Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚀 Looking forward to a foundtional humanoid motion tracker? 📢Meet Any2Track — Track Any Motions under Any Disturbances! 💡Any2Track shows SOTA performance on diverse motions under multiple disturbances. Project: Codebase:

44,452 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Multi-Track Timeline Control for Text-Driven 3D Human Motion Generation paper page: Recent advances in generative modeling have led to promising progress on synthesizing 3D human motion from text, with methods that can generate character animations from short prompts and specified durations. However, using a single text prompt as input lacks the fine-grained control needed by animators, such as composing multiple actions and defining precise durations for parts of the motion. To address this, we introduce the new problem of timeline control for text-driven motion synthesis, which provides an intuitive, yet fine-grained, input interface for users. Instead of a single prompt, users can specify a multi-track timeline of multiple prompts organized in temporal intervals that may overlap. This enables specifying the exact timings of each action and composing multiple actions in sequence or at overlapping intervals. To generate composite animations from a multi-track timeline, we propose a new test-time denoising method. This method can be integrated with any pre-trained motion diffusion model to synthesize realistic motions that accurately reflect the timeline. At every step of denoising, our method processes each timeline interval (text prompt) individually, subsequently aggregating the predictions with consideration for the specific body parts engaged in each action. Experimental comparisons and ablations validate that our method produces realistic motions that respect the semantics and timing of given text prompts.

AK

126,595 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I would tell you about the arguments that were made for Karen Read’s parents’ phone records this AM in court, but Attorney Liza Little just mopped the floor with Hank Brennan’s argument like she did a year ago when she called out the fraud perpetrated on the court by ADA Adam Lally about “lab protocols & procedures”. Light work. Isn’t Hank Brennan an Attorney? - At the last motion hearing, Brennan failed to serve all the parties of his Rule 17 Motions seeking William and Janet Read’s Verizon records, thereby requiring another hearing (today) to argue them. - Brennan’s original Rule 17 Motion for Mr. Read’s Verizon records was premised on the fabrication that Karen Read called her father in the middle of the night after dropping John O’Keefe off at Brian and Nicole Albert’s after party. This is a provably false statement as the Verizon records—already in the Commonwealth’s possession—show that the first time Karen Read called her father that morning was at 6:32 AM. Apparently Judge Bev is unbothered when the Commonwealth lies about material facts in court and in court documents. - In addition to being based on a total fabrication, Brennan failed to produce the required accompanying affidavit with factual showing that all four elements of Lampron were met to support his Rule 17 motion. - Notably, Brennan’s Rule 17 Motion for Mr. Read’s records failed to meet its burden, or even a single part of that four prong test. TAKEAWAY? It’s a fishing expedition 🎣. But, Hank Brennan’s a good Attorney I thought? Surely he’s well versed in Rule 17 Motions and their requirements? So the real question is: Why is this seemingly seasoned Attorney filing these obviously erroneous and frivolous motions for duplicative evidence while also failing to properly serve the parties by the intended hearing on it? Given that the defense’s response filings for each of these motions were nearly 30 pages long, and these requests are clearly disingenuous as they’re duplicative and come nowhere close to meeting any burden, one has to wonder if this is a tactic by Brennan and DA Michael Morrissey’s Office to try to bleed Karen Read and her defense team dry of all resources by wasting their time and energy on useless motions? What say you? What’s the game plan here exactly? #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

65,809 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‼️👩🏼‍⚖️NEW MARIE CARVALHO MOTION TO SEAL ‼️⚖️ Today, via certified mail, I received a motion from Marie Carvalho to seal last week’s court hearing. In it, she claims I shared her “medical diagnosis and history” on social media after the hearing. See her motion below. Every single detail she testified to regarding her medical history she had already publicly disclosed herself, multiple times, on her own shows. This is just a sample. She was explicitly told at the start of the hearing that it was being recorded and part of the public record. None of us were “discussing her medical history.” I simply mentioned what she said under oath, including her claim that I made fun of her do-rag. She tried spinning that into mockery of a disability. False. I had zero idea why she was wearing it, and contrary to popular belief, I don’t watch all her shitty shows. This is yet another example of Marie wasting the court’s time. I’ll be filing an opposition next week, loaded with case law. In New Hampshire, there is a strong constitutional presumption that court proceedings and records are public. The burden is on the moving party to prove that a specific and substantial interest in confidentiality outweighs that presumption. That’s a high bar. Motions to seal are for truly sensitive matters, i.e. domestic violence, minors, etc. They are not information you yourself already put out on your shows. There is no irreparable harm when the information was already public by your own hand. The judge is going to love this. Especially after you said “it’s back on” right after your petition was denied.

The old M can’t come to the phone right now

13,906 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat