Malcolm Roberts cslls out Professor Brian Cox about his climate change graphs and statistics. The audience and panel all laugh. But who do you believe here?

Audience full of sheep.

@JoolsEck17 Malcolm Roberts spells out the common sense approach to dismantling the Climate Scam while Brian Cox, the Host, and Climate Scam supporters in the audience sneer and try to evade the obvious.

Recent data shows Roberts is correct. Long term data also shows 'climate ' is not caused by modern man . We are currently coming out of a mini ice age and so should expect some warming - and could do with a lot more to be honest . Cox is either not very bright or spreading disinformation.

Man made climate change is the biggest hoax perpetrated on humanity in documented history. Current “science” figures. CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere of which humans produces 3%. That means we add 0.0012% of CO2. Statistically irrelevant. The optimum CO2 levels for plant life is double the current CO2 levels at the low end and 3 x at the hight end. The average CO2 for Earth is equal to 0.09-0.1%. We are literally replacing the CO2 lost from the atmosphere via dying carbon based life being absorbed into the soil. CO2 levels under 0.03% put all life on Earth is danger as it stops sustaining plan life. The biggest extinction event on earth was caused by a sudden drop in CO2 - Ordovician. 85% of all life on Earth was erased.

🤷🏻‍♂️

Brian Cox IS NOT a scientist, he is a parrot for science, like the rest and to suit his narrative he will only show a graph that goes back only a few years Lets look at it all..

I think Brian Cox makes a fool of himself here. He can't handle a challenge and immediately starts down the - do you believe we landed on the moon etc. This is why many of us question the science - its because ridicule and name calling makes us suspicious.

Brian Cox is an insufferable cunt

the cult of personality ... the clapping seals loved cox but he was losing it because he got angry because someone rationally challenged the orthodoxy like galileo cox is the inquisition and #netzero is the scam

@ProfBrianCox, the guy who loves to talk about correlation and causation, had a brain freeze when the excess deaths in 2021 shot up directly after the rollout of the jabs. In that case, correlation didn't = causation because it was the wrong type of correlation and causation.

Brian Cox sold himself a long time ago. I actually pity him now as he babbles desperate bollocks for the puppet masters to try and prove his worth to them

Cox is an idiot. Wheeled out grinning but not considering cause and effect.

The Met office was found to be inventing long-term temp data at 103 non-existent weather stations.

I’ve been keeping tabs on Roberts since Covid…. He is wide awake!

Cox is the English version of NdG Tyson to dumb down the people. The guy’s a fraud and a well paid one.

If all the agencies are collaborating Brian, then they wouldn't 'accidentally' arrive at the same conclusion, collaboration 'ensures' they come up with the same conclusion...very convenient. That's what collaboration means you fucking permagrin spastic.

Listen to that audience of hysterical clapping shrieking sea lion sheeple, turns the stomach.

Cox is a brainwashed establishment clown, and I don't care how many letters he has after his name, the man is an ignorant fool.

How stupid should Brian Cox feel now 🤡

"I brought the graph" - pulls out the hockey stick graph 🤡

Brian Cox is a fraud! He’s not even a proper scientist! He’s been placed into his position specifically to promote the scam that is climate change crisis.

Senator Malcome Roberts bruv. @MRobertsQLD

Both NASA and NOAA have been caught many times fudging the data on global temperatures. Canada was caught destroying old temperature records while digitizing. I remember another little graph, the hockey stick they called it. It to was presented as fact by 3rd rate scientists.

For a professor - Brian Cox is pretty dense. Then you realize his whole monetary career is relying on him perpetuating this climate change myth. He should know better, but his bank account won’t let him.

Let just one scientist provide solid evidence that carbon creates climate change That’s where we must start

Imagine trying to reduce a gas that plants use to live and create oxygen that we use to live thats at 0.04% and saying said gas is warming the planet... perhaps look into things like solar maximum and minimum sun flares our distance from the sun.. look at the cambrian period!

I don’t mind Brian Cox but his appeal to authority is pretty telling. As if we’re supposed to just believe anything we’re told by NASA. The first graph he pulls out is also very limited in how far back it goes. What if the previous hundred or so years are higher?

Professor bwian cockwomble .. completely triggered along with the hand picked sheep 🐑 audience!!

Cox is very patronising here. He should stick to being the keyboard player in a pop band. Most scientists (credible ones) encourage their hypothesis or beliefs to be continually challenged

The fact that you all are so shocked that a scientist could manipulate data means that you are truly sheep. Don’t trust those idiots. All they want is more money. If they skew the data and make it look inconclusive, then they can get more Grant money it’s not that difficult to follow.

All the data sets have been manipulated. “Climategate” proved how they were doing it. A third of “measuring stations” the Met Office publish data from don’t even exist. They just invent “readings” for them using computer models. Older data sets are “interpretations” from proxies.

I'm with Malcolm Roberts on this. The data has been corrupted.