Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Jim Chanos called Enron before it collapsed - by reading the one page everyone skipped. now he says the same trick is hiding in plain sight again. the trick: in a spending boom, one dollar gets counted twice. booked as profit by the company selling the gear - quietly... depreciated by the one buying it. earnings look unstoppable… until the spending stops. his receipt: S&P 500 earnings rose ~30% into 2000, then cratered ~40% in twelve months. no recession did that. the telecom buildout just froze - firms had ordered 10,000 routers and needed 2,000. he says the AI infrastructure boom runs on identical mechanics. ~20-min interview, free. the man who saw Enron in the footnotes on how every boom hides its own bust ↓show more

0xDipper

6,795 subscribers

435,394 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von #silentlystacking

#silentlystackingvor 3 Monaten

Jim Chanos was wrong many times. He bet against Tesla and lost a shit ton of money. I believe he closed up shop because his investors wanted out of the fund. He’s a very smart dude though.

Profilbild von Equalizer

Equalizervor 3 Monaten

Are we still talking about the depreciation schedules on GPUs? Has anyone told him the 100s from 2020 are still churning out big inference dollars?

Profilbild von 華爾街分析猿

華爾街分析猿vor 3 Monaten

Have you checked his performance since financial crisis?

Profilbild von 𝐁𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐏𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞

𝐁𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐏𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞vor 3 Monaten

He's been short Tesla since almost the inception. I'm not saying he's wrong on spending, but one great call doesn't make him right on everything. Caution is advised.

Profilbild von Sgt.Hummus

Sgt.Hummusvor 3 Monaten

Stop following these mentally-ill perma-bear doomers. They don’t make money. They just book interviews.

Profilbild von StormFX

StormFXvor 3 Monaten

The way he breaks down that double-counting is pretty wild. It makes you wonder how many other booms have had similar hidden flaws that only become obvious in hindsight.

Profilbild von Smellmyfinger

Smellmyfingervor 3 Monaten

He still short Tesla ? 🤣

Profilbild von Clarence Beeks, Crop Report Specialist

Clarence Beeks, Crop Report Specialistvor 3 Monaten

Not unlike how they account for gold leases, swaps, etc. The gold is counted twice, on the books of both entities as an asset.

Profilbild von Douglas Ritz

Douglas Ritzvor 3 Monaten

OpenAi has delayed its IPO until next year because the investor confidence is not there. They same will be for Anthropic. 60% of American companies are now using Chinese open source models. Once again:

Profilbild von Saman Ahmed

Saman Ahmedvor 3 Monaten

I’ve noticed these comparisons often lean heavily on historical analogies that don’t map cleanly onto current demand cycles. My take is the accounting concern is worth understanding, but it doesn’t automatically imply the same outcome imo.

Profilbild von Urban Cruise

Urban Cruisevor 3 Monaten

thanks for the ai slop post, very informative

Profilbild von Jeffrey (BullBearJeff)

Jeffrey (BullBearJeff)vor 3 Monaten

@DexAust

Profilbild von Demetrios Pahno

Demetrios Pahnovor 3 Monaten

Chanos mistakenly calls SPCX a neocloud—a commodity business. Tesla is no neocloud. Launching a 300MW SOTA coherent compute cluster in 120 days is astounding. Temporary rentals to Anthropic & Google will yield a massive ROI. Chanos repeating old mistake -treating Tesla as just another auto company.

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide

AI Mastery Guidevor 3 Monaten

One dollar counted twice as profit and depreciation at the same time is a wild pattern to spot repeating.

Profilbild von Nutbutter

Nutbuttervor 3 Monaten

the networkers were stuffing their channel with boxes which were then moved to offsite warehouses.

Profilbild von dscrockett

dscrockettvor 3 Monaten

No economist, but Chanos' theory is true of every product sold.

Profilbild von XYZ

XYZvor 3 Monaten

He first said hyperscalers were cooking the books with their extremely long depreciation schedules and now he has quietly walked it back. He now says 5 years old hardware could possibly be used for 8-10 years. The dude is a clown… doesn’t own up to the bs he spawns…

Profilbild von Stare Decisis

Stare Decisisvor 3 Monaten

Jim called it. And here again.

Profilbild von OnchainMaxi

OnchainMaxivor 3 Monaten

Demand was non existent in 2000. Today the GPUs are literally burning in the server racks!

Profilbild von Lee Bollard

Lee Bollardvor 3 Monaten

Fiber companies in 2000 were laying dark cable and therefore didn’t have the revenue to service their debt. The largest most profitable companies EVER have the means to pay these days. Almost no semi built today for AI is going unused. See the difference?

Profilbild von Moysha

Moyshavor 3 Monaten

booked

Profilbild von Fede Sandler

Fede Sandlervor 3 Monaten

Unbelievable I’m a total nobody and I picked up the same thing. Wow

Profilbild von Blauvelt Capital

Blauvelt Capitalvor 3 Monaten

Chanos has spent the last 20 years being on the wrong side of everything

Profilbild von nofad

nofadvor 3 Monaten

Videos like these deliver alpha—always have, always will.

Profilbild von Daniel

Danielvor 3 Monaten

When is this freakkin Ackman gonna buy UBER?

Profilbild von DSinden

DSindenvor 3 Monaten

Isn't that double counting what economists call the multiplier?

Profilbild von JC

JCvor 3 Monaten

Chanos was short Tesla as early as 2016 and has called for it's collapse in price many times since. How did that work out?

Profilbild von Jade

Jadevor 3 Monaten

@DA_Stockman That one dollar gets passed around like a pack of Marlborough Cigarettes in the Soviet Union.

Profilbild von CryptoTaxCounsel JD LLM

CryptoTaxCounsel JD LLMvor 3 Monaten

As an accountant and a tax attorney I am at a loss for words by this statement. Simply idiotic. "...in a spending boom, one dollar gets counted twice. booked as profit by the company selling the gear - quietly depreciated by the one buying it..."

Profilbild von Stark Seven

Stark Sevenvor 3 Monaten

In the telecom buildout they forgot to install the cables actually going to people’s houses. Earnings fell because demand took much longer than expected to materialise, don’t think that applies to AI today, everyone has access already so as long as AI is useful, demand will grow

Profilbild von Adam Potulski

Adam Potulskivor 3 Monaten

How has that worked out for him since?

Profilbild von Dean Kolner

Dean Kolnervor 3 Monaten

Pick your pundit. I respect Chanos. I wish I had a buck for every analyst who called a BIG correction or Crash. At some point somebody will be right.

Profilbild von TimeTraveler0x1

TimeTraveler0x1vor 3 Monaten

Shortsellers are rarely v rarely right though. The market is built to be up only over a bigger timeframe

Profilbild von Ninedol

Ninedolvor 3 Monaten

only 13 minutes, now I know what I'm going to do right now

Profilbild von J L

J Lvor 3 Monaten

One dollar gets counted many times more than twice, because each derivative loan layer does the same thing. So it becomes a multilayered house of cards where the books show exponentially more than the actual origination.

Ähnliche Videos

S&P 500 earnings: +30% in 2 years (1998-2000). Then -40% in 12 months in a mild recession. That swing was not from the recession. It was from the telecom build-out collapsing. Companies realized they ordered 10,000 routers and needed 2,000. They pulled order books. Vendor revenues evaporated overnight. Depreciation costs kept running for years. Jim Chanos on iConnections: the AI CapEx boom has identical mechanics. Nvidia's earnings are CapEx boom output. S&P estimates are rising fast because infrastructure spending flows directly into a small number of vendors. If AI infrastructure spending slows - and order books get pulled - the earnings collapse is fast and severe regardless of how mild any recession is. The full dot-com analog and what it means for $NVDA positioning today: Source: iConnections -

S&P 500 earnings: +30% in 2 years (1998-2000). Then -40% in 12 months in a mild recession. That swing was not from the recession. It was from the telecom build-out collapsing. Companies realized they ordered 10,000 routers and needed 2,000. They pulled order books. Vendor revenues evaporated overnight. Depreciation costs kept running for years. Jim Chanos on iConnections: the AI CapEx boom has identical mechanics. Nvidia's earnings are CapEx boom output. S&P estimates are rising fast because infrastructure spending flows directly into a small number of vendors. If AI infrastructure spending slows - and order books get pulled - the earnings collapse is fast and severe regardless of how mild any recession is. The full dot-com analog and what it means for $NVDA positioning today: Source: iConnections -

Podcast Alpha

145,017 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

CEO of a trillion-dollar company sat in a Stanford classroom in 2011 and explained exactly how he built it. No PR team, no prepared remarks, no investors in the room. No business school has ever added the recording to a syllabus. His name is Jensen Huang. He co-founded NVIDIA in 1993 with $40,000. By 2011 the company was worth $9 billion. Today it is worth over $3 trillion. He walked into the Stanford ASES Summit and gave away the entire playbook to a room of fifty students for free. The lecture is about when to bet everything on one technology before the market knows it exists. He did it with GPUs. Then with CUDA. Then with AI infrastructure. Three bets, same logic, same company, three different industries. The uncomfortable part is what he says about risk. He almost went bankrupt twice. What he did both times is the opposite of what every MBA program teaches. Business schools charge $200K in tuition to teach frameworks he rejected before his company was worth a billion. Every founder podcast repeats the same five lessons. Almost none of them mention what Huang actually did when the company was ninety days from dying. That part is in the lecture. It has been free for fifteen years. Filmed by a student with a handheld camera. Audio cuts in and out. He gave away the playbook of the most valuable company on Earth to fifty people. Almost nobody watched it. One classroom. One camera. The full lecture is free. It is in the video.

CEO of a trillion-dollar company sat in a Stanford classroom in 2011 and explained exactly how he built it. No PR team, no prepared remarks, no investors in the room. No business school has ever added the recording to a syllabus. His name is Jensen Huang. He co-founded NVIDIA in 1993 with $40,000. By 2011 the company was worth $9 billion. Today it is worth over $3 trillion. He walked into the Stanford ASES Summit and gave away the entire playbook to a room of fifty students for free. The lecture is about when to bet everything on one technology before the market knows it exists. He did it with GPUs. Then with CUDA. Then with AI infrastructure. Three bets, same logic, same company, three different industries. The uncomfortable part is what he says about risk. He almost went bankrupt twice. What he did both times is the opposite of what every MBA program teaches. Business schools charge $200K in tuition to teach frameworks he rejected before his company was worth a billion. Every founder podcast repeats the same five lessons. Almost none of them mention what Huang actually did when the company was ninety days from dying. That part is in the lecture. It has been free for fifteen years. Filmed by a student with a handheld camera. Audio cuts in and out. He gave away the playbook of the most valuable company on Earth to fifty people. Almost nobody watched it. One classroom. One camera. The full lecture is free. It is in the video.

Tigerflow

75,616 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The CEO of Palantir sat across from Larry Fink - the man who runs BlackRock and its $11.5 TRILLION in assets - and told Davos the AI race is already lost by everyone pricing it wrong. - he says the firms selling AI by the token have "completely broken" how it works 32-min from the Davos main stage on how AI redefines war, power and who actually controls capital bookmark & watch - it's the most direct AI + power talk of the year

The CEO of Palantir sat across from Larry Fink - the man who runs BlackRock and its $11.5 TRILLION in assets - and told Davos the AI race is already lost by everyone pricing it wrong. - he says the firms selling AI by the token have "completely broken" how it works 32-min from the Davos main stage on how AI redefines war, power and who actually controls capital bookmark & watch - it's the most direct AI + power talk of the year

st1ne

1,007,861 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

THIS BUBBLE IS WORSE THAN 2000 If you have money in the stock market, read this carefully. The market is climbing while liquidity gets pulled out underneath it. Now look at valuations. Shiller CAPE: 42.05. The only time it was higher was 1999, right before the dot-com crash. Buffett Indicator: 229.9%. In 2000, it was 146%. That means today’s market is 1.6x higher than the dot-com peak by that metric. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is not guessing. He is reading the same math. Now concentration. Top 10 stocks control 41% of the S&P 500. They generate only 32% of profits. In 2000, top concentration was 23%. This is not a diversified index anymore. It is a crowded bet on a handful of companies, and most of them are tied to the same AI story. Now add leverage. Margin debt hit $1.28T. That is 4.1% of GDP. In 2000, it was 2.7%. Investors are borrowing more to buy stocks than they did at the dot-com peak. And the reversal may have already started. Margin debt peaked in January 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. The S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled before the market? 2000. 2007. Every time, the market followed. Now look at AI. In 2000, telecom companies spent billions building fiber for “the internet future.” Capex hit 4.5% of GDP. Today, hyperscalers are spending on data centers for “the AI future.” Tech capex is 4.4% of GDP. Almost the same number. Back then, Lucent and Nortel helped finance customers who bought their equipment. Today, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. In 2000, the bubble was internet infrastructure. In 2026, it is AI infrastructure. The companies are bigger now. The spending is bigger. The index concentration is worse. The leverage is higher. And the market is priced like the returns are already guaranteed. That is the danger. If one major earnings report shows AI spending is not paying off, the repricing starts. And with 41% of the index sitting in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. That’s why I’m watching this situation very closely right now. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

THIS BUBBLE IS WORSE THAN 2000 If you have money in the stock market, read this carefully. The market is climbing while liquidity gets pulled out underneath it. Now look at valuations. Shiller CAPE: 42.05. The only time it was higher was 1999, right before the dot-com crash. Buffett Indicator: 229.9%. In 2000, it was 146%. That means today’s market is 1.6x higher than the dot-com peak by that metric. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is not guessing. He is reading the same math. Now concentration. Top 10 stocks control 41% of the S&P 500. They generate only 32% of profits. In 2000, top concentration was 23%. This is not a diversified index anymore. It is a crowded bet on a handful of companies, and most of them are tied to the same AI story. Now add leverage. Margin debt hit $1.28T. That is 4.1% of GDP. In 2000, it was 2.7%. Investors are borrowing more to buy stocks than they did at the dot-com peak. And the reversal may have already started. Margin debt peaked in January 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. The S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled before the market? 2000. 2007. Every time, the market followed. Now look at AI. In 2000, telecom companies spent billions building fiber for “the internet future.” Capex hit 4.5% of GDP. Today, hyperscalers are spending on data centers for “the AI future.” Tech capex is 4.4% of GDP. Almost the same number. Back then, Lucent and Nortel helped finance customers who bought their equipment. Today, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. In 2000, the bubble was internet infrastructure. In 2026, it is AI infrastructure. The companies are bigger now. The spending is bigger. The index concentration is worse. The leverage is higher. And the market is priced like the returns are already guaranteed. That is the danger. If one major earnings report shows AI spending is not paying off, the repricing starts. And with 41% of the index sitting in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. That’s why I’m watching this situation very closely right now. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

Nonzee

83,631 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 THE AI TRADE JUST BROKE. Nasdaq 100 is down 10% from its record. Chips just closed lower four sessions in a row. The moment it turned was July 16. TSMC posted the best quarter in its history. Profit up 77%. Revenue up 33.7%. Then it raised 2026 capex from $56B to $64B and added $100B in Arizona. The stock sold off anyway. Record earnings, and the market sold it. That is the regime change. Good numbers stopped mattering the moment capex started eating the cash flow. Look at what actually changed. The entire AI bull case rested on one assumption: inference gets cheaper. Spend now, scale later, margins explode when compute collapses in price. Here is what happened instead. Memory was 8% of hyperscaler capex in 2023. It is 30% in 2026. Analysts model 48% by 2027. DRAM prices more than doubled this year. LPDDR5 is up over 3x since early 2025. HBM stays short through 2027. Costs are not collapsing. They are compounding. And the market finally noticed the tell. TSMC beat on profit and revenue, then guided capex higher, and the stock sold off. Good earnings are now bearish, because every dollar of capex needs a dollar of return that nobody can show yet. Meanwhile the money still moves in a circle. Anthropic at $965B. OpenAI at $852B. Both funded by the same players buying the same chips. SpaceX down 32% in six weeks, and it is the largest listing in history. This is the same structure as 2000, with better branding. But 2000 did not go straight down either. Nasdaq rallied 40% twice before the real collapse. Both rallies destroyed the shorts who were right too early. That is the phase we are entering now, not the crash. One more squeeze into early 2027. Then the actual dump. I called the $15,768 bottom and the $126,162 top by waiting for exactly this pattern. I am not shorting into the bounce. I am waiting for it to exhaust. Follow and turn notifications on. I post the moment it does.

