Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 Japan makes history! 🇯🇵 For the first time ever, a ship-mounted electromagnetic railgun has been successfully fired at sea. 🔹Next-level naval firepower 🔹Faster, longer-range, and more precise than traditional cannons 🔹Signals a major leap in maritime defense technology The era of railgun-powered warships is officially here. 🌊⚡

279,281 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

33 Kommentare

Profilbild von 🛡️toshihiko. ito🌞
🛡️toshihiko. ito🌞vor 1 Jahr

Japan builds to perform. China builds to impress. One side refines technology, the other rehearses power.

Profilbild von Bill Stout
Bill Stoutvor 1 Jahr

US Navy gave up due to a number of issues - great to see a key ally solve those issues

Profilbild von Mirn
Mirnvor 1 Jahr

Railguns and other plasma guns are a dead-end weapon. Here's why: 1. The combustion energy of any fuel, even something as inefficient as gunpowder, is many orders of magnitude higher—thousands of times—than the capacitance of supercapacitors. For hundreds of dollars, you can simply outperform a railgun with... classic barrel artillery. This was the main reason why railguns were discontinued, not barrel wear. 2. But the artillery principle itself is extremely inefficient. Why do we need maximum velocity at the muzzle exit? No one needs it because we suffer monstrous losses of kinetic energy due to air friction, and the losses are maximum because maximum velocity is at the very bottom of the ballistic traectory. Conversely, maximum velocity is needed at the top of the parabola—and that's what missiles are for. Compare the "Schwerer Gustav" and "Tochka U" in size, weight, and pre-fire preparation speed (hundreds of times the weight, and the pre-fire preparation time is an hour versus four weeks). But the missile has greater range and accuracy with the same warhead weight. 3. The enemy has changed – you won't get a battleship as enemy, but a swarm of tiny, ultra-cheap drones. Big guns aren't necessary; you need smart "shotguns." Just ask the Russian Black Sea Fleet (which is at the bottom for precisely this reason lol). 4. The railgun is monstrously expensive.

Profilbild von 𝔽ℝ🛡𝔻𝔼𝔽
𝔽ℝ🛡𝔻𝔼𝔽vor 1 Jahr

Est-ce lié au programme RAFIRA ? 🇫🇷🇩🇪🇯🇵

Profilbild von SiameseSingle
SiameseSinglevor 1 Jahr

Definitely not the first time. USA had single use railguns on at least one ship until the materials for launcher were fixed and got 10 rounds a minute. Then we retrofit a carrier to launch planes with same tech. Japan is 30 yrs behind.

Profilbild von Jože Rekar 🇷🇺
Jože Rekar 🇷🇺vor 1 Jahr

The first electromagnetic railgun was fired in 1980 by the US Naval Research Laboratory. Technology only half a century old is a big breakthrough for japanese 😂

Profilbild von .
.vor 1 Jahr

I wonder if it would be practical to scale it down to make an EM truck mounted artillery.

Profilbild von Henrik Gerhard Heuser
Henrik Gerhard Heuservor 1 Jahr

If I don't remember it wrong, it's the 3rd or 4th time Japan has been firing that gun at sea. Thus it's not he first time

Profilbild von Rybar Pacific
Rybar Pacificvor 1 Jahr

A major milestone, no doubt — but let’s see how it performs outside of controlled tests. Power demands, heat management, and reload logistics are still massive hurdles.

Profilbild von SpannerMonkey
SpannerMonkeyvor 1 Jahr

How did they solve rail wear?

Profilbild von midorioshii
midorioshiivor 1 Jahr

Hopefully it's aimed eastward.

Profilbild von Stefano
Stefanovor 1 Jahr

The US Navy gave up on the railgun, maybe Japan will sell us one.

Profilbild von Funky
Funkyvor 1 Jahr

chinese drone for 90 bucks sinks the ship, what now?

Profilbild von fassenkugel
fassenkugelvor 1 Jahr

german had this in ww2... and still have a same problems...

Profilbild von Florida Bartley 🇺🇸💥
Florida Bartley 🇺🇸💥vor 1 Jahr

Idiots in US failed and just built their mansions with our cash.

Profilbild von Thefiligreehamster
Thefiligreehamstervor 1 Jahr

Not unless they've solved the problem of the barrel becoming unserviceable after a dozen firings.

Profilbild von No-Sheep
No-Sheepvor 1 Jahr

HOW can this work.. if the eath is a BALL with curvature?? Dumbasses everywhere...

Profilbild von QiFengYin🥃Live Long And Prosper🖖
QiFengYin🥃Live Long And Prosper🖖vor 1 Jahr

1, 5MJ toy, a working railgun needs at least 20MJ to destroy a naval target 2, 1.5shot/min, 320g 40mm shell, barely able to damage a small fishing boat 3, need 2 standard shipping crates of batteries 4, Even the Japanese think this is a money laundering scam

Profilbild von 法国人
法国人vor 1 Jahr

The boat name is Asuka 💀. it’s the period where the Japan discovered the Chinese Buddhism, the Chinese kanji’s and the Chinese architecture . Where they tried to copy the Chinese Tang dynasty

Profilbild von Nino
Ninovor 1 Jahr

meanwhile in China

Profilbild von Master
Mastervor 1 Jahr

Not true! The first time ever was when China fired an electromagnetic gun from a ship more than 8 years ago. Educate yourself.

Profilbild von Nustadax
Nustadaxvor 1 Jahr

99% Sure the USA navy did this decades ago

Profilbild von Nicky Boy
Nicky Boyvor 1 Jahr

Just proves the earth is flat

Profilbild von Kenneth Lees
Kenneth Leesvor 1 Jahr

Yikes! Up to 7 times the speed of sound?!? That's Mach 9.

Profilbild von Emil
Emilvor 1 Jahr

Excellent 👏🏻

Profilbild von Defense Innovation Review
Defense Innovation Reviewvor 1 Jahr

Is it the same success as a month ago?

Profilbild von #ابو_احمد_🇾🇪
#ابو_احمد_🇾🇪vor 1 Jahr

Does it make a sound when it is launched?

Profilbild von Denis
Denisvor 1 Jahr

@grok 研究該技術及其應用實例,誰在領導和測試該技術,每次射擊的成本,​​威力

Profilbild von Lussac
Lussacvor 1 Jahr

いいじゃん

Profilbild von SKYMOON
SKYMOONvor 1 Jahr

@kaan_fox3 Bizim bir proje vardı ne oldu o ? Bilgimiz varmı son haber vs ?

Profilbild von MI
MIvor 1 Jahr

🦖

Profilbild von Hugo Moreira 🇪🇺
Hugo Moreira 🇪🇺vor 1 Jahr

Hey Chinese @junshiguancha this is already operational how much time until yours is?

Profilbild von Biturownboss
Biturownbossvor 1 Jahr

@grok verify

Ähnliche Videos