Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

It's amazing how a cop could be so wrong, but still try to double down. This officer pulled this guy over claiming he could not see his plate. The driver confused about why, goes out there to look. Listen to what the officer says. But then has the nerve... show more

Chuckling Charlie

28,874 subscribers

95,405 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Watch this officer get caught up. This guy gets pulled over and little did the officer know, he has a dash cam. The officer claimed he pulled him over for running a red light. However things change quick once he finds out there was a cam that recorded everything. If you don't have a dash cam, you need to get one. You will be happy you have one when the time comes you need it.

Watch this officer get caught up. This guy gets pulled over and little did the officer know, he has a dash cam. The officer claimed he pulled him over for running a red light. However things change quick once he finds out there was a cam that recorded everything. If you don't have a dash cam, you need to get one. You will be happy you have one when the time comes you need it.

Chuckling Charlie

343,586 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This guy gets this officer caught out. Dude backed down real quick. I've said it before and I'll say it again. If you don't have a dash cam I highly suggest investing in one. You never know when you will need it, but I promise you that day comes you will be very happy that you made that investment to get one.

This guy gets this officer caught out. Dude backed down real quick. I've said it before and I'll say it again. If you don't have a dash cam I highly suggest investing in one. You never know when you will need it, but I promise you that day comes you will be very happy that you made that investment to get one.

Giggling Ganon

25,587 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A Portland police officer threatens a ICE thug with arrest if he continues to try to drive through a crowd of protesters and police! Listen to what the thug says to him about not caring and then how there aren’t to many protesters so it won’t be messy! 🤬

A Portland police officer threatens a ICE thug with arrest if he continues to try to drive through a crowd of protesters and police! Listen to what the thug says to him about not caring and then how there aren’t to many protesters so it won’t be messy! 🤬

Suzie rizzio

802,512 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Stephen A. Smith says he will never be married because he couldn't be faithful and didn't know how to act Host: "If you know so much about marriage then why have you never been married?" Stephen: "Because I didn't know how to act" Host: "is it your fault?" Stephen: "Totally my fault and It's not anybody's fault but mine...I was on the road over 200 days out of the year. I'm not going to be faithful being on the road 200 days out of the year" "This is the part that men don't reveal that much but I will do it is that when you get older you don't need it anymore so you don't chase. That's entirely different from when it's handed to you on a silver platter. It doesn't mean you can't say no. It means it's harder"

Stephen A. Smith says he will never be married because he couldn't be faithful and didn't know how to act Host: "If you know so much about marriage then why have you never been married?" Stephen: "Because I didn't know how to act" Host: "is it your fault?" Stephen: "Totally my fault and It's not anybody's fault but mine...I was on the road over 200 days out of the year. I'm not going to be faithful being on the road 200 days out of the year" "This is the part that men don't reveal that much but I will do it is that when you get older you don't need it anymore so you don't chase. That's entirely different from when it's handed to you on a silver platter. It doesn't mean you can't say no. It means it's harder"

CreativeDude

847,851 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Can you say this to your teammates. Try it. Try being that guy. It's easy to turn on TV and see how crazy good he is. But others could be also if they had the mindset to outwork everyone. Winners win at EVERYTHING

Can you say this to your teammates. Try it. Try being that guy. It's easy to turn on TV and see how crazy good he is. But others could be also if they had the mindset to outwork everyone. Winners win at EVERYTHING

matt pierce

769,640 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?

Dude rips into tyrant officer who lied about the reason he pulled him over. The video starts with Officer Nablo pulling over a motorcyclist right outside his own home. Right out of the gate, the officer asks didn't you hear me when I was trying to pull you over? The rider said no, because he has a Bluetooth speaker in his helmet. The officer falsely claims having helmet speakers is illegal (spoiler: it’s not). So this was off to a wonderful start. When the rider directly asks, "Why are you pulling me over first?" the officer completely deflects, stating it's simply "to ID who you are." That is a massive red flag. Officers need reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime to initiate a traffic stop—they cannot just pull you over to demand papers and see who you are. It isn't until long after the confrontation begins, after the officer has already demanded ID, that he walks to the back of the motorcycle to look for a retroactive justification. He then tries to claim that the plate has to be visible and says he can't see the plate. The rider pushes back calling out it officer for lying. After getting the ID and running the plate the officer did happen to get lucky as he discovered the vehicle registration expired , meaning it is expired. The rider immediately calls out the absolute hypocrisy and shifting narrative: The officer first claimed he couldn't see the license plate at all. Yet, the officer simultaneously claimed he pulled the rider over because he knew the registration on that very plate was expired. How can you pull someone over for an expired plate that you just admitted you couldn't even see until after you detached him from the bike? It makes zero sense. Failure to Yield or Safe Stopping Point? Officer Nablo tries to claim the rider was "failing to yield" and evading the stop because he didn't pull over the exact second the lights went on. However, the rider stands his ground, explaining that he did not flee; he simply continued riding a short distance to his own home where he felt safe and where he had multiple security cameras recording the interaction. This doesn't seem to be a random encounter, either. The rider alleges a disturbing pattern of personal harassment from Officer Nablo, claiming this exact same officer previously came onto his property and threatened to shoot his dog just for barking inside the house. Eventually, a supervisor/sergeant steps in to de-escalate the hostile officer. The supervisor confirms that the citations for the expired registration will be sent by mail and that the rider has 10 days to contest them. When the rider demands to file a formal complaint for harassment, the supervisor instructs him that individual officer complaints must be taken up directly with the Chief of Police. The rider made it clear this is going straight to court and social media. What do you think? Was this officer legitimately enforcing traffic laws, or was he a tyrant fishing for a reason to flex his badge?

Giggling Ganon

724,872 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Cop pulls family a 1.5 month old baby out of their car at gunpoint because he mistyped their plate in the computer. A vehicle, carrying a driver, his girlfriend, and their 1.5-month-old infant, was flagged as stolen out of Little Rock. Officers ordered the driver out with his hands up and immediately placed him in handcuffs and into his car. As backup arrived guns were drawn as they ordered his wife out of the car as well at gunpoint. The issue? The vehicle wasn’t stolen at all. The driver’s plate read APX 55X while the plate stolen ended in a Y. This was discovered when the backup officer took it upon himself to call in the plate to double check it. The officer that conducted the stop did zero investigation and could not even take a min to double check the plate before pulling people out with his firearm drawn. The same officer had the nerve to blame the high-stress stop on modern Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR / Flock) camera technology, claiming the automated reader misread the final letter due to scanning angles. However, records and dispatch logs raise critical questions about standard operating procedure: why wasn't the tag visually verified and double-checked against dispatch before drawing weapons and detaining an innocent family? Also there is no mention on the logs of a Flock camera getting a hit and dispatch alerting this officer. This was him making that mistake and now passing the blame on the camera/ AI. If this guy is going to have this level of integrity over something like this, what else has he lied about over the years?

Cop pulls family a 1.5 month old baby out of their car at gunpoint because he mistyped their plate in the computer. A vehicle, carrying a driver, his girlfriend, and their 1.5-month-old infant, was flagged as stolen out of Little Rock. Officers ordered the driver out with his hands up and immediately placed him in handcuffs and into his car. As backup arrived guns were drawn as they ordered his wife out of the car as well at gunpoint. The issue? The vehicle wasn’t stolen at all. The driver’s plate read APX 55X while the plate stolen ended in a Y. This was discovered when the backup officer took it upon himself to call in the plate to double check it. The officer that conducted the stop did zero investigation and could not even take a min to double check the plate before pulling people out with his firearm drawn. The same officer had the nerve to blame the high-stress stop on modern Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR / Flock) camera technology, claiming the automated reader misread the final letter due to scanning angles. However, records and dispatch logs raise critical questions about standard operating procedure: why wasn't the tag visually verified and double-checked against dispatch before drawing weapons and detaining an innocent family? Also there is no mention on the logs of a Flock camera getting a hit and dispatch alerting this officer. This was him making that mistake and now passing the blame on the camera/ AI. If this guy is going to have this level of integrity over something like this, what else has he lied about over the years?

Giggling Ganon

204,162 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

This man got pulled over for a traffic stop in another state while driving home. The officer asked him for his information, the man gave it to him. The officer came back, gave him the ticket, told him where to appear if he wanted to contest and pointed out where he could mail in the fee for the ticket since he didn’t live nearby. The man said okay. The officer asked if he had any questions, the man said no, the officer said be safe and that was that. So many people said that is a normal interaction with police officers. All the other stuff is someone seeking attention. 💯 It should be this easy every time. Kudos to both those men. 👏 When you do what you are asked to do, there is never a problem, imho. Is this how your traffic stops have went? (Mine did) Why can’t they all be like this for everyone?

This man got pulled over for a traffic stop in another state while driving home. The officer asked him for his information, the man gave it to him. The officer came back, gave him the ticket, told him where to appear if he wanted to contest and pointed out where he could mail in the fee for the ticket since he didn’t live nearby. The man said okay. The officer asked if he had any questions, the man said no, the officer said be safe and that was that. So many people said that is a normal interaction with police officers. All the other stuff is someone seeking attention. 💯 It should be this easy every time. Kudos to both those men. 👏 When you do what you are asked to do, there is never a problem, imho. Is this how your traffic stops have went? (Mine did) Why can’t they all be like this for everyone?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

77,679 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

chan talked about tattoos after noticing it would look well with his buttoned shirt! 🐺 that looks clean. in this state, if you do tattoos like this... i'll probably be scolded (laughs) I want to get a tattoo but I have no thoughts of getting one. you get what I mean, right? I want to and I want to try it but I have no thoughts of doing it. so in the end? I won't do it. you don't have to worry~ but I could, right? it's just my opinion

chan talked about tattoos after noticing it would look well with his buttoned shirt! 🐺 that looks clean. in this state, if you do tattoos like this... i'll probably be scolded (laughs) I want to get a tattoo but I have no thoughts of getting one. you get what I mean, right? I want to and I want to try it but I have no thoughts of doing it. so in the end? I won't do it. you don't have to worry~ but I could, right? it's just my opinion

ellie ✦

78,625 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

An off duty officer decided he wanted to play cop and perform traffic duty while once again not on duty. Looks to me like he let his own road rage get the best of him leading to what he did to this man. This is why I keep saying, make sure you have a dash cam. How would this have gone without one?

An off duty officer decided he wanted to play cop and perform traffic duty while once again not on duty. Looks to me like he let his own road rage get the best of him leading to what he did to this man. This is why I keep saying, make sure you have a dash cam. How would this have gone without one?

Chuckling Charlie

20,089 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

If people actually took the time to listen to this woman and understand her, maybe the world could be a better place. But of course, some will still try to argue with facts. They won’t get anywhere, but they’ll still most certainly try.

If people actually took the time to listen to this woman and understand her, maybe the world could be a better place. But of course, some will still try to argue with facts. They won’t get anywhere, but they’ll still most certainly try.

Blondenotblind

11,348 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

193,866 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🎥 || Sebastian Vettel about what a win in Ferrari could mean to Lewis Hamilton. “The longer it takes, the harder it becomes.” “But I mentioned the example of 2021 and Lewis' character. You know, he has the incredible ability to reflect the situation he's in now, struggles he might have. And I think he's still in a point of his life where this is what he wants to do.” “I think he has a fair shot from his performance. But a lot of things need to come together. You need to have the team, you need to have the people, you need to, the timing needs to be on the sweet spot so it would be great. And I think he deserves if it comes together but we will find out.”

🎥 || Sebastian Vettel about what a win in Ferrari could mean to Lewis Hamilton. “The longer it takes, the harder it becomes.” “But I mentioned the example of 2021 and Lewis' character. You know, he has the incredible ability to reflect the situation he's in now, struggles he might have. And I think he's still in a point of his life where this is what he wants to do.” “I think he has a fair shot from his performance. But a lot of things need to come together. You need to have the team, you need to have the people, you need to, the timing needs to be on the sweet spot so it would be great. And I think he deserves if it comes together but we will find out.”

sin ⁴⁴

54,006 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨Cop has to STOP his partner from groping woman's vagina during a traffic stop "He's training. He's a new officer. With male officer's, it's supposed to be the back of the hand" All this because the officer said he "smelled Marijuana."

🚨Cop has to STOP his partner from groping woman's vagina during a traffic stop "He's training. He's a new officer. With male officer's, it's supposed to be the back of the hand" All this because the officer said he "smelled Marijuana."

Police The Police 2.0

75,317 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This is exactly why body cameras matter… and why objective reality still wins. A woman steals from a store. An officer tells her to come to him. She bolts. Runs out the door. Sprints down the sidewalk. Turns around to look back at the officer… …and smashes face-first into a bright, shiny metal pole she never saw coming. Teeth gone. Immediate injury. Then comes the lie. She claims the officer did it. Here’s the hard truth… if that body cam wasn’t rolling, that officer’s life would be upside down right now. Lawsuit. Suspension. Media narrative. Career damage. All based on a false accusation. But cameras don’t have emotions. They don’t negotiate reality. They don’t bend for grievance. They record what actually happened. This is why facts matter. This is why footage matters. This is why accountability cuts both ways. You don’t get to rewrite physics. You don’t get to outrun consequences. And you don’t get to lie your way out when the truth is on video. Objective reality always shows up… even when people try to run from it. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

This is exactly why body cameras matter… and why objective reality still wins. A woman steals from a store. An officer tells her to come to him. She bolts. Runs out the door. Sprints down the sidewalk. Turns around to look back at the officer… …and smashes face-first into a bright, shiny metal pole she never saw coming. Teeth gone. Immediate injury. Then comes the lie. She claims the officer did it. Here’s the hard truth… if that body cam wasn’t rolling, that officer’s life would be upside down right now. Lawsuit. Suspension. Media narrative. Career damage. All based on a false accusation. But cameras don’t have emotions. They don’t negotiate reality. They don’t bend for grievance. They record what actually happened. This is why facts matter. This is why footage matters. This is why accountability cuts both ways. You don’t get to rewrite physics. You don’t get to outrun consequences. And you don’t get to lie your way out when the truth is on video. Objective reality always shows up… even when people try to run from it. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

1,486,615 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The reason that this extra diverse doctor lawyer equal does not respond as normal to simple explanations has to do with theory of mind. The police officer explains six times that she caused an accident and now has to provide her insurance. The diverse equal knows that she caused the accident. She remembers it from mere moments ago. However, the police officer was not there during the accident. She did not see him there. Therefore, according to diversity mathematics, the police officer could not possibly know that there was an accident at all. How could he? He did not see it. Or rather, she did not see him seeing it. "If I did not see the police officer looking at me as I caused an accident, then he does not know that I caused an accident. I know this because I am unable to know anything that I did not personally witness, and so that is how everybody's mind works." In the vibrant mind of the diversity, everything that does not happen in front of a person's eyes is a confusing mess that is impossible to understand. There simply is no way to ascertain that something happened if you did not see it before your eyes. That is why this extra diverse value contributor believes that the police officer is similarly confused. "It should be easy to get away with lying about this accident," she calculated, diversely. "He ain't see nothin.'" That is why, when he insists that the accident did in fact occur, she has no choice but to perceive this as racism. How could it not be? Every other diverse equal that she has ever lied to in a similar fashion has been easily confused, and let her go after committing similar crimes. So in the mind of the diversity, "black people always let me go when I lie, but white people never do, so white people must just be evil racists." We are truly enriched by the genius of these builders of civilization

The reason that this extra diverse doctor lawyer equal does not respond as normal to simple explanations has to do with theory of mind. The police officer explains six times that she caused an accident and now has to provide her insurance. The diverse equal knows that she caused the accident. She remembers it from mere moments ago. However, the police officer was not there during the accident. She did not see him there. Therefore, according to diversity mathematics, the police officer could not possibly know that there was an accident at all. How could he? He did not see it. Or rather, she did not see him seeing it. "If I did not see the police officer looking at me as I caused an accident, then he does not know that I caused an accident. I know this because I am unable to know anything that I did not personally witness, and so that is how everybody's mind works." In the vibrant mind of the diversity, everything that does not happen in front of a person's eyes is a confusing mess that is impossible to understand. There simply is no way to ascertain that something happened if you did not see it before your eyes. That is why this extra diverse value contributor believes that the police officer is similarly confused. "It should be easy to get away with lying about this accident," she calculated, diversely. "He ain't see nothin.'" That is why, when he insists that the accident did in fact occur, she has no choice but to perceive this as racism. How could it not be? Every other diverse equal that she has ever lied to in a similar fashion has been easily confused, and let her go after committing similar crimes. So in the mind of the diversity, "black people always let me go when I lie, but white people never do, so white people must just be evil racists." We are truly enriched by the genius of these builders of civilization

hoe_math = PsychoMath

232,770 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Here’s what’s going to be really interesting about Tom Aspinall signing with Eddie Hearn: There are times when the UFC calls up fighters and says, 'We’re not talking to your manager. If you want this fight, if you want this deal, you’re going to have to talk to us.' So the UFC could just say, 'We’re not talking to you.' Then Tom could say, 'Well, if you’re not talking to him, you’re not talking to me.' There’s going to be a game of chicken here. Tom’s not a free agent. He’s the champion. We all know how long it takes to get out of a contract. So this is going to be a fascinating story to follow.

Here’s what’s going to be really interesting about Tom Aspinall signing with Eddie Hearn: There are times when the UFC calls up fighters and says, 'We’re not talking to your manager. If you want this fight, if you want this deal, you’re going to have to talk to us.' So the UFC could just say, 'We’re not talking to you.' Then Tom could say, 'Well, if you’re not talking to him, you’re not talking to me.' There’s going to be a game of chicken here. Tom’s not a free agent. He’s the champion. We all know how long it takes to get out of a contract. So this is going to be a fascinating story to follow.

Ariel Helwani

261,615 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Growing indoor cucmbers: I like this but I'd have to look up how to pollinate because he didn't explain that . It appears that he used cinnamon to fight bacteria but I could be wrong. It's worth a try

Growing indoor cucmbers: I like this but I'd have to look up how to pollinate because he didn't explain that . It appears that he used cinnamon to fight bacteria but I could be wrong. It's worth a try

!Nspirenaire〽️

40,805 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce