正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

LeBron James says he turned down a $15,000,000 endorsement contract renewal from McDonald’s to pursue equity and franchise ownership in Blaze Pizza “It was a great partnership with McDonald’s. We did some great things on television. We did some great things over the years. But I remember we went...

cptdankkk's profile picture

dank

26,334 subscribers

79,111 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治体育财经
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

PRX alecks reflects on the team's playstyle and how it has evolved over the years: "I think we've just got a lot more careful. I think that was a bit disappointing on our side because I think we know how to shut this down because we used to do these kinds of things and we couldn't do it today because, again, like I said, we forgot. I can go through the years, but between 2022 to 2024, we pretty much just made sure that everything was strat-based and we just charged people and hoped that we had better mechanics. Then around 2025, I think we took a look at the year and with how good Yoru was, we just tried to leverage the fact that Yoru could be everywhere on the map and we tried to make sure that we understood the game on a micro level a lot better. Maybe for all you know, it came back to bite us in the ass today. What we needed to do was win the fight and then [inaudible], and we used to be very good at that. So if the meta stays the same, I can promise you that we will be back to our best charging people." (via Manguitouu Sons of KS)
2:23

PRX alecks reflects on the team's playstyle and how it has evolved over the years: "I think we've just got a lot more careful. I think that was a bit disappointing on our side because I think we know how to shut this down because we used to do these kinds of things and we couldn't do it today because, again, like I said, we forgot. I can go through the years, but between 2022 to 2024, we pretty much just made sure that everything was strat-based and we just charged people and hoped that we had better mechanics. Then around 2025, I think we took a look at the year and with how good Yoru was, we just tried to leverage the fact that Yoru could be everywhere on the map and we tried to make sure that we understood the game on a micro level a lot better. Maybe for all you know, it came back to bite us in the ass today. What we needed to do was win the fight and then [inaudible], and we used to be very good at that. So if the meta stays the same, I can promise you that we will be back to our best charging people." (via Manguitouu Sons of KS)

VALO2ASIA

71,155 次观看 • 5 个月前

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.
1:27

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

David Senra

27,043 次观看 • 4 个月前

"When social media first started rising, we didn't necessarily realize how much of that was actually just foundational infrastructure for the future of humanity.” Ben Fielding of gensyn on why AI is about to repeat the mistake social media made, and how we can still fix it: "This isn't just a product that you chat with. It's actually new fundamental infrastructure for humanity, and we should build that learning from the lessons from before. If we let a single company build AI, they hold an enormous amount of power in the world." "If you actually distribute that out and provide it in a kind of sovereign way — it's on all of our own devices and we own it — then actually you steer the world in a very different social direction."
0:45

"When social media first started rising, we didn't necessarily realize how much of that was actually just foundational infrastructure for the future of humanity.” Ben Fielding of gensyn on why AI is about to repeat the mistake social media made, and how we can still fix it: "This isn't just a product that you chat with. It's actually new fundamental infrastructure for humanity, and we should build that learning from the lessons from before. If we let a single company build AI, they hold an enormous amount of power in the world." "If you actually distribute that out and provide it in a kind of sovereign way — it's on all of our own devices and we own it — then actually you steer the world in a very different social direction."

a16z crypto

78,712 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 WOW! HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. DROPS this line on an insufferable Democrat representative "If you want just a SOUNDBYTE that you can come in here, you can get that and you did it!" "But if you actually want to SOLVE the problem, call me — because we're aligned on the issue of getting good food to children and we think that we're doing a good job of it." "We could do a better job, but come and tell us how we can do a better job and that would be something we could all profit from."
0:51

🚨 WOW! HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. DROPS this line on an insufferable Democrat representative "If you want just a SOUNDBYTE that you can come in here, you can get that and you did it!" "But if you actually want to SOLVE the problem, call me — because we're aligned on the issue of getting good food to children and we think that we're doing a good job of it." "We could do a better job, but come and tell us how we can do a better job and that would be something we could all profit from."

Eric Daugherty

119,073 次观看 • 3 个月前

James Currier on how he grew a photo sharing site to 47 million users in 6 months “Most product people start by saying, ‘There’s a problem and we’re going to build a product that’s going to solve that problem. Then we’re going to market it,” NFX founder James Currier observes. Of the 45 companies James has spoken to in the last 18 months, at least 40 of them have said some version of this. “I was also taught this back in the 1990s,” James says. “But through experimentation, I’ve realized that this is actually the wrong way to look at it. The right way to look at it — if you want to grow your business — is to ask, ‘What is the language? How am I going to market this?’ . . . Figure out what the language is and then build the product to fit what the language is.” James gives the example of a photo sharing site he launched years ago: “It said ‘Store your Photos’ on the homepage, and we were not growing. So one day, we literally just changed the homepage to say ‘Share your Photos.’ The team that was working on it said, ‘Our site doesn’t actually share photos. It just stores the photos.’ I said, ‘Well, fix that.’ What ended up happening was they started building features that allowed people to share their photos, and we registered 47 million people in 6 months. And that was back when the Internet was 250 million people.” He continues: “What we realized was that by changing the language, you change how the users are interacting with your site. And you also change your thinking about the product so that the features and subsequent language in the product actually fits with the main value proposition.” James gives another example: “We had a matchmaking site, and the promise there was ‘Find a date.’ It wasn’t growing and we had to buy all this traffic from Google and elsewhere to keep the whole thing going. So what we did was we changed the language and the value proposition to say, ‘Help people find a date.’ When we did that, we registered 28 million people in about 9 months, virally with no cost to us. We changed the language, and then we changed the product subsequently.” Video source: Greylock Partners (2016)
2:32

James Currier on how he grew a photo sharing site to 47 million users in 6 months “Most product people start by saying, ‘There’s a problem and we’re going to build a product that’s going to solve that problem. Then we’re going to market it,” NFX founder James Currier observes. Of the 45 companies James has spoken to in the last 18 months, at least 40 of them have said some version of this. “I was also taught this back in the 1990s,” James says. “But through experimentation, I’ve realized that this is actually the wrong way to look at it. The right way to look at it — if you want to grow your business — is to ask, ‘What is the language? How am I going to market this?’ . . . Figure out what the language is and then build the product to fit what the language is.” James gives the example of a photo sharing site he launched years ago: “It said ‘Store your Photos’ on the homepage, and we were not growing. So one day, we literally just changed the homepage to say ‘Share your Photos.’ The team that was working on it said, ‘Our site doesn’t actually share photos. It just stores the photos.’ I said, ‘Well, fix that.’ What ended up happening was they started building features that allowed people to share their photos, and we registered 47 million people in 6 months. And that was back when the Internet was 250 million people.” He continues: “What we realized was that by changing the language, you change how the users are interacting with your site. And you also change your thinking about the product so that the features and subsequent language in the product actually fits with the main value proposition.” James gives another example: “We had a matchmaking site, and the promise there was ‘Find a date.’ It wasn’t growing and we had to buy all this traffic from Google and elsewhere to keep the whole thing going. So what we did was we changed the language and the value proposition to say, ‘Help people find a date.’ When we did that, we registered 28 million people in about 9 months, virally with no cost to us. We changed the language, and then we changed the product subsequently.” Video source: Greylock Partners (2016)

Startup Archive

18,388 次观看 • 8 个月前

Magic Johnson says he built 125 Starbucks, sold them back to the company and used the money to help buy the Dodgers for $2.2 billion “What I did with Starbucks, I let the first one build the second one. I didn’t take any money from the profits we made. Then I let the second one build the third one and fourth one, and on and on and on. I didn’t take no money out until we built 50 stores” “Because it was important to scale the business, but also put myself in a position where I could sell those stores back to Starbucks and Howard Schultz. We built 125 Starbucks, and then I was able to sell all of them back. That was my exit strategy” “We did that in five or six years. I sold Starbucks, and who would have ever thught that the Dodgers would be for sale. I used the money that came back to me from the Starbucks sale and put it into the Dodger deal. Them and the Yankees, those are the two biggest brands. I knew it we would hit a homerun”
1:16

Magic Johnson says he built 125 Starbucks, sold them back to the company and used the money to help buy the Dodgers for $2.2 billion “What I did with Starbucks, I let the first one build the second one. I didn’t take any money from the profits we made. Then I let the second one build the third one and fourth one, and on and on and on. I didn’t take no money out until we built 50 stores” “Because it was important to scale the business, but also put myself in a position where I could sell those stores back to Starbucks and Howard Schultz. We built 125 Starbucks, and then I was able to sell all of them back. That was my exit strategy” “We did that in five or six years. I sold Starbucks, and who would have ever thught that the Dodgers would be for sale. I used the money that came back to me from the Starbucks sale and put it into the Dodger deal. Them and the Yankees, those are the two biggest brands. I knew it we would hit a homerun”

dank

1,007,951 次观看 • 4 天前

[ENG] DEW : I'm really happy. Since we're already close, getting to work on the same project gave us time to talk about how we wanted to play our characters and how things should go. And when we went to film the pilot, everything became much clearer—we could really visualize it. DEW : This project actually started when P’Chick talked to me first, like, ‘Hey, what would it be like if the plot was something like this?’ And when it came to the part involving drawing comics or manga, I felt like, "okay, this is something I can do". So the idea was that in the pilot, they would think about how each victim was murdered, and then I’d draw the manga version of it so it could be used in the story. And in the pilot, some of the drawings were done by me as well. Like the part you saw where there was blood coming out —the scene with Tee bleeding. I drew it myself, just like you see it #dewtee #ดิวธี #dew_jsu #tee_vtp #GMMTV2026 #MrKillSeries
1:22

[ENG] DEW : I'm really happy. Since we're already close, getting to work on the same project gave us time to talk about how we wanted to play our characters and how things should go. And when we went to film the pilot, everything became much clearer—we could really visualize it. DEW : This project actually started when P’Chick talked to me first, like, ‘Hey, what would it be like if the plot was something like this?’ And when it came to the part involving drawing comics or manga, I felt like, "okay, this is something I can do". So the idea was that in the pilot, they would think about how each victim was murdered, and then I’d draw the manga version of it so it could be used in the story. And in the pilot, some of the drawings were done by me as well. Like the part you saw where there was blood coming out —the scene with Tee bleeding. I drew it myself, just like you see it #dewtee #ดิวธี #dew_jsu #tee_vtp #GMMTV2026 #MrKillSeries

imoyy✨️

63,546 次观看 • 8 个月前

Sergey Brin on AI and Jeff Dean back in December when Gemini peaked: “I would say in some ways we for sure messed up in that we underinvested and sort of didn't take it as seriously as we should have, say, eight years ago when we published the Transformer paper. We actually didn't take it all that seriously and didn't necessarily invest in scaling the compute. And also we were too scared to bring it to people because chatbots say dumb things. And, you know, OpenAI ran with it, which is good for them. It was a super smart insight, and it was also our people like Ilya who went there to do that. But I do think we still have benefited from that long history. So we had a lot of the research and development of neural networks kind of going back to Google Brain. That was also kind of lucky. It wasn't luck that we hired Jeff Dean. I mean, we were lucky to get him. But we were in this sort of mindset that deep technical things matter. And so we hired him. We hired a lot of people from DEC, honestly, because they had the top research labs at the time. But he [Jeff Dean] was passionate about neural networks. And it stemmed, I think, from actually his college experiment. I don't know. He was like, whatever, curing third world disease and figuring out neural networks when he was like 16. He's done crazy things. But he was passionate about it. He built up a whole effort. And actually in my division at the time in Google X. We had him but I didn't I was like okay Jeff you do whatever you want. He's like oh we can tell cats from dogs. I'm like oh okay cool. But you know, you also trust your technical people and soon enough they were developing all these algorithms these neural nets that were doing some of our search. And then, you know, Noam came up with a transformer and we were able to do more and more. But yeah, I mean, so we had the underpinnings, we had the R&D. We did underinvest for a number of years and didn't take it as seriously as we should have.” Both Jeff Dean and Noam Shazeer left Google in the past two months.
2:26

Sergey Brin on AI and Jeff Dean back in December when Gemini peaked: “I would say in some ways we for sure messed up in that we underinvested and sort of didn't take it as seriously as we should have, say, eight years ago when we published the Transformer paper. We actually didn't take it all that seriously and didn't necessarily invest in scaling the compute. And also we were too scared to bring it to people because chatbots say dumb things. And, you know, OpenAI ran with it, which is good for them. It was a super smart insight, and it was also our people like Ilya who went there to do that. But I do think we still have benefited from that long history. So we had a lot of the research and development of neural networks kind of going back to Google Brain. That was also kind of lucky. It wasn't luck that we hired Jeff Dean. I mean, we were lucky to get him. But we were in this sort of mindset that deep technical things matter. And so we hired him. We hired a lot of people from DEC, honestly, because they had the top research labs at the time. But he [Jeff Dean] was passionate about neural networks. And it stemmed, I think, from actually his college experiment. I don't know. He was like, whatever, curing third world disease and figuring out neural networks when he was like 16. He's done crazy things. But he was passionate about it. He built up a whole effort. And actually in my division at the time in Google X. We had him but I didn't I was like okay Jeff you do whatever you want. He's like oh we can tell cats from dogs. I'm like oh okay cool. But you know, you also trust your technical people and soon enough they were developing all these algorithms these neural nets that were doing some of our search. And then, you know, Noam came up with a transformer and we were able to do more and more. But yeah, I mean, so we had the underpinnings, we had the R&D. We did underinvest for a number of years and didn't take it as seriously as we should have.” Both Jeff Dean and Noam Shazeer left Google in the past two months.

tae kim

247,281 次观看 • 5 天前

Trump on eliminating the Filibuster… He might just be giving you the playbook on how the rest of this plan gets rolled out… “I am totally in favor of terminating the filibuster, and we would be back to work within 10 minutes after that vote took place, and lots of other good things would happen. Here's some of the things that we'd pass if we terminated the filibuster, voter ID, no mail in, voting, no cash bail, no men and women's sports, no welfare for illegals. You could go on and on. This is two pages of things would do if you did that without it. I don't know that you passed anything, because you can't deal with them. But if we do it. We will never lose the midterms, and we will never lose the general election, because we will have produced so many different things for our people, for the people, for the country, that it would be impossible to lose an election. ….. if the filibuster is terminated, we will have the most productive three years in the history of our country. If the filibuster is not terminated, then we will be in a slog with the Democrats, and very little for either party will be done. So it's a good thing.”
1:39

Trump on eliminating the Filibuster… He might just be giving you the playbook on how the rest of this plan gets rolled out… “I am totally in favor of terminating the filibuster, and we would be back to work within 10 minutes after that vote took place, and lots of other good things would happen. Here's some of the things that we'd pass if we terminated the filibuster, voter ID, no mail in, voting, no cash bail, no men and women's sports, no welfare for illegals. You could go on and on. This is two pages of things would do if you did that without it. I don't know that you passed anything, because you can't deal with them. But if we do it. We will never lose the midterms, and we will never lose the general election, because we will have produced so many different things for our people, for the people, for the country, that it would be impossible to lose an election. ….. if the filibuster is terminated, we will have the most productive three years in the history of our country. If the filibuster is not terminated, then we will be in a slog with the Democrats, and very little for either party will be done. So it's a good thing.”

NewsTreason Channel 17

59,548 次观看 • 9 个月前

Michael Beasley says LeBron told him he was playing so good it was costing the starters their stats, then out of nowhere, he never got off the bench again UD: “Me and D-Wade were the ones that went to Spo. We was a little light on the depth, and we was like, we need Beas. We need a guy that could come off the bench, get buckets on the nights where Bron and D-Wade might be out or we just need somebody to take some of the load off them.” Beas: “One thing that made me feel good, it was like two, three games in a row. One I remember ‘cause I crossed somebody up and Bron asked me how I did it, we was in Charlotte.” “They put the second unit in, I get to barbecuing so good that they don’t even got to come back in the game. Bron made a comment on the plane like, ‘Beas, you keep playing like this, we ain’t even gonna get our stats for the season.’ I was young, I was just ready. Then just out of nowhere, I just stopped playing.” “And I was optimistic every day, and that whooped my ass because every night I didn’t play. At the same time, I was around my favorite players, my favorite people. So I couldn’t be upset about that. But then the dog in me just made me hate Spo.”
1:03

Michael Beasley says LeBron told him he was playing so good it was costing the starters their stats, then out of nowhere, he never got off the bench again UD: “Me and D-Wade were the ones that went to Spo. We was a little light on the depth, and we was like, we need Beas. We need a guy that could come off the bench, get buckets on the nights where Bron and D-Wade might be out or we just need somebody to take some of the load off them.” Beas: “One thing that made me feel good, it was like two, three games in a row. One I remember ‘cause I crossed somebody up and Bron asked me how I did it, we was in Charlotte.” “They put the second unit in, I get to barbecuing so good that they don’t even got to come back in the game. Bron made a comment on the plane like, ‘Beas, you keep playing like this, we ain’t even gonna get our stats for the season.’ I was young, I was just ready. Then just out of nowhere, I just stopped playing.” “And I was optimistic every day, and that whooped my ass because every night I didn’t play. At the same time, I was around my favorite players, my favorite people. So I couldn’t be upset about that. But then the dog in me just made me hate Spo.”

katsu

217,145 次观看 • 5 天前

Charlie Evans revealed in a recent interview with MarieClaire that the chair pull was improvised “We needed to be closer for that and I didn’t really feel like leaning that far, so we just kind of did it in the moment,” Evans tells marie claire Australia exclusively. “It looked right and it felt great and it didn’t interfere with the shot, so we just kept it in.” “Mika is so funny and so open and willing to try things out and play a scene a million different ways. She’s so good at saying yes and exploring things, which we did,” he recalls. “We kind of just went through that scene instinctually and that was sort of the final product, was whatever we felt in the moment. It didn’t really need much adjusting, which was nice.”
0:39

Charlie Evans revealed in a recent interview with MarieClaire that the chair pull was improvised “We needed to be closer for that and I didn’t really feel like leaning that far, so we just kind of did it in the moment,” Evans tells marie claire Australia exclusively. “It looked right and it felt great and it didn’t interfere with the shot, so we just kept it in.” “Mika is so funny and so open and willing to try things out and play a scene a million different ways. She’s so good at saying yes and exploring things, which we did,” he recalls. “We kind of just went through that scene instinctually and that was sort of the final product, was whatever we felt in the moment. It didn’t really need much adjusting, which was nice.”

Off Campus Updates

432,801 次观看 • 2 个月前

Saliba on the moment he new Arsenal would be Champions: “The first part of the season, even when you start, you know that the Premier League is long. But I think I started to feel that we can do it in March after the game against Everton. For me, it was clear that we were going to win that league. “But after when we came back from national team, I think it was a bit hard. But we kept going and believe in ourselves. Even after the loss against City, we are the champions.”
0:38

Saliba on the moment he new Arsenal would be Champions: “The first part of the season, even when you start, you know that the Premier League is long. But I think I started to feel that we can do it in March after the game against Everton. For me, it was clear that we were going to win that league. “But after when we came back from national team, I think it was a bit hard. But we kept going and believe in ourselves. Even after the loss against City, we are the champions.”

Connor Humm

45,149 次观看 • 2 个月前

When I was coaching at Cornell, I worked mainly with the forwards and one of the things I loved to show on video was “Effort Before Offense” plays. A great effort to force a turnover where we could then go in transition. A won battle or race for possession of the puck. Taking a hit to make a play so teammates could get a scoring opportunity. The players loved it and it helped us buy into a relentless identity we wanted to have to pursue pucks…so we could have it more…so we could play more on offense. This would be one of those clips. It’s a great effort from the Caps’ Raddysh to win the shot retrieval battle. He then gets it up to the point, goes to the dirty area of the ice, and gets rewarded with the goal. Winning the shot retrieval battle. Getting to the dirty area. Effort/desire decisions that led to the goal. Great job!!
0:36

When I was coaching at Cornell, I worked mainly with the forwards and one of the things I loved to show on video was “Effort Before Offense” plays. A great effort to force a turnover where we could then go in transition. A won battle or race for possession of the puck. Taking a hit to make a play so teammates could get a scoring opportunity. The players loved it and it helped us buy into a relentless identity we wanted to have to pursue pucks…so we could have it more…so we could play more on offense. This would be one of those clips. It’s a great effort from the Caps’ Raddysh to win the shot retrieval battle. He then gets it up to the point, goes to the dirty area of the ice, and gets rewarded with the goal. Winning the shot retrieval battle. Getting to the dirty area. Effort/desire decisions that led to the goal. Great job!!

Topher Scott

16,328 次观看 • 1 年前

We are the leader of the free world and we’ve spent nearly 80 years in that role. I think it would be a grave error to walk away from this leadership role. As it is often said, America is great because we are good. If we ever cease to be good, we’ll also cease to be great.
7:58

We are the leader of the free world and we’ve spent nearly 80 years in that role. I think it would be a grave error to walk away from this leadership role. As it is often said, America is great because we are good. If we ever cease to be good, we’ll also cease to be great.

Rep. Don Bacon 🇺🇸✈️🏍️⭐️🎖️

336,898 次观看 • 1 年前

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"
1:44

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

Brian Kight

125,742 次观看 • 2 年前

I remember I had asked Brandon Aiyuk in the offseason if he would be down to do a YouTube live interview and he said that it wasn’t a good time and he’d let me know if something worked out. Naturally I just thought he was good off doing the interview which is perfectly fine but right after the 49ers lost to Philly in the NFCCG, he reached out and dm’d me if I wanted to setup an interview. I thought that was so cool that he really reached back out to set up the interview with me like he said he would. We did the interview, he was great, laid back, we talked ball, the chat was absolutely electric. My favorite interview I’ve ever done. I know BA has done a lot of extremely questionable things as of late but I genuinely miss this dude who just chopped it up with me on stream for over an hour and was super generous with his time.
0:53

Sensitive content

I remember I had asked Brandon Aiyuk in the offseason if he would be down to do a YouTube live interview and he said that it wasn’t a good time and he’d let me know if something worked out. Naturally I just thought he was good off doing the interview which is perfectly fine but right after the 49ers lost to Philly in the NFCCG, he reached out and dm’d me if I wanted to setup an interview. I thought that was so cool that he really reached back out to set up the interview with me like he said he would. We did the interview, he was great, laid back, we talked ball, the chat was absolutely electric. My favorite interview I’ve ever done. I know BA has done a lot of extremely questionable things as of late but I genuinely miss this dude who just chopped it up with me on stream for over an hour and was super generous with his time.

Brad

661,217 次观看 • 5 个月前

In Wolf of Wall Street, Jon Bernthal says he improvised “Ma, we got chicken or what?” “It was never even supposed to be my mother’s house. They just wired us for sound just in case.” “Again, even though there was no lines written in the scene, it was supposed to be something we were gonna shoot in five minutes. “It was just supposed to be a shot of me working out.” “We worked out this whole relationship and, you know, yelling to the mother in the house.” “And I remember the next day… Marty walked in… and he said to me, ‘Man, I saw what you did yesterday. It was great, it was great.’
0:34

In Wolf of Wall Street, Jon Bernthal says he improvised “Ma, we got chicken or what?” “It was never even supposed to be my mother’s house. They just wired us for sound just in case.” “Again, even though there was no lines written in the scene, it was supposed to be something we were gonna shoot in five minutes. “It was just supposed to be a shot of me working out.” “We worked out this whole relationship and, you know, yelling to the mother in the house.” “And I remember the next day… Marty walked in… and he said to me, ‘Man, I saw what you did yesterday. It was great, it was great.’

Emir Han

6,407,339 次观看 • 6 天前

Kevin Durant says the Warriors never addressed the Draymond Green incident, ultimately leading to him leaving the team “It wasn't the argument. It was the way that everybody, Steve Kerr, acted like it didn't happen. Bob Myers then tried to just discipline you and think that that would put the mask over everything” “I really felt like that was such a big situation for us as a group, the first time we went through something like that. We had to get that shit all out” “I remember watching The Last Dance. And when Scottie didn't go into the game, the whole team in the locker room said, ‘Scottie, that was fucked up that you did that’” “We needed that. We just needed to throw all of that shit out on the table and say, ‘Yo, Dray, K, that was fucked up that we even had to go through that. Let's just wipe our hands of that and go finish the task.’ I don't think we did that. We tried to dance around it” “I just didn't like how all of that, just the vibe between all of that, it just made shit weird to me. And I'd rather us be who we say we are. Family first. Communication is key. We didn't show that. That's what rubbed me the wrong way more than anything”
0:57

Kevin Durant says the Warriors never addressed the Draymond Green incident, ultimately leading to him leaving the team “It wasn't the argument. It was the way that everybody, Steve Kerr, acted like it didn't happen. Bob Myers then tried to just discipline you and think that that would put the mask over everything” “I really felt like that was such a big situation for us as a group, the first time we went through something like that. We had to get that shit all out” “I remember watching The Last Dance. And when Scottie didn't go into the game, the whole team in the locker room said, ‘Scottie, that was fucked up that you did that’” “We needed that. We just needed to throw all of that shit out on the table and say, ‘Yo, Dray, K, that was fucked up that we even had to go through that. Let's just wipe our hands of that and go finish the task.’ I don't think we did that. We tried to dance around it” “I just didn't like how all of that, just the vibe between all of that, it just made shit weird to me. And I'd rather us be who we say we are. Family first. Communication is key. We didn't show that. That's what rubbed me the wrong way more than anything”

dank

431,844 次观看 • 24 天前

Greg Brockman talks about when OpenAI first realized that AGI can't be achieved with "Non-Profit" status and the decided to abandon its Non-Profit roots. "In 2017, we started to think very hard about, first of all, how do we really achieve the mission? How do we actually build an AGI? What will that look like? And we started to do the math on compute. You start to realize that it is going to take a big computer. We came across a company called Cerebras, which was building a unique piece of computing hardware. The kind of computer that they were promising, we realized, was going to be far advanced from where our compute calculations looked. As you start to realize, if we could buy a lot of those computers, we could actually probably succeed at building an AGI. If we could get exclusive access to Cerebras, that could give us an overwhelming advantage. If we could buy very large data centers, that could be something unique as well. The thing about nonprofit fundraising is that I think there is essentially a cap to what is possible there. And so Elon, Sam, Ilya, and I all agreed that the only path forward for OpenAI, and the only path to achieve the mission, was to create a for-profit entity associated with OpenAI in some form. And so, we were committed to that direction. That is something that we knew was the only way to achieve the mission." --- From "The Knowledge Project Podcast" YT Channel (link in comment)
0:55

Greg Brockman talks about when OpenAI first realized that AGI can't be achieved with "Non-Profit" status and the decided to abandon its Non-Profit roots. "In 2017, we started to think very hard about, first of all, how do we really achieve the mission? How do we actually build an AGI? What will that look like? And we started to do the math on compute. You start to realize that it is going to take a big computer. We came across a company called Cerebras, which was building a unique piece of computing hardware. The kind of computer that they were promising, we realized, was going to be far advanced from where our compute calculations looked. As you start to realize, if we could buy a lot of those computers, we could actually probably succeed at building an AGI. If we could get exclusive access to Cerebras, that could give us an overwhelming advantage. If we could buy very large data centers, that could be something unique as well. The thing about nonprofit fundraising is that I think there is essentially a cap to what is possible there. And so Elon, Sam, Ilya, and I all agreed that the only path forward for OpenAI, and the only path to achieve the mission, was to create a for-profit entity associated with OpenAI in some form. And so, we were committed to that direction. That is something that we knew was the only way to achieve the mission." --- From "The Knowledge Project Podcast" YT Channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

10,311 次观看 • 2 个月前