正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

‼️🚨JOHN HECHE IN SHINYANGA PROVES STRONG GRASSROOTS SUPPORT FOR CHANGE‼️ John Heche the Deputy Chair of Chadema is in Shinyanga for public meetings. His reception and the inpromptu fundraiser drive that followed is testimony to the wider population support for Change. Why? Because Heche and Tundu Lissu are seen...

45,012 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Robertson King 的头像
Robertson King6 天前

Kesho final submissions upande wa Tundu Lissu na washitaki wauaji Samia na genge lake la kangaroo court (hawana hadhi ya Jamuhuri). Umma tunasubiri hukumu yao, wajiandae kwa heri au kwa shari.

Tonny 的头像
Tonny6 天前

sasa fikiria, miji yote mikubwa nchini, hali yenyewe ndiyo hii. wote wakija jitokeza siku moja nchi nzima, wakibeba kaulimbiu moja, "whatever it is", itakuwa patashika nguo kuchanika. TUSISUBIRI HAYO YATOKEE.

Misenobi 的头像
Misenobi6 天前

Politics or Religion consides at BELIEF, if you BELIEVE then you are in agreement with what each stands for. At this time and NOW,if you are a TRUE TANGANYIKAN and not yet believing?Only LISSU/HECHE have proved and can make you believe.WAKE the HELL UP and JOIN THEM now! 🇹🇿🔥👊✌️

Hustler 的头像
Hustler6 天前

Things I like to see. People have a desire to change. Must are desperate for changes, we must move from being a laughing stock to an asset. ccm has played us for so long. This political drift holds a clear message against our oppressors. The clock is ticking.

Mlima Sayuni 的头像
Mlima Sayuni6 天前

Shinyanga mjini ni jimbo la nyumbani kwa #mhuni Patrobas Katambi aliyezuia mikutano ya hadhara kihuni kabla ya kubanwa p*mbu akaachia, Leo @ChademaTZ2 wamefanya mkutano wao wa KWANZA kwa kumpelekea moto🔥🔥 nyumbani kwake,mmmmae.

DeezyMe 的头像
DeezyMe6 天前

@ModdyDezzy Power to the people 🔥🔥

YUSUPH ✌️ 的头像
YUSUPH ✌️6 天前

Kwa sasa value yake haipimiki

Yusuph Abel 的头像
Yusuph Abel6 天前

Peleka moto 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Mihayo Kallaye 的头像
Mihayo Kallaye6 天前

hasta la victoria siempre! Nguvu ipo kwetu ni suala la muda tuu✊🏿

Mwinshehe 🕊️ 的头像
Mwinshehe 🕊️6 天前

@YusuphBonito1 👏👏👏👏

相关视频

🚨🚨‼️IMPORTANT UPDATE‼️ A credible source has informed me that the Govt is setting up a fake medical report in Dodoma aa they seek to involve John Heche in an incident that he was not involved. Sigrada - a leader within Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo had an altercation with a guard outside a meeting in Njombe that Heche was chairing! Now she claims to have been hurt badly and Chama Cha Mapinduzi have taken over! Watch how they forced doctors in Iringa hospital to allow them to transfer Sigrada to Dodoma despite doctors refusing! They are looking at ways to arrest Heche for something he didn’t even know had happened! Dirty tricks are textbook tactics of CCM Taarifa kutoka mdau anayeaminika Dodoma kanitonya kuwa muda huu wanaandaa ripoti kusema Sigrada amevilia damu kwenye ubongo na wanataka wamkamate LEO Heche eti alikuwa mwenyekiti wa kikao wakati Sigrada kaparuana na mlinzi NJE kwa mujibu wa ushuhuda wake! Heche hata hakuwa na taarifa hadi baadaye! Daktari atakayekubali kusaini ripoti hii feki na kuingia kwenye huu ujinga AFUTIWE leseni na Medical Association of Tanzania (MAT) 🚮 Madaktari wa Iringa waligoma kufanya huu mchezo ndiyo maana naambiwa wamemhamisha Dodoma! Msichafue tasnia ya udaktari! Kama vipi kubalini madaktari wanaoaminiwa na Chadema wafanye vipimo pia na mthibitishe hii ilisababishwa na kipigo hicho na si ninyi mmembonda kichwani na fimbo kama Ndugai alivyofanya 🙄 maana ndo zenu! We Emmanuel Nchimbi na Makala mmeishiwa kabisa! Msicheze na wananchi! Tumewachoka ondokeni kwa amani! Na huyu Sigrada mwambieni watamwua asicheze na hawa jamaa Eniwei #TutaelewanaTu

