Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

just started sucking that uncut monster🍆on a public beach gets a load💦in the throat #cuminthroat #uncutcock #hugeuncutcock #hugecock #uncutmonstercock #girth #hugecockbeach #girthypenis #girthydick #bwc #bigwhitecock #beachcock #beachblowjob #monsterwhitecock #monstercock #cum

📹daddyhuge2198📼

99,419 subscribers

70,387 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #cuminthroat #uncutcock #hugeuncutcock #hugecock #uncutmonstercock #girth #hugecockbeach #girthypenis #girthydick #bwc #bigwhitecock #beachcock #beachblowjob #monsterwhitecock #monstercock #cum

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Larry Ellison did an impression of a journalist. It was more devastating than anything they have ever written about him. For years the press ran the same line about his friend. Elon does not know what he is doing. Ellison got tired of hearing it, so he started doing the voice. Ellison: “Elon doesn’t know what he’s doing. He’ll have to go ask for money. I’m really smart, I work for the Wall Street Journal.” That is the entire profession in one sentence. No product. No payroll. No risk. Just a badge and a deadline. Ellison: “Who are you? This guy’s landing rockets on robot drone rafts in the ocean, and you’re saying he doesn’t know what he’s doing. You ever land a rocket?” Nobody in that business has an answer to that question. Nobody has ever had one. Ellison: “Why should I believe you, as opposed to my friend Elon, when we’re out here watching this rocket land, and you’re in front of your Apple Macintosh saying Elon’s an idiot?” The entire currency of that industry is borrowed authority. Say it with confidence. Attach a byline. Never once answer for the outcome. An engineer gets a scoreboard. A trader gets margin called. A journalist gets a correction nobody reads, printed under a story nobody remembers. SpaceX has landed the same booster 35 times. Same hardware. Same physics. Checked in public every single time, with nowhere to hide if it fails. For decades a handful of networks and newspapers got to decide what counted as true. Ellison just proved they never had a monopoly on being right. Only a monopoly on being heard. That monopoly is gone. He is still landing rockets. Nobody remembers their names.

Larry Ellison did an impression of a journalist. It was more devastating than anything they have ever written about him. For years the press ran the same line about his friend. Elon does not know what he is doing. Ellison got tired of hearing it, so he started doing the voice. Ellison: “Elon doesn’t know what he’s doing. He’ll have to go ask for money. I’m really smart, I work for the Wall Street Journal.” That is the entire profession in one sentence. No product. No payroll. No risk. Just a badge and a deadline. Ellison: “Who are you? This guy’s landing rockets on robot drone rafts in the ocean, and you’re saying he doesn’t know what he’s doing. You ever land a rocket?” Nobody in that business has an answer to that question. Nobody has ever had one. Ellison: “Why should I believe you, as opposed to my friend Elon, when we’re out here watching this rocket land, and you’re in front of your Apple Macintosh saying Elon’s an idiot?” The entire currency of that industry is borrowed authority. Say it with confidence. Attach a byline. Never once answer for the outcome. An engineer gets a scoreboard. A trader gets margin called. A journalist gets a correction nobody reads, printed under a story nobody remembers. SpaceX has landed the same booster 35 times. Same hardware. Same physics. Checked in public every single time, with nowhere to hide if it fails. For decades a handful of networks and newspapers got to decide what counted as true. Ellison just proved they never had a monopoly on being right. Only a monopoly on being heard. That monopoly is gone. He is still landing rockets. Nobody remembers their names.

Dustin

29,253 views • 1 month ago

“Here we are, six years after the coronavirus outbreak, and we still don’t know for sure how it started. Which is kind of important, because if we don’t know how it started, we can’t really know how to prevent the next one. And for a lot of reasons, that issue got completely politicized over the last six years. And this hearing didn’t help in that regard. It’s Kabuki. It’s a show. On both sides, actually… It’s a lot of heat and no light.” “When it comes to Fauci, in any normal situation, you could say, well, if he’s got nothing to hide, he could just talk. But we’re not in a normal environment. We’re in an environment where the Justice Department indicted Comey for an Instagram post on the beach. Fauci has a pardon, it’s not a future pardon. He doesn’t have immunity. If Rand Paul really wanted answers, he could give him immunity, but he didn’t do that. So, knowing that he could be indicted for almost anything in this era, I completely understand why he took the fifth.” “There’s a lot of evidence that Fauci seriously considered the lab leak theory, in private. But he and his friends, in public, always poo-pooed it and talked it down… There’s a ton of U.S. government information that we still have not seen. And that’s the information that led the FBI, the Department of Energy, and more recently the CIA to conclude that there’s a preponderance of evidence, not proof, but more evidence than not that the bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was somehow related to the bat coronavirus labs in Wuhan.” “There’s a lot of research that American and Chinese researchers were doing in Wuhan on making bat coronaviruses more dangerous. You can call it Gain of Function or not, it doesn’t matter what you call it… The idea was to figure out how viruses might evolve so that we could prevent them. But if the viruses broke out of the lab, then we actually caused the pandemic, which is a tough thing to wrap your head around.” “This was government-sponsored research by scientists in America and China who were trying to do the right thing. They weren’t trying to start a pandemic. But they may have started a pandemic. And the fact that this is politicized means we can’t get to those answers. But those answers are still there. Something happened in Wuhan. We need to figure out what it was, so we can prevent the next pandemic.” Watch my entire segment about the Rand-Fauci hearing battle with Boris Sanchez on CNN News Central.

“Here we are, six years after the coronavirus outbreak, and we still don’t know for sure how it started. Which is kind of important, because if we don’t know how it started, we can’t really know how to prevent the next one. And for a lot of reasons, that issue got completely politicized over the last six years. And this hearing didn’t help in that regard. It’s Kabuki. It’s a show. On both sides, actually… It’s a lot of heat and no light.” “When it comes to Fauci, in any normal situation, you could say, well, if he’s got nothing to hide, he could just talk. But we’re not in a normal environment. We’re in an environment where the Justice Department indicted Comey for an Instagram post on the beach. Fauci has a pardon, it’s not a future pardon. He doesn’t have immunity. If Rand Paul really wanted answers, he could give him immunity, but he didn’t do that. So, knowing that he could be indicted for almost anything in this era, I completely understand why he took the fifth.” “There’s a lot of evidence that Fauci seriously considered the lab leak theory, in private. But he and his friends, in public, always poo-pooed it and talked it down… There’s a ton of U.S. government information that we still have not seen. And that’s the information that led the FBI, the Department of Energy, and more recently the CIA to conclude that there’s a preponderance of evidence, not proof, but more evidence than not that the bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was somehow related to the bat coronavirus labs in Wuhan.” “There’s a lot of research that American and Chinese researchers were doing in Wuhan on making bat coronaviruses more dangerous. You can call it Gain of Function or not, it doesn’t matter what you call it… The idea was to figure out how viruses might evolve so that we could prevent them. But if the viruses broke out of the lab, then we actually caused the pandemic, which is a tough thing to wrap your head around.” “This was government-sponsored research by scientists in America and China who were trying to do the right thing. They weren’t trying to start a pandemic. But they may have started a pandemic. And the fact that this is politicized means we can’t get to those answers. But those answers are still there. Something happened in Wuhan. We need to figure out what it was, so we can prevent the next pandemic.” Watch my entire segment about the Rand-Fauci hearing battle with Boris Sanchez on CNN News Central.

Josh Rogin

63,518 views • 29 days ago

⚠️DOOMSDAY FISH JUST WASHED UP... WHAT ARE THEY WARNING US ABOUT? A "doomsday" fish just washed up on the beach in Tasmania… and people are freaking out. They call it the oarfish, a massive, deep-sea creature that lives over 1,600 feet underwater. It never comes near humans… unless something’s seriously wrong. And here’s where it gets spooky: In Japanese legend, oarfish only surface when a major disaster is coming...earthquakes, tsunamis, even mass death events. Before the 2011 Japan tsunami, dozens of these things started showing up. And now? Boom. Another one just hits land in Australia. Scientists say it’s probably just sick. But if these creatures “never show up”… how did ancient cultures even know they exist? How did they create mythology around them… if they’re never seen? Are we really supposed to believe it’s all coincidence? Because here’s what people aren’t saying: These oarfish don’t just appear. They warn. So when one shows up...you’d better look around and ask… What the hell is about to happen?

⚠️DOOMSDAY FISH JUST WASHED UP... WHAT ARE THEY WARNING US ABOUT? A "doomsday" fish just washed up on the beach in Tasmania… and people are freaking out. They call it the oarfish, a massive, deep-sea creature that lives over 1,600 feet underwater. It never comes near humans… unless something’s seriously wrong. And here’s where it gets spooky: In Japanese legend, oarfish only surface when a major disaster is coming...earthquakes, tsunamis, even mass death events. Before the 2011 Japan tsunami, dozens of these things started showing up. And now? Boom. Another one just hits land in Australia. Scientists say it’s probably just sick. But if these creatures “never show up”… how did ancient cultures even know they exist? How did they create mythology around them… if they’re never seen? Are we really supposed to believe it’s all coincidence? Because here’s what people aren’t saying: These oarfish don’t just appear. They warn. So when one shows up...you’d better look around and ask… What the hell is about to happen?

HustleBitch

14,236 views • 1 year ago

AAS WITH STREET UNION #StreetUnionXAuauSave together for almost 2 years but auau still gets possesive and jealous 😭 👤: is it true that auau is the one gets possessive/jelaous more easily ? * 🦋🐱 both answered ✅* 🐱: this is a true story! 🦋: there is even digital footprint— 🐱: even if there was no digital footprint there are still many many examples 🦋: like uncut version 🐱: not uncut! like for example we went to work right and we were taking gen 4 pictures 🐱: it was a group photo okay— and you know there is this one person in gen 4 (🐉) 🐱: and that person like— he came and just stood next to me and he (🦋) started like “nggh” *like sulking and sad* 🐱: he was unhappy like *again doing the action* 🐱: okay— lets take the picture again— finish taking it lets reshoot it of us standing together instead ~ 🦋: this one i wont argue on— this is actually a true story 🐱: you see that! this is a true story and there are many many more 🦋: that day i felt the steam coming out of my ears *cause he was angry* 👤: really? 🦋: no no— no steam coming out

AAS WITH STREET UNION #StreetUnionXAuauSave together for almost 2 years but auau still gets possesive and jealous 😭 👤: is it true that auau is the one gets possessive/jelaous more easily ? * 🦋🐱 both answered ✅* 🐱: this is a true story! 🦋: there is even digital footprint— 🐱: even if there was no digital footprint there are still many many examples 🦋: like uncut version 🐱: not uncut! like for example we went to work right and we were taking gen 4 pictures 🐱: it was a group photo okay— and you know there is this one person in gen 4 (🐉) 🐱: and that person like— he came and just stood next to me and he (🦋) started like “nggh” like sulking and sad 🐱: he was unhappy like again doing the action 🐱: okay— lets take the picture again— finish taking it lets reshoot it of us standing together instead ~ 🦋: this one i wont argue on— this is actually a true story 🐱: you see that! this is a true story and there are many many more 🦋: that day i felt the steam coming out of my ears cause he was angry 👤: really? 🦋: no no— no steam coming out

kash‎ #thirdwan !

12,982 views • 28 days ago

Itchy trigger finger cops get schooled. All 8 of them had to do that walk of shame. A tense standoff highlights a critical dynamic in law enforcement: the power of a knowledgeable supervisor to prevent a massive civil rights lawsuit. While the interaction started with intimidation and legal misinformation, it ended up being a masterclass in how police supervisors should handle citizens who know their rights. A journalist—lawfully filming in public while open-carrying a holstered handgun outside the Henderson County Sheriff's Office get surrounded by 8 deputies all worried about a guy with a camera. One of the deputies seems to have an itchy trigger finger by the name of Detective Williams gets challenged by the journalist on his defensive posture. Williams is standing with his hand resting on his firearm, his security hood completely deactivated. When questioned, Williams claims he's doing it for his safety and "because I can." The journalist stands his ground, pointing out that preparing a weapon's unholstering mechanics without an active threat serves as an implicit, lethal threat to a peaceful citizen. As backup arrives, the situation deteriorates into a classic display of "authority by default." Multiple deputies try to bully the journalist into compliance by confidently claiming that the parking lot is restricted because it is "county property." The journalist doesn't flinch. He holds his ground and educates the deputies on a vital legal distinction: while the lot is county-owned, it is a taxpayer-funded, public-use space. He openly acknowledges that carrying a weapon inside the government building is illegal, but correctly notes that the exterior parking lot remains public domain. The deputies look visibly uncomfortable, caught off guard by a citizen who refuses to be intimidated. The entire trajectory of the encounter shifts the moment unit supervisor Corey Payne enters the frame. Instead of backing up his deputies' bad legal takes, Payne takes a rare, commendable approach: Admitting the Law: Supervisor Payne explicitly concedes that the parking lot is public property and that open carry is 100% legal under state law. The Voice of Reason: While Payne defends his team's response—explaining that walking a government lot with a firearm and a camera is highly "abnormal" behavior that naturally prompts a public safety check—he completely validates the journalist's right to be there. When Payne asks for the journalist's name to document the contact, the journalist politely declines, asserting he has broken no laws and identifying only as a "good citizen." Because Supervisor Payne actually knows the law, he recognizes a legal stalemate when he sees one. He understands that the journalist is fully within his rights to open carry, film, and refuse identification without reasonable suspicion of a crime. Rather than letting his deputies violate a citizen's rights, Payne shuts down the interaction, commands his team to leave, and walks away. This supervisor likely saved his county thousands of dollars in legal fees just by respecting the Constitution. The walk of shame is in effect at the end as it should be.

Itchy trigger finger cops get schooled. All 8 of them had to do that walk of shame. A tense standoff highlights a critical dynamic in law enforcement: the power of a knowledgeable supervisor to prevent a massive civil rights lawsuit. While the interaction started with intimidation and legal misinformation, it ended up being a masterclass in how police supervisors should handle citizens who know their rights. A journalist—lawfully filming in public while open-carrying a holstered handgun outside the Henderson County Sheriff's Office get surrounded by 8 deputies all worried about a guy with a camera. One of the deputies seems to have an itchy trigger finger by the name of Detective Williams gets challenged by the journalist on his defensive posture. Williams is standing with his hand resting on his firearm, his security hood completely deactivated. When questioned, Williams claims he's doing it for his safety and "because I can." The journalist stands his ground, pointing out that preparing a weapon's unholstering mechanics without an active threat serves as an implicit, lethal threat to a peaceful citizen. As backup arrives, the situation deteriorates into a classic display of "authority by default." Multiple deputies try to bully the journalist into compliance by confidently claiming that the parking lot is restricted because it is "county property." The journalist doesn't flinch. He holds his ground and educates the deputies on a vital legal distinction: while the lot is county-owned, it is a taxpayer-funded, public-use space. He openly acknowledges that carrying a weapon inside the government building is illegal, but correctly notes that the exterior parking lot remains public domain. The deputies look visibly uncomfortable, caught off guard by a citizen who refuses to be intimidated. The entire trajectory of the encounter shifts the moment unit supervisor Corey Payne enters the frame. Instead of backing up his deputies' bad legal takes, Payne takes a rare, commendable approach: Admitting the Law: Supervisor Payne explicitly concedes that the parking lot is public property and that open carry is 100% legal under state law. The Voice of Reason: While Payne defends his team's response—explaining that walking a government lot with a firearm and a camera is highly "abnormal" behavior that naturally prompts a public safety check—he completely validates the journalist's right to be there. When Payne asks for the journalist's name to document the contact, the journalist politely declines, asserting he has broken no laws and identifying only as a "good citizen." Because Supervisor Payne actually knows the law, he recognizes a legal stalemate when he sees one. He understands that the journalist is fully within his rights to open carry, film, and refuse identification without reasonable suspicion of a crime. Rather than letting his deputies violate a citizen's rights, Payne shuts down the interaction, commands his team to leave, and walks away. This supervisor likely saved his county thousands of dollars in legal fees just by respecting the Constitution. The walk of shame is in effect at the end as it should be.

Giggling Ganon

132,645 views • 1 month ago

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

Jack Prescott

31,505 views • 26 days ago

PURE FUCKING VENOM... Pure, unadulterated venom flooding my veins like molten fucking ecstasy... This is me right now...predatory, ravenous, utterly alive...watching the War Room implode in a spectacular, self-inflicted orgy of ruin. All of them. Every last grifting, pedo-shielding, populist-cosplaying scum in that rotten orbit. Your high priest exposed as the Epstein-courting degenerate he always was...texting the child-trafficking devil like old war buddies, filming cozy interviews to rehabilitate a monster, basking in the glow of "God shorts" while preaching about elite pedophile cabals from his triple-shirted throne. Your silence now? Deafening. Guilty. A collective throat-slit confession. Blocking, deflecting, memory-holing...pathetic little death throes while the blade twists deeper. You thought you owned the movement. Thought your merch scams, your endless fundraising texts, your performative screeching made you kings. You were never warriors. Just parasites. Leeches in patriot clothing, sucking the life from a cause you poisoned for profit and proximity to power. Now the empire crumbles...radioactive ash raining down on your hypocritical heads...and I’m not just watching. I’m feasting. Licking the blood from my claws, savoring every scream as your grift palace burns. Excommunicado. Blacklisted. Eradicated from the soul of MAGA. 🗡️💀🗡️

PURE FUCKING VENOM... Pure, unadulterated venom flooding my veins like molten fucking ecstasy... This is me right now...predatory, ravenous, utterly alive...watching the War Room implode in a spectacular, self-inflicted orgy of ruin. All of them. Every last grifting, pedo-shielding, populist-cosplaying scum in that rotten orbit. Your high priest exposed as the Epstein-courting degenerate he always was...texting the child-trafficking devil like old war buddies, filming cozy interviews to rehabilitate a monster, basking in the glow of "God shorts" while preaching about elite pedophile cabals from his triple-shirted throne. Your silence now? Deafening. Guilty. A collective throat-slit confession. Blocking, deflecting, memory-holing...pathetic little death throes while the blade twists deeper. You thought you owned the movement. Thought your merch scams, your endless fundraising texts, your performative screeching made you kings. You were never warriors. Just parasites. Leeches in patriot clothing, sucking the life from a cause you poisoned for profit and proximity to power. Now the empire crumbles...radioactive ash raining down on your hypocritical heads...and I’m not just watching. I’m feasting. Licking the blood from my claws, savoring every scream as your grift palace burns. Excommunicado. Blacklisted. Eradicated from the soul of MAGA. 🗡️💀🗡️

LHGrey™️

20,070 views • 6 months ago

In China, every public-school class runs a mandatory WeChat group, and the teacher uses it to push the school's work onto parents. Parents grade and sign the daily homework, and one missed punctuation mark gets the kid called out in the group. One kindergarten made parents watch a variety show and write a 10,000-character reflection; a mother stayed up till 4 a.m. doing it. After every notice, parents reply with what People's Daily called the three-piece set: received, you've worked hard, thank you. 老师辛苦了—Teacher, you've worked so hard. Then a father in Jiangsu refused. He'd just finished grading his kid's homework, the job a teacher is paid to do. Instead of typing the line, he filmed himself, asked who was actually tired here, and quit the group on camera. The clip topped Weibo's hot-search in hours and drew over 560 million reads in two days. Zhang Jiewei, a CPPCC member in Lishui, explained how this system came to be. The bureau orders less homework, but schools are still judged on how many kids test into good schools. So the work gets handed down until it stops at the parents, because the only thing below them is the kid. After the video took off, and millions of parents started sharing their own stories, the provincial governments moved fast. Liaoning ordered teachers to mark homework themselves, and a dozen other provinces followed suit. Authorities even went after the flattery, banning the bootlicking reply outright. The father was the first to say, on camera, that the “thank-you” was a lie. The economist Timur Kuran calls this preference falsification: countless parents had each typed 老师辛苦了 alone, sure they were alone in hating it, and, after the video, looked up to find everyone secretly agreed.

In China, every public-school class runs a mandatory WeChat group, and the teacher uses it to push the school's work onto parents. Parents grade and sign the daily homework, and one missed punctuation mark gets the kid called out in the group. One kindergarten made parents watch a variety show and write a 10,000-character reflection; a mother stayed up till 4 a.m. doing it. After every notice, parents reply with what People's Daily called the three-piece set: received, you've worked hard, thank you. 老师辛苦了—Teacher, you've worked so hard. Then a father in Jiangsu refused. He'd just finished grading his kid's homework, the job a teacher is paid to do. Instead of typing the line, he filmed himself, asked who was actually tired here, and quit the group on camera. The clip topped Weibo's hot-search in hours and drew over 560 million reads in two days. Zhang Jiewei, a CPPCC member in Lishui, explained how this system came to be. The bureau orders less homework, but schools are still judged on how many kids test into good schools. So the work gets handed down until it stops at the parents, because the only thing below them is the kid. After the video took off, and millions of parents started sharing their own stories, the provincial governments moved fast. Liaoning ordered teachers to mark homework themselves, and a dozen other provinces followed suit. Authorities even went after the flattery, banning the bootlicking reply outright. The father was the first to say, on camera, that the “thank-you” was a lie. The economist Timur Kuran calls this preference falsification: countless parents had each typed 老师辛苦了 alone, sure they were alone in hating it, and, after the video, looked up to find everyone secretly agreed.

Sam Szuchan

203,170 views • 8 days ago

🚨SPACEX WILL CRASH JUST LIKE TESLA DID IN 2010 The exact same setup played out 16 years ago. Rewind to 2010. Tesla goes public at $1.13. Pumps to $2.03 in days. The timeline floods with the same takes: "Elon is building the future." "This is a generational entry." "You will regret missing this." Then reality showed up. Tesla bled almost 50% in one week. $2.03 → $1.00 Retail got flushed before the real run even started. Fast forward to now. 2026: – SpaceX just printed the biggest IPO in market history – +30% from the IPO price on day one – $1.75T valuation out the gate – Retail access unlocked at the very last second – Everyone is already calling it "the next Tesla" But the setup is nothing alike. Tesla 2010 launched into: - A beaten down market - Low expectations - Small cap valuation - Zero hype tax SpaceX 2026 is launching into: - The most overvalued market on record - Peak retail euphoria - A $1.75T price tag before a single earnings report - Every fund already positioned That is not the same trade. That is the exit liquidity version of it. People hear Tesla 2010 and only remember the pump. Tesla pumped first. Then it destroyed everyone who chased it. That part always gets removed from the screenshot. Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium and the same future narrative, but much worse timing. So you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch candle. Or learn from what Tesla already did. Reminder: I called Bitcoin at $16K, the top at $126K, and gold before it ran. Eight years of calls, all public. When I exit this market, I post it here first. Every move goes here too. Turn notifications on. You will understand why later.

🚨SPACEX WILL CRASH JUST LIKE TESLA DID IN 2010 The exact same setup played out 16 years ago. Rewind to 2010. Tesla goes public at $1.13. Pumps to $2.03 in days. The timeline floods with the same takes: "Elon is building the future." "This is a generational entry." "You will regret missing this." Then reality showed up. Tesla bled almost 50% in one week. $2.03 → $1.00 Retail got flushed before the real run even started. Fast forward to now. 2026: – SpaceX just printed the biggest IPO in market history – +30% from the IPO price on day one – $1.75T valuation out the gate – Retail access unlocked at the very last second – Everyone is already calling it "the next Tesla" But the setup is nothing alike. Tesla 2010 launched into: - A beaten down market - Low expectations - Small cap valuation - Zero hype tax SpaceX 2026 is launching into: - The most overvalued market on record - Peak retail euphoria - A $1.75T price tag before a single earnings report - Every fund already positioned That is not the same trade. That is the exit liquidity version of it. People hear Tesla 2010 and only remember the pump. Tesla pumped first. Then it destroyed everyone who chased it. That part always gets removed from the screenshot. Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium and the same future narrative, but much worse timing. So you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch candle. Or learn from what Tesla already did. Reminder: I called Bitcoin at $16K, the top at $126K, and gold before it ran. Eight years of calls, all public. When I exit this market, I post it here first. Every move goes here too. Turn notifications on. You will understand why later.

winkle.

191,834 views • 2 months ago

🚨 WHAT HAPPENED TO IRAN IN 1979 DIDN’T START WITH A REVOLUTION — IT STARTED WITH A LIE In this powerful moment from my interview with Ida Turan, she explains how propaganda can reshape reality — and how the same tactics were used before the 1979 Iranian Revolution. As she describes it, the strategy was simple: Create a lie that is highly emotional — something involving children, suffering, or outrage — and repeat it so often that people stop questioning it. Eventually the narrative becomes accepted as fact. According to Ida, this is exactly what happened in the final years before the Shah was overthrown. Smear campaigns painted him as a monster. False stories spread through media networks. And one of the most notorious incidents — the Cinema Rex fire — was blamed on the Shah at the time, despite later evidence pointing elsewhere. The effect was devastating. Public trust collapsed. The army hesitated. And the door was opened for Khomeini’s Islamist regime to seize power. For many Iranians who lived through those events, the lesson is painfully clear: When propaganda replaces truth, entire nations can be pushed toward disaster. Ida’s message is not just about Iran’s past. It is a warning about how powerful narratives can shape history itself. Reza Pahlavi Reza Pahlavi Communications Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

🚨 WHAT HAPPENED TO IRAN IN 1979 DIDN’T START WITH A REVOLUTION — IT STARTED WITH A LIE In this powerful moment from my interview with Ida Turan, she explains how propaganda can reshape reality — and how the same tactics were used before the 1979 Iranian Revolution. As she describes it, the strategy was simple: Create a lie that is highly emotional — something involving children, suffering, or outrage — and repeat it so often that people stop questioning it. Eventually the narrative becomes accepted as fact. According to Ida, this is exactly what happened in the final years before the Shah was overthrown. Smear campaigns painted him as a monster. False stories spread through media networks. And one of the most notorious incidents — the Cinema Rex fire — was blamed on the Shah at the time, despite later evidence pointing elsewhere. The effect was devastating. Public trust collapsed. The army hesitated. And the door was opened for Khomeini’s Islamist regime to seize power. For many Iranians who lived through those events, the lesson is painfully clear: When propaganda replaces truth, entire nations can be pushed toward disaster. Ida’s message is not just about Iran’s past. It is a warning about how powerful narratives can shape history itself. Reza Pahlavi Reza Pahlavi Communications Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

Jim Ferguson

30,912 views • 5 months ago

Bully cop gets his feelings hurt by a man with an open container takes things to the point that he got removed from duty pending investigation. Just after midnight on March 12, 2026, a Daytona Beach police officer, identified as Joel Llinas, approached 27-year-old tourist David Anderson, who was carrying a bottle of alcohol in public. Officer Llinas gave Anderson the option to either pour out the beverage or face a city open container violation. Anderson handed the bottle over to the officer. According to police reports, a physical struggle began when Anderson allegedly threw the bottle's cap at the officer immediately after handing over the bottle. Officer Llinas immediately took Anderson to the ground to place him under arrest, where he was subsequently handcuffed. The tension peaked after Anderson was moved to the front of the patrol car. Anderson verbally taunted the officer, stating, "I almost took you out, didn't I?" The situation quickly intensified as the officer took Anderson back to the ground. While bystander crowds gathered, footage captured a struggle on the pavement where the officer used unnecessary actions on Anderson while he was already restrained. The fallout from the incident was immediate: Anderson was initially charged with an open container violation and felony battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the State Attorney's Office officially dropped the felony battery charge, noting that the nature of the arrest itself was sufficient. Daytona Beach Police Chief Jakari Young publicly addressed the footage, calling it "concerning" and stating it did not align with departmental standards. Officer Llinas was removed from patrol duties and placed on administrative leave pending a formal internal affairs use-of-force review. Two wrongs don't make a right. If the bottle cap was indeed throw at the officer, then take him into custody with only the level of force need to place in custody. Everything else beyond that was excessive.

Bully cop gets his feelings hurt by a man with an open container takes things to the point that he got removed from duty pending investigation. Just after midnight on March 12, 2026, a Daytona Beach police officer, identified as Joel Llinas, approached 27-year-old tourist David Anderson, who was carrying a bottle of alcohol in public. Officer Llinas gave Anderson the option to either pour out the beverage or face a city open container violation. Anderson handed the bottle over to the officer. According to police reports, a physical struggle began when Anderson allegedly threw the bottle's cap at the officer immediately after handing over the bottle. Officer Llinas immediately took Anderson to the ground to place him under arrest, where he was subsequently handcuffed. The tension peaked after Anderson was moved to the front of the patrol car. Anderson verbally taunted the officer, stating, "I almost took you out, didn't I?" The situation quickly intensified as the officer took Anderson back to the ground. While bystander crowds gathered, footage captured a struggle on the pavement where the officer used unnecessary actions on Anderson while he was already restrained. The fallout from the incident was immediate: Anderson was initially charged with an open container violation and felony battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the State Attorney's Office officially dropped the felony battery charge, noting that the nature of the arrest itself was sufficient. Daytona Beach Police Chief Jakari Young publicly addressed the footage, calling it "concerning" and stating it did not align with departmental standards. Officer Llinas was removed from patrol duties and placed on administrative leave pending a formal internal affairs use-of-force review. Two wrongs don't make a right. If the bottle cap was indeed throw at the officer, then take him into custody with only the level of force need to place in custody. Everything else beyond that was excessive.

Giggling Ganon

470,490 views • 2 months ago

GPT-5.6 Pro is insane. It didn’t just beat Claude 5, Fable and Mythos. It crushed them. One prompt, just 5 minutes. And voila: A full low-poly Three.js island game with water, beach bar, boat, shark, fish, whales, sports area, NPCs and Ibiza vibes This is getting ridiculous. That is what I would write if I was not honest with you. That is what I would post if I only wanted a viral clickbait tweet. And this is exactly why you should always be careful with what you read on social media, especially on X. There is no GPT-5.6 yet. This prototype was made with GPT-5.5, in 6 iterations, after more than 40 minutes of back-and-forth with Codex. Yes, it started with one prompt, and I will share that prompt below. But the final result came from many corrections, adjustments, fixes, visual tweaks, Three.js issues, camera changes, object placement improvements, and a lot of manual direction. That is the real workflow. I share build in public content here to show what you can actually do with AI, but also to show that there is no magic dust. AI is powerful. Very powerful. But the difference between a cool demo and a real usable prototype is still iteration, feedback, taste, debugging, and direction. Yes, I am also waiting for GPT-5.6. It will probably arrive next week, and when it does, we will test it here properly, in public, with real prompts, real iterations, and real results.

GPT-5.6 Pro is insane. It didn’t just beat Claude 5, Fable and Mythos. It crushed them. One prompt, just 5 minutes. And voila: A full low-poly Three.js island game with water, beach bar, boat, shark, fish, whales, sports area, NPCs and Ibiza vibes This is getting ridiculous. That is what I would write if I was not honest with you. That is what I would post if I only wanted a viral clickbait tweet. And this is exactly why you should always be careful with what you read on social media, especially on X. There is no GPT-5.6 yet. This prototype was made with GPT-5.5, in 6 iterations, after more than 40 minutes of back-and-forth with Codex. Yes, it started with one prompt, and I will share that prompt below. But the final result came from many corrections, adjustments, fixes, visual tweaks, Three.js issues, camera changes, object placement improvements, and a lot of manual direction. That is the real workflow. I share build in public content here to show what you can actually do with AI, but also to show that there is no magic dust. AI is powerful. Very powerful. But the difference between a cool demo and a real usable prototype is still iteration, feedback, taste, debugging, and direction. Yes, I am also waiting for GPT-5.6. It will probably arrive next week, and when it does, we will test it here properly, in public, with real prompts, real iterations, and real results.

Givros

62,031 views • 2 months ago

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 THE MASK DROPS: JOURNALIST GOES TO PROVE MUSLIMS ARE "PEACEFUL" — MOB SHOWS UP TO KILL HER INSTEAD ☠️ The irony would be a chef’s kiss if it weren’t so deadly serious. A journalist waltzes into a Muslim enclave in England, cameras rolling, narrative pre-written — “look at these peaceful, law-abiding citizens, nothing to see here, you bigots.” The script writes itself. It’s the same one the legacy media has been running for two decades straight. And then reality intervenes. Within minutes, a gang of masked men swarm her. They don’t want an interview. They don’t want dialogue. They want her gone — and they make it abundantly clear she’s leaving in a body bag if she doesn’t comply. The live feed gets cut. The studio anchor is stammering apologies for the “language.” The journalist gets escorted out, tail between her legs, narrative in tatters. This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s the Birmingham pattern — and it keeps repeating: - Sky News reporter Becky Johnson, August 2024: surrounded by masked men on bikes, shouting profanities and “Free Palestine,” forced off-air mid-broadcast. A man with a knife chased the van and tried to slash the tires. A year later, when she returned to the same neighborhood, a man in a car mimed pulling a trigger at her head. - Christian preacher in Walsall, January 2023: mob of 20-30 Muslims formed a ring around him, threatened to cut his throat, beat him, and abduct him — for preaching that the Qur’an presents a false Jesus. Police response? Arrest the preacher for “blasphemy.” The mob walked free. A judge later threw out the charges, but the message was sent. Same neighborhoods, same script: white resident Gerry Moynihan admitted he stayed inside his own home that day because the "intelligence" was that the mobs were "looking for what they thought were the enemy — white people — and trying to find white people." The Narrative vs. The Footage The establishment gaslights the public with one hand while their own camera crews are fleeing for their lives on the other. The cognitive dissonance is staggering: View the table below. The 2030 Agenda crowd — the globalist technocrats pushing mass migration, open borders, and the dissolution of national identity — didn’t just break England. They lobotomized it. They convinced the ruling class that importing millions of people from cultures that view Western values as a disease to be eradicated would somehow produce... Sweden. Look how that turned out. The Real Two-Tier System When a white man says something offensive online, the full weight of the British state descends on him — dawn raids, criminal charges, career destruction. When a mob of masked men threatens to murder a female journalist on live television for the crime of standing on a street with a microphone, the system suddenly discovers its deep reservoir of “context” and “community tensions.” The journalist who went in expecting to film a puff piece about peaceful Muslims got the uncut director’s commentary instead. The mask didn’t just slip — it was ripped off and thrown at the camera. The lesson? You can gaslight a nation for twenty years with carefully edited news packages and diversity-committee-approved scripts. But you can’t edit the live feed fast enough when the truth charges at the lens on two wheels, masked up, screaming for blood. #TheMaskDrops #NarrativeVsReality #BirminghamExposed #TwoTierEverything #LiveFeedDoesntLie #2030AgendaWasteland #TheyCantEditFastEnough #PeacefulOnPaper can’t director’s didn’t Qur’an “ chef’s chef’s

