Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

It’s absolutely criminal when doctors don’t fully inform patients about the downstream effects of taking cholesterol blocking drugs. Dr. Stephen Hussey, DC explains how these drugs can interrupt basic biological processes.

Cary Kelly

88,961 subscribers

48,583 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dr Aseem Malhotra says the quiet part out loud!! ‘Most of these pills for chronic disease whether its cholesterol lowering drugs, blood pressure pills, diabetes drugs actually don’t improve outcomes for most people taking them.’ The entire medical profession needs to be revamped.

Dr Aseem Malhotra says the quiet part out loud!! ‘Most of these pills for chronic disease whether its cholesterol lowering drugs, blood pressure pills, diabetes drugs actually don’t improve outcomes for most people taking them.’ The entire medical profession needs to be revamped.

Kat A 🌸

63,806 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

RFK Jr. says withdrawals from SSRIs are worse than heroin. Millions of Americans taking these drugs may not know what they’re actually signing up for. Many patients are never fully told about the potential side effects, the risk of emotional blunting, or how difficult it can be to come off these medications once they start. For some people, getting off SSRIs becomes a years-long battle that requires careful tapering and can leave lasting harm when done incorrectly. Yet these drugs continue to be prescribed to millions of Americans every year. 1 in 6 American adults is taking an SSRI. Yet most people have never heard the true data behind these drugs.

RFK Jr. says withdrawals from SSRIs are worse than heroin. Millions of Americans taking these drugs may not know what they’re actually signing up for. Many patients are never fully told about the potential side effects, the risk of emotional blunting, or how difficult it can be to come off these medications once they start. For some people, getting off SSRIs becomes a years-long battle that requires careful tapering and can leave lasting harm when done incorrectly. Yet these drugs continue to be prescribed to millions of Americans every year. 1 in 6 American adults is taking an SSRI. Yet most people have never heard the true data behind these drugs.

Joshua Philipp

25,253 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Professor Peter Gøtzsche estimates that “prescription drugs are the leading cause of death, ahead of heart disease and cancer.” “Psychiatric drugs … are the third-leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer.” “It would be better if we took all [psychiatric drugs] off the market.” “The way people use psychiatric drugs definitely causes much more harm than benefit.” “Psychiatric drugs can be useful in acute situations … but doctors often use psychiatric drugs for many years to the same patients, and that’s definitely harmful.” “The mantra is that drugs are safe and effective.” “This is an impossibility.” “If a drug has benefits, it will always harm some people, so nothing can be both safe and effective.” “It’s only a question about how frequent are the harms and how serious are they compared to the benefits.” Dr. Josef Prof. Peter C Gøtzsche

Professor Peter Gøtzsche estimates that “prescription drugs are the leading cause of death, ahead of heart disease and cancer.” “Psychiatric drugs … are the third-leading cause of death, after heart disease and cancer.” “It would be better if we took all [psychiatric drugs] off the market.” “The way people use psychiatric drugs definitely causes much more harm than benefit.” “Psychiatric drugs can be useful in acute situations … but doctors often use psychiatric drugs for many years to the same patients, and that’s definitely harmful.” “The mantra is that drugs are safe and effective.” “This is an impossibility.” “If a drug has benefits, it will always harm some people, so nothing can be both safe and effective.” “It’s only a question about how frequent are the harms and how serious are they compared to the benefits.” Dr. Josef Prof. Peter C Gøtzsche

Holden Culotta

35,622 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Dr. Eric Berg shares disturbing statistics about the number of children being prescribed SSRIs. “People don’t realize… we have millions of kids starting these drugs.” “A child’s brain is not a small adult’s brain.” “Between the ages of 8 and 25, that brain is actively under construction.” “So when you introduce an SSRI during that time frame… it alters the construction of the foundation of the brain itself.” “A child who starts these drugs at 10 years old may never develop the full emotional range.” Dr. Eric Berg DC

Dr. Eric Berg shares disturbing statistics about the number of children being prescribed SSRIs. “People don’t realize… we have millions of kids starting these drugs.” “A child’s brain is not a small adult’s brain.” “Between the ages of 8 and 25, that brain is actively under construction.” “So when you introduce an SSRI during that time frame… it alters the construction of the foundation of the brain itself.” “A child who starts these drugs at 10 years old may never develop the full emotional range.” Dr. Eric Berg DC

