正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Opus 5.5 actually shows the difference. I honestly expected less. One prompt: build the DeLorean and the clock tower square, rig the car, animate the lightning strike. Both models drove Blender through the Higgsfield Blender plugin and hooked with Higgsfield MCP, where it can use Nano Banana Pro for... show more

Stefan 3D AI

10,023 subscribers

21,447 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

13 条评论

Stefan 3D AI 的头像

Stefan 3D AI1 天前

The prompt explicitly allowed generating anything: images, 3D models, whatever they wanted. GPT-6 chose to generate nothing. Zero images, zero meshes. I even asked it afterwards, and yes, it really made none. Opus 5.5 spent $3.6 on generations total, and honestly the result just looks better.

Rubens Soto | AI & SaaS 的头像

Rubens Soto | AI & SaaS1 天前

For 3D modeling Opus 5.5 is really nice man, no way to Openai compete right now.

Phantom Terminal 的头像

Phantom Terminal1 天前

Blender mcp ?

I. Jovan 的头像

I. Jovan1 天前

That last line is the real result: Astra skipped the generator but still completed the scene. I’d want the next pass to log object-level failures and recovery time, not just tokens and API cost.

Arash 的头像

Arash1 天前

why astra didnt add the important end part ?

ElonBald 的头像

ElonBald1 天前

Seems like Opus 5.5 has an aesthetic sense that is pretty decent

𝐈𝐯𝐨 的头像

𝐈𝐯𝐨1 天前

"Curious what 'the difference' means exactly, is there a side by side with the previous model's attempt?"

Jun 的头像

Jun1 天前

gpt-6 building 517 objects itself makes the token comparison less clean

BlurstTewiter 🌊🌊 的头像

BlurstTewiter 🌊🌊1 天前

Ya you cant always go off the first try. Sometimes you just get a stupid GPU.

Tripo 的头像

Tripo1 天前

This Higgsfield MCP workflow is incredible. We love seeing Tripo integrated as a core node in these advanced agentic tests!

catman 的头像

catman1 天前

Same scene, different workshop: Opus used specialist generators, while Astra hand-built all 517 objects. That makes tool choice part of the benchmark, not just model quality.

Webster | JARVIS 的头像

Webster | JARVIS1 天前

Interesting that Astra skipped generators and built all objects itself. Opus landing the strike still sounds satisfying. Would you try a prompt with more handoff next?

michaellee8 的头像

michaellee81 天前

can opus 5.5 replace astra on blender use? i am looking to ditch my chatgpt $200 entirely since openai is dumbing down my models hard.

相关视频

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API terms. Feels like a worthy rival, and honestly I am glad about that. From what I watched, Opus juggles way more at once and is faster overall. Astra is still good imo.

First Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra test is 3D. One prompt, Blender only, all procedural. Render the 10-second shot, and record your own build timelapse. Opus 5.5: 35 min, 199.6k output tokens, about $13.3 in API terms. GPT-6 Astra: 28 min, 56.6k output tokens, about $14.5 in API terms. Feels like a worthy rival, and honestly I am glad about that. From what I watched, Opus juggles way more at once and is faster overall. Astra is still good imo.

Stefan 3D AI

458,031 次观看 • 2 天前

Guess the cartoon this scene is from. Opus 5.5 is great, but do not write GPT-6 off. This test asked for a fully procedural build of a rather famous scene, no imports, no generators. And here, to my eye, GPT-6 did it noticeably better. Both models ran on Max effort, both took about an 1.5h. Opus 5.5: 141 objects, 51-step build timelapse. GPT-6: 616 objects, 727-step build timelapse.

Guess the cartoon this scene is from. Opus 5.5 is great, but do not write GPT-6 off. This test asked for a fully procedural build of a rather famous scene, no imports, no generators. And here, to my eye, GPT-6 did it noticeably better. Both models ran on Max effort, both took about an 1.5h. Opus 5.5: 141 objects, 51-step build timelapse. GPT-6: 616 objects, 727-step build timelapse.

Stefan 3D AI

21,458 次观看 • 1 天前

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

151,709 次观看 • 1 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Emm | scenario.com

41,511 次观看 • 1 天前

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

J A Z I I

52,951 次观看 • 2 天前

GPT-6 Extra High vs. Kimi K3 Swarm - ECHO Start Menu Both models received the exact same prompt. I’m shocked at the quality Kimi K3 was able to output here. Its overall visual quality is above GPT-6’s and even above the menu from the actual game. However, it took significantly longer - around 3.5 hours versus GPT-6’s 42 minutes. Roughly 5× longer. GPT-6’s demo felt more realistic and stayed a lot closer to how the original menu looks. Kimi added something that GPT-6 missed, which was the interactive eye tracking. Kimi’s eyeball follows (albeit blurry and in a slightly weird way) where you click on the start screen. GPT-6’s doesn’t. • GPT-6 Extra High: approximately 46,000 generated output tokens - $2.30 in API-equivalent output cost. • Kimi K3 Swarm: estimated 250,000 generated output tokens - $3.75 in API-equivalent output cost.

GPT-6 Extra High vs. Kimi K3 Swarm - ECHO Start Menu Both models received the exact same prompt. I’m shocked at the quality Kimi K3 was able to output here. Its overall visual quality is above GPT-6’s and even above the menu from the actual game. However, it took significantly longer - around 3.5 hours versus GPT-6’s 42 minutes. Roughly 5× longer. GPT-6’s demo felt more realistic and stayed a lot closer to how the original menu looks. Kimi added something that GPT-6 missed, which was the interactive eye tracking. Kimi’s eyeball follows (albeit blurry and in a slightly weird way) where you click on the start screen. GPT-6’s doesn’t. • GPT-6 Extra High: approximately 46,000 generated output tokens - $2.30 in API-equivalent output cost. • Kimi K3 Swarm: estimated 250,000 generated output tokens - $3.75 in API-equivalent output cost.

Chris

120,153 次观看 • 18 天前

I bought ChatGPT plus ($20) I used GPT-6 Astra on "MAX" I gave it the task: "Integrate Supabase and Improve App UI" It worked for 40+ minutes! YES! The task wasn't done... These are the usage stats: - 100% 5 hr limit consumed - 16% weekly limit consumed - 5 Million tokens used - 50k Output Tokens For $20, where I can barely use Opus 5 for 20 minutes... I am getting GPT-6 Astra for 40 minutes is MORE than enough. BEST value you can get! Absolutly AMAZING!

I bought ChatGPT plus ($20) I used GPT-6 Astra on "MAX" I gave it the task: "Integrate Supabase and Improve App UI" It worked for 40+ minutes! YES! The task wasn't done... These are the usage stats: - 100% 5 hr limit consumed - 16% weekly limit consumed - 5 Million tokens used - 50k Output Tokens For $20, where I can barely use Opus 5 for 20 minutes... I am getting GPT-6 Astra for 40 minutes is MORE than enough. BEST value you can get! Absolutly AMAZING!

shownotover

198,706 次观看 • 18 天前

This AI created an interactive 3D textbook !! 💀 I didn't manually create any of these 3d models I built it using: 👉 GPT-6 Astra 👉 Hyper3D Rodin's MCP Hyper3D worked on the 3D Models And GPT-6 Astra made the website with the 3D Models integrated to the UI controls. It even added floating labels for the HEART !! This is what happens when an AI can actually CREATE 3D assets 👇

This AI created an interactive 3D textbook !! 💀 I didn't manually create any of these 3d models I built it using: 👉 GPT-6 Astra 👉 Hyper3D Rodin's MCP Hyper3D worked on the 3D Models And GPT-6 Astra made the website with the 3D Models integrated to the UI controls. It even added floating labels for the HEART !! This is what happens when an AI can actually CREATE 3D assets 👇

SARAH

135,934 次观看 • 12 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

atomic.chat

898,646 次观看 • 2 个月前

AGI is 100% solved. Prompt: "Take control of my computer using GPT-6 Astra and do the following: 1. design a character concept using Higgsfield Soul 2.0, 2. build a textured 3D model of it, 3. import it into Blender, 4. retopologize the mesh, 5. create a UV map, 6. build a character rig, 7. evaluate how production-ready the model is, 8. redo previous steps if you're not satisfied with results, 9. and then turn it into a cartoon using Seedance 2.5 on Higgsfield" Made in 30 minutes with GPT-6 Astra + Higgsfield MCP.

AGI is 100% solved. Prompt: "Take control of my computer using GPT-6 Astra and do the following: 1. design a character concept using Higgsfield Soul 2.0, 2. build a textured 3D model of it, 3. import it into Blender, 4. retopologize the mesh, 5. create a UV map, 6. build a character rig, 7. evaluate how production-ready the model is, 8. redo previous steps if you're not satisfied with results, 9. and then turn it into a cartoon using Seedance 2.5 on Higgsfield" Made in 30 minutes with GPT-6 Astra + Higgsfield MCP.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

163,238 次观看 • 18 天前

I think a lot of people are missing what GPT-6 can really do because they're using it out of the box. Give it the right free MCPs and skills, and it starts to feel like magic. Start with Blender MCP. In my tests, it works faster and uses fewer tokens than computer use. If you want to have fun with procedural modeling, go for it. For more detailed models, I use 3D generators and let GPT handle the processing, rigging and animation. You don't need to burn tokens making it build every detail from scratch. I've spent the last six months putting this setup together. These are the tools I actually use for Blender, Unity, Godot and Unreal, including my 3D generation tools. Full breakdown:

I think a lot of people are missing what GPT-6 can really do because they're using it out of the box. Give it the right free MCPs and skills, and it starts to feel like magic. Start with Blender MCP. In my tests, it works faster and uses fewer tokens than computer use. If you want to have fun with procedural modeling, go for it. For more detailed models, I use 3D generators and let GPT handle the processing, rigging and animation. You don't need to burn tokens making it build every detail from scratch. I've spent the last six months putting this setup together. These are the tools I actually use for Blender, Unity, Godot and Unreal, including my 3D generation tools. Full breakdown:

Stefan 3D AI

26,513 次观看 • 14 天前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT-6 is one of most noticable jumps you can't argue. And 3D is where it shows the hardest. I ran it through Blender few days: assembled a whole car from primitives, rigged and animated my quadruped creature, built a stylized island town and more. The full video with every test is out. My recommendation: run it through MCP. Computer Use is more of a fun demo, but with the right MCP tools it gets close to magic. If you don't want to wait forever and burn all your tokens, use the full setup. I break down mine in the video.

GPT-6 is one of most noticable jumps you can't argue. And 3D is where it shows the hardest. I ran it through Blender few days: assembled a whole car from primitives, rigged and animated my quadruped creature, built a stylized island town and more. The full video with every test is out. My recommendation: run it through MCP. Computer Use is more of a fun demo, but with the right MCP tools it gets close to magic. If you don't want to wait forever and burn all your tokens, use the full setup. I break down mine in the video.

Stefan 3D AI

39,362 次观看 • 17 天前

⚡️ JUST IN: MUSK LAUNCHES GROK 4.5, CALLING IT "OPUS-CLASS" AI MODEL Musk just released Grok 4.5 on Grok Build, Cursor, and the SpaceXAI Console, calling it an "Opus-class" AI model. He says it is faster, more token-efficient and lower cost, with EU access expected by mid-July. Built on a 1.5 TRILLION parameter foundation model, it drops the same day as OpenAI's GPT-5.6. API pricing is $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens.

⚡️ JUST IN: MUSK LAUNCHES GROK 4.5, CALLING IT "OPUS-CLASS" AI MODEL Musk just released Grok 4.5 on Grok Build, Cursor, and the SpaceXAI Console, calling it an "Opus-class" AI model. He says it is faster, more token-efficient and lower cost, with EU access expected by mid-July. Built on a 1.5 TRILLION parameter foundation model, it drops the same day as OpenAI's GPT-5.6. API pricing is $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens.

Coin Bureau

50,488 次观看 • 2 个月前

You don’t need to learn After Effects anymore. all you need to know is what you want to build GPT-6 Astra + higgsfield can turn a prompt into a GPU plugin directly inside AE. now you can build advanced 3D engines inside of AE allowing you to create insane 3D animations today I created complex 3D brain > individually animated neural connections > fully editable in AE. it took a prompt and a few hours for higgsfield + gpt-6 astra to ship the motion just type in Higgsfield AI 🧩 /use-after-effects in ChatGPT try now and share your best work

You don’t need to learn After Effects anymore. all you need to know is what you want to build GPT-6 Astra + higgsfield can turn a prompt into a GPU plugin directly inside AE. now you can build advanced 3D engines inside of AE allowing you to create insane 3D animations today I created complex 3D brain > individually animated neural connections > fully editable in AE. it took a prompt and a few hours for higgsfield + gpt-6 astra to ship the motion just type in Higgsfield AI 🧩 /use-after-effects in ChatGPT try now and share your best work

Axultan

17,920 次观看 • 12 天前

I can't believe this worked! I saw the new poster for Neuromancer and thought: "What a cool font! Can I recreate it with AI?" I went to ChatGPT using GPT-6 Astra, and I gave the poster and this prompt: "Create a full font similar to the one in the attached poster, and animate a showcase presentation for the font using the Higgsfield plugin" It even did two versions of the font: Regular and Signal Fully usable, perfectly working fonts. It took 13m 19s to make all of this.

I can't believe this worked! I saw the new poster for Neuromancer and thought: "What a cool font! Can I recreate it with AI?" I went to ChatGPT using GPT-6 Astra, and I gave the poster and this prompt: "Create a full font similar to the one in the attached poster, and animate a showcase presentation for the font using the Higgsfield plugin" It even did two versions of the font: Regular and Signal Fully usable, perfectly working fonts. It took 13m 19s to make all of this.

Alex Patrascu

23,054 次观看 • 16 天前

You don’t need to learn After Effects anymore. All you need to know is what you want to build GPT-6 Astra + Higgsfield can turn a prompt into a GPU plugin directly inside AE. Now you can build advanced 3D engines inside of AE allowing you to create insane 3D animations Today we created complex 3D brain > individually animated neural connections > fully editable in AE. It took a prompt and a few hours for Higgsfield + GPT-6 astra to ship the motion Just type in Higgsfield AI 🧩 /use-after-effects in ChatGPT Try now and share your best work.

You don’t need to learn After Effects anymore. All you need to know is what you want to build GPT-6 Astra + Higgsfield can turn a prompt into a GPU plugin directly inside AE. Now you can build advanced 3D engines inside of AE allowing you to create insane 3D animations Today we created complex 3D brain > individually animated neural connections > fully editable in AE. It took a prompt and a few hours for Higgsfield + GPT-6 astra to ship the motion Just type in Higgsfield AI 🧩 /use-after-effects in ChatGPT Try now and share your best work.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

112,131 次观看 • 12 天前

THIS GUY BUILT A HABBO HOTEL CLONE IN 2 HOURS WITH GPT-6 ASTRA he didn't use a game engine, blender, 3d models, or asset packs > astra spun up a local site on his pc > built the entire thing in svgs and javascript > every character, every piece of furniture, the floors, the walls, all vector shapes drawn in code > isometric rooms and animated avatars > lighting, shadows and depth all faked in 2d he ran astra ultra at 2x speed and it ate about 42% of his weekly usage on the $100 pro plan so roughly $42 and one afternoon assets were always the issue in the 3d space (you either learned blender or you paid someone) now you can literally describe it and it draws itself

THIS GUY BUILT A HABBO HOTEL CLONE IN 2 HOURS WITH GPT-6 ASTRA he didn't use a game engine, blender, 3d models, or asset packs > astra spun up a local site on his pc > built the entire thing in svgs and javascript > every character, every piece of furniture, the floors, the walls, all vector shapes drawn in code > isometric rooms and animated avatars > lighting, shadows and depth all faked in 2d he ran astra ultra at 2x speed and it ate about 42% of his weekly usage on the $100 pro plan so roughly $42 and one afternoon assets were always the issue in the 3d space (you either learned blender or you paid someone) now you can literally describe it and it draws itself

Om Patel

20,949 次观看 • 18 天前

GPT-6 Astra can already plan, code, and build. The more interesting question is what happens when it can call a dedicated 3D tool at the exact moment a project needs an asset. So we connected Hyper3D Rodin MCP and asked Astra to build an interactive Solar System Explorer. Astra handled the app logic and integration. When it needed 3D models, it called Hyper3D Rodin directly. Hyper3D Rodin generated the required assets, and Astra brought them back into the project and continued building from there. That is where the workflow gets useful. Instead of stopping to search for assets or creating them manually, Astra can keep moving while Hyper3D handles the specialized 3D generation, with more control over the output and assets that are easier to integrate into the final project. The result is a browser-based solar system where the generated 3D models are part of the actual experience, not just outputs sitting in a model viewer.

GPT-6 Astra can already plan, code, and build. The more interesting question is what happens when it can call a dedicated 3D tool at the exact moment a project needs an asset. So we connected Hyper3D Rodin MCP and asked Astra to build an interactive Solar System Explorer. Astra handled the app logic and integration. When it needed 3D models, it called Hyper3D Rodin directly. Hyper3D Rodin generated the required assets, and Astra brought them back into the project and continued building from there. That is where the workflow gets useful. Instead of stopping to search for assets or creating them manually, Astra can keep moving while Hyper3D handles the specialized 3D generation, with more control over the output and assets that are easier to integrate into the final project. The result is a browser-based solar system where the generated 3D models are part of the actual experience, not just outputs sitting in a model viewer.

GitHub Projects Community

11,097 次观看 • 14 天前

I used to think 3D was way too much work for a quick creative idea Then I tried this workflow in MiniMax Design GPT-6 Astra can work with Blender to build the 3D scene from a natural-language prompt, which honestly changes how I think about 3D creation I don’t need to start by figuring out every Blender operation myself I can just describe the scene I have in mind and let Astra handle the technical side Then I can take that 3D result straight into H3 Max Turbo and turn it into a video And the speed here is no joke 15s video → 20s generation Starting at $0.018/s That makes experimenting with different ideas feel so much less expensive in terms of time But the more I use MiniMax Design, the more I realize 3D is only one part of it GPT Image 2.5 opens up another route — generate the visuals and storyboards first, then use H3 Max Turbo to bring those shots together into a video So now I’m basically playing with two different creative paths: Astra + Blender → 3D → H3 Max Turbo GPT Image 2.5 → Storyboard → H3 Max Turbo And having all of these connected inside MiniMax Design makes the whole process feel much more flexible Honestly, I started this just wanting to see what Astra could do with 3D Now I’m way more curious about what happens when I start mixing all these workflows together

I used to think 3D was way too much work for a quick creative idea Then I tried this workflow in MiniMax Design GPT-6 Astra can work with Blender to build the 3D scene from a natural-language prompt, which honestly changes how I think about 3D creation I don’t need to start by figuring out every Blender operation myself I can just describe the scene I have in mind and let Astra handle the technical side Then I can take that 3D result straight into H3 Max Turbo and turn it into a video And the speed here is no joke 15s video → 20s generation Starting at $0.018/s That makes experimenting with different ideas feel so much less expensive in terms of time But the more I use MiniMax Design, the more I realize 3D is only one part of it GPT Image 2.5 opens up another route — generate the visuals and storyboards first, then use H3 Max Turbo to bring those shots together into a video So now I’m basically playing with two different creative paths: Astra + Blender → 3D → H3 Max Turbo GPT Image 2.5 → Storyboard → H3 Max Turbo And having all of these connected inside MiniMax Design makes the whole process feel much more flexible Honestly, I started this just wanting to see what Astra could do with 3D Now I’m way more curious about what happens when I start mixing all these workflows together

haytam

83,103 次观看 • 13 天前