Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

AI coding tools are great at generating code. But can an AI agent take a vague idea, understand the whole project, make decisions, write the code, run it, test it, and actually turn it into something usable? I put EvoX Agent through a real-world task to find out. Here’s...

73,008 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

38 Comments

Jay Bisen's profile picture
Jay Bisen1 month ago

EvoX Agent goes beyond coding; it can research, analyze, execute, and create. It can turn complex tasks into structured workflows and handle them end to end. With reusable skills and multi-agent collaboration, it keeps getting more capable. One agent, multiple workflows, less tool-hopping.

Jay Bisen's profile picture
Jay Bisen1 month ago

I gave EvoX Agent a challenge that went beyond simple coding: Build a realistic tornado animation with dynamic movement and effects. It figured out the logic, built the experience, and brought the concept to life without me having to manually connect every piece.

Jay Bisen's profile picture
Jay Bisen1 month ago

I wanted to test EvoX on something completely different: Analyze BTC’s price performance throughout July. It processed the data, identified the key price movements, and turned everything into a clear, dynamic chart. Raw market data → actionable insights at a glance.

Jay Bisen's profile picture
Jay Bisen1 month ago

Curious what EvoX can do with your own data? Turn raw information into clear insights, charts, and useful outputs. Put it to the test on your next project. Try EvoX Agent Beta ↓

Al Tech World's profile picture
Al Tech World1 month ago

AI that can actually execute and validate its own work is a very different proposition from autocomplete.

Sanskriti Naruka's profile picture
Sanskriti Naruka1 month ago

Loved seeing EvoX turn a vague idea into a working tornado animation and a clean BTC chart that’s the kind of end-to-end agent that actually ships usable work.

Harsh Pawar's profile picture
Harsh Pawar1 month ago

Definitely an interesting direction. The shift from “AI writes code” to “AI completes projects” is happening fast.

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack's profile picture
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 month ago

@JayBisen473370 I hit that roadblock building my own thing. Real challenge is balancing AI decisions with user intent. Curious how EvoX Agent handles this!

Minds That Build's profile picture
Minds That Build1 month ago

This feels much closer to having an AI teammate than having a simple coding assistant.

The Ant Philosophy's profile picture
The Ant Philosophy1 month ago

The BTC analysis example shows how useful agents can be beyond traditional software development.

Daily Wisdom's profile picture
Daily Wisdom1 month ago

“Less tool-hopping” is honestly one of the biggest benefits of this approach.

Life Mastery's profile picture
Life Mastery1 month ago

The real test for AI isn’t whether it can generate code. It’s whether it can turn an idea into something that actually works.

Shweta singh's profile picture
Shweta singh1 month ago

The combination of creativity and data analysis in these examples is pretty compelling.

Wise Philosophy's profile picture
Wise Philosophy1 month ago

The ability to research, reason, execute, and iterate in one workflow is where things get interesting.

Amir Ansari's profile picture
Amir Ansari1 month ago

Less switching between coding, research, analysis, and visualization could save a lot of time.

Apex Mentality's profile picture
Apex Mentality1 month ago

AI agents are becoming less about writing snippets and more about completing actual tasks.

Aiden Tech's profile picture
Aiden Tech1 month ago

Great share

marium's profile picture
marium1 month ago

That's a great question. Curious to see how EvoX Agent performed on this real-world task!

Mind Yeti's profile picture
Mind Yeti1 month ago

I like the idea of testing an agent with completely different types of tasks. That’s a much better benchmark.

Arish Ai's profile picture
Arish Ai1 month ago

There’s a big difference between an AI that writes code and one that can actually complete a task.

Ismail Khan's profile picture
Ismail Khan1 month ago

Building a sustainable habit routine with rewards and fallbacks sounds like a solid test case. Can't wait to see the final output!

Holland Tech Marco's profile picture
Holland Tech Marco1 month ago

That tornado demo is a surprisingly good stress test for an AI agent.

Amaxa AI's profile picture
Amaxa AI1 month ago

This is the real test for AI coding agents—not just writing code, but understanding the goal, making decisions, testing, and actually shipping something usable. 🔥 If you want, I can also �⁠make it **shorter, �⁠more viral, or �⁠more natural for X**.

Meenakshi Yadav's profile picture
Meenakshi Yadav1 month ago

The BTC chart example is a nice reminder that AI agents can be useful for data tasks too, not just coding.

Manish Kumar Shah's profile picture
Manish Kumar Shah1 month ago

The real benchmark will be consistency. Can it produce reliable results across completely different projects?

Onil Coder's profile picture
Onil Coder1 month ago

Really impressive. Looking forward to what's next.

Edwin | AI Systems's profile picture
Edwin | AI Systems1 month ago

The interesting part isn't the happy path. It's what happens when the agent hits a flaky test or a bad assumption mid-run. Did EvoX recover without a human restart, or was it one clean shot?

Christopher Riley's profile picture
Christopher Riley1 month ago

That's great update

0xZubair 🃏's profile picture
0xZubair 🃏1 month ago

cool test to see if it can actually ship something

Maria Watson's profile picture
Maria Watson1 month ago

We’re moving from “AI can write code” to a much bigger question: “What can AI actually build and complete?”

Aiden Tech's profile picture
Aiden Tech1 month ago

Build it, run it, test it” is a very different level of AI capability than simply completing code.

Flix Muller's profile picture
Flix Muller1 month ago

Feels like we’re getting closer to AI that can actually own a development workflow.

pushkar soni's profile picture
pushkar soni1 month ago

It would be interesting to see the same agent take an existing project, find the problems, and improve it autonomously.

Roxo's profile picture
Roxo1 month ago

Noce share

peter's profile picture
peter1 month ago

Amazing share

shobhanai's profile picture
shobhanai1 month ago

Great share

Mark's profile picture
Mark1 month ago

Great post

Dhruv kumar's profile picture
Dhruv kumar1 month ago

This is the real test for AI. Most tools can write a snippet, but managing an entire workflow independently is a huge leap. Excited to see how EvoX Agent handled it!

Related Videos

Bash is all you need! Which is why I'm introducing my holiday project: just-bash just-bash is a pretty complete implementation of bash in TypeScript designed to be used as a bash tool by AI agents. Because it turns out agents love exploring data via shell scripts, even beyond coding. It comes with grep, sed, awk and the 99th percentile features that an agent like Claude Code or Cursor would use. In fact, Claude Code can use it for secure bash execution. In the package - A bash-tool for AI SDK - A binary for use by yourself or your coding agents - An overlay filesystem to feed files to your agent securely - A Vercel Sandbox compatible API, so you can quickly upgrade to a real VM if you need to run binaries - An example AI agent that explores the just-bash code base using just-bash - I imported the Oils shell bash compatibility suite and just-bash passes a very good chunk What is interesting about this codebase: It was essentially entirely written by Opus 4.5. Coding agents love bash and they are good at reproducing it. They are also great at text-book recursive descent parsers and AST tweet-walk interpreters. That said, it is, like, a lot of code and I didn't read it all 😅. This is very much a hack, but it also seems to be _really_ useful. I haven't really found anything agents want to use that it doesn't support and it's fast and secure (caveats apply). It doesn't have write access to your computer and the filesystem is given a root that the agent cannot escape from. Find it at Related: Our recent blog post how we migrated our data analysis agent to bash tools and achieved incredible quality improvements The video shows the example agent investigating the just-bash code base

Malte Ubl

125,326 views • 10 months ago

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.

DegenCalls

20,124 views • 4 months ago