MAHA Action

36,405 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

New episode of HARD DRUGS! Should everyone be taking statins? Statins have revolutionised heart disease and they're one of many reasons for the long-term decline in cardiovascular mortality. Clinical trials suggest that the more you reduce LDL cholesterol levels, the more you reduce the risks of heart attacks and strokes, with no signal of harms even at the lowest levels. So scientists recommend the earlier they're taken the better, and the lower LDL levels you reach the better. Statins do have some rare side effects – such as muscle weakness and muscle loss in rare cases – but meta-analyses of RCTs find that most other side effects listed on statins' labels do not actually have higher risks than placebo. In this episode, Jacob Trefethen and I chat about all this and much more! - Why it took almost a century for scientists to come to consensus on "the lipid hypothesis": that higher levels of plasma LDL cholesterol causes higher risks of heart disease and that reducing it saves lives. - Drugs that effectively reduce cholesterol levels beyond the effect of statins, such as PCSK9 inhibitors, most of which are monoclonal antibodies, as well as newer siRNA drugs and the macrocyclic peptide enlicitide, which recently completed phase 3 trials, and Lp(a) drugs. - What the future holds for cholesterol drugs Timestamps: 0:00:00 Introduction 13:35 The decline in heart disease mortality 31:02 Surprising cholesterol trivia 55:40 The lipid hypothesis: 7 lines of evidence for the harms of LDL cholesterol 1:22:15 How cholesterol works 1:30:40 The discovery of statins 1:48:44 Should everyone be on statins? 1:57:10 PCSK9 drugs and beyond 2:22:56 Summary: how we got here and the future of cholesterol drugs Watch, listen, or read wherever you get your podcasts. Spotify: Apple: YouTube: Transcript:

New episode of HARD DRUGS! Should everyone be taking statins? Statins have revolutionised heart disease and they're one of many reasons for the long-term decline in cardiovascular mortality. Clinical trials suggest that the more you reduce LDL cholesterol levels, the more you reduce the risks of heart attacks and strokes, with no signal of harms even at the lowest levels. So scientists recommend the earlier they're taken the better, and the lower LDL levels you reach the better. Statins do have some rare side effects – such as muscle weakness and muscle loss in rare cases – but meta-analyses of RCTs find that most other side effects listed on statins' labels do not actually have higher risks than placebo. In this episode, Jacob Trefethen and I chat about all this and much more! - Why it took almost a century for scientists to come to consensus on "the lipid hypothesis": that higher levels of plasma LDL cholesterol causes higher risks of heart disease and that reducing it saves lives. - Drugs that effectively reduce cholesterol levels beyond the effect of statins, such as PCSK9 inhibitors, most of which are monoclonal antibodies, as well as newer siRNA drugs and the macrocyclic peptide enlicitide, which recently completed phase 3 trials, and Lp(a) drugs. - What the future holds for cholesterol drugs Timestamps: 0:00:00 Introduction 13:35 The decline in heart disease mortality 31:02 Surprising cholesterol trivia 55:40 The lipid hypothesis: 7 lines of evidence for the harms of LDL cholesterol 1:22:15 How cholesterol works 1:30:40 The discovery of statins 1:48:44 Should everyone be on statins? 1:57:10 PCSK9 drugs and beyond 2:22:56 Summary: how we got here and the future of cholesterol drugs Watch, listen, or read wherever you get your podcasts. Spotify: Apple: YouTube: Transcript:

Saloni

734,864 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Cisplatin is one of the most effective cancer drugs we have — but it comes with a tough tradeoff: permanent hearing loss in up to half of patients who receive it. NIH scientists led by Dr. Lisa Cunningham are testing whether a common cholesterol drug, atorvastatin, can reduce that risk in randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Learn more about the trial:

Cisplatin is one of the most effective cancer drugs we have — but it comes with a tough tradeoff: permanent hearing loss in up to half of patients who receive it. NIH scientists led by Dr. Lisa Cunningham are testing whether a common cholesterol drug, atorvastatin, can reduce that risk in randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Learn more about the trial:

NIH

24,060 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Perhaps the most important and honest part of Anderson Cooper and Sara Sidner CNN’s documentary last night on what’s happened to San Francisco. It’s a simple truth. If we want to fix San Francisco, we need to get rid of the drugs. “I don’t think it’s the housing that encourages them to come, I think it’s the cheap drugs, I think it’s hearing about what you can buy for how much money and how you can use outside and not get arrested.”

Perhaps the most important and honest part of Anderson Cooper and Sara Sidner CNN’s documentary last night on what’s happened to San Francisco. It’s a simple truth. If we want to fix San Francisco, we need to get rid of the drugs. “I don’t think it’s the housing that encourages them to come, I think it’s the cheap drugs, I think it’s hearing about what you can buy for how much money and how you can use outside and not get arrested.”

Thomas Hawk

156,056 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨 DOCTORS JUST ADMITTED THEY DON’T FULLY UNDERSTAND HOW ANESTHESIA WORKS — “NOBODY REALLY KNOWS” On camera, a doctor is asked: “How does anesthesia work at the most basic level?” His answer: “We’re still learning.” “There’s a joke that nobody really knows.” Then he explains what they do know… Most anesthetics work through GABA, slowing the brain down by inhibiting neural activity. But with drugs like propofol, they can push patients into something called burst suppression. What is that? Brain activity gets suppressed so hard, you only see a tiny electrical spike every 6 to 10 seconds Not normal sleep. Not dreaming. His words: “Anesthesia is not sleep.” They can chemically slow your brain to near silence, and still don’t fully understand how it works. Does that make you think twice about going under?

🚨 DOCTORS JUST ADMITTED THEY DON’T FULLY UNDERSTAND HOW ANESTHESIA WORKS — “NOBODY REALLY KNOWS” On camera, a doctor is asked: “How does anesthesia work at the most basic level?” His answer: “We’re still learning.” “There’s a joke that nobody really knows.” Then he explains what they do know… Most anesthetics work through GABA, slowing the brain down by inhibiting neural activity. But with drugs like propofol, they can push patients into something called burst suppression. What is that? Brain activity gets suppressed so hard, you only see a tiny electrical spike every 6 to 10 seconds Not normal sleep. Not dreaming. His words: “Anesthesia is not sleep.” They can chemically slow your brain to near silence, and still don’t fully understand how it works. Does that make you think twice about going under?

HustleBitch

29,805 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposes statins: A 1% benefit with hidden costs—time for informed consent Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a renowned cardiologist, has raised critical concerns about statins, one of the most prescribed drugs globally, with 30 million users in the U.S. and up to a billion worldwide. In a recent discussion, he unpacked the shocking truth about their efficacy, urging patients to question the widespread use of these cholesterol-lowering medications. Drawing from industry-sponsored trial data, Dr. Malhotra highlights that for most people—those not at high risk of heart attack—taking a statin daily for five years offers just a 1% chance of preventing a non-fatal heart attack or non-disabling stroke. Critically, this comes with no evidence of prolonging life by even a single day. He emphasizes that this information, available at is rarely communicated to patients due to systemic gaps in medical training, where doctors are not taught to interpret and convey such data effectively. Dr. Malhotra advocates for informed consent, presenting patients with these facts without coercion. Many, he notes, are dismayed by the minimal benefit when weighed against potential side effects, which affect 20-50% of users. These include muscle pain, fatigue, brain fog, erectile dysfunction, joint pain, and stomach issues. Strikingly, he has witnessed elderly patients misdiagnosed with dementia or frailty regain memory and vitality weeks after discontinuing statins. This is not a call to stop medication abruptly, but a plea for patients to engage in informed discussions with their doctors. Dr. Malhotra’s book, A Statin-Free Life, available on Amazon, delves deeper into these findings, offering a comprehensive resource for those seeking clarity on cholesterol management and drug benefits. For evidence-based insights on statins and other medications, visit Dr. Malhotra’s mission is clear: empower patients with knowledge to make health decisions that align with their values and quality of life.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposes statins: A 1% benefit with hidden costs—time for informed consent Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a renowned cardiologist, has raised critical concerns about statins, one of the most prescribed drugs globally, with 30 million users in the U.S. and up to a billion worldwide. In a recent discussion, he unpacked the shocking truth about their efficacy, urging patients to question the widespread use of these cholesterol-lowering medications. Drawing from industry-sponsored trial data, Dr. Malhotra highlights that for most people—those not at high risk of heart attack—taking a statin daily for five years offers just a 1% chance of preventing a non-fatal heart attack or non-disabling stroke. Critically, this comes with no evidence of prolonging life by even a single day. He emphasizes that this information, available at is rarely communicated to patients due to systemic gaps in medical training, where doctors are not taught to interpret and convey such data effectively. Dr. Malhotra advocates for informed consent, presenting patients with these facts without coercion. Many, he notes, are dismayed by the minimal benefit when weighed against potential side effects, which affect 20-50% of users. These include muscle pain, fatigue, brain fog, erectile dysfunction, joint pain, and stomach issues. Strikingly, he has witnessed elderly patients misdiagnosed with dementia or frailty regain memory and vitality weeks after discontinuing statins. This is not a call to stop medication abruptly, but a plea for patients to engage in informed discussions with their doctors. Dr. Malhotra’s book, A Statin-Free Life, available on Amazon, delves deeper into these findings, offering a comprehensive resource for those seeking clarity on cholesterol management and drug benefits. For evidence-based insights on statins and other medications, visit Dr. Malhotra’s mission is clear: empower patients with knowledge to make health decisions that align with their values and quality of life.

Camus

107,694 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Jake Scott became Legacy Media’s chosen “expert”. He helped develop the guidelines which included Anthony Fauci’s Remdesivir... and had to be walked through how messenger RNA worked by a Senator. Stunning when you consider some Doctors treated thousands of people with repurposed drugs and didn’t lose a single patient. Dr. Jake Scott: “I lost many, many nursing home folks... and multiple a day sometimes.... I helped develop the guidelines.. yeah we used Remdesivir... ” Sen. Ron Johnson: “Mr Scott, how much do you know about the mRNA technology??” Cheap repurposed drugs safely administered billions of times were cast aside as expensive drugs were fast tracked to the front line.

Dr. Jake Scott became Legacy Media’s chosen “expert”. He helped develop the guidelines which included Anthony Fauci’s Remdesivir... and had to be walked through how messenger RNA worked by a Senator. Stunning when you consider some Doctors treated thousands of people with repurposed drugs and didn’t lose a single patient. Dr. Jake Scott: “I lost many, many nursing home folks... and multiple a day sometimes.... I helped develop the guidelines.. yeah we used Remdesivir... ” Sen. Ron Johnson: “Mr Scott, how much do you know about the mRNA technology??” Cheap repurposed drugs safely administered billions of times were cast aside as expensive drugs were fast tracked to the front line.

Humanspective

23,249 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The term “side effect” is a marketing term. It trains people to view adverse effects as minor inconveniences instead of recognizing them as direct effects of taking a prescribed drug. When a drug causes weight gain, sexual dysfunction, emotional numbing, or withdrawal, those are primary effects. To make true choices about whether to start or stop a psychiatric drug, we need to be able to think with straightforward, honest language. This isn’t possible when marketing departments of drug companies distort our capacity to meaningfully understand the potential adverse effects of these drugs.

The term “side effect” is a marketing term. It trains people to view adverse effects as minor inconveniences instead of recognizing them as direct effects of taking a prescribed drug. When a drug causes weight gain, sexual dysfunction, emotional numbing, or withdrawal, those are primary effects. To make true choices about whether to start or stop a psychiatric drug, we need to be able to think with straightforward, honest language. This isn’t possible when marketing departments of drug companies distort our capacity to meaningfully understand the potential adverse effects of these drugs.

Laura Delano

15,735 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

First, they scammed you on skin cancer when the sun is good for you. Now, they're scamming you again on cholesterol to sell you a lifetime medication. This entire narrative of cholesterol being the villain in heart disease was built on a lie. What doctors fail to tell you is that the sugar industry bribed scientists to shift the blame for heart disease from sugar to cholesterol. This has been revealed by internal documents that have surfaced. The result? A massive push for statins, now taken by 35% of Americans over 40, with devastating consequences. Studies now show that after five years of daily use, the average person gains only three to four extra days of life—just a few days for a lifetime of potential harm. Even more alarming, 20% of statin users suffer serious injuries like muscle deterioration, liver damage, and nerve dysfunction. Statins are well known for having a high percentage of patients discontinue the drugs due to side effects. Two separate studies have found nearly half of people stop taking statins within a year. The evidence is clear: statins are not the life-saving drugs we’ve been told they are. Still don’t believe it? Watch Jimmy Dore break down this article by A Midwestern Doctor—and prepare to become livid at what you learn. Over 40 million Americans are on statins. It’s time they learned what these drugs are really doing. 🧵

First, they scammed you on skin cancer when the sun is good for you. Now, they're scamming you again on cholesterol to sell you a lifetime medication. This entire narrative of cholesterol being the villain in heart disease was built on a lie. What doctors fail to tell you is that the sugar industry bribed scientists to shift the blame for heart disease from sugar to cholesterol. This has been revealed by internal documents that have surfaced. The result? A massive push for statins, now taken by 35% of Americans over 40, with devastating consequences. Studies now show that after five years of daily use, the average person gains only three to four extra days of life—just a few days for a lifetime of potential harm. Even more alarming, 20% of statin users suffer serious injuries like muscle deterioration, liver damage, and nerve dysfunction. Statins are well known for having a high percentage of patients discontinue the drugs due to side effects. Two separate studies have found nearly half of people stop taking statins within a year. The evidence is clear: statins are not the life-saving drugs we’ve been told they are. Still don’t believe it? Watch Jimmy Dore break down this article by A Midwestern Doctor—and prepare to become livid at what you learn. Over 40 million Americans are on statins. It’s time they learned what these drugs are really doing. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

335,954 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

If you care about your health, it’s critical to become aware of how existing (approved) meds can prevent, treat, or even cure various diseases… and yet the medical profession is largely unaware of these. Dr David Fagjenbaum MD explains, & what he is doing about it.

If you care about your health, it’s critical to become aware of how existing (approved) meds can prevent, treat, or even cure various diseases… and yet the medical profession is largely unaware of these. Dr David Fagjenbaum MD explains, & what he is doing about it.

Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

105,442 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

In an interview, Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, a distinguished breast cancer surgeon, author, and inventor, shared groundbreaking insights on repurposed drugs for cancer treatment. She discussed how medications like ivermectin, mebendazole, sildenafil, metformin, aspirin, doxycycline, and vitamin C show promise in targeting cancer stem cells, the drivers of tumor regrowth. “Cancer stem cells are the real bad boys,” Dr. Ruddy stated, explaining that chemotherapy and radiation often fail to eliminate them, leading to cancer recurrence. Preclinical studies show combinations like doxycycline and vitamin C can eradicate over 90% of cancer stem cells, with doxycycline, azithromycin, and vitamin C proving equally effective. These affordable, FDA-approved drugs could halt tumors without harming patients. Dr. Ruddy praised Dr. Paul Marik’s Cancer Care monograph as a must-read for its analysis of repurposed drugs. Her mission is to cure cancer, not manage it as a chronic disease. “Patients want to live without cancer,” she emphasized. Through her work, she’s studying these therapies’ impact on cancers like breast, prostate, and lung. “Kill the cancer, or the cancer will kill you,” Dr. Ruddy urged. Could repurposed drugs transform cancer care?

In an interview, Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, a distinguished breast cancer surgeon, author, and inventor, shared groundbreaking insights on repurposed drugs for cancer treatment. She discussed how medications like ivermectin, mebendazole, sildenafil, metformin, aspirin, doxycycline, and vitamin C show promise in targeting cancer stem cells, the drivers of tumor regrowth. “Cancer stem cells are the real bad boys,” Dr. Ruddy stated, explaining that chemotherapy and radiation often fail to eliminate them, leading to cancer recurrence. Preclinical studies show combinations like doxycycline and vitamin C can eradicate over 90% of cancer stem cells, with doxycycline, azithromycin, and vitamin C proving equally effective. These affordable, FDA-approved drugs could halt tumors without harming patients. Dr. Ruddy praised Dr. Paul Marik’s Cancer Care monograph as a must-read for its analysis of repurposed drugs. Her mission is to cure cancer, not manage it as a chronic disease. “Patients want to live without cancer,” she emphasized. Through her work, she’s studying these therapies’ impact on cancers like breast, prostate, and lung. “Kill the cancer, or the cancer will kill you,” Dr. Ruddy urged. Could repurposed drugs transform cancer care?

Camus

117,774 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ranvir Singh, "Are you still as a party in favour of legalising drugs, and how would that benefit society?" Zack Polanski, "Yes we are. This benefits society because the war on drugs is failing. It's pushing people with addiction to drugs into back alleys, that's fuelling gangs able to sell these drugs" Ranvir Singh, "Legalising gives out a message.. That's a big shift in society" Zack Polanski, "There would be a big shift in society under a Green Party leadership, because we're not a Labour party" "If someone has an addictive relationship with drugs that they're on the black market, taking it without knowing what's in it" "Or would you rather with a public health profession who helps them get off that drugs" "I think it's obvious we take a public health approach to drugs" Why were Ranvir Singh and Kate Garraway smiling when Zack Polanski was talking about legally getting people off of drugs?

Ranvir Singh, "Are you still as a party in favour of legalising drugs, and how would that benefit society?" Zack Polanski, "Yes we are. This benefits society because the war on drugs is failing. It's pushing people with addiction to drugs into back alleys, that's fuelling gangs able to sell these drugs" Ranvir Singh, "Legalising gives out a message.. That's a big shift in society" Zack Polanski, "There would be a big shift in society under a Green Party leadership, because we're not a Labour party" "If someone has an addictive relationship with drugs that they're on the black market, taking it without knowing what's in it" "Or would you rather with a public health profession who helps them get off that drugs" "I think it's obvious we take a public health approach to drugs" Why were Ranvir Singh and Kate Garraway smiling when Zack Polanski was talking about legally getting people off of drugs?

Farrukh

124,657 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад