正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I've been thinking about this decision of "DEATHLOOP" every now and then. It's quite ironic people say it has no replay value, because it was designed to be a game that players "replay" so much in a focused period of time, and it'll be okay if they never come... show more

Sinnoware 451

4,664 subscribers

676,928 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Don’t be scared to call it a classic, it checks every box: hits, impact, and real replay value. Meanwhile they rushing to label that Clipse album a “classic” with none of that… no hits, no staying power. Definition of came and went.

Don’t be scared to call it a classic, it checks every box: hits, impact, and real replay value. Meanwhile they rushing to label that Clipse album a “classic” with none of that… no hits, no staying power. Definition of came and went.

Karabo

36,848 次观看 • 3 个月前

You know.......I got to thinking about it the last couple days......LET'S SAY.......IF Richard is telling the truth, and he was seen on Feb 10th, before the image was released, and never seen in area again......... WHAT IF........He was coming from the west or south from her house, with a Backpack......what if he was dumping some stuff that is and has NOW been found by JIM? It would NOT have been there when SAR DOGS checked the area......and they have NEVER checked again......SO it makes sense that "IN PLAIN SIGHT" could be.......somewhere they checked.....scratch off the map, and then come dump in that area........and then it is in plain site but missed!!! BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN CHECKED!!!

You know.......I got to thinking about it the last couple days......LET'S SAY.......IF Richard is telling the truth, and he was seen on Feb 10th, before the image was released, and never seen in area again......... WHAT IF........He was coming from the west or south from her house, with a Backpack......what if he was dumping some stuff that is and has NOW been found by JIM? It would NOT have been there when SAR DOGS checked the area......and they have NEVER checked again......SO it makes sense that "IN PLAIN SIGHT" could be.......somewhere they checked.....scratch off the map, and then come dump in that area........and then it is in plain site but missed!!! BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN CHECKED!!!

Capt KEVman!!!

26,155 次观看 • 3 个月前

"If we love this game we have to grow it to it's potential.. I've been in this game a long time and baseball offers so much" ~ BorasCorp #PMSLive

"If we love this game we have to grow it to it's potential.. I've been in this game a long time and baseball offers so much" ~ BorasCorp #PMSLive

Pat McAfee

80,575 次观看 • 4 个月前

"If we do our job right, nobody cares about privacy anymore. It won't be a topic, not because we gave up, but because it'll just be by design in every blockchain transaction" Rand, founder of Zama, on why the goal is to make privacy something you never think about "Privacy has become one of the hot topics again. In the earlier crypto days it was probably one of the main topics, then we went through all these crazy bubbles and people seem to have forgotten about it, I guess because they were making so much money at the time. But it seems we've come home" "I've been in crypto since 2013, this is my fourth or fifth cycle. What changed, and this was our bet at Zama, is that we saw institutions, banks, people wanting to use blockchain for finance, and privacy was a missing element. People are excited about privacy today not because of the original cypherpunk ideals we had initially, but because finance requires it, and because people are excited about trillions moving onchain" "It's like your browser. There's this small lock when you connect to a website, the connection is encrypted, and you don't think about it. We have to do the same for blockchain transactions, it'll just be there by design"

"If we do our job right, nobody cares about privacy anymore. It won't be a topic, not because we gave up, but because it'll just be by design in every blockchain transaction" Rand, founder of Zama, on why the goal is to make privacy something you never think about "Privacy has become one of the hot topics again. In the earlier crypto days it was probably one of the main topics, then we went through all these crazy bubbles and people seem to have forgotten about it, I guess because they were making so much money at the time. But it seems we've come home" "I've been in crypto since 2013, this is my fourth or fifth cycle. What changed, and this was our bet at Zama, is that we saw institutions, banks, people wanting to use blockchain for finance, and privacy was a missing element. People are excited about privacy today not because of the original cypherpunk ideals we had initially, but because finance requires it, and because people are excited about trillions moving onchain" "It's like your browser. There's this small lock when you connect to a website, the connection is encrypted, and you don't think about it. We have to do the same for blockchain transactions, it'll just be there by design"

The Wolf Of All Streets

64,382 次观看 • 7 天前

If they got the right people to do it, a Halo show/movie focused on ODSTs would be a huge hit and it baffles me that it's never been tried before

If they got the right people to do it, a Halo show/movie focused on ODSTs would be a huge hit and it baffles me that it's never been tried before

MA5K CEO

18,980 次观看 • 1 年前

This dude was estranged from part of his family during the COVID days for not getting the jab. It’s been four years, and they’ve decided to invite him back to join the family for the holidays, but he won’t be joining them. I think this guy has it right. So much was exposed in that short period of time and it can never be taken back.

This dude was estranged from part of his family during the COVID days for not getting the jab. It’s been four years, and they’ve decided to invite him back to join the family for the holidays, but he won’t be joining them. I think this guy has it right. So much was exposed in that short period of time and it can never be taken back.

One Bad Dude

108,112 次观看 • 8 个月前

is it crazy to say that jumpout is the first album to genuinely have the wlr effect because why am i seeing mfs say it’s his best now and i lowk agree ts has so much replay value

is it crazy to say that jumpout is the first album to genuinely have the wlr effect because why am i seeing mfs say it’s his best now and i lowk agree ts has so much replay value

tq

26,556 次观看 • 5 个月前

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 次观看 • 7 个月前

Tez Johnson on playing for Oregon: "I never seen a fan base take someone in and just treat them like family immediately... I just love the fans and the little kids because once upon a time I was one of those little kids just wishing to be in the shoes I am now... My family, they say every time, Oregon is one of the greatest they've ever been to for a game. It's such nice people. Just so grateful to be a part of it."

Tez Johnson on playing for Oregon: "I never seen a fan base take someone in and just treat them like family immediately... I just love the fans and the little kids because once upon a time I was one of those little kids just wishing to be in the shoes I am now... My family, they say every time, Oregon is one of the greatest they've ever been to for a game. It's such nice people. Just so grateful to be a part of it."

Brenna Greene

126,322 次观看 • 1 年前

Witkoff: "The president has this uncanny ability to bend people to his sensible way of thinking. He does it each and every time. I've never seen anything quite like it and I've been around some master dealmakers. He is the legend as far as I'm concerned."

Witkoff: "The president has this uncanny ability to bend people to his sensible way of thinking. He does it each and every time. I've never seen anything quite like it and I've been around some master dealmakers. He is the legend as far as I'm concerned."

Aaron Rupar

504,449 次观看 • 11 个月前

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,466 次观看 • 1 年前

"I really enjoyed [the sprint], particularly at the beginning and then obviously less so towards the end. But it's great to see Ferrari in the top three and to be a part of that. It was the first time that I've been in that battle this year with George and unfortunately my left tyre gave up quite early. But it's good, it was a good experience. Not too much lost ground wise and we'll see what changes we can make now so that it's better for tomorrow."

"I really enjoyed [the sprint], particularly at the beginning and then obviously less so towards the end. But it's great to see Ferrari in the top three and to be a part of that. It was the first time that I've been in that battle this year with George and unfortunately my left tyre gave up quite early. But it's good, it was a good experience. Not too much lost ground wise and we'll see what changes we can make now so that it's better for tomorrow."

sim

265,101 次观看 • 4 个月前

Arteta on if a weights been lifted: “I think so. I think it's a lot of emotion, joy, happiness, being proud and as well, it's a relief because when you see so much people and for so long just waiting for something to happen and actually you achieve it, it's like everything that we've done, it was worth it. “And now we need to sustain that energy, that positivity. And again, that presence that now we have as a team, as players in that moment to take the game to a different level and win it.”

Arteta on if a weights been lifted: “I think so. I think it's a lot of emotion, joy, happiness, being proud and as well, it's a relief because when you see so much people and for so long just waiting for something to happen and actually you achieve it, it's like everything that we've done, it was worth it. “And now we need to sustain that energy, that positivity. And again, that presence that now we have as a team, as players in that moment to take the game to a different level and win it.”

Connor Humm

34,536 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk: For Starship to work, we still need to solve a problem that has never been solved by anyone. “What's the single biggest remaining problem for Starship? It's having the heat shield be reusable. No one has ever made a reusable orbital heat shield. The heat shield's got to make it through the ascent phase without shocking a bunch of tiles. And then it's going to come back in and also not lose a bunch of tiles or overheat the main airframe. Isn't that hard because it's kind of fundamentally a consumable. It just needs to last a very long time. We have brought the ship back and had it do a soft landing in the ocean. I've done that a few times. But it lost a lot of tiles. It was not reusable without a lot of work. So even though it did come to a soft landing, it would not have been reusable without a lot of work. So it's not really reusable in that sense. That's the biggest problem that remains. So if you want to be able to land it, refill propellant, and fly again, you can't do this laborious inspection of 40,000 tiles type of thing.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

Elon Musk: For Starship to work, we still need to solve a problem that has never been solved by anyone. “What's the single biggest remaining problem for Starship? It's having the heat shield be reusable. No one has ever made a reusable orbital heat shield. The heat shield's got to make it through the ascent phase without shocking a bunch of tiles. And then it's going to come back in and also not lose a bunch of tiles or overheat the main airframe. Isn't that hard because it's kind of fundamentally a consumable. It just needs to last a very long time. We have brought the ship back and had it do a soft landing in the ocean. I've done that a few times. But it lost a lot of tiles. It was not reusable without a lot of work. So even though it did come to a soft landing, it would not have been reusable without a lot of work. So it's not really reusable in that sense. That's the biggest problem that remains. So if you want to be able to land it, refill propellant, and fly again, you can't do this laborious inspection of 40,000 tiles type of thing.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

ELON CLIPS

40,975 次观看 • 4 个月前

BROWDER: Most important thing is that Russians have been led to believe that "special military operation" in Ukraine was some far-off, distant thing that didn't affect average Russian. Now every Russian is affected by it. It's no longer "special military operation", it is a war. It's a war that's hitting them in pocketbook. It's a war that's making them stand in line for gas. It's a war where they can actually see plumes of black smoke on the horizon in St. Petersburg and Moscow. And that completely changes psychology of Russian people about how this war should be thought about and whether it's a war that they really want. Is it something that helps their lives? Is it something that makes them better off? And it was easy for them to think about it theoretically and say, "Okay, yeah, this is a great war of conquest." But it's no longer theoretical. It's very practical, and it affects their lives.

BROWDER: Most important thing is that Russians have been led to believe that "special military operation" in Ukraine was some far-off, distant thing that didn't affect average Russian. Now every Russian is affected by it. It's no longer "special military operation", it is a war. It's a war that's hitting them in pocketbook. It's a war that's making them stand in line for gas. It's a war where they can actually see plumes of black smoke on the horizon in St. Petersburg and Moscow. And that completely changes psychology of Russian people about how this war should be thought about and whether it's a war that they really want. Is it something that helps their lives? Is it something that makes them better off? And it was easy for them to think about it theoretically and say, "Okay, yeah, this is a great war of conquest." But it's no longer theoretical. It's very practical, and it affects their lives.

Kate from Kharkiv

25,095 次观看 • 1 天前

I've been doing a lot of thinking and i think this is a contender for best moment in the entire game AND HALF OF IT IS JUST CREDITS anyways ima rant about why i love it and also my PERSONAL interpretations in a thread :3c 🧵🧵🧵

I've been doing a lot of thinking and i think this is a contender for best moment in the entire game AND HALF OF IT IS JUST CREDITS anyways ima rant about why i love it and also my PERSONAL interpretations in a thread :3c 🧵🧵🧵

Ramb's #1 Famb (she/her)

42,014 次观看 • 23 天前

Asked Sen. Mark Kelly if he had confidence in Schumer. “I've been here four and a half years now, and he's been the leader, and I understand why people look at this and say, well, this was kind of a rough period. But it's Donald Trump who forced the government to be shut down.”

Asked Sen. Mark Kelly if he had confidence in Schumer. “I've been here four and a half years now, and he's been the leader, and I understand why people look at this and say, well, this was kind of a rough period. But it's Donald Trump who forced the government to be shut down.”

Manu Raju

169,621 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is from today's #WCWS game. This was ruled a base hit when it happened (you can see the 'H' pop up), but was changed to a missed catch error by the first baseman at the bottom of the fourth. This is an impossible catch for the first baseman with a ball thrown from that angle, that hard. This throw has to be to the glove, and while it's not a wild throw, it's low enough that the first baseman cannot get her glove around it in time. This is where replay gets you in trouble. The slo-mo replay makes it look like it's a catchable ball, but it isn't. In real time, at live speed, this isn't an error. This isn't a missed catch or a drop. I was loving the call of a single, especially because it was the first hit, and then, when it was changed, it felt like it was to protect a no-hitter. Everything about this screams "above ordinary effort" ... I would have left this as a single.

This is from today's #WCWS game. This was ruled a base hit when it happened (you can see the 'H' pop up), but was changed to a missed catch error by the first baseman at the bottom of the fourth. This is an impossible catch for the first baseman with a ball thrown from that angle, that hard. This throw has to be to the glove, and while it's not a wild throw, it's low enough that the first baseman cannot get her glove around it in time. This is where replay gets you in trouble. The slo-mo replay makes it look like it's a catchable ball, but it isn't. In real time, at live speed, this isn't an error. This isn't a missed catch or a drop. I was loving the call of a single, especially because it was the first hit, and then, when it was changed, it felt like it was to protect a no-hitter. Everything about this screams "above ordinary effort" ... I would have left this as a single.

MLB Scoring Changes

30,825 次观看 • 1 个月前

Spielberg, in the new and last Disclosure Day trailer: “I used to say to myself wouldn’t it be wonderful if all this turned out to be true? Now I’m thinking , wouldn’t it be wonderful for people to know all of this IS TRUE?” 🔥 Like I said, disclosure and then Disclosure. What a time to be alive…

Spielberg, in the new and last Disclosure Day trailer: “I used to say to myself wouldn’t it be wonderful if all this turned out to be true? Now I’m thinking , wouldn’t it be wonderful for people to know all of this IS TRUE?” 🔥 Like I said, disclosure and then Disclosure. What a time to be alive…

UAP Juan

188,390 次观看 • 2 个月前