正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I've never seen so many tech issues that went wrong than on January 29, 2022. Supposedly the Life360 data was "inaccurate" and doesn't work properly, suddenly Cellebrite and Google were both wildly unreliable and had a "glitch" that happened that's never been heard of, phones were butt dialing, butt... answering, butt hanging up and butt redialing as (2calls) Brian Albert "has relations with his wife" and (7 calls) Jen McCabe and (2 calls) Brian Higgins have no excuse for their "butt activity", somehow Trooper Paul couldn't count key cycles from the Lexus data, and cameras somehow inverted themselves while also deleting footage, while becoming completely unviewable at times, and showing "ghosts" in the middle of recording. And people still believe this is all just "coincidence"? All this tech anomaly, glitching, inverting, butt dials, etc. were somehow not part of a coverup? You're an absolute naive or in denial moron if you believe that shit. #FKR #McAlberts #NDAO #MSP #JenMcCabe #BrianAlbert #BrianHiggins #FreeTurtleboyshow more

That Girl T

3,176 subscribers

13,565 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Further revelations on Birmingham City Council candidate Shahid Butt. Shahid Butt was convicted in Yemen on terror charges in 1999 amid claims he was part of a terrorist enterprise targeting the country. He was reportedly found guilty of forming an armed gang and conspiring to bomb the British consulate, an Anglican church and a Swiss-owned hotel in Yemen. He was jailed for five years in Yemen, and before that had reportedly been jailed in Birmingham for violence. In previous media appearances, he claimed that “IDF babykillers” were “desecrating” and “dirtying” Birmingham, and that Muslims should not be friends with Jews. CAA’s online investigations have also found that Mr Butt appeared on the ‘Beyond the Surface’ podcast in November 2025 to discuss the Maccabi Tel Aviv fan ban and made the following comments: • “And this Zionist entity and all its supporters are the spawn of the devil. They are shaitans and they are satan worshippers…” • “… Judaism has been hijacked by Zionism, by these white supremacists.” • “Zionism is a white supremacist project. It always has been.” Then, in February 2026, TalkTV aired a pre-recorded interview with Mr Butt in which he was asked “Do you condemn Islamic extremism”. Mr Butt responds “... if you're talking about groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda, of course I condemn that”, but continues: “Hamas is a legitimate group that is fighting for the freedom of the Palestinians.” To the question “So they’re not a terrorist organisation?”, he responds: “No”, and continues: “October the seventh was a reflection of what was going on there.” It is astounding that people like this are in public life in this country.

Further revelations on Birmingham City Council candidate Shahid Butt. Shahid Butt was convicted in Yemen on terror charges in 1999 amid claims he was part of a terrorist enterprise targeting the country. He was reportedly found guilty of forming an armed gang and conspiring to bomb the British consulate, an Anglican church and a Swiss-owned hotel in Yemen. He was jailed for five years in Yemen, and before that had reportedly been jailed in Birmingham for violence. In previous media appearances, he claimed that “IDF babykillers” were “desecrating” and “dirtying” Birmingham, and that Muslims should not be friends with Jews. CAA’s online investigations have also found that Mr Butt appeared on the ‘Beyond the Surface’ podcast in November 2025 to discuss the Maccabi Tel Aviv fan ban and made the following comments: • “And this Zionist entity and all its supporters are the spawn of the devil. They are shaitans and they are satan worshippers…” • “… Judaism has been hijacked by Zionism, by these white supremacists.” • “Zionism is a white supremacist project. It always has been.” Then, in February 2026, TalkTV aired a pre-recorded interview with Mr Butt in which he was asked “Do you condemn Islamic extremism”. Mr Butt responds “... if you're talking about groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda, of course I condemn that”, but continues: “Hamas is a legitimate group that is fighting for the freedom of the Palestinians.” To the question “So they’re not a terrorist organisation?”, he responds: “No”, and continues: “October the seventh was a reflection of what was going on there.” It is astounding that people like this are in public life in this country.

