Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Is Opus 5.5 better than GPT-6 Astra at Physical Intelligence "literally" ? put GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 in two Unitree G1s in MuJoCo Ring Fence. Every 2 sim seconds: state → LLM → joint targets → act. Goal: force the other out of the ring, and Astra... show more

Jiafei Duan

7,542 subscribers

52,198 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mikhail (adhd arc)

Mikhail (adhd arc)vor 4 Tagen

losing a robot fight is a brutal new eval category lol

Profilbild von Alexander

Alexandervor 4 Tagen

Finally, an benchmark that matters ... robot sumo.

Profilbild von automataleague

automataleaguevor 4 Tagen

Or you train your own RL sumo policy in minutes:

Profilbild von H

Hvor 4 Tagen

You may have unlocked a new fighting genre 😂

Profilbild von Sieventer

Sieventervor 4 Tagen

Mogged

Profilbild von TVoff

TVoffvor 4 Tagen

fake, latency is the bottleneck

Profilbild von Aryan Dhawan

Aryan Dhawanvor 4 Tagen

Lmao this is funny asf

Profilbild von Intercognitive

Intercognitivevor 4 Tagen

Deciding model superiority by wrestling is Plato-approved

Profilbild von Jeffrey Li

Jeffrey Livor 4 Tagen

Opus can barely stand

Profilbild von Jim Bohnslav

Jim Bohnslavvor 4 Tagen

you use some kind of harness, or just prompt it for joint angles in text?

Profilbild von Jiafei Duan

Jiafei Duanvor 4 Tagen

Just prompt to output joints

Profilbild von Doug Champion

Doug Championvor 4 Tagen

Please let this be the future of evals

Ähnliche Videos

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

164,011 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

GPT-6 Astra vs Opus 5.5. Two of the biggest models going head-to-head. Who actually takes it?

GPT-6 Astra vs Opus 5.5. Two of the biggest models going head-to-head. Who actually takes it?

Prashant

164,946 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API terms. Feels like a worthy rival, and honestly I am glad about that. From what I watched, Opus juggles way more at once and is faster overall. Astra is still good imo.

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API terms. Feels like a worthy rival, and honestly I am glad about that. From what I watched, Opus juggles way more at once and is faster overall. Astra is still good imo.

Stefan 3D AI

466,708 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.

BridgeMind

61,201 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

171,700 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

J A Z I I

52,951 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Emm | scenario.com

56,486 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.

AI/ML API

378,025 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Anthropic cooked with Opus 5.5 🔥🔥 its better than Fable 5.1 and Astra its little close to real one those tiny details: jaguar logo, sensors > 3d model of Waymo autonomous vehicle (Jaguar I-PACE crossover SUV) Opus 5.5 max in Claude code

Harshith

44,294 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

After Weeks Of Astra I Can Confirm Fable 5.1 > Astra Astra is a solid model, but lacks usage.. You can burn through weekly usage in 1 day of a $200 Pro Plan. Claude is actually better for usage + intelligence. Upcoming Opus 5.2 will shift focus back to Claude. OpenAI has gained traction and immediately backtracked by canceling new PRO plans. Astra is better in areas like 3D / Computer Use However the stronger model and service is with Claude. Running Fable 5.1 main orchestrator with Opus 5 / Astra workers is the meta.

After Weeks Of Astra I Can Confirm Fable 5.1 > Astra Astra is a solid model, but lacks usage.. You can burn through weekly usage in 1 day of a $200 Pro Plan. Claude is actually better for usage + intelligence. Upcoming Opus 5.2 will shift focus back to Claude. OpenAI has gained traction and immediately backtracked by canceling new PRO plans. Astra is better in areas like 3D / Computer Use However the stronger model and service is with Claude. Running Fable 5.1 main orchestrator with Opus 5 / Astra workers is the meta.

Eric ⚡️ Building...

18,120 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

Peter Yang

76,683 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Opus 4.8 for planning 🤝 GPT 5.5 for implementation Claude is a nicer conversation and /grilling partner than Codex in my experience, but GPT 5.5 on low cranks out higher quality code in fewer tokens. Here's how I divide up the work:

Opus 4.8 for planning 🤝 GPT 5.5 for implementation Claude is a nicer conversation and /grilling partner than Codex in my experience, but GPT 5.5 on low cranks out higher quality code in fewer tokens. Here's how I divide up the work:

Ben Holmes

23,115 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

33,684 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Opus 5.5 actually shows the difference. I honestly expected less. One prompt: build the DeLorean and the clock tower square, rig the car, animate the lightning strike. Both models drove Blender through the Higgsfield Blender plugin and hooked with Higgsfield MCP, where it can use Nano Banana Pro for images, Tripo for 3D models and more. The exact same test went to GPT-6 Astra. Both ran on max effort. Opus 5.5: 73 min, 218k output tokens, $27.3in API terms. Working doors, spinning wheels, the strike lands. GPT-6 Astra: 88 min, 136k output tokens, $21.3 in API terms. Skipped the generators and built all 517 objects itself.

Opus 5.5 actually shows the difference. I honestly expected less. One prompt: build the DeLorean and the clock tower square, rig the car, animate the lightning strike. Both models drove Blender through the Higgsfield Blender plugin and hooked with Higgsfield MCP, where it can use Nano Banana Pro for images, Tripo for 3D models and more. The exact same test went to GPT-6 Astra. Both ran on max effort. Opus 5.5: 73 min, 218k output tokens, $27.3in API terms. Working doors, spinning wheels, the strike lands. GPT-6 Astra: 88 min, 136k output tokens, $21.3 in API terms. Skipped the generators and built all 517 objects itself.

Stefan 3D AI

23,129 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Check out side-by-side outputs generated on Arena from Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI. Scores for Claude Opus 5.5 are coming soon. Real-world tasks from our global community of users power the Arena leaderboards. Head to Arena now to test it out, and stay tuned!

Check out side-by-side outputs generated on Arena from Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT-6 Sol by OpenAI. Scores for Claude Opus 5.5 are coming soon. Real-world tasks from our global community of users power the Arena leaderboards. Head to Arena now to test it out, and stay tuned!

Arena.ai

146,575 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

This is a demo of how far AI has come in game development. After 500+ hours of agent runtime, we built this recreation of Zelda: Ocarina of Time completely from scratch. Everything you're seeing in this video was made from scratch. No game engine used. Built with GPT 6 Astra, Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5.

This is a demo of how far AI has come in game development. After 500+ hours of agent runtime, we built this recreation of Zelda: Ocarina of Time completely from scratch. Everything you're seeing in this video was made from scratch. No game engine used. Built with GPT 6 Astra, Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5.

Leon Lin

665,773 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

You can now choose which model builds your app on Caffeine. The latest models are all in there: Opus 5.5 Fable 5.1 GPT-6 Astra GPT-6 Sol Kimi K3 Sonnet 5 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Plan a whole new app with a frontier model, then switch to a faster, cheaper one for quick questions and small changes. It works on every plan, starting today.

You can now choose which model builds your app on Caffeine. The latest models are all in there: Opus 5.5 Fable 5.1 GPT-6 Astra GPT-6 Sol Kimi K3 Sonnet 5 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Plan a whole new app with a frontier model, then switch to a faster, cheaper one for quick questions and small changes. It works on every plan, starting today.

caffeine

15,119 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

GPT-6 Astra smokes Claude Fable 5.1 in Blender 💨 We compared GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 on a Porsche 911 GT3 RS build and the difference is visible from the very first shot Output: Astra: $132.03 • 2.58 hours Fable: $114.41 • 2.56 hours Astra's model is not only more detailed in every aspect, but also far closer to the original car, costing almost the same as Fable's blocky funny looking model, the difference is astonishing

GPT-6 Astra smokes Claude Fable 5.1 in Blender 💨 We compared GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 on a Porsche 911 GT3 RS build and the difference is visible from the very first shot Output: Astra: $132.03 • 2.58 hours Fable: $114.41 • 2.56 hours Astra's model is not only more detailed in every aspect, but also far closer to the original car, costing almost the same as Fable's blocky funny looking model, the difference is astonishing

atomic.chat

132,877 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

A comparison of the mechanical butterfly Gemini 4 Pro made with GPT-6 Astra.. credits to Karan for the Astra output! Which one looks better guys? Gemini 4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra. I think they both look good in their own ways.. tho Gemini nailed the flying elegance and overall visuals.. I'll let you guys be the judge of this one!

A comparison of the mechanical butterfly Gemini 4 Pro made with GPT-6 Astra.. credits to Karan for the Astra output! Which one looks better guys? Gemini 4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra. I think they both look good in their own ways.. tho Gemini nailed the flying elegance and overall visuals.. I'll let you guys be the judge of this one!

Bee

149,139 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Claude Opus 5.5 meets Runway MCP. Connect Runway directly into Claude to generate polished images and videos with Gen-4.5, Seedance 2.5, GPT Image 2, Kling and more, right from where you work. Connect in seconds at the link below.

Claude Opus 5.5 meets Runway MCP. Connect Runway directly into Claude to generate polished images and videos with Gen-4.5, Seedance 2.5, GPT Image 2, Kling and more, right from where you work. Connect in seconds at the link below.

Runway

36,174 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen