Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"It is highly likely the COVID vaccines were a significant factor in the recent cancer cases within the British royal family." This explosive statement comes from one of Britain's most eminent oncologists, Professor Angus Dalgleish, as reported by prominent cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra. It underscores a watershed moment in...

33,025 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

Humanspective

19,440 views • 2 years ago

New Analysis: 2-4x Greater Risk of Serious Harm from mRNA Vaccine Than COVID Hospitalization A bombshell re-examination of the original Pfizer and Moderna trial data has reached a conclusion that demands urgent public attention. According to renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an independent study published in Vaccine (2022) found a staggering inverse risk-benefit profile. The analysis, led by experts including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, revealed that during the trials, an individual was two to four times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event—defined as disability, life-changing injury, or hospitalization—from the mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID-19. This critical research is now central to the argument that the vaccines may have caused more net harm than good. Dr. Malhotra suggests that had this independent analysis been possible before emergency authorization—without the influence of industry-funded regulators—the vaccines may not have been approved for a single person. This data is no longer just a scientific discussion; it is actively shaping policy, informing recent actions by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within the U.S. HHS. It points to a catastrophic failure in the risk-benefit analysis that underpinned global mandates. The imperative now is a full, transparent, and independent review of all data. The public health establishment must be held accountable for decisions made on flawed premises.

Camus

22,222 views • 10 months ago

Disturbing data from an Italian study of nearly 300,000 individuals reveals a significant increase in cancer risk post-COVID vaccination. Dr. John Campbell breaks down the alarming findings: • The rate of first cancer hospitalization in the UNvaccinated cohort was 0.85%. • In the VACCINATED cohort, the rate jumped to 1.15%—a concerning and statistically significant increase. This wasn't a fluke. The results have a p-value of <0.001, meaning there's less than a 1 in 1000 chance this happened by random chance. Why is this happening? Dr. Campbell outlines plausible biological mechanisms: • Ongoing spike protein production driving chronic inflammation, a known precursor to cancer. • DNA contamination in the vaccines, potentially inhibiting tumor suppressor genes. • Frameshifting from pseudouridine, creating rogue proteins that can cause cellular damage and mutation. The most damning part? This crucial data is being withheld from the public in the UK and other Western nations. Our governments are depriving scientists of the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed data needed to perform this exact analysis. This lack of transparency is, in Dr. Campbell's view, "quite outrageous" and compromises a potential cover-up. This Italian province's data is a canary in the coal mine. If these figures are extrapolated to populations of 50 million or more, the implications are staggering. We are being kept in the dark. It is time to demand transparency. It is time to demand the data.

Camus

62,673 views • 10 months ago

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.

Camus

46,957 views • 10 months ago

Colon Cancer in 8-Year-Olds. Pancreatic Cancer in 13-Year-Olds. Dr. Soon-Shiong's Chilling Explanation: The Spike Protein. A stark and urgent warning from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong: The medical establishment's singular focus on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, both in vaccine design and viral understanding, may have catastrophic long-term consequences, including a looming cancer crisis in younger populations. In a revealing discussion, Dr. Soon-Shiong articulates a critical question that has been largely ignored: Why did we develop vaccines that do not clear the virus and that are based solely on the virus's most pathogenic component—the spike protein? He introduces the concept of "spikeopathy"—the pathological damage caused by the spike protein itself, whether from the virus or from mRNA vaccines. The central, terrifying hypothesis is that the spike protein may not be inert. If it can persist and replicate within the body, it could potentially suppress crucial tumor-suppressor proteins like P53. This is not mere speculation for Dr. Soon-Shiong. He directly links this mechanism to the alarming and unprecedented rise in early-age cancers he is witnessing clinically. He asks the question the entire world should be asking: Is the spike protein a ticking time bomb, acting similarly to known oncoviruses like HPV and Hepatitis? Could this be the explanation for the inexplicable: 8-year-olds with colon cancer? 13-year-olds with metastatic pancreatic cancer? Dr. Soon-Shiong believes these are not anomalies but potential harbingers of a future wave of spike-driven oncogenesis. This is no longer just a debate about vaccine efficacy vs. COVID-19. This is a warning about a potential iatrogenic contribution to a future pandemic of cancer. The questions he raises are among the most important of our time. The scientific and medical community must address them with transparency and urgency. The health of a generation may depend on it.

Camus

207,185 views • 10 months ago