Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Let's ask the uncomfortable question Bill Gates casually glossed over. He says predicting a deadly pandemic was "commonplace knowledge" in the small, elite global health community. Okay. But how did they know it would be so bad? What specific models, intelligence, or research led to such a universally held,...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

348,779 subscribers

38,038 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessScience & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?
7:39

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 views • 7 months ago

We do not know who the target of this was or why the shooter did what they did. Don’t jump to a conclusion that you don’t know answers to. Violence is never the answer.
0:24

We do not know who the target of this was or why the shooter did what they did. Don’t jump to a conclusion that you don’t know answers to. Violence is never the answer.

Brian Krassenstein

86,141 views • 2 months ago

“We know how they did it…” -HHS RFK Jr. The CDC knew there was a link between Autism and ‘Vaccines’ but chose to hide the evidence of their own Study from 1999. They knew that they were causing catastrophic harm.
1:32

“We know how they did it…” -HHS RFK Jr. The CDC knew there was a link between Autism and ‘Vaccines’ but chose to hide the evidence of their own Study from 1999. They knew that they were causing catastrophic harm.

Liz Churchill

19,368 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: What do you make of DOJ monitoring searches on the Epstein files? Jayapal: I found out about it because a reporter called me and wanted to know about the emails I had searched. I was like, how did you know what emails I searched? There’s a separation of powers for a reason. This is spying on members of Congress. We are calling for a full accounting of what they are using it for, and they need to stop that. We need a new process that assures us they are not spying on members of Congress.
0:44

Reporter: What do you make of DOJ monitoring searches on the Epstein files? Jayapal: I found out about it because a reporter called me and wanted to know about the emails I had searched. I was like, how did you know what emails I searched? There’s a separation of powers for a reason. This is spying on members of Congress. We are calling for a full accounting of what they are using it for, and they need to stop that. We need a new process that assures us they are not spying on members of Congress.

Acyn

145,135 views • 5 months ago

Not all of these people represent Christians, or The boby of Christ. True story, when I was a kid, my mother and father worked for the church. We did a lot of outreach in Brooklyn, East New York, to be specific New Lots & and Alabama. I was about 9 or 10 years old. And the church would go there with clothing food, hot dogs, hamburgers. They would cook and grill, and then they would preach. They would sing, and they would pray. They would do a whole bunch of things. And it was not about the money because the church didn't have a lot of money. They just did it because they wanted to help the people, and I was a part of that as a young kid, so I got to see that people like this are judgmental. Snobby fucking christians.
1:47

Not all of these people represent Christians, or The boby of Christ. True story, when I was a kid, my mother and father worked for the church. We did a lot of outreach in Brooklyn, East New York, to be specific New Lots & and Alabama. I was about 9 or 10 years old. And the church would go there with clothing food, hot dogs, hamburgers. They would cook and grill, and then they would preach. They would sing, and they would pray. They would do a whole bunch of things. And it was not about the money because the church didn't have a lot of money. They just did it because they wanted to help the people, and I was a part of that as a young kid, so I got to see that people like this are judgmental. Snobby fucking christians.

SkriptkeeperElect

22,791 views • 7 months ago

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 views • 4 months ago

That's what's got the White House scared to death. The terrorist attack in Moscow was the work of Ukraine and the "terrified" US knew it, a former CIA officer has said. Just a day ago, open source intelligence source OSINTdefender reported that Washington was "increasingly frustrated by Ukraine's unauthorised, blatant actions" against Russia. "This means that the US knew Ukraine was up to something, had an idea of what it was going to do. And there's a good chance that Ukraine not only did it, but did it with weapons and support provided by the United States," former CIA analyst Larry Johnson told Judging Freedom. This version is also supported by the State Department's hasty words that Kiev had nothing to do with the attack, a statement made before Moscow itself had any accurate information about what had happened. "They know Ukraine did it," the former intelligence official said confidently. That's why the US was so quick to declare no involvement in the attack, and why it expressed concern about Ukraine's "egr... 📑Because they know that Ukraine did. And here's how we know. March 7, the United States embassy, Moscow and the UK embassy, Moscow issue a warning to a travel advisor to all Americans and british citizens. Stay away. There's going to be a terrorist attack within 48 hours. Now, that didn't happen, but that was my job. That was part of my job when I was stayed encountered terrorism. Those kinds of warnings are only issued when you have specific, credible information and cannot prevent the attack. Now, usually in those circumstances, if it had enough specificity and was really solid, we would pass it off to, I don't know who that is, we would pass that information off to the other government and let them take action to prevent it. It wouldn't happen. But in this case, what we've had in the last day on open source intelligence, defender, it's one of those Twitter channels very much a part of the propaganda effort out of the CIA. They put out that the US National Security Council and the White House are becoming increasingly frustrated by, quote, unauthorised brazen actions, end quote, taken by Ukraine against Russia. So this means United States knew that Ukraine had something in the pipeline. They knew what they were, they had some idea what they're going to do. And the odds are that not only did Ukraine do it, but they did it with weapons and assistance provided by the United States. That's what's got the White House scared to death.
1:41

That's what's got the White House scared to death. The terrorist attack in Moscow was the work of Ukraine and the "terrified" US knew it, a former CIA officer has said. Just a day ago, open source intelligence source OSINTdefender reported that Washington was "increasingly frustrated by Ukraine's unauthorised, blatant actions" against Russia. "This means that the US knew Ukraine was up to something, had an idea of what it was going to do. And there's a good chance that Ukraine not only did it, but did it with weapons and support provided by the United States," former CIA analyst Larry Johnson told Judging Freedom. This version is also supported by the State Department's hasty words that Kiev had nothing to do with the attack, a statement made before Moscow itself had any accurate information about what had happened. "They know Ukraine did it," the former intelligence official said confidently. That's why the US was so quick to declare no involvement in the attack, and why it expressed concern about Ukraine's "egr... 📑Because they know that Ukraine did. And here's how we know. March 7, the United States embassy, Moscow and the UK embassy, Moscow issue a warning to a travel advisor to all Americans and british citizens. Stay away. There's going to be a terrorist attack within 48 hours. Now, that didn't happen, but that was my job. That was part of my job when I was stayed encountered terrorism. Those kinds of warnings are only issued when you have specific, credible information and cannot prevent the attack. Now, usually in those circumstances, if it had enough specificity and was really solid, we would pass it off to, I don't know who that is, we would pass that information off to the other government and let them take action to prevent it. It wouldn't happen. But in this case, what we've had in the last day on open source intelligence, defender, it's one of those Twitter channels very much a part of the propaganda effort out of the CIA. They put out that the US National Security Council and the White House are becoming increasingly frustrated by, quote, unauthorised brazen actions, end quote, taken by Ukraine against Russia. So this means United States knew that Ukraine had something in the pipeline. They knew what they were, they had some idea what they're going to do. And the odds are that not only did Ukraine do it, but they did it with weapons and assistance provided by the United States. That's what's got the White House scared to death.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

132,088 views • 2 years ago

Mike Grover breaks down how Mossad spies planted bombs in pagers. "So that was thousands of pagers. I think it was a batch of 5000 or 4000 went out. So yeah, a lot of booms. But basically what they did is set up a fake manufacturing company." "They got their Hezbollah client and they made exploding pagers for them. They put high explosives in part of the battery and the detonator in there. And basically, it was configured to explode after a specific message was sent to the pager." MG
8:08

Mike Grover breaks down how Mossad spies planted bombs in pagers. "So that was thousands of pagers. I think it was a batch of 5000 or 4000 went out. So yeah, a lot of booms. But basically what they did is set up a fake manufacturing company." "They got their Hezbollah client and they made exploding pagers for them. They put high explosives in part of the battery and the detonator in there. And basically, it was configured to explode after a specific message was sent to the pager." MG

Shawn Ryan

293,458 views • 1 year ago

Alien Warned Us About AI 50 Years Ago – Were We Too Late to Listen? A shocking revelation suggests that an alien encounter from half a century ago included a warning about the dangers of artificial intelligence. Could this be the ultimate proof that extraterrestrials foresaw the rise of AI and its potential risks? What did they know that we didn’t? Watch this footage and decide for yourself! #FYP #Aliens #UFO #UAP #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Extraterrestrial #Disclosure #Prophecy #Conspiracy
3:46

Alien Warned Us About AI 50 Years Ago – Were We Too Late to Listen? A shocking revelation suggests that an alien encounter from half a century ago included a warning about the dangers of artificial intelligence. Could this be the ultimate proof that extraterrestrials foresaw the rise of AI and its potential risks? What did they know that we didn’t? Watch this footage and decide for yourself! #FYP #Aliens #UFO #UAP #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Extraterrestrial #Disclosure #Prophecy #Conspiracy

OANASA

513,917 views • 1 year ago

.Mark Meckler tells Jeremy Boreing that Candace’s tactics aren’t new. They’re ancient. She simply repackages plain, old gnosticism (secret knowledge). “She has a secret knowledge, and so for her listeners – they want to be in on that secret knowledge…they know something that the rest of us don’t know.” It’s an in-group of people who “don’t ‘know know’ but they know,” & they scorn anyone who questions them as clueless or uninitiated. 🎥:
0:55

.Mark Meckler tells Jeremy Boreing that Candace’s tactics aren’t new. They’re ancient. She simply repackages plain, old gnosticism (secret knowledge). “She has a secret knowledge, and so for her listeners – they want to be in on that secret knowledge…they know something that the rest of us don’t know.” It’s an in-group of people who “don’t ‘know know’ but they know,” & they scorn anyone who questions them as clueless or uninitiated. 🎥:

Jackie Chea ⚖️

17,489 views • 5 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill is launching an investigation into Tim Walz for KNOWING about the Somali fraud for YEARS — in exchange for votes "Walz knew about this fraud in Minnesota since the day he came into office as governor. He's known about this for a decade or so!" "And Democrats had sort of an implicit deal with, with the Somali community there, that they were going to turn their, turn the other way, allow these Somali immigrants to defraud American taxpayers to the tune of billions and billions of dollars." "And in exchange, they expected that Somali community to vote monolithically for Democrats. It was kind of a bargain that Democrats have been doing for a long time and in many other places too." "So what we want to do is bring Tim Walz in and Keith Ellison and ask them, what exactly did you know? And when did you know about this fraud? And how did you know about this fraud? And why didn't you do anything to stop it? And I think that that's something that the American people want to know as well."
0:49

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill is launching an investigation into Tim Walz for KNOWING about the Somali fraud for YEARS — in exchange for votes "Walz knew about this fraud in Minnesota since the day he came into office as governor. He's known about this for a decade or so!" "And Democrats had sort of an implicit deal with, with the Somali community there, that they were going to turn their, turn the other way, allow these Somali immigrants to defraud American taxpayers to the tune of billions and billions of dollars." "And in exchange, they expected that Somali community to vote monolithically for Democrats. It was kind of a bargain that Democrats have been doing for a long time and in many other places too." "So what we want to do is bring Tim Walz in and Keith Ellison and ask them, what exactly did you know? And when did you know about this fraud? And how did you know about this fraud? And why didn't you do anything to stop it? And I think that that's something that the American people want to know as well."

Eric Daugherty

46,330 views • 5 months ago

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”
1:03

🚨David Friedberg: AI is starting to identify and solve problems on its own “I'll give you a science corner example: there's this Evo 2 model that they publish at the Arc Institute, which Patrick Collison, you know, is the main funder and chairman.” “So that Evo 2 model, they just ingested all the DNA data they could find in the world.” “Trillions and trillions of base paired data that they ingested and then they looked at patterns in DNA. And that's it.” “They had no context for what the DNA represented, they had no context for the concept of genes, none of the structured understanding of what that DNA does, what it is, and you know what it did?” “They fed in the BRCA gene variant and the thing output a warning saying, ‘I think that this is a pathogenic variant to DNA,’ without having any context.” “This is the breast cancer allele.” “And it didn't have any knowledge and it wasn't trained on that at all.” “It had no knowledge that there are pathogenic variants for cancer, and it identified that this was a genetic variant that can cause some sort of pathogenic outcome in the organism.” “That's a great example where there's a lack of understanding at the human level on what really drives some of the patterns in nature, the patterns in society, the patterns in behavior that are kind of emergent phenomena perhaps, that these AI models are starting to identify.”

The All-In Podcast

79,718 views • 11 months ago

Ancient historian Josephus recorded a fascinating tradition about the world before the flood. The descendants of Seth believed a great catastrophe was coming, so they inscribed their knowledge onto two massive pillars - one of brick and one of stone - in hopes that their wisdom would survive the destruction of the world. Josephus even claimed the stone pillar still remained in his day. The world before the flood wasn’t a primitive people and they knew that judgment was coming. What knowledge did the descendants of Seth want to pass down to us? What were they trying to warn us about?
1:06

Ancient historian Josephus recorded a fascinating tradition about the world before the flood. The descendants of Seth believed a great catastrophe was coming, so they inscribed their knowledge onto two massive pillars - one of brick and one of stone - in hopes that their wisdom would survive the destruction of the world. Josephus even claimed the stone pillar still remained in his day. The world before the flood wasn’t a primitive people and they knew that judgment was coming. What knowledge did the descendants of Seth want to pass down to us? What were they trying to warn us about?

Noahs Ark Scans

19,652 views • 2 months ago

Rubio on Cuba: The fundamental problem Cuba has is that it has no economy, and the people who are in charge of that country and in control of it don’t know how to improve the everyday lives of their people without giving up power over the sectors they control. They want to control everything. They don’t want the people of Cuba to control anything. So they don’t know how to get themselves out of this. And to the extent that they’ve been offered opportunities to do so, they don’t seem to be able to comprehend or accept them in any way. They would much rather be in charge of a dying country than allow it to prosper.
0:31

Rubio on Cuba: The fundamental problem Cuba has is that it has no economy, and the people who are in charge of that country and in control of it don’t know how to improve the everyday lives of their people without giving up power over the sectors they control. They want to control everything. They don’t want the people of Cuba to control anything. So they don’t know how to get themselves out of this. And to the extent that they’ve been offered opportunities to do so, they don’t seem to be able to comprehend or accept them in any way. They would much rather be in charge of a dying country than allow it to prosper.

Clash Report

139,958 views • 5 months ago

A reminder of what a threat BJ Penn was to the establishment with his run for Governor of Hawaii in 2022!!! We remember telling BJ when we first met him… “Thank you!! You know they will come after you and your family...” We don’t know specifically what has happened since then, but it was clear that the Hawaii political establishment knew they needed to stop BJ Penn and the movement he created. And it appears to us that they found a way. BJ, we will always remember and be grateful for what you did to help wake up and fight for the people in Hawaii. We wish you and your ohana peace and happiness. And we wish we knew how to help. bjpenndotcom Joe Rogan danawhite
1:27

A reminder of what a threat BJ Penn was to the establishment with his run for Governor of Hawaii in 2022!!! We remember telling BJ when we first met him… “Thank you!! You know they will come after you and your family...” We don’t know specifically what has happened since then, but it was clear that the Hawaii political establishment knew they needed to stop BJ Penn and the movement he created. And it appears to us that they found a way. BJ, we will always remember and be grateful for what you did to help wake up and fight for the people in Hawaii. We wish you and your ohana peace and happiness. And we wish we knew how to help. bjpenndotcom Joe Rogan danawhite

surfing4truth

12,109 views • 1 year ago

And listen, they’ve been doing this for years and years, it’s everywhere, I’ve talked about this a lot, you just didn’t know what I was talking about. We go back to this video from Homeland, what’s Homeland doing here? We all know what it’s doing. They assassinated Charlie Kirk, they created hit lists, we were all on the list somewhere, I was targeted for 10 years, so were you guys, some of us were targeted in worse ways than others, and they pumped the hatred through the veins of American society, nonstop, everybody in unison, collective consciousness primed to kill Trump supporters. They did this on purpose. It’s right there in front of your face, it’s been happening, and all it takes is one flip of a switch just like Sen. Elissa Slotkin and her psychopathic friends did in that video, and then it sets off a military coup, revolution, additional assassinations, etc. Trump supporters, we didn’t do any of this, we didn’t spend 10 years massaging the population to kill 50% of Americans. The deep state did, Obama, George Soros, the Democrats, they absolutely did that. And with this video that came out, they must believe that they’ve reached the endgame, they must believe that they’ve primed the population sufficiently, they’ve installed the archetypes sufficiently, that all they have to do is click a switch, and bang, it sets off memetic contagion, and they’ll wipe their hands clean, saying, we don’t know how any of this happened. They absolutely know how this happens. However, they don’t understand this at the level that I understand this, and that’s what we’re gonna talk about.
1:57

And listen, they’ve been doing this for years and years, it’s everywhere, I’ve talked about this a lot, you just didn’t know what I was talking about. We go back to this video from Homeland, what’s Homeland doing here? We all know what it’s doing. They assassinated Charlie Kirk, they created hit lists, we were all on the list somewhere, I was targeted for 10 years, so were you guys, some of us were targeted in worse ways than others, and they pumped the hatred through the veins of American society, nonstop, everybody in unison, collective consciousness primed to kill Trump supporters. They did this on purpose. It’s right there in front of your face, it’s been happening, and all it takes is one flip of a switch just like Sen. Elissa Slotkin and her psychopathic friends did in that video, and then it sets off a military coup, revolution, additional assassinations, etc. Trump supporters, we didn’t do any of this, we didn’t spend 10 years massaging the population to kill 50% of Americans. The deep state did, Obama, George Soros, the Democrats, they absolutely did that. And with this video that came out, they must believe that they’ve reached the endgame, they must believe that they’ve primed the population sufficiently, they’ve installed the archetypes sufficiently, that all they have to do is click a switch, and bang, it sets off memetic contagion, and they’ll wipe their hands clean, saying, we don’t know how any of this happened. They absolutely know how this happens. However, they don’t understand this at the level that I understand this, and that’s what we’re gonna talk about.

Hyperdimensional Hegelian Chaos Giga Wizard™️

259,068 views • 7 months ago

How to reverse the age of your heart by 20 years. Scientists ran a study where they were able to help their subjects reverse the age of their heart by 20 years. They used a specific training protocol to make it happen and I did a video to explain what it is and how to do it. Check it out here:
5:06

How to reverse the age of your heart by 20 years. Scientists ran a study where they were able to help their subjects reverse the age of their heart by 20 years. They used a specific training protocol to make it happen and I did a video to explain what it is and how to do it. Check it out here:

Dan Go

247,542 views • 1 year ago

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is the Bridgewater Thinking Machines paper a blueprint for every enterprise that has ever paid frontier model prices for generic outputs? 47fucb4r8curb4fc8f8r4bfic8r: "What Thinking Machines and Bridgewater did together is a blueprint for how a wide variety of stakeholders within the market can benefit tremendously from using LLMs and integrating them into a larger enterprise system." "They got a pretty old model. A Qwen3 model. Two hundred and thirty-five billion parameters. Not a new model. Not a very sophisticated or impressive state-of-the-art model. And they essentially fine-tuned it on Bridgewater's own proprietary data." "A financial analyst gets a ton of financial documents and has to filter which are worth looking at. Then evaluate which news pieces are relevant. They have a lot of tacit knowledge from doing the job on where to look. What they did was inject a lot of this tacit knowledge into the model through fine-tuning." "Stop obsessing over state-of-the-art models that are the most intelligent possible. Focus on targeting a very specific LLM specifically trained for a specific function to do that function better than the alternatives on the market." "This old non-state-of-the-art model got 84.7% accuracy versus 78% for all the state-of-the-art models. A massive improvement. And the kicker is they got a better performing model that is 14 times cheaper to use."
6:06

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is the Bridgewater Thinking Machines paper a blueprint for every enterprise that has ever paid frontier model prices for generic outputs? 47fucb4r8curb4fc8f8r4bfic8r: "What Thinking Machines and Bridgewater did together is a blueprint for how a wide variety of stakeholders within the market can benefit tremendously from using LLMs and integrating them into a larger enterprise system." "They got a pretty old model. A Qwen3 model. Two hundred and thirty-five billion parameters. Not a new model. Not a very sophisticated or impressive state-of-the-art model. And they essentially fine-tuned it on Bridgewater's own proprietary data." "A financial analyst gets a ton of financial documents and has to filter which are worth looking at. Then evaluate which news pieces are relevant. They have a lot of tacit knowledge from doing the job on where to look. What they did was inject a lot of this tacit knowledge into the model through fine-tuning." "Stop obsessing over state-of-the-art models that are the most intelligent possible. Focus on targeting a very specific LLM specifically trained for a specific function to do that function better than the alternatives on the market." "This old non-state-of-the-art model got 84.7% accuracy versus 78% for all the state-of-the-art models. A massive improvement. And the kicker is they got a better performing model that is 14 times cheaper to use."

MTS

92,876 views • 6 days ago