Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

LeBron James says he turned down a $10,000,000 check from Reebok while still in high school because he thought Nike or Adidas might offer him $30,000,000 “When he slid it down there and he said, ‘If you take this right now, just promise me you won’t go talk to...

711,757 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Reebok CEO Todd Krinsky says they offered LeBron James a $90,000,000 deal plus a $10 million check before he signed with Nike “He came to Boston. We had an amazing presentation. I think he had already visited Nike, and we went into the boardroom. We go in there and Paul was one for the theatrics. He was the best salesman in the world. We made an offer to LeBron right there” “We're sitting around this table and Paul offers them, I believe it was $90 million. Paul stands up. He walks around the table behind LeBron. I think he said to Gloria, LeBron's mom, ‘What's the name of your bank?’ She says, ‘Akron Trust,’ or whatever” “He pulls out a check and goes, ‘This is a live check. Not part of the contract. This is a live check for $10 million. If you sign with us tonight, you can take this check back to Akron Trust and deposit it’” “We're all like, ‘Oh shit.’ That was a move. Also not telling his staff because he wanted the moment. I'm across from these guys and I see his mom trying to figure this out. I see Maverick unbuttoning his shirt, getting some air. And I see LeBron stoic” “He didn't accept the check. He asked if we would leave the room. It felt like a lifetime, but it was 45 minutes. We go back in and they basically said they had to honor a meeting with Adidas. Then they had a follow up with Nike where the rumor is Nike matched the $100 million” “I think if he had made that statement and come to Reebok, it would have changed our position in basketball forever”

dank

291,282 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Naval Ravikant on Elon Musk: “The great entrepreneurs are always willing to start over” Naval argues that pride is the enemy of learning: “When I look at my friends and colleagues, the ones who are still stuck in the past and have grown the least are the ones who were the proudest because they feel they already had the answers and don’t want to correct themselves publicly… Pride prevents you from saying, ‘I’m wrong.’” The problem with pride, Naval explains, is that it prevents you from saying “I’m wrong.” “When you don’t admit that you were wrong, you get stuck in it and you get trapped in a local maxima, as opposed to going back down and climbing up the mountain again… The great artists always have this ability to start over — whether it’s Paul Simon, Madonna, or U2.” And Naval argues that the best entrepreneurs are always willing to start over too: “I’m always struck by the Elon Musk story where he did PayPal… And he said something along the lines of: ‘I made $200 million from the sale of PayPal. I put $100 million into SpaceX, $80 million into Tesla, $20 million into Solar City, and I had to borrow money for rent.’ This guy is a perennial risk taker. He’s always willing to start over. He doesn’t have any pride about being seen as successful or being seen as a failure. He’s willing to put it all on the line to back himself again. But the key thing is he’s always willing to start over… It’s a willingness to look like a fool and a willingness to start over.” He continues: “A lot of people just don’t have that. They become successful or rich or famous and that’s it. They’re stuck. They don’t want to go back to zero, but creating anything great requires going from zero to one, and that means you go back to zero. And that’s a really painful and hard thing to do.” Video source: Chris Williamson (2025)

Startup Archive

71,385 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“And anyway, I wanted to clarify something that was told to me in a half-assed way by some fanatical people, because I don’t call these people fans, I call them fanatics. And thank God they eventually remove themselves from the community on their own, because fundamentally they were never really part of the community to begin with, given the kinds of actions and thoughts they have. Now, you all know very well that there are people among you who help me, whom I absolutely welcome and appreciate a lot, actually, probably more than what they even give me. And as a result, I do have a human, working relationship that goes beyond just being a fan, right? So of course, in certain circumstances, because of specific skills people have and the kind of help they give, it’s obvious that more conversations start happening and a more developed human relationship begins, beyond a simple… you know. That’s how life works. It’s not like I can live my life and talk to every single one of you in the exact same way. It’s normal,choices are made based on the situations that come up. Anyone who’s mentally healthy understands this and tries to build a human relationship with me in some way. But those who aren’t healthy think, “Well, why does she talk to her and not to me?” But I can’t talk to everyone. Even though I try to do it in my own way, if I started talking to every single one of you, my life would obviously be over. And I think that applies to anyone who has a community or a group of people who follow them. So then this thing came out about me going to Disneyland. But, holy crap, as they say, maybe! Maybe I would go to Disneyland! And even if I did go to Disneyland, it’s none of your fucking business if I want to go to Disneyland. What the fuck do you care if I want to go to Disneyland? It’s my business. Also, I haven’t been to Disneyland in 18 years, last time was with a friend from high school. But even then, it’s still my business if I want to go with whomever I want: if I’m dating someone or not, if I want to go with a friend, if I want to go with a fan I choose from among you. Is it my business or not? I mean, is everything okay with you people? And then, what the fuck does it change for you? Do you appreciate me for who I am? Good. Appreciate me for who I am and for what I do, not for who I’m with or where I go. Sometimes it feels like I’m talking to a jealous girlfriend. But I already, normally, believe me, don’t get involved with certain people, or a certain type of person, because jealousy and unresolved issues really bother me. Let me explain better. Let’s say I get into a relationship. My partner should never make jealousy scenes. You want to go to Disneyland with your friends? Go. Don’t go. What do I care? That’s your business. It’s great that our paths cross and we have a beautiful, loving life together, but that doesn’t erase my other relationships or my other bonds. Sometimes, with some people in this community, it feels like I’m dating them, like they think I’m their girlfriend. That’s not normal. You’re fanatics, you’re not well. So it’s actually a good thing if you don’t come to the meetups I organize. I even send you a kiss and bye-bye, good riddance, because you’re not right in the head. Anyway, what was I saying… maybe I’d really like to go to Disneyland, but honestly I don’t even have the head for Disneyland anymore. I’ve got other stuff going on in my brain, as they say, and for now I prefer working over going to Disneyland. Also, instead of Disneyland, I would’ve preferred the Maldives, if we really want to say it. Or at least the sea, one way or another. But if I go to London, if I go to Paris, it’s for one reason: to have the chance to work and create content. And on the other hand, to meet you. So if I go to Paris that day, it’s because I’m trying to organize a day where I can go and meet you for an hour or so, because I’m only there for a day. And I hope you can understand that.”

Korslayage

69,047 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

ZELENSKYY ON HIS CONVERSATION WITH ABRAMOVICH: Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. ZELENSKYY: Abramovich, so he came to Kyiv,bI think that he said: "I have message direct to you, and I want to get message, and take message from you, and to give it to Putin." But he said that it has to be silently, without any kind of, public messages. I said, "Look, it's your choice. Okay, for us it doesn't matter, public or un-public." But it's always with Russians such way. If they say something has to be between us, it's mean that tomorrow not only we will know about it. But it's not a secret. He came, and he wanted to give me the message that they want to to understand what we are ready to do. I said: "The question is not about us. You are fighting against us on our territory." And I said to him about Donbas, it was the key message. And I said: "No, we will not leave, and we will not go out from our territory. No, we will not give you a victory such way. And you will not get it." And we spoke about any kind of compromises. I said that all the compromises after ceasefire. Ceasefire is the biggest compromise from our side to your side. JOURNALIST: So is he a go-between now? Between you and Vladimir Putin, he's going back and forth? ZELENSKYY: I don't know. When he got message from me, he said he will go directly to Putin. I said: "Okay, I'm ready to meet, not in Moscow, not in Belarus, and not in Minsk," and it's understandable why. I said, "You can choose any time from tomorrow. You can choose any day, any format. We can choose with President Trump. I'm sure that he will be ready to come, and we can do it with Europeans. I'm sure that everybody want to help, or we can choose the way bilateral, just bilateral meeting."

Kateryna Lisunova

25,494 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten