正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

It’s literally the difference between designing a place around cars or not.

1,213,992 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

CyberMonk 的头像
CyberMonk1 年前

In America, you have to drive the equivalence of three European countries to get to a grocery store.

LibertarianUrbanPlanner 的头像
LibertarianUrbanPlanner1 年前

No, it’s touristy places and not. I can do the same thing for the reverse. In fact, i’ll do it

Hayden 的头像
Hayden1 年前

Do it for Michigan please.

Donal 的头像
Donal1 年前

To be strictly fair, the highway from Milan to Turin does look exactly like the 2nd part of this vid; Italy has their Autostrada, they just don’t run them right through the heart of their downtowns.

ray 的头像
ray1 年前

Why are urbanists so: a) annoying b) unable to understand basic logic

Dan 的头像
Dan1 年前

Ever been to Europe, mate? Those large highways are 5 minutes away from the cherrypicked tourist attractions in the video.

Mark Ashworth 的头像
Mark Ashworth1 年前

Literally built before cars existed.

TF384 的头像
TF3841 年前

Walkable cities or towns are just more lively and chic

Debbie Dingell Stan🇺🇦🇬🇪⬜️🟥⬜️ 的头像
Debbie Dingell Stan🇺🇦🇬🇪⬜️🟥⬜️1 年前

But have you considered being more dependent on oil?

Rishi Ramaraju 的头像
Rishi Ramaraju1 年前

The centers of European cities are old and often predate the automobile. If you go just outside their walkable centers, you will see extensive parking lots and highway interchanges (ex: Naples and Barcelona). The modern economy is not possible without modern infrastructure.

相关视频