🚨 THE AI TRADE JUST BROKE. Nasdaq 100 is down 10% from its record. Chips just closed lower four sessions in a row. The moment it turned was July 16. TSMC posted the best quarter in its history. Profit up 77%. Revenue up 33.7%. Then it raised 2026 capex from $56B to $64B and added $100B in Arizona. The stock sold off anyway. Record earnings, and the market sold it. That is the regime change. Good numbers stopped mattering the moment capex started eating the cash flow. Look at what actually changed. The entire AI bull case rested on one assumption: inference gets cheaper. Spend now, scale later, margins explode when compute collapses in price. Here is what happened instead. Memory was 8% of hyperscaler capex in 2023. It is 30% in 2026. Analysts model 48% by 2027. DRAM prices more than doubled this year. LPDDR5 is up over 3x since early 2025. HBM stays short through 2027. Costs are not collapsing. They are compounding. And the market finally noticed the tell. TSMC beat on profit and revenue, then guided capex higher, and the stock sold off. Good earnings are now bearish, because every dollar of capex needs a dollar of return that nobody can show yet. Meanwhile the money still moves in a circle. Anthropic at $965B. OpenAI at $852B. Both funded by the same players buying the same chips. SpaceX down 32% in six weeks, and it is the largest listing in history. This is the same structure as 2000, with better branding. But 2000 did not go straight down either. Nasdaq rallied 40% twice before the real collapse. Both rallies destroyed the shorts who were right too early. That is the phase we are entering now, not the crash. One more squeeze into early 2027. Then the actual dump. I called the $15,768 bottom and the $126,162 top by waiting for exactly this pattern. I am not shorting into the bounce. I am waiting for it to exhaust. Follow and turn notifications on. I post the moment it does.

Nonzee

17,990 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ELON MUSK JUST EXPLAINED WHY HE IGNORES QUARTERLY EARNINGS, AND IT LINES UP WITH TOM LEE MORE THAN IT LOOKS He manages SpaceX on a 5-to-10-year horizon, the Mars spending was disclosed in the S1, and short-term earnings pressure mostly comes from managers whose own pay depends on quick results. Tom Lee's market thesis runs on earnings too, just measured in years, not quarters. He argues profits rising faster than prices is why the S&P is cheaper now than in January, with AI margin expansion still ahead. One ignores the quarter, the other tracks the multi-year trend. Both are pointing in the same direction: the long arc is what counts. I wonder if Tom Lee Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com sees Musk's approach as the same long-term lens he applies to the market.

ELON MUSK JUST EXPLAINED WHY HE IGNORES QUARTERLY EARNINGS, AND IT LINES UP WITH TOM LEE MORE THAN IT LOOKS He manages SpaceX on a 5-to-10-year horizon, the Mars spending was disclosed in the S1, and short-term earnings pressure mostly comes from managers whose own pay depends on quick results. Tom Lee's market thesis runs on earnings too, just measured in years, not quarters. He argues profits rising faster than prices is why the S&P is cheaper now than in January, with AI margin expansion still ahead. One ignores the quarter, the other tracks the multi-year trend. Both are pointing in the same direction: the long arc is what counts. I wonder if Tom Lee Thomas (Tom) Lee (not drummer) FundstratDirect.com sees Musk's approach as the same long-term lens he applies to the market.

Tom Lee Tracker (Not actually Tom)

111,189 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY WIERD IS HAPPENING. The S&P 500 keeps printing new highs. Everyone is celebrating. Nobody is looking at what's actually holding it up. Semiconductor stocks are now worth $13.4 trillion. 19.7% of the entire index. Five years ago that number was closer to 5%. It quadrupled in a single cycle on a single bet. AI. And here's the number that should concern everyone. AI chips generate 50% of all semiconductor revenue. They represent less than 0.2% of total chip shipments. Half the revenue, a fraction of the volume, trillions in market cap sitting on top of a sliver of actual production. Three companies are carrying all of it. Nvidia. Broadcom. TSMC. The same names in every major institutional portfolio simultaneously. Everyone owns them, nobody can afford to be the first one out. And the way the money moves inside this system should sound familiar. Big players fund AI startups. AI startups spend that money on Big Tech infrastructure. Big Tech reports record AI revenue. Valuations justify the next round, the same dollar completes the loop and gets counted as growth every time. We watched this exact dynamic play out once before. 2000. A handful of tech companies carried the entire market. Valuations made no sense, narratives did the work that fundamentals couldn't. Then one company missed earnings, then another, then the S&P lost 50% and the Nasdaq lost 78%. The current setup is more concentrated, the valuations are more extreme. And one cut in AI spending is all it takes to start the unwind. I called the $16K Bitcoin bottom. I called the $126K top. Every major turn for 15 years public, before the move. The next call is already forming. Follow now and turn on notifications, you'll understand why that matters sooner than you think.$

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY WIERD IS HAPPENING. The S&P 500 keeps printing new highs. Everyone is celebrating. Nobody is looking at what's actually holding it up. Semiconductor stocks are now worth $13.4 trillion. 19.7% of the entire index. Five years ago that number was closer to 5%. It quadrupled in a single cycle on a single bet. AI. And here's the number that should concern everyone. AI chips generate 50% of all semiconductor revenue. They represent less than 0.2% of total chip shipments. Half the revenue, a fraction of the volume, trillions in market cap sitting on top of a sliver of actual production. Three companies are carrying all of it. Nvidia. Broadcom. TSMC. The same names in every major institutional portfolio simultaneously. Everyone owns them, nobody can afford to be the first one out. And the way the money moves inside this system should sound familiar. Big players fund AI startups. AI startups spend that money on Big Tech infrastructure. Big Tech reports record AI revenue. Valuations justify the next round, the same dollar completes the loop and gets counted as growth every time. We watched this exact dynamic play out once before. 2000. A handful of tech companies carried the entire market. Valuations made no sense, narratives did the work that fundamentals couldn't. Then one company missed earnings, then another, then the S&P lost 50% and the Nasdaq lost 78%. The current setup is more concentrated, the valuations are more extreme. And one cut in AI spending is all it takes to start the unwind. I called the $16K Bitcoin bottom. I called the $126K top. Every major turn for 15 years public, before the move. The next call is already forming. Follow now and turn on notifications, you'll understand why that matters sooner than you think.

Hanzo ㊗️

18,356 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

AI BUBBLE IS BIGGER THAN DOTCOM. Shiller CAPE: 42.32. Last seen in 1999. Buffett Indicator: 229.9% vs 146% in 2000. 1.6x worse. Top 10 stocks: 41% of S&P vs 23% in 2000. Margin debt: $1.28T = 4.1% GDP vs 2.7% in 2000. Margin debt peaked Jan 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled over before the market? 2000. 2007. In 2000, Lucent helped finance customers who bought Lucent equipment. In 2026, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is reading the same math. One bad earnings report on AI spending and the repricing starts. With 41% of the index in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

AI BUBBLE IS BIGGER THAN DOTCOM. Shiller CAPE: 42.32. Last seen in 1999. Buffett Indicator: 229.9% vs 146% in 2000. 1.6x worse. Top 10 stocks: 41% of S&P vs 23% in 2000. Margin debt: $1.28T = 4.1% GDP vs 2.7% in 2000. Margin debt peaked Jan 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled over before the market? 2000. 2007. In 2000, Lucent helped finance customers who bought Lucent equipment. In 2026, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is reading the same math. One bad earnings report on AI spending and the repricing starts. With 41% of the index in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

Nonzee

299,479 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 SOMETHING DOESN’T ADD UP WITH THIS. Recession odds just collapsed to an all-time low of 20%. And somehow, everyone is reading that as BULLISH. Maybe. But history says the market usually breaks BEFORE recession becomes obvious. 2000: S&P 500 topped first. Then came the recession. The market eventually fell more than 50%. 2008: Same story. Stocks were still near the highs while the economy was already weakening underneath. Then the S&P 500 lost more than half its value. 2020 was faster. Recession hit, panic exploded, and the market dropped more than 30% almost instantly. That’s the part people forget. The market doesn’t wait for the headline. It prices the problem BEFORE everyone agrees the problem exists. Now recession odds are supposedly near record lows. Meanwhile the S&P 500 is sitting near ATHs again. Maybe this time really is different. Or maybe 2026–2028 is the next chapter on this chart. I know which setup I’m watching. Remember: I publicly called Bitcoin’s $17K bottom in 2022 and $126K top in 2025. Then I called the $58K local bottom in 2026. My next call will be posted here first. Follow and turn on notifications.

🚨 SOMETHING DOESN’T ADD UP WITH THIS. Recession odds just collapsed to an all-time low of 20%. And somehow, everyone is reading that as BULLISH. Maybe. But history says the market usually breaks BEFORE recession becomes obvious. 2000: S&P 500 topped first. Then came the recession. The market eventually fell more than 50%. 2008: Same story. Stocks were still near the highs while the economy was already weakening underneath. Then the S&P 500 lost more than half its value. 2020 was faster. Recession hit, panic exploded, and the market dropped more than 30% almost instantly. That’s the part people forget. The market doesn’t wait for the headline. It prices the problem BEFORE everyone agrees the problem exists. Now recession odds are supposedly near record lows. Meanwhile the S&P 500 is sitting near ATHs again. Maybe this time really is different. Or maybe 2026–2028 is the next chapter on this chart. I know which setup I’m watching. Remember: I publicly called Bitcoin’s $17K bottom in 2022 and $126K top in 2025. Then I called the $58K local bottom in 2026. My next call will be posted here first. Follow and turn on notifications.

DANNY

57,539 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THE CHART 🚨 This overlay says everything White candles represent the full dotcom cycle of 2000, growth and collapse As you can see, they align perfectly with the AI bubble price action right now And yes, history is about to repeat The reason isn't random In 2000 it was Cisco and Intel Every company rushed to buy chips for the internet revolution Then the buildout slowed, orders collapsed, and the companies that supplied the boom got hit hardest In 2025 it was Nvidia Every company rushed to buy chips for the AI revolution The buildout is slowing now too Different era, same mania, same index, same chart And you already know how the dotcom version ended If you've been following me closely you knew when and why S&P 500 would start correcting Many of my followers also took profit from the GOLD pump The next stock market updates will be the most important ones The reason is simple - we're entering a correction phase Turn on notifications and you'll realize how much valuable info you've been missing by not doing it sooner

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THE CHART 🚨 This overlay says everything White candles represent the full dotcom cycle of 2000, growth and collapse As you can see, they align perfectly with the AI bubble price action right now And yes, history is about to repeat The reason isn't random In 2000 it was Cisco and Intel Every company rushed to buy chips for the internet revolution Then the buildout slowed, orders collapsed, and the companies that supplied the boom got hit hardest In 2025 it was Nvidia Every company rushed to buy chips for the AI revolution The buildout is slowing now too Different era, same mania, same index, same chart And you already know how the dotcom version ended If you've been following me closely you knew when and why S&P 500 would start correcting Many of my followers also took profit from the GOLD pump The next stock market updates will be the most important ones The reason is simple - we're entering a correction phase Turn on notifications and you'll realize how much valuable info you've been missing by not doing it sooner

NoName

904,802 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is not a recession-based situation. The economy is on fire as measured by the earnings of the S&P. No one saw this coming but Trump is the first AI president, he's getting the benefit of margin enhancement and productivity enhancement across all 11 sectors as all of these companies in the S&P 500 adopt AI. You would think at this point with two wars, tariffs in the US, instability of inflation, and bond prices going up, that the market would sell off, but it's not because it sees around the corner that the American economy is on fire because of the benefit of AI.

This is not a recession-based situation. The economy is on fire as measured by the earnings of the S&P. No one saw this coming but Trump is the first AI president, he's getting the benefit of margin enhancement and productivity enhancement across all 11 sectors as all of these companies in the S&P 500 adopt AI. You would think at this point with two wars, tariffs in the US, instability of inflation, and bond prices going up, that the market would sell off, but it's not because it sees around the corner that the American economy is on fire because of the benefit of AI.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

52,129 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

🚨 YOU NEED TO SEE THIS S&P 500 CHART 🚨 For 100 years the stock market has followed the same simple pattern. Long boom -> Short crash -> Long boom -> Short crash Every boom was powered by a new technology that changed how the world works - Computers - Internet - Smartphones Each one took 10-15 years to fully play out That's why the booms lasted 25 years But now comes AI And problem is AI changed the market in 2 years. Not 15 The boom ran out of fuel too fast And when the fuel runs out - the crash begins And that's exactly where we are right now The next 9 years will look nothing like the last 25 Get ready! FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!

🚨 YOU NEED TO SEE THIS S&P 500 CHART 🚨 For 100 years the stock market has followed the same simple pattern. Long boom -> Short crash -> Long boom -> Short crash Every boom was powered by a new technology that changed how the world works - Computers - Internet - Smartphones Each one took 10-15 years to fully play out That's why the booms lasted 25 years But now comes AI And problem is AI changed the market in 2 years. Not 15 The boom ran out of fuel too fast And when the fuel runs out - the crash begins And that's exactly where we are right now The next 9 years will look nothing like the last 25 Get ready! FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!

NoName

46,511 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Apple just made every tech giant that went all in on AI look like clowns. For 12 months straight, Apple was the "biggest loser" of the AI era. Its AI team kept losing people. Its Siri overhaul kept getting delayed. And every headline said the same thing: Apple missed the biggest technology shift in a generation. But turns out, the OPPOSITE is actually the case... Apple passed Nvidia to briefly become the most valuable company on Earth again, worth around $4.88 trillion. Apple is up nearly 23% this year. Nvidia is up just 7.3%. Apple is now the best performer in the entire Mag 7. And when you look at why, it's almost funny. Apple won by REFUSING to spend the money everyone said it had to spend. Look at what the rest of Big Tech committed to the AI buildout this year: - Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft are spending more than $665 billion combined - Apple is spending about $13.5 billion - That is nearly 50x less than its rivals For a year, that gap was "proof" that Apple had fumbled it. Then the AI trade broke, and the company with no giant AI bill suddenly looked like the smartest one in the room. Apple never took on the risk. It never borrowed the billions to build data centers, and it never had to promise Wall Street that all that spending would pay off later. So when the trade cracked this week, Apple had nothing to crack. It still runs on iPhones and a services business that keeps setting records, not on a bet about AI revenue that has not shown up yet. And the crack itself was real: A Chinese startup called Moonshot dropped a new model that rivals the best from OpenAI and Anthropic, and it messed up the whole market in a single day. Investors are already calling it a Kimi moment, a rerun of the DeepSeek shock that hit these same stocks last year. The Philadelphia semiconductor index fell into a bear market, down 20% from its June peak. The Nasdaq 100 had its worst week in almost a month. Microsoft is now down 20% on the year, its worst stretch since 2022. Every company that went all in on the buildout got hit. Apple, the one that sat it out, is the company that came out on top. Why does this matter? Because for two years the entire market ran on one belief: Spend the most on AI or get left behind. The companies that spent $665 billion were called visionaries. The company that spent $13.5 billion was called a dinosaur. This week the market briefly went the other way. HSBC just upgraded Apple and lifted its price target to $366 from $260. Money that was chasing chips is now hiding in the one megacap with almost no exposure to the thing that just blew up. And the doubts are reaching the top now too: Societe Generale's head of US equity strategy warned this week that the biggest AI spenders are still burning cash so fast that investors are openly asking whether the spending ever pays off. What happens next: Nobody knows if this holds. Apple could lose the top spot again by Monday, and the AI bulls will tell you the buildout always looks reckless right before it pays off. But something bigger happened this week... For one day, the market stopped rewarding the biggest spender and started rewarding the one that kept its wallet shut. If that keeps happening, every board that bet the company on AI has a real problem. And the company that got mocked for doing the least became the safest place to hide from the trade it skipped. What do you think?

Apple just made every tech giant that went all in on AI look like clowns. For 12 months straight, Apple was the "biggest loser" of the AI era. Its AI team kept losing people. Its Siri overhaul kept getting delayed. And every headline said the same thing: Apple missed the biggest technology shift in a generation. But turns out, the OPPOSITE is actually the case... Apple passed Nvidia to briefly become the most valuable company on Earth again, worth around $4.88 trillion. Apple is up nearly 23% this year. Nvidia is up just 7.3%. Apple is now the best performer in the entire Mag 7. And when you look at why, it's almost funny. Apple won by REFUSING to spend the money everyone said it had to spend. Look at what the rest of Big Tech committed to the AI buildout this year: - Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft are spending more than $665 billion combined - Apple is spending about $13.5 billion - That is nearly 50x less than its rivals For a year, that gap was "proof" that Apple had fumbled it. Then the AI trade broke, and the company with no giant AI bill suddenly looked like the smartest one in the room. Apple never took on the risk. It never borrowed the billions to build data centers, and it never had to promise Wall Street that all that spending would pay off later. So when the trade cracked this week, Apple had nothing to crack. It still runs on iPhones and a services business that keeps setting records, not on a bet about AI revenue that has not shown up yet. And the crack itself was real: A Chinese startup called Moonshot dropped a new model that rivals the best from OpenAI and Anthropic, and it messed up the whole market in a single day. Investors are already calling it a Kimi moment, a rerun of the DeepSeek shock that hit these same stocks last year. The Philadelphia semiconductor index fell into a bear market, down 20% from its June peak. The Nasdaq 100 had its worst week in almost a month. Microsoft is now down 20% on the year, its worst stretch since 2022. Every company that went all in on the buildout got hit. Apple, the one that sat it out, is the company that came out on top. Why does this matter? Because for two years the entire market ran on one belief: Spend the most on AI or get left behind. The companies that spent $665 billion were called visionaries. The company that spent $13.5 billion was called a dinosaur. This week the market briefly went the other way. HSBC just upgraded Apple and lifted its price target to $366 from $260. Money that was chasing chips is now hiding in the one megacap with almost no exposure to the thing that just blew up. And the doubts are reaching the top now too: Societe Generale's head of US equity strategy warned this week that the biggest AI spenders are still burning cash so fast that investors are openly asking whether the spending ever pays off. What happens next: Nobody knows if this holds. Apple could lose the top spot again by Monday, and the AI bulls will tell you the buildout always looks reckless right before it pays off. But something bigger happened this week... For one day, the market stopped rewarding the biggest spender and started rewarding the one that kept its wallet shut. If that keeps happening, every board that bet the company on AI has a real problem. And the company that got mocked for doing the least became the safest place to hide from the trade it skipped. What do you think?

Ricardo

37,412 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

this is f*cking insane. Matthew Gallagher is the first one-man billion-dollar company. He built it SOLO with AI. $20,000 and two months to start. $401 million in year one, on track for $1.8 billion. Hims & Hers does the same business with 2,000 employees. Not a smaller team. No team. The AI writes the code. It answers the patients. It takes his calls in a clone of his voice. That is the whole org chart. Bookmark this before your feed buries it. Read the full guide below.

this is f*cking insane. Matthew Gallagher is the first one-man billion-dollar company. He built it SOLO with AI. $20,000 and two months to start. $401 million in year one, on track for $1.8 billion. Hims & Hers does the same business with 2,000 employees. Not a smaller team. No team. The AI writes the code. It answers the patients. It takes his calls in a clone of his voice. That is the whole org chart. Bookmark this before your feed buries it. Read the full guide below.

Jey

146,484 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

After Enron collapsed, Ken Griffin went hunting for its best energy traders. One of Citadel’s biggest targets was John Arnold, who had reportedly made Enron ~$750 million trading natural gas the year before. “They sent a whole team down to Houston, set up offices in the hotel across the street from the Enron building and just started interviewing almost everybody on the floor.” Arnold kept saying no. Then Griffin called Arnold at the airport and asked if he could talk. Arnold told him he was headed to Colorado. “[Griffin] calls back a few minutes later and says, ‘If I come to Colorado tomorrow, will you meet with me?’” Arnold took the meeting, but ultimately decided the economics were better if he went out on his own. The rest is history: Arnold founded Centaurus Energy in 2002. Five years later, at 33 he became the youngest billionaire in America.

After Enron collapsed, Ken Griffin went hunting for its best energy traders. One of Citadel’s biggest targets was John Arnold, who had reportedly made Enron ~$750 million trading natural gas the year before. “They sent a whole team down to Houston, set up offices in the hotel across the street from the Enron building and just started interviewing almost everybody on the floor.” Arnold kept saying no. Then Griffin called Arnold at the airport and asked if he could talk. Arnold told him he was headed to Colorado. “[Griffin] calls back a few minutes later and says, ‘If I come to Colorado tomorrow, will you meet with me?’” Arnold took the meeting, but ultimately decided the economics were better if he went out on his own. The rest is history: Arnold founded Centaurus Energy in 2002. Five years later, at 33 he became the youngest billionaire in America.

TBPN

55,313 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🚨 BREAKING: TECH COMPANIES ARE STRAIGHT FALSIFICATING EARNINGS Microsoft just gave OpenAI $13 BILLION OpenAI invested it back to Azure Microsoft booked it as revenue OpenAI booked it as a revenue too Amazon and Google are running similar loops with Anthropic while marking up huge paper gains from AI valuations Nvidia and Oracle don't even hide this scheme anymore OpenAI is spending over $60 BILLION a year on compute while generating only $25 BILLION in revenue. Ray Dalio, one of the most profitable investors in the world, has warned that late stage bubbles are driven by fake flows, not real economics He saw it before in 2000, 2008 Now he warns the same ponzi is happening at bigger scale That is exactly the definition of top of the market Keep in mind: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for over 10 YEARS I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again That’s literally my job If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret

🚨 BREAKING: TECH COMPANIES ARE STRAIGHT FALSIFICATING EARNINGS Microsoft just gave OpenAI $13 BILLION OpenAI invested it back to Azure Microsoft booked it as revenue OpenAI booked it as a revenue too Amazon and Google are running similar loops with Anthropic while marking up huge paper gains from AI valuations Nvidia and Oracle don't even hide this scheme anymore OpenAI is spending over $60 BILLION a year on compute while generating only $25 BILLION in revenue. Ray Dalio, one of the most profitable investors in the world, has warned that late stage bubbles are driven by fake flows, not real economics He saw it before in 2000, 2008 Now he warns the same ponzi is happening at bigger scale That is exactly the definition of top of the market Keep in mind: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for over 10 YEARS I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again That’s literally my job If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret

Hopper

18,271 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ON LIVE TELEVISION HE SAYS EVERY HOTEL COMPANY IN THE WORLD IS DONE. THE TRADE HE RAN ALONGSIDE THAT WARNING PAID OUT $2.6 BILLION. The man on the phone is Bill Ackman, who runs Pershing Square Capital. Three weeks earlier he had bought $27 million of insurance against a collapse nobody else was pricing. On March 18, 2020, he called the network to say the shutdown was inevitable. Then the anchor asked about Hilton, and Ackman told him what he was doing with his own money while he said it. 0:37 "I've been super bearish, but I got bullish. And the reason why I got bullish, I've been aggressively buying stocks, including Hilton today. And I've been buying all the way down." Buying all the way down. Four words from the man who had just explained why every hotel company on earth was about to die. Behind him on the board, Hilton is down 22 percent on the day and 38 percent on the week, the strap under his face reads RISK OF HILTON HOTEL GOING TO ZERO, and he gives the arithmetic anyway: no business survives 18 months with no revenue. Five days later he closed the insurance for $2.6 billion and put it to work in the stocks he had just buried: Hilton, Berkshire Hathaway, Starbucks, Lowe's. 1:00 "The only answer for the world is to shut the world for 30 days." In the clip he explains why the doom and the buying are the same decision, and the reason is not the one most people assume. People hear a billionaire predict the end of the world and assume he wanted it. The tape says otherwise: warning and buying, same read, same breath. Watch 0:42, where the man who just said every hotel company is done tells the anchor he bought Hilton today. Before you act on a forecast, find out what the forecaster owns. The only half of a prediction you can check is what it holds.

ON LIVE TELEVISION HE SAYS EVERY HOTEL COMPANY IN THE WORLD IS DONE. THE TRADE HE RAN ALONGSIDE THAT WARNING PAID OUT $2.6 BILLION. The man on the phone is Bill Ackman, who runs Pershing Square Capital. Three weeks earlier he had bought $27 million of insurance against a collapse nobody else was pricing. On March 18, 2020, he called the network to say the shutdown was inevitable. Then the anchor asked about Hilton, and Ackman told him what he was doing with his own money while he said it. 0:37 "I've been super bearish, but I got bullish. And the reason why I got bullish, I've been aggressively buying stocks, including Hilton today. And I've been buying all the way down." Buying all the way down. Four words from the man who had just explained why every hotel company on earth was about to die. Behind him on the board, Hilton is down 22 percent on the day and 38 percent on the week, the strap under his face reads RISK OF HILTON HOTEL GOING TO ZERO, and he gives the arithmetic anyway: no business survives 18 months with no revenue. Five days later he closed the insurance for $2.6 billion and put it to work in the stocks he had just buried: Hilton, Berkshire Hathaway, Starbucks, Lowe's. 1:00 "The only answer for the world is to shut the world for 30 days." In the clip he explains why the doom and the buying are the same decision, and the reason is not the one most people assume. People hear a billionaire predict the end of the world and assume he wanted it. The tape says otherwise: warning and buying, same read, same breath. Watch 0:42, where the man who just said every hotel company is done tells the anchor he bought Hilton today. Before you act on a forecast, find out what the forecaster owns. The only half of a prediction you can check is what it holds.

Chalk

557,686 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?

Marlow

513,913 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The most important financial system on earth has nobody in charge of it. Not by accident. By choice. Almost every global transaction runs on dollars created offshore, outside the US. China and the world depend on them. So who is responsible for that system? Nobody. The Fed says its mandate stops at the border. In 2008, when the offshore market broke down in London, Fed officials called it a Bank of England problem. Not ours. Back in the 1960s, officials game-planned who would step in if it broke. Then they decided it did not matter. So no one took the job. 2008 proved that a disaster. More than a decade later, nothing has changed. We still run the world's reserve currency with no one accountable for it.

The most important financial system on earth has nobody in charge of it. Not by accident. By choice. Almost every global transaction runs on dollars created offshore, outside the US. China and the world depend on them. So who is responsible for that system? Nobody. The Fed says its mandate stops at the border. In 2008, when the offshore market broke down in London, Fed officials called it a Bank of England problem. Not ours. Back in the 1960s, officials game-planned who would step in if it broke. Then they decided it did not matter. So no one took the job. 2008 proved that a disaster. More than a decade later, nothing has changed. We still run the world's reserve currency with no one accountable for it.

Jeffrey P. Snider

17,339 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

🚨 TESLA DRIVER FREAKS OUT AFTER HIS CAR STOPS DEAD IN A GRAVEYARD — THEN IT STARTS DETECTING “BODIES” ALL AROUND HIM This man was driving through a graveyard when his Tesla suddenly stops so hard he says it felt like he hit a pole. Except there’s nothing in front of him. Then he looks at the screen. His Tesla is detecting dozens of human figures surrounding the car and standing directly in the road. There’s just one problem: The driver says nobody is actually there. “I promise to God.” “This literally stopped my car in the middle of the road!” Then things get even darker. He says he suddenly gets a headache and immediately starts praying against any “attachments.” He tries to keep driving. Then the Tesla stops again. “Literally just did it again. Just did it again!” This wasn’t just weird figures appearing on a screen... his car was physically stopping as if something was standing in its path. What the hell was his Tesla detecting in that graveyard?

🚨 TESLA DRIVER FREAKS OUT AFTER HIS CAR STOPS DEAD IN A GRAVEYARD — THEN IT STARTS DETECTING “BODIES” ALL AROUND HIM This man was driving through a graveyard when his Tesla suddenly stops so hard he says it felt like he hit a pole. Except there’s nothing in front of him. Then he looks at the screen. His Tesla is detecting dozens of human figures surrounding the car and standing directly in the road. There’s just one problem: The driver says nobody is actually there. “I promise to God.” “This literally stopped my car in the middle of the road!” Then things get even darker. He says he suddenly gets a headache and immediately starts praying against any “attachments.” He tries to keep driving. Then the Tesla stops again. “Literally just did it again. Just did it again!” This wasn’t just weird figures appearing on a screen... his car was physically stopping as if something was standing in its path. What the hell was his Tesla detecting in that graveyard?

HustleBitch

149,161 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen