Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"What Congress did with Shahbano case, exactly same thing BJP did with Subhash Kashinath Mahajan case in SC/ST act. Judiciary cannot prevent the misuse of a law if govt goes & passes amendments to overturn it's judgements." Debate on SC/ST act on Timesnow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

19,226 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

18 Comments

Enlightened Jīva's profile picture
Enlightened Jīva5 days ago

@roypranesh Why can't the courts simply strike down the entire law as unconstitutional since there are already laws against discrimination, and the Scst act is too punitive and liable for and in fact, encouraging of misuse targeting people based on their caste? 1/2

🇮🇳 Mr. Jha 🕉️'s profile picture
🇮🇳 Mr. Jha 🕉️5 days ago

@roypranesh Mam ,we are concerned about you after seeing the Neel manav post about dragging you in a fake scst case . More power to you 🙏

Amit Vyas ❖'s profile picture
Amit Vyas ❖5 days ago

@roypranesh The comparison is spot on. In both cases, electoral expediency was prioritized over the constitutional principle of equality. Diluting due process and removing preliminary inquiries turns a protective law into an instrument of...

Ram's profile picture
Ram4 days ago

@roypranesh Just to protect one section added an Act that is used to punish innocents outside of that act. WTH is Equality - everyone from politicians to judiciary, activists and media only talks. Primary rights denied for a section. Only for those with street & vote power system works

Sanatani Bhartiya's profile picture
Sanatani Bhartiya5 days ago

@roypranesh I am surprised ,why haven't these blue pigeons not blamed the GCs for covid outbreak? It was definitely an atrocity by the GCs,so as to make sure that all the oxygen in this universe is for GCs only.

Tulika's profile picture
Tulika4 days ago

No person in their right mind and even a minimum common sense can support the SCST Act in the current form, and I am sure @BJP4India knows this as well but the hunger for power is so much that it overides all sense of justice and human rights. This is despicable and against humanity which the politicians are shamelessly using their power to impose on the country.

GSC's profile picture
GSC4 days ago

@roypranesh When Judiciary wants to protect itself it will do everything and more . Supreme Court struck down National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act and the 99th Constitutional Amendment in October 2015 by ruling that it violated the "basic structure" of the Constitution.

alex warikoo's profile picture
alex warikoo5 days ago

@roypranesh

वनगमन बंदोपाध्याय भारतेंदु's profile picture
वनगमन बंदोपाध्याय भारतेंदु5 days ago

@roypranesh Nothing will happen, Modi is planning a Backward Class Atrocities Act to let Backwards have the same power over GCs as Ambedkarite have! The end goal is to witch hunt the general castes in India. The republic has failed us!

Priti's profile picture
Priti4 days ago

@roypranesh @HMOIndia why Raul Vinci is not in jail. Is this act is applicable for us only? @narendramodi

Dalian's profile picture
Dalian4 days ago

@roypranesh Legislature* overturns.

lalit शाण्डिल्य मिश्र's profile picture
lalit शाण्डिल्य मिश्र4 days ago

@roypranesh That is why the draconic SC ST act would be written in history books as #ModiAct

CHUMMY 🇮🇳's profile picture
CHUMMY 🇮🇳5 days ago

@roypranesh More power to you.. JAI BHIMASHANKAR

Black Cat's profile picture
Black Cat4 days ago

@roypranesh It proves Congress was Islamic party and BJP is Bahujan party. Hindu kiske saath hai? Koi hai?

Col Rajendra Shukla's profile picture
Col Rajendra Shukla4 days ago

@roypranesh what stops CJI to trash Modi's Act relating to SC ST Start Up to Earn Crores of Tax Payers money by filing fake case sharing money earned with lawyers. @barandbench

राज-UR's profile picture
राज-UR4 days ago

@roypranesh And amendments were made by BJP under Modi

अजातमित्र's profile picture
अजातमित्र4 days ago

@roypranesh Sorry but what modi did with SC/ST act is no where comparable to Shah bano case. Rajeev Gandhi was clever enough to leave the loophole, that was used by judiciary in Daniel Latif case. Muslim women are eligible for maintenance but that should be paid single time for life

Pratik Paul Basumatary's profile picture
Pratik Paul Basumatary5 days ago

@roypranesh Did you verify your facts

Related Videos