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 THE MASK DROPS: JOURNALIST GOES TO PROVE MUSLIMS ARE "PEACEFUL" — MOB SHOWS UP TO KILL HER INSTEAD ☠️ The irony would be a chef’s kiss if it weren’t so deadly serious. A journalist waltzes into a Muslim enclave in England, cameras rolling, narrative pre-written — “look at these peaceful, law-abiding citizens, nothing to see here, you bigots.” The script writes itself. It’s the same one the legacy media has been running for two decades straight. And then reality intervenes. Within minutes, a gang of masked men swarm her. They don’t want an interview. They don’t want dialogue. They want her gone — and they make it abundantly clear she’s leaving in a body bag if she doesn’t comply. The live feed gets cut. The studio anchor is stammering apologies for the “language.” The journalist gets escorted out, tail between her legs, narrative in tatters. This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s the Birmingham pattern — and it keeps repeating: - Sky News reporter Becky Johnson, August 2024: surrounded by masked men on bikes, shouting profanities and “Free Palestine,” forced off-air mid-broadcast. A man with a knife chased the van and tried to slash the tires. A year later, when she returned to the same neighborhood, a man in a car mimed pulling a trigger at her head. - Christian preacher in Walsall, January 2023: mob of 20-30 Muslims formed a ring around him, threatened to cut his throat, beat him, and abduct him — for preaching that the Qur’an presents a false Jesus. Police response? Arrest the preacher for “blasphemy.” The mob walked free. A judge later threw out the charges, but the message was sent. Same neighborhoods, same script: white resident Gerry Moynihan admitted he stayed inside his own home that day because the "intelligence" was that the mobs were "looking for what they thought were the enemy — white people — and trying to find white people." The Narrative vs. The Footage The establishment gaslights the public with one hand while their own camera crews are fleeing for their lives on the other. The cognitive dissonance is staggering: View the table below. The 2030 Agenda crowd — the globalist technocrats pushing mass migration, open borders, and the dissolution of national identity — didn’t just break England. They lobotomized it. They convinced the ruling class that importing millions of people from cultures that view Western values as a disease to be eradicated would somehow produce... Sweden. Look how that turned out. The Real Two-Tier System When a white man says something offensive online, the full weight of the British state descends on him — dawn raids, criminal charges, career destruction. When a mob of masked men threatens to murder a female journalist on live television for the crime of standing on a street with a microphone, the system suddenly discovers its deep reservoir of “context” and “community tensions.” The journalist who went in expecting to film a puff piece about peaceful Muslims got the uncut director’s commentary instead. The mask didn’t just slip — it was ripped off and thrown at the camera. The lesson? You can gaslight a nation for twenty years with carefully edited news packages and diversity-committee-approved scripts. But you can’t edit the live feed fast enough when the truth charges at the lens on two wheels, masked up, screaming for blood. #TheMaskDrops #NarrativeVsReality #BirminghamExposed #TwoTierEverything #LiveFeedDoesntLie #2030AgendaWasteland #TheyCantEditFastEnough #PeacefulOnPaper can’t director’s didn’t Qur’an “ chef’s chef’s

Tony Seruga

15,908 views • 2 months ago

$Ormand beach police arrest sheriff department detective creating a conflict between two departments they elevated to a federal lawsuit. What started as a routine speeding infraction on a Florida highway quickly escalated into a high-stakes, gunpoint arrest involving two neighboring law enforcement agencies—and it’s now the subject of a federal civil rights lawsuit. An Ormond Beach Police Department (OBPD) sergeant clocked an unmarked vehicle flying down North U.S. Highway 1 at 88 mph in a 55 mph zone. When the sergeant activated his lights and sirens, the vehicle didn't pull over right away. According to police reports, it continued for roughly 1.9 miles, weaving through traffic and accelerating up to 90 mph while other civilian motorists pulled off the road. Believing the driver was actively fleeing, officers deployed Stop Sticks. The driver maneuvered around them and finally pulled over, leading to a high-risk felony stop at gunpoint. When the driver stepped out, officers realized they weren't dealing with a typical suspect. The man in handcuffs was Detective Ardit Coma, an active-duty detective with the neighboring Flagler County Sheriff's Office (FCSO) Major Case Unit. He was driving his agency-issued unmarked vehicle on his way to work. Det. Coma was visibly confused during the arrest, audibly laughing and asking, "When did that happen?" when told he was fleeing. He maintained that due to the heavy window tint on his undercover vehicle and the dewy morning conditions, he never saw or heard the officer behind him. In fact, he claimed he only pulled over because he saw an officer throwing Stop Sticks and thought a fellow brother in blue needed assistance—completely unaware he was the target. The arrest immediately sparked a public rift between agency heads. Flagler County Sheriff Rick Staly publicly criticized the arrest, stating there was a glaring lack of evidence proving criminal intent to flee. Meanwhile, Ormond Beach Police Chief Jesse Godfrey firmly defended his sergeant's actions based on the reckless speeds and failure to yield. Just five days later, the State Attorney's Office formally dismissed the felony fleeing and eluding charges due to a lack of evidence regarding criminal intent. An FCSO internal investigation sustained policy violations for speeding. Det. Coma accepted responsibility, receiving a two-day suspension without pay and losing his take-home vehicle privileges for 90 days. In April 2026, Det. Coma officially filed a federal civil lawsuit against the City of Ormond Beach and the arresting sergeant. The lawsuit alleges false arrest, unlawful seizure, and Fourth Amendment violations, claiming a simple traffic infraction was illegally escalated into a felony arrest out of sheer frustration. We will keep an eye on this one and circle back once the lawsuit ends.$

Ormand beach police arrest sheriff department detective creating a conflict between two departments they elevated to a federal lawsuit. What started as a routine speeding infraction on a Florida highway quickly escalated into a high-stakes, gunpoint arrest involving two neighboring law enforcement agencies—and it’s now the subject of a federal civil rights lawsuit. An Ormond Beach Police Department (OBPD) sergeant clocked an unmarked vehicle flying down North U.S. Highway 1 at 88 mph in a 55 mph zone. When the sergeant activated his lights and sirens, the vehicle didn't pull over right away. According to police reports, it continued for roughly 1.9 miles, weaving through traffic and accelerating up to 90 mph while other civilian motorists pulled off the road. Believing the driver was actively fleeing, officers deployed Stop Sticks. The driver maneuvered around them and finally pulled over, leading to a high-risk felony stop at gunpoint. When the driver stepped out, officers realized they weren't dealing with a typical suspect. The man in handcuffs was Detective Ardit Coma, an active-duty detective with the neighboring Flagler County Sheriff's Office (FCSO) Major Case Unit. He was driving his agency-issued unmarked vehicle on his way to work. Det. Coma was visibly confused during the arrest, audibly laughing and asking, "When did that happen?" when told he was fleeing. He maintained that due to the heavy window tint on his undercover vehicle and the dewy morning conditions, he never saw or heard the officer behind him. In fact, he claimed he only pulled over because he saw an officer throwing Stop Sticks and thought a fellow brother in blue needed assistance—completely unaware he was the target. The arrest immediately sparked a public rift between agency heads. Flagler County Sheriff Rick Staly publicly criticized the arrest, stating there was a glaring lack of evidence proving criminal intent to flee. Meanwhile, Ormond Beach Police Chief Jesse Godfrey firmly defended his sergeant's actions based on the reckless speeds and failure to yield. Just five days later, the State Attorney's Office formally dismissed the felony fleeing and eluding charges due to a lack of evidence regarding criminal intent. An FCSO internal investigation sustained policy violations for speeding. Det. Coma accepted responsibility, receiving a two-day suspension without pay and losing his take-home vehicle privileges for 90 days. In April 2026, Det. Coma officially filed a federal civil lawsuit against the City of Ormond Beach and the arresting sergeant. The lawsuit alleges false arrest, unlawful seizure, and Fourth Amendment violations, claiming a simple traffic infraction was illegally escalated into a felony arrest out of sheer frustration. We will keep an eye on this one and circle back once the lawsuit ends.

Giggling Ganon

42,717 views • 1 month ago

💬 Do any of you still remember RealPlayer™? Back in the 1990s, websites were just text, links and if you were very lucky some images, but definitely NOT video or audio Internet speeds were extremely slow (think 2.5kb/s, so about 10,000 times slower than an average connection now) so it was simply impossible or it'd take ages to load RealPlayer changed that, they made a heavy compression codec for video and audio where a video could be just a few kilobytes, and with that it instantly became the first app that let people play real audio and video inside websites, it integrated into browsers like Netscape or Internet Explorer so people could embed video and audio on sites, and they did! RealPlayer was so successful that by the year 2000 more than 85% of all audio or video content on the web was in the RealPlayer format The app itself was free for people to use, and they made money by charging for the server software that would stream the video and audio They IPO'd during the internet bubble of the late 90s and were valued at $550 million dollars, which would be $1B inflation-adjusted now, so they were a billion dollar company (That internet bubble by the way has endless parallels with the AI bubble we're probably in today) So why don't you hear about them these days anymore? Well, Microsoft started bundling Windows Media Player with Windows, just like they did bundling Internet Explorer, and they gave away the server software for streaming Windows Media content (like .wma and .wmv) for free This overnight nuked RealPlayer's business, so they sued Microsoft for unfair competition, they won in court in 2005, and Microsoft agreed to pay them $761 million to settle, so I think the founder still got rich from it That same year in 2005, YouTube started and around 2008 the HTML standard added the tag while making most video streaming tech open source, so it wasn't a business anymore RealPlayer stayed public as a company though until actually recently, 2022, when the original founder Rob Glaser bought it back and took it private for about $25 million Obviously nobody needs a video streaming app anymore, it's integrated in all platforms, software, and devices now, so now they seem to be focusing on "AI-powered facial recognition for security professionals" On my site I've installed RealPlayer for you go back into time and try and managed to the get streaming part working too, so you can listen to actual radio show from the 90s about UFOs at Roswell which I found on Jason Scott's Discmaster archives These days we all watch video on YouTube, Instagram, X and TikTok etc. but it all started with RealPlayer 😊

💬 Do any of you still remember RealPlayer™? Back in the 1990s, websites were just text, links and if you were very lucky some images, but definitely NOT video or audio Internet speeds were extremely slow (think 2.5kb/s, so about 10,000 times slower than an average connection now) so it was simply impossible or it'd take ages to load RealPlayer changed that, they made a heavy compression codec for video and audio where a video could be just a few kilobytes, and with that it instantly became the first app that let people play real audio and video inside websites, it integrated into browsers like Netscape or Internet Explorer so people could embed video and audio on sites, and they did! RealPlayer was so successful that by the year 2000 more than 85% of all audio or video content on the web was in the RealPlayer format The app itself was free for people to use, and they made money by charging for the server software that would stream the video and audio They IPO'd during the internet bubble of the late 90s and were valued at $550 million dollars, which would be $1B inflation-adjusted now, so they were a billion dollar company (That internet bubble by the way has endless parallels with the AI bubble we're probably in today) So why don't you hear about them these days anymore? Well, Microsoft started bundling Windows Media Player with Windows, just like they did bundling Internet Explorer, and they gave away the server software for streaming Windows Media content (like .wma and .wmv) for free This overnight nuked RealPlayer's business, so they sued Microsoft for unfair competition, they won in court in 2005, and Microsoft agreed to pay them $761 million to settle, so I think the founder still got rich from it That same year in 2005, YouTube started and around 2008 the HTML standard added the tag while making most video streaming tech open source, so it wasn't a business anymore RealPlayer stayed public as a company though until actually recently, 2022, when the original founder Rob Glaser bought it back and took it private for about $25 million Obviously nobody needs a video streaming app anymore, it's integrated in all platforms, software, and devices now, so now they seem to be focusing on "AI-powered facial recognition for security professionals" On my site I've installed RealPlayer for you go back into time and try and managed to the get streaming part working too, so you can listen to actual radio show from the 90s about UFOs at Roswell which I found on Jason Scott's Discmaster archives These days we all watch video on YouTube, Instagram, X and TikTok etc. but it all started with RealPlayer 😊

@levelsio

203,157 views • 7 months ago

Krishnamoorthi: When I saw where Ghislaine Maxwell was doing her remote deposition from, it did not look like a prison. It looked like a dining room. It looked like some nice mansion. It just reminded me that she got this sweetheart deal from Trump in return for her silence, fabricating testimony, or “exonerating Donald Trump.” Then her lawyer says, well, if you were to give her clemency, then she would really tell you the whole truth. And it’s like, come on, man — this is completely backwards. In our country, you don’t get clemency, you don’t get a pardon — or you should not — unless you admit guilt, show remorse, cooperate, and try to do what law enforcement and the public want you to do to make things right. She’s done none of those things. She’s never admitted guilt. She’s never shown remorse. And now she’s saying she’s only going to cooperate if she gets clemency. So I’ve introduced a resolution saying she should never be given clemency. She should never get a pardon. She’s a monster.

Krishnamoorthi: When I saw where Ghislaine Maxwell was doing her remote deposition from, it did not look like a prison. It looked like a dining room. It looked like some nice mansion. It just reminded me that she got this sweetheart deal from Trump in return for her silence, fabricating testimony, or “exonerating Donald Trump.” Then her lawyer says, well, if you were to give her clemency, then she would really tell you the whole truth. And it’s like, come on, man — this is completely backwards. In our country, you don’t get clemency, you don’t get a pardon — or you should not — unless you admit guilt, show remorse, cooperate, and try to do what law enforcement and the public want you to do to make things right. She’s done none of those things. She’s never admitted guilt. She’s never shown remorse. And now she’s saying she’s only going to cooperate if she gets clemency. So I’ve introduced a resolution saying she should never be given clemency. She should never get a pardon. She’s a monster.

Acyn

104,772 views • 6 months ago

Most people who hate $QUBIC have never actually read what it is. They saw “IOTA” and stopped reading. Here is what is actually happening with this project before you form an opinion: $QUBIC started as a concept inside the IOTA ecosystem back in 2018. The original vision was called Quorum Based Computations. The idea was to build smart contracts, oracles, and decentralised computing on top of IOTA’s feeless ledger. It was years ahead of the market in ambition. IOTA never fully built it, so the founder built it himself. Sergey Ivancheglo (Come From Beyond) is the man behind $QUBIC today. He co-created IOTA and created NXT before that, one of the first Proof of Stake blockchains in crypto history. He left IOTA in 2019 after public disagreements with the foundation and took the Qubic vision independent. That history is real. The drama was real. It is also irrelevant to what $QUBIC does technically today. Here is the honest picture of what the project actually is: - $QUBIC runs on Useful Proof of Work. Miners do not waste energy on meaningless calculations. The computation trains AI models instead. Every hash has a function. That is a genuinely novel concept. - The network claims over 15 million transactions per second in verified tests. It has no gas fees. Finality is near instant. The architecture is bare metal, meaning no virtual machine overhead, which is how those numbers are possible. - The token has a fixed supply and a burn mechanism. There was no premine and no VC allocation. The launch was as fair as crypto gets. The legitimate concerns are also real: - The governance is concentrated. 676 Computers control consensus. There is an Arbitrator role with significant power. For a project that claims decentralisation, that structure deserves scrutiny. - The AI component called Aigarth is still unproven at scale. The TPS claims have not been tested under real world load conditions comparable to what Visa or Solana handles daily. - And the founder’s track record includes public breakdowns and legal threats during the IOTA years. That history does not disappear because the project is new. So here is the honest conclusion: $QUBIC is not a scam. It is also not a sure thing. It is a technically ambitious Layer 1 with a controversial founder, real innovation in Useful Proof of Work and AI integration, legitimate governance concerns, and a community that is growing without traditional VC backing. The people calling it a guaranteed 100x are not doing you any favours. Neither are the people calling it an obvious rug without checking the on chain data. Understand what you hold before price moves you emotionally in either direction. This is for educational purposes only, never financial advice. You will want to find this post later.

Most people who hate $QUBIC have never actually read what it is. They saw “IOTA” and stopped reading. Here is what is actually happening with this project before you form an opinion: $QUBIC started as a concept inside the IOTA ecosystem back in 2018. The original vision was called Quorum Based Computations. The idea was to build smart contracts, oracles, and decentralised computing on top of IOTA’s feeless ledger. It was years ahead of the market in ambition. IOTA never fully built it, so the founder built it himself. Sergey Ivancheglo (Come From Beyond) is the man behind $QUBIC today. He co-created IOTA and created NXT before that, one of the first Proof of Stake blockchains in crypto history. He left IOTA in 2019 after public disagreements with the foundation and took the Qubic vision independent. That history is real. The drama was real. It is also irrelevant to what $QUBIC does technically today. Here is the honest picture of what the project actually is: - $QUBIC runs on Useful Proof of Work. Miners do not waste energy on meaningless calculations. The computation trains AI models instead. Every hash has a function. That is a genuinely novel concept. - The network claims over 15 million transactions per second in verified tests. It has no gas fees. Finality is near instant. The architecture is bare metal, meaning no virtual machine overhead, which is how those numbers are possible. - The token has a fixed supply and a burn mechanism. There was no premine and no VC allocation. The launch was as fair as crypto gets. The legitimate concerns are also real: - The governance is concentrated. 676 Computers control consensus. There is an Arbitrator role with significant power. For a project that claims decentralisation, that structure deserves scrutiny. - The AI component called Aigarth is still unproven at scale. The TPS claims have not been tested under real world load conditions comparable to what Visa or Solana handles daily. - And the founder’s track record includes public breakdowns and legal threats during the IOTA years. That history does not disappear because the project is new. So here is the honest conclusion: $QUBIC is not a scam. It is also not a sure thing. It is a technically ambitious Layer 1 with a controversial founder, real innovation in Useful Proof of Work and AI integration, legitimate governance concerns, and a community that is growing without traditional VC backing. The people calling it a guaranteed 100x are not doing you any favours. Neither are the people calling it an obvious rug without checking the on chain data. Understand what you hold before price moves you emotionally in either direction. This is for educational purposes only, never financial advice. You will want to find this post later.

2xnmore

15,706 views • 4 months ago

Dr. Elizabeth Mumper described how much kickback money from INSURANCE COMPANIES she refused to receive by not forcing vaccines on children. I'm pretty sure pushing back against this corrupt system as a mother for my son Salias is what got me into my financial battle with them. Being very vocal that I was MAGA / MAHA likely didn't help either. I don't have any options. A lawyer told me state insurance is allowed to do what they're doing to us. Because Salias is on state insurance, they're allowed to do what they're doing because we didn't get him up to date on vaccines within a certain time frame. That time frame was his 1 year checkup which is when all this insurance backdating started. On his 1 year appointment, we had it out with Salias pediatrician when she said we need to get him up to date on vaccines after pushing them off for so long. I kept pushing them off because of Salias' seizures and the mass in his throat that causes him to suffocate when it overfills with blood from too much pressure. She was persistent and at his 1+year I told her it's just hard to trust vaccines given they tried to force the Covid-19 vaccines on the child chart and doctors would still push it despite the risks of it just to get their kickbacks from insurance companies and that I hoped RFK Jr would put a stop to all of that. By the end of that appointment she told me Salias was not welcome back to her clinic for not getting up to date on his shots and within a few days after that, the state insurance company started back charging us, for even his BIRTH. For the fist 4 moths of his life, he spent a WEEK overnight in the hospital due to his breathing issues. That was very expensive, but when now back charged with all those, we paid it so we could continue seeing the ENT at Nationwide Children's Hospital specialists we needed for Salias. The state insurance company views Salias as a financial liability for not being vaccinated not just to them, but now to OTHER children he said because they view vaccines as the greatest medical achievement of the 20th century. He said state insurance companies are ALLOWED to do this. Private insurance companies or insurance companies provided through employment, are not. This is how the state strong arms parents into vaccinations, especially for public schooling. State insurance feeds into public schooling which ensures vaccine charts remain full which means autoimmune issues and Big Pharma customers for life. A huge potion of destroying the middle class gets people onto state insurance and into public schooling to expand their profit margins. I'M PRETTY SURE in the 90s if you didn't fully vaccinate your child, CPS could tale your children for "neglect." It's the insurance company who are the ones giving kickbacks to doctors for vaccines dictating future policies. My son Salias’s Health Journey:

Dr. Elizabeth Mumper described how much kickback money from INSURANCE COMPANIES she refused to receive by not forcing vaccines on children. I'm pretty sure pushing back against this corrupt system as a mother for my son Salias is what got me into my financial battle with them. Being very vocal that I was MAGA / MAHA likely didn't help either. I don't have any options. A lawyer told me state insurance is allowed to do what they're doing to us. Because Salias is on state insurance, they're allowed to do what they're doing because we didn't get him up to date on vaccines within a certain time frame. That time frame was his 1 year checkup which is when all this insurance backdating started. On his 1 year appointment, we had it out with Salias pediatrician when she said we need to get him up to date on vaccines after pushing them off for so long. I kept pushing them off because of Salias' seizures and the mass in his throat that causes him to suffocate when it overfills with blood from too much pressure. She was persistent and at his 1+year I told her it's just hard to trust vaccines given they tried to force the Covid-19 vaccines on the child chart and doctors would still push it despite the risks of it just to get their kickbacks from insurance companies and that I hoped RFK Jr would put a stop to all of that. By the end of that appointment she told me Salias was not welcome back to her clinic for not getting up to date on his shots and within a few days after that, the state insurance company started back charging us, for even his BIRTH. For the fist 4 moths of his life, he spent a WEEK overnight in the hospital due to his breathing issues. That was very expensive, but when now back charged with all those, we paid it so we could continue seeing the ENT at Nationwide Children's Hospital specialists we needed for Salias. The state insurance company views Salias as a financial liability for not being vaccinated not just to them, but now to OTHER children he said because they view vaccines as the greatest medical achievement of the 20th century. He said state insurance companies are ALLOWED to do this. Private insurance companies or insurance companies provided through employment, are not. This is how the state strong arms parents into vaccinations, especially for public schooling. State insurance feeds into public schooling which ensures vaccine charts remain full which means autoimmune issues and Big Pharma customers for life. A huge potion of destroying the middle class gets people onto state insurance and into public schooling to expand their profit margins. I'M PRETTY SURE in the 90s if you didn't fully vaccinate your child, CPS could tale your children for "neglect." It's the insurance company who are the ones giving kickbacks to doctors for vaccines dictating future policies. My son Salias’s Health Journey:

Bridgett Fertig

60,000 views • 1 month ago

The man who wrote the essay that started the entire AI boom just got DESTROYED by it. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Bank of America teamed up to liquidate their own client overnight. Leopold Aschenbrenner left OpenAI in 2024 and published an essay called "Situational Awareness" arguing that AGI was arriving before the decade was out, and that whoever owned the compute would own everything after it. Silicon Valley read it and started spending. Then he raised a fund named after the essay and bet on his own thesis with borrowed money. The numbers he put up were the best on Wall Street: He started with roughly $225 million in late 2024. Patrick and John Collison wrote checks. So did Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Jane Street. Through June 30 of this year the fund was up 439% net of fees, according to the investor letter the Financial Times reviewed. The firm had a handful of employees, and he had no prior record managing anyone's money. It also ran leverage reported as high as 4x. For every dollar of his own capital he borrowed three or four more, then bought the physical guts of the AI buildout. He owned Micron, SanDisk, CoreWeave, Nebius, and SK Hynix. In July every one of those names fell somewhere between 27% and 54%. The Kospi, home to SK Hynix, lost about a third of its value. His collateral and his position were the same thing. The stocks fell, the loans against them came due, and selling to cover those loans pushed the stocks down again. The fund finished July down 67%. But the UGLY part happened in the six days before that... On July 24 he wrote to his investors and called the selloff some of the most attractive opportunities since early 2025. He invited them to commit fresh capital, with a deadline of August 1. That deadline is today. Six days after asking for more money, he was margin called by Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America. He spent Wednesday trying to sell anything that would move. Millennium looked at the positions and passed. Jane Street looked and passed, and Jane Street was an investor in his own fund. Late that night he agreed to sell $3.5 billion of his Anthropic shares to a group led by Greenoaks and Sequoia Capital. The Collison brothers sat in his offices while he negotiated past midnight. Then Ken Griffin called... Before Thursday's open, Citadel bought the bulk of the public portfolio at more than 10% below market value. The same prime brokers squeezing him for cash, Goldman, JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citigroup, helped arrange the trade that bailed him out. He used Griffin's money to pay off his lenders. And Thursday morning he walked away from the Anthropic deal. So he sold every asset that had a public price, at a discount, and kept the one asset that gets valued by whatever the last funding round said it was worth. The fund survived with about $10 billion. The Anthropic stake inside it is carried at $5 billion, off a May round that valued the company at $965 billion. No open market has ever tested that number. Anthropic could list as soon as October, and Aschenbrenner is now running a fund whose value rests almost entirely on that one line. His letter to investors blamed short sellers. What happens next: The fund is still up roughly 80% for the year, which is why half of finance spent the weekend defending him. But the other half noticed that a manager with no prior fund record ran a 4x levered book into the most telegraphed drawdown of the cycle and had to hand the whole thing to Ken Griffin before sunrise. The public book got a real price on Thursday morning. The private mark is still waiting for October. What do you think?

The man who wrote the essay that started the entire AI boom just got DESTROYED by it. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Bank of America teamed up to liquidate their own client overnight. Leopold Aschenbrenner left OpenAI in 2024 and published an essay called "Situational Awareness" arguing that AGI was arriving before the decade was out, and that whoever owned the compute would own everything after it. Silicon Valley read it and started spending. Then he raised a fund named after the essay and bet on his own thesis with borrowed money. The numbers he put up were the best on Wall Street: He started with roughly $225 million in late 2024. Patrick and John Collison wrote checks. So did Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Jane Street. Through June 30 of this year the fund was up 439% net of fees, according to the investor letter the Financial Times reviewed. The firm had a handful of employees, and he had no prior record managing anyone's money. It also ran leverage reported as high as 4x. For every dollar of his own capital he borrowed three or four more, then bought the physical guts of the AI buildout. He owned Micron, SanDisk, CoreWeave, Nebius, and SK Hynix. In July every one of those names fell somewhere between 27% and 54%. The Kospi, home to SK Hynix, lost about a third of its value. His collateral and his position were the same thing. The stocks fell, the loans against them came due, and selling to cover those loans pushed the stocks down again. The fund finished July down 67%. But the UGLY part happened in the six days before that... On July 24 he wrote to his investors and called the selloff some of the most attractive opportunities since early 2025. He invited them to commit fresh capital, with a deadline of August 1. That deadline is today. Six days after asking for more money, he was margin called by Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America. He spent Wednesday trying to sell anything that would move. Millennium looked at the positions and passed. Jane Street looked and passed, and Jane Street was an investor in his own fund. Late that night he agreed to sell $3.5 billion of his Anthropic shares to a group led by Greenoaks and Sequoia Capital. The Collison brothers sat in his offices while he negotiated past midnight. Then Ken Griffin called... Before Thursday's open, Citadel bought the bulk of the public portfolio at more than 10% below market value. The same prime brokers squeezing him for cash, Goldman, JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citigroup, helped arrange the trade that bailed him out. He used Griffin's money to pay off his lenders. And Thursday morning he walked away from the Anthropic deal. So he sold every asset that had a public price, at a discount, and kept the one asset that gets valued by whatever the last funding round said it was worth. The fund survived with about $10 billion. The Anthropic stake inside it is carried at $5 billion, off a May round that valued the company at $965 billion. No open market has ever tested that number. Anthropic could list as soon as October, and Aschenbrenner is now running a fund whose value rests almost entirely on that one line. His letter to investors blamed short sellers. What happens next: The fund is still up roughly 80% for the year, which is why half of finance spent the weekend defending him. But the other half noticed that a manager with no prior fund record ran a 4x levered book into the most telegraphed drawdown of the cycle and had to hand the whole thing to Ken Griffin before sunrise. The public book got a real price on Thursday morning. The private mark is still waiting for October. What do you think?

Ricardo

40,001 views • 25 days ago

Dr. Elizabeth Mumper described how much kickback money from INSURANCE COMPANIES she refused to receive by not forcing vaccines on children. I'm pretty sure pushing back against this corrupt system as a mother for my son Salias is what got me into my financial battle with them. Being very vocal that I was MAGA / MAHA likely didn't help either. I don't have any options. A lawyer told me state insurance is allowed to do what they're doing to us. Because Salias is on state insurance, they're allowed to do what they're doing because we didn't get him up to date on vaccines within a certain time frame. That time frame was his 1 year checkup which is when all this insurance backdating started. On his 1 year appointment, we had it out with Salias pediatrician when she said we need to get him up to date on vaccines after pushing them off for so long. I kept pushing them off because of Salias' seizures and the mass in his throat that causes him to suffocate when it overfills with blood from too much pressure. She was persistent and at his 1+year I told her it's just hard to trust vaccines given they tried to force the Covid-19 vaccines on the child chart and doctors would still push it despite the risks of it just to get their kickbacks from insurance companies and that I hoped RFK Jr would put a stop to all of that. By the end of that appointment she told me Salias was not welcome back to her clinic for not getting up to date on his shots and within a few days after that, the state insurance company started back charging us, for even his BIRTH. For the fist 4 moths of his life, he spent a WEEK overnight in the hospital due to his breathing issues. That was very expensive, but when now back charged with all those, we paid it so we could continue seeing the ENT at Nationwide Children's Hospital specialists we needed for Salias. The state insurance company views Salias as a financial liability for not being vaccinated not just to them, but now to OTHER children he said because they view vaccines as the greatest medical achievement of the 20th century. He said state insurance companies are ALLOWED to do this. Private insurance companies or insurance companies provided through employment, are not. This is how the state strong arms parents into vaccinations, especially for public schooling. State insurance feeds into public schooling which ensures vaccine charts remain full which means autoimmune issues and Big Pharma customers for life. A huge potion of destroying the middle class gets people onto state insurance and into public schooling to expand their profit margins. I'M PRETTY SURE in the 90s if you didn't fully vaccinate your child, CPS could tale your children for "neglect." It's the insurance company who are the ones giving kickbacks to doctors for vaccines dictating future policies. My son Salias’s Health Journey:

Dr. Elizabeth Mumper described how much kickback money from INSURANCE COMPANIES she refused to receive by not forcing vaccines on children. I'm pretty sure pushing back against this corrupt system as a mother for my son Salias is what got me into my financial battle with them. Being very vocal that I was MAGA / MAHA likely didn't help either. I don't have any options. A lawyer told me state insurance is allowed to do what they're doing to us. Because Salias is on state insurance, they're allowed to do what they're doing because we didn't get him up to date on vaccines within a certain time frame. That time frame was his 1 year checkup which is when all this insurance backdating started. On his 1 year appointment, we had it out with Salias pediatrician when she said we need to get him up to date on vaccines after pushing them off for so long. I kept pushing them off because of Salias' seizures and the mass in his throat that causes him to suffocate when it overfills with blood from too much pressure. She was persistent and at his 1+year I told her it's just hard to trust vaccines given they tried to force the Covid-19 vaccines on the child chart and doctors would still push it despite the risks of it just to get their kickbacks from insurance companies and that I hoped RFK Jr would put a stop to all of that. By the end of that appointment she told me Salias was not welcome back to her clinic for not getting up to date on his shots and within a few days after that, the state insurance company started back charging us, for even his BIRTH. For the fist 4 moths of his life, he spent a WEEK overnight in the hospital due to his breathing issues. That was very expensive, but when now back charged with all those, we paid it so we could continue seeing the ENT at Nationwide Children's Hospital specialists we needed for Salias. The state insurance company views Salias as a financial liability for not being vaccinated not just to them, but now to OTHER children he said because they view vaccines as the greatest medical achievement of the 20th century. He said state insurance companies are ALLOWED to do this. Private insurance companies or insurance companies provided through employment, are not. This is how the state strong arms parents into vaccinations, especially for public schooling. State insurance feeds into public schooling which ensures vaccine charts remain full which means autoimmune issues and Big Pharma customers for life. A huge potion of destroying the middle class gets people onto state insurance and into public schooling to expand their profit margins. I'M PRETTY SURE in the 90s if you didn't fully vaccinate your child, CPS could tale your children for "neglect." It's the insurance company who are the ones giving kickbacks to doctors for vaccines dictating future policies. My son Salias’s Health Journey:

Bridgett Fertig

33,110 views • 1 month ago