Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Justice Kavanaugh asks why the president may not be able to issue tariffs but can set trade embargoes, which sets off a debate among the justices and a series of questions about presidential power.

cspan's profile picture

CSPAN

2,037,088 subscribers

203,874 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Justice Kavanaugh on Presidential Power: "If this were set as a precedent it seems...what goes around comes around, all the current president's appointees would likely be removed for cause on January 20, 2029 if there's a Democrat president...then we're really at-will removal."
7:47

Justice Kavanaugh on Presidential Power: "If this were set as a precedent it seems...what goes around comes around, all the current president's appointees would likely be removed for cause on January 20, 2029 if there's a Democrat president...then we're really at-will removal."

CSPAN

691,411 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Justice Kavanaugh: "I hate, hate that a kid who wants to play sports might not be able to play sports. Hate that. But it's kind of a zero sum game for a lot of teams. Someone who tries out and makes it, who is a transgender girl...will bump someone else."
5:07

Justice Kavanaugh: "I hate, hate that a kid who wants to play sports might not be able to play sports. Hate that. But it's kind of a zero sum game for a lot of teams. Someone who tries out and makes it, who is a transgender girl...will bump someone else."

CSPAN

238,876 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Justice Kavanaugh appears to support the Trump administration's case to extend Presidential powers. Kavanaugh: "Independent agencies are not accountable to the people. They're not elected as Congress and the President are, and are exercising massive power over individual liberty and billion dollar industries, whether it's the FCC or the FTC."
1:39

BREAKING: Justice Kavanaugh appears to support the Trump administration's case to extend Presidential powers. Kavanaugh: "Independent agencies are not accountable to the people. They're not elected as Congress and the President are, and are exercising massive power over individual liberty and billion dollar industries, whether it's the FCC or the FTC."

DeVory Darkins

74,275 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

.President Donald J. Trump: "You gotta do what's right for the Constitution. That's why I respect, so much, Justices Thomas, and Alito, Kavanaugh — because they not only dissented, their dissent is so strong... as Justice Kavanaugh said... you have other ways you can go."
0:50

.President Donald J. Trump: "You gotta do what's right for the Constitution. That's why I respect, so much, Justices Thomas, and Alito, Kavanaugh — because they not only dissented, their dissent is so strong... as Justice Kavanaugh said... you have other ways you can go."

Rapid Response 47

62,359 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.Karl Rove says "it would be a mistake" if the GOP nominates JD Vance instead of holding an open primary in 2028 because presidential elections are about "change" and to not "be a clone" of a past president.
3:39

.Karl Rove says "it would be a mistake" if the GOP nominates JD Vance instead of holding an open primary in 2028 because presidential elections are about "change" and to not "be a clone" of a past president.

CSPAN

23,856 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Justice Alito asks hypothetical questions about removing a Fed Governor for sexual misconduct or admiration for Hitler or the KKK.
4:55

Justice Alito asks hypothetical questions about removing a Fed Governor for sexual misconduct or admiration for Hitler or the KKK.

CSPAN

26,801 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Trump responded with fury to a Supreme Court ruling that he did not have the power to unilaterally set tariffs on imports, denigrating individual justices as he vowed to wield a more restrictive law to continue his global trade war
2:07

Trump responded with fury to a Supreme Court ruling that he did not have the power to unilaterally set tariffs on imports, denigrating individual justices as he vowed to wield a more restrictive law to continue his global trade war

Reuters

83,754 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

"Should Trump be there on the debate stage?" Robert Costa asks New Hampshire Chris Sununu on the first 2024 GOP presidential debate. Sununu: "Of course. You cannot stand in front of America and say, 'I'm a fighter, but I'm going to wimp out and not get on a debate stage.'"
1:27

"Should Trump be there on the debate stage?" Robert Costa asks New Hampshire Chris Sununu on the first 2024 GOP presidential debate. Sununu: "Of course. You cannot stand in front of America and say, 'I'm a fighter, but I'm going to wimp out and not get on a debate stage.'"

CBS News

45,329 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Justice Kagan on how criticism from political figures including President Trump on the court impacts the security of the justices: "When political figures of any stripe are trying to intimidate judges and justices... that's where we really have crossed the line."
2:02

Justice Kagan on how criticism from political figures including President Trump on the court impacts the security of the justices: "When political figures of any stripe are trying to intimidate judges and justices... that's where we really have crossed the line."

CSPAN

29,908 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Lee on Epstein Files: We’re not going to stop “bitching” about this. Why is somebody who has a lot of money able to buy this much protection? Why should you be able to get away with heinous crimes like this if you’re a president, a prince, or a CEO? People are tired of this country having one set of rules for some folks and another set for others. And that is fundamentally why this is the one issue that Trump has not been able to make disappear.
0:38

Lee on Epstein Files: We’re not going to stop “bitching” about this. Why is somebody who has a lot of money able to buy this much protection? Why should you be able to get away with heinous crimes like this if you’re a president, a prince, or a CEO? People are tired of this country having one set of rules for some folks and another set for others. And that is fundamentally why this is the one issue that Trump has not been able to make disappear.

Acyn

78,774 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Chrissy Houlahan: "Can we just have a conversation about the country and the nation and not about parties?" Secretary Hegseth: "The Democrat Party wanted to socially engineer the Department of War—" Houlahan: "Clearly, you're not able to have that conversation."
0:26

.Chrissy Houlahan: "Can we just have a conversation about the country and the nation and not about parties?" Secretary Hegseth: "The Democrat Party wanted to socially engineer the Department of War—" Houlahan: "Clearly, you're not able to have that conversation."

CSPAN

569,443 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court (6–3) just ruled that President Trump lacks authority under the IEEPA to impose certain tariffs. Chief Justice John Roberts joined by Gorsuch and Barrett invoked the “Major Questions Doctrine.” But here’s what the headlines won’t tell you: Justice Brett Kavanaugh — joined by Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito — argued that the plain meaning of “regulate importation” absolutely includes tariffs. And Trump immediately pivoted to Section 232, Section 301, and Section 122 authority — imposing a new 10% global tariff. This isn’t the end of the tariff fight. It may be the beginning of a stronger one. Separation of powers showdown incoming.
19:06

The Supreme Court (6–3) just ruled that President Trump lacks authority under the IEEPA to impose certain tariffs. Chief Justice John Roberts joined by Gorsuch and Barrett invoked the “Major Questions Doctrine.” But here’s what the headlines won’t tell you: Justice Brett Kavanaugh — joined by Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito — argued that the plain meaning of “regulate importation” absolutely includes tariffs. And Trump immediately pivoted to Section 232, Section 301, and Section 122 authority — imposing a new 10% global tariff. This isn’t the end of the tariff fight. It may be the beginning of a stronger one. Separation of powers showdown incoming.

Andrew Branca Show

105,598 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Harris and Trump may not have mentioned crypto during the presidential debate. But crypto folk had plenty to say about Tuesday's contest. Here's a sampling. An opinion:
0:57

Harris and Trump may not have mentioned crypto during the presidential debate. But crypto folk had plenty to say about Tuesday's contest. Here's a sampling. An opinion:

CoinDesk

21,098 просмотров • 2 лет назад

JUST IN: The Supreme Court is requesting more security amid a surge in left-wing political violence. SCOTUS Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Clarence Thomas have been subject to de*th threats over their court rulings. • Justice Clarence Thomas reported a security threat in February 2026 • Justice Amy Coney Barrett's life was endangered by a "swatting" attack in May 2026 • Justice Brett Kavanaugh was threatened by a serious assassinat*on attempt in June 2022 Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan testified on this issue—the first such congressional appearance by sitting justices since 2019. They cited radical protests, the Kavanaugh assassinat*on attempt, and ongoing threats. The Supreme Court is seeking $14.6 million more for security in the 2027 budget.
1:11

JUST IN: The Supreme Court is requesting more security amid a surge in left-wing political violence. SCOTUS Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Clarence Thomas have been subject to de*th threats over their court rulings. • Justice Clarence Thomas reported a security threat in February 2026 • Justice Amy Coney Barrett's life was endangered by a "swatting" attack in May 2026 • Justice Brett Kavanaugh was threatened by a serious assassinat*on attempt in June 2022 Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan testified on this issue—the first such congressional appearance by sitting justices since 2019. They cited radical protests, the Kavanaugh assassinat*on attempt, and ongoing threats. The Supreme Court is seeking $14.6 million more for security in the 2027 budget.

Kyle Becker

20,125 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад