religion as a political tool to give victory to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu in the 2023 presidential election. According to the former governor, the decision to use religion as a political strategy was to help tackle the issue of tribalism and religion in politics in the country. The former governor stated this in a viral video. He was speaking to an audience in the Hausa language in Kaduna at an event before handing over to his successor. He said, “Allah sees our heart, me and Zamfara State Governor, Mutawalle did it because of God and we didn’t do it because of anything. We only do it in order to have solutions to the current religious problem we are having in Nigeria and for us to give South West Muslims a sense of belonging to rule. And it is because of religion that we used that gave Asiwaju victory.” He also noted that the Muslim/Muslim ticket that he used to achieve political success in Kaduna has now been replicated in Nigeria with the emergence of Bola Tinubu as president and Kashim Shetima as vice president. He said, “What we are able to achieve in Kaduna state now has been achieved in Nigeria as a whole. There is no liar that will come and say he will do politics as a Christian and win an election. Even Peter Obi didn’t win.” He stated that he alongside other northern governors successfully pushed for the emergence of a Yoruba Muslim from the South West as president despite opposition from some quarters El Rufai speaking in Hausa said in part, “Concerning the Presidential government, what Professor Akintola said is true. We the Northern governors agreed that the presidential position should go back to the West. It was a verbal promise but a promise whether written or spoken, God knows. “When we saw some people plotting for presidential position to remain in the North, we disagreed, we are not like that. We said we are Muslims and we have our traditions and we cannot go back on our words. That was the first step. The second step is after we all agreed or they realised that they cannot do anything, we will tackle the issue of tribalism and religion in politics in this country. We agreed that we will support BAT. “When we had that agreement I was not on good terms with him, (Tinubu), we were fighting. But Professor Akintola and their leaders came from Lagos and said this is their thought If power is given to the West since we all agreed that it should be given to them the Yoruba people from the South-West have a problem, their Muslims cannot contest, and win an election. A Christian will have to contest and have a Muslim from the North as a vice. They said since from Abiola it had never happened. They said they wanted that and I asked them to bring the person we will support and BAT got the ticket. We knew he will have to take a Muslim as his vice.” He added, “What we are able to achieve in Kaduna state now has been achieved in Nigeria as a whole. There's no liar that will come and say he will do politics as a Christian and win the election. Even Peter Obi didn't win.” Credit: Tafarkin Magabata TV --- Follow us for more breaking news and videos

Punch Newspapers

652,241 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

#WATCH | US President Donald J Trump says, "India and Pakistan were going at it. I called them both... They had just shot down seven planes... I said, if you do this, there's not going to be any trade, and I stopped the war. It was raging for four days... The Prime Minister of Pakistan was here, along with the Field Marshal, who's a very important guy in Pakistan... I didn't even realise it was as beautiful as he said it. He said to a group of people that were with us... that this man saved millions of lives because he saved the war from going on. That war was going to get very bad..." (Source: The White House/YouTube)
1:25

#WATCH | US President Donald J Trump says, "India and Pakistan were going at it. I called them both... They had just shot down seven planes... I said, if you do this, there's not going to be any trade, and I stopped the war. It was raging for four days... The Prime Minister of Pakistan was here, along with the Field Marshal, who's a very important guy in Pakistan... I didn't even realise it was as beautiful as he said it. He said to a group of people that were with us... that this man saved millions of lives because he saved the war from going on. That war was going to get very bad..." (Source: The White House/YouTube)

ANI

1,039,127 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 NEW: Trump says the U.S. struck Iran because, if he “didn’t hit them first,” Tehran would have “taken over the Middle East” and attacked Israel. Speaking to reporters today, President Trump said Iran was planning to “take over the Middle East” with its “thousands of missiles” and “try and destroy Israel” — two of the three justifications he cited for launching the U.S.-Israeli regime change war against Iran on February 28. Trump also claimed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, saying Iranian negotiators had effectively told Washington: “We want to continue to build nuclear weapons.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X in the days before the first U.S. strike that Iran will “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon,” a position also confirmed by Oman’s foreign minister, who was mediating the talks. Since coming to power in the 1979 revolution, Iran’s regime has not initiated a war against another state, but it has supported armed groups resisting Israel’s occupation and expansion.
0:52

🚨 NEW: Trump says the U.S. struck Iran because, if he “didn’t hit them first,” Tehran would have “taken over the Middle East” and attacked Israel. Speaking to reporters today, President Trump said Iran was planning to “take over the Middle East” with its “thousands of missiles” and “try and destroy Israel” — two of the three justifications he cited for launching the U.S.-Israeli regime change war against Iran on February 28. Trump also claimed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, saying Iranian negotiators had effectively told Washington: “We want to continue to build nuclear weapons.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X in the days before the first U.S. strike that Iran will “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon,” a position also confirmed by Oman’s foreign minister, who was mediating the talks. Since coming to power in the 1979 revolution, Iran’s regime has not initiated a war against another state, but it has supported armed groups resisting Israel’s occupation and expansion.

Drop Site

80,364 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NEW: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says negotiating with the United States is off the table right now. It's too soon for newly chosen supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei to offer comment on talks with the U.S., Araghchi said in an interview with PBS News Hour's Amna Nawaz (amna) on Monday. But "we have a very bitter experience of talking with the Americans," he said. "We negotiated with them last year, in last June, and they attacked us in the middle of negotiations. And, again this year, they tried to convince us that this time is different," he said. Araghchi added that despite U.S. comments that it wanted to resolve nuclear questions "peacefully," Iran still faced an attack. The comments came one day after Mojtaba Khamenei was chosen as the successor to his father, the late Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an Israeli strike at the beginning of the war with Iran. Araghchi says the choice shows "continuity" and "stability."
2:36

NEW: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says negotiating with the United States is off the table right now. It's too soon for newly chosen supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei to offer comment on talks with the U.S., Araghchi said in an interview with PBS News Hour's Amna Nawaz (amna) on Monday. But "we have a very bitter experience of talking with the Americans," he said. "We negotiated with them last year, in last June, and they attacked us in the middle of negotiations. And, again this year, they tried to convince us that this time is different," he said. Araghchi added that despite U.S. comments that it wanted to resolve nuclear questions "peacefully," Iran still faced an attack. The comments came one day after Mojtaba Khamenei was chosen as the successor to his father, the late Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an Israeli strike at the beginning of the war with Iran. Araghchi says the choice shows "continuity" and "stability."

PBS News

92,360 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🔥GENIUS. This entire operation was well thought out and they took all the bait thinking Trump would back down. The U.S. Attorney said “Full disclosure if we run across someone that was here illegally we’re gonna ARREST THEM TOO” This was brilliant the U.S. attorney said they are here to conduct operations to pick up criminals and people on their final warning to leave the county. He was EMPHATIC that regardless of what is occurring the operations are being completed and are undeterred and have mobilized the border patrol as well to protect federal buildings. When asked about the “resistance” and people being said he said “IT IS WHAT IT IS WE ARE ENFORCING THE LAW” This was a brilliant well orchestrated move to bait illegals into coming out and protesting and exposing themselves and they also will be picked up and deported. So please continue on and you will notice naturally that after is clear that this operation will continue you will see these “protestors” many of which I bet are paid go into hiding. The reason the leftists are fighting this tooth and nail is because IMO their elections are completely reliant on illegal votes in the NO ID STATES and these states will start reverting back to red. And ONCE AGAIN the peaceful left is on display exposing themselves as the violent non peaceful party they are and we need to determine who was orchestrating the “Resistance”
2:26

🔥GENIUS. This entire operation was well thought out and they took all the bait thinking Trump would back down. The U.S. Attorney said “Full disclosure if we run across someone that was here illegally we’re gonna ARREST THEM TOO” This was brilliant the U.S. attorney said they are here to conduct operations to pick up criminals and people on their final warning to leave the county. He was EMPHATIC that regardless of what is occurring the operations are being completed and are undeterred and have mobilized the border patrol as well to protect federal buildings. When asked about the “resistance” and people being said he said “IT IS WHAT IT IS WE ARE ENFORCING THE LAW” This was a brilliant well orchestrated move to bait illegals into coming out and protesting and exposing themselves and they also will be picked up and deported. So please continue on and you will notice naturally that after is clear that this operation will continue you will see these “protestors” many of which I bet are paid go into hiding. The reason the leftists are fighting this tooth and nail is because IMO their elections are completely reliant on illegal votes in the NO ID STATES and these states will start reverting back to red. And ONCE AGAIN the peaceful left is on display exposing themselves as the violent non peaceful party they are and we need to determine who was orchestrating the “Resistance”

Johnny St.Pete

313,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Interview PART 10 - TRANSLATED Iran's Foreign Minister: A Security BREACH Let the U.S. and Israel Hit Four Meetings at Once Dr. Abbas Araghchi said FOUR high level meetings were running at 9:30 that morning, in four different buildings. The U.S. and Israel hit all of them at the same time. "The meeting of Mr. Shamkhani was a target. The office of Mr. Shirazi was a target. The office of Mr. Hejazi was a target. The Leader's own room was a target." "They knew the Leader was in his office every morning. They realized the commanders were meeting one or two buildings away, and they chose that MOMENT." Araghchi said the timing points to a BREACH that has not been closed, and that the danger is not only stolen information but influence over Iran's decisions. The hole that made that morning possible is still open.
3:25

Interview PART 10 - TRANSLATED Iran's Foreign Minister: A Security BREACH Let the U.S. and Israel Hit Four Meetings at Once Dr. Abbas Araghchi said FOUR high level meetings were running at 9:30 that morning, in four different buildings. The U.S. and Israel hit all of them at the same time. "The meeting of Mr. Shamkhani was a target. The office of Mr. Shirazi was a target. The office of Mr. Hejazi was a target. The Leader's own room was a target." "They knew the Leader was in his office every morning. They realized the commanders were meeting one or two buildings away, and they chose that MOMENT." Araghchi said the timing points to a BREACH that has not been closed, and that the danger is not only stolen information but influence over Iran's decisions. The hole that made that morning possible is still open.

Ryan Rozbiani

11,500 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Interview PART 21, TRANSLATED Dr. Araghchi: Iran Rejected the U.S.'s "Surrender Plan" "The first proposal they gave us was the well-known 15-point SURRENDER plan." Dr. Araghchi said Iran rejected it and submitted its own 10-point framework instead. "If they accepted our ten points as the BASIS for negotiations, we would accept the ceasefire." He said the U.S. ultimately accepted those terms, making Iran's 10-point framework the foundation of the ceasefire negotiations that led to the 14-point MoU.
3:07

Interview PART 21, TRANSLATED Dr. Araghchi: Iran Rejected the U.S.'s "Surrender Plan" "The first proposal they gave us was the well-known 15-point SURRENDER plan." Dr. Araghchi said Iran rejected it and submitted its own 10-point framework instead. "If they accepted our ten points as the BASIS for negotiations, we would accept the ceasefire." He said the U.S. ultimately accepted those terms, making Iran's 10-point framework the foundation of the ceasefire negotiations that led to the 14-point MoU.

Ryan Rozbiani

12,706 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

"When we were living as refugees, we went to many places telling the international community that Rwanda was our home and that we wanted to return. Some people would come and raise the matter with the government that was in power here. The response they received was that Rwanda was too small and that there was no place for us to go. Imagine being told there is no place for you in the very country you came from. You cannot tell someone to remain where they are, to spend their entire life as a refugee, and for their children to grow up as refugees as well. I used to tell people, even at the beginning of our liberation struggle, that whatever treatment we received in the countries where we lived, they were not the people I had a grievance against. After all, it was my own country that had denied me the right to return because it claimed there was no room for me. The people I had a grievance against were those who had the responsibility to guarantee my rights in my own country, but instead denied them. Those were the people we had to confront. And that is exactly what happened." President Kagame | Indangamirwa 16th Cohort #MeetThePresident
3:10

"When we were living as refugees, we went to many places telling the international community that Rwanda was our home and that we wanted to return. Some people would come and raise the matter with the government that was in power here. The response they received was that Rwanda was too small and that there was no place for us to go. Imagine being told there is no place for you in the very country you came from. You cannot tell someone to remain where they are, to spend their entire life as a refugee, and for their children to grow up as refugees as well. I used to tell people, even at the beginning of our liberation struggle, that whatever treatment we received in the countries where we lived, they were not the people I had a grievance against. After all, it was my own country that had denied me the right to return because it claimed there was no room for me. The people I had a grievance against were those who had the responsibility to guarantee my rights in my own country, but instead denied them. Those were the people we had to confront. And that is exactly what happened." President Kagame | Indangamirwa 16th Cohort #MeetThePresident

Presidency | Rwanda

210,643 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Please listen to Will Chamberlain school Piers Morgan on the part of what Secretary Rubio said that he’s been willfully ignoring for weeks. The reason we launched a preemptive strike on Iran is not because of Israel; the reason is because they were developing long-range missiles that would make it impossible to even try to negotiate with them in future. The reason for the TIMING of the strike (which again HAD TO HAPPEN NO MATTER WHAT) is that we knew Israel was going to strike. But this had to happen sooner or later, and Rubio said that weeks ago—the same day he said the bit about Israel—bit bad actors chose to ignore the part about the Iranian missile program and listen only to the part about Israel.
1:50

Please listen to Will Chamberlain school Piers Morgan on the part of what Secretary Rubio said that he’s been willfully ignoring for weeks. The reason we launched a preemptive strike on Iran is not because of Israel; the reason is because they were developing long-range missiles that would make it impossible to even try to negotiate with them in future. The reason for the TIMING of the strike (which again HAD TO HAPPEN NO MATTER WHAT) is that we knew Israel was going to strike. But this had to happen sooner or later, and Rubio said that weeks ago—the same day he said the bit about Israel—bit bad actors chose to ignore the part about the Iranian missile program and listen only to the part about Israel.

Natalie Jean Beisner

15,474 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on negotiations with the US before the conflict escalated “I do not know what Witkoff (US Special Envoy to the Middle East) and Kushner (Trump’s son-in-law) conveyed to their boss. What I do know is that on February 26th, when we met in Geneva, we were able to make good progress. Even the Omani Foreign Minister, who was the intermediator said it was a significant progress. He read the text of his tweet to both delegations before publishing it, and both delegations agreed that it conveyed rightly what we had achieved that day - significant progress. The interlocutors are saying whatever now to justify an unjustifiable act of aggression. I never said that we were going to make bombs. I said we have 440 kilograms of 60% enriched material, and that was not a secret, it was also mentioned in the reports of the International Atomic Energy Agency. I said that if this material were enriched more, it could be enough to produce about 10 bombs, as your own experts claim. I said we are ready to give it up, ready to dilute it, and ready to lower its level of enrichment. My point in saying this was that the concession we are offering is really big. But how they interpreted these remarks, I do not know. Perhaps it is due to a lack of enough knowledge, or perhaps because they wanted to justify an act of aggression - an act that cannot be justified in any way. I hope that the true story about what happened on February 26th in Geneva will become known to people soon. We were very close to reaching a deal.”
2:53

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on negotiations with the US before the conflict escalated “I do not know what Witkoff (US Special Envoy to the Middle East) and Kushner (Trump’s son-in-law) conveyed to their boss. What I do know is that on February 26th, when we met in Geneva, we were able to make good progress. Even the Omani Foreign Minister, who was the intermediator said it was a significant progress. He read the text of his tweet to both delegations before publishing it, and both delegations agreed that it conveyed rightly what we had achieved that day - significant progress. The interlocutors are saying whatever now to justify an unjustifiable act of aggression. I never said that we were going to make bombs. I said we have 440 kilograms of 60% enriched material, and that was not a secret, it was also mentioned in the reports of the International Atomic Energy Agency. I said that if this material were enriched more, it could be enough to produce about 10 bombs, as your own experts claim. I said we are ready to give it up, ready to dilute it, and ready to lower its level of enrichment. My point in saying this was that the concession we are offering is really big. But how they interpreted these remarks, I do not know. Perhaps it is due to a lack of enough knowledge, or perhaps because they wanted to justify an act of aggression - an act that cannot be justified in any way. I hope that the true story about what happened on February 26th in Geneva will become known to people soon. We were very close to reaching a deal.”

Supriya Shrinate

29,157 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”
1:09

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This family booked a child’s birthday party at this water park for 200 people. Then they advertised it on social media and was selling tickets to their event at this park. The park caught wind of what they were doing and cancelled their event due to over 500 people showing up for an event booked only for 250 people. Was this fair or was it another motive involved? I can’t blame them especially if they aren’t equipped to handle that many people. In college we used to always go to this bar after class late at night around 10pm. That night a friend’s band was supposed to be playing there and we helped sell tickets for the event. There ended up being a misunderstanding, the bar said there was a max occupancy of 200 people, so the band assumed they could have sold 200 tickets. We sold all of the tickets, when we got there over 40 people were already there as part of the normal crowd. So it all 200 people show up that bought tickets there would be an issue as it would exceed occupancy. The bar owner was getting antsy because he didn’t want any issues if he exceeded occupancy and was in the verge of canceling the show. The band and the owner engaged in a heated argument and the band said the way he said it, he was implying it could be 200 people and that he should only have let people in that had tickets considering it was an event. The owner argued back saying and he quoted himself that the max occupancy was 200 and that he never gave the band a number for how many tickets that could have been sold. I think they could have both handled the details much better and they were both in the wrong. The show ended up getting canceled because of how many people was continuing to show up due to his cheap drink specials he always has that night.
0:57

This family booked a child’s birthday party at this water park for 200 people. Then they advertised it on social media and was selling tickets to their event at this park. The park caught wind of what they were doing and cancelled their event due to over 500 people showing up for an event booked only for 250 people. Was this fair or was it another motive involved? I can’t blame them especially if they aren’t equipped to handle that many people. In college we used to always go to this bar after class late at night around 10pm. That night a friend’s band was supposed to be playing there and we helped sell tickets for the event. There ended up being a misunderstanding, the bar said there was a max occupancy of 200 people, so the band assumed they could have sold 200 tickets. We sold all of the tickets, when we got there over 40 people were already there as part of the normal crowd. So it all 200 people show up that bought tickets there would be an issue as it would exceed occupancy. The bar owner was getting antsy because he didn’t want any issues if he exceeded occupancy and was in the verge of canceling the show. The band and the owner engaged in a heated argument and the band said the way he said it, he was implying it could be 200 people and that he should only have let people in that had tickets considering it was an event. The owner argued back saying and he quoted himself that the max occupancy was 200 and that he never gave the band a number for how many tickets that could have been sold. I think they could have both handled the details much better and they were both in the wrong. The show ended up getting canceled because of how many people was continuing to show up due to his cheap drink specials he always has that night.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,387,931 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag