正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Major Debate On SC/ST Act If there is a problem with the absence of a preliminary inquiry, the law can be reformed. There are several ways to address these concerns without scrapping the entire SC/ST Act: Avishkar Singhvi, SC Advocate tells Pranesh Kumar Roy If there is misuse or... show more

TIMES NOW

9,827,158 subscribers

31,886 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

क्षत्रिय इतिहास RAJPUT HISTORY 的头像

क्षत्रिय इतिहास RAJPUT HISTORY4 天前

@roypranesh This draconian law must be abolished Other wise it will eat whole general category

DarkStar 的头像

DarkStar5 天前

@roypranesh When the case is proved to be false, the complainant should repay the govt the compensation they would havw received by then and also pay the same compensation amount to falsely accused and a jail term of 6 months, it will solve all the fake sc st cases .

Kumar Harendra (🚩 भूमिहार-ब्राह्मण🚩 ) 的头像

Kumar Harendra (🚩 भूमिहार-ब्राह्मण🚩 )5 天前

@roypranesh ScStAct is a terrorist law

INDIA &WORLD (🇮🇳 &🌎) 的头像

INDIA &WORLD (🇮🇳 &🌎)5 天前

@roypranesh The SC/ST Act Nightmare of OBC & GC Remove this illogical act

Om Prakash Singh # आम आदमी 的头像

Om Prakash Singh # आम आदमी4 天前

@SSChauhan_CCE @roypranesh 🙏🤔🙏sir ji! Even an ordinary citizen has now begun to feel afraid of speaking or writing anything on this subject!! When people start fearing even the expression of their thoughts, it certainly raises serious questions. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳🙏 जय हिन्द 🙏

RB_Libertarian 的头像

RB_Libertarian4 天前

@roypranesh Scrap the Act. Insulting brahmins = insulting SCST

Ram 的头像

Ram4 天前

@roypranesh This is the SC/ST case filed against RG but what's the action taken? This means as @ARanganathan72 says, law is used selectively according yo convenience. In other words, its misued!

Vishal kumar 的头像

Vishal kumar5 天前

@roypranesh

sushilkumar 的头像

sushilkumar4 天前

@roypranesh Is SCST ACT ne Swarn ,OBC ka jeena haraam kar diya hai 😅 Samvidhan aur SC ko taak per rakhke yeh jaatiwad kanoon bunaya hai,yeh koi saamajik nyay nahi hai aur wasooli mein sabh miley hue ji,dar k saaye mein ji rahe hai sabhi sirfh SC/ST walo ko chodkar,kiska no lagega patta nah

shankar tripathi 的头像

shankar tripathi4 天前

@roypranesh #ReservationReformआंदोलन #UGC_काला_कानून_वापस_लो

相关视频

Major Debate On SC/ST Act The SC/ST Act is being seriously misused. The compensation mechanism allows a substantial portion of the money to reach the complainant even before the case is proven in court: Dr. Neha Das The SC/ST Act is essential to protect vulnerable communities, but allegations of misuse must be examined through due process without undermining genuine cases: Rajkumar Rajan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

Major Debate On SC/ST Act The SC/ST Act is being seriously misused. The compensation mechanism allows a substantial portion of the money to reach the complainant even before the case is proven in court: Dr. Neha Das The SC/ST Act is essential to protect vulnerable communities, but allegations of misuse must be examined through due process without undermining genuine cases: Rajkumar Rajan tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

27,339 次观看 • 5 天前

'Talk To Pakistan' Debate The peace between India and Pakistan is hampered by warmongers in both countries: JohnDayal There should be talks, but not until Pakistan stops funding terrorism: हर्ष वर्धन त्रिपाठी 🇮🇳Harsh Vardhan Tripathi tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

'Talk To Pakistan' Debate The peace between India and Pakistan is hampered by warmongers in both countries: JohnDayal There should be talks, but not until Pakistan stops funding terrorism: हर्ष वर्धन त्रिपाठी 🇮🇳Harsh Vardhan Tripathi tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

16,412 次观看 • 2 个月前

"What Congress did with Shahbano case, exactly same thing BJP did with Subhash Kashinath Mahajan case in SC/ST act. Judiciary cannot prevent the misuse of a law if govt goes & passes amendments to overturn it's judgements." Debate on SC/ST act on Timesnow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

"What Congress did with Shahbano case, exactly same thing BJP did with Subhash Kashinath Mahajan case in SC/ST act. Judiciary cannot prevent the misuse of a law if govt goes & passes amendments to overturn it's judgements." Debate on SC/ST act on Timesnow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

Dr. Neha Das

19,226 次观看 • 5 天前

Storm Over CJP's Remark On SC If the Government of India has promised something, do you think it is not valid?: Vaishnavi Gaur, Spokesperson CJP, in conversation with Pranesh Kumar Roy The assurance was given by the government to the CJP protesters that action would not be taken against protesters...- Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate, SC

Storm Over CJP's Remark On SC If the Government of India has promised something, do you think it is not valid?: Vaishnavi Gaur, Spokesperson CJP, in conversation with Pranesh Kumar Roy The assurance was given by the government to the CJP protesters that action would not be taken against protesters...- Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate, SC

TIMES NOW

36,149 次观看 • 1 个月前

SC-ST Act Horror Continues! Now in Kasganj, UP, 37 Thakurs have been booked under the SC-ST Act. Per reports, rumours spread in the village that an Ambedkar statue had been vandalised. DM Pranay Singh and SP OP Singh reached with force, inspected the statue and confirmed it was intact. Thakurs say they were the ones misbehaved with first, and that the SC/ST case was slapped on 38 people without a proper preliminary inquiry. They are demanding a neutral probe.

SC-ST Act Horror Continues! Now in Kasganj, UP, 37 Thakurs have been booked under the SC-ST Act. Per reports, rumours spread in the village that an Ambedkar statue had been vandalised. DM Pranay Singh and SP OP Singh reached with force, inspected the statue and confirmed it was intact. Thakurs say they were the ones misbehaved with first, and that the SC/ST case was slapped on 38 people without a proper preliminary inquiry. They are demanding a neutral probe.

Treeni

47,399 次观看 • 13 天前

"Fake news against SC-ST Act." 🚨 "Why SC-ST Act imposed on Brahmins?"🚨 Manu media and caste Hindus are spewing hate against Dalits over Darbhanga case. DSP Prabhakar Tiwari, who is himself a Brahmin, explained the truth. This is not the Manu era. If you practice casteism against Dalits, you'll be arrested under SC-ST Act. Why do you think being a Brahmin makes you superior or gives you the freedom to commit crimes against Dalits? Casteism is a form of terrorism, and there should be zero tolerance for it. The govt also follow the same. Cope. The SC-ST community is witnessing the hatred and misinformation by caste Hindus and Manu Media being spread. Boycott any belief system or media channel that spreads false narratives or dehumanizes you.

"Fake news against SC-ST Act." 🚨 "Why SC-ST Act imposed on Brahmins?"🚨 Manu media and caste Hindus are spewing hate against Dalits over Darbhanga case. DSP Prabhakar Tiwari, who is himself a Brahmin, explained the truth. This is not the Manu era. If you practice casteism against Dalits, you'll be arrested under SC-ST Act. Why do you think being a Brahmin makes you superior or gives you the freedom to commit crimes against Dalits? Casteism is a form of terrorism, and there should be zero tolerance for it. The govt also follow the same. Cope. The SC-ST community is witnessing the hatred and misinformation by caste Hindus and Manu Media being spread. Boycott any belief system or media channel that spreads false narratives or dehumanizes you.

Suraj Kumar Bauddh

26,585 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 LANDMARK Supreme Court Ruling: “An incident inside a private house does not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act.” Court further held that the SC/ST Act alone cannot automatically DENY ANTICIPATORY BAIL. - Courts must first check prima facie if a real offence is made out before rejecting pre-arrest bail. A major check on misuse of the stringent law. Significant relief in many cases🎯

🚨 LANDMARK Supreme Court Ruling: “An incident inside a private house does not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act.” Court further held that the SC/ST Act alone cannot automatically DENY ANTICIPATORY BAIL. - Courts must first check prima facie if a real offence is made out before rejecting pre-arrest bail. A major check on misuse of the stringent law. Significant relief in many cases🎯

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

80,860 次观看 • 4 个月前

Live misuse of the SC-ST act caught on camera. See how a DaIit govt employee is asking an Advocate to frame his senior under a false case of the atrocity act. It happened while I was travelling with my advocate friend. Suddenly someone called and asked about filing a false case. He said his senior, from the OBC community, is not granting him more holidays and he wants to send him to jail in a false SC-ST act. He kept insisting that how a grievous case be framed against his senior. This is very alarming how people are using this act to take revenge on seniors in the workplace.

Live misuse of the SC-ST act caught on camera. See how a DaIit govt employee is asking an Advocate to frame his senior under a false case of the atrocity act. It happened while I was travelling with my advocate friend. Suddenly someone called and asked about filing a false case. He said his senior, from the OBC community, is not granting him more holidays and he wants to send him to jail in a false SC-ST act. He kept insisting that how a grievous case be framed against his senior. This is very alarming how people are using this act to take revenge on seniors in the workplace.

Shubham Sharma

137,561 次观看 • 1 年前

It’s Time to Unite Against False SC/ST Act Cases - General Janta party Everywhere I look, I’m seeing reports of people allegedly being falsely booked under the SC/ST Act. It genuinely concerns me. Some of these people may not share our ideology at all. We may disagree with them politically on almost everything. But when it comes to justice, that doesn’t matter. If we believe someone has been falsely implicated, we should still stand for their right to a fair investigation and a fair chance to defend themselves. And I keep thinking if people with money, influence and resources can struggle to get bail, what happens to an ordinary poor person caught in such a case? Real victims of caste atrocities absolutely deserve justice. But innocent people also deserve protection from false cases and misuse of the law. This is bigger than party politics. It’s time for people across the political divide to unite and speak for a fairer system and serious SC/ST Act reform. Justice should protect the victim without punishing the innocent.

It’s Time to Unite Against False SC/ST Act Cases - General Janta party Everywhere I look, I’m seeing reports of people allegedly being falsely booked under the SC/ST Act. It genuinely concerns me. Some of these people may not share our ideology at all. We may disagree with them politically on almost everything. But when it comes to justice, that doesn’t matter. If we believe someone has been falsely implicated, we should still stand for their right to a fair investigation and a fair chance to defend themselves. And I keep thinking if people with money, influence and resources can struggle to get bail, what happens to an ordinary poor person caught in such a case? Real victims of caste atrocities absolutely deserve justice. But innocent people also deserve protection from false cases and misuse of the law. This is bigger than party politics. It’s time for people across the political divide to unite and speak for a fairer system and serious SC/ST Act reform. Justice should protect the victim without punishing the innocent.

General Janta Party

13,373 次观看 • 7 天前

Sanitation inspector Lucky Sharma of Agra Nagar Nigam was beaten with shoes by sanitation worker Bobby Valmiki after Sharma attached him for negligence in performing his duty. Now, Bobby Valmiki and his friends are demanding to lodge an FIR against Sharma under SC/ST Act. If you will beat or abuse some SC-ST person then there will be an FIR against you and if an SC-ST person will beat or abuse you even then there will be an FIR against you. This is exactly how it works.

Sanitation inspector Lucky Sharma of Agra Nagar Nigam was beaten with shoes by sanitation worker Bobby Valmiki after Sharma attached him for negligence in performing his duty. Now, Bobby Valmiki and his friends are demanding to lodge an FIR against Sharma under SC/ST Act. If you will beat or abuse some SC-ST person then there will be an FIR against you and if an SC-ST person will beat or abuse you even then there will be an FIR against you. This is exactly how it works.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

17,873 次观看 • 6 个月前

Domestic Violence V's SC-ST Case — Shocking Misuse of the SC-ST Act! Ghaziabad, UP: A Rajput woman married Dalit policeman Sagar Kumar. Within months, she says he abandoned her and is now threatening to file an SC/ST case against her and her family if she does not leave him. She also alleges he is involved with multiple women and that his father has been in jail for 20 years in a rape case.

Domestic Violence V's SC-ST Case — Shocking Misuse of the SC-ST Act! Ghaziabad, UP: A Rajput woman married Dalit policeman Sagar Kumar. Within months, she says he abandoned her and is now threatening to file an SC/ST case against her and her family if she does not leave him. She also alleges he is involved with multiple women and that his father has been in jail for 20 years in a rape case.

Treeni

17,230 次观看 • 7 个月前

Twenty SC/ST MPs are at Parliament Street Police Station to file a Zero FIR for an act of untouchability, punishable under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, committed against Congress President Shri Mallikarjun Kharge at Haldwani on 10th Aug 2026. Even after two hours of persuasion, the SHO refuses to register the Zero FIR and refuses to give reasons in writing. If this is how SC/ST MPs are treated, imagine the plight of an ordinary SC/ST citizen trying to register an FIR for an atrocity. 📍 New Delhi

Twenty SC/ST MPs are at Parliament Street Police Station to file a Zero FIR for an act of untouchability, punishable under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, committed against Congress President Shri Mallikarjun Kharge at Haldwani on 10th Aug 2026. Even after two hours of persuasion, the SHO refuses to register the Zero FIR and refuses to give reasons in writing. If this is how SC/ST MPs are treated, imagine the plight of an ordinary SC/ST citizen trying to register an FIR for an atrocity. 📍 New Delhi

Congress

99,322 次观看 • 7 天前

I Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🐯🔥 As an advocate, I have a genuine legal question regarding the Swatantra Bhardwaj case. Under Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), an act done in exercise of the right of private defence is not an offence. Sections 35–40 further define when and to what extent this right can be exercised. So, if the factual defence is that the accused acted in lawful private defence, that defence necessarily requires examination before concluding criminal liability. But here is the important legal question: If the underlying act is ultimately found to be protected by lawful private defence, what is the legal basis for sustaining an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? The SC/ST Act does not make every dispute or assault involving an SC/ST person automatically an offence under the Act. The specific ingredients of the relevant provision must be satisfied. Therefore, the questions for investigation and ultimately the Court are: What specific offence under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act is alleged? What are the factual ingredients supporting that particular provision? Was the alleged act committed with the requisite caste-related intent/knowledge, where required? Was there an immediate threat giving rise to a lawful right of private defence? Was the force used proportionate to the threat, or did it exceed the limits prescribed by law? A claim of self-defence is not an automatic acquittal, but equally, registration/invocation of the SC/ST Act cannot substitute for proving the statutory ingredients of the offence. And most importantly, for every citizen: If you get into a physical dispute with anyone, including a person belonging to SC/ST, do not assume that you have no right to defend yourself. But do not use excessive force either. Preserve CCTV/video evidence, identify independent witnesses, seek medical examination immediately if injured, make your own complaint/counter-complaint where legally warranted, and consult a criminal lawyer before making statements on social media. The law protects the right of private defence, but only within its statutory limits. Delhi Police Rekha Gupta

I Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🐯🔥 As an advocate, I have a genuine legal question regarding the Swatantra Bhardwaj case. Under Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), an act done in exercise of the right of private defence is not an offence. Sections 35–40 further define when and to what extent this right can be exercised. So, if the factual defence is that the accused acted in lawful private defence, that defence necessarily requires examination before concluding criminal liability. But here is the important legal question: If the underlying act is ultimately found to be protected by lawful private defence, what is the legal basis for sustaining an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? The SC/ST Act does not make every dispute or assault involving an SC/ST person automatically an offence under the Act. The specific ingredients of the relevant provision must be satisfied. Therefore, the questions for investigation and ultimately the Court are: What specific offence under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act is alleged? What are the factual ingredients supporting that particular provision? Was the alleged act committed with the requisite caste-related intent/knowledge, where required? Was there an immediate threat giving rise to a lawful right of private defence? Was the force used proportionate to the threat, or did it exceed the limits prescribed by law? A claim of self-defence is not an automatic acquittal, but equally, registration/invocation of the SC/ST Act cannot substitute for proving the statutory ingredients of the offence. And most importantly, for every citizen: If you get into a physical dispute with anyone, including a person belonging to SC/ST, do not assume that you have no right to defend yourself. But do not use excessive force either. Preserve CCTV/video evidence, identify independent witnesses, seek medical examination immediately if injured, make your own complaint/counter-complaint where legally warranted, and consult a criminal lawyer before making statements on social media. The law protects the right of private defence, but only within its statutory limits. Delhi Police Rekha Gupta

ADV. ASHUTOSH J. DUBEY 🇮🇳

24,923 次观看 • 11 天前

David Jatav from Aligarh posts abusive videos full of casteist slurs on Facebook and Instagram. Law student Mayur Garg gave a complaint against him in the local police station and in return David attacked him with his goons. And now David managed to lodge one more FIR against Mayur through his wife under SC-ST Act claiming that Mayur commented on the post of his wife on Instagram. Can there be a better reason to lodge an FIR under SC/ST Act against someone? Mayur Garg alleged that David Jatav was threatening him since long to withdraw his complaint or face a case of SC/ST Act. Kind attn DGP UP CM Office, GoUP

David Jatav from Aligarh posts abusive videos full of casteist slurs on Facebook and Instagram. Law student Mayur Garg gave a complaint against him in the local police station and in return David attacked him with his goons. And now David managed to lodge one more FIR against Mayur through his wife under SC-ST Act claiming that Mayur commented on the post of his wife on Instagram. Can there be a better reason to lodge an FIR under SC/ST Act against someone? Mayur Garg alleged that David Jatav was threatening him since long to withdraw his complaint or face a case of SC/ST Act. Kind attn DGP UP CM Office, GoUP

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

29,695 次观看 • 6 个月前

Delhi: Supporter of Swatantra Bharadwaj, Daksh Choudhary says, "There are charges under Section 307 and the SC/ST Act...Today, we have also come to submit a complaint and memorandum from our side, and to give a warning that if justice is not done in an impartial manner..."

Delhi: Supporter of Swatantra Bharadwaj, Daksh Choudhary says, "There are charges under Section 307 and the SC/ST Act...Today, we have also come to submit a complaint and memorandum from our side, and to give a warning that if justice is not done in an impartial manner..."

IANS

1,595,709 次观看 • 10 天前

VIDEO | Here's activist Yogendra Yadav (Yogendra Yadav) said on Union Cabinet approving caste census. "Every 10 years, we have a census in our country, in which every single person living in India is recorded and their details are taken down. In that, for the last 70 years, we have always asked the religion of the head of the household. We have always asked language. We have always asked caste category, SC, ST or others. The only and in the case of SC and ST, we also in the census record the exact caste that they belong to. The only thing we do not do so far is to record the caste for those who are not SC or ST. So, when we say caste census is going to take place, it means that what has always been done in the case of SC or ST will now also be done in the case of OBC and in the case of those who are neither SC, ST or OBC. So for every single household, someone would come and say, what is your language? What is your religion? What is your caste? That is what caste census means. Why is it needed? It is needed because in our country, several policies have been framed based on caste disadvantage. There are policies based on gender. There are policy based on income. But there are also policies based on caste, caste grouping." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Here's activist Yogendra Yadav (Yogendra Yadav) said on Union Cabinet approving caste census. "Every 10 years, we have a census in our country, in which every single person living in India is recorded and their details are taken down. In that, for the last 70 years, we have always asked the religion of the head of the household. We have always asked language. We have always asked caste category, SC, ST or others. The only and in the case of SC and ST, we also in the census record the exact caste that they belong to. The only thing we do not do so far is to record the caste for those who are not SC or ST. So, when we say caste census is going to take place, it means that what has always been done in the case of SC or ST will now also be done in the case of OBC and in the case of those who are neither SC, ST or OBC. So for every single household, someone would come and say, what is your language? What is your religion? What is your caste? That is what caste census means. Why is it needed? It is needed because in our country, several policies have been framed based on caste disadvantage. There are policies based on gender. There are policy based on income. But there are also policies based on caste, caste grouping." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

10,488 次观看 • 1 年前

VIDEO | "The SC in a historical judgement has sought to stop the illegal demolitions that have been taking place in the country in the last 2-3 years. The SC has said that if there is an illegal demolition, there will be personal liability of the official, and they will restitute that property from their own money. The court has made sure there will be a 15 days notice that will be given, the notice will also be pasted on the wall of the property that has to be demolished, that notice is to be sent to the DM on the same date, with recorded through e-mail and otherwise, and that cannot be backdating of any notice, which was one of the agreements, and by doing this the SC has sought to stop the juggernaut of the bulldozer action and we are sure the state will be bound to follow," says advocate Anas Tanweer on SC judgement on bulldozer action. #Bulldozeraction #SC

VIDEO | "The SC in a historical judgement has sought to stop the illegal demolitions that have been taking place in the country in the last 2-3 years. The SC has said that if there is an illegal demolition, there will be personal liability of the official, and they will restitute that property from their own money. The court has made sure there will be a 15 days notice that will be given, the notice will also be pasted on the wall of the property that has to be demolished, that notice is to be sent to the DM on the same date, with recorded through e-mail and otherwise, and that cannot be backdating of any notice, which was one of the agreements, and by doing this the SC has sought to stop the juggernaut of the bulldozer action and we are sure the state will be bound to follow," says advocate Anas Tanweer on SC judgement on bulldozer action. #Bulldozeraction #SC

Press Trust of India

157,814 次观看 • 1 年前

I asked a question on India TV And i want each one of you to respond if you agree with me : There is no doubt in my mind that if someone makes hate speeches against our SC/ST fellow citizens, they must face the law. Now do you agree similarly: if anyone says that Brahmin & Baniyas must be killed, slaughtered or hate speeches are made against the GC calling for violence they too must face the law!

I asked a question on India TV And i want each one of you to respond if you agree with me : There is no doubt in my mind that if someone makes hate speeches against our SC/ST fellow citizens, they must face the law. Now do you agree similarly: if anyone says that Brahmin & Baniyas must be killed, slaughtered or hate speeches are made against the GC calling for violence they too must face the law!

Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳

102,322 次观看 • 11 天前

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court stays UGC Equity Regulations 2026, Congress Leader T S Singh Deo says, "... A section of society has been exploited the most for decades, and to protect them, laws have been enacted, such as the SC/ST Protection Act and the Women’s Safety Act, along with UGC guidelines which later underwent many changes and reforms from time to time. The UGC has introduced regulations to safeguard the rights of SC, ST, and OBC communities. A major flaw that I see is that in the 2012 rules there was a clause for action against false complainants, which has been removed in the new regulations..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court stays UGC Equity Regulations 2026, Congress Leader T S Singh Deo says, "... A section of society has been exploited the most for decades, and to protect them, laws have been enacted, such as the SC/ST Protection Act and the Women’s Safety Act, along with UGC guidelines which later underwent many changes and reforms from time to time. The UGC has introduced regulations to safeguard the rights of SC, ST, and OBC communities. A major flaw that I see is that in the 2012 rules there was a clause for action against false complainants, which has been removed in the new regulations..."

ANI

17,725 次观看 • 7 个月前