Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨INTERVIEW: “U.S. MEDIATING RUSSIA’S SECURITY CONCERNS IS COMEDY GOLD. WE BUILT THE MISSILE SITES THEY’RE COMPLAINING ABOUT” “What's funny about that proposal is that, you know, the U.S. has been at the forefront of the issues that Russia wants to be addressed. So, for example, not just NATO expansion,...

28,997 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨KIM DOTCOM IS A LEGEND 🚨Watch: ENJOY 🚨TUCKER: How is the war in Ukraine resolved? What does that look like? 🚨KIM DOTCOM: On, it looks like now on the battlefield, you know. So Russia will win against Ukraine, and, I don't think there will be a settlement. No. 🚨TUCKER: Do you believe that NATO will continue to attack Russia? KIM DOTCOM: I think, the attacks on Russia will continue for many years. I don't see the US and, Europe giving up. So, I think what Russia has to prepare for is a bigger war. TUCKER: A bigger war with United... directly with the United States and Europe? KIM DOTCOM: With Europe, yeah. TUCKER: You think that this will evolve or devolve into a direct conflict between NATO and Russia where Russia is hitting Europe, Europe is hitting Russia? KIM DOTCOM: Yeah. I think so. TUCKER: And who wins? KIM DOTCOM: Russia, of course, because Europe has no, armies. You know, NATO is a toothless tiger. Yeah. TUCKER: Why would the Western powers, why would NATO want a war with Russia? I've never understood that. KIM DOTCOM: Their alternative is the US loses, and if the US loses, it will go down. You know, the West has invested a lot in, US. So all the debt is,owned by debtors. Europe is a big debtor to the United States. So if the US stock markets, for example, all the European companies that are go down, all the European companies that are listed in the US are also going down. So we, we are talking about a loss of maybe trillions, you know. It's not something that the West, can do. They want to, prevent the US from going under. TUCKER: I think, I understand that, and I'd like to see the US not go under also, but I think they're accelerating the destruction of the United States. This is having the opposite effect. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

325,958 views • 1 month ago

‼️JUST NOW — powerful brief remarks by the leaders of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany in London: IN SHORT: Merz: “The coming days could be decisive for all of us. The destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. Nobody should doubt our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side.” Macron: "I think we have a lot of cards in our hands." Zelenskyy: "Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians." Starmer: "If there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. Matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine." FULL STATEMENTS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "But the principles remain, the principles that we've operated on for a very, very long time, which is that we stand with Ukraine, and if there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. And that's why it's so important, that we repeatedly set out the principle forward that matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine. And we stand here to support you in the conflict and support you in the negotiations and make sure that this is a just and lasting settlement if we can get that far. You're very welcome for our discussions". President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy: "Thank you very much, Kir. Thank you for organizing this meeting. Thank you, friends, Emmanuel and Friedrich, and thank you for our joint meeting. I think that it is very important now to organize such a meeting and discuss very sensitive issues regarding these talks that we had, in the United States and between us. Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians. I think there are lot of what we have to discuss and speak about. So there are a lot of things which are very important for today. I think, unity between Europe and Ukraine, and also unity between Europe, Ukraine, and the U.S. There are some things which we can't manage without Americans, things which we can't manage without Europe, and that's why we need to make some important decisions". President of France Emmanuel Macron: "And thank you Volodymyr for being with us. You are always welcome. In France, I think we all support Ukraine, and we all support peace. And peace negotiations to have sustainable, robust peace. And I think we have a lot of cards in our hands. The financing and the quality of equipments and training programs to Ukraine, the fact that Ukraine is resisting in this war, and the fact that the Russian economy is starting to suffer, especially after our latest sanctions and the US sanctions. And now I think the main issue is the convergence between our common positions, Europeans and Ukrainians, and the U.S. to finalize these, peace negotiations and re-engage in a new phase in the best possible conditions for Ukraine, for the Europeans, and for our collective security". Chancellor of Germany Friedrich Merz: "I highly appreciate that we are having the opportunity to see you, Volodymyr, together with Emmanuel, and talking about the upcoming days, because this could be a decisive time for all of us. We are trying to continue our support for Ukraine, as you know. On the other hand, we are seeing these talks and negotiations in Moscow and in the U.S. I'm looking forward to hear from you what the outcome of these talks might be. And we are still and remain strongly behind Ukraine and giving support to your country, because we all know that the destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. So that's the reason why we are here, trying to figure out what we can do. And nobody should doubt on our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. And the outcome is open. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side, but we have to talk about that. That's why we are here".

Kateryna Lisunova

373,089 views • 9 months ago

Karoline Leavitt left it to President Trump to comment on reports that Russia is sharing intelligence with Iran about U.S. military positions in the region. She added that Russia’s efforts “not making a difference,” because they have not affected U.S. strategic goals in the region. JOURNALIST: You just said on Fox that it doesn't really matter if Russia is giving to Iran information about military assets. Why doesn't it matter if the US military is put in danger by Russia? And if that what the president believes as well? KAROLINE LEAVITT: What I meant, Kristen, and thank you for giving me a chance to make it very clear. Is that it clearly is not making a difference with respect to the military operations in Iran. Because we are completely decimating them. As I said earlier, we've taken out nearly 30 of their ships. Their navy has been deemed combat ineffective. 90% reduction in ballistic missile retaliatory strikes against the U.S. and our Gulf Arab and partners in the region. JOURNALIST: Has the president's faith in Russia to cut a peace deal with Ukraine been shaken by the knowledge that Russia is apparently supplying intelligence to Iran in this conflict? KAROLINE LEAVITT: I think the president would say that peace is still an achievable objective with respect to the Russia-Ukraine war. You saw Special Envoy Witkoff put out a tweet yesterday announcing a new prisoner exchange between both Russia and Ukraine. So it's something this administration still wants to see and something I know the president will continue to work on. JOURNALIST: Has the president expressed his frustration to Putin about this intelligence sharing? KAROLINE LEAVITT: I'll let the president speak on that directly.

Kateryna Lisunova

29,632 views • 6 months ago

‼️🚨 RUBIO ON SECURITY GUARANTEES FOR UKRAINE: Any security guarantees would come into effect after the conflict ends. They would involve the deployment of European troops on the ground, backed by the U.S. Europe does not have the capability to provide a credible security guarantee without a U.S. backstop — which means the U.S. could potentially be committed in a future conflict. SENATOR (R) JIM RISCH: I understand you to say that the portion of the discussions regarding security for Ukraine is essentially agreed to by both sides? Because that’s news to me, and it’s big news if that’s a fact. SECRETARY OF STATE, MARCO RUBIO: I think you could argue they’re agreed to from our side of the equation, right. There’s obviously a Russian dynamic at play here. Of course, any security guarantees would come into play after the conflict were to end, so there’s that component to it. But the broader point I was making is that in all these discussions about security guarantees that people are putting out there, it’s pretty clear that the only security guarantee people keep pushing forward is one that involves the deployment of some European troops on the ground, but with a very strong U.S. backstop. In Europe, they don’t have the capability to provide a real security guarantee without a U.S. backstop, which tells you the capability gap that needs to be closed. And it’s one of the reasons why the president keeps pointing to NATO and the need for our partners to get stronger. And it is true — they’ve committed to 5% spending. That’s obviously going to take some time, but that’s really the broader point I was trying to make in that regard. But every notion of a security guarantee that’s been talked about and that the Europeans have pushed is one that requires a strong commitment by the United States as a backstop, which in essence means we would potentially be committed in a future conflict. And that’s something that I think needs to be understood in the context of what I’ve just described as the problems with NATO capabilities.

Kateryna Lisunova

25,550 views • 7 months ago