Maria Sarungi Tsehai

49,370 次观看 • 1 年前

Nobody cares what Sussan Ley says. It really is that simple. For the past week, members of the coalition and the mainstream media condemned the idea of people marching for Australia. Marching to send a strong message to Canberra that our immigration levels are too high, which they really are. Yet the Australian people came out in force. A peaceful force. People of all ethnicities who see Australia as their common bond all marched together. They marched in the middle of an economic crisis. They marched during a major housing shortage. They had a a simple message – put Australia first. Things are bad and they are getting worse. Young people are struggling to find meaningful work that pays enough to cover their rent. The idea of homeownership for them - a pipedream. It has never been this hard, and it will only get better when the politicians start listening. Ley as leader of the opposition is supposed to be the voice of an alternative government… with alternative ideas. The opposition should be giving a voice to the millions of Australians that are demanding change. Ordinary Australians are not naturally street protestors, and when they feel the need to come out in their thousands across the country, it is only because they don’t feel like they are being heard or represented in parliament. It is really Sussan's failure to do her job that has caused this circumstance. The truth is the protests only happened because the so-called opposition is absolutely useless right now. Ley simply apes the government’s narratives, opposing the very people that should prefer to vote for her. The best way to capture the spirit of a nation is not to chide them, chastise them or patronise them - like a primary school vice principal coaching the debate team. Sussan’s job is to give a voice to the voiceless. To speak for the forgotten Australians who are being badly hurt by Albanese’s open border policies, and inability to correct the economic slide. Regrettably, I fear the right-of-centre street activism will continue to build. More and more ordinary, taxpaying and hardworking Australians will see fit to hit the streets demanding a voice, until there is something like an opposition. Albanese is a terrible prime minister, hardly a man of the people, not charismatic and easy to beat. Ley, Littleproud, O’Brien and their coalition team are just that bad, that Albanese can do as he pleases - hurting the people of Australia. No amount of lecturing or wishful thinking from Ley and her parliamentary supporters will change the fact that the Australian people want to see change. Authentic, real and meaningful change. Not just a controlled opposition. We need the sort of change the leftwing powerbrokers in the coalition don’t want to see. Change that is is bad for their back-pockets. Change the politicians don’t want to see, because it will limit their future careers as global elite champagne sipping bureaucrats, working for the OECD or some other useless organisation. But it is only when that change comes that there will be support for their party. It is only change that will bring the temperature down. If the coalition don’t make significant change, they will simply die out completely. The first step is to replace Sussan with someone who believes in Australia and knows how to fix the place. That or get out of the way. It’s urgent. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

51,120 次观看 • 1 年前

A message regarding Iran and the popular rebellion DiEM25, and I personally, are in full solidarity with Iranians resisting theocratic brutality — especially women, workers, students. We don’t forget: WOMAN-LIFE-FREEDOM, but also minorities risking everything for dignity and freedom. At the same time, I reject cynical attempts by foreign powers, the United States and Israel in particular, to hijack this uprising for their regime-change agendas or the return of Reza Pahlavi, the brutal Savac, the awful legacy of his father’s regime. Foreign interference doesn’t a legitimate uprising make. But nor does foreign interference make an uprising illegitimate. What it does do is that it makes its political independence more vital. Real solidarity means amplifying Iranian voices that are for Iran, not foreign powers; not the CIA or Mossad. Real solidarity means opposing war and coercive sanctions that punish ordinary people. Real solidarity means refusing externally curated “leaders”. As our governments continue to toe Washington’s line, the task is to pressure, inform, and educate — and extend concrete support to Iranians pursuing their own vision of a free Iran. History shows that regimes fall — sometimes with catastrophic results for the people, sometimes with beneficial results for the people. History also shows that oppressed peoples have no choice other than to rebel so that today’s popular struggle can become tomorrow’s organised force for political liberation.

Yanis Varoufakis

550,133 次观看 • 8 个月前

“The war did not change Russia. It revealed Russia.” - Rihards Kols Rihards Kols, Latvian Member of the European Parliament, speaking at the #RigaConf2026 plenary session "Preparing for Russia Remade by War". “It is important correction we need to make in this room. The war did not change Russia. It revealed Russia. And this is precisely, and I will reiterate, that for years some of us in this region said this plainly, and we were told that we are exaggerating. There are some who are still saying that the Baltics, our region, we are exaggerating, that we were prisoners of our own history. So the war did not create new Russia. It stripped away the excuses that let people pretend the old one was becoming something else. And that is something being spread across Europe. Already was mentioned the dynamics on day to day. What is the changing on the war efforts, war economy? And obviously we can reiterate the numbers. Obviously the Russia today spends roughly 7 to 8% of GDP and roughly 40% of federal budget expenditure on defense and security. And it is the highest share since the Soviet collapse. And that should be noted. But on top of that, which is more alarming, is that church, state media, education curricula, industry, the courts have all been folded into a single machine whose output is the war effort. And that has to be registered. And really, do not make no mistake. That is not wartime mobilisation in the sense we understand in democracy, when we speak about a temporary redirection of resources toward an external goal. It is the opposite. The war has become the organising principle of the state itself, and the state has organised everything else around sustaining it. So I want to be really blunt, because I think this room can handle it from seeing familiar faces. Russia is not a state that happens to be run by a strong man who came out of the KGB. Russia is a state built and operated by security services, for security services as a permanent condition. putin is not aberration sitting on top of normal state apparatus. He is the product of the apparatus, and so is whoever comes after him. We, we ask often and in this format as well, in previous years, what happens after putin? We are asking the wrong question. The right question is what happens to the system whose entire logic is a threat detection, repression, and control regardless of who occupies the top chair. Individuals do leave voluntarily or through windows or having too much tea. The services, the networks, the operating logic, they remain. And there is a comfortable story in the Western capitals that ordinary Russians are quietly against this war, that repression is holding back at Latin majority that would choose differently if only given a chance. I do not believe that, and frankly the evidence does not support it. If there were a real organised majority demand for change inside Russia, we would see it. Not because Russians are uniquely passive, history proves the opposite when the conditions are right. But because when a majority generally wants a change, it finds a way to make that one visible, costly to ignore, and difficult to suppress indefinitely. So the simple, uncomfortable logic conclusion is this. The absence of visible mass demand for change is itself the evidence. Passive discontent that never translates into political consequence is not resistance, it is accommodation. And there is the line I want people to sit with. You cannot wake up someone who is only pretending to be asleep. A society that quietly benefits from empire, that quietly enjoys the mobilisation of victimhood and grievance the Kremlin sells it, does not need waking. It needs to be confronted with costs it cannot ignore.” 1/2

Yasmina

52,450 次观看 • 15 天前

AGAIN, I will never stop sharing this. And I’ll never understand why it wasn’t highlighted and played before the jury. The old man that walked around the confrontation, was in a conversation with John immediately before, then walked around it all and went outside and had a long conversation with BA, BH, NA and CA. He knows! Furthermore, this tied the whole thing together like the end of a movie. It was the missing piece. They all lied and never mentioned it. Why? JM was standing there talking to Karen. So… 11:32pm: BH texts KR “ummmmm…well?” 11:57pm - 11:58pm: BH gives John the middle finger, yells across the room at him, is held back by CA, gestures for JO to come outside. 12:11am: John walks out with the rocks glass and is seen for the last time alive as he heads to 34F. 12:20am: BH, despite saying he never talked to John, didn’t know John was going to 34F and didn’t talk to him as he left, he texts what’s now known as a challenge, not an invite, “are you coming???” 12:21am: John arrives at 34F and goes straight to the basement. 12:30am: KR pulls away from 34F. 12:32am: John’s phone stops moving. 12:36am: KR connected to John’s WiFi. 2:22am: BA “butt dials” BH which was immediately returned by another “butt dial” from BH and they have a :22 call. 2:27am: JM gets home and googles “hos long to die in cold?” 6:03am: John is found beaten and dead on the lawn of 34F. How is this not the most obvious thing ever? But I will also never understand why this wasn’t highlighted. These are some of the most brilliant litigators in the country, so I’m holding hope they had a very good reason why not. #karenread #freekarenread

Just Larry

298,674 次观看 • 2 年前

The proposed indefinite stay-away by Zimbabwe’s war veterans’ leader Blessed “Bombshell” Geza has failed to take off. Zimbabweans, particularly in Bulawayo and Harare and other small towns, chose to go to work today. I see on social media that some citizens in the diaspora are angry with fellow compatriots back home for going to work, but we should remember that Zimbabwe has 95% unemployment, so if people do not go out to hustle, they will starve, so goes the argument. The idea that people would get food from retailers or wholesalers was Alice in Wonderland stuff, it was never going to work or happen in a country where most businesses are owned by the corrupt cabal that the action intended to remove or loosen its grip on power. Secondly, Zimbabweans want to be liberated from corrupt rule by a particular type of political group and politician, so without the traditional opposition throwing its weight behind Geza's call, his efforts were always going to be in vain even though they are noble and progressive. The failure of this stay-away ends any immediate hope that citizens will participate in any liberation efforts unless mobilised by the traditional opposition, which does not exist, or by the military. I will be blunt. Short of a military intervention to stop Emmerson Mnangagwa’s corrupt rule, he will now get everything he wants, including term extensions. He is relentless. Zimbabweans will now be stuck with Mnangagwa until the day he dies and possibly will have to accept that his kids will rule them too with the assistance of his crooked cronies and clansmen. Zimbabweans should forget about the 2028 election and as a local doctor mentioned on social media, begin working through the five stages of grief: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance. It is pointless putting your hopes in a process that you know too well will be rigged. For him to fail to achieve what he wants, Mnangagwa would have to make a catastrophic mistake, like killing loads of people which will attract international scrutiny or firing his Vice President, General Constantino Chiwenga which might finally trigger a decisive response. There is now nobody with the capacity to stop him, short of a military intervention or death. Geza has tried, but there is no tangible citizen support that was forthcoming. Geza managed to force Mnangagwa’s team to stop chanting the 2030 slogan and pushed them into another plan of bribing MPs with illegally parcelled land. But after today, the dictator knows that Geza is now all alone, unless the military intervenes, which, as I have said before, is now looking highly unlikely unless they are provoked by the continued conspicuous consumption of looted public funds. So, Zimbabweans must now accept the reality that their failure to sacrifice for their liberation by simply staying at home will mean more unemployment, more looting of public funds, more dilapidated hospitals and public infrastructure, and more economic pain all around. Those are the grim political and socio-economic realities of Zimbabwe going forward, nothing less, nothing more. Journalists will continue writing about corruption scandals, but only for historical records and as part of our job, and for many readers, it would be for entertainment value sadly. Some will just switch to issues that have positive mental health outcomes. If you are young, have a passport, and have somewhere to go, my advice is to leave, otherwise, you will just become another tragic statistic of poverty, unemployment, and possibly death in a derelict hospital. Ordinarily, Africans do not care about who is in power if they have the basic necessities of life. But sadly, in Zimbabwe, those necessities will remain out of reach for as long as Mnangagwa and his corrupt cabal are in power. As for the opposition, it is dead. There will be no pushback for reasons you all know. You will remember that last year in May, I mentioned that three key countries to Zimbabwe's politics privately mentioned through their diplomats that, as far as they were concerned, 2028 was gone, and they were now looking at perhaps 2033 or even beyond to envisage any possibility of a change of government. But as long as Zimbabweans remain fixated on the main actor syndrome and not an opposition movement, they must also accept being stuck in the current political ditch for a long time to come. What does this mean? It means more looting. For the diaspora, it means continuing to send money back home for the foreseeable future. The tragedy is that Zimbabwean citizens continue to look for a hero figure rather than building a durable, collective movement that outlasts individual egos. Until that changes, power will remain concentrated in the hands of whoever seizes the moment, no matter how corrupt or undemocratic they are like Mnangagwa. For foreign diplomats, it simply means accepting that they now must work with the government of the day no matter how corrupt it is, with no hope of any change unless there is a dramatic intervention that puts an end to the current political rot. For General Constantino Chiwenga, it means kissing goodbye to his dream of becoming president. He must now tighten his security and pray that Mnangagwa does not make the un-strategic mistake of firing him because he might not be able to fight back. If he still has an appetite for this job, he has to fight for it by coming out of the shadows, otherwise he will meet the same fate that destroyed Joice Mujuru’s career. Without her husband, she became a nobody, and without the military, Chiwenga will be just another brick in the wall. For 74-year-old war veterans’ leader, former intelligence officer, and former Member of Parliament Blessed “Bombshell” Geza, keep your head up high old man. You did what you could, and history will be kind to you for trying, at great personal cost. Your beautiful home in Sanyati was burnt, your wife harassed, and now you are living in hiding. One would have to be a fool of monumental proportions not to acknowledge your efforts and say thank you for trying. You have contributed to people’s consciousness about how bad corruption has become, and hopefully you will live to see the change that Zimbabwe so desperately needs. Every struggle needs leadership; people cannot lead themselves. The idea that the Arab Spring was leaderless is rooted in ignorance and a lack of understanding of what happened. Without leaders to provide direction and inspiration, citizens cannot move forward on their own. Citizens were given direction and inspiration by Geza, but quite evidently, they felt it was not enough to compel them to make sacrifices, such as simply staying away from work and enduring a little hardship for the greater good and a better future. The dysfunctionality of national leadership in Zimbabwe has been fuelled by money changing hands, shameless ethnic alignments, corruption, and the absence of a shared national vision and values. Put simply, Zimbabweans are not united against the common enemy, corrupt rule. The oversized egos that prioritise individualism over a collective agenda are self-evident, and they are among the key ingredients of today’s failed politics. Sadly, it is the ordinary people and the lumpen who cheer that individualism that will continue to suffer. As Dr Solomon Guramatunhu has always said in my favourite saying of his, politicians are a mirror of who we are as a society. Every society has a leadership it deserves. When the society fundamentally changes, it will change its leadership too. When citizens hero-worship politicians regardless of the mistakes they make, it means such a people deserve those leaders. When citizens demand more, the leaders will also change. For now, Zimbabweans are stuck with Mnangagwa and an elusive opposition that only exists in name and not indeed. I conclude by saying that only something very dramatic will change Zimbabwe’s state of affairs. It could be a military intervention that removes the current corrupt political leadership of Mnangagwa, but ultimately it will also serve the interests of the elites if the citizens are just by-standers, or a dramatic fall from grace for the corrupt if a few of them are arrested beyond the president’s control, leading to the public shedding its fear. At this moment, any change will do, because the country was removed from the gutter in 2017 into the sewer. The question is who has the capacity to bring the required change? Only time will tell.

Hopewell Chin’ono

121,223 次观看 • 1 年前

Secrets of the United States according to artificial intelligence These are a little too accurate: 1) The economy is not broken. It was designed this way. Every time the economy crashes or wealth inequality gets worse. People say that the system is failing, but the truth is that it's working exactly as it's intended. The US economic system was built to funnel wealth upwards while keeping everyday people in a cycle of debt dependence and financial insecurity. The cost of living isn't skyrocketing because of a mistake. It's keeping people struggling because it makes them easier to exploit 2) Division is the oldest trick in the book. The biggest illusion in the US right now is that the real fight is left versus right when in reality it is the powerful versus the rest of us. Politicians, corporations and media outlets fuel division because the population that a population that is angry at each other is too distracted to hold those in power accountable. Racism, class warfare and political polarization aren't just unfortunate side effects of society. They're intentionally kept alive because they keep people from uniting against those truly hoarding wealth and power. 3) Censorship isn't always obvious. While many people think of censorship as governments banning books or blocking websites, modern censorship is far more subtle and it looks like flooding the internet with noise to bury real information, silencing independent journalists through demonetization or blacklisting, using misinformation labels selectively to discredit dissenting voices even when they're asking valid questions, encouraging self-censorship by making people fear, social or professional consequences for speaking out. The goal isn't to remove the information. It's often to make it so hard to find or so socially risky to discuss that people just stop looking 4) War is about power and resources. Anytime a new conflict arises, the media presents it as a moral battle, but the reality is that wars are almost always control about control over resources, economic power and strategic influence, whether it's oil, mineral trade, routes or minerals, trade routes or ideological dominance. This part is in bold. Nations don't send people to die for freedom. They do it for money and control. The US military industrial complex profits from constant conflict, which is why endless wars and foreign interventions never stop 5) If the government wanted to solve major problems it already would have, whether it's homelessness, healthcare, wealth inequality, or environmental destruction. The truth is that these problems exist. Because keeping them unsolved benefits those in power. A sick, poor, and desperate population is easier to control, manipulate and profit from the idea that change is impossible is a lie. There is simply no incentive for the people in charge to change it 6) Probably the most important, you have more power than you think. The biggest secret of all regular people in bold are the greatest threat to the system. The reason powerful people, the powerful keep people divided, struggling, and distracted is because if enough people woke up again in bold, things would change overnight. Throughout history, real change has only ever come from people refusing to accept the status quo, not from politicians or corporations suddenly growing a conscience “The question is, what will people do with this? Knowledge? Awareness is the first step, but action, especially collective action is what forces real change — I hope you know that we are more powerful united and you are more powerful than you think”

Wall Street Apes

131,752 次观看 • 1 年前

𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐃𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐬: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐨 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐚 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐋𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐀𝐮𝐱𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚 𝐌𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐰𝐚 The audio saga linking Zimbabwe's main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa to First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa through her aide Ben Muneri - which has been verified by The NewsHawks beyond reasonable doubt - has further shown that politics is not just what happens in the public sphere, but mostly importantly behind the scenes. While public theatre dominates politics, important decisions are made behind doors, away from the public domain. Supporters of political parties and their leaders are usually left in the dark, and when they discover what has been happening they react with shock, denial and some by being aggressively defensive even when indisputable facts have been placed before them. The backstage environment and manoeuvres allow for genuine negotiation, compromise, and building of trust between opposing sides, away from public scrutiny, which can be essential for making progress on complex issues, yet dangerous as it can lead to cutting personal deals for self-aggrandisement and selling out. Significant deals are often struck in confidential settings, reducing the impact of political theatre and media sensationalism. Lobbyists and mediators often operate in the shadows to influence policy and cut deals without public disclosure. Private meetings are used by politicians to negotiate without fear of backlash from voters or other constituents, allowing for compromises that would be politically fatal in public. Closed-door bargaining allows politicians to engage in dialogue without facing reputational damage if a deal falls through. When not performing for an audience, politicians are more open to practical solutions and concessions. Zimbabwe has had several such arrangements, including four important Governments of National Unity (GNU), including the 1978 Internal Settlement, the 1980 GNU, the 1987 Unity Accord and the 2009-2013 GNU. Relationships between leaders, crucial for long-term policy, are nurtured through confidential, amicable, and trust-building interactions. While democracy primarily aims for transparency, the practical, often messy, processes of negotiation and power-brokering create a strong incentive for politicians to keep key political activity hidden from the public view. The Zimbabwean political landscape, for instance, is often defined by a stark public dichotomy between ruling party Zanu PF and the main opposition, characterised by intense public rivalry and violent repression. However, the emergence of a secretly recorded audio involving Chamisa and Muneri shows a far more complex reality of backroom lines of communication and secret negotiations, bridging the divide after the disputed 2018 and 2023 presidential elections. This situation further explains the capture and deals after the 2023 elections. This saga, which surfaced with recordings of conversations following a social media tiff between political activists Jealousy Mawarire, who is highly critical of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and his 2030 Agenda, and Brighton Mutebuka, a Chamisa loyalist, highlighted backdoor attempts at political maneuvring that stood in contrast to the public rhetoric of a stolen elections. The Secret Negotiations Exposed The audio recordings, which began circulating after the secret talks in 2021 and 2022, featured a conversation between Chamisa, then leading the MDC Alliance, and Muneri, an aide tasked with handling politucal and business interests for First Lady. The context of these discussions was the intense post-2018 election period, marked by brutal violence and killings on August 1, as well as a failed court challenge of the result by Chamisa. The audio shows Chamisa was not merely engaging in public resistance but in secret moves to engage with Mnangagwa, seeking to negotiate a personal deal to become prime minister rather than a broad coalition.

TheNewsHawks

52,502 次观看 • 6 个月前

One of the statements Peter Obi often makes whenever we find ourselves in difficult moments on this journey to reclaim our country is: “If death wants to come tomorrow, I want it to come today.” I am yet to see anyone who is comfortable in every currency, respected far beyond his geographical location, and still willing to put everything on the line simply because he believes in his country and cannot stand by and watch it go down the drain. So when he said, “Yes, I am ready to die for Nigeria,” it wasn’t a politically correct answer. It wasn’t rhetoric. It was a reflection of a level of patriotism rarely seen among people of his social, political, and economic standing. Peter Obi is prepared to fight for the soul of this country, whatever the cost. And make no mistake, he has borne the consequences of that commitment. From attacks on his businesses and those associated with him, to threats against his person; from properties being targeted or revoked, to his trips being frustrated even when undertaken for personal reasons; from allegations of his international passport being cloned, to friends and churches being pressured to distance themselves from him; from schools being discouraged from accepting his support or even allowing him speak at their events, to countless sponsored smear campaigns, amongst others Yet, none of these have deterred him from his quest to see a Nigeria that works for Nigerians. The bigger question is: Can we be focused and resilient enough to join hands with Peter Obi in this struggle for a new Nigeria? Can we remain united by a shared sense of purpose and refuse to allow greed, religion, tribal sentiments, personal interests, or ego to come between us? Because if we can, then perhaps the Nigeria we dream of is not as far away as it seems.

Esther Umoh

44,593 次观看 • 3 个月前

Push for net zero is 'meaningless': Friends of Science president Ron Davison Even if accomplished, the push for net zero would achieve a miniscule 0.7 degrees reduction in temperature, Davison asserts. When it comes to pushing back against hysteria over climate change, few do it better than the Friends of Science. The organization says the societal and policy focus on climate change and carbon dioxide is misguided, suggesting instead that climate fluctuations are driven more by natural phenomena — cycles and influences, ocean cycles, and naturally changing atmospheric oscillations. And while humans do contribute to climate change, we adapt and innovate to these changing patterns, an approach Friends of Science advocates for in contrast to the government's push for low-carbon policies and taxes. Rebel News caught up with Ron Davison, president of Friends of Science, at the Global Energy Show in Calgary, where we spoke to him about the issues surrounding this contentious topic. The key questions regarding climate change are “what the magnitude of the change is and why the change is” happening, he says. With focus heavily on CO2, Davison says his position is “that we should have more CO2 going out into the atmosphere, as long as it's just CO2 and water.” Other chemicals going along with it, that's a danger, he adds. Even if accomplished, the push for net zero would achieve a miniscule 0.7 degrees reduction in temperature, Davison asserts. “You can't measure it, it's meaningless,” he tells Rebel News. “Ultimately, we need the oil and gas industry — and coal too, it'd be great, we don't have it anymore. But if it's clean emissions, it benefits everyone.” As activists continue to drum up alarm and attempt to shut down industries crucial to Canada's economy, Davison points to a book published by Friends of Science called Energy and Climate at a Glance. “It takes a lot of the points on energy and climate and distills them down to a couple of sentences, but with the technical backup to a link with a 100, 200, 300-page report from reputable institutions.” Prime Minister Mark Carney's government has thrown “a lot of nice words” around, Davison says, but he remains skeptical about any major changes from Carney's Liberal government compared to Justin Trudeau. “We need energy. And that includes renewable, geothermal — whatever, where it makes economic sense,” he says. “We just should not be having this energy transition forced upon us when we can't afford us and it's not going to make any difference in the end to the temperature.”

Rebel News

13,009 次观看 • 1 年前