Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I’ve been testing Qoder, and the biggest difference I noticed is that it feels less like asking an AI to write code and more like handing an AI agent an actual task. I started from Qoder’s new task screen, described the outcome I wanted, selected my workspace, model, and...

251,390 просмотров • 9 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 19

Фото профиля Ethan Cole AI
Ethan Cole AI9 дней назад

Try Qoder free with 600 Credits 👇 300 from the Pro trial + 300 with my code C46T6F.

Фото профиля NeuraFlow AI
NeuraFlow AI8 дней назад

Qwen3.8-Flash at 0x credits is definitely worth testing before September 30

Фото профиля Lacoste AI | Tools
Lacoste AI | Tools8 дней назад

Agentic coding tools are getting seriously impressive lately

Фото профиля Olivia Reed
Olivia Reed8 дней назад

600 credits for new users is actually pretty generous

Фото профиля Erina | AI Tools & News
Erina | AI Tools & News9 дней назад

This is the shift: stop prompting for code, start assigning work.

Фото профиля Md. Robius Sany
Md. Robius Sany9 дней назад

Awesome share

Фото профиля David
David9 дней назад

Excellent share thanks

Фото профиля COMMON AI
COMMON AI9 дней назад

Excellent Share

Фото профиля Antonio Costa | IA
Antonio Costa | IA8 дней назад

This feels much closer to delegating work than just prompting an AI

Фото профиля Chloe Wells
Chloe Wells9 дней назад

Thanks it’s really nice share

Фото профиля Arcane Matrix | AI
Arcane Matrix | AI9 дней назад

Qoder is insane

Фото профиля Ai With Piyas
Ai With Piyas9 дней назад

Excellent share

Фото профиля Onil Coder
Onil Coder9 дней назад

Appreciate you sharing this.

Фото профиля Theo Builds AI
Theo Builds AI8 дней назад

The ability to pause, redirect, or take over is exactly what these coding agents need

Фото профиля Nova IA
Nova IA8 дней назад

Being able to watch the agent work and step in when needed is a big plus

Фото профиля Justin Brave💡
Justin Brave💡9 дней назад

Impressive work. Thanks for sharing your perspective.

Фото профиля SynapseOps AI
SynapseOps AI8 дней назад

Seeing the planning and execution process makes it way easier to trust the result

Фото профиля rockcovenant
rockcovenant8 дней назад

Do my dzs

Фото профиля Alex Carter AI
Alex Carter AI8 дней назад

The verification step at the end is probably the part I like most

Похожие видео

I wanted to see if an AI agent could take one goal all the way to a finished artifact. I gave Qoder a weekly competitor-tracking task. I started on the task screen, selected my workspace, left the model on Auto, set permissions, and sent the outcome instead of a step-by-step prompt. Qoder read the context and began planning. Rather than one generic research pass, it ran subagents for Cursor, Windsurf and GitHub Copilot in parallel. I watched them check public updates and bring their findings back into the main task. The work was visible: planning, tool calls, terminal commands, file changes and progress updates. It did not feel like another chat answer. It felt like watching a task move through an actual workflow. The final artifact was competitor-weekly-2026-09-22.md It summarized the week's highlights and included sources and caveats, including where public evidence was limited. That made the output reviewable: I could check the sources, question the conclusions, and decide what to do next. That is the part I care about. Qoder is a desktop AI agent you can hand an outcome as a task. It reads context, plans, uses tools, executes and verifies. You can watch, adjust, pause or take over. One goal → planning → parallel research → terminal work → verified Markdown report. In the model picker, Qwen3.8-Flash was showing 0.0x Credits through September 30, so that option was available at zero cost during the offer. If you want to try it, Qoder has a 14-day Pro trial with 300 Credits. Sign up first using this link at before you download. That adds another 300 Credits, for 600 total.

Nelly;

159,865 просмотров • 13 дней назад

I wanted to see if an AI agent could take one business task all the way to a verified artifact, so I gave Qoder a real one. In General mode, I selected the Business Data Analysis workspace, chose Qwen3.8-Flash from the model picker, enabled full access, and asked it to analyze every file in the folder and build an executive performance report for Jul 1-Sep 20, 2026. The brief included KPIs, revenue, gross profit, margins, monthly trends, regional and product performance, target attainment, marketing efficiency, customer mix, weighted CRM pipeline, anomalies, and charts. Qoder planned the task, read the source files, and ran terminal commands. It hit real issues: a broken NumPy environment, old folder paths, inaccurate claims, and chart label collisions. It switched to a working Python stack, repaired the scripts, corrected a "2x October target" claim to September, fixed a "2:1" product-tier claim that was actually 1.5:1, and re-ran the validate -> metrics -> charts -> report pipeline. The Browser Use step was the proof: Qoder opened the generated HTML, captured screenshots, and checked that the charts rendered correctly. The final report showed $450,635 net revenue, $311,262 gross profit, 69.1% gross margin, 937 orders, and $1.101M weighted pipeline from 120 open opportunities. That is the difference between a chat answer and an agent workflow: I could inspect the actions, challenge the output, and verify the result. Qwen3.8-Flash was at 0.0x Credits through Sep 30. Sign up first using this link at before you download. You will get 600 Credits: 300 from the trial and 300 from my code.

JAYDEN™

158,041 просмотров • 9 дней назад

AI agents are moving past the point where generating an answer is enough. The real question is whether an agent can stay inside a real environment long enough to actually finish the job. That’s what makes Nex-N2.5 interesting to me It is built around long-horizon computer use, with agents that can operate browsers and software, execute programs, see the results through visual feedback, and keep correcting their work instead of stopping at the first output. Nex-N2.5 Pro was put through exactly that kind of workflow: build a SQL interpreter, write tests, run it, identify what was missing, implement the next pieces, and keep iterating. The model progressively handled things like WHERE, JOIN, subqueries, qualified names and table aliases while testing its own implementation along the way. That is the difference I care about with agentic AI. The agent isn't just producing an artifact. It's operating inside a feedback loop: write → run → inspect the result → fix the problem → verify again. Nex-N2.5 is also released as a family of Mini, Pro and Max models, giving developers different options depending on the task and deployment requirements. The Nex-N2.5 Mini and Pro are both available through OpenRouter for free for a limited time: Try it out here: The real shift isn't just better AI outputs. It’s agents that can interact with an environment, respond to what happens, and keep working until the task is actually finished.

Mide

20,759 просмотров • 25 дней назад