正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Introducing OGDb - World’s first Open Glucose Database. This was too precious for us to monetise and keep behind a paywall. Play with it here: Backed by 1 bn+ anonymised glucose data points - find the difference between smart marketing and reality.

61,814 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Mohit Kumar 的头像
Mohit Kumar2 年前

See how a popular ‘healthy breakfast’ performs from a glucose response perspective

Mohit Kumar 的头像
Mohit Kumar2 年前

See how it validates why a high protein breakfast might make you feel less sluggish post breakfast

Mohit Kumar 的头像
Mohit Kumar2 年前

And how granola bars might not be as healthy as you think..

Mohit Kumar 的头像
Mohit Kumar2 年前

This makes me slightly sad but atleast I know now 😬. Ignorance shouldn’t be bliss 😀

Mohit Kumar 的头像
Mohit Kumar2 年前

And the best part. It tells you how to make your favourite foods work for you. No food is purely healthy or unhealthy. Portion, macros and what you eat along with it matter too..

Mohit Kumar 的头像
Mohit Kumar2 年前

Give it a spin here

anmol maini 的头像
anmol maini2 年前

You should turn this into an API

Joel John 的头像
Joel John2 年前

incredibly valuable

Aditya Thakker 的头像
Aditya Thakker2 年前

You had me on Thepla

Gayatri Vasudeva Yadav 的头像
Gayatri Vasudeva Yadav2 年前

Brilliant! This is a treasure trove!

相关视频

Can CGMs be harmful? Continuous glucose monitors are big business these days, and for sure, they can be helpful. Especially for people with type 1 diabetes and anyone treated with insulin, they can be a godsend. 🙌 However, they are now also promoted as tools for anyone to "avoid blood sugar spikes" to improve health and weight loss. This obviously expands the market massively, but is this a good and helpful way to use them? I would argue a CGM can be a good tool, if you know how to use it right. However, there are a couple of concerning risks if you don't, as I discuss in this clip: 1. Adding fats on top of any food will lower your blood glucose spike, but it can also add tons of extra empty calories, which may be counterproductive for weight loss, etc. In effect, lowering your blood glucose spike this way may lead to weight gain, not weight loss. 2. Healthy people on strict low-carb diets tend to develop "Adaptive Glucose Sparing," a fancy way of saying their glucose levels become very sensitive to even small amounts of carbohydrates. Wearing a CGM in this situation may make people afraid of even tiny amounts of carbs, like a few blueberries, thinking that any carbs are dangerous. A couple days of eating slightly more carbs could remove this issue. Berries and similar foods are hardly dangerous for healthy people. With those two major caveats, I'm all for testing CGMs and learning about blood glucose reactions to food. What is your experience with CGMs? Please share in the comments. More The clip is from my recent appearance on the Optimize Your Body podcast with Martinsilvafitness. Here's the full podcast on YouTube; it's also on Spotify and all other platforms:

Dr. E

28,506 次观看 • 2 年前

Diabetes is something you can read about anywhere. It feels different when it concerns your own family. For me, it started with my Family When the Ritual testnet launched, I wanted to build something with it that had a real use case behind it. So I started working on DiaRoutine: a Telegram bot diabetes diary for my mom. She had tried popular diabetes apps before, but never got used to them. Too many screens, too many buttons, too much friction. Telegram was easier. She could just write what happened during the day, and the bot would structure the entry. At first, it was a small idea. Then I showed the bot to someone close to me who has type 1 diabetes. I watched what confused him, what helped, and what was missing. I also spoke with an endocrinologist at the hospital. He explained that statistics over roughly three months can be important for tuning coefficients and understanding dosage patterns. The problem is that many people do not collect enough data. Sometimes it is laziness. Sometimes it is limited access to apps, paid subscriptions, sanctions, or tracking only part of the picture. That changed how I looked at the product. DiaRoutine is now built to help people collect a fuller diabetes diary with less friction. It can track: - glucose - food and nutrition - insulin - activity - boluses, coefficients, and basal profile - daily and weekly reports - doctor-ready exports - reminders from the agent - pattern observations - Ritual proofs for diary entries, reports, and exports - Raw medical data does not go onchain. Ritual is used as a proof layer and an agent layer. The bot can save hashes and proofs for daily diaries, reports, exports, or individual entries. Glucose, food, insulin, activity, notes, and Telegram ID stay private. The bot also has an AI agent connected to Ritual. It can remind the user to log glucose, follow up after food or activity, prepare a daily overview, and suggest saving a proof in Ritual. It does not give medical advice, change dosages, or send anything to Ritual without confirmation. That is what I find interesting about Ritual here. It is not about putting private medical data onchain. It is about giving an agent a verifiable layer for actions and proofs, while the sensitive data stays private. The user does not need a wallet either. A service wallet pays for gas, so the experience stays simple. DiaRoutine is still in alpha. There are bugs, rough edges, and many things to improve. But the first feedback from people using it has been positive. That matters to me because this was never just a technical experiment. It came from a real family need. Big thanks to Meison (❖,❖) for helping with development and pushing this forward with me. We will keep improving DiaRoutine, testing it with real users, and listening to people who live with diabetes every day. It is still early. But it already feels useful. try @DiaRoutine_Bot in TELEGRAM #BUILDONRITUAL

Annae.nad

12,219 次观看 • 2 个月前