Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
⚡️ Leaderboard Rush: Fair Play Rules! ⚡️ To keep the competition fair and ensure equal conditions for all players, the following rules apply in Leaderboard Rush: 🚫 1. Rating manipulation is prohibited - Farming AP by going AFK or performing minimal actions in matches. - Collusive “throwing” of matches... show more
17,849 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
![“Something major is changing in the world right now and it's creeping into RuneScape." "[GPT bots] are already randomizing their stats and gear patterns, so it gets difficult for me to spot them now." “Not only did none of the players get suspicious, but the bot literally roasted the players and argued with them for a good 3 minutes without raising suspicion.” "This isn't the only tip off I've gotten about accounts having slightly strangely intelligent conversations within the last week.” “In the not too distant future, bots will be unidentifiable to players. But what if all of a sudden players don't know who is a bot and they're even friends with some of the bots? Unknowingly, bots kind of become somewhat of a positive externality. Players think the game is more populated than it is and find that the player base on average may even be more willing to help out as bots are programmed to break from their gold farming to do some humanlike interaction. So now, unknowingly, players actually like bots, which means JAGEX now likes bots. And as a for profit company, JAGEX actually starts to make their own bots to flood the RuneScape world with more players. It feels like the height of RuneScape in 2006. Many worlds are full, people are chatting. There are bots all over the place that act like cute noobs to give you that rush of dopamine from the nostalgia you've been being fed in not only a digital world but a fake reality of that digital world. There are thousands of fake bossing groups, fake clans, mini-games are full and everyone wants to be your friend. It takes 3 seconds to get a PVP fight whose result is pre-programmed slightly in your favor to keep your brain pumping with dopamine so that you renew your now $50 per month membership. Do you understand what I'm getting at? The nature of our reality is at stake. I'd totally be playing way more RuneScape and be purchasing way more memberships as long as JAGEX could keep tricking me that their bots are real players. Either governments will start regulating required disclosure of [AI] interaction both in video games and elsewhere online, meaning it's illegal for companies not to tell you you're talking to or playing with a nonhuman, or we're all going to be turned completely into dopamine drips.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1679846530105131008/ext_tw_video_thumb/1679787376166461440/pu/img/qQPqB2kg67zwtbdn.jpg)
![[DID YOU KNOW] Disobeying the South African Police Service National Instruction 5 of 2017 is a punishable offence in terms of disciplinary regulations. The new trend of posting pictures and video clips in uniform on various social media platforms, directly contravenes National Instruction 5 of 2017. According to Section 19(10) of National Instruction 5 of 2017 on Media Communication in the South African Police Service, the following rules must be adhered to: No member may, on their own accord, represent the SAPS on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc., either on their own social media accounts or those belonging to the SAPS. No member may use a profile picture of themselves in uniform or display any police insignia, badges, or logos as their avatar on their private social media accounts. Only with the approval of the Head of Corporate Communication and Liaison may a social media profile be set up for or on behalf of the SAPS on any social network. Accordingly, no station, cluster, unit, or office of the SAPS is permitted to have a social media profile or account without approval. These regulations ensure that all members execute their duties professionally within the confines of the law. Any employee who transgresses in any form or manner will be subjected to the processes of the applicable Disciplinary Regulations. All SAPS members are required to subscribe to the SAPS Code of Conduct and Dress Code and adhere to them when performing their daily duties and interacting with the public. Your efficiency, professionalism, integrity, respect, and empathy are vital to service delivery and the SAPS’s reputation, which in turn influences the community's trust in their police service.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2045812610138841193/amplify_video_thumb/2045812511308718081/img/XYoCZE-l9LKHbtzz.jpg)
![🚨BARON COLEMAN JUST TORCHED Erika Kirk & Blake Neff for flagrantly VIOLATING their Gag Order! Baron doesn't just talk! No, he demolishes Blake Neff. ✅Locks in Erika & Blake's gag order. ✅Applies rule 3.6 applies to THEM. ✅Drops UNDENIABLE VIDEO EVIDENCE of Blake doing it on camera. Rule 3.6 would typically only apply to lawyers. However, in light of the unprecedented gag order effecting 3,000 "witnesses" a Clarification Ruling was needed. In this Clarification Ruling, Judge Graf granted the state's motion and offered the following clarification: "The word "witness" as used in the order applies to all witnesses who are part of the prosecution and defense teams. This includes any witness, including lay witnesses, whom the prosecution or defense has a good faith belief will be called to testify at a hearing or trial." The ruling also "requires the attorneys to inform witnesses about the prohibitions". So, what is Utah SCRP Rule 3-3.6 and how does it apply to Blake & Erika? "[5] There are, on the other hand, certain subjects that are more likely than not to have a material prejudicial effect on a proceeding, particularly when they refer to a civil matter triable to a jury, a criminal matter or any other proceeding that could result in incarceration. These subjects relate to: (i) the character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of a party, suspect in a criminal investigation or witness, or the identity of a witness, or the expected testimony of a party or witness;" (ii) in a criminal case or proceeding that could result in incarceration, the possibility of a plea of guilty to the offense or the existence or contents of any confession, admission or statement given by a defendant or suspect or that person's refusal or failure to make a statement; (iii) the performance or results of any examination or test or the refusal or failure of a person to submit to an examination or test, or the identity or nature of physical evidence expected to be presented; (iv) any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of a defendant or suspect in a criminal case or proceeding that could result in incarceration; (v) information that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is likely to be inadmissible as evidence in a trial and that would, if disclosed, create a substantial risk of prejudicing an impartial trial; or (vi) the fact that a defendant has been charged with a crime, unless there is included therein a statement explaining that the charge is merely an accusation and that the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty." Blake?! Erika?! "I FORGIVE HIM"?! How many other times did Blake and Erika both violate Judge Tony Graf's lawful, ENFORCEABLE court order? The clip cuts off the best part: Baron’s forward-looking take at the end. A rare look inside the mindset potentially shaping TPUSA’s moves right now! In my humble opinion, Baron’s analysis is more FACT than opinion. The full show is non-stop destruction, packed wall-to-wall with receipts. DO NOT MISS IT. Baron Coleman's full episode linked in the comments.👇 What’s your take — Did Blake & Erika violate the order?](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2039796547605459447/amplify_video_thumb/2039795205520711680/img/GA9JjaelP_MyVKPW.jpg)