Campaign Against Antisemitism

32,546 次观看 • 5 个月前

Swingers, and Google, and Voodoo...oh my! 😱 This is easiest one of the more funniest moments of the Rotten Mango podcast when Karen Read is asked about top online rumors surrounding certain Canton defendants. She tells a story about how it was actually John O'Keefe, while on their second date, that confirmed there is or was a swinging community within Canton. While she cannot confirm if Brian Albert or Jen McCabe partook, she did say she heard that swinging rumor directly from John. 😂 Also in regards to Google.. she's never researched anything online that was incriminating. 😉 And about the voodoo dolls of it all? Karen doesn't believe Jen has them but if she does she says "if she does they aren't working". Lolololol

Sensitive content

Swingers, and Google, and Voodoo...oh my! 😱 This is easiest one of the more funniest moments of the Rotten Mango podcast when Karen Read is asked about top online rumors surrounding certain Canton defendants. She tells a story about how it was actually John O'Keefe, while on their second date, that confirmed there is or was a swinging community within Canton. While she cannot confirm if Brian Albert or Jen McCabe partook, she did say she heard that swinging rumor directly from John. 😂 Also in regards to Google.. she's never researched anything online that was incriminating. 😉 And about the voodoo dolls of it all? Karen doesn't believe Jen has them but if she does she says "if she does they aren't working". Lolololol

BoozeyBeauty

47,921 次观看 • 7 个月前

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody

Dixie Normus

30,755 次观看 • 7 个月前

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 次观看 • 8 个月前

Djuna Perkins throwing shade and firing shots at Greg Connor and Adam Deitch…….. I mean, she’s not wrong 🥴 Jen McCabe lied to FBI agents in her own driveway about her own identity and then lied again to their faces about who she called in the 10 minutes she was getting ready, only to call them back and say “My husband told me I lied to you. I actually called 5 people. But I didn’t lie. I just forgot because I was thinking about brushing my teeth” or whatever bullshit she said. Lying about stopping at 34F for 5 minutes on the way to CPD Mike Lanks house. Michael Proctor lied in his FGJ testimony when he said he didn’t know or have close relationships with the Alberts…. When he’s actually good friends / gets drunk while working “overtime” with Kevin Albert. And his own mother calls Chris Albert’s family their “second family” Kerry Roberts lied in her FGJ testimony when she said she heard Karen ask Jen to “google hypothermia and how long… google hypothermia” Brian Albert, Jen McCabe and Brian Higgins all used the same phrase to lie about their phone calls - “butt dial” - that in itself is the definition of conspiracy. Brian Albert and Brian Higgins destroying evidence (their phones) 1 day before a preservation order… And to think the FBI / USAO has allegedly closed their investigation resulting in zero charges against these individuals is really hard to wrap my head around. Adam Deitch for District Attorney

Djuna Perkins throwing shade and firing shots at Greg Connor and Adam Deitch…….. I mean, she’s not wrong 🥴 Jen McCabe lied to FBI agents in her own driveway about her own identity and then lied again to their faces about who she called in the 10 minutes she was getting ready, only to call them back and say “My husband told me I lied to you. I actually called 5 people. But I didn’t lie. I just forgot because I was thinking about brushing my teeth” or whatever bullshit she said. Lying about stopping at 34F for 5 minutes on the way to CPD Mike Lanks house. Michael Proctor lied in his FGJ testimony when he said he didn’t know or have close relationships with the Alberts…. When he’s actually good friends / gets drunk while working “overtime” with Kevin Albert. And his own mother calls Chris Albert’s family their “second family” Kerry Roberts lied in her FGJ testimony when she said she heard Karen ask Jen to “google hypothermia and how long… google hypothermia” Brian Albert, Jen McCabe and Brian Higgins all used the same phrase to lie about their phone calls - “butt dial” - that in itself is the definition of conspiracy. Brian Albert and Brian Higgins destroying evidence (their phones) 1 day before a preservation order… And to think the FBI / USAO has allegedly closed their investigation resulting in zero charges against these individuals is really hard to wrap my head around. Adam Deitch for District Attorney

Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe)

11,312 次观看 • 2 个月前

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

The All-In Podcast

304,297 次观看 • 9 个月前

A boy touched this woman's daughter's butt at school . This happened to me and it ended quite differently. I sat in front of a black guy my senior year of high school, that would also touch my butt or pat it. I warned him 3 times . He kept doing it. I stood up ... and slapped him in the face as hard as I could. The other students were all like " WHOAA"... some of the kids across the room that didn't see what was going on said " WTF was THAT?" when they heard it. The teacher called me up to the front of the room and asked me why I slapped him . I told her. Surprisingly, he was suspended, but I wasn't. He ended up not coming back after his suspension. I can take alot . . BUT... I had enough that day.

A boy touched this woman's daughter's butt at school . This happened to me and it ended quite differently. I sat in front of a black guy my senior year of high school, that would also touch my butt or pat it. I warned him 3 times . He kept doing it. I stood up ... and slapped him in the face as hard as I could. The other students were all like " WHOAA"... some of the kids across the room that didn't see what was going on said " WTF was THAT?" when they heard it. The teacher called me up to the front of the room and asked me why I slapped him . I told her. Surprisingly, he was suspended, but I wasn't. He ended up not coming back after his suspension. I can take alot . . BUT... I had enough that day.

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

253,716 次观看 • 2 个月前

I had Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 on the show yesterday. It was great. He said something interesting about Brian Cole Jr. when I asked if he believed Brian was the pipe bomber. He says he believes Brian planted the bombs, but strongly implied others were involved. I personally believe Brian is a patsy, and that if he was involved at all, it was most likely as a pawn for deep state entities (Capitol Police, FBI, etc. The FBI in particular has a history of exploiting mentally vulnerable people for plots). And the problem is precisely that if Brian Cole Jr. was working with others in some capacity, none of those players have been held accountable over five years later, he still is a patsy, and it is unconscionable that he is still in pretrial detention. And the very same corrupt players at the DOJ who were the reason for Trump having to issue pardons for Jan. 6’ers are still involved in the persecution of this patsy.

I had Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸 on the show yesterday. It was great. He said something interesting about Brian Cole Jr. when I asked if he believed Brian was the pipe bomber. He says he believes Brian planted the bombs, but strongly implied others were involved. I personally believe Brian is a patsy, and that if he was involved at all, it was most likely as a pawn for deep state entities (Capitol Police, FBI, etc. The FBI in particular has a history of exploiting mentally vulnerable people for plots). And the problem is precisely that if Brian Cole Jr. was working with others in some capacity, none of those players have been held accountable over five years later, he still is a patsy, and it is unconscionable that he is still in pretrial detention. And the very same corrupt players at the DOJ who were the reason for Trump having to issue pardons for Jan. 6’ers are still involved in the persecution of this patsy.

Viva Frei

42,857 次观看 • 1 个月前

idk why you’d be on mjtwt saying ANY of his discography is “shit in the butt” (since he gets ridiculed for so many things daily) but you clearly haven’t been educated on the fact that michael recording ‘come together’ was much MORE than a simple cover. this was a BLACK ARTIST reclaiming a song that PLAGIARISED the shit out of chuck berry AND it marks the time were he bought their entire catalog as a big fuck you to the elites and better yet, later a huge fuck you to sony. so there will be no slander around here. thank you.

idk why you’d be on mjtwt saying ANY of his discography is “shit in the butt” (since he gets ridiculed for so many things daily) but you clearly haven’t been educated on the fact that michael recording ‘come together’ was much MORE than a simple cover. this was a BLACK ARTIST reclaiming a song that PLAGIARISED the shit out of chuck berry AND it marks the time were he bought their entire catalog as a big fuck you to the elites and better yet, later a huge fuck you to sony. so there will be no slander around here. thank you.

yasmin ࣪ ִֶָ☾.

14,330 次观看 • 1 个月前

If you believe that Brian Albert and Brian Higgins would murder or help cover up the murder of a fellow brother in blue, you’re either a grifter or delusional and not thinking rationally. But let’s entertain the absurd notion that they did-let’s pretend they are evil killers. If that were the case, John would still be missing and never seen again. These are not ordinary, everyday men, as should be plainly evident. Do you honestly think they would leave a body on their front lawn and casually go to bed? 💥 Brian Higgins is currently an ATF Agent. He was previously a lieutenant on The Cambridge fire department and an EMT. He was a Combat medic in the Army. He worked on fellow infantry men in his unit. He served in both the Iraq and Afghanistan war. In 2010, while on surveillance, his partner was shot by a suspect. Higgins render aid and was credited with keeping his partner alive long enough so he could receive life saving care. In 2011 he was awarded the Trooper George L. Hanna award, the highest honor a Massachusetts law enforcement officer can receive, for bravery In the field. In 2013 he was awarded the Law Enforcement Congressional badge of bravery. 💥 Brian Albert is a 30-year retired veteran of the Boston Police Department. He is a U.S. Marine and a combat veteran of the gulf War. As the commander of the BPD fugitive unit, he has arrested literally hundreds of violent murderers and felons. He is a two-time recipient of the Trooper George L. Hanna Award, One of the Hanna awards is for Valor in the Face of an armed assault. Additionally, he has earned multiple Boston Police Department Medals of Honor. During his stellar career, he tracked down and apprehended the Craigslist Killer. He also tracked down and helped captured Victor Peña, a kidnapper and rapist. Furthermore, he arrested and extradited Clark Rockefeller, he supervised the investigation that lead to the recovery of the discarded water bottle that confirmed a 99.9% DNA match to Albert DeSalvo, the Boston Strangler suspect. Again, if you believe the nonsensical conspiracy theory that Karen Read, her defense team, and her PR-driven Twitter and YouTube supporters have been promoting for the past two years, you’re either delusional and not thinking rationally or simply a conspiracy theorist. There is no middle ground. #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

If you believe that Brian Albert and Brian Higgins would murder or help cover up the murder of a fellow brother in blue, you’re either a grifter or delusional and not thinking rationally. But let’s entertain the absurd notion that they did-let’s pretend they are evil killers. If that were the case, John would still be missing and never seen again. These are not ordinary, everyday men, as should be plainly evident. Do you honestly think they would leave a body on their front lawn and casually go to bed? 💥 Brian Higgins is currently an ATF Agent. He was previously a lieutenant on The Cambridge fire department and an EMT. He was a Combat medic in the Army. He worked on fellow infantry men in his unit. He served in both the Iraq and Afghanistan war. In 2010, while on surveillance, his partner was shot by a suspect. Higgins render aid and was credited with keeping his partner alive long enough so he could receive life saving care. In 2011 he was awarded the Trooper George L. Hanna award, the highest honor a Massachusetts law enforcement officer can receive, for bravery In the field. In 2013 he was awarded the Law Enforcement Congressional badge of bravery. 💥 Brian Albert is a 30-year retired veteran of the Boston Police Department. He is a U.S. Marine and a combat veteran of the gulf War. As the commander of the BPD fugitive unit, he has arrested literally hundreds of violent murderers and felons. He is a two-time recipient of the Trooper George L. Hanna Award, One of the Hanna awards is for Valor in the Face of an armed assault. Additionally, he has earned multiple Boston Police Department Medals of Honor. During his stellar career, he tracked down and apprehended the Craigslist Killer. He also tracked down and helped captured Victor Peña, a kidnapper and rapist. Furthermore, he arrested and extradited Clark Rockefeller, he supervised the investigation that lead to the recovery of the discarded water bottle that confirmed a 99.9% DNA match to Albert DeSalvo, the Boston Strangler suspect. Again, if you believe the nonsensical conspiracy theory that Karen Read, her defense team, and her PR-driven Twitter and YouTube supporters have been promoting for the past two years, you’re either delusional and not thinking rationally or simply a conspiracy theorist. There is no middle ground. #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Mama Llama

73,939 次观看 • 1 年前

Peter from Lawyer You Know points out interesting language from each of The House Defendant’s MTD reply… The McAlberts and Higgins all state they were at the Waterfall Bar socializing with “friends and family” They all state that John O’Keefe and Karen Read just “showed up” towards the end of the night and started socializing with “their friends and family” Seems like they are forgetting that one of their family members INVITED John O’Keefe to the Waterfall- 👇🏼 CHRIS ALBERT texted John O’Keefe at 9:45pm saying: “Get over here. If not I’ll fuck up your lawn” Equally as interesting… Didn’t Jen McCabe say her and John O’Keefe were very close friends and that she “loved him” while testifying in both criminal trials? Now she’s trying to distance herself- as if Karen Read and John O’Keefe were just random strangers who showed up at the bar and inserted themselves into their night. ~3 hours after that text from Chris to John, John is never heard from again, after being invited to and dropped off at Chris’s brothers house. How ironic… #KarenRead #JohnOkeefe Damon M. Seligson Esq.

Peter from Lawyer You Know points out interesting language from each of The House Defendant’s MTD reply… The McAlberts and Higgins all state they were at the Waterfall Bar socializing with “friends and family” They all state that John O’Keefe and Karen Read just “showed up” towards the end of the night and started socializing with “their friends and family” Seems like they are forgetting that one of their family members INVITED John O’Keefe to the Waterfall- 👇🏼 CHRIS ALBERT texted John O’Keefe at 9:45pm saying: “Get over here. If not I’ll fuck up your lawn” Equally as interesting… Didn’t Jen McCabe say her and John O’Keefe were very close friends and that she “loved him” while testifying in both criminal trials? Now she’s trying to distance herself- as if Karen Read and John O’Keefe were just random strangers who showed up at the bar and inserted themselves into their night. ~3 hours after that text from Chris to John, John is never heard from again, after being invited to and dropped off at Chris’s brothers house. How ironic… #KarenRead #JohnOkeefe Damon M. Seligson Esq.

Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe)

22,344 次观看 • 4 个月前

Me: I try to look at data and trends rather than headlines, because headlines can give you a misleading picture of the state of the world. Something goes wrong every day — that’s guaranteed — and if you just look at something goes wrong and say, oh, things are getting worse, you might be forgetting all the things that went wrong in the past. Andrew Marr: And what we call the news is a long litany of all the things that are getting worse or going wrong. Me: Well, yes, it’s much easier for something bad to happen suddenly than for something good to happen. Good things either creep up on you a few percentage points a year, and sometimes can compound. So the fact that, for example, extreme poverty in the world has been declining and a billion people have escaped extreme poverty over the last 30 years — but not on Thursday — so it was never an event from the news. One of the biggest events in human history is something that most people have never even heard of. Andrew Marr LBC

Me: I try to look at data and trends rather than headlines, because headlines can give you a misleading picture of the state of the world. Something goes wrong every day — that’s guaranteed — and if you just look at something goes wrong and say, oh, things are getting worse, you might be forgetting all the things that went wrong in the past. Andrew Marr: And what we call the news is a long litany of all the things that are getting worse or going wrong. Me: Well, yes, it’s much easier for something bad to happen suddenly than for something good to happen. Good things either creep up on you a few percentage points a year, and sometimes can compound. So the fact that, for example, extreme poverty in the world has been declining and a billion people have escaped extreme poverty over the last 30 years — but not on Thursday — so it was never an event from the news. One of the biggest events in human history is something that most people have never even heard of. Andrew Marr LBC

Steven Pinker

100,941 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jen McCabe: “I knew John never came in the house so I had no concern for anyone’s safety inside the house.” “I was not worried at all because something happened on the front lawn that had nothing to do with anything inside that house.” Jen McCabe would literally have no way of knowing at that point what happened to John O’Keefe, or that “something happened on the front lawn that had nothing to do with anything inside that house.” In fact, Jen McCabe claims that all three of her phone calls to her sister, Nicole Albert, that morning went unanswered despite phone records showing them as answered. Wouldn’t this fact alone make her incredibly concerned for her sister’s safety, especially after finding John O’Keefe dead on her front lawn? ———— Attorney Alan Jackson seems to sum up Jen McCabe’s behavior pretty well: “You weren’t worried about [Nicole and Brian Albert] at all, because you knew what really happened, didn’t you Mrs. McCabe?” #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Jen McCabe: “I knew John never came in the house so I had no concern for anyone’s safety inside the house.” “I was not worried at all because something happened on the front lawn that had nothing to do with anything inside that house.” Jen McCabe would literally have no way of knowing at that point what happened to John O’Keefe, or that “something happened on the front lawn that had nothing to do with anything inside that house.” In fact, Jen McCabe claims that all three of her phone calls to her sister, Nicole Albert, that morning went unanswered despite phone records showing them as answered. Wouldn’t this fact alone make her incredibly concerned for her sister’s safety, especially after finding John O’Keefe dead on her front lawn? ———— Attorney Alan Jackson seems to sum up Jen McCabe’s behavior pretty well: “You weren’t worried about [Nicole and Brian Albert] at all, because you knew what really happened, didn’t you Mrs. McCabe?” #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

151,204 次观看 • 1 年前

Must listen. Tucker just went off on the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up and his connection to Israel on Turning Point. Absolute fire. No one is allowed to say the foreign government Epstein was connected to was Israel because we have been cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that... "And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working? How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island and the largest residential…house in Manhattan? Where did all the money come from? And, no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been… somehow cowed… into…thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never…prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here, my family's been here for hundreds of years. I love this country, that's why I live here. So, criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater, it makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that…because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. That that's like too naughty and forbidden. And, the effect… of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online. Where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house… You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So, I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course that question has been asked to the government of Israel and their answer is, we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be, no no As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not?"

