正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

JUST IN: LEGENDARY STANFORD CRYPTOGRAPHER DAN BONEH JUST SAID ANYONE WHO THINKS QUANTUM WILL DESTROY #BITCOIN IS "INSANE" "IF YOU THINK QUANTUM IS GOING TO AFFECT THE SECURITY OF BLOCKCHAINS, YOU'RE WRONG" "WE JUST NEED TO MOVE TO POST-QUANTUM ADDRESSES." "WE KNOW WHERE TO GO." "THERE ARE ALL SMALL...

102,493 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

John W. Ratcliff 的头像
John W. Ratcliff1 个月前

"just" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence...

Mr Vinyl 的头像
Mr Vinyl1 个月前

We know where to go but we are not moving.

Alex Pruden 的头像
Alex Pruden1 个月前

Completely right. It won't kill Bitcoin the technology. But the value of Bitcoin the application could absolutely be impacted by a chaotic migration to PQC. Far more on the line than anything related to BIP-110

konflictofinterests 的头像
konflictofinterests1 个月前

Yeah let's see the *plan* not the theory

Clever Crypto 的头像
Clever Crypto1 个月前

Its a bunch of noise, BTC will be fine. Normal banks and investments firms have a ton more to worry about.

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️ 的头像
Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️1 个月前

FULL EPISODE with DAN BONEH:

Michczy 的头像
Michczy1 个月前

Be ready for quantum

泰坦链 | DeFi 的头像
泰坦链 | DeFi1 个月前

The hard part is migrating

DaPangDun 的头像
DaPangDun1 个月前

你知道吗?现在还有一些BTC的老OG觉得量子威胁不存在

8dg 的头像
8dg1 个月前

Lattice-based cryptography

Mysteryripple 的头像
Mysteryripple1 个月前

Worth pairing this with what actually happened three weeks ago. On July 30, 594 bitcoin left about 500 wallets in 25 minutes. Not quantum. Certain Coldcard firmware had silently fallen back from the hardware RNG to a software pseudo-random generator while creating seeds, collapsing the search space from 128 bits to roughly 40. Post-quantum addresses would not have saved those wallets. Dice entropy, a passphrase, or multisig did. The migration is the right project. It just isn't the nearest failure mode.

ruben 的头像
ruben1 个月前

Banks should be more worried about it .🤔

JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! 的头像
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零!1 个月前

Prof. Boneh was a little bit wrong!

Achim Mueller 的头像
Achim Mueller1 个月前

Wow. Thanks to Dan Boneh for that. website closed: the winner could break a 15 bit ECC key on a 133 QBit hardware. Bitcoin uses 256 Bit ECC keys for its cyptography. Google recently made claims they need 1000 QBits to break Bitcoin cyptography.

bitcoinearly 的头像
bitcoinearly1 个月前

$NAT is currently solving the more pressing bitcoin problem as a secondary subsidy protecting Bitcoin. Please do check us out @natgmi and see what we are talking about.

Pennywise XBT OGHodler - d0xC 的头像
Pennywise XBT OGHodler - d0xC1 个月前

#IYKYK

🧠 Fred | PocketIQ | Free AI Trading 的头像
🧠 Fred | PocketIQ | Free AI Trading1 个月前

🔼 Time is money.

SwissNode 的头像
SwissNode1 个月前

That solves the caps lock problem however 😏

G Thomas Kerr 的头像
G Thomas Kerr1 个月前

While it’s the new Y2K, we spent billions preventing that one from causing widespread fallout. Bitcoin devs must do the same.

Robert Nass 的头像
Robert Nass1 个月前

Strong take

Quantus 的头像
Quantus1 个月前

Yes, but the moving part is what is difficult. You need hundreds of thousands of people from all over the world to migrate at the same time. The narrative of "but we will solve it" is the delay that will cause the prolonging of the attack surface to be visible.

R&D Optimistic 的头像
R&D Optimistic1 个月前

@iamdaveparker We need this FUD to last longer pls - what will left to say otherwise 😂😂

銀蔵さん 的头像
銀蔵さん1 个月前

ロストコインも休眠ウォレットもどうするかは言ってないよね?

The Bitcoin Historian 的头像
The Bitcoin Historian1 个月前

WATCH: @Ethan_Heilman on why quantum is coming "this decade" and what it means for #Bitcoin 🔥

AdaptiveAlph 郝名阿 的头像
AdaptiveAlph 郝名阿1 个月前

@Regooks “Anyone who is worried about quantum effecting blockchains is insane” Bitcoin network is not encrypted.. only wallets are… Not sure if he confused about it or just unclear

Ted Trading Club 的头像
Ted Trading Club1 个月前

Good to see a sober take

Richard | ISC 的头像
Richard | ISC1 个月前

You dont need a cryptographer to answer this. You need a politician. We arent short of solutions. We are short of consensus. No solution will be implemented that protect all BTC before its too late.

jeff1234 的头像
jeff12341 个月前

這種專家只會出一張嘴,理論說的天花亂墜,現實呢?他有實際硬體實現了什麼 ?

yp0c5t 的头像
yp0c5t1 个月前

"we just" -- there you go.

jeff1234 的头像
jeff12341 个月前

請問現實量子他懂多少,AI都還剛開始能用,量子世界是人累科技的最終研究,量子世界太難

卖飞哥 🐊(互 F 🤝 学习) 的头像
卖飞哥 🐊(互 F 🤝 学习)1 个月前

量子威胁更像升级路线的问题,地址迁移和协议治理做好,安全性就有修复空间。

HighLow 的头像
HighLow1 个月前

buy zcash man to end your agony

The Crypto Compass 的头像
The Crypto Compass1 个月前

The quantum panic always skips the boring part: address formats can be upgraded the same way TLS versions get upgraded. Nobody panics when their browser silently switches ciphers.

Aldaron 的头像
Aldaron1 个月前

Those who doubt will be left behind. Just as history has shown.

猴哥 的头像
猴哥1 个月前

GM

相关视频

BITCOIN RAILS EPISODE #18: MAKE BITCOIN QUANTUM RESISTANT | with BIP360 author Hunter Beast Hunter Beast 🕯️ Quantum computing is a complicated topic—one that incites equal amounts of fear and skepticism depending on who you talk to… especially in Bitcoin. In this episode, BIP360 author Hunter Beast wisely shares why the “truth is likely somewhere in the middle,” citing incremental advancements in quantum computing that may eventually pose a legitimate threat to some Bitcoin addresses—as well as steps we can take to protect ourselves in the short, medium and long term. The correct posture is to “be prepared, not scared,” says Hunter Beast 🕯️ Ultimately, the introduction of quantum resistant cryptography—via proposals like BIP360—will be needed for higher degrees of security. That said, individuals can mitigate personal risk substantially through proper address-use hygiene. This episode breaks down the specific challenges Bitcoin will face in the event of a quantum attack, the likelihood of an attack over time, and the steps we’ll need to take at the individual and communal level to ensure Bitcoin’s safety. This episode includes detailed discussion of: 1) How quantum computing could potentially affect Bitcoin public/private key cryptography—and technologies built on vulnerable addresses (e.g. Taproot) 2) Best practices for protecting yourself against quantum in the short and long term 3) Implications of vulnerable address types—e.g. what about Satoshi’s coins? 4) Deep Dive into BIP360 + proposed long-term solutions 5) Industry roadmaps for quantum computing + how banks and governments are preparing for “Q Day” As always, this episode can be viewed on Spotify or YouTuve—full episode in the comments or linktree in my bio. This episode is powered by Best In Slot—the leading API for Ordinals and BRC20 data aggregation and indexing. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 02:05 What is quantum computing? 04:30 How could quantum threaten your Bitcoin wallet? 06:50 Addresses that are safe from quantum 09:13 Satoshi’s coins are in danger! 11:25 What happens if Satoshi’s coins are touched? 14:45 Do we softfork to shield Satoshi’s coins? 16:38 “Transitory inflation” for bitcoin after quantum 21:05 Why Taproot addresses are vulnerable 23:50 Do NOT reuse your Bitcoin addresses! 26:03 When will Quantum become a threat? 28:34 The long/short exposure attack; explained 31:45 Protection using private mempools 33:20 Why all the new Bitcoin L2s are in danger 37:45 Quantum is 5 to 10 years away, governments fear 40:34 Non-Bitcoin systems threatened by quantum 42:26 Centralized systems can adapt to quantum 43:50 Hunter’s BIP: Post quantum cryptography in Bitcoin 47:40 Hunter’s three new signature algorithms 53:48 Is new cryptography on Bitcoin risky? 56:33 Why not just stick to hash-based cryptography? 58:49 A 16X discount for quantum resistant addresses? 01:02:30 Creating quantum resistant multisig addresses 01:04:00 What is Frost? 01:06:50 The long process of approving a BIP 01:08:30 What developers think of Hunter’s BIP 01:10:00 Matt Corallo’s concerns with Hunter’s approach 01:11:00 Steps to implementing the BIP 360 01:17:00 Where to learn more about BIP 360 01:17:50 Who can push the button to change Bitcoin?

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

31,148 次观看 • 1 年前