Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Marco Rubio: “No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional,” adding, “we've complied with the law 100%” and will “continue to comply.”

Mario Nawfal

3,138,751 subscribers

96,999 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Rubio: No presidential administration has ever excepted the war powers act as constitutional

Rubio: No presidential administration has ever excepted the war powers act as constitutional

Acyn

26,704 views • 5 months ago

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Sec. Rubio on war powers vote re: Iran: "Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there's no law that requires us to do that…No presidential administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as constitutional."

Breaking911

40,058 views • 5 months ago

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

SECRETARY RUBIO: The War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional. This has been the position of every single presidential administration since this law passed. It’s an infringement on the president’s constitutional powers.

Department of State

72,872 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

BREAKING: Marco Rubio is NOT BACKING DOWN to the threats of a democratic lead War Powers resolution over their actions in Iran: "We've OVER COMPLIED with the law and what it requires." "Congress votes on those. They can if they want. There are mechanisms for it and we've complied with the war powers act even though we believe it's unconstitutional as has every other administration. Every other president has found the war powers act to be unconstitutional and nonetheless we notified the gang of eight which was an appropriate mechanism by which to notify congress. We sent a notification within 48 hours the way the law requires." Rubio is NUKING them from orbit!

Gunther Eagleman™

19,107 views • 5 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio deems the War Powers Act UNCONSTITUTIONAL Democrats have failed again. "I want to be clear on the War Powers Act: it's unconstitutional, and EVERY presidential administration has taken that position." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

24,061 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio says Congress can try WHATEVER THEY WANT, strikes on Iran will CONTINUE unabated Marco is unleashing right now 🔥 "Congress can if they want! We complied with War Powers even though we believe it's unconstitutional, as has EVERY other administration and president." "We notified the Gang of 8...we sent the notification within 48 hours." "I'm here to have my 6th or 7th BRIEFING!" "We've OVER-complied with the law and what it requires."

🚨 JUST IN: Sec. Marco Rubio says Congress can try WHATEVER THEY WANT, strikes on Iran will CONTINUE unabated Marco is unleashing right now 🔥 "Congress can if they want! We complied with War Powers even though we believe it's unconstitutional, as has EVERY other administration and president." "We notified the Gang of 8...we sent the notification within 48 hours." "I'm here to have my 6th or 7th BRIEFING!" "We've OVER-complied with the law and what it requires."

Eric Daugherty

21,360 views • 5 months ago

Q: Do you think that the United States does need to go to Congress in order to conduct land strikes in Venezuela? Rubio: I'm not going to speculate on that. All I'm going to tell you is that no administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as being constitutional.

Q: Do you think that the United States does need to go to Congress in order to conduct land strikes in Venezuela? Rubio: I'm not going to speculate on that. All I'm going to tell you is that no administration has ever accepted the War Powers Act as being constitutional.

FactPost

266,858 views • 8 months ago

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

"We've complied with the War Powers Act even though we believe its unconstitutional." Sec'y Rubio refutes claims from members of Congress that the Trump administration required their authorization before launching Iran strikes.

MS NOW

45,079 views • 5 months ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio said he would “love” to comment on the War Powers Act before declaring it unconstitutional: “The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%.” It’s worth noting that Thomas Massie Thomas Massie recently co-sponsored the War Powers Act with Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar. Massie, Omar, and the elected Dems are completely lawless.

Loomer Unleashed

69,791 views • 3 months ago

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

.Secretary Marco Rubio: "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional—100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of President Donald J. Trump now, this is the position of every single president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed... We comply with it in terms of like notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress... but even as a senator, I would say that the war powers act is 100% unconstitutional."

Rapid Response 47

204,875 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Rubio warned the G7 that the Iran war will continue for another 2-4 weeks

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Rubio warned the G7 that the Iran war will continue for another 2-4 weeks

Mario Nawfal

187,181 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of the United States now. This is the position of EVERY SINGLE president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed. It's completely unconstitutional. Now, we comply with it in terms of notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress, right? And we do that, but even as a Senator, I would say that the War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional."

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Secretary Rubio just stated that he believes the War Powers Act, which Democrats keep trying to invoke to stop President Trump's Iran operations, is UNCONSTITUTIONAL "The War Powers Act is unconstitutional, 100%. Now, this is not the position of me, not the position of the President of the United States now. This is the position of EVERY SINGLE president that has occupied this position since the day that law passed. It's completely unconstitutional. Now, we comply with it in terms of notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress, right? And we do that, but even as a Senator, I would say that the War Powers Act is 100% unconstitutional."

Nick Sortor

111,283 views • 3 months ago

He’s manhandling the media. Secretary Rubio makes a reporter look foolish after being asked why the administration didn’t notify Congress prior to the strikes on Iran. REPORTER: “Why not notify Congress ahead of this?” RUBIO: “We did.” “We notified Congress. We notified the gang of eight, we notified Congressional leadership.” “There’s no law that requires us to do that. The law says we have to notify them 48 hours after beginning hostilities, we’ve done that. I think the notification went today.” “But we did notify members of Congress in advance, but we can’t notify 535 members of Congress.” “Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there’s no law that requires us to do that.” “And I want to say something, because I see people on TV — looks like that’s fine if they want to take the War Powers vote, they can do that. They’ve done that a bunch of times.” “But people keep saying that we have some law — there is NO law that requires the president to have done anything with regards to this.” “To begin with, no president, presidential administration has ever accepted that the War Powers Act is constitutional, not Republican presidents or Democratic presidents.” Then Rubio landed the haymaker: “That said, we have followed the notification of 48 hours, we are here today — I have done more gang of eight briefings than I got in the four years that Biden and I were members of the gang of eight.” “All of that said, we have complied with the law 100% and we’re going to continue to comply with it.”

He’s manhandling the media. Secretary Rubio makes a reporter look foolish after being asked why the administration didn’t notify Congress prior to the strikes on Iran. REPORTER: “Why not notify Congress ahead of this?” RUBIO: “We did.” “We notified Congress. We notified the gang of eight, we notified Congressional leadership.” “There’s no law that requires us to do that. The law says we have to notify them 48 hours after beginning hostilities, we’ve done that. I think the notification went today.” “But we did notify members of Congress in advance, but we can’t notify 535 members of Congress.” “Congress can vote on whatever they want, but there’s no law that requires us to do that.” “And I want to say something, because I see people on TV — looks like that’s fine if they want to take the War Powers vote, they can do that. They’ve done that a bunch of times.” “But people keep saying that we have some law — there is NO law that requires the president to have done anything with regards to this.” “To begin with, no president, presidential administration has ever accepted that the War Powers Act is constitutional, not Republican presidents or Democratic presidents.” Then Rubio landed the haymaker: “That said, we have followed the notification of 48 hours, we are here today — I have done more gang of eight briefings than I got in the four years that Biden and I were members of the gang of eight.” “All of that said, we have complied with the law 100% and we’re going to continue to comply with it.”

Overton

250,119 views • 5 months ago

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

"Under the War Powers Act of 1973, the administration must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing troops into a conflict. Secretary of State Rubio did that," Congressional correspondent Lisa Desjardins said. "Now, the War Powers Act also says that presidents can only continue that conflict for 60 to 90 days. However, most presidents have ignored the War Powers Act," Desjardins added.

PBS News

33,144 views • 5 months ago

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

You keep hearing that the president’s military actions are “unconstitutional” because of the War Powers Act of 1973. I break down the facts. No president — Democrat or Republican — has ever accepted the constitutionality of the War Powers Act. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it, and the Constitution clearly divides authority: Congress can declare war, but the President is the Commander-in-Chief. The framers intentionally rejected giving Congress the power to “make war,” limiting it instead to declaring war, while the president executes military operations and foreign policy. In this clip, I explain the real constitutional structure behind war powers and why the political debate you’re hearing is often more about politics than law. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

44,094 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸Marco Rubio: If diplomacy fails, it 'will not be the fault of the US or our allies in the Gulf, it will be 100% Iran's fault' 🇮🇷Iran: You started this war, not us.

🇺🇸Marco Rubio: If diplomacy fails, it 'will not be the fault of the US or our allies in the Gulf, it will be 100% Iran's fault' 🇮🇷Iran: You started this war, not us.

The Iran Spectator

37,010 views • 2 months ago

Tomorrow the Iran war becomes illegal under US law unless Congress votes to authorize it. 🚨 The 60 day War Powers Act deadline hits April 29. Under the 1973 law, the president must get congressional authorization to continue military operations or begin withdrawing troops. Congress has not authorized this war. The House failed to end it by a single vote. But Trump has not requested authorization yet. VP Vance has called the War Powers Act "a fake and unconstitutional law." Tomorrow could be big.

Tomorrow the Iran war becomes illegal under US law unless Congress votes to authorize it. 🚨 The 60 day War Powers Act deadline hits April 29. Under the 1973 law, the president must get congressional authorization to continue military operations or begin withdrawing troops. Congress has not authorized this war. The House failed to end it by a single vote. But Trump has not requested authorization yet. VP Vance has called the War Powers Act "a fake and unconstitutional law." Tomorrow could be big.

Crypto Rover

391,379 views • 3 months ago

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Trump’s strike on Iran was a fundamental undermining of Congress’s Constitutional Article I powers. We must reclaim that authority, hold this administration accountable, and pass the War Powers Act immediately.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal

11,853 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 “The president will start a war with Iran, because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate.” — Trump

🇺🇸🇮🇷 “The president will start a war with Iran, because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate.” — Trump

Lord Bebo

47,718 views • 1 year ago