Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“Knots is BIP 110. It’s going to enforce those as consensus rules. If there are no blocks and the chain stalls out because miners ignore it then there will be a proof of work change… I'm very sorry to the miners that have supported BIP 110.” — Bitcoin Mechanic,...

WalkerAmerica's profile picture

Walker⚡️

83,845 subscribers

205,761 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

In this video Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 talks how BIP110 chain would consider a Proof of Work change in case very little hashrate shows up. Curious if Dathon Ohm / BIP-110 is considering adding this to the BIP in case no blocks are found in the first 24 to 48 hours or it's something that's not concerning.
1:15

In this video Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 talks how BIP110 chain would consider a Proof of Work change in case very little hashrate shows up. Curious if Dathon Ohm / BIP-110 is considering adding this to the BIP in case no blocks are found in the first 24 to 48 hours or it's something that's not concerning.

zender ⚔️

22,776 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

"If that means I'm on some dead isolated chain where people are talking about proof of work changes, I don't care” - Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 ​This is what everyone has been warning about. If you run BIP110, there is a risk you will fork yourself off the network. It will knot be Bitcoin
0:23

"If that means I'm on some dead isolated chain where people are talking about proof of work changes, I don't care” - Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 ​This is what everyone has been warning about. If you run BIP110, there is a risk you will fork yourself off the network. It will knot be Bitcoin

James Viggiano

61,860 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A change to consensus rules with no consensus. The BIP-110 debate is not about spam, it is about the dangerously low bar now set for pushing consensus changes into Bitcoin.
1:24

A change to consensus rules with no consensus. The BIP-110 debate is not about spam, it is about the dangerously low bar now set for pushing consensus changes into Bitcoin.

JAN3

12,459 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MUST WATCH 🚨 "If BIP-110 fails, Bitcoin will have had its soul divorced from it. That will spell the end." Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 on the spam war, Core gone rogue, and who really runs Bitcoin. The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #283: Inside Bitcoin's Civil War is out now.
1:30

MUST WATCH 🚨 "If BIP-110 fails, Bitcoin will have had its soul divorced from it. That will spell the end." Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 on the spam war, Core gone rogue, and who really runs Bitcoin. The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #283: Inside Bitcoin's Civil War is out now.

Cedric Youngelman ⚡️

13,369 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

BIP-110 could trigger a Bitcoin chain split, hard fork, and even a proof-of-work change. Samson Mow says only 1–2% of hash rate is currently supporting it and calls the potential outcome a “big, juicy nothing burger.” Rustin and Samson break down the BIP-110 controversy and what could happen next. 👇
21:55

BIP-110 could trigger a Bitcoin chain split, hard fork, and even a proof-of-work change. Samson Mow says only 1–2% of hash rate is currently supporting it and calls the potential outcome a “big, juicy nothing burger.” Rustin and Samson break down the BIP-110 controversy and what could happen next. 👇

Simply Bitcoin

39,329 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Hodlonaut on the pressure campaign to make him drop BIP-110: "The lengths people have gone to, to intimidate me out of supporting it. My DMs are full of it. People reaching out: what are you doing with this BIP-110 support? Your reputation is going to hell. It starts with friendly nudging, then threats. And then, when they realize I'm actually tying myself to the mast, it's just straight hostility and smearing. But I don't care what people I don't respect say about me. I don't want any standing or position among people who don't share my principles. I'm very much supporting BIP-110." hodlonaut on The The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #286.
0:47

Hodlonaut on the pressure campaign to make him drop BIP-110: "The lengths people have gone to, to intimidate me out of supporting it. My DMs are full of it. People reaching out: what are you doing with this BIP-110 support? Your reputation is going to hell. It starts with friendly nudging, then threats. And then, when they realize I'm actually tying myself to the mast, it's just straight hostility and smearing. But I don't care what people I don't respect say about me. I don't want any standing or position among people who don't share my principles. I'm very much supporting BIP-110." hodlonaut on The The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #286.

Cedric Youngelman ⚡️

30,462 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mechanic may have called me a vagina and insinuated that sentiment analysis is irrelevant for what happens with BIP-110... but he's wrong. I shared this data not because I'm looking to spark controversy, but because there is a lot of Bitcoin at stake here and emotion can cause people to make poor decisions. This is only amplified when we all live inside of our own little algorithmic bubbles. Which is why this kind of analysis actually CAN give us clarity about what will happen on August 8th through a more human/social lens. TLDR for people that didn't read the piece is that BIP-110 supporters are broadly: 1) Getting angrier and more disapproving the further this debate rages on. 2) Talking with more hedging language, compared to those against BIP-110 who are growing more convicted. 3) Being fed higher rates of BIP-110 content by the algorithm, causing the debate to appear to have a larger mindshare then it actually does. 4) Getting LESS excited the closer we get to the activation date (which was probably the most unexpected and counterintuitive finding IMO). Again, I wish everyone the best as this debate rages on, but calling me names isn't going to stop me from sharing my findings ✌️
0:52

Mechanic may have called me a vagina and insinuated that sentiment analysis is irrelevant for what happens with BIP-110... but he's wrong. I shared this data not because I'm looking to spark controversy, but because there is a lot of Bitcoin at stake here and emotion can cause people to make poor decisions. This is only amplified when we all live inside of our own little algorithmic bubbles. Which is why this kind of analysis actually CAN give us clarity about what will happen on August 8th through a more human/social lens. TLDR for people that didn't read the piece is that BIP-110 supporters are broadly: 1) Getting angrier and more disapproving the further this debate rages on. 2) Talking with more hedging language, compared to those against BIP-110 who are growing more convicted. 3) Being fed higher rates of BIP-110 content by the algorithm, causing the debate to appear to have a larger mindshare then it actually does. 4) Getting LESS excited the closer we get to the activation date (which was probably the most unexpected and counterintuitive finding IMO). Again, I wish everyone the best as this debate rages on, but calling me names isn't going to stop me from sharing my findings ✌️

Michael Sullivan

16,649 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The biggest damage from BIP-110 failing may have nothing to do with BIP-110. Puncher75 - BIP-110 said the important part out loud on the The Bitcoin Edge Podcast. The people who saw an attack coming and were willing to stand up when it was unpopular are now being treated like the problem. "Fork off" "Leave Bitcoin" "Bitcoin won" That is a hell of a way to treat people who have been fighting for Bitcoin for years and were willing to stand up again when they thought it mattered. Maybe you think they were wrong... But treating the people most willing to defend Bitcoin like they're no longer welcome here may be the most damaging legacy of this temporary soft fork failing.
0:56

The biggest damage from BIP-110 failing may have nothing to do with BIP-110. Puncher75 - BIP-110 said the important part out loud on the The Bitcoin Edge Podcast. The people who saw an attack coming and were willing to stand up when it was unpopular are now being treated like the problem. "Fork off" "Leave Bitcoin" "Bitcoin won" That is a hell of a way to treat people who have been fighting for Bitcoin for years and were willing to stand up again when they thought it mattered. Maybe you think they were wrong... But treating the people most willing to defend Bitcoin like they're no longer welcome here may be the most damaging legacy of this temporary soft fork failing.

Shaun

20,526 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Short clip and followup yesterday from the studio. When I said Core V30 would increase the attack surface and threat sector to Bitcoin I was attacked. Now that V30 failed-and resulted in loss of Bitcoin for some-where are those mouthpieces for Core? Lopp. Calle. Shinobi. Back. Livera. Remember the "adults in the room" telling us you couldn't trust Knots? Or Luke, or Mechanic. Now, V30 has been pulled. Failed. 200 developers and yet it released with numerous bugs. One fatal to some legacy wallets. Luke Dashjr Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 The Bitcoin Boomers
2:55

Short clip and followup yesterday from the studio. When I said Core V30 would increase the attack surface and threat sector to Bitcoin I was attacked. Now that V30 failed-and resulted in loss of Bitcoin for some-where are those mouthpieces for Core? Lopp. Calle. Shinobi. Back. Livera. Remember the "adults in the room" telling us you couldn't trust Knots? Or Luke, or Mechanic. Now, V30 has been pulled. Failed. 200 developers and yet it released with numerous bugs. One fatal to some legacy wallets. Luke Dashjr Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 The Bitcoin Boomers

George Bodine

17,628 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Daniel Buchner: Why BIP 110 Cannot Stop Bitcoin Spam | SLP758 Daniel Ƀrrr dismantles the case for BIP 110, showing that embedding data in public keys and hashes makes consensus-level spam filters ineffective from day one. Timestamps: 01:31 — Locusts Flock to Bitcoin's Last Pasture 03:32 — Core Policy Tweaks Aren't Consensus Rules 08:44 — Spam Hides in Any Public Key or Hash 11:12 — Spammers Adapt in a Day, Consensus Can't 14:59 — BIP110 Debate Exposes Major Inconsistency 20:44 — Why the House Analogy Totally Fails 25:25 — Nodes Get Cheaper Even With Max Spam 28:08 — Set Tolerances Assuming Worst Case 30:35 — Legal Liability for Bad Chain Data 33:04 — Filter Regime Creates Government Backdoor 35:13 — BIP 110 Risks Centralizing Dev Around Luke 37:33 — Economic Incentives Trump 'Good Guy' Miners 39:03 — Economic Nodes Outweigh Basement Node Runners 43:49 — BIP 110 Has Near-Zero Economic Support 48:43 — Game Theory? 55:52 — BIP 110 Fork Dies With a Whimper
57:01

Daniel Buchner: Why BIP 110 Cannot Stop Bitcoin Spam | SLP758 Daniel Ƀrrr dismantles the case for BIP 110, showing that embedding data in public keys and hashes makes consensus-level spam filters ineffective from day one. Timestamps: 01:31 — Locusts Flock to Bitcoin's Last Pasture 03:32 — Core Policy Tweaks Aren't Consensus Rules 08:44 — Spam Hides in Any Public Key or Hash 11:12 — Spammers Adapt in a Day, Consensus Can't 14:59 — BIP110 Debate Exposes Major Inconsistency 20:44 — Why the House Analogy Totally Fails 25:25 — Nodes Get Cheaper Even With Max Spam 28:08 — Set Tolerances Assuming Worst Case 30:35 — Legal Liability for Bad Chain Data 33:04 — Filter Regime Creates Government Backdoor 35:13 — BIP 110 Risks Centralizing Dev Around Luke 37:33 — Economic Incentives Trump 'Good Guy' Miners 39:03 — Economic Nodes Outweigh Basement Node Runners 43:49 — BIP 110 Has Near-Zero Economic Support 48:43 — Game Theory? 55:52 — BIP 110 Fork Dies With a Whimper

Stephan Livera

14,580 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Kent State's Rob Senderoff on eligibility chaos 👀 "College basketball should be able to develop a set of rules, and whatever those rules are, that's the rules. There is no, 'I'm going to a judge to change the rules because it doesn't work for me'" 🎥:
1:13

Kent State's Rob Senderoff on eligibility chaos 👀 "College basketball should be able to develop a set of rules, and whatever those rules are, that's the rules. There is no, 'I'm going to a judge to change the rules because it doesn't work for me'" 🎥:

The Field of 68

48,496 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"What matters isn't BIP 110 ... what people really care about isn't spam ... it's can the Bitcoin network get its shit together to defend against quantum" Dave on what people are really worried about beyond the BIP 110 debate "Where is the value, where are people looking? The new narrative on Ethereum is it's a safer network and it'll be quantum resistant and faster" "The narrative on Bitcoin is there's a BIP 110 debate. At the end of the day, and I'm oversimplifying, what matters isn't BIP 110, what matters is the process" "Can the Bitcoin network get its shit together to defend against quantum, and can they defend against theoretical attacks like the one that Duke professor you quoted [51% attack with short perps position] last week talked about"
1:08

"What matters isn't BIP 110 ... what people really care about isn't spam ... it's can the Bitcoin network get its shit together to defend against quantum" Dave on what people are really worried about beyond the BIP 110 debate "Where is the value, where are people looking? The new narrative on Ethereum is it's a safer network and it'll be quantum resistant and faster" "The narrative on Bitcoin is there's a BIP 110 debate. At the end of the day, and I'm oversimplifying, what matters isn't BIP 110, what matters is the process" "Can the Bitcoin network get its shit together to defend against quantum, and can they defend against theoretical attacks like the one that Duke professor you quoted [51% attack with short perps position] last week talked about"

The Wolf Of All Streets

41,038 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Bitcoin OG Tone Vays gives his full unfiltered take on the BIP-110 controversy: "People have been convinced that just because you're able to spin up a node, that somehow you should be in control of the Bitcoin network, and that's a very dangerous precedent."
47:40

Bitcoin OG Tone Vays gives his full unfiltered take on the BIP-110 controversy: "People have been convinced that just because you're able to spin up a node, that somehow you should be in control of the Bitcoin network, and that's a very dangerous precedent."

Simply Bitcoin

64,774 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Bitcoin RBF (Replace By Fee) Tutorial [Reposted] This tutorial is relevant today because RBF will probably be the most accessible way to split your UTXOs in the event of a sustained BIP-110 chain split. I'll make a new tutorial soon showing how to do that.
17:56

Bitcoin RBF (Replace By Fee) Tutorial [Reposted] This tutorial is relevant today because RBF will probably be the most accessible way to split your UTXOs in the event of a sustained BIP-110 chain split. I'll make a new tutorial soon showing how to do that.

Wicked

24,256 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Centralized #Bitcoin miners will always follow the path of least resistance. If the State tells them to do something they are going to do it. They don't want to be responsible for leading Bitcoin because they have executives, board members, and investors who can be held to some account if a State does not like what they are doing. An appropriately functioning network of decentralized nodes provides both leadership to the miners as well as cover from the encroachment of the State. If the miners are doing something the State doesn't like then they can pass the buck to the bitcoiners who run nodes that set and enforce the rules of the network. However, if bitcoiners defer their responsibilities to the top 5 mining nodes then they have essentially surrendered the network to the State. In August, the path of least resistance for the miners will be to flip the bit and activate BIP110. You can help provide the leadership that gets them to do what they need to do by running BIP110 on your node and putting some hash behind it. Learn why and how here: &
0:47

Centralized #Bitcoin miners will always follow the path of least resistance. If the State tells them to do something they are going to do it. They don't want to be responsible for leading Bitcoin because they have executives, board members, and investors who can be held to some account if a State does not like what they are doing. An appropriately functioning network of decentralized nodes provides both leadership to the miners as well as cover from the encroachment of the State. If the miners are doing something the State doesn't like then they can pass the buck to the bitcoiners who run nodes that set and enforce the rules of the network. However, if bitcoiners defer their responsibilities to the top 5 mining nodes then they have essentially surrendered the network to the State. In August, the path of least resistance for the miners will be to flip the bit and activate BIP110. You can help provide the leadership that gets them to do what they need to do by running BIP110 on your node and putting some hash behind it. Learn why and how here: &

Jim | RDTS | Bitcoin, not jpegs

14,448 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We have absolutely no idea what kind of chaos is going to ensue if BIP-110 gets pushed through without consensus. If the market sides against the restrictive rules, we are left with a smaller, weaker monetary Bitcoin while the "spam-enabling" version wins all the institutional money. I pulled this clip from my recent chat with Luke de Wolf because it highlights the true stakes of this governance debate. Check it out here or catch the whole of discussion below.
5:33

We have absolutely no idea what kind of chaos is going to ensue if BIP-110 gets pushed through without consensus. If the market sides against the restrictive rules, we are left with a smaller, weaker monetary Bitcoin while the "spam-enabling" version wins all the institutional money. I pulled this clip from my recent chat with Luke de Wolf because it highlights the true stakes of this governance debate. Check it out here or catch the whole of discussion below.

Guy Swann

37,049 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

We cannot call them illegal miners because there has been no fact-finding to that effect yet. In my view, I believe that, especially with the new regime that there are no illegal miners in Nigeria because the Ministry of Mines has mapped out almost all mining sites in the country and given certificates to the owners. So, what we should be looking at is: who is the owner of the mine? - Deji Adeyanju, Lawyer, speaking on Niger State miners' deaths #CTVMorningBrief
3:13

We cannot call them illegal miners because there has been no fact-finding to that effect yet. In my view, I believe that, especially with the new regime that there are no illegal miners in Nigeria because the Ministry of Mines has mapped out almost all mining sites in the country and given certificates to the owners. So, what we should be looking at is: who is the owner of the mine? - Deji Adeyanju, Lawyer, speaking on Niger State miners' deaths #CTVMorningBrief

Channels Television

96,163 просмотров • 12 дней назад

Bitcoin Mechanic on who actually controls Bitcoin: "Miners are employees of the network. That's the end of it. The nodes are the boss. People are very worried about what miners think, and not at all worried about what nodes think. But nodes are more important. They're higher up in the hierarchy. When miners get out of line, it's nodes that give them a slap. This was the fork wars. We let miners have a say in whether we got SegWit, and they said no. So we fought a war over it, we won, and we slapped the miners and put them back in their place. If miners are in control, if devs are in control, it just turns into a shitcoin. The people in charge have to be the users running their own nodes." Hardfork Mechanic on The The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #198.
2:22

Bitcoin Mechanic on who actually controls Bitcoin: "Miners are employees of the network. That's the end of it. The nodes are the boss. People are very worried about what miners think, and not at all worried about what nodes think. But nodes are more important. They're higher up in the hierarchy. When miners get out of line, it's nodes that give them a slap. This was the fork wars. We let miners have a say in whether we got SegWit, and they said no. So we fought a war over it, we won, and we slapped the miners and put them back in their place. If miners are in control, if devs are in control, it just turns into a shitcoin. The people in charge have to be the users running their own nodes." Hardfork Mechanic on The The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️ #198.

Cedric Youngelman ⚡️

11,296 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Tomorrow, independent developer Super Testnet comes on the show to share why he's proposing a User-Rejected Soft Fork for BIP 110 — and explores the different ways a potential 'soft fork war' could play out around BIP 110 in August. This episode is chockfull of soft-fork history, with insights into how changes to consensus have historically been executed and how these processes could shift going forward.
0:33

Tomorrow, independent developer Super Testnet comes on the show to share why he's proposing a User-Rejected Soft Fork for BIP 110 — and explores the different ways a potential 'soft fork war' could play out around BIP 110 in August. This episode is chockfull of soft-fork history, with insights into how changes to consensus have historically been executed and how these processes could shift going forward.

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

17,045 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

THE CREATOR OF ORDINALS SAYS BIP-110 IS DOOMED Casey Casey and Erin Redwing dive into the history and drama behind BIP-110, Bitcoin's controversial anti-spam filter proposal. This episode covers the origins of Bitcoin's spam debate, Luke Dashjr's decade-long anti-spam crusade, the rise of Ordinals, Inscriptions, and Runes, the Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots conflict, and a full technical breakdown of what BIP-110 actually does — and why it's doomed to fail. TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 2:11 Satoshi Dice and the origin of Luke Jr's anti-spam crusade 10:20 Meta-protocols arrive: Counterparty, OmniLayer, and Tether's origins on Bitcoin 11:56 The op_return byte limit history 18:41 Why Ethereum failed 28:51 Ordinals launch in Jan 2023 40:12 Insidious motivations behind anti-Ordinals backlash and the Swanfluencers 53:42 What BIP-110 actually is and does 1:00:43 BIP-110 signaling timeline and activation dates 1:08:16 Explaining the mining difficulty adjustment problem for a minority fork 1:21:00 Why BIP-110's filters are trivial to bypass (Ordinals and Runes survive regardless) 1:25:33 Final thoughts: why the whole community should log off and move on
1:32:49

THE CREATOR OF ORDINALS SAYS BIP-110 IS DOOMED Casey Casey and Erin Redwing dive into the history and drama behind BIP-110, Bitcoin's controversial anti-spam filter proposal. This episode covers the origins of Bitcoin's spam debate, Luke Dashjr's decade-long anti-spam crusade, the rise of Ordinals, Inscriptions, and Runes, the Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots conflict, and a full technical breakdown of what BIP-110 actually does — and why it's doomed to fail. TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro 2:11 Satoshi Dice and the origin of Luke Jr's anti-spam crusade 10:20 Meta-protocols arrive: Counterparty, OmniLayer, and Tether's origins on Bitcoin 11:56 The op_return byte limit history 18:41 Why Ethereum failed 28:51 Ordinals launch in Jan 2023 40:12 Insidious motivations behind anti-Ordinals backlash and the Swanfluencers 53:42 What BIP-110 actually is and does 1:00:43 BIP-110 signaling timeline and activation dates 1:08:16 Explaining the mining difficulty adjustment problem for a minority fork 1:21:00 Why BIP-110's filters are trivial to bypass (Ordinals and Runes survive regardless) 1:25:33 Final thoughts: why the whole community should log off and move on

Hell Money

145,941 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад