Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Is crypto VC going extinct? "No, I think it's evolving." "If you rewind the clock back to 2021–2022, there were a lot more VCs who raised money on the idea that they were going to deploy into a crypto venture." "And the idea was that, well, anybody can do...

27,067 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Russfranky's profile picture
Russfranky4 days ago

In a perfect world crypto replaces VCs.

Dragonfly >|<'s profile picture
Dragonfly >|<5 days ago

Full interview via Bloomberg:

Sim's profile picture
Sim4 days ago

How does dragonfly add value that others don't? I've seen a lot of asking for money back from projects

defibagholder's profile picture
defibagholder4 days ago

wydm ur not giving me 20M for my NFT ?

Tuấn Kèo's profile picture
Tuấn Kèo4 days ago

dễ tiền vẫn còn, chỉ là chuyển sang mấy kèo meme và degen mới mà VC không với tới. họ mất nhịp với phần tiền thực đang chảy ở đó.

vøv △'s profile picture
vøv △4 days ago

@hosseeb crypto vc died in 22, the survivors are actually doing the work

Theerat Nitaya's profile picture
Theerat Nitaya4 days ago

It's definitely getting more competitive and only the institutional players with real value add are left standing.

Dash🔶's profile picture
Dash🔶4 days ago

We BDs and founders need to evolve with the times we are in.

Leon's profile picture
Leon4 days ago

The tourist phase is over. Evolution is just a polite way of saying the filter is finally working. Only real operators left standing now.

sophia l.'s profile picture
sophia l.4 days ago

Love this take

Soph n. ❀'s profile picture
Soph n. ❀4 days ago

Well said!

Related Videos

Awesome to sit down with Inversion founder Santiago R Santos at TOKEN2049 last week. This one meant a lot. Santi was my first ever guest on Risk Takers, and I was SO nervous for that first interview. Seeing how much I've grown since then nicely closed the circle on my first year interviewing some of the biggest names in crypto and finance. "It was almost irresponsible not to think about, wow, there's vastly more opportunity here relative to crypto." What we spoke about: - is the four-year crypto cycle still a thing - which crypto protocols actually make money - can OpenAI and Anthropic fund the AI build-out - why big tech is happy to borrow at 9-10% to build AI - where to invest in AI without picking the winning model - why Inversion swapped crypto for AI - the businesses AI agents put under pressure first THE CYCLE: "I think this idea of like a four-year cycle or thinking about in cycles is largely irrelevant... every year of the last couple of years has started off feeling like it's going to end. Like p(doom) has been high at the beginning of the year. And then somehow the market's up like 15, 20% and we're hitting all time high." WHERE CRYPTO MAKES MONEY: "There's only a handful of crypto companies that have really outperformed, you know, Hyperliquid, some of the other Hyperliquid type like perpetual exchanges... And then there's a whole segment that is just not interesting... Yes, I invested early on, so I'm talking my book a little bit." AI DEBT: "If someone is willing to raise and borrow money at 9%, 10%, they're doing the math on the back and saying, there's a great return to that investment. And that just, in my opinion, tells you the spread that these guys are capturing with these products." POWER AND MEMORY: "In the stack of AI that I want to be invested in, feel more comfortable, it's in power and it's in memory... Most of the memory guys are totally sold out for the next couple of years... It's almost like a drug trade. It's like I know a guy that knows a guy that can get me the chips." THE BIG WAVE: "There's a trillion dollars of AI CapEx that is going to be deployed in the next couple years. Every year... Do you want to be riding a small wave or do you want to be riding a big wave?" BANKS AND INSURERS: "Businesses that you definitely don't want to be investing behind, which is businesses that have made money on basically banking on less intelligence. And a lot of that is just banks, for instance, financial institutions, insurance companies... If your flight gets delayed, you're owed $600 by regulation... Now it's worth your time because you can deploy an agent for very little cost." Timestamps: 0:00 Coming up 1:05 Where crypto markets go next 3:21 Where crypto makes real money 6:38 What investors pay for crypto revenue 9:54 Is Nvidia still cheap? 12:31 Can OpenAI and Anthropic fund AI? 17:07 Borrowing billions to build AI 18:53 AI's need for power and memory 23:08 Can AI get cheap like Ethereum? 27:38 Is AI being sold below cost? 32:02 Can any AI lab stay ahead? 36:15 Why Inversion swapped crypto for AI 40:11 Crypto returns against stocks and bonds 42:47 Businesses built on customer confusion

Alessandro

13,143 views • 2 days ago

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,765 views • 1 year ago