Must listen. Tucker just went off on the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up and his connection to Israel on Turning Point. Absolute fire. No one is allowed to say the foreign government Epstein was connected to was Israel because we have been cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that... "And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working? How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island and the largest residential…house in Manhattan? Where did all the money come from? And, no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been… somehow cowed… into…thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never…prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here, my family's been here for hundreds of years. I love this country, that's why I live here. So, criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater, it makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that…because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. That that's like too naughty and forbidden. And, the effect… of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online. Where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house… You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So, I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course that question has been asked to the government of Israel and their answer is, we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be, no no As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not?"

Green Lives Matter

1,251,223 次观看 • 1 年前

"The point of Brian Tully leaking Lindsey Gaetani's phone was to create a media frenzy and change the narrative. To get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the Karen Read + TurtleBoy cases. Specifically, friends of Tully's MSP unit like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter." "By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment (April 2024, the start of the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial) and create one heck of a diversion." "You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?" TRANSCRIPT: Alright, let's talk about the Karen Read case. There's this wild story that's been bubbling up and it's not even about the trial itself, it's about the evidence. We're going to dive into a massive data leak that raises some pretty serious questions about how law enforcement is operating here. I mean, just think about this for a second. How on earth does a decade and a half of someone's private phone data—we're talking texts, photos, contacts, everything—end up out in the open, and get this: released by the very people who are supposed to be protecting it? So this all blew up in April of 2024. The complete, totally unredacted phone data of a key person in this whole affair, Lindsey Gaetani, was just leaked. And I'm not just talking about a couple of messages; we're talking about her entire digital life laid bare for everyone to see. 15 years—just let that sink in. Imagine everything on your phone going all the way back to the mid-2000s, just suddenly becoming public information. It's a huge breach of privacy, and it makes you ask one thing right away: How could this possibly happen? Okay, so to figure out how this went down, we really have to look at the people involved. And trust me, it is a complicated web of state troopers, private investigators, and even online operatives, all connected in some really crucial ways. Let's try to untangle this a bit. You've got state police officer Brian Tully, he's the one who allegedly leaked the data, and there's Kate Peter, a private investigator. And what's really weird is that her messages with Gaetani were mysteriously scrubbed from the data before it got out. Trooper Nick Guarino is the one who processed the data. And all of this, this whole handover, happened while the special prosecutor, Ken Mello, was literally in the hospital. The theory is that this was all meant to protect people like Jen McCabe, who's a key witness in the main case. So how did this happen? Well, one story being floated is that it was just a series of clumsy accidents, a real comedy of errors that, whoops, resulted in a massive data breach. As you can probably guess, not a lot of people are buying that one. So the accident theory—and you gotta' hear this—goes something like this. An officer tripped? Okay, and while he was stumbling, he just happened to perfectly edit a cell phone extraction, removing very specific messages. Then, apparently he morphed into a snowball, rolled down the highway, and tumbled right into the defense lawyer's office, delivering the data. You know, a total accident. Yeah, as one source put it, it's just ludicrous. You don't trip and fall and end up in that situation. It makes no sense. So if it wasn't some bizarre accident, what was it? Well, there's a much more compelling argument out there, that this leak was no accident. It was a deliberate, calculated move. And there's actually evidence that points right in that direction. Just consider these points for a minute. A clumsy trip doesn't explain why specific messages from Trooper Tully himself and from PI Kate Peter were surgically removed from the data. It also doesn't explain the timing. Why would Tully hand deliver this package, personally, while the one guy who could provide any oversight, Prosecutor Ken Mello, was out of commission in the hospital? And this isn't just speculation. This is special prosecutor Ken Mello testifying in court. He confirms it. He says that while he was hospitalized, his colleague, Tully, delivered the evidence package. This tells us that someone took it upon themselves to act, while their superior was unavailable. So let's just lay it all out, side by side. In one corner you have the accident theory, which, you know, involves snowballs and doesn't explain any of the key facts, like the edited data. And in the other corner you have the intentional leak theory. This one actually explains the missing messages and is backed up by court testimony and some seriously suspicious timing. So that brings us to the biggest question of all, right? If this was a deliberate act by a member of law enforcement, what was the motive? Why on earth would an officer intentionally leak 15 years of someone's private life? Well, according to the sources we're looking at, the answer is just one word: Distraction. The whole point of this massive data dump was to create a media frenzy, a public circus, and completely change the conversation. And what was the goal of this distraction? It was allegedly to get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the case. Specifically, people who were friends of the police unit, like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter. By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment and create one heck of a diversion. You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?

"The point of Brian Tully leaking Lindsey Gaetani's phone was to create a media frenzy and change the narrative. To get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the Karen Read + TurtleBoy cases. Specifically, friends of Tully's MSP unit like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter." "By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment (April 2024, the start of the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial) and create one heck of a diversion." "You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?" TRANSCRIPT: Alright, let's talk about the Karen Read case. There's this wild story that's been bubbling up and it's not even about the trial itself, it's about the evidence. We're going to dive into a massive data leak that raises some pretty serious questions about how law enforcement is operating here. I mean, just think about this for a second. How on earth does a decade and a half of someone's private phone data—we're talking texts, photos, contacts, everything—end up out in the open, and get this: released by the very people who are supposed to be protecting it? So this all blew up in April of 2024. The complete, totally unredacted phone data of a key person in this whole affair, Lindsey Gaetani, was just leaked. And I'm not just talking about a couple of messages; we're talking about her entire digital life laid bare for everyone to see. 15 years—just let that sink in. Imagine everything on your phone going all the way back to the mid-2000s, just suddenly becoming public information. It's a huge breach of privacy, and it makes you ask one thing right away: How could this possibly happen? Okay, so to figure out how this went down, we really have to look at the people involved. And trust me, it is a complicated web of state troopers, private investigators, and even online operatives, all connected in some really crucial ways. Let's try to untangle this a bit. You've got state police officer Brian Tully, he's the one who allegedly leaked the data, and there's Kate Peter, a private investigator. And what's really weird is that her messages with Gaetani were mysteriously scrubbed from the data before it got out. Trooper Nick Guarino is the one who processed the data. And all of this, this whole handover, happened while the special prosecutor, Ken Mello, was literally in the hospital. The theory is that this was all meant to protect people like Jen McCabe, who's a key witness in the main case. So how did this happen? Well, one story being floated is that it was just a series of clumsy accidents, a real comedy of errors that, whoops, resulted in a massive data breach. As you can probably guess, not a lot of people are buying that one. So the accident theory—and you gotta' hear this—goes something like this. An officer tripped? Okay, and while he was stumbling, he just happened to perfectly edit a cell phone extraction, removing very specific messages. Then, apparently he morphed into a snowball, rolled down the highway, and tumbled right into the defense lawyer's office, delivering the data. You know, a total accident. Yeah, as one source put it, it's just ludicrous. You don't trip and fall and end up in that situation. It makes no sense. So if it wasn't some bizarre accident, what was it? Well, there's a much more compelling argument out there, that this leak was no accident. It was a deliberate, calculated move. And there's actually evidence that points right in that direction. Just consider these points for a minute. A clumsy trip doesn't explain why specific messages from Trooper Tully himself and from PI Kate Peter were surgically removed from the data. It also doesn't explain the timing. Why would Tully hand deliver this package, personally, while the one guy who could provide any oversight, Prosecutor Ken Mello, was out of commission in the hospital? And this isn't just speculation. This is special prosecutor Ken Mello testifying in court. He confirms it. He says that while he was hospitalized, his colleague, Tully, delivered the evidence package. This tells us that someone took it upon themselves to act, while their superior was unavailable. So let's just lay it all out, side by side. In one corner you have the accident theory, which, you know, involves snowballs and doesn't explain any of the key facts, like the edited data. And in the other corner you have the intentional leak theory. This one actually explains the missing messages and is backed up by court testimony and some seriously suspicious timing. So that brings us to the biggest question of all, right? If this was a deliberate act by a member of law enforcement, what was the motive? Why on earth would an officer intentionally leak 15 years of someone's private life? Well, according to the sources we're looking at, the answer is just one word: Distraction. The whole point of this massive data dump was to create a media frenzy, a public circus, and completely change the conversation. And what was the goal of this distraction? It was allegedly to get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the case. Specifically, people who were friends of the police unit, like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter. By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment and create one heck of a diversion. You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?

Grant Smith Ellis

12,028 次观看 • 9 个月前

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”

Curtis Houck

11,692 次观看 • 1 年前